Upload
katnev
View
53
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Flaps in Head & Neck Reconstruction
Contents
INTRODUCTION
HISTORY
RECONSTRUCTIVE LADDER
PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS
SKIN FLAP PHYSIOLOGY
CLASSIFICATION
LOCAL FLAPS
REGIONAL FLAPS
DISTANT FLAPS
FREE FLAPS
MONITORING OF FLAP
MEASURES TO INCREASE THE VIABILITY OF FLAPS
FATE OF FLAP
COMPLICATIONS
SALVAGING
REFERENCES
A flap is a unit of tissue that is transferred from one site (donor site) to another (recipient site) while maintaining its own blood supply.
1440 : Dutch word "flappe" : something that hung broad and loose, fastened only by one side
Introduction
Tansini first described the latissimus dorsi flap in 1896
Before 1963, oral and pharyngeal defects were closed primarily and reconstructed with random pattern skin flaps or tubed-pedicled flaps of skin from the trunk.
In 1973, Daniel and Taylor reported the first free flap,
In 1976, Panje and Harashina simultaneously described the use of free flaps to reconstruct defects of the oral cavity.
In the late 1980s and early 1990s, the use of osteocutaneous free flaps to reconstruct mandibular defects was advanced.
HISTORY
Reconstruction Ladder
The anatomy & physiology of skin, including color, texture, appearance & amount.
Local muscle anatomy : vascular, nerve supply & lymphatic drainage
The aesthetics of the area
Possible sites for incision placement
Areas of local tissue availability i.r.t the area to be reconstructed
Planning considerations
NEUROVASCULAR SUPPLY TO LOCAL SKIN FLAPS
•The sensory nerves are distributed in a segmental fashion•Sympathetic nerves – in the area of cutaneous arterioles•Precapillary sphincter- nutritive blood flow, local stimuli•Preshunt sphincter- thermoregulation, sympathetic stimulation
Segmental
Perforators
Cutaneous• Musculocutaneous• Septocutaneous
The subunit principle is only a starting point, but it is the foundation for adequate reconstruction of facial defects.
With the subunit principle, skin color, skin texture, skin thickness, hair growth, and surrounding contours at subunit junctions are considered; these features can provide optimal camouflage for incisions and transition
The facial subunits
Based on blood supply• Axial Random
Mathes and Nahai classification
CLASSIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION
By method of movement from the donor site• 1) Advancement flaps 2) Transposition flaps
3) Rotation flaps 4) Interposition flaps
By distance from donor site• Local Flaps• Regional flaps
By the tissues they contain• Skin flaps• Composite flap• Free flaps
Advancement flaps• Linear or rectangular configuration• Sub classification
• Single pedicle • Bipedicle• V-Y flaps
Single-pedicle advancement flap• A rectangle of skin is moved forwardly – elasticity of skin• The advancement creates a length discrepancy which creates
standing cone deformities
Local Flap
Bipedicle advancement flaps• Advanced into the adjacent defect in a
vector that is perpendicular to the flap axis• Used to close a defect in an area of high
visibility by moving the defect into an area of low visibility
The V-Y advancement flap• Pushed rather than stretched into the defect• The donor flap, which usually is triangular,
is advanced, and the resulting donor defect is closed in a straight line
• This approach results in a suture line with a Y configuration
Local Flap
Pivotal flaps• Moved about a pivotal point from the donor site to the
defect • Rotation • Transposition • Interpolation flaps
Interpolation flaps • The flap is moved about the pedicle and the pedicle rests
over the intervening tissue.• The most common interpolation flap is the forehead flap.
Local Flap
Rotation flaps• The leading edge of the flap also is a border of the defect• Based inferiorly to promote lymphatic drainage• The border perpendicular to the axis of rotation usually is
curvilinear and designed to contact at the junction of 2 facial subunits for optimal scar camouflage
• The length of the flap should be larger than the defect by a 4:1 ratio.
