12
© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010 HPRCT 2010 SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA Tom Kriesel INPO

Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA

Tom Kriesel

INPO

Page 2: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Historical Review

Page 3: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Historical Review• First Quarter 2009, plants started

reporting data in Consolidated Data Entry (CDE) system• Monthly number of “Human Performance

Errors”• Quartile ratings calculated by INPO based on

monthly and quarterly data• Industry data found under “Additional INPO

Indicator Results” on Plant Information Center homepage

Page 4: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Human Performance Event Performance Indicators

Page 5: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Human Performance Event Performance Indicators

Page 6: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Human Performance Event Performance Indicators

Page 7: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Challenges with reported data in 2009

• Some stations reporting “errors” not meeting significance criteria in INPO 08-004 and CDE Data Element Manual, INPO 04-004• Not being detected and corrected by HU leads

• Action needed by HU leads• Know who is updating CDE for your site• Ensure they are using correct site indicator for

input data• Validate correct data entered

Page 8: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Challenges with reported data in 2009

• Again – only report data meeting the significance criteria for a station event (site clock reset) as defined in 08-004

• Why not change indicator title to “event” instead of “error”• “Event” term already used by INPO for analysis of

industry submitted operation experience reports• Still being evaluated by analysis group at INPO

Page 9: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

Human Performance Event Performance Indicators

• There is other “Human Performance Events” data in the Plant Information Center (PIC) • Not the same as the new 08-004 indicator

• Stations report number quarterly

• Determined by INPO Analysis Group review of submitted Operation Experience reports

• INPO Analysis Group tags Human Performance as applicable during analysis of submitted Operation Experience reports

Page 10: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

What’s next?• 18 months of industry data will be available

end of second quarter 2010; then• Calculation will start using rolling 18 months

(aligned with 08-004)• Indicator will move into Plant Information Center

(PIC)• Targeted for implementation after 2010 second quarter

• Quartile values calculated using 18 month rolling data

Page 11: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

What’s next?• Industry team worked hard to establish

station event criteria in 08-004, but based on roll-out experience it is time to revisit the criteria.

Page 12: Fleitz and Kriesel - Site Reset Criteria.ppt

© 2010 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations HPRCT 2010HPRCT 2010

SITE HUMAN PERFORMANCE EVENT-FREE DAY RESET CRITERIA

Definition of a Site Human Performance Event-Free Day (EFD) Reset – When an event, as described in the table below, occurs as a result of either of the following:

• an initiating action (error) by an individual or group of individuals (Re) (event resulting from an active error)

• an initiating action (not an error) by an individual or group of

individuals during an activity conducted as planned (Md) (event resulting from a flawed defense or latent organizational weakness created within the last 18 months)