Upload
lorand
View
47
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Flare Observations from SDO EVE. Phillip C. Chamberlin - [email protected] NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory T. N. Woods, R. A. Hock, F. G. Eparvier U of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics D. L. Judge, L. Didkovsky, S. Wieman - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Flare Observations from SDO EVEFlare Observations from SDO EVEFlare Observations from SDO EVEFlare Observations from SDO EVE
Phillip C. ChamberlinPhillip C. Chamberlin - - [email protected]@nasa.gov
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics LaboratoryNASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Solar Physics Laboratory
T. N. Woods, R. A. Hock, F. G. EparvierT. N. Woods, R. A. Hock, F. G. EparvierU of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space PhysicsU of Colorado, Laboratory for Atmospheric and Space Physics
D. L. Judge, L. Didkovsky, S. WiemanD. L. Judge, L. Didkovsky, S. WiemanU of Southern California, Space Science LaboratoryU of Southern California, Space Science Laboratory
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
OutlineOutline
• The Extreme ultraviolet Variability Experiment - EVE
• Plot explanation and examples• Solar flares studied
• Impulsive phase differences (Short)• Long-term coronal heating (Long)• Comparisons to the Flare Irradiance Spectral
Model - FISM
• Conclusions and Future Work• Many questions to answer• Coordination is the key
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
Flares StudiedFlares StudiedEVE/AIA Science Team Meeting - July 2010EVE/AIA Science Team Meeting - July 2010• Medium magnitude flares with impulsive
phase.• June 12 - M2.0
• Small magnitude flare with no impulsive phase.• May 7 - C2.0
• Other flare studied but not shown here• May 5 - C8.8 • May 23-24 - B1.0
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
MEGS SpectrumMEGS Spectrum
• Use peak of contribution function (from CHIANTI 6.0) to pull out and combine lines.
• Normalized time series are then compiled.• Absolute energy analysis in the future.
MEGS A1MEGS A2MEGS BWarren, 2001
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
MEGS Temperature ContourMEGS Temperature Contour
• Time (X-axis) vs Temp (Y-axis)• X-axis: Hours (.Fraction of Hours)• Y-axis: Log(T) from 4.5 to 7.3 in 0.1 steps
• Use peak of contribution function for each of ~90 ions used
• Normalized values from Blue (0) to red to orange to yellow (1)
Tem
pera
ture
- lo
g(T
)
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
MEGS Temperature Time SeriesMEGS Temperature Time Series
• Normalized irradiance for each 0.1 log(T) bin from 4.5 to 7.3.• See impulsive phase enhancements in cooler emissions, and
cooling in hot emissions.• Smoothing to longer time scales to eliminate ‘noise’
• May be actual solar variations
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
ESP Time SeriesESP Time Series
• ESP contains broad-band diodes around a strong emission line - but are sensitive to many blends.
• 0.25 Second temporal resolution.• 0.1-7nm channel correlates with GOES XRS 0.1-
0.8nm (long) channel.
ESP BL9 Flight (2006) and Rocket (2008)
-1.00E-060.00E+001.00E-062.00E-063.00E-064.00E-065.00E-066.00E-067.00E-06
15 20 25
Wavelength, nm
Efficiency, cnt/ph
Ch8R
Ch8F
ESP BL9 Flight (2006) and Rocket (2008)
-5.00E-07
0.00E+00
5.00E-07
1.00E-06
1.50E-06
2.00E-06
25 30 35
Wavelength, nm
Efficiency, cnt/ph
Ch9R
Ch9F
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
June 12, 2010; M2.0 - AIAJune 12, 2010; M2.0 - AIA
Movie Courtesy K. Schrijver, LMSAL
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
June 12, 2010; M2.0 - ShortJune 12, 2010; M2.0 - Short
• Peak 00:57 UT; DOY 163• Gradual hot thermal emission decay for log(T)>6.8.• Coordinated 2nd Peaks (but, other small flares)• Impulsive phase seen in log(T) < 6.4
• 7 of 10 flares have an impulsive phase (larger)
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
June 12, 2010; M2.0 - LongJune 12, 2010; M2.0 - Long
• Peak 00:57 UT; DOY 163• Gradual hot thermal emission decay for log(T)>6.8.• Coordinated 2nd/3rd Peaks (but, other small flares).• Enhance 0.8-8MK plasma for ~5 hours after plots
end.