Local Flap
Transposition flaps• The flap is moved about the pedicle and transposed
over the intervening tissue into the defect• Versatile and offer a choice of flaps of similar color
and texture from various donor sites -defects in the head and neck
• In the head and neck the length-to-width ratio exceeds 3:1
Z-plasty • 2 transposition flaps with identical angles to the
direction of the defect and transposing them in opposite directions
Local Flap
Rhombic flaps –Limberg• specially designed transposition flap used to
correct a rhombus-shaped surgical defect• The classic rhombus defect has sides of equal
length, with 2 opposing 60° angles and 2 opposing 120° angles.
• This configuration creates a short diagonal of the same length as that of the sides of the rhombus.
The Dufourmentel flap is a variation of the classic Limberg rhombic flap with any 2 opposite angles rather than the 60° and 120° angles.
Local Flap
Bilobed flaps• 2 transposition flaps that share a common
pedicle• 1st -to reconstruct the defect• 2nd -to repair the donor site for the flap• The angle between each flap is 90°, with a
total transposition of 180°• Standing cone deformities, Pincushioning
Zitelli's modification – 45° & 90°• The key to the success of the bilobed flap
is the distribution of tension over both limbs of the flap.
Local Flap
Abbe cross-lip flap• 1/2-2/3 lip defects.• Flap width should approximate half width of excised
tissue. The recommended limit of flap width is 2 cm.• The flap blood supply is based upon the labial artery• The advantage is maintenance of sensory and motor
competent lip segment.• The disadvantage is second stage requirement and
relative microstomia.• Potential complications include vascular
compromise, vermilion notching, lip asymmetry, and scarring extension beyond the sublabial crease
Local Flap
Estlander flap• 1/2-2/3 lip defects.• The Estlander flap involves rotating the upper lip tissue
around the lateral edge of the mouth to correct defects involving the oral commissure.
• It is based upon the labial artery.• The flap maintains motor and sensory competence of
lip.• The pedicle is divided at 2-3 weeks• It requires commissure plasty at 3 months.
Local Flap
Karapandizic flap• A complete lip is formed by rotating the upper lip and
perioral tissue by bilateral advancement flaps.• The disadvantage of this technique is frequent loss of
sensory and motor innervation• Potential complications include microstomia, difficulty of
introducing full dentures, inversion of the vermilion and flattened mentolabial junction, and dysesthesia/anesthesia of the lip
Local Flap
Axial flap- to reconstruct defects below the level of eyes
Anterior branch of temporal A
Cutaneous axial median forehead flap- supratrochlear A
Uses :
• For nasal reconstruction – defects larges than 2.5 cm in length along the horizontal transverse plane.
• Defects of medial canthal region, upper or lower eyelids, medial cheek, melolabial region, upper lip
• In combination with other larger flaps – complex facial defects
FOREHEAD FLAPMcGregor
Eiselberg – 1901
Advantages • Adjacent tissue
• Excellent blood supply
• Low morbidity
• Reinnervated from adjacent host tissue
• Provide – 90 to 100 cm2 of mucosal surface for rotation
• Half of tongue can be used – without compromising the functions.
• Can be used in irradiated patients
TONGUE FLAPREGIONAL FLAPS
Vasculature : • Suprahyoid artery • Dorsal lingual artery • Sublingual artery • Deep lingual artery
Types :
I : Random flap design • a) Dorsal tongue flap
• - Posteriorly based – to treat defects of soft palate, retromolar region.
• - Anteriorly based – hard palate anterior buccal mucosa, anterior FOM, lips
TONGUE FLAPREGIONAL FLAPS
Lateral tongue flap
• Treatment of defects - buccal mucosa, lateral palate, alveolus, orointral communication
Double door tongue flap
• Used to reline large defects of buccal mucosa extending form the commissure to the anterior mandibular ramus.
TONGUE FLAPREGIONAL FLAPS
II. Axial flap design • Sliding posterior tongue flap
• Coverage of lateral tongue defect measuring 4-6 cm.
