Five-Year plans of IndiaFrom Wikipedia, the free encyclopediaJump to: navigation, search

This article may require cleanup to meet Wikipedia's quality standards. No cleanup reason has been specified. Please help improve this article if you can. (October 2007)

Indian economy is based on the concept of planning. This is carried through her five-year plans, developed, executed and monitored by the Planning Commission. With the Prime Minister as the ex-officio Chairman, the commission has a nominated Deputy Chairman, who has rank of a Cabinet Minister. Montek Singh Ahluwalia is currently the Deputy Chairman of the Commission. The eleventh plan completed its term in March 2012 and the twelfth plan is currently underway.[1] Prior to the fourth plan, the allocation of state resources was based on schematic patterns rather than a transparent and objective mechanism, which led to the adoption of the Gadgil formula in 1969. Revised versions of the formula have been used since then to determine the allocation of central assistance for state plans.[2]

Contents [hide] 

1 History 2 Second Plan (1956-1961) 3 Third Plan (1961–1966) 4 Fourth Plan (1969–1974) 5 Fifth Plan (1974–1979) 6 Sixth Plan (1980–1985) 7 Seventh Plan (1985–1990) 8 Eighth Plan (1992–1997) 9 Ninth Plan (1998 - 2002) 10 Tenth Plan (2002–2007) 11 Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012) 12 Twelfth Plan (2012–2017) 13 See also 14 References 15 External links

History[edit]Five-Year Plans (FYPs) are centralized and integrated national economic programs. Joseph Stalin implemented the first FYP in the Soviet Union in the late 1920s. Most communist states and several capitalist countries subsequently have adopted them. China and India both continue to use FYPs, although China renamed its Eleventh FYP, from 2006 to 2010, a guideline (guihua), rather than a plan (jihua), to signify the central government’s more hands-off approach to development. India launched its First FYP in 1951, immediately after independence under socialist influence of first Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru.[3]

The first Five-Year Plan was one of the most important because it has a great role in the launching of Indian development after the Independence. Thus, it strongly supported agriculture production and it also launched the industrialization of the country (but less than the Second Plan, which focused on heavy industries). It built a particular system of "Mixed economy", with a great role for the public sector (with an emerging Welfare State), as well as a growing private sector (represented by some personalities as those who published the Bombay Plan).

==no planingzz..!!

(1951-1956)==

The first Five-year Plan Sought to get country out of the poverty cycle. K.N Raj a young economist involved in drafting the plan, argued that India Should "hasten slowly" for first two decades as a fast rate of development might endanger democracy. (source: Gunika Duggal)

The first Indian Prime Minister, Jawaharlal Nehru presented the first five-year plan to the Parliament of India and needed urgent attention.[4] The total planned budget of 20.69 billion was allocated to seven broad areas: irrigation and energy (27.2 percent), agriculture and community development (17.4 percent), transport and communications (24 percent), industry (8.4 percent), social services (16.64 percent), land rehabilitation (4.1 percent), and for other sectors and services (2.5 percent).[5] The most important feature of this phase was active role of state in all economic sectors. Such a role was justified at that time because immediately after independence, India was facing basic problems—deficiency of capital and low capacity to save.

The target growth rate was 2.1% annual gross domestic product (GDP) growth; the achieved growth rate was 3.6%[6] The net domestic product went up by 15%. The monsoon was good and there were relatively high crop yields, boosting exchange reserves and the per capita income, which increased by 8%. National income increased more than the per capita income due to rapid population growth. Many irrigation projects were initiated during this period, including the Bhakra Dam and Hirakud Dam. The World Health Organization, with the Indian government, addressed children's health and reduced infant mortality, indirectly contributing to population growth.

At the end of the plan period in 1956, five Indian Institutes of Technology (IITs) were started as major technical institutions. The University Grant Commission was set up to take care of funding and take measures to strengthen the higher education in the country.[7] Contracts were signed to start five steel plants, which came into existence in the middle of the second five-year plan.

More generally, the first Five-year plan included: Industrial sector, Energy and Irrigation, Transport and Communications, Land rehabilitation, Social services, Developments of agriculture and community, Miscellaneous issues in India.

The target set for the growth in the gross domestic product was 2.1 percent every year. In reality, the actual achieved with regard to gross domestic product was 3.6% per year.[6] This is a clear indication of the success of the first Five-year Plan.

Some important events that took place during the tenure of the 1st five-year plan: The following Irrigation projects were started during that period: Metttur Dam, Hirakud Dam, Bhakra Dam.

The government had taken steps to rehabilitate the landless workers, whose main occupation was agriculture. These workers were also granted fund for experimenting and undergoing training in agricultural know how in various cooperative institutions. Soil conservation, was also given considerable importance. The Indian government also made considerable effort in improving posts and telegraphs, railway services, road tracks, civil aviation. Sufficient fund was also allocated for the industrial sector. In addition measures were taken for the growth of the small scale industries.

