Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Five County Association of Governments
1070 West 1600 South, Building BSt. George, Utah 84770
Fax (435) 673-3540
Post Office Box 1550St. George, Utah 84771
Office (435) 673-3548
TO:
FROM:
DATE;
SOUTHWEST UTAH
**MEMORANDUM**
ALL STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERS AND INTERESTED PARTIES
COMMISSIONER JIM EARDLEY, CHAIR
MARCH 5, 2014
SUBJECT: STEERING COMMITTEE. WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014
THE NEXT MEETING OF THE STEERING COMMITTEE WILL BE HELD ONWEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014, BEGINNING AT 1:00 PM. THE MEETING WILL BEHELD AT THE BEAVER CITY OFFICE, CONFERENCE ROOM, LOCATED AT 30 WEST300 NORTH, BEAVER, UTAH.
MATERIALS ARE ATTACHED TO ASSIST YOU IN PREPARING FOR THIS MEETING.PLEASE REVIEW ALL MATERIALS AND ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNSTO THE AOG STAFF, C/O BRYAN D. THIRIOT. THIS WOULD ALLOW TIME TORESEARCH YOUR QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS PRIOR TO THE STEERINGCOMMITTEE MEETING.
WE LOOK FORWARD TO MEETING WITH YOU AT 1:00 P.M.WEDNESDAY, MARCH 12, 2014.
BDT:DL
IN BEAVER ON
ATTACHMENTS
BEAVER GARFIELD IRON KANE WASHINGTON
Five County Association of Governments
1070 West 1600 South, Building B Post Office Box 1550St. George, Utah 84770 I I St. George, Utah 84771
Fax (435) 673-3540 Office (435) 673-3548
SOUTHWEST UTAH
** AG E N D A **
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGMARCH 12, 2014
BEAVER CITY OFFICE30 WEST 300 NORTH, CONFERENCE ROOM
BEAVER, UT - 1:00 P.M.
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
I. MINUTES FEBRUARY 12, 2014 - REVIEW AND APPROVE
II. FY 2014 MID-YEAR BUDGET REVISIONS
III. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAMA. 2N0 PUBLIC HEARINGB. CONSOLIDATED PLAN PUBLIC HEARING
IV. HOMELESS POINT-IN-TIME COUNT
V. REVOLVING LOAN FUND BOARD APPOINTMENTS
VI. COMMUNITY IMPACT BOARD APPOINTMENT
VII. BIKE RACE “TOUR OF UTAH”
VII. STATE AGENCY UPDATESA. GOVERNOR’S OFFICEB. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONC. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES
VIII. SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY & DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY - UPDATES
IX. CONGRESSIONAL STAFF UPDATES
X. LOCAL AFFAIRSA. CORRESPONDENCE C. COMMUNITY IMPACT BOARD APPLICATIONSB. OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL D. OTHER BUSINESS
X. AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEWS
Notice of Special Accommodations: In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, individuals needing specialaccommodations, including auxiliary communicative aids and services, during this meeting should notify Bryan Thiriot, ExecutiveDirector, Five County Association of Governments: 1070 West 1600 South, Building B. St. George, Utah; Work # 1.435. 673.3548,extension 121; Fax # 1.435.673.3540; or e-mail [email protected] at least three working days prior to the meeting.Notice of Electronic or Telephone Participation: While board members are encouraged to attend in person, any Boardmember that is unable to attend in person may participate via a telephone conference call. To participate via telephone. Boardmembers may dial in toll tree: 1.800.444.2801 When prompted please enter session ID code: 3858200.
BEAVER GARFIELD IRON KANE WASHINGTON
MINUTES
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGFebruary 12, 2014St. George, Utah
MEMBERS IN ATTENDANCECommissioner Jim Eardley, ChairCommissioner Mike Dalton, Vice-ChairMayor Nolan DavisCarolyn WhiteCommissioner Clare RamsayMayor Jerry TaylorKen PlattCommissioner Dale BrinkerhoffMayor Dutch Deutschlander for
Mayor Connie RobinsonBecki BronsonCommissioner Jim MatsonMayor Tracy DutsonCal DurteyMike Olson for Frank Lojko
OTHERS IN ATTENDANCEWilliam SwadleyBette AnalGary WebsterJake HardmanRick TorgersonStephen LisonbeeJim MilestoneWarren BarlowBryan ThiriotGary ZabriskieScott LeavittDiane Lamoreaux
MEMBERS NOT IN ATTENDANCEMayor Robert Houston, ExcusedWendy Allan, ExcusedWes Curtis
REPRESENTINGWashington Co. Commissioner RepresentativeBeaver County Commissioner RepresentativeBeaver County Mayor RepresentativeBeaver County Schools RepresentativeGarfield County Commissioner RepresentativeGarfield County Mayor RepresentativeGarfield County Schools RepresentativeIron County Commissioner RepresentativeIron County Mayor Representative
Iron County Schools RepresentativeKane County Commissioner RepresentativeWashington County Mayor Representative
Washington County Schools RepresentativeDixie State University
Senator Hatch’s OfficeSenator Lee’s OfficeCongressman Stewart’s OfficeGovernor’s Office of Economic DevelopmentUtah Department of TransportationDepartment of Workforce ServicesZion National Park - Acting SuperintendentHildale CityFive County Association of GovernmentsFive County Association of GovernmentsFive County Association of GovernmentsFive County Association of Governments
Kane County Mayor RepresentativeKane County Schools RepresentativeSouthern Utah University
Commissioner Jim Matson led the group in the pledge of allegiance.
Commissioner Jim Matson, Chair, welcomed everyone in attendance. Those asking to be excusedinclude Mayor Robert Houston, Kane County Mayor Representative, and Ms. Wendy Allan, KaneCounty Schools Representative. Mayor Dutch Deutschlander was representing Mayor ConnieRobinson, Iron County Mayor Representative.
Page 1 of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
MINUTES JANUARY 8. 2014 - REVIEW AND APPROVE
Chairman Matson indicated that a quorum was present for conduct of business andpresented minutes of the January 8, 2014 meeting for discussion and consideration ofapproval.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER DALE BRINKERHOFF, SECONDED BY MS.CAROLYN WHITE, TO APPROVE MINUTES OF THE JANUARY 8, 2014 MEETING ASPRESENTED. MOTION CARRIED.
STEERING COMMITTEE MEMBERSHIP
A. MAYOR REPRESENTATIVES - INTRODUCTION
Mr. Bryan Thiriot introduced mayor representatives for the upcoming year asfollows: 1) Beaver County-- Mayor Nolan Davis; 2) Garfield County-- Mayor JerryTaylor; 3) Iron County-- Mayor Connie Robinson; 4) Kane County-- Mayor RobertHouston; and 5) Washington County-- Mayor Tracy Dutson.
B. SCHOOL
Mr. Bryan Thiriot provided introducti n of school board representatives for theupcoming year as follows: 1) Beaver County-- Ms. Carolyn White; 2) GarfieldCounty-- Mr. Ken Platt; 3) Iron County-- Ms. Becki Bronson; 4) Kane County-- Ms.Wendy Allan; and 5) Washington County-- Mr. Cal Durfey.
C. CHAIR AND VICE-CHAIR - WASHINGTON COUNTY
Commissioner Jim Matson outlined the rotation of the chairman to WashingtonCounty.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER JIM MATSON TO APPOINTCOMMISSIONER JIM EARDLEY TO SERVE AS CHAIRMAN ANDCOMMISSIONER MIKE DALTON TO SERVE AS VICE-CHAIR FOR THEUPCOMING YEAR. MOTION WAS SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER DALEBRINKERHOFF. MOTION CARRIED.
III. BYLAWS AND ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION
Commissioner Jim Eardley, Chair, explained that this agenda item needs to be tabled to alater date. Mr. Bryan Thiriot indicated items required by the Economic DevelopmentAdministration planning grant and the need to coordinate with EDA prior to changes in theBylaws have precipitated this action.
MOTION WAS MADE BY MAYOR DUTCH DEUTSCHLANDER, SECONDED BY MAYORNOLAN DAVIS, TO TABLE AGENDA ITEM #111, BYLAWS AND ARTICLES OFASSOCIATION. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Jim Matson clarified that the Bylaws could be changed through board action,but the Articles of Association will remain unchanged.
Page2of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
IV. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY BUILDING GRANT REVIEW
Mr. Bryan Thiriot referenced information contained in the packet on pages 23-36 includingthe scope of work for the period April 1, 2014 through March 31, 2015 for the EconomicDevelopment Administration (FDA) planning grant. Funding from FDA requires $26,143in non-federal cash match that is taken from the county contributions provided to theAssociation of Governments. Correspondence on page 23 explains the annual countycontribution and certifies that match funds are available, unencumbered and fully committedto support the continued efforts provided through this planning grant. The SteeringCommittee is required to review and approve the application, work program and budget onan annual basis. Since the packet was provided to Board members, staff at FDA hasrequested that the work plan be provided as bullet items. A handout was provided outliningthe revised Scope of Work to include the following activities: 1) Comprehensive EconomicDevelopment Strategy; 2) Local Economic Development Assistance; 3) EconomicDevelopment Professionals (EDPs); 4) Strengthen Ties to the Paiute Tribe of Utah; and 5)Foster the Emerging Role of Local Officials as Cooperating Agencies in Public LandsManagement. Commissioner Jim Matson mentioned that the 51h item needs to includecoordinating as well as cooperating agencies in public lands management. Mr. Thiriotreviewed several activities that the Six County Association have included in their FDA scopeof work as follows: 1) Work with public lands agency in the retention of multiple uses onpublic lands; 2) Sponsor and conduct an annual Leadership Summit, including an ATV rideto look at management issues on forest service lands every summer. The ATV ride isrotated to a different county each year to point out pertinent issues. Senators andCongressmen are invited to participate in the summit and ATV ride; 3) Conduct a legislativeconference and briefing on an annual basis; 4) Conduct a bi-monthly Natural ResourcesCommittee meeting; 5) Visit each county commission and city council to develop economicdevelopment needs. It would also be a good idea to meet with school districts to discusseconomic development and tying education for jobs to the economy; and 6) Provide inputregarding support or non-support for action on the Fishlake and Manti-La Sal NationalForests. Offer technical assistance to foster business on public lands. Mr. Thiriot askedif the Board would like to add these bullet items to the Five County AOG scope of work forthe FDA application.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MIKE DALTON, SECONDED BY MAYORTRACY DUTSON, TO AMEND THE BULLET POINTS TO INCLUDE THE WORDCOORDINATING AS WELL AS COOPERATING AGENCIES IN PUBLIC LANDSMANAGEMENT AND TO INCORPORATE ADDITIONAL BULLET ITEMS AS OUTLINEDFROM THE SIX COUNTY AOG WORK PROGRAM INTO THE PLANNING GRANTAPPLICATION TO THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION. MOTIONCARRIED.
V. 2014 UTAH LEGISLATURE SESSION REVIEW
Mr. Bryan Thiriot reported that this agenda item was included as a result of his attendanceat the legislative session earlier in the month. He solicited input from Board members todetermine if there are items that need to be followed and/or addressed during the session.One item of particular interest is a piece of legislation sponsored by Senator Stewart Reidthat will apply to all counties. This bill will include a rural economic map and partnership.The legislation has yet to be written but will utilize different rural economic anchors that aretied to the economy. Jake Hardman explained that the bill does not have a number and he
Page 3 of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
had not been able to obtain a copy of the language to date. His office is watching andfollowing this bill and willforward any information in this regard. He provided an explanationof the process that will be used to identify four major industries for each county that can bestrengthened as anchor businesses that drive their economies. The theory is to strengthenthese businesses and it will in turn strengthen other businesses in the county.
Commissioner Jim Matson commented on legislation of interest to counties regarding theirrole in terms of catastrophic fires and additional funding. The 2012 fire year wascatastrophic and had a big impact on counties. Legislation has been sponsored by SenatorVickers. Another piece of legislation, HB 382, deals with natural resource forest productsand livestock production. The bill has been amended to include specific areas in eachcounty zoned for this type of multiple use as priority areas for agriculture and livestock.This relates to the uses on public lands. He asked that staff at Five County become familiarwith these two bills and track what is transpiring in this regard. It was noted that it is a bigchallenge to get private land owners involved in terms of the educational process. Thereneeds to be more education provided in terms of forest fires and the impacts to privateproperty.
Ms. Carolyn White reported that there are a lot of bills dealing with funding for education.However, until the last days of the session it is hard to determine where any of the bills willbe going. A bill sponsored by Representative Don Ipson removed a lot of concernregarding what was perceived to be a loss of influence provided by school boards in termsof advanced technology centers. Ms. Becki Bronson asked about the status of HB 96regarding preschools. Ms. White indicated that this legislation seems to be picking uptraction, but it now appears that the legislation may not be in the best interest of schooldistricts.
Commissioner Jim Matson mentioned a resolution that is pending which involves fundingfor schools. In addition, Secure Rural Schools federal funding is very important to counties.This fund replaces an older mechanism referred to as the 25% fund. It was noted that PILTfunding was attached to the Farm bill and funding was approved for a one year period. Thesame battle will be necessary to continue funding for additional years.
VI. STATE AGENCY UPDATES
A. GOVERNOR’S OFFICE
Mr. Jake Hardman reported that legislation making some minor changes to theGovernors Office of Management and Budget will eliminate the Rural DevelopmentCouncil. GOED staff are watching bills that have been introduced that could haveimpacts on economic development. GOED staff are working with Utah ruralcounties on their #1 priorities. Garfield County is working on a Request forProposals for a feasibility study, part of which will be an industrial park in Panguitch.Another part of the RFP would be for a countywide economic development studyIt may be possible that assistance from Five County AOG staff will be required tofacilitate an application to EDA. There is no new information on the Southwest ATCfunding status in Iron County. The number one priority for Washington County waslegislation dealing with workforce development dealing with interaction of appliedtechnology colleges, universities, and high schools. No legislation is available atthis point. Staff has been working with a few individual companies in Kane County
Page4of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
to obtain Fast Track grant funding. Staff has also attended a couple of businessconferences as well. Beaver County has established a new Economic DevelopmentCouncil and is now working on a strategic plan. GOED staff hopes to be a resourceto mayors in the Five County region as well.
B. UTAH DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (UDOT)
Mr. Rick Torgerson, UDOT, reported that the Legislature is discussing a number ofproposals that would address funding for transportation. The local option sales taxthat would place a 3% tax on fuel has gathered a lot of attention. Other proposalswould place a smaller tax on fuel and add additional sales tax. Another topic oflegislative discussion would revise seat belt laws. UDOT reported 219 fatalities lastyear on state and local roads and more than one-half were not wearing seat belts.Odds of living through a crash are increased for those that are buckled up. Zerofatalities is a goal for the state of Utah. He reported that the Transportation Expowas held yesterday and approximately 600 people were in attendance. The annualExpo provides an opportunity for the public to interface with local entities to reviewroad projects currently under construction, as well as planning and design forprojects that will be moving forward in the future. Local projects include thefollowing: 1) Red Hills Parkway Interchange-- Construction will begin within thenext month; 2) Leeds-- UDOT has started construction on climbing lanes south ofLeeds and work on the acceleration and deceleration lanes at the South Leeds exit;3) Cedar City South Interchange-- Construction on the Diverging DiamondInterchange (DDI) will begin within the next month; 4) Beaver County-- Work willcommence this summer to replace the concrete pavement north of Beaver withasphalt; 5) Kane County-- UDOT is working on the road north of Kanab and hasworked with Kane County to schedule road closures for three hours a day in orderto remove some of the hills as well as widen the roadway. He expressedappreciation to Kane County for their assistance in minimizing impacts to the public.
Commissioner Jim Eardley reported that the Washington County Commission hasbeen meeting with the city councils throughout the county to discuss the local optionsales tax. There has been a lot of good support for the local option tax. Countiesare hoping that this legislation makes it through the legislature.
