42
Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review

Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

Page 2: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

1.National Carrier2.Financial Strength3.Policy Limits4.Occurrence or Claims-

Made5.Consent to Settle Clause

Five Pillars of Quality

Page 3: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

1. National Carrier

Overview:• Freedom of movement – now have

licensure by credentials in 46 states• Relocation – Seamless transition process

when moving to another state• Claims experience in all jurisdictions• Stable pricing – not subject to sporadic

pricing fluctuations because of increase in frequency/severity in one or two states

Page 4: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• www.A.M.Best.com- unbiased rating

agency for all insurance companies: o Highest rating possible is A++

• At least 16 companies have left the dental market in the last 15 years:o Quality of defense is directly

proportional to the financial status of a company

• Specialty companies tend to be isolated from external forces

2. Financial Strength

Page 5: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Per claim / Per policy year

Industry Standard Trending Standard$1 million / $3 million $2 million / $4 million

Other Options$3 million / $5 million$4 million / $6 million$5 million / $7 million

3. Policy Limits

Page 6: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• CA dentist enrolls in program teaching

sophisticated full mouth rehabilitation• Treatment modalities seem very obvious• Dentist begins to have many implant and

cosmetic failures• Abandons the program and is unsuccessful

in completing the cases• 14 malpractice cases are filed against the

doctor in one year

3. Policy Limits – Case 1

Page 7: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Result:• The dentist has a $1M/$3M claims-made

policy• The dentist has $3M in total coverage for

the 14 cases • First three cases settle in excess of $1M:o Cases of multiple implant failureso Require additional surgical procedureso Plaintiff friendly jurisdiction (Los

Angeles) • Limits possibly exhausted – doctor may

have to pay indemnity out of own pocket

3. Policy Limits – Case 1

Page 8: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• 63 y/o disabled male presents with chief

complaint of chipped porcelain on tooth number 9, a bridge pontic, and requires replacement of mandibular posterior teeth• Patient is seen and evaluated by a dental

assistant/treatment coordinator• She recommends replacement of maxillary

bridge for a cost of $21,000

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 9: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Patient returns 1 month later - meets with dentist:o Informs patient that he has TMD and

requires treatment (appliance and TENS) - Cost of $8000

• Patient’s wife balks at treatment plan/cost - dentist embarrasses spouse into accepting:o Exaggerates need for TMD treatment:o Questions husband’s future ability to

eat

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 10: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Dentist provides Neuromuscular therapy and replaces bridge from 3 to 14 - “decay and abfractions”• Root canal therapy required on 3, 4 & 13• 7 months later – fixed bridge on 12 to 14

shears off at gumline:o Bridge removed - graft and immediate

implants placed in 12, 13 & 14

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 11: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• 1 month later- upper bridge breaks, number 4 is removed, and the bridge is recemented

• Patient seen by associate - crowns placed on 21, 22 & 23

• Dentist places crowns on 12, 13 & 14• Implant supported crowns crack the new

crowns on 21 & 22• Price Tag - $43,000

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 12: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Patient sees another dentist who removes Neuromuscular orthotic because there are no signs or symptoms of TMD • Upper right bridge fails:o Upper anterior bridge has decay noted

on all abutmentso Both are removed and replaced with an

upper removable appliance

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 13: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Patient referred to an OMFS for failing implants:o Implants removedo Extensive bone grafting of maxilla is

accomplished and additional treatments are planned for implants

• Patient institutes a malpractice action• State Board for Dentistry removes

dentists license• 13 additional cases ensue after

information is made public

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 14: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Result:• $43,000 – Total spent by patient• $46,000 - Corrective grafting and implant

placement cost• $23,000 - Maxilla restoration cost• $5,000 - Cost to restore mandibular arch• $115,000 – Estimated cost of rework • Sympathetic Jury - Patient is disabled and

has income of $1500/month • $348,000 – Cost of settlement in case 1

of 14

3. Policy Limits – Case 2

Page 15: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• New dentist buys practice from retiring

dentist• Patient of retiring dentist presents with a

potential implant infection of a mandibular overdenture supported by 4 implants• Young dentist removes the overdenture to

evaluate• During overdenture removal, the patient

coughs, and the young dentist drops the hex tool into the patient’s throat

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 16: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview Continued:• Patient is raised in the chair:• Patient swallows the tool after

unsuccessful removal• Ambulance called and patient is taken to

hospital

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 17: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 18: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• X-ray taken at ER - Implant tool in patient’s stomach

• Gastroenterologist consulted and recommends removal of the tool

• During the removal procedure, the patient’s esophagus is perforated

• A trauma surgeon is called, and he performs surgery to repair the tear

• Patient loses significant portion of voice• Patient develops swallowing problems

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 19: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Patient’s health deteriorates:o 10 months later she suffers a stroke:o Requires a feeding tube

• Surgery performed to recover patient’s voice:o 1 month later, patient suffers second

stroke:o Partial paralysis

o 6 weeks later, while the husband is mouth feeding the patient sans feeding tube, the patient aspirates a bolus of food and dies

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 20: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Result:• Husband files a malpractice lawsuit on

behalf of deceased wife• Plaintiff attorney’s expert witness

concludes that the dentist should have taken precautions to prevent the swallowing of the implant instrument

• $ 3,500,000 – Demand in wrongful death lawsuit

• $1,000,000 – Final settlement

3. Policy Limits – Case 3

Page 21: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Considerations:• Nature of practice and specialty• Location of practice:o Rural, urban, or suburban

• Scope of services provided:o Extractions, Implants, IV Sedation?