1st three plans (1951-1965) had industrial growth of 8% sturdy growth. The Atomic Energy Commission was formed in 1948 with Homi J. Bhabha as the first chairman till 1966. India started family planning in 1952.

Second Plan (1956-1961)[edit]The second plan, particularly in the development of the public sector. The plan followed the Mahalanobis model, an economic development model developed by the Indian statistician Prasanta Chandra Mahalanobis in 1953. The plan attempted to determine the optimal allocation of investment between productive sectors in order to maximise long-run economic growth. It used the prevalent state of art techniques of operations research and optimization as well as the novel applications of statistical models developed at the Indian Statistical Institute. The plan assumed a closed economy in which the main trading activity would be centered on importing capital goods.[8][9]

Hydroelectric power projects and five steel mills at Bhilai, Durgapur, and Rourkela were established. Coal production was increased. More railway lines were added in the north east.

The Tata Institute of Fundamental Research was established as a research institute. In 1957 a talent search and scholarship program was begun to find talented young students to train for work in nuclear power.

The total amount allocated under the second five-year plan in India was Rs.48 billion. This amount was allocated among various sectors: Power and irrigation, Social services, Communications and transport, Miscellaneous.

The target growth rate was 4.5% and the actual growth rate was 4.27%.[6] 1956-industrial policy

Third Plan (1961–1966)[edit]The third Five-year Plan stressed agriculture and improvement in the production of wheat, but the brief Sino-Indian War of 1962 exposed weaknesses in the economy and shifted the focus towards the defence industry and the Indian Army. In 1965–1966, India fought a War with Pakistan. There was also a severe drought in 1965. The war led to inflation and the priority was shifted to price stabilisation. The construction of dams continued. Many cement and fertilizer plants were also built. Punjab began producing an abundance of wheat.

Many primary schools were started in rural areas. In an effort to bring democracy to the grass-root level, Panchayat elections were started and the states were given more development responsibilities.

State electricity boards and state secondary education boards were formed. States were made responsible for secondary and higher education. State road transportation corporations were formed and local road building became a state responsibility.

The target growth rate was 5.6%, but the actual growth rate was 2.4%.[6]

Due to miserable failure of third plan the government was forced to declare "plan holidays" (from 1966–67,1968–69). Three annual plans were drawn during this intervening period .During 1966-67 there was again the problem of drought. Equal priority was given to agriculture, its allied activities, and industrial sector. The main reasons for plan holidays were the war, lack of resources, and increase in inflation.

Fourth Plan (1969–1974)[edit]At this time Indira Gandhi was the Prime Minister. The Indira Gandhi government nationalised 14 major Indian banks and the Green Revolution in India advanced agriculture. In addition, the situation in East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) was becoming dire as the Indo-Pakistan War of 1971 and Bangladesh Liberation War took funds earmarked for industrial development had to be diverted for the war effort. India also performed the Smiling Buddha underground nuclear test in 1974, partially in response to the United States deployment of the Seventh Fleet in the Bay of Bengal. The fleet had been deployed to warn India against attacking West Pakistan and extending the war.

The target growth rate was 5.6%, but the actual growth rate was 3.3%.[6]

Fifth Plan (1974–1979)[edit]The fifth Five-year Plan laid stress on employment, poverty alleviation (Garabi Hatao), and justice. The plan also focused onself-reliance in agricultural production and defence. In 1978 the newly elected Morarji Desai government rejected the plan. The Electricity Supply Act was amended in 1975, which enabled the central government to enter into power generation and transmission.[10][citation needed]

The Indian national highway system was introduced and many roads were widened to accommodate the increasing traffic. Tourism also expanded.

The target growth rate was 4.4% and the actual growth rate was 5.0.[6]

Sixth Plan (1980–1985)[edit]The sixth Five-year Plan marked the beginning of economic liberalisation. Price controls were eliminated and ration shops were closed. This led to an increase in food prices and an increase in the cost of living. This was the end of Nehruvian socialism.

Family planning was also expanded in order to prevent overpopulation. In contrast to China's strict and binding one-child policy, Indian policy did not rely on the threat of force[citation needed]. More prosperous areas of India adopted family planning more rapidly than less prosperous areas, which continued to have a high birth rate. The sixth Five-year Plan was a great success to Indian economy.

The target growth rate was 5.2% and the actual growth rate was 5.4%.[6]

Seventh Plan (1985–1990)[edit]The seventh Five-year Plan marked the comeback of the Congress Party to power. The plan laid stress on improving the productivity level of industries by upgrading of technology.

The main objectives of the seventh Five-year Plan were to establish growth in areas of increasing economic productivity, production of food grains, and generating employment. target growth of 8 %

As an outcome of the sixth Five-year Plan, there had been steady growth in agriculture, controls on the rate of inflation, and favourable balance of payments which had provided a strong base for the seventh Five-year Plan to build on the need for further economic growth. The seventh plan had strived towards socialism and energy production at large. The thrust areas of the seventh Five-year Plan were: Social Justice, Removal of oppression of the weak, Using modern technology, Agricultural development, Anti-poverty programs, Full supply of food, clothing, and shelter, Increasing productivity of small- and large-scale farmers, and Making India an Independent Economy.