Mr. Torgerson reported that the Virgin River Gorge project is massive in nearbyArizona. UDOT has been in constant communication in order to provide informationto the traveling public. This is an extensive project that will be approximately twoyears in duration to address the bridges that have been funded. Beyond the currentwork, there will be a lot of additional work required on this stretch of freeway in thefuture. The lanes are very restricted and travelers need to add extra time to passthrough the gorge. Commissioner Eardley mentioned that Washington County hasobtained a lot of the old oil that was taken up last year in the gorge and asked whyUDOT does not offer this to counties. Mr. Torgerson explained that UDOT isrequired to get as much value from recycled asphalt as possible. It is a requirementof the Federal Highway Administration to make the material available to thecontractor. Because there was so much asphalt taken up in the gorge, thecontractor elected to give some of it to entities.
Pages of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
C. DEPARTMENT OF WORKFORCE SERVICES (DWS)
Mr. Stephen Lisonbee, DWS, provided information regarding the Utah ClusterAcceleration Program that operated very successfully in 2013. The program will becontinued in 2014 to assist private industry in meeting the market demand for askilled workforce. The program will provide funding for equipment, developcurriculum, offset some of the cost for instructor’s fees, etc. Staff has started toreach out of UCAP providers, Applied Technology colleges, and universities. Theprogram is being expanded to include secondary education as part of this processbecause some high schools carry a lot of the vocational training workload.Approximately $200,000 per application is available for expenditure during the fiscalyear. The main purpose of the program is to increase certifications 66% by 2020.An outcome of the process last year is the realization that a lot of work needs to bedone to develop pipelines for skilled workforce lower down into the elementaryschools. Through the inter-generational poverty approach, DWS has developed areplicated process for elementary schools to increase reading and math literacy.This is accomplished through the use of in-school and after-school programs.Approximately $50,000 would be available to school districts to provide equipment,teachers, etc. to implement this program. The DWS team will begin to meet withschool districts in March to introduce the program.
Mr. Lisonbee reported that the demand for labor is becoming higher than theavailability for labor. DWS has a partnership with vocational rehabilitation to worktogether to provide support to individuals with barriers to employment.
Mr. Lisonbee provided a packet containing information on the Work Successprogram, current economic snapshots for each county, program counts and otherlabor market information. Board members pointed out a typo on the unemploymentrate for the state of Utah on the Garfield County sheet and reference to BeaverCounty on the seasonally adjusted unemployment rate as well. Updatedinformation is constantly being posted on the DWS website. Mr. Lisonbee alsoreported that DWS is in the process of hiring six new eligibility specialists in the St.George office. The state of Utah is in a good position in terms of employmentopportunities and the ability to fund unemployment insurance.
VII. UNIVERSITIES
A. SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY UPDATE
No representative in attendance.
B. DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY
Mr. Mike Olson reported that Dixie State University is moving forward in search ofa new president. The final public search meeting will be held tonight. Theframework for the 85’ clock tower has been installed. This will include a clock, lightsand sound. Dedication is anticipated sometime in mid-April.
Page6of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
VIII. CONGRESSIONAL STAFF UPDATES
Mr. Gary Webster, Congressman Stewart’s Office, reported that things are very busy inWashington, D.C. and staff is tracking a lot of issues. Immigration and the debt ceiling aretopics that have generated a lot of discussion. It is important that Republicans work hardto win seats in the Senate. Legislation was passed to increase the debt ceiling that shouldbe signed today or tomorrow. Congressman Stewart focused a lot of effort in working withcounties and leaders of the Western Caucus to attach PILT to the Farm bill in theappropriations committee. Funding was approved for only one year, but the Congressmanfeels strongly that the educational process regarding the significance of PILT payments tocounties will increase support from other congressmen. Congressman Stewart is hopefulthat his position on the Appropriations Committee will provide a more solid opportunity interms of future PILT payments. Mayor Jerry Taylor commented that PILT payments wouldnot be needed if the federal government would give back the land to Utah. Mr. Websterstated that the low contribution by the federal government per acre is obviously not enough.The discussion on the table has resulted in unique conversation in Washington. A bill waspassed last week in the House that would provide more access to public lands in Utah.Commissioner Jim Eardley expressed appreciation to Congressmen Stewart for his effortsto secure PILT funds. Commissioner Jim Matson mentioned that Secure Rural Schoolsfunding is also a battle each year and continues to be a priority as well.
Mr. Bill Swadley, Senator Hatch’s Office, reported that Senator Hatch and others workedon the PILT funding issue. Senator Hatch worked hard to get at least two years of funding,but it did not work out. The Senator voted against the debt ceiling increase because of themissed opportunity to get our nation’s finances under control. He also recently introduceda legislative proposal (along with two other senators) called the Patient CARE Act. Thislegislative effort would provide an alternative to Obamacare. Senator Hatch is in theprocess of pulling together conservative ideas to fix problems associated with the healthcare system. This approach would begin with repealing the Affordable Care Act and thenputting the conservative reforms in place.
Ms. Bette Anal, Senator Lee’s Office, reported that she will be handling public land issuesas well as staffing the Senator’s southern Utah office. Senator Lee is working on a bill thatwould include PILT funding for a six year period. Mr. Ken Platt expressed his thanks toSenator Lee for his stance and thoughts regarding PILT and the Farm bill funding. Ms.Anal indicated that even though Senator Lee did not vote in favor of the Farm bill, he doesunderstand the importance of PILT funding to counties.
IX. LOCAL AFFAIRS
A. CORRESPONDENCE
Mr. Bryan Thiriot referenced several pieces of correspondence provided on pages38 through 51 mainly relating to PILT funding, including responses from SenatorHatch, Senator Lee and Congressman Stewart. He noted that all of the Utahdelegation were very responsive to correspondence provided regarding the statusof PILT funding. A clarification from Eric Clare, Washington County Attorney’sOffice, is provided on page 38 regarding open meeting law training that waspresented the at January 8, 2014 meeting.
Page7of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
B. OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL
Mr. Bryan Thiriot referenced pages 52-54 containing a request for out-of-state travelto attend the National Association of Development Organizations (NADO) policyconference to be held March 23-26, 2014 in Washington, D.C. Bryan is requestingpermission to attend the conference at minimal cost. The travel request includestravel expense for the flight only. Staying and eating with family who are in the areawill eliminate per diem expenses.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER JIM MATSON, SECONDED BY MR.KEN PLATT, TO APPROVE OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION FORBRYAN THIRIOT TO ATTEND THE NADO CONFERENCE AS PRESENTED.MOTION CARRIED.
C. COMMUNITY IMPACT BOARD APPLICATIONS
Mr. Gary Zabriskie provided background regarding the Permanent CommunityImpact Fund Board application, funding cycles and shared information in terms ofrecently funded projects in the Five County region. Information contained on pages56 through 67 provides summaries of applications submitted to the PermanentCommunity Board. Applications wre reviewed for consideration as follows: 1)Garfield County, Garfield County Memorial Hospital Nursing HomeRenovation Project-- The county has applied for a $500,000 grant, with$1 ,600,000 applicant cash pledged to the project for renovation of the GarfieldCounty Hospital Nursing Home; 2) Escalante City, Escalante Medical ClinicProject-- The city is requesting a loan in the amount of $475,000 and a grant in theamount of $475,000. Applicant has pledged $455,000 in applicant cash, in-kindcitizen donations and a federal grant from Rural Health Services. A new clinic willbe constructed that will include xray equipment and a pharmacy. The existing clinicwill be utilized to provide dental and physical therapy services; 3) Boulder Town,Town Park Restrooms Project-- The town is requesting a $84,000 grant and haspledged $5,000 cash match to construct restrooms at their park. New restroomsare available in the recently renovated Community Center which serve theplayground area. The remainder of the park is too far distant from those facilities;4) Northwestern SSD, New Fire Station in Gunlock, Utah-- The SSD isrequesting a grant in the amount of $148,035. Other funding for the projectincludes an application that has been submitted for CDBG funds in the amount of$150,000 and $20,525 in cash match from the SSD. This will provide fire protectionto an otherwise isolated area in Washington County; and 5) East Zion SSD,Wastewater Disposal System Improvements-- The SSD is requesting a $1 13,000loan and has committed $16,000 cash match to address issues at their sewerlagoons. Steering Committee representatives have the opportunity to support,remain neutral, or not support any of the applications submitted.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER CLARE RAMSAY, SECONDED BYCOMMISSIONER JIM MATSON, TO SUPPORT ALL FIVE APPLICATIONSSUBMITTED TO THE PERMANENT COMMUNITY IMPACT FUND BOARD.MOTION CARRIED.
PageS of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
Mr. Zabriskie provided a chart describing monies that go into the mineral lease fundfor allocation. Funds derived from mineral lease extraction is provided to thePermanent Community Impact Fund Board into a mineral lease account as well asa mineral bonus payment. The chart also outlines other entities that receive fundingby percentage amounts. It was noted that funds from the bonus fund must beloaned out at an interest rate. Funds from the mineral lease account can providegrants, zero percent loans, and/or a varied interest rate. Another handout includedCIB funded projects by counties FY 2009 through FY 2013 for the Five Countyregion. Mr. Zabriskie announced that CIB 101 training will be provided at the CedarCity Aquatics Center on March 27, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. Those entities who intend tomake application to CIB over the course of 2014 need to plan on attending thisapplication tutorial. Candace Powers is the new CIB Fund Manager and GayleGardner is the Associate Fund Manager. County meetings to prioritize CIB capitalimprovements lists will be scheduled in early March in each county. Jurisdictionscan contact Mr. Zabriskie to add a project to their capital improvements list.Commissioner Jim Matson mentioned that a new representative needs to beappointed to represent the Five County AOG on the Community Impact Fund Board.Mr. Zabriskie indicated that this would be included on the March SteeringCommittee agenda for Board action. Typically, Five County is asked to nominatetwo individuals with a priority nomination indicated. Applicants then makeapplication on the Governor’s website to be considered for a position on the Board.
D. OTHER BUSINESS ‘i h” .-
Mr. Scott Leavitt, CFO, announced that he will be leaving the Association ofGovernments to pursue entrepreneurial endeavors associated with his ownbusiness. The client base has expanded for their online visual yearbook to the pointthat full attention needs to be focused into the business. He expressed appreciationto the Board for the opportunity to work as the CEO for Five County and indicatedthat he would leave anytime from mid-March to March 31st This would bedependent upon recruitment and hiring of a new CEO. A new position descriptionand announcement will be necessary because of the addition of the Mutual SelfHelp program into Scott’s current duties. This includes direct supervision of twostaff members.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER JIM MATSON, SECONDED BYMAYOR JERRY TAYLOR, TO UTILIZE THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE (WILLBECOME THE FINANCE COMMITTEE UNDER THE NEW BYLAWS) AND THESAME SCREENING PROCESS THAT WAS USED TO HIRE THE EXECUTIVEDIRECTOR. MOTION CARRIED.
Mr. Bryan Thiriot indicated that he would like to advertise the position as soon aspossible. Copies of the revised job description and announcement will be providedvia e-mail to members for review. It was noted that the position should advertise fora minimum of seven days.
X. AREAWIDE CLEARINGHOUSE REVIEWS
Mr. Gary Zabriskie referenced two A-95 reviews submitted by Trust Lands Administrationand included in the packet as follows: 1) Cedar Point Well and Trough for Livestock-
Page9of 10
Steering Committee MeetingFebruary 12, 2014
Installation of solar pump into an existing well, and to install a water trough and solar panelsnear the well for livestock water in Garfield County; 2) Gravel Bench VegetationTreatment “Spike”-- Treatment of 1,050 acres of trust lands with “Spike” herbicide toreduce the canopy of sagebrush and increase forage for livestock five miles south of Hatchin Garfield County. Staff has consulted with Garfield County, who concurs with staffrecommendations for these reviews. The Cedar Point Well and Trough for Livestock hasa supportive recommendation. The Gravel Bench Vegetation Treatment has a conditionalreview based on the need for additional consultation with Garfield County to ensure that thisproject does not negatively impact the County’s Sage Grouse Management Plan.
MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER JIM MATSON, SECONDED BYCOMMISSIONER CLARE RAMSAY, TO APPROVE STAFF RECOMMENDATION OFSUPPORTIVE FOR THE 1ST REVIEW AND CONDITIONAL FOR THE SECOND REVIEW,CONTINGENT UPON ADDITIONAL CONSULTATION WITH GARFIELD COUNTY.MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Tracy Dutson introduced Mr. Jim Milestone, Interim Superintendent for Zion National Park.Mr. Milestone provided some background information regarding himself as well as the number ofvisitors at Zion National Park last year. He reported that the shuttle will begin operation on April1st and includes an additional 100 employees during the summer months. A veteran was recentlyhired as an air conditioning specialist. Zion National Park works very closely with Springdale andRockville regarding shuttle operations. This is the l5’ year that the shuttle system has operatedin the Park and it has been very successful. Visitors to the Park have increased each year and lastyear was no exception even with the government shut down of 10 days. A centennial campaignwill be rolled out in 2016. Commissioner Dale Brinkerhoff indicated that the federal governmentshut down was a learning experience for commissioners, who would not wait for 10 days to takeaction if this occurred again.
The next meeting is scheduled for Wednesday, March 12, 2014 in Beaver at the Beaver City officeat 1:00 p.m.
MOTION TO ADJOURN WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER DALE BRINKERHOFF ANDSECONDED BY MAYOR DUTCH DEUTSCHLANDER. MOTION CARRIED.
The meeting adjourned at 3:20 p.m.
Page 10 of 10
AGENDA ITEM # II.
