41
5 chapter THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Five generic Competitive strategies

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Five generic Competitive strategies - Strategic Management

Citation preview

Page 1: Five generic Competitive strategies

5chapter

THE FIVE

GENERIC

COMPETITIVE

STRATEGIES

Copyright © 2013 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

Page 2: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-2

LO1 Gain an understanding of how each of the five

generic competitive strategies go about building

competitive advantage and delivering superior

value to customers.

LO2 Learn the major avenues for achieving a

competitive advantage based on lower costs.

LO3 Recognize why some generic strategies work

better in certain kinds of industry and competitive

conditions than others.

Page 3: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-3

LO4 Gain command of the major avenues for

developing a competitive advantage based on

differentiating a company’s product or service

offering from the offerings of rivals.

LO5 Recognize the required conditions for delivering

superior value to customers through the use of

a hybrid of low-cost provider and differentiation

strategies.

Page 4: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-4

COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES

AND MARKET POSITIONING

Competitive Strategy

� Deals exclusively with management’s game plan for competing successfully and

securing

a competitive advantage over rivals

� Represents the firm’s specific efforts to provide superior value to customers by

offering:

� An equally good product at a lower price

� A superior product with unique features perceived

as worth paying more for

� An attractive overall mix of price, features, quality, service, and other

appealing attributes

Page 5: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-5

A competitive strategy concerns the

specifics of management’s game plan

for competing successfully and securing

a competitive advantage over rivals in

the marketplace.

Page 6: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-6

FIGURE 5.1 The Five Generic Competitive Strategies

Page 7: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-7

THE FIVE GENERIC COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES

Low-cost

providerStriving to achieve lower overall costs than rivals and appealing to a

broad spectrum of customers, usually by underpricing rivals

Broad

differentiationSeeking to differentiate the firm’s product or service from rivals’ in

ways that will appeal to a broad spectrum of buyers

Focused

low-cost

Concentrating on a narrow buyer segment (or market niche) and

outcompeting rivals by having lower costs than rivals and thus being

able to serve niche members at a lower price

Focused

differentiation

Concentrating on a narrow buyer segment (or market niche) and

outcompeting rivals by offering niche members customized attributes

that meet their tastes and requirements better than rivals’ products

Best-cost

provider

Giving customers more value for the money by satisfying buyers’

expectations on key quality/features/performance/service attributes

while beating their price expectations

Page 8: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-8

LOW-COST PROVIDER STRATEGIES

A powerful competitive approach with price-sensitive buyers when a firm’s offering:

� Has a lower cost than rivals—but not necessarily

the absolutely lowest possible cost.

� Includes features and services that buyers consider essential.

� Is viewed by consumers as offering equivalent or higher value even if priced lower

than competing products.

Page 9: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-9

A low-cost leader’s basis for competitive

advantage is lower overall costs than com-

petitors. Success in achieving a low-cost

edge over rivals comes from eliminating

and/or curbing “nonessential” activities and/or

outmanaging rivals in performing essential

activities.

Page 10: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-10

TRANSLATING A LOW-COST STRATEGY INTO

ATTRACTIVE PROFIT PERFORMANCE

Option 1Use a lower-cost edge to underprice competitors

and attract price-sensitive buyers in great enough

numbers to increase total profits

Option 2Maintain present price, be content with present

market share, and use lower-cost edge to earn

a higher profit margin on each unit sold

Page 11: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-11

THE TWO MAJOR AVENUES FOR ACHIEVING

LOW-COST LEADERSHIP

1. Perform essential value chain activities more cost-effectively

than rivals

2. Revamp the firm’s overall value chain to eliminate or bypass

some cost-producing activities

Page 12: Five generic Competitive strategies

Striving to capture all available economies of scale

Taking full advantage of experience and learning curve effects

Trying to operate facilities at full capacity

Pursuing efforts to boost sales volumes and thus spread outlays for R&D, advertising, and general administration over more units

Substituting lower-cost inputs whenever there’s little or no sacrifice in product quality or product performance

Employing advanced production technology and process design to improve overall efficiency

Using communication systems and information technology to achieve operating efficiencies