Based on a 15-year period of striving towards steady growth, the seventh plan was focused on achieving the pre-requisites of self-sustaining growth by the year 2000. The plan expected a growth in labour force by 39 million people and employment was expected to grow at the rate of 4% per year. Some of the expected outcomes of the Seventh Five Year Plan India are given below:

Balance of Payments (estimates): Export – 330 billion (US$5.0 billion), Imports – (-)540 billion (US$8.3 billion), Trade Balance – (-) 210 billion (US$3.2 billion)

Merchandise exports (estimates): 606.53 billion (US$9.3 billion) Merchandise imports (estimates): 954.37 billion (US$14.6 billion) Projections for Balance of Payments: Export – 607 billion (US$9.3 billion), Imports

– (-) 954 billion (US$14.6 billion), Trade Balance- (-) 347 billion (US$5.3 billion)

Under the seventh Five-year Plan, India strove to bring about a self-sustained economy in the country with valuable contributions from voluntary agencies and the general populace.

The target growth rate was 5.0% and the actual growth rate was 6.01%.[11]

Eighth Plan (1992–1997)[edit]1989–91 was a period of economic instability in India and hence no five-year plan was implemented. Between 1990 and 1992, there were only Annual Plans. In 1991, India faced a crisis in Foreign Exchange (Forex) reserves, left with reserves of only about US$1 billion.

Thus, under pressure, the country took the risk of reforming the socialist economy. P.V. Narasimha Rao was the ninth Prime Minister of the Republic of India and head of Congress Party, and led one of the most important administrations in India's modern history overseeing a major economic transformation and several incidents affecting national security. At that time Dr. Manmohan Singh (currently, Prime Minister of India) launched India's free market reforms that brought the nearly bankrupt nation back from the edge. It was the beginning of privatisation and liberalisation in India.

Modernization of industries was a major highlight of the Eighth Plan. Under this plan, the gradual opening of the Indian economy was undertaken to correct the burgeoning deficit and foreign debt. Meanwhile India became a member of the World Trade Organization on 1 January 1995.This plan can be termed as Rao and Manmohan model of Economic development. The major objectives included, controlling population growth, poverty reduction, employment generation, strengthening the infrastructure, Institutional building, tourism management, Human Resource development, Involvement of Panchayat raj, Nagar Palikas, N.G.O'S and Decentralisation and people's participation. Energy was given priority with 26.6% of the outlay. An average annual growth rate of 6.78% against the target 5.6%[6] was achieved.

To achieve the target of an average of 5.6% per annum, investment of 23.2% of the gross domestic product was required. The incremental capital ratio is 4.1.The saving for investment was to come from domestic sources and foreign sources, with the rate of domestic saving at 21.6% of gross domestic production and of foreign saving at 1.6% of gross domestic production. [12]

Ninth Plan (1998 - 2002)[edit]The Ninth Five Year Plan came after 50 years of completion of Indian Independence. Atal Bihari Vajpayee was the Prime Minister of India during the Ninth Five Year Plan. The Ninth Five Year Plan tried primarily to use the latent and unexplored economic potential of the country to promote economic and social growth. The Ninth Five Year Plan offered strong support to the social spheres of the country in an effort to achieve complete elimination of poverty. The satisfactory implementation of the Eighth Five Year Plan also ensured in the States ability to proceed on the path of faster development. The Ninth Five Year Plan also saw joint efforts from the public and the private sectors in ensuring economic development of the country. In addition, the Ninth Five Year Plan saw contributions towards development from the general public as well as Governmental agencies in both the rural and urban areas of the country. New implementation measures in the form of Special Action Plans (SAPs) were evolved during the Ninth Five Year Plan to fulfill targets within the stipulated time with adequate resources. The SAPs covered the areas of social infrastructure, agriculture, information technology and Water policy.

Budget

The Ninth Five Year Plan had a total Public Sector Plan outlay of ₹ 8,59,200 crores. The Ninth Five Year Plan also saw a hike of 48% in terms of plan expenditure and 33% in terms of the plan outlay in comparison to that of the Eighth Five Year Plan. In the total outlay, the share of the Centre was approximately 57% while it was 43% for the States and the Union Territories.

The Ninth Five Year Plan focused the relationship between the rapid economic growth and the quality of life for the people of the country. The prime focus of the Ninth Five Year Plan was to increase growth in the country with an emphasis on social justice and equity. The Ninth Five Year Plan paid considerable importance on combining growth oriented policies with the mission of achieving the desired objective of improving policies which would work towards the improvement of the poor in the country. The Ninth Five Year Plan also aimed at correcting the historical inequalities which were still prevalent in the society.