• Created by releasing the tongue from the hyoid bone and maintaining the dorsolingual branch of the lingual artery
TONGUE FLAPREGIONAL FLAPS
Blood supply – 3 sources :• Anterior deep temporal artery
• 21 % of the muscle • Middle temporal artery
• 38% of the muscle • Posterior deep temporal artery
• 41% of the muscle
TEMPORALIS FLAP Verneuil – 1872 – gap arthroplasty of TMJ
REGIONAL FLAPS
Uses • Obliteration of oral defects• Gap arthroplasty of TMJ• Cranial base reconstruction• Obliteration of orbital defects after enucleation• Facial reanimation• Midface suspension or orbital repair with the coronoid
process, attached to temporalis after maxillectomy
TEMPORALIS FLAP Verneuil – 1872 – gap arthroplasty of TMJ
REGIONAL FLAPS
TEMPORALIS FLAP
Advantages• Ease of elevation• Reliable blood supply• Proximity to maxillofacial
skeleton• Camouflage of incision within
hair line
Disadvantages• Sensory disturbance• Potential facial N injury• Temporal hollowing
REGIONAL FLAPS
Monks, Golovine and Brown – 1898 – repair eyelid and orbital defects, and perform auricular reconstruction
TPGF is pedicled on the superficial temporal vessels and is a component of the SMAS
TPGF can be made as wide as 14 cm on a 18 cm superficial temporal vascular pedicle.
Superficial temporal V is posterior & superior to A
Uniform location of vascular pedicle – micro vascular transfer
Temperoparietal Galea FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Uses• Obliteration of oral defects• Cranial base reconstruction• Obliteration of orbital defects after enucleation• Malar augmentation, maxillary & mandibular reconstruction
with vascularised osseous cranial bone• As a skin island flap- hair bearing upper lip/ brow
reconstuction
Temperoparietal Galea FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Temperoparietal Galea Flap
Advantages• Relatively constant & reliable
blood supply• Ultrathin ~ 2-4 mm• Surface area ~ 120 cm.sq• Lack of hair• Well camouflaged donor site
Disadvantages• Limited rotation• Lack of skin paddle for flap
monitoring• Numbness of donor site• Potential for development of
alopecia
REGIONAL FLAPS
In 1987 – Tiwari –as a cross-over flap in the tonsillar repair and retromolar trigone
Origin:• Superficial – anterior 2/3 lower border of zygomatic arch• Deep – inner surface of zygomatic
Insertion:• Superficial – lower portion of mandibular ramus • Deep – lateral surface of the coronoid process
Innervations:• Masseteric nerve (CN V3)
Blood supply:• Masseteric artery (internal maxillary artery)
Masseter FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Uses• Reconstruction of ablative procedures of parotid gland,
mandible, palate and nasopharyma
Advantages• Usefull, readily available local tissue for site specific defects of
oral cavity
Disadvantages• Limited tissue volume• Potential for devolopment of trismus• Training for emotional mimetic movement• Limited arc of rotation
Masseter FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
1887 – 1st used by – Gersony– through and through cheek defect.
