11
FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues

Winni Decking

DESY –MPY-

Page 2: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

FLASH II

Page 3: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

FLASH II Proposal

Page 4: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Principal Layout

Operation ModesSASE operation

Seeded schemes:HGHG operationHHG operationHybrid: HHG seed with HGHG stageEEHG under study

Page 5: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Layout

Page 6: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Extraction into FLASH II

• Preserve beam quality• Simultaneous operation of FLASH & FLASH II

– Kicker – Septum extraction– No optics changes– R56 = 0 to have similar compression behavior

• Arc should allow for energy collimation• Space for laser beam ‘injection’ • Foresee space for additional beamline (FLASH III)

Challenges:• Very limited space between ACC7, extraction and collimation• CSR induced projected emittance growth, especially important for

cascaded HGHG and HHG schemes

• See also BD meeting 2009.01.26 and others

Page 7: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

1st Layout of Extraction Arc

okay for SASE but to large projectedemittance growth (factor 4-8)

Page 8: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Principal Solutions

• Keep bends shorter than overtaking length and try to minimize dispersion downstream

• Avoid high betas where CSR transients still cause energy loss• Try cancellation effects with appropriate phase advance between

bending sections

• Optimization tends to minimum emittance cell solutions

Page 9: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Principal Solutions - Example

Triple bend achromat with total of 10 deg bending

Page 10: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

Open Questions

• Septum: Lambertson or Current-Sheet ?• FLASH Bypass or commissioning dump ?• Maintain FLASH collimation or move

Page 11: FLASH 2 Beam Dynamics Issues Winni Decking DESY –MPY-

Winni Decking

First Collection of Requirements (tbc)

Requirement Specifiation Priority

Intrabunchtrain switching 10 Hz switch with < 50 s rise high

Maximum Energy 1.6 GeV high

Minimum Energy 0.5 GeV high

Energy Bandwidth P2P > 1 % high

Max. projected emittance growth x 2 at low energy, x 1.5 at high to be verified

Max. energy spread EEHG smallest, SASE relaxed to be verified

Max. slice emittance growth about 10% medium

Max. slice energy spread    

Arc geometry: total angle 8-11 deg high

Arc gemeotry: total length to und 24 m low

Distance Kicker Septum 6 m medium

Collimators (beta & energy)   high

Extraction FLASH III   high

Trans. Feedback Kickers   medium

Tuneable R56 around zero   high