Objectives

The main objective of the Ninth Five Year Plan was to correct historical inequalities and increase the economic growth in the country. Other aspects which constituted the Ninth Five Year Plan were as follows:

1. Population control.

2. Generating employment by giving priority to agriculture and rural development.

3. Reduction of poverty.

4. Ensuring proper availability of food and water for the poor.

5. Availability of primary health care facilities and other basic necessities.

6. Primary education to all children in the country.

7. Empowering the socially disadvantaged classes like Scheduled castes, Scheduled tribes and other backward classes.

8. Developing self-reliance in terms of agriculture.

9. Acceleration in the growth rate of the economy with the help of stable prices.

Strategies

• Structural transformations and developments in the Indian economy.

• New initiatives and initiation of corrective steps to meet the challenges in the economy of the country.

• Efficient use of scarce resources to ensure rapid growth.

• Combination of public and private support to increase employment.

• Enhancing high rates of export to achieve self-reliance.

• Providing services like electricity, telecommunication, railways etc.

• Special plans to empower the socially disadvantaged classes of the country.

• Involvement and participation of Panchayati Raj institutions/bodies and Nagar Palikas in the development process.

Performance

• The Ninth Five Year Plan achieved a Gross Domestic Product (GDP) growth rate of 5.4% against a target of 6.5%

• The agriculture industry grew at a rate of 2.1% against the target of 4.2%

• The industrial growth in the country was 4.5% which was higher than that of the target of 3%

• The service industry had a growth rate of 7.8%.

• An average annual growth rate of 6.7% was reached.

The Ninth Five Year Plan India looks through the past weaknesses in order to frame the new measures for the overall socio-economic development of the country. However, for a well-planned economy of any country, there should be a combined participation of the governmental agencies along with the general population of that nation. A combined effort of public, private, and all levels of government is essential for ensuring the growth of India's economy. The target growth was 7.1% and the actual growth was 6.8%.

Tenth Plan (2002–2007)[edit]The main objectives of the tenth Five Year Plan of India were:

Attain 8% GDP growth per year. Reduction of poverty rate by 5 percentage points by 2007. Providing gainful and high-quality employment at least to the addition to the labor

force. Reduction in gender gaps in literacy and wage rates by at least 50% by 2007. 20-point program was introduced.

Target growth:8.1% Growth achieved:7.7%

Expenditure of 43825 crores for 10th five year plans₹

Eleventh Five Year Plan (2007-2012)[edit]The overall and comprehensive picture of the growth and plan performance during the 11th Five Year Plan (2007 - 2012) and performance of various Flagship programmes being implemented in the state are presented below.

1. Economic Growth

The state economy, as measured by growth in the real Gross State Domestic Product (GSDP), on an average is expected to grow at 8.33% during the 11th Five Year Plan period (2007-12) - even surpassing the All India's GDP growth of 7.94% for the same period. Interestingly, the State economy grew faster than All-India during the 9th, 10th and 11th Five Year Plans in which the state registered average annual growth rates of 5.59% (5.52%), 8.19%(7.68%) and 8.33% (7.94%) respectively where the growth rates indicated in brackets pertain to All-India. The State had set for itself a growth target of 9.5% for the 11th Five Year Plan as against 9% for the Nation. Although there is some shortfall in the overall achievement as compared to the target both at the State level and at the National level, the growth achievement, especially of the State, during the 11th Plan could still be considered awesome, keeping in view of the fact that three years of the 11th Plan period (2008-09, 2009-10 and 2011-12) got adversely impacted either by global slowdown unfavorable seasonal conditions and floods.

2. Ensuring Equity and Social Justice

Consistent with recommendations of the Planning Commission to adhere to allocations for SCs and STs in proportion to their shares in the State population, on the average, the respective shares in the total outlays have been maintained under Scheduled Castes Sub Plan (SCSP) and Tribal Sub Plan (TSP) in the Annual Plans.

Review of performance under priority initiatives / programmes

The following is the outcome of some of the programmes /initiatives implemented during the 11th Five Year Plan. Some of the new initiatives launched during this period are also outlined hereunder.

Agricultural Resurgence

The state has been implementing a number of farmer-friendly initiatives to encourage farming in the state. These include supply of free power to Agriculture; insulate farmers from financial losses and to restore their credit eligibility in the event of crop loss through Agricultural insurance, disbursement of agricultural credit, debt waiver encouraging frame Rythu Sadassulu practices. Continuing the benefit, the Government has once again organized Rythu Chaitanya Yatras during May-June 2011 in 22 districts in the state with a holistic approach to educate the farmers at grass root level particularly small and marginal farmers Under these Yatras, 20.47 lakh farmers have been contacted and 3.37 lakh soil samples were collected and sent to Soil testing Laboratories. During June 2011, Rythu Sadassulu were organized to explain about the various schemes pertaining to Agriculture and its Allied sectors and to disseminate the Technological advances. Quality seed to farmers on 50% subsidy has been supplied. Enough quantities of fertilizers are being assured to farmers during Rabi- 2011-12. Further, adequate and timely credit support to farmers was also ensured to the possible extent. All-out efforts have been made to minimize pesticide consumption in the state through motivating the farmers through Polambadi programmes to follow Integrated Pest Management practices.