1951 – Edgerton – lateral cervical island flap
1959 – Desprez and Klehn modified apron flap
Arterial supply• Anterior superior
• Sub mental A
• Posterior superior • Occipital and posterior auricular arteries
• Anterior midportion • Superior thyroid artery
• Inferiorly• Transverse or superficial cervical arteries
• Skin • Fasciocutaneous perforators
Plastysma Myocutaneous FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Venous drainage• Postrior- EJV• AJV, sub mental V, anterior communicating V
Innervation• Cervical branches of 7th CN
Contraindications• Previous radiotherapy to neck• Dominant blood supply violated due to previous surgery• Muscle previously transected
Flap designs• Posteriorly based• Superiorly based• Inferiorly based
Plastysma Myocutaneous FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Occipital A- fascia at the anterior border of SCM
Collaterals- sup. Thyroid & post. Auricular A
EJV
Arc of rotation is suitable for reconstruction of • Lower lip• FOM• Ventral tongue• Lower 1/3rd of face
SOND / SND – preserving SCM & associated fascia
Posteriorly Plastysma Myocutaneous Flap
REGIONAL FLAPS
Dominant A – submental branch of facial A near inferior border of mandible
Submental V
Arc of rotation is suitable for reconstruction of • Ant. & lateral FOM• Buccal mucosa• Retromolar trigone• Skin of lower cheek & parotid region• Facial animation- Cervical branch of 7th CN
Superiorly Plastysma Myocutaneous Flap
REGIONAL FLAPS
Plastysma Myocutaneous Flap
Advantages• Good color match• Easy access to donor site• Minimal donor site morbidity• Easy primary closure of donor
site• Appropriate flap thickness for
oral & facial defects
Disadvantages• Blood supply unreliable• When based on submental A,
requires preservation of muscularity in a area of oncologic significance which may have to be addressed in resection
• Removal of platysma interferes with the blood supply to the overlying skin, which can have disastrous results
REGIONAL FLAPS
Sushrutha samhitha, 700 BC
Diffenbach , 1830- nasal alae reconstruction
Nasolabial crease• 1cm superior- lateral alar rim• 1cm lateral- corner of mouth• Medially- orbicularis oris muscle• Superior & lateral – cheek
Buccal & zygomatic branches of facial N
Nasolabial Flap REGIONAL FLAPS
Facial A
Uses• Reconstructing perioral defects
• Upper or lower lips• Comissure • Buccal mucosa
• Full thickness defects immediately following trauma• Reconstruction of upper lip scarring secondary to
trauma
Inferiorly Based Nasolabial Flap REGIONAL FLAPS
Infra-orbital & transverse facial A
Used to reconstruct• Maxillary lip• Buccal mucosa • Nasal defect• Columella• Moderately sized maxillary defect
Superiorly Based Nasolabial FlapREGIONAL FLAPS
Origin • Medial 11/2 – 2/3 of clavicle• Lateral portion of entire sternum• Adjacent cartilages of first 6 ribs• Bony portion of 4th ,5th ,6th ribs
Insertion• Intertubercular groove of humerus
Action• Abducts , Flexes & Medially Rotates Arm
Pectoralis Major FlapAryian 1977
DISTANT FLAPS
Segmental subunits- PMMC
Clavicular • Arises from clavicle• Deltoid branch of thoracoacromial A• Lateral pectoral N
Sternocostal segment • Most muscle mass• Pectoral branch of thoracoacromial A & parasternal
perforators of internal mammary A• Lateral pectoral N
External segment • Medial pectoral N• Lateral thoracic A / Pectoral branch of thoracoacromial
A/ combination
DISTANT FLAPS
Pectoralis Major Flap
Advantages • Familiar, accessible• Large skin territory• Rich vascular supply• Large arc of rotation• Used with other flaps
Disadvantages• Bulk• Nerve sectioning• Poor colour match• In females , breast size limits
its use• Hair bearing
DISTANT FLAPS
Complications- PMMC
Recipient site• Flap necrosis• Poor healing• Infections• Fistulization• seroma
Donor site• Uncontrolled bleeding• Hematoma• Wound dehiscence• Infection & seroma
Rarely • Rib osteomyletis• Seeding of tumor• Metastasis
DISTANT FLAPS
Origin • Clavicular head• Sternal head
Insertion• Mastoid process of temporal bone
Innervation • Spinal accessory N• Proprioception – cervical spinal N
Blood supply• Occipital A / direct from ECA• Superior thyroid A• Transverse cervical A
Sternocleidomastoid flapowens 1955DISTANT FLAPS
Flap types• Composite skin muscle flap• Myocutaneous skin island flap• Composite muscle – bone flap