LEGAL NOTICES
NOTICE OF BUDGET HEARING
The Five County Association of GovernmentsSteering Committeemeeting will be held onWednesday, March 12,2014 at 1:00 p.m. inthe Beaver (‘ity Office,Conference Room, located at 30 W. 300 N.,Beaver, UT. Revisionsto the Fiscal Year 2014Budget will be presened at that time andthe public is invited toattend. A copy of thebudget will he available one week prior tothe meeting from 8:00am, to 5:00 pm.. untilthe (lay of the hearing,at the St. George Adrninistrative office located at 1070 W. [600H., Building B. ScottLeavitt, Chief Financial Officerl
PUB#L9344Published
March 2, 2014The Spectrum
UPAXLP
II
FIV
EC
OU
NT
YA
SSO
CIA
TIO
NO
FG
OV
ER
NM
EN
TS
CO
NSO
LID
AT
ED
BU
DG
ET
JULY
1,20
13T
HR
OU
GH
JUN
E30
,20
14
BU
DG
ET
ED
EX
PEN
DIT
UR
ES
______
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
Sal
arie
san
dW
ages
Fri
nge
Ben
efit
s
Wea
ther
izat
ion
and
Hom
eP
roje
cts
Agi
ngC
on
trac
tsto
Cou
ntie
s
Mea
lsan
dM
eal
Sup
plie
s
Spe
cial
Con
trac
ts
Contr
acts
Pas
sT
hrou
gh
Oper
atin
gE
xpen
ses
Equ
ipm
ent
and
Too
ls
TO
TA
L
BU
DG
ET
ED
RE
VE
NU
ES
Fed
eral
Con
trac
ts
Sta
teC
on
trac
ts
Oth
erC
on
trac
ts
Loc
alP
arti
cipa
tion
Pro
ject
Inco
me
and
Don
atio
ns
Indi
rect
Rev
enue
InK
ind
Con
trib
utio
ns
Car
ryO
ver
Tra
vel
I. rj
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
RE
VIS
ION
RE
VIS
ION
BU
DG
ET
1,85
0,49
587
,594
--
1,93
8,08
9
1,08
6,86
841
,879
--
1,12
8,74
7
231,
358
10,9
50-
-24
2,30
8
370,
884
(29,
000)
--
341,
884
348,
622
31,4
80-
-38
0,10
2
1,11
1,06
454
,072
--
1,16
5,13
6
1,14
3,76
812
8,41
1-
-1,
272,
179
685,
200
102,
371
--
787,
571
787,
040
35,9
27-
-82
2,96
8
74,5
1964
,100
138,
619
7,6
89
,81
852
7,78
48,2
17,6
02
I.68
6,11
9-
--
686,
119
5,52
2,00
032
0,46
5-
-5,
842,
465
431,
801
56,9
00-
-48
8,70
1
223,
672
(2,5
00)
--
221,
172
48
4,3
00
33,0
00-
-51
7,30
032
0,17
0-
--
320,
170
21,7
5611
9,91
9-
-14
1,67
5
7,6
89
,81
852
7,78
4-
-8,2
17,6
02
TO
TA
L
FY20
13:
$8,6
42,4
69
AD
MIN
ISTR
ATI
ON
FY
2014
511-
01
513-
01
516-
01
520-
01
521-
01
522-
01
523-
01
524-
01
525-
01
530-
01
533-
01
540-
01
544-
01
545-
01
546-
01
547-
01
548-
01
555-
01
650-
01
403-
01
404-
01
407-
01
Exe
cuti
veD
irec
tor
50%
FTE
Acc
ount
ing
Tec
hnic
ian
1.8
FTE
Sec
reta
ry30
%FT
E
FICA
Mat
ch
Sta
teR
etir
emen
t
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e
Work
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
Unem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
401-
K
Tra
vel
Rec
ogni
tion
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s
Pos
tage
Pri
ntin
g
Ren
t
Tel
ephone
Fisc
alM
anag
emen
t
Insu
ranc
e
Equ
ipm
ent
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
Loc
alP
arti
cipa
tion
Pro
ject
Inco
me
Indi
rect
Cos
tA
lloc
atio
n12
%T
otal
Rev
enue
APP
RO
VE
D
BU
DG
ET
40,1
50
111,
626
11,2
13
12,4
69
25,8
22
37,8
36
3,38
7
1,04
3
1,49
8
14,0
00
2,00
0
4,00
0
4,00
0
6,00
0
19,4
00
2,40
0
19,0
00
38,6
11
3,00
0
357,
455
MID
-YE
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
40,1
50
111,
626
11,2
13
12,4
69
25,8
22
37,8
36
3,38
7
1,04
3
1,49
8
14,0
00
2,00
0
4,00
0
4,00
0
6,00
0
19,4
00
2,40
0
19,0
00
38,6
11
3,00
0
357,
455
I.
37,2
8537
,285
320,
170
320,
170
357,
455
--
-35
7,45
5
FY
2013
:$3
50,3
52
AG
ING
WA
IVE
RA
DM
INIS
TR
AT
ION
FY
2014
512-
02D
irec
tor
514-
02C
ase
Man
ager
s
516-
02S
ecre
tary
517-
02N
urse
s
520-
02FI
CAM
atch
521-
02S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
02H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
02W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
02un
emp
loy
men
tIn
sura
nce
525-
0240
1-K
530-
02T
rave
l
540-
02O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
544-
02P
osta
ge
545-
02P
rint
ing
546-
02R
ent
547-
02T
elep
hone
549-
02C
ontr
acto
rC
osts
580-
02In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
02E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
02S
tate
Contr
act
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T18
,186
18,1
86
4,92
9
6,57
0
13,5
00
2,27
1
5,02
0
5,26
0
655
240 24
5,00
0
1,20
0
450
1,20
0
945
650
600
6,80
0
2,50
076
,000
24
5,00
0
1,20
0
450
1,20
0
945
650
600
6,80
0
2,50
0
76,0
00
76,0
0076
,000
76,0
00-
--
76,0
00
4,92
9
6,57
0
13,5
00
2,27
1
5,02
0
5,26
0
655
240
0 -4. m S
FY20
13:
$76,
000
HO
ME
PRO
GR
AM
FY20
14
514-
03C
oord
inat
or52
0-03
FICA
Mat
ch
521-
03S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
03H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
03W
orkm
an’s
Com
p52
4-03
Une
mpl
oym
ent
Insu
ranc
e52
5-03
401-
K
530-
03T
rave
l
540-
03O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
542-
03H
ome
Pro
ject
s54
4-03
Pos
tage
545-
03P
rint
ing
547-
03T
elep
hone
580-
03In
dire
ctC
osts
Dep
artm
ent
Tota
l(3
1
402-
03S
tate
Con
trac
ts-
DC
ED
-H
OM
E
Tota
lR
even
ue
AP
PR
OV
ED
MID
-YE
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
6,01
16,
011
1,13
81,
138
87,6
80-
--
87,6
80
87,6
8087
,680
87,6
80-
--
87,6
80
460
1,03
9
1,80
2
133 39
1,35
9
200
75,0
00 123
226
150
460
1,03
9
1,80
2
133 39
1,35
9
200
75,0
00 123
226
150
0
FY20
13:
$99,
184
CO
MM
UN
IT
YA
ND
EC
ON
OM
IC
DE
VE
LO
PM
EN
T
FY
20
14
APP
RO
VE
D
BU
DG
ET
______
511
Exe
cuti
veD
irec
tor
25,5
50
514
Pla
nner
s16
1,36
7
520
FIC
AM
atch
14,2
09
521
Sta
teR
etir
emen
t32
,126
522
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e40
,871
523
Wor
ker’
sC
om
pen
sati
on
4,13
152
4U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e1,
217
1,21
752
540
1-1<
1,39
61,
396
530
Tra
vel
17,3
1917
,319
540
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s3,
207
3,20
754
4P
osta
ge1,
870
1,87
0
545
Pri
ntin
g4,
650
4,65
054
6R
ent
2,32
92,
329
547
Tel
eph
on
e2,
159
2,15
954
9C
on
trac
tor
Cos
ts-
3,27
755
1RL
FC
losi
ngC
osts
6,00
06,
000
557
Sof
twar
eL
icen
sing
1,20
01,
200
580
Indi
rect
Cos
ts33
,715
33,7
1565
0E
quip
men
t1,
555
1,55
5D
epar
tmen
tT
otal
354,
961
358,
238
402
Sta
teC
ontr
acts
403
Loc
alP
arti
cipa
tion
404
Pro
ject
Inco
me
405
Car
ryO
ver
406
CD
BG
Sta
teC
ontr
act
40
8F
ed
eral
Contracts
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
_____________________________
Tot
alR
even
ue
MID
-YEA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
25,5
50
161,
367
14,2
99
32,1
26
40,8
71
4,13
1
3,27
7
3,27
7-
-
120,
000
120,
000
44,4
8244
,482
45,5
7945
,579
-3,
277
3,27
790
,000
90,0
0054
,900
54,9
0035
4,96
13,
277
--
358,
238
FY
2013
:$4
54,9
44
AG
ING
WA
IVE
RSE
RV
ICE
S
FY20
14
514-
04C
ase
Man
ager
s
520-
04FI
CAM
atch
521-
04S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
04H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
04W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
04U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e52
5-04
401-
K
530-
04T
rave
l
540-
04O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
544-
04P
osta
ge
545-
04P
rint
ing
546-
04R
ent
547-
04T
elep
hone
580-
04In
dire
ctC
osts
iS
650-
04E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
49,4
0749
,407
3,78
03,
780
7,37
77,
377
12,1
5612
,156
1,09
01,
090
478
478
219
219
3,50
03,
500
550
550
352
352
750
750
1,50
01,
500
92,6
0092
,600
92,6
00-
--
92,6
00
* 0
420-
04H
CF
-C
ase
Man
agem
ent
Tot
alR
even
ue
1,30
0
8,94
1
1,20
0
92,6
00
1,30
0
8,94
1
1,20
0
92,6
00
FY
2013
:$1
00,0
00
SPEC
IAL
CO
NT
RA
CT
SFY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T8
02
-06
Alt
ernat
ives
331,5
23
33
1,5
23
803-0
6O
mbudsm
anP
rogr
am23,3
77
23
,37
7804-0
6C
AP
Uta
h4,9
37
4,9
37
805-0
6A
OG
Off
ice
Bui
ldin
g36,0
00
36
,00
08
06
-06
SSB
G70
,777
70
,77
7807-0
6C
hron
icD
isea
seG
rant
48,4
00
48
,40
0808-0
6T
EFA
P30,0
00
5,0
00
35
,00
0809-0
6C
areg
iver
Support
Pro
gram
143,4
92
21,5
1116
5,00
3810-0
6W
aive
rM
isce
llan
eous
135,0
00
13
5,0
00
0811-0
6V
ITA
Pro
gram
27
,00
02
7,0
00
81
3-0
6S
enio
rM
edic
are
Pat
rol
50,4
1213,0
00
63,4
12
815-0
6H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
Cou
nsel
ing
(SH
IIP)
58,9
5516,9
00
75
,85
58
16
-06
Em
erge
ncy
Foo
dan
dS
hel
ter
47,8
95
47
,89
58
22
-06
Em
erge
ncy
Foo
dN
etw
ork
38,0
00
38
,00
08
28
-06
Pan
try
Exp
ense
s-
58
,00
05
8,0
00
830-0
6R
etir
emen
tIn
sura
nce
38,0
00
38
,00
0832-0
6W
elco
me
Cen
ter
60,0
00
60
,00
0839-0
6O
pti
ons
Cou
nsel
ing
Exp
ense
-14
,000
14
,00
0D
epar
tmen
tT
otal
1,1
43,7
68
128,
411
--
1,2
72
,17
9
404-0
6P
roje
ctIn
com
e71,6
00
71
,60
0
422-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-A
lter
nat
ives
331,5
23
33
1,5
23
423-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-O
mbudsm
an23,3
77
23
,37
7
424-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-C
AP
Uta
h4,
937
4,9
37
425-0
6M
edic
aid
-W
aive
rM
isc.
135,0
00
13
5,0
00
426-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-SS
BG
70,7
77
70
,77
7
427-0
6E
duca
tion
-T
EFA
P30
,000
5,0
00
35
,00
0428-0
6P
antr
y-
58
,00
05
8,0
00
429-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-C
areg
iver
Support
143,
492
21,5
111
65
,00
3
431-0
6V
ITA
Pro
gram
Rev
enue
27,0
00
27
,00
0
433-0
6S
enio
rM
edic
are
Pat
rol
Rev
enue
50,4
1213
,000
63
,41
2434-0
6SH
IIP
Rev
enue
58,9
55
16,9
0075
,855
436-0
6E
mer
genc
yF
ood
and
Sh
elte
rR
even
ue47,8
95
47
,89
5
437-0
6C
hron
icD
isea
seG
rant
Rev
enue
48,4
00
48
,40
0
439-0
6O
pti
ons
Cou
nsel
ing
Rev
enue
-14,0
00
14,0
00
445-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-EF
N38,0
00
38
,00
0452-0
6S
tate
Contr
act
-U
TC60,0
00
60
,00
0
453-0
6R
etir
emen
tIn
sE
mp
Par
tici
pat
ion
2,4
00
2,40
0T
ota
lR
even
ue
1,1
43,7
68
128,
411
--
1,2
72
,17
9
FY20
13:
$1,0
66,7
98
AR
EA
AG
EN
CY
ON
AG
ING
FY2014
512-
07D
irec
tor
35%
515-
07A
ccou
ntin
gT
ech
25%
516-
07S
ecre
tary
(PT)
520-
07FI
CAM
atch
521-
07S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
07H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
07W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
07U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
525-
0740
1-K
530-
07T
rave
l
540-
07O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
544-
07P
osta
ge
545-
07P
rint
ing
546-
07R
ent
547-
07T
elep
hone
552-
07C
ount
yC
ounc
ils
onA
ging
580-
07In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
07E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
07D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
50,3
0050
,300
10,2
5010
,250
1,25
01,
250
4,72
04,
720
10,4
6210
,462
12,7
4012
,740
1,37
21,
372
406
406
7,00
07,
000
2,00
02,
000
600
600
800
800
1,50
01,
500
31,4
80-
-
466,
122
31,4
8049
7,60
246
6,12
231
,480
--
497,
602
0 CD S
1,00
0
348,
622
11,0
00
2,10
0
466,
122
31,4
801,
000
380,
102
11,0
00
2,10
0
497,
602
FY20
13:
$468
,024
WE
AT
HE
RIZ
AT
ION
FY20
14
512-
08C
oord
inat
or
516-
08S
ecre
tary
42,8
8842
,888
517-
08W
eath
eriz
atio
nC
rew
212,
172
212,
172
520-
08FI
CAM
atch
23,8
1523
,815
521-
08S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
53,8
2453
,824
522-
08H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
133,
961
133,
961
523-
08W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
6,88
06,
880
524-
08unem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e3,
152
3,15
252
5-08
401-
K
530-
08T
rave
l28
,455
4,00
032
,455
540-
08O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
11,7
3111
,731
544-
08P
osta
ge88
988
954
5-08
Pri
ntin
g1,
185
1,18
554
6-08
Ren
t17
,000
17,0
0034
,000
547-
08T
elep
hone
4,93
54,
935
549-
08C
ontr
acto
rC
osts
2,96
22,
962
553-
08M
ater
ials
-D
OE
50,0
0050
,000
554-
08H
ealt
han
dS
afet
y21
,000
21,0
0055
5-08
Insu
ranc
e1,
481
1,48
155
8-08
Mat
eria
ls-
LIH
EAP
100,
000
78,3
6655
9-08
O.u
esta
r24
,884
17,5
1856
3-08
LIH
EAP
Ene
rgy
Cri
sis
100,
000
100,
000
580-
08In
dire
ctC
osts
34,1
8434
,184
650-
08E
quip
men
t2,
061
10,0
616
51
-0
8T
ools
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
________________
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
08S
tate
Con
trac
ts
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__________________
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID4E
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
56,2
4456
,244
C) 0
(21,
634)
(7,3
66)
8,00
0
25,9
2525
,925
959,
628
--
-95
9,62
8
959,
628
959,
628
959,
628
--
-95
9,62
8
FY
2013
:$9
18,6
11
RE
TIR
ED
SEN
IOR
VO
I.U
NT
EE
RPR
OG
RA
M
FY2
01
4
512-
09D
irec
tor
514-
09C
oord
inat
ors
516-
09S
ecre
tary
520-
09FI
CAM
atch
521-
09S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
09H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
09W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
09U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
530-
09T
rave
l2,
500
531-
09V
olu
nte
erT
rave
l
533-
09R
ecog
niti
on
540-
09O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
541-
09B
ackg
roun
dC
heck
s
—‘
542-
09C
ontr
actu
alS
ervi
ces
544-
09P
osta
ge
545-
09P
rint
ing
546-
09R
ent
-1,
000
1,00
014
9,23
7-
--
149,
237
5,50
05,
500
6,40
06,
400
137,
337
137,
337
149,
237
--
-14
9,23
7
525-
0940
1-K
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
12,9
8612
,986
35,7
9935
,799
3,73
23,
732
6,48
56,
485
26,6
6926
,669
1,07
81,
078
536
536
1,52
31,
523
2,50
0
27,0
00
2,52
6
1,50
0
1,75
5