Andhra Pradesh is the first State to have promulgated an Ordinance "Andhra Pradesh Land Licensed Cultivators Ordinance 2011", which aims to provide loans and other benefits to the tenant farmers through issue of Loan Eligibility Cards. With an intention to facilitate credit to tenant farmers and ensure financial inclusion, the lists of enrolled tenant farmers who were formed into Joint Liability Groups are made available with Banks. During 2011-12, till the

end of September, an amount of 116 crore credit is extended to 34,227 non- loanee farmers ₹and an amount of 205 crore of credit was extended to 96,845 tenant farmers. Promotion of ₹SRI cultivation has been taken up in a big way by providing the necessary infrastructure on 50% subsidy in all the districts to cover an area of 3.50 lakh hectares. The State is also implementing a scheme "Bhuchetana", as an integral part of Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojana (RKVY). To encourage and support farmers the Government have recently launched a new scheme to provide interest free crop loans up to 1 lakh upon prompt repayment from Rabi, ₹2011, benefiting 95 lakh farmers. Priority is being given to develop clusters for improving productivity through good horticultural practices. The Government has formulated a State Milk Mission envisaging an outlay in excess of 6000 crore spreading over a period of next ₹five years to enhance the production.

Health Initiatives

Rajiv Arogyasri

One of objectives of the 11th Five Year Plan is to achieve good health for the people, especially the poor and underprivileged. Rajiv Aarogyasri Health Scheme is being implemented through Aarogyasri Health Care Trust in the state to assist 200 lakh poor families from catastrophic health expenditure. Since inception of the scheme (1st April,2007) till 30th September 2011, 29,021 Medical camps were held by the network hospitals in rural areas and 48.89 lakh patients were screened in these health camps. So far, 31.75 lakh patients were treated as out- patients and 13.48 lakh patients treated as in-patients in 346 network hospitals under the scheme. 11.90 lakh patients underwent surgery / therapy at pre-authorized amount of 3,319.87 Crores.₹

Emergency Transport (108) and Health Information (104) Services

Toll Free 108 Emergency Management Research Institute (EMRI) to enable rural poor easy access to hospital services, free of cost, in times of emergency. Further, a Caller-free Telephone Service (104) for the rural and urban population of the State to disseminate information, advice and guidance related to any health problem has been undertaken by the Government. Under the 108-service scheme, 5.06 lakh patients were transported during January to September 2011. Further, under 104-service scheme, 1.88 Crore calls were made under the service during 2010-11. An amount of 5891.09 crores has been spent towards ₹Medical & Public Health sector in the State during the 11th Plan.

Education

To make education more meaningful and effective, the State Government has been implementing several schemes of its own and those sponsored by the Government of India. The enrolment in the state during 2010-11 was 133.18 lakhs in all types of schools, out of which 54.64 lakhs were in Primary schools; 23.30 lakhs in Upper Primary and 53.97 lakhs were in High schools. In Higher Secondary, there was an enrolment of about 1.27 lakhs. The enrolment of children consists of about 53.49% in Primary stage (I- V), 18.96% children in upper primary (VI- VII) and 24.45% in secondary stage (VIII-X). An amount of ` 5698.80 crores has been spent towards General Education in the State during the 11th Plan.

Housing and pensions under INDIRAMMA

Under Weaker Section Housing Program, from inception through the end of March 2011, 1,00,57,318 houses have been completed: 92,42,451 in rural areas and 8,14,867 in urban areas. During the year 2011-12 (through September 2011), 2,21,972 houses have been completed, of which 2,06,492 are in rural areas and 15,480 are in urban areas. Incidentally, Housing sector is the second largest shareholder of plan budget, falling only behind the massive Irrigation sector. A total of 71,96,034 pensions are targeted to be distributed every month. During 2010-11, an amount of 1922.18 crore was distributed to 66,33,631 ₹pensioners. For the year 2011-12, an allocation of 1922.86 Crores was made in budget and ₹the Government have released an amount of 1436.02 Crores and 1343.82 Crores is ₹ ₹distributed to 68,29,962 pensioners (through November 2011).

Self Help Groups (SHGs)

The concept of Indira Kranthi Patham has been evolved with an objective of enabling all the rural poor families in 22 rural districts of Andhra Pradesh to improve their livelihoods and quality of life. All households below the poverty line, starting from the poorest of the poor are the target group of Indira Kranthi Patham At present there are 1,11,02,494 SHG members in 9,94,595 SHGs organized into 38,550 Village Organizations (VOs) and 1098 Mandal Samakhyas(MSs). Total savings & corpus of SHG members are 3383.10 crores and ₹ ₹5070.51 crores respectively. Social capital created during the project period up to September, 2011 is 1,73,841.