Pursuing ways to reduce workforce size and lower overall compensation costs

Using the company’s bargaining power vis-à-vis suppliers to gain concessions

Being alert to the cost advantages of outsourcing and vertical integration

COST-EFFICIENT MANAGEMENT

OF VALUE CHAIN ACTIVITIES

Page 13: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-13

REVAMPING THE VALUE CHAIN

Sell directly to

consumers and cut

out the activities and

costs of distributors

and dealers

Reduce materials

handling and shipping

costs by having

suppliers locate plants

or warehouses close to

a firm’s own facilities

Reengineering the

firm’s value chain

Streamline operations

by eliminating low

value-added or

unnecessary work

steps and activities

Sell directly to

consumers and cut

out the activities and

costs of distributors

and dealers

Reduce materials

handling and shipping

costs by having

suppliers locate plants

or warehouses close to

a firm’s own facilities

Reengineering the

firm’s value chain

Streamline operations

by eliminating low

value-added or

unnecessary work

steps and activities

Page 14: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-14

WHEN A LOW-COST STRATEGY WORKS BEST

1. Price competition among rival sellers is especially vigorous.

2. The products of rival sellers are essentially identical and are readily

available from several sellers.

3. There are few ways to achieve product differentiation that have value

to buyers.

4. Buyers incur low costs in switching their purchases from one seller to

another.

5. The majority of industry sales are made to a few, large-volume buyers.

6. Industry newcomers use introductory low prices to attract buyers and

build a customer base.

Page 15: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-15

Concepts and Connections 5.1How Walmart Managed Its Value Chain to Achieve

a Low-Cost Advantage Over Rival Supermarket Chains

Page 16: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-16

PITFALLS TO AVOID IN PURSUING

A LOW-COST PROVIDER STRATEGY

1. Overly aggressive price cutting

� Price cutting results in lower margins, no increase in sales volume, and lower

profitability

2. Reliance on easily imitated cost reductions

3. Becoming too fixated on cost reduction

� Ignoring buyer interest in additional features

� Overlooking declining buyer sensitivity to price

� Denying technological breakthroughs that will nullify cost advantages

Page 17: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-17

BROAD DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGIES

Powerful competitive approaches to use whenever buyers’ needs and

preferences

are too diverse to be fully satisfied by a standardized product or service.

� Involves incorporating differentiating features that cause buyers to prefer

one firm’s brand, product, or service over those of its rivals

� Requires not spending more to achieve differentiation than the price

premium that customers are willing to pay for all the differentiating extras

Page 18: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-18

The essence of a broad differentiation

strategy is to offer unique product or

service attributes that a wide range of

buyers find appealing and worth paying for.

Page 19: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-19

BENEFITS OF SUCCESSFUL DIFFERENTIATION

Command a

premium price

Gain buyer loyalty

to its brand

Successful execution of a

differentiation strategy

allows a firm to:

Increase its

unit sales

Command a

premium price

Gain buyer loyalty

to its brand

Successful execution of a

differentiation strategy

allows a firm to:

Increase its

unit sales

Page 20: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-20

APPROACHES TO DIFFERENTIATION

Unique taste: Red Bull, Listerine

Multiple features: Microsoft Office, Apple iPhone

Wide selection and one-stop shopping: Home Depot, Amazon.com

Superior service: Ritz-Carlton, Nordstrom

Spare parts availability: Caterpillar

Engineering design and performance: Mercedes-Benz, BMW

Luxury and prestige: Rolex, Gucci, Chanel

Product reliability: Johnson & Johnson

Quality manufacture: Michelin in tires, Honda in automobiles

Technological leadership: 3M Company

Full range of services: Charles Schwab in stock brokerage

Complete line of products: Campbell soups, Frito-Lay snack foods

Page 21: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-21

DELIVERING SUPERIOR VALUE VIA

A DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY

1. Include product attributes and user features that lower the buyer’s costs.

2. Incorporate tangible features that improve product performance.

3. Incorporate intangible features that enhance buyer satisfaction in noneconomic

ways.

Page 22: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-22

MANAGING THE VALUE CHAIN IN WAYS

THAT ENHANCE DIFFERENTIATION

Manufacturing

activities

Distribution and

shipping activities

Marketing, sales,

and customer

service activities

Activities

that Enhance

Differentiation

Supply chain

activities

Product

R&D

Production R&D

and technology-

related activities

Manufacturing

activities

Distribution and

shipping activities

Marketing, sales,

and customer

service activities

Activities

that Enhance

Differentiation

Supply chain

activities

Product

R&D

Production R&D

and technology-

related activities

Page 23: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-23

PERCEIVED VALUE AND THE IMPORTANCE

OF SIGNALING VALUE

The price premium commanded by a differentiation strategy reflects actual value

delivered and value perceived by the buyer.