(500
)-
2,07
0
920
6,58
6
1,31
5
2,60
0
(500
)-
10,6
57
* I27
,000
2,52
6
1,50
0
1,75
5
500
2,07
0
920
6,58
6
1,31
5
2,60
0
500
10,6
57
547-
09T
elep
hone
555-
09In
sura
nce
557-
09S
oftw
are
Lic
ensi
ng
580-
09In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
09E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
09D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
404-
09P
roje
ctIn
com
e
405-
09C
arry
Ove
r
406-
09O
ther
Con
trac
ts(C
liffo
rdG
rant
)40
8-09
RSV
PF
eder
alC
ontr
act
Tot
alR
even
ue
FY
2013
:$1
54,6
66
VO
LU
NT
EE
RC
EN
TE
R-
IRO
NC
OU
NT
Y
FY20
14
512-
11D
irec
tor
514-
11C
oord
inat
or
520-
11R
CA
Mat
ch
521-
11S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
11H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
11W
ork
ers
Com
pens
atio
n
524-
11U
nem
ploy
men
tIn
sura
nce
525-
1140
1-K
530-
11T
rave
l
540-
11O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
542-
11C
ontr
actu
alS
ervi
ces
544-
11P
osta
ge
545-
11P
rint
ing
546-
11R
ent
547-
11T
elep
hone
580-
11In
dire
ctC
osts
Dep
artm
ent
Tota
l
403-
11L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on40
4-11
Pro
ject
Inco
me
406-
11D
onat
ions
Tota
lR
even
ue
AP
PR
OV
ED
MID
-YE
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
481
481
4,63
81,
600
6,23
8
392
100
492
595
100
695
3,42
450
03,
924
113
5016
3
6330
93
211
5026
1
800
800
740
740
2,30
02,
720
5,02
0
411
411
600
600
1,00
01,
000
500
500
1,13
235
01,
482
17,4
005,
500
22,9
00
11,5
00(2
,500
)9,
000
400
8,00
08,
400
5,50
0
17,4
005,
500
--
22,9
00
C)
0
FY20
13:
$17,
500
CH
ILD
CA
RE
RES
OU
RC
E&
REF
ERR
AL
FY20
14
512-
13D
irec
tor
514-
13P
rogr
amS
taff
139,
800
517-
13C
ontr
act
Tra
iner
san
dM
ento
rS
tipe
nds
21,0
00
520-
13FI
CAM
atch
16,4
27
521-
13S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
37,1
2937
,129
522-
13H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
85,0
0085
,000
523-
13W
orke
r’s
Com
pen
sati
on
4,74
64,
746
524-
13U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e1,
960
1,96
0
525-
1340
1-K
937
93
530-
13T
rave
l14
,343
14,3
4353
2-13
Sta
rt-U
pG
rant
s10
,000
10,0
00
540-
13O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
4,80
04,
800
541-
13M
arke
ting
/Adv
erti
sing
1,50
01,
500
542-
13T
rain
ing
Mat
eria
ls15
,595
15,5
95
c--’
543-
13C
omm
unit
yO
utr
each
500
500
544-
13P
ost
age
4,50
04,
500
545-
13P
rint
ing
8,90
08,
900
546-
13R
ent
20,6
5720
,657
547-
13T
elep
hone
8,47
98,
479
550-
13D
ues
&S
ubsc
ript
ions
1,00
01,
000
551-
13C
olla
bora
tion
Con
fere
nce
7,20
07,
200
580-
13In
dire
ctC
osts
43,3
1343
,313
650-
13E
quip
men
t2,
700
2,70
065
1-13
Pur
chas
edS
ervi
ces
2,00
02,
000
680-
13S
peci
alP
roje
cts
5,60
75,
607
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al53
3,03
353
3,03
3
402-
13D
WS
Sta
teC
ontr
act
403-
13P
roje
ctIn
com
e
404-
13S
peci
alP
roje
ctF
unds
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
74,9
4074
,940
139,
800
21,0
00
16,4
27
S
528,
033
528,
033
5,00
05,
000
533,
033
--
-53
3,03
3
FY
2013
:$5
33,0
33
NU
TR
ITIO
N
FY20
14
512-
14D
irec
tor
8,60
251
6-14
Dat
aE
ntry
Tec
h1,
510
520-
14FI
CAM
atch
774
521-
14S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
1,67
752
2-14
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e2,
177
523-
14W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
223
524-
14U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e65
525-
1440
1-K
-
530-
14T
rave
l1,
200
540-
14O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
200
200
541-
14K
itch
enS
uppl
ies
75,0
0075
,000
542-
14M
eals
1,03
6,06
454
,072
1,09
0,13
654
4-14
Pos
tage
200
200
545-
14P
rint
ing
200
200
546-
14R
ent
1,30
01,
300
547-
14T
elep
hone
800
800
556-
14N
utri
tion
ist
10,0
0010
,000
580-
14In
dire
ctC
osts
1,85
01,
850
650-
14E
quip
men
t5,
000
55,0
00D
epart
ment
To
tal
1,1
46
84
21,
250,
914
402-
14D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
404-
14P
roje
ctIn
com
e
405-
14C
arry
Ove
r
Tota
lR
even
ue
AP
PR
OV
ED
MID
-YE
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
8,6
02
1,51
0
774
1,67
7
2,17
7
223 65
1,20
0
C) I
50,0
00
104,
072
836,
842
836,
842
310,
000
310,
000
-10
4,07
210
4,07
21,
146,
842
104,
072
--
1,25
0,91
4
FY20
13:
$1,2
41,6
49
HE
AT
ASS
IST
AN
CE
PRO
GR
AM
FY2014
514-
15H
EAT
Pro
gram
Sup
ervi
sor
517-
15H
EAT
Pro
gram
Sta
ff
520-
15FI
CAM
atch
521-
15S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
15H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
15W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
15U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
525-
1540
1-K
530-
15T
rave
l
540-
15O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
542-
15C
onfe
rence
s/W
ork
shops/
Tra
inin
g/S
ym
po
siu
m
544-
15P
osta
ge
545-
15P
rint
ing
546-
15R
ent
(ii
547-
15T
elep
hone
553-
15C
risi
sF
unds
556-
15E
nerg
yC
onse
rvat
ion
Mat
eria
ls
580-
15In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
15E
quip
men
t
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
42,6
24
159,
489
15,5
18
20,2
79
60,1
19
4,14
0
2,46
9
429
8,01
6
11,2
49
5,00
0
10,5
00
2,50
0
32,0
00
10,4
02
20,7
09
36,6
08
21,7
3821
,738
463,
789
--
-46
3,78
9
463,
789
463,
789
463,
789
--
-46
3,78
9
42,6
24
159,
489
15,5
18
20,2
79
60,1
190’
4,14
0
2,46
9
429
8,01
6‘S
11,2
49
5,00
0
10,5
00
2,50
0
32,0
00
10,4
02
20,7
09
36,6
08
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
15S
tate
Con
trac
t
Tot
alR
even
ue
FY20
13:
$465
,835
MO
BIL
ITY
MA
NA
GE
ME
NT
FY2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T51
2-18
Pla
nnin
gM
anag
er3,
502
3,50
251
4-18
Pla
nner
21,0
6721
,067
517-
18P
rogr
amS
peci
alis
t94
994
952
0-18
FICA
Mat
ch1,
880
1,88
052
1-18
Sta
teR
etir
emen
t2,
848
2,84
852
2-18
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e9,
010
9,01
052
3-18
Wor
ker’
sC
om
pen
sati
on
543
543
524-
18U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e19
719
752
5-18
401-
K22
622
653
0-18
Tra
vel
2,42
52,
425
540-
18O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
350
350
544-
18P
osta
ge20
020
054
5-18
Pri
ntin
g30
030
054
7-18
Tel
ephone
350
350
580-
18In
dire
ctC
osts
4,82
74,
827
650-
18E
quip
men
t25
025
0D
epar
tmen
tT
otal
48,9
24-
--
48,9
24
402-
18U
DO
TC
ontr
act
39,1
3939
,139
403-
18L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on9,
785
9,78
5T
otal
Rev
enue
48,9
24-
--
48,9
24
FY
2013
:$4
2,70
0
VO
LUN
TEER
CEN
TER
-W
ASH
ING
TO
NC
OU
NTY
FY20
14
512-
19D
irec
tor
514-
19C
oord
inat
or
520-
19FI
CAM
atch
521-
19S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
19H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
19W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
19U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
525-
1940
1-1<
530-
19T
rave
l
533-
19R
ecog
niti
on
540-
19O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
541-
19R
enta
lA
ssis
tanc
e
542-
19C
ontr
actu
alS
ervi
ces
544-
19P
ost
age
545-
19P
rint
ing
546-
19R
ent
547-
19T
elep
hone
580-
19In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
19E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
403-
19L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on
404-
19O
ther
Con
trac
ts
405-
19C
ourt
Ord
ered
406-
19D
onat
ions
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
3,36
75,
200
8,56
7
9,07
4
952
400
2,15
11,
000
6,12
73,
000
275
200
134
100
1,50
0
1,50
0
1,00
0
-15
,000
6,00
02,
900
1,00
02,
000
1,00
02,
000
3,00
0
500
2,65
0
191
40,4
21
9,12
7
475
234
1,50
0
1,50
0
1,00
0
15,0
00
8,90
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
3,00
0
500
3,85
0
191
73,4
2133
,000
--
15,0
0015
,000
-8,
000
8,00
0
700
700
24,7
2125
,000
49,7
21
40,4
2133
,000
--
73,4
21
C)
9,07
4
1,35
2
3,15
1
1,20
0
FY20
13:
$41,
683
FO
ST
ER
GR
AN
DP
AR
EN
TP
RO
GR
AM
FY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
512-
20D
irec
tor
4,81
0
514-
20C
oord
inat
ors
12,6
00
516-
20A
ccou
ntin
gT
ech
1,09
5
520-
20FI
CA
Mat
ch1,
416
521-
20S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
2,74
02,
740
522-
20H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
8,28
98,
289
523-
20W
orke
r’s
Com
pen
sati
on
406
406
524-
20U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
rance
193
193
525-
2040
1-K
392
392
530-
20T
rave
l2,
000
2,00
053
3-20
Rec
ogni
tion
1,00
01,
000
535-
20V
olu
nte
erT
rave
l12
,223
12,2
2353
6-20
Phy
sica
ls45
045
054
0-20
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s1,
500
1,50
054
1-20
Bac
kgro
und
Che
cks
1,30
01,
300
542-
20FG
PM
eals
2,62
52,
625
543-
20FG
PS
tipe
nds
58,1
0758
,107
544-
20P
ost
age
720
720
545-
20P
rint
ing
756
756
546-
20R
ent
525
547-
20T
elep
ho
ne
1,40
055
5-20
Volu
nte
erIn
sura
nce
122
580-
20In
dire
ctC
osts
3,83
36
50
-2
0E
quipm
ent
______________________________________________________________________
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
20D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
405-
20C
arry
Ove
r
406-2
0O
ther
Con
trac
ts
408-20
Federal
Contract
______________________________________________________________________
Tot
alR
even
ue
4,81
0
12,6
00
C)
1,09
5
1,41
6
152
5
1,40
0
122
3,83
3
118,
502
--
-11
8,50
2
5,50
05,
500
26,2
2626
,226
86,7
7686
,776
118,
502
--
-11
8,50
2
FY20
13:
$124,8
20
UT
RU
RA
LF
OS
TE
RG
RA
ND
PA
RE
NT
PR
OG
RA
M
FY
20
14
512-
21D
irec
tor
4,32
951
4-21
Coord
inat
ors
28,3
2651
6-21
Acc
ount
ing
Tec
h1,
460
520-
21FI
CA
Mat
ch2,
610
521-
21S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
5,09
552
2-21
Hea
lth
Insu
rance
21,6
2452
3-21
Work
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
749
524-
21U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e41
252
5-21
401-
K38
753
0-21
Tra
vel
9,90
09,
900
533-
21R
ecog
niti
on3,
400
3,40
0
535-
21V
olu
nte
erT
rave
l13
,900
13,9
0053
6-21
Phy
sica
ls2,
117
2,11
754
0-21
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s2,
500
2,50
054
1-21
Bac
kgro
und
Che
cks
2,23
02,
230
542-
21FG
PM
eals
12,2
5012
,250
543-
21FG
PS
tipen
ds
88,5
4488
,544
544-
21P
ost
age
700
700
545-
21P
rint
ing
700
700
546-
21R
ent
1,54
81,
548
547-
21T
elep
ho
ne
1,50
01,
500
549-
21C
ontr
acte
dS
ervi
ces
2,00
02,
000
555-
21V
olu
nte
erIn
sura
nce
242
242
580-
21In
dire
ctC
osts
7,79
97,
799
65
0-2
1E
quip
ment
______________________________________________________________________
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-2
1D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
403-
21L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on
406-2
1O
ther
Contr
acts
408-2
1F
eder
alC
ontr
act
444-21
In
Kin
dC
ontributions
______________________________________________________________________
To
tal
Rev
enu
e
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
4,32
9
28,3
26
1,46
0
2,61
0
5,09
5
21,6
24 749
412
387
C)
214,
322
--
-21
4,32
2
16,5
0016
,500
8,62
08,
620
9,65
89,
658
179,
544
179,
544
214,
322
--
-21
4,32
2
FY20
13:
$396,1
22
UN
ITE
DW
AY
FY2014
514-
22D
irec
tor
520-
22FI
CAM
atch
521-
22S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
22H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
22W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
22U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
525-
2240
1-K
530-
22T
rave
l
540-
22O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
542-
22P
rofe
ssio
nal
Fee
s54
4-22
Pos
tage
545-
22P
rint
ing
546-
22R
ent
547-
22T
elep
hone
c—i
cD58
0-22
Indi
rect
Cos
ts
650-
22E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
436-
22U
nite
dW
ayT
otal
Rev
enue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
LB
UD
GE
TR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
BU
DG
ET
12,4
8012
,480
1,26
0
1,69
8
300
26,8
55
6,00
0
550
300
1,50
0
1,26
0
1,69
8
300
26,8
55
26,8
5526
,855
26,8
55-
--
26,8
55
955
450
102
600
660
6,00
0
550
300
1,50
0
955
450
102
600
660
0 CD S
FY
2013
:$2
6,85
5
H.S
.T
RA
NSP
OR
TA
TIO
NPL
AN
NIN
G
FY2014
512-
24P
lann
ing
Man
ager
514-
24P
rogr
amS
peci
alis
t
520-
24FI
CAM
atch
521-
24S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
24H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
24W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
24U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
525-
2440
1-K
530-
24T
rave
l
540-
24O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
544-
24P
osta
ge
545-
24P
rint
ing
547-
24T
elep
hone
580-
24In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
24E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
24U
DO
TC
ontr
act
403-
24L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on
405-
24C
arry
Ove
r
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EAR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ETR
EVIS
ION
SR
EVIS
ION
SR
EVIS
ION
SB
UD
GET
3,50
23,
502
8,58
1
924
1,83
2
4,41
5
267 97 168
1,00
0
300
200
380
200
2,37
4
760
25,0
00
4,41
5
267 97 168
1,00
0
300
200
380
200
2,37
4
760
25,0
00
20,0
0020
,000
5,00
05,
000
25,0
00-
--
25,0
00
8,58
1*
924
1,83
2
1
FY
2013
:$2
5,00
0
Exe
cuti
veD
irec
tor
7,30
07,
300
Dir
ecto
r66
,336
66,3
36P
lanner
s91
,318
91,3
18FI
CA
Mat
ch12
,619
12,6
19S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