Social Harmony

From the year 2008-09, applications and sanction of scholarships to S.C, S.T and B.C students were made ONLINE to ensure -that scholarships reach the students by the 1 of every month and also to ensure transparency by keeping all the information in the public domain. Apart from the above, other educational and economic development programmes are also being implemented to SC, ST, BC and Minorities. An amount of 10802.47 crores has been ₹spent towards welfare of SCs, STs, BCs and Minorities in the State during the 11th plan

Urban Development

Economic growth, substantially driven by Industries and Services sector is witnessing accelerated demographic expansion of urban population, not seen during last century. The emerging challenge needs to be tackled on multiple fronts simultaneously. An amount of ₹10700.45 crores have been spent for Urban Development in the State during the 11th plan.

Industry

There are 114 Special Economic Zones (SEZs) approved by the Government of India and of these, 75 are notified and 27 SEZs have become operational. The projected direct employment generation is 8,50,022 and created employment is 97763 so far. The projected investment is 1,05,447 crores and achievement so far is 14,267.43 Crores. An amount of ₹ ₹

1504.72 crores has been spent under the Industries & Minerals sector during the 11th Plan.₹

Information Technology

Information Technology and Communi- cations continue to thrive in our State. I.T. exports worth 12,521 crores during 2005-06 have increased to 18,582 crores during 2006-07 and ₹ ₹

further to 35,022 crores during 2010-11. Similar upward surge in IT exports is expected to ₹continue during 2011- 12 also.

Curbing Left Wing Extremism- Integrated Action Plan (IAP)

With the aim of giving a fillip to development schemes in tribal and backward regions, mostly affected by Naxal violence, Government of India have originally taken up an Integrated Action Plan (IAP) in 60 selected districts across the country. In Andhra Pradesh State, the IAP programme is implemented in Khammam and Adilabad districts. However, recently, 6 more districts, namely, Srikakulam, Vizianagaram, Visakhapatnam, East Godavari, Warangal, and Karimnagar have been included under IAP. These new districts are provided with an amount of 30.00 crore each for implementing the developmental works in ₹the year 2011-12. It is aimed at quick resolution of problems concerning healthcare, drinking water, education and roads. Developmental works have been taken up in the Left-Wing Extremism (LWE) districts on a war footing.

Twelfth Plan (2012–2017)[edit]Main article: 12th Five Year Plan (Government of India)

The Twelfth Five-Year Plan of the Government of India has decided for the growth rate at 8.2% but National Development Council (NDC) on 27 Dec 2012 approved 8% growth rate for 12th five-year plan.[13]

With the deteriorating global situation, the Deputy Chairman of the Planning Commission Mr Montek Singh Ahluwalia has said that achieving an average growth rate of 9 per cent in the next five years is not possible. The Final growth target has been set at 8% by the endorsement of plan at the National Development Council meeting held in New Delhi.

"It is not possible to think of an average of 9 per cent (in 12th Plan). I think somewhere between 8 and 8.5 per cent is feasible,” Mr Ahluwalia said on the sidelines of a conference of State Planning Boards and departments. The approached paper for the 12th Plan, approved last year, talked about an annual average growth rate of 9 per cent.

“When I say feasible...that will require major effort. If you don’t do that, there is no God given right to grow at 8 per cent. I think given that the world economy deteriorated very sharply over the last year...the growth rate in the first year of the 12th Plan (2012-13) is 6.5 to 7 per cent.”

He also indicated that soon he would share his views with other members of the Commission to choose a final number (economic growth target) to put before the country’s NDC for its approval.

The government intends to reduce poverty by 10 per cent during the 12th Five-Year Plan. Mr Ahluwalia said, “We aim to reduce poverty estimates by 9 per cent annually on a sustainable basis during the Plan period.”

Earlier, addressing a conference of State Planning Boards and Planning departments, he said the rate of decline in poverty doubled during the 11th Plan. The commission had said, while

using the Tendulkar poverty line, the rate of reduction in the five years between 2004–05 and 2009–10, was about 1.5 percentage points each year, which was twice that when compared to the period between 1993-95 to 2004-05.[14]

What is Marginal Standing Facility ? / Definition of Marginal Standing Facility - RBI  (we give below details in plain language for non bankers) :- 

RBI in its Monetary Policy announced on 03rd May, 2011 that it will soon be introducing Marginal Standing Facility (MSF).  Later on RBI announced that MSF scheme has become effective from 09th May, 2011.   

Marginal Standing Facility Rate :  Under this scheme, Banks are able to borrow upto 2%  of their respective Net Demand and Time Liabilities" outstanding at the end of the second preceding fortnight .  The rate of interest on the amount accessed from this facility wef  7th October, 2013 has been fixed at 9.00% (earlier wef 20th September, 2013, it was reduced 9.50%).  This reduction has been done to meet the crunch in liquidity inthe banking sector.  This scheme is likely to reduce volatility in the overnight rates and improve monetary transmission.

