Upload
rosalyn-jennings
View
220
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Five Pillars – Malpractice Insurance Claims Review
Mario T. Catalano, DDS, MAGD, FACD
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
1.National Carrier2.Financial Strength3.Policy Limits4.Occurrence or Claims-
Made5.Consent to Settle Clause
Five Pillars of Quality
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
1. National Carrier
Overview:• Freedom of movement – now have
licensure by credentials in 46 states• Relocation – Seamless transition process
when moving to another state• Claims experience in all jurisdictions• Stable pricing – not subject to sporadic
pricing fluctuations because of increase in frequency/severity in one or two states
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• www.A.M.Best.com- unbiased rating
agency for all insurance companies: o Highest rating possible is A++
• At least 16 companies have left the dental market in the last 15 years:o Quality of defense is directly
proportional to the financial status of a company
• Specialty companies tend to be isolated from external forces
2. Financial Strength
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Per claim / Per policy year
Industry Standard Trending Standard$1 million / $3 million $2 million / $4 million
Other Options$3 million / $5 million$4 million / $6 million$5 million / $7 million
3. Policy Limits
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• CA dentist enrolls in program teaching
sophisticated full mouth rehabilitation• Treatment modalities seem very obvious• Dentist begins to have many implant and
cosmetic failures• Abandons the program and is unsuccessful
in completing the cases• 14 malpractice cases are filed against the
doctor in one year
3. Policy Limits – Case 1
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Result:• The dentist has a $1M/$3M claims-made
policy• The dentist has $3M in total coverage for
the 14 cases • First three cases settle in excess of $1M:o Cases of multiple implant failureso Require additional surgical procedureso Plaintiff friendly jurisdiction (Los
Angeles) • Limits possibly exhausted – doctor may
have to pay indemnity out of own pocket
3. Policy Limits – Case 1
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• 63 y/o disabled male presents with chief
complaint of chipped porcelain on tooth number 9, a bridge pontic, and requires replacement of mandibular posterior teeth• Patient is seen and evaluated by a dental
assistant/treatment coordinator• She recommends replacement of maxillary
bridge for a cost of $21,000
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Patient returns 1 month later - meets with dentist:o Informs patient that he has TMD and
requires treatment (appliance and TENS) - Cost of $8000
• Patient’s wife balks at treatment plan/cost - dentist embarrasses spouse into accepting:o Exaggerates need for TMD treatment:o Questions husband’s future ability to
eat
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Dentist provides Neuromuscular therapy and replaces bridge from 3 to 14 - “decay and abfractions”• Root canal therapy required on 3, 4 & 13• 7 months later – fixed bridge on 12 to 14
shears off at gumline:o Bridge removed - graft and immediate
implants placed in 12, 13 & 14
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• 1 month later- upper bridge breaks, number 4 is removed, and the bridge is recemented
• Patient seen by associate - crowns placed on 21, 22 & 23
• Dentist places crowns on 12, 13 & 14• Implant supported crowns crack the new
crowns on 21 & 22• Price Tag - $43,000
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Patient sees another dentist who removes Neuromuscular orthotic because there are no signs or symptoms of TMD • Upper right bridge fails:o Upper anterior bridge has decay noted
on all abutmentso Both are removed and replaced with an
upper removable appliance
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Patient referred to an OMFS for failing implants:o Implants removedo Extensive bone grafting of maxilla is
accomplished and additional treatments are planned for implants
• Patient institutes a malpractice action• State Board for Dentistry removes
dentists license• 13 additional cases ensue after
information is made public
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Result:• $43,000 – Total spent by patient• $46,000 - Corrective grafting and implant
placement cost• $23,000 - Maxilla restoration cost• $5,000 - Cost to restore mandibular arch• $115,000 – Estimated cost of rework • Sympathetic Jury - Patient is disabled and
has income of $1500/month • $348,000 – Cost of settlement in case 1
of 14
3. Policy Limits – Case 2
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• New dentist buys practice from retiring
dentist• Patient of retiring dentist presents with a
potential implant infection of a mandibular overdenture supported by 4 implants• Young dentist removes the overdenture to
evaluate• During overdenture removal, the patient
coughs, and the young dentist drops the hex tool into the patient’s throat
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview Continued:• Patient is raised in the chair:• Patient swallows the tool after
unsuccessful removal• Ambulance called and patient is taken to
hospital
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• X-ray taken at ER - Implant tool in patient’s stomach
• Gastroenterologist consulted and recommends removal of the tool
• During the removal procedure, the patient’s esophagus is perforated
• A trauma surgeon is called, and he performs surgery to repair the tear
• Patient loses significant portion of voice• Patient develops swallowing problems
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Patient’s health deteriorates:o 10 months later she suffers a stroke:o Requires a feeding tube
• Surgery performed to recover patient’s voice:o 1 month later, patient suffers second
stroke:o Partial paralysis
o 6 weeks later, while the husband is mouth feeding the patient sans feeding tube, the patient aspirates a bolus of food and dies
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Result:• Husband files a malpractice lawsuit on
behalf of deceased wife• Plaintiff attorney’s expert witness
concludes that the dentist should have taken precautions to prevent the swallowing of the implant instrument
• $ 3,500,000 – Demand in wrongful death lawsuit
• $1,000,000 – Final settlement
3. Policy Limits – Case 3
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Considerations:• Nature of practice and specialty• Location of practice:o Rural, urban, or suburban
• Scope of services provided:o Extractions, Implants, IV Sedation?