24,7
3224
,732
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e45
,457
45
A5
Wo
rker
sC
om
pen
sati
on
3,64
53,
645
Unem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e1,
020
1,02
040
1-K
882
882
Tra
vel
12,0
0012
,000
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s3,
000
3,00
0C
ontr
acte
dS
ervi
ces
10,0
0010
,000
Consu
ltan
tS
ervi
ces
137,
000
147,
000
Age
ncy
Ser
vice
s30
030
0P
ost
age
3,00
02,
250
Pri
ntin
g3,
500
3,50
0R
ent
1,00
01,
000
Tel
eph
on
e1,
000
1,00
0S
oft
war
eL
icen
sing
1,25
02,
000
Indi
rect
Cos
ts30
,397
30,3
97E
quip
men
t1,
000
1,00
0D
epar
tmen
tT
ota
l4
56
,75
64
66
,75
6
Sta
teC
ontr
act-
UD
OT
Loc
alP
arti
cipa
tion
Car
ryO
ver
Tot
alR
even
ueTR
AN
SPO
RT
AT
ION
PLA
NN
ING
FY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T51
1-25
512-
25
514-
25
520-
25
521-
25
522-
25
523-
25
524-
25
525-
25
530-
25
540-
25
541-
25
542-
25
543-
25
544-
25
545-
25
546-
25
547-
25
557-
25
580-
25
650-
25
402-
25
403-
25
405-
25
0 S
10,0
00
(750
)
750
10,0
00-
-
391,
000
10,0
004
01
,00
044
,000
44,0
00
21,7
5621
,756
45
6,7
56
10,0
00-
-4
66
,75
6
FY20
13:
$402,0
00
SEN
IOR
CO
MPA
NIO
NPR
OG
RA
M
FY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T51
2-27
Dir
ecto
r5,
291
5,29
1514-2
7C
oord
inat
or
12,4
25
12,4
25
516-
27A
ccou
ntin
gT
ech
1,09
51,
095
520-
27FI
CA
Mat
ch1,
439
1,43
952
1-27
Sta
teR
etir
emen
t2,
602
2,60
2
522-
27H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
8,46
98,
469
523-
27W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
412
412
524-
27U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e19
719
7
525-
2740
1-K
555
555
530-
27T
rave
l90
090
053
3-27
Rec
ogni
tion
500
200
700
535-
27V
olu
nte
erT
rave
l22
,500
22,5
0054
0-27
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s1,
200
1,20
054
1-27
Bac
kgro
und
Che
cksJ
Fin
gerp
rint
ing
1,47
3(2
00)
1,27
3C
)54
2-27
Mea
ls3,
400
3,40
0C-
’.)54
3-27
Sti
pen
ds
60,8
7460
,874
544-
27P
ost
age
595
545-
27P
rint
ing
800
800
546-
27R
ent
516
516
54
7-2
]T
elep
ho
ne
1,10
01,
100
555-
27In
sura
nce
121
121
580-
27In
dire
ctC
osts
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-2
7D
OA
Sta
teC
ontr
act
403-2
7L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on
404-
27P
roje
ctIn
com
e
405-
27C
arry
Ove
r
406-2
7D
onat
ions
408-
27F
eder
alC
ontr
act
To
tal
Rev
enu
e
3,89
83,
898
130,
362
--
-13
0,36
2
5,50
05,
500
18,0
0018
,000
14,3
0014
,300
92,5
6292
,562
130,
362
--
-13
0,36
2
FY20
13:
$147
,723
512-
28D
irec
tor
514-
28C
oord
inat
or
516-
28S
ecre
tary
520-
28R
CA
Mat
ch
521-
28S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
28H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
28W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
28U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
rance
530-
28T
rave
l
540-
28O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
541-
28R
enta
lA
ssis
tanc
e
542-
28C
onsu
ltan
ts/
Contr
acts
544-
28P
ost
age
545-
28P
rint
ing
546-
28R
ent
547-
28T
elep
ho
ne
551-
28U
ncla
ssif
ied
Oth
er
580-
28In
dire
ctC
osts
650
28E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-2
8C
SBG
Sta
teC
ontr
act
404-2
8P
roje
ctIn
com
e
Tot
alR
even
ue
29,6
86
5,18
1
11,7
09
21,4
79
1,49
7
548
10,0
00
2,11
5
114,
588
1,98
4
2,00
0
2,50
01,
500
5,00
0
11,5
05
12,9
77
2,40
0
273,
207
11,7
09
21,4
79
1,49
7
548
10,0
00
2,11
5
8,50
0
114,
588
1,98
4
2,00
0
4,00
0
5,00
0
1,50
5
12,9
77
2,40
0
-27
3,20
7
CSB
G
FY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
38,0
3838
,038
29,6
86
5,18
1
CD
8,50
0
(10,
000)
273,
207
273,
207
273,
207
--
-27
3,20
7
FY
2013
:$2
74,7
39
IRO
NC
OU
NTY
RPO
FY20
14
512-
32P
lann
ing
Man
ager
514-
32P
lann
er
520-
32FI
CAM
atch
521-
32S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
522-
32H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
32W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
32U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e52
5-32
401-
K53
0-32
Tra
vel
540-
32O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
541-
32Ir
onC
ount
yA
dmin
(5%
)
542-
32C
onsu
ltan
tS
ervi
ces
544-
32P
osta
ge
545-
32P
rint
ing
546-
32R
ent
547-
32T
elep
hone
580-
32In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
32E
quip
men
t
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
32U
DO
TC
ontr
act
403-
32L
ocal
Par
tici
pati
on
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EAR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ETR
EVIS
ION
SR
EVIS
ION
SR
EVIS
ION
SB
UD
GET
3,50
23,
502
13,8
09
1,32
4
1,55
0
6,12
7
383
134 44
2,16
9
434
2,00
0
2,48
0
247
500
772
700
3,22
5
600
40,0
00
10,0
0010
,000
30,0
0030
,000
40,0
00-
--
40,0
00
0 m
13,8
09
1,32
4
1,55
0
6,12
7
383
134 44
2,16
9
434
2,00
0
2,48
0
247
500
772
700
3,22
5
600
40,0
00
FY20
13:
$43,
700
540-
33O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
544-
33P
osta
ge
545-
33P
rint
ing
546-
33R
ent
547-
33T
elep
hone
Aff
ilia
te:
HA
BIT
AT
FOR
HU
MA
NIT
YFY
2014
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
250
250
4,10
0-
--
4,10
0
4,10
04,
100
4,10
0-
--
4,10
0
200
600
100
2,95
0
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
404-
33P
roje
ctIn
com
e
Tot
alR
even
ue
C)
FY
2013
:$4
,100
200
600
100
2,95
0
1
NE
WC
HO
ICE
SW
AIV
ER
FY2014
512-
36D
irec
tor
514-
36C
ase
Man
ager
s
516-
36S
ecre
tary
517-
36N
urse
s
520-
36FI
CAM
atch
10,3
0452
1-36
Sta
teR
etir
emen
t20
,901
522-
36H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
31,2
0652
3-36
Work
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
2,97
852
4-36
Unem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e1,
367
525-
3640
1-K
768
530-
36T
rave
l10
,450
540-
36O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
1,03
854
4-36
Post
age
350
5040
054
5-36
Pri
ntin
g85
030
01,
250
C’.) —
i54
6-36
Ren
t4,
000
4,00
054
7-36
Tel
ephone
3,50
03,
500
549-
36C
ontr
acte
dS
ervi
ces
35,0
0035
,000
580-
36In
dire
ctC
osts
26,0
9726
,097
650-
36E
quip
men
t1,
239
1,23
9D
epar
tmen
tT
otal
298,
050
329,
144
402-
36S
tate
Con
trac
t
405-
36C
arry
Ove
r
Tot
alR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
L
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T
18,7
1218
,712
110,
880
28,3
4413
9,22
4
5,11
045
05,
560
15,2
50
10,3
04
20,9
01
31,2
06
2,97
8
1,36
7
768
8,50
01,
950
1,03
8
15,2
50
31,0
94-
-
298,
050
18,5
2431
6,57
4
-12
,570
12,5
7029
8,05
031
,094
--
329,
144
FY20
13:
$275
,000
ST
.G
EO
RG
ED
OW
NP
AY
ME
NT
AS
SIS
TA
NC
E
APP
RO
VE
D
BU
DG
ET
__
__
__
__
________
__
__
__
__
______
Pla
nner
14,2
2914
,229
FICA
Mat
ch1,
089
1,08
9S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
2,46
02,
460
Hea
lth
Insu
ranc
e8,
109
8,10
9W
orke
r’s
Com
pen
sati
on
314
314
Unem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e17
717
740
1-K
-
Tra
vel
500
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s20
0
Clo
sing
Cos
ts69
,307
Pos
tage
Pri
ntin
g
Tel
epho
ne10
010
0In
dire
ctC
osts
3,16
53,
165
Eq
uipm
ent
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__________________
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
403-37
St.
Geo
rg
eC
DB
GA
greem
ent
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
__
________________
Tot
alR
even
ue
FY2014
514-
37
520-
37
521-
37
522-
37
523-
37
524-
37
525-
37
530-
37
540-
37
542-
37
544-
37
545-
37
547-
37
580-
37
650-
37
MID
-YE
AR
FIN
AL
AD
MIN
FIN
AL
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SB
UD
GE
T 500
200
69,3
0720
0(1
50)
50
150
150
300
0 m ‘S
100,
000
--
-10
0,00
0
100,
000
100,
000
100,
000
--
-10
0,00
0
FY20
13;
$155
,365
CR
ITIC
AL
NEE
DS
HO
USI
NG
FY
2014
514-
44P
lann
er
520-
44FI
CAM
atch
521-
44S
tate
Ret
irem
ent/
401-K
522-
44H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
44W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-
44U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
rance
541-
44H
ousi
ngA
ssis
tanc
e58
0-44
Indi
rect
Cos
ts
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-4
4S
tate
Contr
act
Tota
lR
even
ue
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
LB
UD
GE
TR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
BU
DG
ET
-1,
071
1,07
1-
20,0
00-
-20
,000
-20
,000
20,0
00
-20
,000
--
20,0
00
FY
2013
:N
/A
6,00
0
460
1,00
0
1,29
9
100 70
10,0
00
100 70
10,0
00
6,00
0
460
1,00
0
1,29
9
TA
NF
PRO
GR
AM
C’)F
Y20
14
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
INFI
NA
LB
UD
GE
TR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
BU
DG
ET
512-
40D
irec
tor
Sal
ary
4,96
24,
962
514-
40P
lann
erS
alar
y10
,178
10,1
78*
520-
40FI
CAM
atch
1,15
81,
158
521-
40S
tate
Ret
irem
ent
2,61
82,
618
522-
40H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
4,72
34,
723
523-
40W
orke
r’s
Com
pen
sati
on
335
335
524-
40U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e13
013
052
5-40
401-
1K-
530-
40T
rave
l74
974
954
0-40
Off
ice
Sup
plie
s18
418
454
1-40
TAN
FN
eedy
Fam
ily
Exp
ense
s31
,313
5,19
436
,507
544-
40P
ost
age
184
184
545-
40P
rint
ing
184
184
546-
40R
ent
5,01
0(5
,010
)54
7-40
Tel
ephone
184
(184
)58
0-40
Indi
rect
Cos
ts
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
402-
40S
tate
Con
trac
tT
otal
Rev
enue
2,89
22,
892
64,8
04-
--
64,8
04
64,8
0464
,804
64,8
04-
--
64,8
04
P120
13:
$67,
188
MU
TU
AL
SELF
HEL
P
FY2014
512-
44P
rogr
amD
irec
tor
514-
44P
rogr
amS
peci
alis
t
520-
44FI
CA
Mat
ch
521-
44S
tate
Ret
irem
ent/
401-K
522-
44H
ealt
hIn
sura
nce
523-
44W
ork
ers
Com
pen
sati
on
524-4
4U
nem
plo
ym
ent
Insu
ranc
e
530-4
4T
rave
l
541-
44A
dver
tisi
ng
540-
44O
ffic
eS
uppl
ies
542-
44C
ontr
acto
rC
osts
544-
44P
ost
age
545-
44P
rint
ing
546-
44R
ent
-54
7-44
Tel
eph
on
e&
cell
phones
(2)
580-
44In
dire
ctC
osts
650-
44E
quip
men
t
651-
44T
ools
402-4
4S
tate
Contr
act
To
tal
Rev
enu
e
APP
RO
VE
DM
ID-Y
EA
RFI
NA
LA
DM
IN
BU
DG
ET
RE
VIS
ION
SR
EV
ISIO
NS
RE
VIS
ION
S
-18
,000
-28
,000
-3,
519
-7,
953
-19
,800
-1,
017
-1,
131
-5,
000
-2,
000
-1,
500
-48
,000
-50
0
-1,
500
-5,
000
-3,
400
-9,
530
-2,
500
FIN
AL
BU
DG
ET
18,0
00
28,0
00
3,51
9
Dep
artm
ent
Tot
al
0 m ‘S
7,95
3
19,8
00
1,01
7
1,13
1
5,00
0
2,00
0
1,50
0
48
,00
0
500
1,50
0
5,00
0
3,40
0
9,53
0
2,50
0
-2,
600
2,60
0
-16
0,95
0-
-16
0,95
0
-16
0,95
016
0,95
0
-16
0,95
0-
-16
0,95
0
FY20
13:
N/A
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-A.
PUBLIC NOTICE In compliance with the
COMMUNITY DE- Americans with Dis
VELOPMENT abilities Act, individuals needing special
BLOCK GRANT(CDBG) accommodations (in-
SECOND PUBLIC cluding auxiliary corn-
HEARING municative aids and
THE FfVE couwr services) during this
ASSOCIATION OF hearing should notify
COVERNMENTS Diane , Lamoreaux
(AOG) will hold a pub- (435-6733548) at 1070
tic hearing to discuss W. 1600 S., Building B,
the following project(s) St. George, UT 84770
determined to be a at least three days
tilied for in the F’Y prior to the public
2014 CDBG Small Ci- hearing. Individuals
ties Program: Five with speech and/or
County AOG - CDBG hearing impairments
Program Administra- may call the RelayUtah by dialing 711,
tion, Consolidated Plan Spanish Relay Utah; 1-Planning, Economic 888-346-3162.I)evelopment (ED) Please publish onceTechnical Assistance, Sunday, March 2, 2014RLF and Flousing Pro- in both the northerngram Delivery, and and southern editionshousing and Facilities of The Spectrum.Assessment Planning.This is an on-going PUB#L9342project which provides Publishedstalling for the above- March 2, 2014mentioned activities. The SpectrumThis public hearing U1’AXLPwill be held in conjunction with the AOGSteering Committeemeeting which beginsat 1:00 pin. on Wednesday, March 12,2014 in the BeaverCity Office, ConferenceRoom, 30 W. 300 N.,Beaver, UT.Comments will be soIlcited on the project(s)scope, implementationand its effect on residents. Details of theproject will be discused, including theamount of grant moneyreceived. The AOGwill respond to specificconcerns and questionsof all individuals. Further information canbe obtained by contacting Diane Lamoreauxat (435) 673-3548 [email protected]
42
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B.
PUBLIC NOTICECONSOLIDATEDPLAN UPDATE
The Five County Association of GovernmentsP’CAOG) has corn pie-
ted a draft update ofthe Five County Consoidated Plan. A thirty-
day public commentpernod commences onMarch 1, 2014 and willnd March 31, 2014.The Consolidated Planpertains to housing,community and economic development issues for counties andmunicipalities withinBeaver, Garfield, Iron,Kane and Washingtonuountie.Anyone desiring to review the updated planmay do so at theFCAOG office locatedat 1070 W. 1600 S.,Bldg. B., St. Ucorge,UT, from 8:00 am. to5:00 p.m., Mondaythrough Friday, or onthe web at:www. fivecounty.utah.guv/conplan.htmlA public hearing on thedocument will be heldin conjunction with theF’CAOG Steering (‘em
LEGAL NOTICES
mittee meeting whichbegins at 1:00 p.m. onWednesday, March 12,2014 at the BeaverCity Office, ConferenceRoom, 30 W. 300 N..Beaver, UT.Further informationmay be obtained bycontacting DianeLamoreaux at 435-673-3548.Published in “TheSpectrum Saturday,March 1, 2014.