• Personal risk tolerance

3. Policy Limits - Review

Page 22: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Occurrence and Claims-Made• Most quality insurers offer both• Companies prefer the risk associated

with the claims-made policy• Insured’s are better covered with an

occurrence policy

4. Coverage Options

Page 23: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Coverage options:Occurrence or Claims-Made

4. Coverage Options

Page 24: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• Dentist performs extractions of teeth 15

& 16• Patient has a difficult post-op healing

period, which includes post-op swelling and pain

• 1 month after the event, the dentist has a disciplinary hearing regarding a substance abuse charge - License is suspended

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 25: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Dentist enters into rehab and hires a Locum Tenens (LT) dentist to cover his practice while he is gone

• The LT dentist sees the patient 2 months after the original procedure:o Diagnoses the problem as possible

sinusitis and refers patient to her PCP: o PCP prescribes a regimen of Cipro

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 26: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• 1 month later – Patient still having problems and presents to the practice with swelling in the 14 area and sees a different LT dentist who performs root planning

• 3 days later – Patient has pain and swelling, prescribed clindamycin

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 27: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• 4 days after the last appointment - Patient still in pain, LT dentist extracts tooth 14 due to a periodontal infection

• 2 days later - Patient has overt drainage, and is referred to an OMFS

• OMFS examines patient and removes tooth 13, debrides the tooth 14 area, and adds Z-pak to the clindamycin regimen

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 28: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• 4 days later - Patient discontinues medication, because they were making her nauseous

• OMFS tries to see the patient for a follow-up appointment:o Patient was feeling so poorly that she

cancelled the appointment • 13 days later – Patient presents to the ER

with a diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 29: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

• Patient’s husband is very angry - Notifies both the original dentist and the OMFS that he intends to sue them all

• The LT dentists are both notified of the potential claim

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 30: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

How does coverage type impact these Locum Tenens dentists?• The first LT dentist had intentions of

moving back to the west coast, which is why she was working as a LT

• When she contacted a west coast carrier, she was obligated to discuss the potential claim

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 31: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Coverage and Locum Tenens:• If she has a claims-made policy, this

could be a problem• If she has Occurrence coverage, no

problem at all• If she has a national carrier, again no

problem

4. Coverage Options – Case 4

Page 32: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Considerations:• Point in career • Possibility of returning for additional

training• Possibility of family leave• Possibility of career change• Possibility of changing mode of practice• Possibility of retirement

4. Coverage - Review

Page 33: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

What is consent to settle?

Your rights, duties, and obligations regarding settlement of a malpractice claim

5. Consent to Settle

Page 34: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Pure Consent:• “ We will not settle a claim without your

consent”• Some companies say they would never

settle without your consent, but pure consent is not written into their policyo Ask them to put it in writing

• Just as with a dental record…if it isn’t in writing, then it doesn’t exist

5. Consent to Settle5. Consent to Settle

Page 35: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview:• 29 y/o male patient presents to a young

dentist who is an associate in a general practice• The tooth, which had a previous root

canal treatment, was diagnosed with a fractured root - extraction recommended• Patient filled out a general informed

consent form prior to anesthetization and tooth removal

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 36: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Overview Continued:• Due to the difficult nature of the

extraction, a small piece of the mesial buccal root became separated:o Removed using rotary instruments

• A post-op X-ray was taken and the young doctor was satisfied that the entire tooth had been removed

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 37: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 38: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 39: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Post-op Complications:• The patient did not experience an unusual

amount of bleeding or discomfort• 3 days post-op, the patient experienced a

yellow brown discharge from his right nostril• He contacted the dentist, because he also

thought he was having an odor from the extraction site

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 40: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Post-op Complications Continued:• The dentist, suspecting a sinus

perforation, referred the patient to an OMFS• The OMFS instituted treatment and

repaired the sinus - the healing was unremarkable

5. Consent to Settle – Case 5

Page 41: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Considerations:• Future mobility• Future insurability• Peace of mind• State board actions• You pay for it

5. Consent to Settle – Review

Page 42: Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD

@ASDAne

t

#ASDAnet

Thank you!

Mario T Catalano DDS MAGD FACD

[email protected]

Five Pillars of Quality