Use• Reconstruction- oral cavity, cheek lip• Particularly as superiorly based muscle flap –
small defects of pharynx & oral cavity• Split along its length & rotated anteriorly – to
cover vessels of compromised neck
Sternocleidomastoid flapDISTANT FLAPS
Sternocleidomastoid Flap
Advantages• Accessible• Good colour match• Proximity to defect site• Lack of requirement of
another incision when used in conjunction with neck dissection
• Good thickness tissue coverage
Disadvantages• Upper scm composite skin
flap is poorly viable• Vascularity of lower muscle
flap is unreliable• Upper & lower ends are of
oncologic significance
DISTANT FLAPS
Perforator flap
Based on lateralcircumflex thoracic A- descending branch
Pedicle descends down b/w rectus femoralis & vastus lateralis muscles
Venous drainage- 2 vena comitans of LCFA
Sensate flap – lateral cutaneous N of thigh
Anterolateral Thigh FlapSong 1984
DISTANT FLAPS
Anterolateral Thigh Flap
Uses
Thicker flaps• Total glossectomy• Hypopharyngeal defects• Laterl temporal defects
Thinner flaps• Orophyngeal /• Hypopharyngeal
reconstruction
Contraindicatios• Previous thigh injury• Prior surgery of upper thigh
DISTANT FLAPS
Anterolateral Thigh Flap
Advantages• Low donor site morbidity• Primary closure• Two team approach• Long vascular pedicle ~15cm• Large vessels ~ 2-4 cm• Large skin paddle ~ 10 x 20 cm• Pliable, hairless skin
Disadvantages• Elevation difficulty –
musculocutaneous perforator• Obese pt, esp. women – bulky• Inconsistent vascular pedicle
– transverse branch
DISTANT FLAPS
Is an axial pattern flap
Composed of fascia, subcutaneous tissue and skin; muscle is not transferred with this flap
Boundaries• Clavicle superiorly• Acromium laterally• A line running through the anterior axillary fold
to above the nipple inferiorly
Based medially on the upper chest in the upper 3 or 4 perforating branches of internal mammary A from medial end of intercostal spaces
DELTOPECTORAL FALP Bakanjian –1965
DISTANT FLAPS
Extends to any site in neck & occasionally up to zygoma
Flexibility of the flap• Retracts from side to side• Anomolous pivot point
Uses• To cover whole anterior neck without any subsequent
revision• To reconstruct a defect by passing as a bridge over normal
tissues where conventionally the pedicle may be tubed• Repair of pharyngeal fistula but lacks muscle bulk• Reconstruct defects – lower face & upper neck
Deltopectoral FalpDISTANT FLAPS
Deltopectoral Falp
Advantages• Usually not delayed• Unilateral or bilateral• Deltoid portion usually not
hair bearing• Excellent blood supply,
with dependent venous drainage
• Donor site hidden, thus cosmetically acceptable
• Outside radiation field
Disadvantages• Failure rate is 9 to 18%.• If flap is used to cover the
carotid vessels, blow out of the carotid artery is a hazard if the flap fails.
DISTANT FLAPS
Tanzini,1896- 1st myocutaneous flap in medical literature
Quillen,1978- head & neck reconstruction
Origin• Sacrum & lumbar vertebrae• Posterior iliac crest• Lower 6 thoracic vertebrae• Slips from lower 3 ribs
Insertion• Intertubercular groove of humerus
Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous FlapDISTANT FLAPS
Thoracodorsal vessels from subscapular A
Venacommitans draining into axillary V
10 x 8 cm- easily harvested with primary closure
Musculocutaneous flap ~ 40 x 20 cm – skin grafting
As a free tissue- dividing circumflex scapular A , pedicle – 10cm long, 3 mm diameter
Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous FlapDISTANT FLAPS
Latissimus Dorsi Myocutaneous Flap
Advantages• Large amount of tissue can be
transferred• Pedicled or free tissue transfer• Cosmetic advantage, esp.
females• Versatile ; tubed/ multiple/
osseous components• When pedicled can reach
upper face & scalp
Disadvantages• Very bulky• Occasional donor site
dehiscence• Reduction in upper limb
power• Need to move pt to harvest.
DISTANT FLAPS
Criteria for selection• The length & diameter of vascular pedicle available• The type, thickness & color match of the skin required• Whether associated tendon, fascia or nerves are needed• Whether a large composite free flap is required• The morbidity caused by harvesting the flap should be
considered
Free Flap
As a fasciocutaneous flap- volar forearm skin, antebrachial fascia & intermuscular fascia containing vascular pedicle.