• Personal risk tolerance
3. Policy Limits - Review
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Occurrence and Claims-Made• Most quality insurers offer both• Companies prefer the risk associated
with the claims-made policy• Insured’s are better covered with an
occurrence policy
4. Coverage Options
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Coverage options:Occurrence or Claims-Made
4. Coverage Options
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• Dentist performs extractions of teeth 15
& 16• Patient has a difficult post-op healing
period, which includes post-op swelling and pain
• 1 month after the event, the dentist has a disciplinary hearing regarding a substance abuse charge - License is suspended
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Dentist enters into rehab and hires a Locum Tenens (LT) dentist to cover his practice while he is gone
• The LT dentist sees the patient 2 months after the original procedure:o Diagnoses the problem as possible
sinusitis and refers patient to her PCP: o PCP prescribes a regimen of Cipro
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• 1 month later – Patient still having problems and presents to the practice with swelling in the 14 area and sees a different LT dentist who performs root planning
• 3 days later – Patient has pain and swelling, prescribed clindamycin
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• 4 days after the last appointment - Patient still in pain, LT dentist extracts tooth 14 due to a periodontal infection
• 2 days later - Patient has overt drainage, and is referred to an OMFS
• OMFS examines patient and removes tooth 13, debrides the tooth 14 area, and adds Z-pak to the clindamycin regimen
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• 4 days later - Patient discontinues medication, because they were making her nauseous
• OMFS tries to see the patient for a follow-up appointment:o Patient was feeling so poorly that she
cancelled the appointment • 13 days later – Patient presents to the ER
with a diagnosis of sepsis and septic shock
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
• Patient’s husband is very angry - Notifies both the original dentist and the OMFS that he intends to sue them all
• The LT dentists are both notified of the potential claim
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
How does coverage type impact these Locum Tenens dentists?• The first LT dentist had intentions of
moving back to the west coast, which is why she was working as a LT
• When she contacted a west coast carrier, she was obligated to discuss the potential claim
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Coverage and Locum Tenens:• If she has a claims-made policy, this
could be a problem• If she has Occurrence coverage, no
problem at all• If she has a national carrier, again no
problem
4. Coverage Options – Case 4
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Considerations:• Point in career • Possibility of returning for additional
training• Possibility of family leave• Possibility of career change• Possibility of changing mode of practice• Possibility of retirement
4. Coverage - Review
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
What is consent to settle?
Your rights, duties, and obligations regarding settlement of a malpractice claim
5. Consent to Settle
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Pure Consent:• “ We will not settle a claim without your
consent”• Some companies say they would never
settle without your consent, but pure consent is not written into their policyo Ask them to put it in writing
• Just as with a dental record…if it isn’t in writing, then it doesn’t exist
5. Consent to Settle5. Consent to Settle
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview:• 29 y/o male patient presents to a young
dentist who is an associate in a general practice• The tooth, which had a previous root
canal treatment, was diagnosed with a fractured root - extraction recommended• Patient filled out a general informed
consent form prior to anesthetization and tooth removal
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Overview Continued:• Due to the difficult nature of the
extraction, a small piece of the mesial buccal root became separated:o Removed using rotary instruments
• A post-op X-ray was taken and the young doctor was satisfied that the entire tooth had been removed
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Post-op Complications:• The patient did not experience an unusual
amount of bleeding or discomfort• 3 days post-op, the patient experienced a
yellow brown discharge from his right nostril• He contacted the dentist, because he also
thought he was having an odor from the extraction site
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Post-op Complications Continued:• The dentist, suspecting a sinus
perforation, referred the patient to an OMFS• The OMFS instituted treatment and
repaired the sinus - the healing was unremarkable
5. Consent to Settle – Case 5
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Considerations:• Future mobility• Future insurability• Peace of mind• State board actions• You pay for it
5. Consent to Settle – Review
@ASDAne
t
#ASDAnet
Thank you!
Mario T Catalano DDS MAGD FACD
Five Pillars of Quality