National Food Security Bill, 2013From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Food security and insecurity in India

The Indian National Food Security Act, 2013 (also Right to Food Act), was signed into law September

12, 2013.[1] This law aims to provide subsidized food grains to approximately two thirds of India's 1.2 billion

people.[2] Under the provisions of the bill, beneficiaries are to be able to purchase 5 kilograms per eligible

person per month of cereals at the following prices:

rice  at  3 (4.6¢ US) per kg

wheat  at  2 (3.1¢ US) per kg

coarse grains (millet) at  1 (1.5¢ US) per kg.

Pregnant women, lactating mothers, and certain categories of children are eligible for daily free meals. The

bill was highly controversial, and despite introduction into Parliament in December 2012 was passed only in

late August 2013, after initially being promulgated as a presidential ordinance on July 5. [3][4]

Contents

  [hide] 

1   Salient features

2   Intent

3   Scope

4   Commentary

o 4.1   Critics

o 4.2   Advocates

5   See also

6   References

7   External links

o 7.1   Official Documents

o 7.2   Media Coverage and Comments

Salient features[edit]

1. 75% of rural and 50% of the urban population are entitled for three years from enactment to five kg

food grains per month at  3 (4.6¢ US),  2 (3.1¢ US),  1 (1.5¢ US) per kg for rice, wheat and

coarse grains (millet), respectively;[5]

2. The states are responsible for determining eligibility;

3. Pregnant women and lactating mothers are entitled to a nutritious "take home ration" of 600

Calories and a maternity benefit of at least Rs 6,000 for six months;

4. Children 6 months to 14 years of age are to receive free hot meals or "take home rations";

5. The central government will provide funds to states in case of short supplies of food grains;

6. The current food grain allocation of the states will be protected by the central government for at

least six months;

7. The state governments will provide a food security allowance to the beneficiaries in case of non-

supply of food grains;

8. The Public Distribution System is to be reformed;

9. The eldest woman in the household, 18 years or above, is the head of the household for the

issuance of the ration card;

10. There will be state- and district-level redress mechanisms; and

11. State Food Commissions will be formed for implementation and monitoring of the provisions of the

Act.

Intent[edit]

The intent of the National Food Security Bill is spelled out in the Lok Sabha committee report, The National

Food Security Bill, 2011, Twenty Seventh Report, which states, "Food security means availability of

sufficient foodgrains to meet the domestic demand as well as access, at the individual level, to adequate

quantities of food at affordable prices." The report adds, "The proposed legislation marks a paradigm shift

in addressing the problem of food security – from the current welfare approach to a right based approach.

About two thirds of the population will be entitled to receive subsidized foodgrains under Targeted Public

Distribution System."

Scope[edit]

The Indian Ministry of Agriculture's Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP) has referred to

the Bill as the "biggest ever experiment in the world for distributing highly subsidized food by any

government through a ‘rights based’ approach."[6] The Bill extends coverage of the Targeted Public

Distribution System, India's principal domestic food aid program, to two thirds of the population, or

approximately 820 million people. Initially, the Lok Sabha Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs

and Public Distribution estimated a "total requirement of f oodgrains, as per the Bill would be 61.55 million

[metric] tons in 2012-13."[7] The CACP calculated in May 2013, "...the requirement for average

monthly PDS offtake is calculated as 2.3 mt for wheat (27.6 mt annually) and 2.8 mt for rice (33.6 mt

annually)..." When volumes needed for the Public Distribution System and "Other Welfare Schemes" were

aggregated, the CACP estimated rice and wheat requirements to total an "annual requirement of 61.2"

million metric tons.[6] However, the final version of the Bill signed into law includes on page 18 an annex,

"Schedule IV", which estimates the total food grain allocation as 54.926 million metric tons. [8]

The Standing Committee estimated that the value of additional food subsidies (i.e., on top of the existing

Public Distribution System) "during 2012-13 works out to be...Rs.2409crores," that is, 24.09 billion rupees,

or about $446 million at the then-current exchange rate, for a total expenditure of 1.122 trillion rupees (or

between $20 and $21 billion).[7]However, the Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices (CACP)

calculated, "Currently, the economic cost of FCI for acquiring, storing and distributing foodgrains is about

40 percent more than the procurement price."[9] The Commission added,

The stated expenditure of Rs 1,20,000 crore annually in NFSB is merely the tip of the iceberg. To

support the system and the welfare schemes, additional expenditure is needed for the envisaged

administrative set up, scaling up of operations, enhancement of production, investments for

storage, movement, processing and market infrastructure etc. The existing Food Security Complex

of Procurement, Stocking and Distribution- which NFSB perpetuates- would increase the

operational expenditure of the Scheme given its creaking infrastructure, leakages & inefficient

governance.[9]