PUB#L9337Pubjished
March 1, 2014The Spectrum
UPAXLP
43
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
FWE COUNTY ASSOCIATIONOF GOVERNMENTS
March 1,2014DRAFT
Consolidated PlanANNUAL ACTION PLAN
2014
FOR THE HUD NON-ENTITLEMENT ENTITIES INBEAVER, GARFIELD, IRON, KANE AND WASHINGTON COUNTIES
IN SOUTHWESTERN UTAH
f ___
14
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
Five County Association of Governments Consolidated Plan -Action Plan 2014
CHAPTER I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A. EVALUATION OF CURRENT NEEDS
Local elected officials in southwestern Utah continue to foster a cooperative allocation offederal, state, and local funds to address regional priorities. This cooperative spirit hasbeen the norm for more than 50 years. Community development and human servicesstaff at the Association of Governments have worked diligently to document 2014priorities, as reflected in the Consolidated Plan template. The complete document isavailable on the Five County AOG website at:http: / /www.fivecounty.utah.gov/dep/communitv/consoljdated.php
Housing
For a number of years officials in the more urbanized areas of our region focusedon workforce housing issues, while in the more rural areas the focus was onprograms and funding for traditional low income housing programs. The 2008-2011 recession created less of an impetus for focus on these issues. The decreasein housing prices has opened new opportunities for low to moderate incomefamilies to enter the homeowner status, but that has been tempered by morestringent credit policies.
• Southwestern Utah leaders continue to pursue efforts to end chronichomelessness, but those efforts must compete with other priorities. TheHousing First concept is being implemented in the region.
• Visioning processes through the Vision Dixie (Washington County) and IronDestiny (Iron County) exercises focused on means by which communities couldhelp reduce housing costs. Some of the ideas discussed included improvingpermitting processing and re-evaluating impact fee structures. Another optionthat could be considered is implementation of design standards for higherdensity housing models. Economic conditions brought about by the housingdownturn and economic recession have lowered the cost of housing, but thatadvantage has been coupled with a severe tightening of credit requirements.Potential home buyers will continue to be challenged in obtaining credit in achanging financial market. There will continue to be a need to educate andprepare home buyers, especially first-time home buyers.
• The Five County Association of Governments is prepared to continue toadminister the St. George City Down Payment Assistance Program and to a smalldegree a regional Down Payment Assistance Program.
Community Development
• Community infrastructure remains a key focus of regional investment of funding.This is a combination of aging systems needing upgrading and expansionnecessitated by growth demands. Culinary water and emergency services arehigh priorities. With the exception of housing, our region’s priorities revolvearound providing for infrastructure needs.
45
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
• A three-fold evaluation process has identified focus communities in the region. AHousing Condition Windshield Survey was updated in 2012. A voluntarycommunity self-assessment was utilized along with community developmentprogram staff knowledge and expertise. The focus communities identified belowcontinue to be a regional priority. These communities include:
• Town of Alton (Housing Conditions)• Big Water (Housing Conditions & Community Assessment)• LaVerkin City (Community Assessment)• Leeds (Community Assessment)
The Association Staff has worked with a number of these communities in 2012 toundertake several activities as follows:
• Alton - In the past several years we have assisted the town in securingfunding to construct a new fire station and obtaining a wildiand capable firetruck.
• Big Water- Assisted the community to obtain grant funding that enabledthem to develop two phases of a community park and playground. This parkhas greatly improved the lives of the citizens of this small rural community.Assisted the community in obtaining funding for a community wastewatersystem. Households in the community currently dispose of wastewater viaindividual septic systems. However, a general obligation bond in thecommunity failed to pass.
• LaVerkin - Assisting the community in obtaining funding for infrastructureand street repair in a low-income portion of the city. Other recent activitiesincluded updating their affordable housing plan and obtaining funding for aGeologic Hazards study.
• Leeds - Assisted the town in securing technical assistance for reviewing amajor residential development proposal.
Economic Develorment
• Many local jurisdictions in southwestern Utah continue to invest in county/cityeconomic development programs for active business development; however, thecurrent economic recession has resulted in diminishing municipal budgets andsubsequent reductions in staffing. As such, the Five County AOG’s continuationof a regional priorities which include a focus on the Revolving Loan Fund as wellas other technical assistance continues to be vital. We are currently providingcontracted technical planning assistance to Kanab City for current planning.
• Projects in 2013 included work on a Regional Broadband Plan; ongoing supportof the regional Small Business Development Centers including participation inthe Meet the Money People Workshops; and because available housing for aworkforce is critical to economic development, affordable housing plandevelopment for cities.
46
012
52O
500
750
1,00
0
INC
OR
PO
RA
TE
DC
ITIE
SA
ND
To
wN
sIN
TH
EF
IVE
Co
uN
TY
RE
GIO
N
I.y&
L.II,.U
Um
!L
I--—
.
(-
,\,
.—7
[L
egen
d•ii
Cou
nty
II
I—
nte
rtat
ehi
ghw
ay
Cro
ated
bL
eR
ober
tFi
veC
ount
vAO
GG
ISM
arch
20
13
Dat
aSourc
e:A
RC
US
Mh’a
;
—St
ate
high
way
[]
Mun
icip
alco
unta
r,
-
I,-,
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
B. EVALUATION OF PAST PERFORMANCE
The following projects were accomplished during the past year:
Five County AOG - Region: 1) Five County staff provided regional planning includingupdating the region’s Consolidated Plan; community planning for housing, communityand economic development; assistance through attendance at various meetings andreview and development of codes and ordinances; 2) Revolving Loan Fund programdelivery was provided throughout the region to expand economic developmentopportunities, primarily to low and moderate income individuals and businesses byretaining existing jobs and/or creating additional employment. The number of personsbenefitting in 2013 through job retention/creation was 31 individuals; and 3) Housingprogram delivery to foster decent and affordable housing throughout the region. Thisincludes opporlunities for LMI persons through the down payment/closing costassistance program, HOME Rehabilitation Program and Emergency HOME program. Atotal of three homes were completed in 2013 utilizing the HOME RehabilitationProgram. AOG staff utilized CDBG funding to provide program delivery for theirhousing programs. A total ofj households were screened for eligibility and severalapplications and/or projects are at various stages to obtain state approval, inconstruction or pending.
Beaver County: i) Beaver City on behalf of the Beaver City HousingAuthority-- The Beaver City Housing Authority acquired a 15 unit complex andcompleted the rehabilitation of these units to provide additional low-income housingopportunities in Beaver. Beneficiaries total 15 low-income households. This projectprovides decent, safe and affordable housing for residents in the community; and 2)
Minersville Town-- The town of Minersville received $300,000 in CDBG funds toexpand the current size and scope of the town’s existing library. This was a multi-yearproject that received full funding in FY 2012. The project was completed in December,2013. This project provided expansion of the children’s collection, ample space to allowall library activities to be held within the building, as well as additional computer spaceto the public. The project enhances availability and sustainability in the community.The total number of beneficiaries was 907, with 66.9% LMI persons benefltting; and 3)Milford City on Behalf of the Beaver City Housing Authority (BCHA)-- TheBeaver Housing Authority is in the process of acquiring existing housing units in Milfordto provide additional housing opportunities for low-income families. The project willprovide decent, safe and affordable housing for low-income families. The total projectcost is $200,000, with $150,000 from CDBG funds. Acquisition of the Tri-Plex andDuplex is anticipated to take place in February/March 2014. The projected number ofbeneficiaries is 5, all of which are low/moderate income households.
Garfield County: i) Panguitch City-- The city of Panguitch used 15O,000 in CDBGfunds to purchase a new fire truck that has multiple capabilities for use as a wildland firetruck. This vehicle significantly increases the pumping capabilities as well as providesaccess to rural areas that could not be reached previously with the existing equipment.The provision of dependable service is imperative to the health and safety of theresidents of Panguitch City. Purchase of this new fire truck improves the liveability andsustainability for residents. The number of beneficiaries is 1520, with 72.5% being low-to-moderate income beneficiaries.
Iron County: i) Cedar City on behalf of the Cedar City Housing Authority(CCHA)-- The Cedar City Housing Authority has completed construction of the i8 unit
48
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
complex which is located adjacent to their current facility. This project provides anadditional i8 units of LMI housing for elderly and handicapped individuals. All of thenewly constructed units will be rented to low/ moderate income individuals. Thenumber of households benefitting from this project is 18, with all low/moderate incomebeneficiaries; 2) Iron County-- Iron County received S300,000 in CDBG Funds toexpand the Beryl Fire Station with two additional bays, an office area as well asclassroom space to accommodate training activities to serve a very rural part of IronCounty in the Beryl/Newcastle area. The provision of dependable service is imperativeto the health and safety of residents living in this rural service area. This projectimproves the liveability and sutainability for residents living in the service area. Thetotal number of beneficiaries is approximately 1,804, of which 8o.i% are low-to-moderate income beneficiaries; and 3) Cedar City on behalf of the Cedar HousingAuthority-- The CCHA is in the process of acquiring property for the construction oflow income housing. The property will be utilized to provide housing units that will beoccupied by low income families in accordance with the Low Income Housing Tax CreditProgram targeting families earning 60% or less of the AMI for Iron County. All housingprojects of the Cedar City Housing Authority target families earning no more than 80%AMI. Priorities are given to families and individuals earning no more than 50% AMI.This proposed project will provide the opportunity for decent, safe and affordablehousing. The projected number of households benefitting from this project is 3-5, withall low/moderate income beneficiaries.
Kane County: i) Orderville Town-- The town has purchased and installed a backuppower generator for the Red Hollow culinary water well. A major upgrade to theculinary water system was completed in 2008 which included reconstruction of a failingwater tank at the Red Hollow site, as well as a new culinary water well equipped with asubmersible pump. There are currently two water wells located at this site which serveas the primary source of water for the town. In order to provide reliable service duringperiods when a power outage occurs, the town needed to install a propane or dieselpowered backup generator. The provision of dependable service is imperative to thehealth and safety of residents living in Orderville. The project improves the liveabilityand sustainability for residents. The project was funded with CDBG funds and wascompleted in 2013. The total number of beneficiaries is 577, of which 51% are low tomoderate income.
Washington County: i) The Erin Kimball Foundation- - Washington Citysponsored the Erin Kimball Memorial Foundation application to rehabilitate a single-family home. This project will assist in addressing the critical need for additional crisishousing for homeless families fleeing domestic violence and sexual assault. Thefoundation had previously procured this single-family home and has completed some ofthe necessary rehabilitation. CDBG funds are being utilized to complete the remainingamount of needed rehabilitation. A lot of volunteer labor and materials were previouslydonated to the project. The foundation is utilizing some of the donated materials tocomplete the project. The total project cost is $327,050. CDBG funding in the amountof 15o,ooo was received for the project. Donations from anonymous donors andcompanies were used in consideration of the matching funds for this project.Rehabilitation efforts are continuing with an anticipated April 2014 completion date.The facility will also be utilized as office space for the Foundation, will provide a day carearea, training area, and case management services. The total number of beneficiaries is27, of which all are LMI eligible. The proposed project will improve the livability andsustainability of low-income individuals fleeing domestic violence and/or sexual assault.
49
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
Color Country Community Housing, Inc (CCCHI)-- CCCHI completed severalprojects during 2013 including the following: i) Mutual Self Help-- A total of 15homes were completed in Ivins (12) and LaVerkin () with a total funding of$3,282,900.
C. HISTORY OF REGIONAL CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION
Between 1982 and 2013, each of the five southwestern Utah counties received asignificant amount of Community Development Block Grant funding for communitydevelopment projects designed to improve living conditions, primarily for those who areof low to moderate income. The total funding allocation for all five counties isS18,368,633. The graphic below displays the total funding allocation for CDBG funds forcommunities within each of the Five Counties for this time period. This does not includeallocations of CDBG funds for regional projects. Iron County has received the greatestamount of total funding during this time period, followed by Washington, Beaver,Garfield, and Kane Counties.
Funded CDBG projects included: water, fire, wastewater, community facilities,redevelopment/ housing, ADA, public services, medical facilities/ambulances, and floodcontrol related projects. The chart which accompanies each county, in the graphic below,displays the total funding allocation for each project type. The variation in project typedistribution by county reflects the variety of needs in each community throughout theRegion.
$5,220,592
TOTAL CDBG FUNDING ALLOCATION1982-2013
,
GARFIELD
$3,187,752
McI
PcS.r.- -
KANE :—$1,987,924 dpnrc
/kouslng8% -
Fd I
BEAVER$3,228,854
I -
11%
WASHINGTON
$4,743,511
Wastt*atff
50
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
D. FUNDING PRIORITY DECISION MAKING PROCESS
The Five County Association of Governments utilizes a comprehensive rating & rankingmatrix to determine the priority for funding of all applications for CDBG. The criteria isapproved by the local elected officials functioning as the Rating & Ranking Committee(RRC). The projects in 2013 were evaluated utilizing the matrix and recommendationsfor funding were presented to the Rating & Ranking Committee for prioritization. Acopy of the FY 2014 Rating & Ranking Criteria, Policies and Guidelines is found inAppendix C.
E. SUMMARY OF CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND CONSULTATION
Continued consultation and coordination with agencies in this region and the publictook place in the development of this one-year action plan. In addition, ongoingparticipation by the three public housing authorities in the region was instrumental inthe development of this plan.
The Five County Community Action Partnership has engaged a wide variety ofcommunity stakeholders in identifying community needs (through meetings, surveys,forums and data collection) on a host of issues including income, nutrition, mentalhealth and substance abuse issues, youth issues, education, employment, housing,transportation and healthcare.
A comprehensive picture of the conditions combined with a thorough understanding ofthe causes of poverty is indispensable to the achievement of strategic community goals.The belief is this picture of conditions can assist to:
• Create prospects for community coordination and partnerships• Determine resource allocation and coordination (volunteers and dollars)• Indicate causes and conditions of poverty• Provide information for grants and assist with the ability to seek out new grants• Address specific community needs, identify gaps• Identify where the community is and ensure services meet the community needs• Guide staff training and agency strategic planning.
By understanding one assessment and pooling efforts to get significant, relevant data,agencies can better coordinate services, direct change (rather than maintaining thestatus quo), and set the framework for innovation in service delivery. A community-based needs assessment can also be a basic for creating change by providing importantcommunity information as to who maybe working on issues and finding where gaps inthe community services lie. The information provides an opportunity to meet anddevelop partnerships strengthening services for citizens in the area.
Perhaps the most daunting of tasks in a community assessment is determining howmuch and what data to gather and analyze. Five County adopted core data and datapoints from both the statistical data designed by the Community Action Partnership -
National, as well as integrating data from the Community Action Partnership - Utah2012 Poverty Report.
A Needs Assessment survey was developed after reviewing other Community ActionPartnership surveys and collaborating with various key community stakeholders. The
51
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
survey was created to determine how individuals perceived the social needs in theircommunity and supplements the statistical data that was gathered. Not only existingcustomers/clients but also key partner agencies, elected officials, business owners andother service providers were surveyed. The survey includes information regardingdemographics and opinions about employment, education, housing, income and healthcare issues.
Five County Conununity Action Partnership gathered a total of 852 surveysfrom March 12, 2013 through April 30, 2013. Surveys were distributed onlinethrough Survey Monkey, e-mail and web sites. Additionally, local partners distributedpaper surveys to community members. A range of participants completed surveys. Thelargest age group (36.5%) were between 24 to 44 years of age, while the second largestgroup (30.2%) were between 55 to 69 years of age. The female population (61.8%)completed the largest amount of surveys. A total of 95.9% of those that completed thesurvey were white or Caucasian. Households with two parents and children totaled37.3% and couples with no children totaled 31.3%. Over one-third (38.9%) of those thatcompleted the survey had an income of less than $30,000. It was reported that 72.4%
were employed, 21% received Social Security, 16.1% reported they were self-employedand 15.0% reported they collected a pension. Individuals surveyed stated that 19.6% hada high school degree or GED, and 31.4% reported they had some college or trade school,and 46.7% reported they had a bachelor’s degree or higher professional degrees.