Radial A- deep palmer branch of hand , b/w brachis radialis & flexor carpi radialis muscle
Ulnar A- superficial palmer branch of hand• Anastomosis –prevents ischemia & necrosis of hand
particularly index finger & thumb• Allens test
Venae comitantes {1-2mm} / cephalic vein{3-4mm}
Radial Forearm Free Flap1978-China
As a sensate flap- Lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve
Composite flap - bone, tendon, brachioradialis muscle and vascularized nerve.
Use • Oral cavity, base of tongue, pharynx, soft palate, cutaneous
defects, base of skull, small volume bone and soft tissue defects of face
Radial Forearm Free Flap
Radial Forearm Free Flap
Advantages• Consistent vascular anatomy• Up to 20 cm long• Vessel caliber 2 – 2.5 mm• Location allows 2 team
approach• Pedicle can be outlined prior
to incision• Composite flap• Acceptable donor site
cosmesis
Disadvantages• Partial skin graft loss• Tendon exposure• Delayed healing of STSG
donor site• # radius at harvest• Sensory loss in distribution of
superficial radial N• Restricted forearm function
Tubular shaped with Thick cortical bone
Nutrient A from peroneal A – enters the medial surface of bone just above its midpoint
Pedicle up to 8cm
Venacommitans
Fasciocutaneous- skin paddle centered over intermuscular septum & including deep fascia
The Free Fibula Flap Hidalgo 1989
The Free Fibula Flap
Indications • Short & long, anterior &
lateral segment reconstruction of mandible
• Reconstruction of hemimandible
• Ideal – angle to angle mandibular reconstruction
Contraindication • Peripheral vascular disease
Complications • Partial loss of donor site
STSG• Ankle stiffness• Donor site pain• Ankle instability• Peroneal N motor & sensory
loss• Decreased knee extension• Decreased flexion strength
The Free Fibula Flap
Advantages• Good vessel quality with
regard to both length & diameter
• Up to 27cm of bone• Segmental & intraosseous
blood supply- multiple osteotomies
• Long bicortical bone- osseointegration
• Allows for reshaping of bone• Two team approach
Disadvantages• Ltd cutaneous paddle• Soft tissue bulk often
requiring a second free flap
In 1978, Saijo was 1st to describe the scapular fasciocutaneous flap anatomy based on the circumflex scapular artery (CSA).
This donor site was popularized for head and neck reconstruction by Swartz et al in 1986
Based on the subscapular artery and vein, branches of the third part of the axillary artery and vein.
Scapular Flaps
Indications:• Oromandibular defects, • scalp defects, • Palatal / midface defects
Flaps based on the subscapular arterial system• Scapular/parascapular fasciocutaneous flap • Scapular/parascapular osteocutaneous flap • Latissimus dorsi muscle flap • Latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flap • Serratus anterior muscle flap • Serratus anterior musculocutaneous flap • Dorsal thoracic fascia flap
Scapular Flaps
Osteocutaneous, osteomusculocutaneous
Segmental mandibular defects
Up to 16 cm bone
Oromandibular reconstruction
No motor or sensate reconstruction
With or without simultaneous implant placement.
Skin paddle is not ideal for relining the oral cavity as it is too thick
Denervated muscle undergoes atrophy that leaves a thin, fixed, soft tissue coverage over the bone.
Iliac crest flaps
Deep circumflex iliac artery from lateral aspect of external iliac artery
1 – 2 cm cephalic to inguinal ligament
Ascending branch of deep circumflex iliac artery supplies internal oblique muscle
Pedicle to internal oblique can arise separately from deep circumflex iliac artery
Deep circumflex iliac vein – 2 venae comitantes
Can pass either superficial to deep to artery
Iliac crest flaps
Signs of abnormal perfusion• Arterial compromise
• Skin – Pale, slow capillary refill; cool.• Muscle – Pale; no brisk bleeding; skin graft not adherent; no
doppler signal.• Fascia – No palpable pulse; skin graft not adherent; no doppler
signal.• Venous compromise
• Skin – patchy; bluish fast capillary refill; cool.• Muscle – Dark; dark red bleeding; skin graft not adherent.• Fascia – Dark; greyish, doppler signal may remain normal for
a longer period
Monitoring of Flaps
Inflow• Arterial kinking• Inset too tight• Damage to pedicle• Arterial insufficiency• Thrombosis in extremity.
