Flattening the Network

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    1/16

    Flattening the Network

    Intro to BoF Session in Denver, June

    Neil Farquharson

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    2/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.2 | Taming | January 2011

    Birds of a Feather in Denver

    Please sign up for our

    BoF SessionAt NewNOG52, June

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    3/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.3 | Taming | January 2011

    Data traffic predictions

    MINTS Minnesota Internet Traffic Study, http://www.dtc.umn.edu/mints/home.php

    Swanson-Gilder Estimating the Exaflood, 2008.

    Cisco Forecast Global IP Forecast and Methodology, 2007.

    2 dB/yr

    10E+0110E+0210E+0310E+0410E+0510E+0610E+0710E+0810E+09

    1980 1990 2000 2010 2020

    Dat

    aTraffic(Tb/month)

    MINTS low

    MINTS high

    Swanson-GilderCisco forecast

    Extrapolation from2007 MINTS measuredgrowth rate

    All content copyright ownerships acknowledged

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    4/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.4 | Taming | January 2011

    All content copyright ownerships acknowledged

    Traffic Predictions

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    5/16

    Star Trek copyright of Paramount

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    6/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.6 | Taming | January 2011

    Drivers for change

    Traffic growth leads to more core routers being deployed, as all traffic passes througha meshed router core

    Traditional delineation of Transport and IP networks results in limited operationalvisibility across domains, thus the cost of delivering services is not optimized

    Core architectures are increasingly expensive and power hungry Carriers looking for higher speeds (40G, 100G) and dramatic cost efficiencies

    From

    High volumes of video & internettraffic negatively impacting

    profitability

    Growing meshes of core routers tohandle ever-increasing traffic

    Separate IP & Transport domainswith minimal cross-domainoperational visibility

    To

    A new architecture that canaccommodate profitable growth forinternet and content distribution

    Leveraging the efficiencies ofintegrating flexible OTN and of

    powerful IP services

    Integration of the Optical domaininto the IP domain with cross-Layervisibility and automation

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    7/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.7 | Taming | January 2011

    HO-ODU HO-ODU HO-ODU

    HO-ODU

    HO-ODU

    level networking

    HO-ODU HO-ODU

    Sub- level networking

    LO-ODU LO-ODU

    Switching at Lambda or Sub-lambda (Port, Sub-port) Level

    LO-ODU

    Clear Channel

    Clients

    IP/MPLS

    Clients

    LO-ODU

    HO-ODU networking used whenclient throughput does not needfurther aggregation within a

    LO-ODU networking used whensub- multiplexing is needed (nostranded BW)

    ODU Termination (G.709 OAM)guarantees a clear demarcation Intermediate Monitoring can

    be electronic and/or photonic

    Switching can be electronicand/or photonic

    NE Bsub-switch

    NE A switch

    ODU(flex) switch

    ROADM

    OTN is the key convergence technology uniting current technologies with robust

    OAM and FEC for reliable transport that is very high bandwidth at low cost/bit

    Complete transparency forclients in flexible containers

    ODU container sizes well-suited for Ethernet transport

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    8/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.8 | Taming | January 2011

    ODUflex maps any bit-rate client to a single, right-sized transport container

    More flexibility for OTN

    ODUflex The Flexible Data Unit

    Provides for connection-orientedtransport of any variable bit-rate,leveraging its flexible-sizedcontainer (1.25 Gbps increments)

    Decouples client physical interfacefrom the network transport entity

    Maintains a 1:1 relation betweenclient interfaces and transportentities, reducing the # of transportentities and simplifying operations

    Supports transport of variable ratepacket streams (for instance VLANswithin a 100GE port)

    Similar to VCAT, but avoidsdifferential delay problem of VCAT

    Enables full utilization of networkresources, avoiding capacity waste

    Wavelength

    HO ODU/OCh

    Client

    interface

    Transport

    entity

    Physical

    interface

    HO ODU/OCh

    HO ODU/OCh

    ODUflexFlow (VLAN)