Buyers seldom pay for value that is not perceived.

Important to signal value when:

� Nature of differentiation is subjective

� Buyers are making first-time purchases

� Repurchase is infrequent

� Buyers are unsophisticated

Page 24: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-24

WHEN A DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY

WORKS BEST

1. Buyer needs and uses of the product are diverse.

2. There are many ways to differentiate the product or

service that have value to buyers.

3. Few rival firms are following a similar differentiation

approach.

4. Technological change is fast-paced and competition

revolves around rapidly evolving product features.

Page 25: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-25

PITFALLS TO AVOID IN PURSUING

A DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY

Pursuing a differentiation strategy keyed to product or service

attributes that are easily and quickly copied.

Incorporating product features or attributes in which buyers see

little value or are easily copied by rivals.

Overspending on efforts to differentiate.

Over-differentiating so that product quality or service levels

exceed buyers’ needs.

Trying to charge too high a price premium.

Not opening up meaningful gaps in quality or service or

performance features over the products of rivals.

Page 26: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-26

FOCUSED (OR MARKET NICHE) STRATEGIES

Reflect a concentration on a narrow piece of the total

market defined by geographic uniqueness or special

product attributes.

Appeal to smaller and medium-sized firms that may lack

the breadth and depth of resources to tackle going

after a whole market customer base.

Page 27: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-27

A FOCUSED LOW-COST STRATEGY

A focused strategy based on low cost aims at securing a competitive

advantage by serving buyers in the target market niche at a lower cost

and a lower price than rival competitors.

Avenues to achieving cost advantage are the same as for low-cost

leadership—out-manage rivals in keeping costs low and bypassing or

reducing nonessential activities.

Page 28: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-28

Concepts and Connections 5.2Vizio’s Focused Low-Cost Strategy

Page 29: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-29

FOCUSED DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY

Keyed to offering carefully designed products or services

to appeal to the unique preferences and needs of a

narrow, well-defined group of buyers (as opposed to a

broad differentiation strategy aimed at many buyer

groups and market segments).

Page 30: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-30

Concepts and Connections 5.3

Nestlé Nespresso’s Focused Differentiation Strategy

in the Coffee Industry

Nestlé’s strategy in the gourmet coffee industry has allowed its Nespresso brand of espresso coffee to become the fastest-growing billion-dollar brand in its broad lineup of chocolates and confectionery, bottled waters, coffee, ready-to-eat cereals, frozen food, dairy products, ice cream, and baby foods. The Nespresso concept was developed in 1986 to allow consumers to create a perfect cup of espresso coffee, equal to that of a skilled barista, with the use of a proprietary line of coffeemakers designed to accommodate Nespresso’s single-serving coffee capsules.

Nespresso capsules were available in 16 different roasts and aromatic profiles and could be purchased online at Nestlé’s Nespresso Club website, in any of Nestlé’s 200 lavish Nespresso boutiques located in the world’s most exclusive shopping districts, and in select upscale retailers across the globe. Nespresso coffee machines were designed for ease-of-use while having advanced technological features that maximized the aroma of the coffee and automated the entire process even down to creating a thick and creamy froth from cold milk for cappuccinos. Nespresso coffeemakers also set standards for aesthetics with classic, sleek models, avant-garde models, and retro-modern models.

The ease-of-use of the stylish Nespresso coffeemakers and the high-quality coffee selected by Nestlé for its single-serving coffee pods allowed coffee drinkers with little experience in preparing gourmet coffees to master great-tasting lattes, cappuccinos, and espresso drinks. Nespresso was sold in more than 50 countries in 2011 and had averaged annual growth in revenues of 30 percent since 2000 to reach sales of more than $3 billion Swiss francs in 2010.

Nestlé’s focus differentiation strategy for Nespresso includes the following primary elements:

• Unsurpassed product quality and proven coffee expertise.

• Unstoppable drive for innovation and distinctive design.

• Inspirational, iconic global reputation of the brand.