Outflow• Venous occlusion• Tunnel too tight.• Venous thrombosis in major veins.• Kinking of pedicle.
Hematoma under flap
Possible causes of impaired perfusion
Clinical tests:• Skin colour• Temperature of flap• Capillary refill and bleeding characteristics
Chemical methods• Fluorescein (resorcinol pthalein)• Atropine – subcutaneous injection in flap to check the systemic effects.• Fiberoptic flurometry• Fiberoptic dermoflourometer – with flourescein delivery.
Radioisotopic methods• 24Na, 131I, 99mTc, 133Xe
Instrumental methods• Temperature• Transcutaneous gas measurements.• Photoelectric method – photoplathysmography & reflection spectophotometry.• Doppler shift flowmetry• Electromagnetic flowmetry• Interstitial fluid pressure measurement.
Monitors for Cutaneous Microcirculation
ATTEMPTS TO ALTER SKIN FLAP VIABILITY
Incise and undermine• 10 to 21 day delay most common• No benefit at 3 wks to 3 mos• Improved blood supply
• AV shunt closure• Conditioning to ischemia• Alignment of vessel
Delay in Flaps
Delay• Four facts are accepted about the delay phenomenon
• Surgical trauma to flap• Large percentage of the neurovascular supply to the flap must be
eliminated. • Delay results in increased flap survival at the time of tissue transfer. • Beneficial effects can last upto 6 weeks.
Three theories • Delay improves blood flow
• Depletion of vasoconstricting substances • Formation of collateral and reorientation of vascular channels • Stimulation of inflammatory response • Release of vasodilating substance
• Conditions tissue to ischemia • Closure of arteriovenous shunts
In surviving flaps, the blood flow gradually increases if the flap is in a favorable recipient site,
A fibrin layer forms with in the first 2 days.
Neovascularization of the flap begins 3 to 7 days after flap transposition.
Revascularization adequate for division of the flap pedicle by 7th day
The return of blood flow to a flap that is ischemic due to excessive release of norepinephrine occurs in approximately 12 – 48 hours.
Fate of flap
CAUSES OF FLAP COMPLICATIONS
Preoperative• Poor flap design • Pre morbid condition
of the patient
Intraoperative • Technical errors.• Design errors• Poor choice of
recipent vessels
Post operative • Extrinsic
• Pedicle kinking • Infection• Vascular thrombosis
• Intrinsic• Distal ischemia
Releasing the sutures to relieve any tension which may be compromising the circulation
Venous congestion can be relieved by elevating the flap or changing it from a dependent position
Hynes (1951) designed a mechanical intermittent ve nous occluder device, which could be applied to the distal end of the flap
Leeches
Cooling
Hyperbaric oxygen
Dextran
SALVAGING THE FLAPS OF MARGINAL VIABILITY.
Head & Neck Surgery- Stell & Maran
Grabb’s Encyclopedia of Head and Neck Reconstruction:1998
Plastic Surgery, McCarthy, Vol 5 , Tumours of Head & Neck
Cancer of Face and the Mouth, Pathology and management for surgeon - Mcgregor.
Basic principles of oral and maxillofacial surgery, Peterson
Facial Plastic and Reconstructive surgery, Ira A Papel. 1992
Local Flaps in Facial Reconstruction, Shan Ray Baker & Neil A Swanson
Maxillofacial Surgery Vol 2; P W Booth, Stephen A Schendel
OCNA- 1994, August 2001
OMFSCNA- NOV 2003
AOMFSC- SEPT 2006, MARCH 2007
References