The Human Services Council for the five counties decided prioritization of needs. Theyare as follows:
1. Beaver County-- Nutrition, Emergency services and Food pantry support
2. Garfield County-- Nutrition, Emergency services, Food pantry support,Transportation, Seniors, Youth
3. Iron County -- Nutrition, Emergency services, Food pantry support, Educationservices, Domestic violence
4. Kane County-- Nutrition, Emergency services, Food pantry support, Youth service
5. Washington County-- Education and Youth services
Appendix D contains the Community Needs Assessment survey and discussion.
A primary purpose of the Association of Governments is to coordinate federal, state andlocal programs across southwest Utah. Much of this coordination involves aspects of theconsolidated planning process, with these efforts detailed in Chapter 7.
F. PRIORITIES
The HOME program is administered by the state of Utah, Division of Housing andCommunity Development, Olene Walker Housing Loan Fund and funding priorities areestablished by the loan board. Table 6-i, Chapter 6 includes HOME services forsouthwestern Utah which are provided through the Five County Association ofGovernments. Please refer to the following website for detailed funding priorities andallocation process: http: //housing.utah.gov/owhlf/programs.html
52
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
The Balance of State Continuum of Care has determined that their application isconsistent with the jurisdiction’s current approved Consolidated Plan identified as needsto end chronic homelessness and move families and individuals to permanent housing:
Expansion of each CoC Board: Additional members serving on the CoC Boardare intended to represent a broader array of community voices to provide theirexpertise.
i Streamlined coordinated assessment: CoCs must develop a coordinatedassessment process wherein agencies across the CoC using consistent and bestpractice models for needs assessment, and agency or service provider referrals basedon centralized assessment requirements.
• Improve Policies and Procedures: Develop policies and procedures that ensureopenness and transparency in the operation of CoCs.
• Identify Programs for Transition: Due to challenges from the high cost ofservice, agencies that fail to meet HUD goals for outcome measures will need totransition their programs into other types of services. The community will identifythe necessity of existing programs, how they can be maintained, and plan for theirtransition to new services.
• Emphasize Outcomes: Program funding decisions will be based on improvingoutcomes including reducing the length of homeless episodes, reduction inrecidivism rates, improvement in employment and wages, increased access tomainstream services, and increased housing stability.
Projects which were funded from the Balance of State Continuum of Care 2013 include:
• Cedar City Housing Authority-- Transitional Housing ($14,177.00);• Southwest Behavioral Health Center-- Dixie View ($28,994.00);• Iron County Care & Share-- La Casa Transitional Housing ($,3’.oo);• Southwest Behavioral Health Center-- Housing Matter Project
($156,414.00)• Erin Kimball Memorial Foundation-- No Place Like H.O.M.E.
($75,000.00)
1. Housing
The regional priorities of the Five County Association of Governments relating tohousing include the administration of down payment assistance programs,rehabilitation of deteriorated housing stock, rehabilitation of existing rental units,providing better availability of safe and adequate affordable rentals, providingseasonal rental housing to support the tourism industry, and developing more waterand sewer capacity for housing development in growth areas.
2. Community Development
Taking into consideration the locally identified Community Development capitalproject lists submitted by local jurisdictions, as well as housing needs identified inaffordable housing plans developed throughout the region, community developmentpriorities utilizing CDBG funds in this region are outlined below:
53
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
• LMI Housing Activities-- Regional efforts will continue to focus on projectsdesigned to provide for the housing needs of very low and low-moderate incomefamilies. This may include the development of infrastructure for LMI housingprojects, home buyers assistance programs, land acquisition or the actualconstruction of housing units for elderly, low-income and homeless individuals,housing rehabilitation, CROWN rent-to-own homes; mutual self help, andLIHTC projects.
Public Utility Infrastructure-- Regional efforts will focus on increasing thecapacity of water and other utility systems to better serve the customers and/orimprove fire flow capacity. Includes wastewater disposal projects. TypicallyCDBG funds are utilized for these type of projects to cover engineering costs.
• Public Safety Activities-- Efforts will be concentrated on addressing projectsrelated to protection of property, including flood control or fire protectionimprovements in a community. Priority should be given to developing additionalfire protection such as new stations in areas that are currently unserved orunder-served.
• Community Facilities/Public Services-- Regional support will be providedto jurisdictions undertaking construction of projects such as senior citizenscenters; health clinics; food banks/shelters; and/or public service activities.These activities traditionally have no available revenue source for funding andhave typically been turned down by other funding sources. This category doesnot include facilities that are primarily recreational in nature.
• Transportation-- Jurisdictions throughout the region will continue to focus onaddressing transportation related projects, i.e., streets/bridges, curb, gutter,sidewalks to address drainage issues and airport improvements. The use ofCDBG funds for these types of projects is extremely limited due to the nature andhigher level of funding needed.
• Parks and Recreation-- Jurisdictions will continue to foster projects designedto enhance the recreational quality of a community i.e., new picnic facilities,playgrounds, community recreation centers, trails, etc. While parks are animportant amenity to communities, the focus of funding in this Region will bedirected towards needed infrastructure, facilities, and affordable housing.
• Planning-- Jurisdictions throughout the region will continue to direct planningefforts towards feasibility studies and various planning for projects such as stormdrainage, water system master plans, senior citizen center design, city housingdata base and capital facilities plans.
• Economics-- Some of the jurisdictions in the Five County Region are takingsteps to rehabilitate historic buildings and/or museums that play a vital role interms of historic community values and to foster tourism in the area. The recentrenovation of the historic Beaver County Courthouse building is an example ofthis.
54
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
3. Economic Development
Chapter 3 identifies the following economic development priorities:
• Provide regionally-focused services that complement county and communityeconomic development programs.
• Focus efforts on jurisdictions that do not have internal staff support to provideday-to-day economic development outreach.
• Represent southwestern Utah interests at conferences and forums.
• Forge closer ties between economic development and public/higher educationinitiatives in the region.
• Continue to champion support for regional projects that foster economicdevelopment.
4. Summary of One year Performance Measures
It is anticipated that the following projects will be completed during the upcomingyear (based on applications received for 2014):
Five County Region: i) Consolidated Plan Planning, Administration,Rating and Ranking-- AOG staff will provide assistance to communities inupdating the regional Consolidated Plan, general CDBG program administration andcontinue in the identification of focus communities/ neighborhoods throughout theregion; 2) Economic Development (Revolving Loan Fund ProgramDelivery)-- The RLF program is designed to provide economic developmentopportunity primarily to low to moderate income individuals and businesses byretaining existing jobs and/or creating additional employment. The program jobcreating is set at ijob for every S15,000 lent; 3) Housing Program Delivery--Staff will continue to provide program delivery (approximately 30 households) tofoster decent, safe and affordable housing opportunities for low-income persons byproviding down payment/closing cost assistance, HOME rehabilitation of existinghousing units to enhance health and safety through addressing health code andsafety concerns; and 4) Planning- - CED staff has been working with the largercommunities throughout the region to develop and/or update their affordablehousing plans. Staff will continue with this planning effort by providing assistanceto Escalante and LaVerkin cities. A biannual report and application of the newhousing plan model will be applied to the Milford City housing plan. CED staff willalso work with each jurisdiction throughout the Five County Region to assess anddevelop a facilities infrastructure assessment.
Beaver County: i) Beaver City on Behalf of the Beaver City HousingAuthority (BCHA)-- The Beaver Housing Authority is proposing to construct anew office building adjacent to their i8-unit public housing apartments. The currentfacility utilized as an office is an older single-family home that is not accessible tohandicapped individuals and it is difficult for elderly clients to navigate the entranceas well. The housing authority works diligently throughout Beaver County to providedecent, safe and affordable housing for low-income families. The total project cost is$162,363. The CDBG application is $150,000. The projected number of
55
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
beneficiaries is 101 households, all of which are low/moderate income individuals.
Garfield County: There were no applications submitted by Garfield County and/orany jurisdictions within the county.
Iron County: There were no application submitted by Iron County and/or anyjurisdications within the county.
Kane County: i) Kane County-- The county is proposing to purchase two four-wheel drive meals-on-wheels vehicles. Acquisition of these vehicles will provide theopportunity to expand services as well as to provide service to areas that are difficultto access during winter months. It is proposed that trucks will be located inOrderville and Kanab. The four-wheel drive trucks are needed to serve rural areasthat do not have oiled or well maintained road access. The projected number ofbeneficiaries is 65. The county is requesting $87,517 in CDBG funds and the countyis providing $10,000 in match funds for procurement of these vehicles. Theproposed project will improve the liveability and sustainability of elderly individuals;and 2) Big Water Town-- The town submitted an application for CDBG funds toexpand their current fire station. The application was incomplete because sufficientfunding was not included to complete construction of the project. State CDBG staffdetermined that the application was not threshold eligible for rating and ranking.AOG staff will work with Big Water to determine the appropriate course of actionand will assist with an application to the Utah Permanent Community Impact FundBoard (PCIFB). The town also has the option to apply for CDBG funds in the nextprogram year to expand the fire station.
Washington County: i) Enterprise City-- The city is proposing to construct anew fire station to serve the community. The city has purchased land for a firestation, as well as other community needs. They have started some rough gradingand site work, and have hired a design team to complete the construction drawingsand oversee construction of the new fire station. The new fire station will containeight new bays. The City will also continue to utilize the old fire station. The newfacility will provide the opportunity to house their current equipment, as well asaccommodate modest future expansion. The total number of beneficiaries is 1711, ofwhich 1,147 (67.3%) are LMI eligible. The proposed project will improve thelivability and sustainability of the area as well as to address public safety; 2) AngeIlSprings SSD -- Washington County is sponsoring the Angell Springs SSDapplication to acquire CDBG funding. The district is proposing to complete culinarywater system improvements in the site specific area. The proposed project is neededto eliminate stagnant water in the dead-end lines and ultimately improve waterquality in this area. Installation of the new looped water lines will also improve fireflows throughout the area. The district is requesting $150,000 of CDBG funds tocomplete this project. The total number of beneficiaries is 193, of which io8 (55.9%)are LMI eligible. The proposed project will improve the livability and sustainabilityof low-income residents in this area; 3) Gunlock Fire Station-- WashingtonCounty is sponsoring a CDBG application from the Northwestern Special ServiceDistrict, which includes the area of Gunlock. The district proposes to construct anew fire station in the town of Gunlock utilizing $150,000 in CDBG funds,Permanent Community Impact Board funds in the amount of $148,035, and SSDmatch funds in the amount of $20,525. The total number of proposed beneficiariesis io6, with 8i (76.4%) being LMI eligible. The SSD engaged the services of anarchitect who has completed design of the facility to make this a very mature project;
56
AGENDA ITEM # Ill-B. (Continued)
and 4) Utah Food Bank-- Washington County is sponsoring the CDBGapplication from the Utah Food Bank to purchase a 22’ refrigerated box truck for usein the outline five county area. The truck will be utilized to collect and distributedonated food from local grocery stores, distribute emergency food to local foodpantries, deliver food to low-income children through the Back Pack program and todeliver food to low-income seniors through the Food Box program. The totalamount of funding requested from the CDBG program is $90,158. The Utah FoodBank is contributing $25,000 towards the truck purchase. The total number ofproposed beneficiaries is 12,596, all of which are LMI eligible. The proposed projectwill improve the livability and sustainability of low income individuals throughoutthe Five County region, including children and the elderly.
57
AGENDA ITEM # V.
Five County Association of Governments
1070 West 1600 South, Building B Post Office Box 1550St. George, Utah 84770 St. George, Utah 84771
Fax (435) 673-3540 Office (435) 673.3548
SOUTHWEST UTAH
***M EM OR AND U M***
TO: Five County AOG Steering Committee Members
FROM: 5ary 0. Zabriskie, Director of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT: Appointments for Revolving Loan Fund Board
DATE: March 4, 2014
The Five County Association of Governments has operated a Revolving Loan Fund (RLF) since July1986. The RLF is intended to provide supplemental financing to start-up and growing businesses inthe region that may not be able to generate adequate capital from private sector lenders. The RLF“fills the gap” between available private sector debt and equity capital and the owner’s capitalresources. In 25 years of operation. the RLF has injected more than $8 million into 123 businessdeals, resulting in the creation of more than 800 jobs.
The RLF is operated pursuant to policies outlined in the regional Revolving Loan Fund Plan adoptedin July 1987, as amended in November 2010. The RLF is administered by the Five County LoanAdministration Board, The nine (9) member board is composed of the following:
2 Bankers2 Business Owners/ManagersI Utah Workforce Services Western Regional Council RepresentativeI Five County Economic Development District Representative (Steering Committee rep.)1 Equity/Investment Representative1 Chamber of Commerce RepresentativeI County or Municipal Attorney
The individuals listed on the following pages have all agreed to serve on the RLF Board for the termsindicated. The RLF Board members will elect a Chair and a Vice Chair at their next meeting.
I respectfully request that these nominations be approved by the Steering Committee as proposed.
BEAVER GARFIELD IRON KANE WASHINGTON
,JL
AGENDA ITEM # V. (Continued)
Revolving Loan Fund Board Appointments (continued)March 12, 2014
Five County Association of GovernmentsRevolving Loan Fund Board Appointments
March 12, 2014
There is a Five County Economic Development District representative on the RLF Board. This hastypically been the sitting chair of the Steering Committee, but may be whomever the SteeringCommittee designates as the representative. Commissioner Jim Matson from Kane County has beenserving on the Board. I need appointment of a Steering Committee representative on the Board.This term will run through March 2015.
I propose re-appointing Mr. Darrin Duncan from State Bank of Southern Utah. Darrin is aCompliance Officer at State Bank of Southern Utah. He was a Loan Officer and a Loan SupportOfficer preparing Small Business Administration (SBA) packets prior to becoming a ComplianceOfficer. He has been with the bank since 2000. Prior to working at SBSU he worked as a smallbusiness consultant for the Small Business Development Center at Utah State University. He fillsone of the banker slots. This term will run through March 2016.
Lam proposing re-appointing Mr. West Martin from Town & Country Bank of St. George to serveas the other banker position. West is the Chief Lending Officer at Town & Country Bank, Inc. Andis also an Executive Vice President. He has been in Utah banking circles for approximately 35 yearsas a Utah State Bank Examiner, Senior Credit Examiner and Chief lending Officer at two communitybanks. He has resided in St. George since August of 1996, first in Santa Clara and now in St. George.This term will run through March 2015.
Mr. Eric Clarke, Deputy Washington County Attorney, has agreed continue as the municipal orcounty attorneys representative on the Board. Eric has been serving as the Vice Chair for the RLFBoard. I would ask the Board to reaffirm Eric’s appointment.
Mr. Scott Jolley, Executive Director and CEO of the Cedar City Chamber of Commerce has beenserving on the RLF Board. Scott is a graduate of SUU where he studied accounting and businessmanagement. I would propose that Scott be re-appointed for another term on the Board. Ifreappointed, Scott will continue to be the Chamber of Commerce representative on the Board. Thisterm will run through March 2015.
I propose that Mr. Shaun Warby, CPA, who is the Chief Financial Officer for MSC AerospaceCompany in Cedar City, maker of the new SaberJet corporate jetliner, be appointed to the RLFBoard. He is proposed to replace Mr. David Grant who resigned from the RLF Board as he will beleaving to serve as an LDS Mission President. It is proposed that Shaun will represent “BusinessOwners/Managers.” As a plus, he also brings another CPA to the Board. This term will run throughJune 2016.
AGENDA ITEM # V. (Continued)
Revolving Loan Fund Board Appointments (continued)March 12, 2014
I am proposing that Mr. Kris Braunberger, CPA, be appointed to fill the shoes of Mr. Nick Lang,CPA who has been the Chair of the RLF Board. Kris is with the firm of HintonBurdick CPAs andAdvisors. This term will run through June 2016.
lam proposing that Mr. Paul Campbell, with Southern Utah SCORE be reappointed to the Boardas the investment representative. Paul’s career in banking, finance and lending spanned 38 years,including the final eighteen years as President and CEO of a successful community bank that wasa leading SBA lender in Washington State. He had experience earlier as a commercial lender andmarketing director in four states. A seven year SCORE mentor, he is understands what it takes toqualify for commercial loans, especially small business and SBA loans. He is also an active investor.This term will run through March 2015.