• Global brand community thanks to direct customer relationships.

• Exclusive routes to market.

• Expertise in sustainable quality development.

Source: Nestlé press releases, June 9, 2009; September 21, 2009; and August 11, 2010.

Page 31: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-31

WHEN A FOCUSED LOW-COST OR FOCUSED

DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY IS VIABLE

The target market niche is big enough to be profitable and offers good growth potential.

Industry leaders have chosen not to compete in the niche—focusers can avoid battling head-to-head against the industry’s biggest and strongest competitors.

It is costly or difficult for multisegment competitors to meet the specialized needs of niche buyers and at the same time satisfy the expectations of mainstream customers.

The industry has many different niches and segments, thereby allowing a focuser to pick a niche suited to its resource strengths and capabilities.

Few, if any, rivals are attempting to specialize in the same target segment.

Page 32: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-32

THE RISKS OF A FOCUSED LOW-COST OR

FOCUSED DIFFERENTIATION STRATEGY

1. Competitors find effective ways to match a focuser’s

capabilities in serving the target niche.

2. The preferences and needs of niche members shift over

time toward the product attributes desired by the majority

of buyers.

3. The segment may become so attractive it is soon

inundated with competitors, intensifying rivalry and

splintering segment profits.

Page 33: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-33

BEST-COST PROVIDER STRATEGIES

Are a hybrid of low-cost provider and differentiation strategies that:

� Involves giving customers more value for money by satisfying buyer expectations on key

quality/features/ performance/service attributes and beating customer expectations on

price.

� Is a powerful competitive approach with value-conscious buyers looking for a good-to-

very-good product or service at an economical price.

� Creates a “best-cost” status as the low-cost provider of a product or service with upscale

attributes.

Page 34: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-34

Best-cost provider strategies are

a hybrid of low-cost provider and

differentiation strategies that aim at

satisfying buyer expectations

on key quality/features/performance/

service attributes and beating

customer expectations on price.

Page 35: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-35

Concepts and Connections 5.4

Toyota’s Best-Cost Producer Strategy for Its Lexus Line

Page 36: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-36

EMPLOYING BEST-COST STRATEGIES

Best-cost strategies are contingent on:

1. A superior value chain configuration that eliminates or minimizes activities

that do not add value

2. Unmatched efficiency in managing essential value chain activities

3. Core competencies that allow differentiating attributes to be incorporated at

a low cost

Page 37: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-37

WHEN A BEST-COST PROVIDER STRATEGY

WORKS BEST

A best-cost provider strategy works best in markets where:

� Product differentiation is the norm.

� The market is comprised of large numbers of value-conscious buyers

attracted to economically priced midrange products and services,

especially during recessionary times.

� A provider can offer either a medium-quality product at a below-average

price or a high-quality product at an average or slightly higher-than-

average price.

Page 38: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-38

THE DANGER OF AN UNSOUND

BEST-COST PROVIDER STRATEGY

Vulnerability to both low-cost providers and high-end differentiators

in not having the requisite core competencies and efficiencies in

managing value chain activities to offer significantly

differentiating product attributes or features at attractive lower

prices without significantly increasing costs.

Page 39: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-39

SUCCESSFUL COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES

ARE RESOURCE BASED

Low-Cost Providers

� Must have the resources and capabilities to keep costs below those of

competitors

� Must have expertise to cost-effectively manage value chain activities

better than rivals

Differentiators

� Must have the resources and capabilities to incorporate unique attributes

that a broad range of buyers will find appealing and worth paying for

Page 40: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-40

SUCCESSFUL COMPETITIVE STRATEGIES

ARE RESOURCE BASED (CONT’D)

Narrow Segment Focusers

� Must have the capability to do an outstanding job of satisfying the needs

and expectations of niche buyers

Best-Cost Providers

� Must have the resources and capabilities to incorporate upscale product

or service attributes at a lower cost than rivals

Page 41: Five generic Competitive strategies

5-41

PERILS OF A “STUCK IN THE MIDDLE” STRATEGY

Compromise strategies can result in middle-of-the-pack industry rankings

and, at best, average performance due to:

� An average cost structure

� Minimal product differentiation relative to rivals

� An average image and reputation

� Limited prospect of industry leadership

Compromise or middle-ground strategies rarely produce sustainable

competitive advantage