The Commission concluded that the total bill for implementation of the Bill "...may touch an

expenditure of anywhere between Rs 125,000 to 150,000 crores," i.e., 1.25 to 1.5 trillion rupees. [9]

Commentary[edit]

Critics[edit]

Criticism of the National Food Security Bill includes accusations of both political motivation and fiscal

irresponsibility.[10][11][12][13] One senior opposition politician, Murli Manohar Joshi, went so far as to

describe the bill as a measure for "vote security" (for the ruling government coalition) rather than food

security.[10] Another political figure, Mulayam Singh Yadav, declared, "It is clearly being brought for

elections...Why didn’t you bring this bill earlier when poor people were dying because of

hunger?...Every election, you bring up a measure. There is nothing for the poor." [14]

The report of the 33rd meeting of the Technical Advisory Committee on Monetary Policy stated,

"...Food prices are still elevated and the food security bill will aggravate food price inflation as it will tilt

supply towards cereals and away from other farm produce (proteins), which will raise food prices

further...Members desired that the Reserve Bank impress on the government the need to address

supply side constraints which are causing inflationary pressure, especially on the food front." [15]

[16] Dr. Surjit S. Bhalla warned, "The food security bill...if implemented honestly, will cost 3 per cent of

the GDP in its very first year."[17] The writer Vivek Kaul noted,

The government’s estimated cost of food security comes at 11.10%...of the total receipts. The

CACP’s estimated cost of food security comes at 21.5%...of the total receipts. Bhalla’s cost of food

security comes at around 28% of the total receipts...Once we express the cost of food security as

a percentage of the total estimated receipts of the government, during the current financial year,

we see how huge the cost of food security really is.[18]

The Indian Ministry of Agriculture's Commission on Agricultural Costs and Prices warned that

enactment of the Bill could be expected to "induce severe imbalance in the production of oilseeds

and pulses," and "...will create demand pressures, which will inevitably spillover to market prices

of food grains. Furthermore, the higher food subsidy burden on the budget will raise the fiscal

deficit, exacerbating macro level inflationary pressures."[9] The Commission argued further that the

Bill would restrict private initiative in agriculture, reduce competition in the marketplace due to

government domination of the grain market, shift money from investments in agriculture to

subsidies, and continue focus on cereals production when shifts in consumer demand patterns

indicate a need to focus more on protein, fruits and vegetables.[9]

Advocates[edit]

The bill was widely viewed as a "pet project" of Indian National Congress President Sonia Gandhi.[19][20] Gandhi addressed Parliament the night of the August 2013 Lok Sabha vote on the bill,

saying its passage would be a "chance to make history."[21]

Former National Advisory Council member and development economist Professor Jean Drèze,

reputedly one of the architects of the original, 2011 version of the bill, wrote, "...the Bill is a form of

investment in human capital. It will bring some security in people’s lives and make it easier for

them to meet their basic needs, protect their health, educate their children, and take

risks."[22] Professor Drèze dismissed opposition from business interests, saying, "Corporate

hostility does not tell us anything except that the Food Bill does not serve corporate interests.

Nobody is claiming that it does, nor is that the purpose of the Bill."[23]

Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food, and Public Distribution K.V. Thomas stated in an interview,

This is no mean task, a task being accomplished in the second most populated country in the

world. All the while, it has been a satisfying journey. The responsibility is not just of the Central

Government but equally of the States/[Union Territories]. I am sure together we can fulfill this

dream. The day is not far off, when India will be known the world over for this important step

towards eradication of hunger, malnutrition and resultant poverty...By providing food security to 75

percent of the rural and 50 percent of the urban population with focus on nutritional needs of

children, pregnant and lactating women, the National Food Security Bill will revolutionize food

distribution system. [3]

In a rebuttal to Dr. Surjit S. Bhalla, three economists responded, "...the food subsidy bill

should roughly double and come to around 1.35% of GDP, which is still way less than the

numbers he put out."[24]

The Election Commission of India ordered on 13 October 2013 the Chief Electoral Officers of all States and Union territories to provide for None of the Above (NOTA) option in electronic voting machines (EVMs) and ballot papers.

The None of the Above option will be provided at the bottom of the panel on the EVMs or as the last row in the ballot paper after all the candidates have been listed with their respective symbols in the same language used to list the candidates. Likewise, the contours of the NOTA panel will be identical to that given to each candidate.

In constituencies contesting more than 16 candidates in the fray, an extra EVM will be attached to the first balloting unit for the NOTA option as the EVMs currently in use can accommodate only 16 rows. The NOTA votes will be counted and indicated in the final result chart.

The Election Commission of India clarified that in the extreme case of the NOTA option polling more votes than any of the candidates in the fray, the candidate who gets the maximum number of votes will be declared the winner.

The NOTA option was made mandatory by the Supreme Court of India on 27 September 2013 and gave the direction to the Election Commission of India to provide none of the above options at the end of the list of candidates contesting an election in a constituency.