The Workforce Services Western Regional Council Representative slot is currently filled by WayneShamo, owner of Shamo Lumber in Hurricane. That position on the RLF Board will be addressedat the June 2014 Steering Committee meeting.
60
AGENDA ITEM # VI.
Five County Association of Governments
1070 West 1600 South, Building BSt. George, Utah 84770
Fax (435) 673-3540
Post Office Box 1550St. George, Utah 84771
Office (435) 673-3548
TO:
SOUTHWEST UTAH
***M EM OR AND U M***
Bryan Thiriot, Executive Director
FROM: Gary 0. Zabriskie, Director of Community and Economic Development
SUBJECT: Nomination to Governor Herbert for Utah Permanent Community ImpactFund Board
As per Utah Code Section 35A-8-304, which specifies the membership of the Utah PermanentCommunity Impact Fund Board, the Five County Association of Governments has a representativemember serving on that Board.
After nomination by the Steering Committee in 2012, Commissioner Denny Drake was appointedby Governor Herbert to serve a full four-year term on as the Five County Association ofGovernment’s representative on the Utah Permanent Community Impact Fund Board. Commissionerdrake was earlier appointed to fill the remaining portion of Maloy Dodd’s unexpired term.
Commissioner Drake has informed the Impact Fund Board staff that the April 3, 2014 Boardmeeting will be his last meeting. The Steering Committee needs to nominate and recommend to theGovernor a representative to serve on the Permanent Community Impact Board for the remainderof Commissioner Drake’s unexpired term which will expire at the end of June 2016.
Please ensure that this matter is placed on the agenda for Steering Committee action at their March12, 2014 meeting so that their nomination to the Governor may occur in a timely manner.
Attached is a copy of Section 35A-8-304 of the Utah Code.
BEAVER GARFIELD IRON KANE
DATE: March 4, 2014
WASHINGTON
61
AGENDA ITEM # VI. (Continued)
35A-8-304. Permanent Community Impact Fund Board created -- Members --
Terms -- Chair -- Expenses.
(1) There is created within the department the Permanent Community ImpactFund Board composed of 11 members as follows:
(a) the chair of the Board of Water Resources or the chair’s designee;(b) the chair of the Water Quality Board or the chair’s designee;(c) the director of the department or the director’s designee;(d) the state treasurer;(e) the chair of the Transportation Commission or the chair’s designee;(f) a locally elected official who resides in Carbon, Emery, Grand, or San Juan County;(g) a locally elected official who resides in Juab, Millard, Sanpete, Sevier, Piute, or
Wayne County;(h) a locally elected official who resides in Duchesne, Daggett, or Uintah County;(i) a locally elected official who resides in Beaver, Iron, Washington, Garfield, or
Kane County; and(j) a locally elected official from each of the two counties that produced the most mineral
lease money during the previous four-year period, prior to the term of appointment, asdetermined by the department.
(2) (a) The members specified under Subsections (1)(f) through (j) may not reside inthe same county and shall be:
(i) nominated by the Board of Directors of the Southeastern Association ofGovernments, Central Utah Association of Governments, Uintah Basin Association ofGovernments, and Southwestern Association of Governments, respectively, except that amember under Subsection (l)(j) shall be nominated by the Board of Directors of the Associationof Governments from the region of the state in which the county is located; and
(ii) appointed by the governor with the consent of the Senate.(b) Except as required by Subsection (2)(c), as terms of current board members expire,
the governor shall appoint each new member or reappointed member to a four-year term.(c) Notwithstanding the requirements of Subsection (2)(b), the governor shall, at the time
of appointment or reappointment, adjust the length of terms to ensure that the terms of boardmembers are staggered so that approximately half of the board is appointed every two years.
(d) When a vacancy occurs in the membership for any reason, the replacement shallbe appointed for the unexpired term.
(3) The terms of office for the members of the impact board specified under Subsections(I )(a) through (1 )(e) shall run concurrently with the terms of office for the councils, boards,committees, commission, departments, or offices from which the members come.
(4) The executive director of the department, or the executive director’s designee, is thechair of the impact board.
(5) A member may not receive compensation or benefits for the member’s service, butmay receive per diem and travel expenses in accordance with:
(a) Section 63A-3-106;(b) Section 63A-3-l07; and(c) rules made by the Division of Finance pursuant to Sections 63A-3-106 and
63A-3- 107.Renumbered and Amended by chapter 212. 2012 General Session
62
A GENDA ITEM # X-A.
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATIONCAR1.OS M BRACFRAS P1Execuovc D,rec,o,
SHAWL M MARSHALL P1;.)epi,n J)uec (or
State of Utah
GARYR HFRIWR1Gurernor
February2, 2014SPI•NC1:R .i cox
Lieuieswnt Governor
T0 Washington County Commissioners. Mayors of Cities within Washington CountyUtah Transportation CommissionUDOT Region DirectorsMetropolitan Planning Organizations
SUBJECT. Annual Visits to Counties, including County and City Officials and Other Transportation-Related Persons
The time and place for the Utah Department of Transportation s meeting with WashingtonCounty and cities within Washington County is as follows.
Wednesda., March 19, 2014, 9am - 11amCounty Admin. Building Commission Chambers, 197 East Tabernacle, St. Georc
We encourage attendance and representation from elected officials and staff personnel involvedin transportation planning, design, construction, and maintenance. Please invite those you would like toattend this meeting.
At this meeting, we will discuss and answer questions about federal aid transportation fundingand programs of interest to local governments. Also, your UDOT Region Representative will be inattendance to discuss upcoming state highway projects and to seek your input on better coordinationbetween UDOT and local governments. New developments in many other areas will also be discussedthat will help municipalities maximize the State and Federai transportation finding received.
If you have specific items or questions that you would like discussed please contact UDOT priorto the Annual Visit. Again, please note the date and time for your area listed above. The schedule is alsoincluded on the UDOT Local Government website at hjp:’www.udot.utah.gov.localgovemment.
If you have any questions or comments about these visits, please contact Chris Potter, UDOTLocal Government Programs Engineer at cpottei4iaii4o i 801) 633-6255
Sincerely.
Chris Potter, P E.Local Government Programs Engineer
CP.’jh
Program Development . Telephone 801 965-4129 Facsimile 80I 965-455i www udot,utah.govL au •n Rampton Complex 450 South 270(i West Mailing ddress. P0 Box 43600 Salt Lake City L tah 84! 4-360
63
-U 0 S m (0 S 0 0 0 C (0 0
MC
0 cg
G)
CO
D031C
Dm r
-‘
ff0 C
D
-4 -I m Cl) z 0 0 C z -I m Cl)
‘1 0 .0 C C S C 0 9 S S 0 0 0 C S.
0 S.
0.
C 0 0 C S C,
S.
S.
-U C 0 C Q 0 -4 r 0 0
-4 S U
S S 0.
0 C, S > S (0 C) 3 a 0 C) 3: C),
I.CD S (0 C, S. C) a 0)
H
0 C) a 3 3 C) 3 z a z
C, S C) C) a S C) z 0 a
0 C) c) a C) C) 0 3 3 0 C) 3 2 S S
C C, S SC a 0 a a C) 3 z a CS
S S C, C, C CC S a
C 8 C z m 0 z
SC S C 0 CC C) S a
0
1 a 2
•R
ET
IRE
ME
NT
LU
NC
HE
ON
!A
fter
six
yea
rsof
serv
ice
the
long
est
serv
ing
Monum
entM
anag
erE
VE
Rat
Gra
nd
Sta
irca
se-E
scal
ante
Nat
iona
lM
onum
ent
Ren
eB
erk
ho
ud
tha
sde
cide
dto
reti
re.
Loc
atio
n:P
arry
’sL
odge
89E
ast
Cen
ter
Str
eet
Kan
ab,
UT
8474
1D
ate:
Mar
ch20
,20
14T
ime:
11:3
0AM
Mai
nO
ptio
ns:
Tur
key
Roa
st,
Pot
Roa
st,
orC
hick
enF
ried
Ste
ak,
serv
edw
ith
mas
hpo
tato
esan
dgr
avy,
vegg
ies,
sala
d,an
dde
sser
t.
Com
ece
lebr
ate
inR
ene’
sho
nor
wit
hhi
sfa
mil
y,fr
iend
s,co
llea
gues
and
rem
inis
ceab
out
Ren
e’s
care
eran
dw
ish
him
and
his
fam
ily
all
the
best
asth
eym
ove
into
the
next
phas
eof
thei
rli
ves.
..R
ET
IRE
ME
NT
!
Let
uskn
oww
hich
entr
éeyo
uw
ant
soP
arry
’sL
odge
can
get
cook
ing:
Tur
key
Roa
st,
Pot
Roa
st,
orC
hick
enF
ried
Ste
ak.
RS
VP
byM
arch
13,
2014
toT
alis
hia
Tra
ni
(435
)644
-120
0or
ttra
ni(
b1m
.gov
A
Lun
chpe
rpe
rson
:$9
.99,
not
incl
udin
gta
xan
dgr
atui
ty.
AGENDA ITEM #X-B
Memorandum
To:i’ Bryan Thiriot. Executive Director
From: Carrie Schoniaw, SS’
Director of Aging & Human Services
Date: 2/27/20 14
Re: Steering Committee approval to reimburse travel expenses for County Council on Aging
Coordinators
I mu requesting approval from the Steering Committee to reimburse up to $500 per county to coverregistration and partial travel expenses for each of the County Council on Aging Coordinator in theFive County area to attend the National Association of Nutrition and Aging Service ProvidersConference in San Antonio Texas May 2830th We currently have some additional funding in ourArea Agency Administration budget to cover these costs.
This is an excellent conference which will provide valuable information, training and resources tohelp enhance and improve services to seniors in our local communities. I regret that I am not able toattend due to other obligations; but feel this is an excellent opportunity for the county coordinators.Breakout sessions include topics on: integrating services to better connect seniors to resources,Public/Private Partnerships, dietary guidelines, calculating meal costs and self-assessment tools, grantwriting and much more. There is also a free pre-conference intensive specifically for Nutrition andSenior Center Directors. A copy of the conference flyer is attached.
At this time, 2 of the 5 County Council on Aging Coordinators have received approval from theirCounty Commissioner(s) to attend the conference. The $500 would cover the cost of the registrationand alleviate some of the travel expenses for the individual counties. In addition, because FiveCounty is a member of NANASP we are able to receive a reduced conference rate for eachparticipant.
1 hunks for your consideration!
66
AGENDA ITEM # X-B. (Continued)
2014 Annual Training Conference
May 28-30, 2014 I San Antonio, TXwww.nanasp.org
Hotel Information
The Westin Riverwalk420 West Market Street San Antonio, TX 78205
210-224-6500 888-627-8396www.westinriverwalksanantonio.com
For reservations, contact the Westin Riverwalk Hotel at888-627-8396. Be sure to mention that you are withthe NANASP Conference to receive the special rate of$159.00 per night plus tax for single/double occupancy.
Registration Fees
$299 for Members/$399 for Non MembersSend 2, Get the 3rd One Free!
Registration Deadline: May 15, 2014
A limited number of scholarship are available, for moreinformation visit www.nanasp.org
Star Awards Nominations
Give your colleagues and/or your agency’s newprogram innovation the recognition they deserve --
nominate them for a NANASP Star Award (or RisingStar or Shining Star Award to be recognized at theAnnual Conference . Please contact Pam Carlson [email protected] for a nomination form.
2014 Schedule of Events
Wednesday, May 28, 2014
8:00-1:00 Directors Training Pre-Session10:00-1:00 Alicia Trevino SeniorOne Stop Center Site Tour
3:00-4:15 OpeningKickOff!Washington UpdateRobert Blancato,NANASF Executive Director
4:30-5:30 Concurrent Breakout Sessions5:30-7:00 Opening Reception/Star Awards
Thursday, May 29, 2014
8:00-9:00 Vendor BrealcfastfRoundtables
9:15-10:30 Keynote AddressKathy Green1ee, Administrationfor Community Liiing andAssistant Secretary forAging
11:00-12:15 ConcurrentBreakout Sessions12:15-1:30 Vendor Lunch1:45-5:15 Concurrent Breakout Sessions
Friday, May 30, 2014
8:30-9:30 Senior Centers as Part of the HealthCare Delivery System General Session9:45-11:30 Best Practices ShowcasefNANASPAnnual MeetingfBrunch
Session Topics
Integrating Services in Nutrition Programs to BetterConnect Seniors to Resources • Arts and Aging in anUrban Context • Public/Private Partnerships • Update onthe New Dietary Guidelines • Calculating the True Costof a Meal • Collecting and Using Nutrition Program DataEffectively • Senior Center Self Assessment Tools •Effectively using Social Media to Increase ROl •Opportunities in Grant Writing and more!
For more information, visit www.nanasp.orgor call 202.682.6899
67
AGENDA ITEM # X-B. (Continued)
FIVE COUNTY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTSOUT OF STATE TRAVEL AUTHORIZATION REQUEST
Employee Name: Doni Pack Date: 2/13/2014
Pursuant to the Five County Association of Governments personnel policies and
procedures, I am requesting authorization to travel out of state for the following purposes:
PURPOSE OF TRAVEL:Mutual Self-Help Program required USDA Section 502 Loan Packaging Certification. This
certification is required in order to process applications for the Mutual Self-Help Program. The
certification course is offered approximately quarterly, with the next training being held March
25-27, 2014. Travel will need to be on March 24th and March 28th as the training is a full three
days. The location is Memphis, TN at The Hotel Memphis.
PLEASE ATTACH SUPPORTING DOCUMENTION
Estimated Travel Costs:
Airfare/Surface Transportation (approx.) $897.50
Lodging 4 Nights (i $99.00 $396.00
Per Diem 5 Days $35.00 $175.00
Registration Fees 3 Days $400.00
Other Costs: $88.16
Explanation of other costs:
Hotel fees and taxes: $ 63.16, State Travel Fee $25
TOTAL ESTiMATED TRAVEL COSTS: : $1,956.66
Source of travel funds: Mutual Self-Help Program Training/Travel Funds
Budget line item: 44
CFOSignature: Date:
__________
Executive Director Signature: Date: 12 Qb I 9
68
AGENDA ITEM # X-B. (Continued)
USDA SECTION 502 TRAININGMEMPHIS, TN
MARCH 25-27, 2014
AGENDA
8:30 AM We come
10:00 Overview of 502 Mortgage
10:40 Intake and Application Processing
11:30 Lunch (on your own(
1:00 PM Overview (Jeopardy(
1:45 Borrower EIigbilty: Annual income and Adjusted Income
3:00 Intake Scenarios
3:25 Repayment Income
4:00 Homework - Adjourn
8:30 AM Overview of Day 1 and Homework Review
9:00 Borrower Assets
9:15 Borrower Credit
10:1S Credit Exercises and Review
11:00 Repayment Ability
11:30 Lunch (on yojr own)
1:00 PM Repayment Exercise/Loan Package througn Stage 1— Preliminary Eligibility
2:45 Loan Package Stage 1 Review
3:15 Subsidy Recapture
3:30 Interactive Review
4:00 PM Adjourn
8:30 AM Review of Day 2
8:45 Property Requirements
9:30 Loan Packaging- Stage 2
10:15 Submittng the Loan Docket
11:30 Escrow Accounts, Insurance and Closing
12:00 PM Lunch (on your own(
1:00 Loan Packaging - Stage 3
1:30 Practce Test and Review
3:15 Next Steps Questions and Evaluation
‘-:00 PM Aoiourn
Houxing Assistace Council 69