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 7, 2010; C2.0 - AIAMay 7, 2010; C2.0 - AIA
Movie Courtesy K. Schrijver, LMSAL
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 7, 2010; C2.0 - ShortMay 7, 2010; C2.0 - Short
• GOES XRS Peak: 7:42 UT; DOY 127.• 2 Soft X-Ray peaks with gradual thermal cooling.• No impulsive phase - 3/10 flare observed “Compact”?• RHESSI derived EM (White) and Temp (Black, /2).
• RHESSI and HINODE/EIS can provide more information
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 7, 2010; C2.0 - ShortMay 7, 2010; C2.0 - Short
• GOES X-Ray Peak: 7:42 UT; DOY 127.• 2 Soft X-Ray peaks with gradual thermal cooling.• No impulsive phase - 3/10 flare observed “Compact”?• EVE/ESP EUV emission all peak simultaneously and
after the Soft X-Ray (0.1-7nm) peaks.
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 7, 2010; C2.0 - LongMay 7, 2010; C2.0 - Long
• Peak: 7:42 UT; DOY 127• Long, gradual cooling (>13 hours)• But, increased emissions in later peak are still seen in
log(T)>7.0 - another, more gradual flare?
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 7, 2010; C2.0 - LongMay 7, 2010; C2.0 - Long
• Peak: 7:42 UT; DOY 127• Long, gradual cooling (>13 hours)• But, increased emissions in later peak are still seen in
log(T)>7.0 - another, more gradual flare?
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 5, 2010; C8.8 - FISMMay 5, 2010; C8.8 - FISM
• GOES XRS Peak 11:52 UT; DOY 125• EVE measurements more accurately represent all temperatures
• 10x spectral resolution• Impulsive and gradual phase are temperature dependent.
• FISM at 1nm bins can not account for all temperature ‘blends’ in its bin
• Late-phase in 1-6 MK emissions will not be modeled in FISM
Black: FISM 30.0-39.9 nm
Colors: EVE 0.1 nm bins
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
SummarySummary• There are many, interesting questions about flares
that can be addressed with the new EVE data.• ‘2nd’ Peak/Cooling/Multiple Reconnections• Coronal Dimming• Impulsive Phase Enhancements
• Maximum temperature of IP emissions (enhanced density)• Existence/Non-existence of impulsive phase
• AIA will be critical in determining what is happening to cause these variations.• Also SOHO SEM/CDS/SUMER, HINODE XRT/EIS,
RHESSI, LYRA, SOLAR, …..• Models will also help immensely
• EVE measurements will help improve FISM• Spectral resolution, accuracy, temperature dependencies
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 23-24, 2010; B1.0 - AIAMay 23-24, 2010; B1.0 - AIA
Movie Courtesy K. Schrijver, LMSAL
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 23-24, 2010; B1.0May 23-24, 2010; B1.0
• DOYs 143-144• Small but very long-duration• 1st peak ~coordinated in cooler and hot emissions• Delayed 1st peak and 2nd peak in 5.0<log(T)<6.3• Dimming seen in some emissions ~log(T)=6.3
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 5, 2010; C8.8 - AIAMay 5, 2010; C8.8 - AIA
Movie Courtesy K. Schrijver, LMSAL
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 5, 2010; C8.8 - ShortMay 5, 2010; C8.8 - Short
• GOES XRS Peak 11:52 UT; DOY 125• Gradual hot thermal emission decay for log(T)>6.8.• Impulsive phase only log(T) < 5.0• ESP 27-32 nm channel show early impulsive phase,
other EUV channels peak after soft X-ray channel
Aug
ust 2
, 201
0R
HE
SSI
X -
Ann
apol
is, M
D
May 5, 2010; C8.8 - LongMay 5, 2010; C8.8 - Long
• GOES XRS Peak 11:52 UT; DOY 125• Multiple late peaks, cooling or more energy release?• FISM will not be able to show these multiple peaks as
they are not seen in the GOES XRS proxy• May underestimate the 5-45 nm EUV emissions by 70% -
Woods et al., SPD, 2010.