    ODUflexFlow (VLAN)

    HO ODU/OCh

    ODUflex

    ODU

    Phy

    Phy

    Phy

    ODUPhy

    ODUFlow (VLAN)Phy

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    9/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.9 | Taming | January 2011

    HO ODU

    VLAN #4

    VLAN #3

    VLAN Shapers

    VLAN #2

    Queue 2

    Queue 1

    Queue 3

    Queue 4

    Queue 6

    Queue 5

    Queue 7

    Queue 8

    Buffer Pool

    WFQ

    SP

    VLAN #1

    ODU-flex-1

    ODU-flex-2

    ODU-flex-3

    ODU-flex-4

    EthernetPort

    Logical Flow(VLAN #4)

    Logical Flow (VLAN #3)

    Logical Flow (VLAN #2)

    Logical Flow(VLAN #1)

    Port Shaper

    Routers

    ROADM/OXCMore flexibility for OTN

    Flexible grooming + OTN

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    10/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.10 | Taming | January 2011

    Before Flattening - Present Mode of Operation

    Separate andindependent IP and optical domains

    P Router

    ServicePE Routers

    PE Routers

    P Router

    P Router

    P Router ServicesApplications

    Gateways

    IP/MPLS Backbone

    OTN/DWDM

    OXC/ROADM

    OTNHub

    OpticalTransport

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    11/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.11 | Taming | January 2011

    After Flattening, using a unified control plane

    Mix of technologies to give best overall performance

    IP/MPLS Backbone

    Node 1

    RoutersRouters

    Services

    ApplicationsGateways

    OTN/DWDM

    OXC/ROADM

    OTN

    Hub

    Node 3Node 2

    On average equates to:

    lower latencyhigher bandwidthlower cost per bit

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    12/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.12 | Taming | January 2011

    Node 2

    Node 1

    Node 3

    After Flattening, using a unified control plane

    Example of one traffic stream

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    13/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.13 | Taming | January 2011

    Node 2

    Node 1

    Node 3

    After Flattening, using a unified control plane

    Example of another traffic stream

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    14/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.14 | Taming | January 2011

    Node 2

    Node 1

    Node 3

    After Flattening, using a unified control plane

    Example of a third traffic stream

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    15/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.15 | Taming | January 2011

    Belief #1: Network Flattening (NF) should be done at WDM layer, not ODU layer(via IPoDWDM with tunables on routers) to reduce complexity and the # of OXCs.

    Belief #2: You dont need to protect both IP and optical layers opticalprotection works for link failures, not router failures. Emphasis should be on IPlayer protection.

    Belief #3: As you make an optical device more dynamic, it tends towardsbecoming a router; with comparable capex, complexity and opex challenges.

    Belief #4: Network Flattening requires more router resources for protectionpurposes. Also, you need > 100% spare to account for potential types of failures.

    Belief #5: Router-OTN (mapping onto ODU layer) handoff is expensive andcomplex; and unlike the optical layer, MPLS LSPs can grow and shrink as trafficdictates.

    Belief #6: The adage of switch where you can, route where you must is stillpertinent: NF leads to much worse scalability problems since meshing of PE-routers becomes an O(N2) problem rather than O(N). Also, P-routers are able tostat-mux traffic better than PE-routers. Consequently the reliance on PE-routersas aggregators requires overprovisioning of the PE-routers.

    Engrained beliefs to be overcome

  • 7/30/2019 Flattening the Network

    16/16

    Copyright 2011 Alcatel-Lucent. All rights reserved.16 | Taming | January 2011

    Birds of a Feather in Denver

    Utilize P-Routers for what they do best Optimize resource sharing and distribution Increase network capacity fast Will save a darn lot of money once we get it to work

    [email protected]

    Cell during NANOG51: 214 675 0660

    Paramount Star Trek copyright ownership acknowledged

    Please join us for our

    BoF Session, NewNOG52, June