FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.Dec 27, 2005 · William Chappell FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO 129 LOCKWOOD ST Newark, NJ 07105 Re: 5G2 .General Permit Stormwater Basic NJ0088315 NJPDES:

SDMS Document

93211

PRP CASES FOR THELOWER PASSAIC RIVER

STUDY AREA

PRP DATA EXTRACTION FORMS AND EVIDENCE CONCERNING:

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.

PREPARED FOR:

LOWER PASSAIC RIVER STUDY AREACOOPERATING PARTIES GROUP

SUBMITTED TO:USEPA REGION II

DECEMBER 27, 2005

932110001

fl

932110002

PRP CASES

FOR THE

LOWER PASSAIC RIVER STUDY AREA

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.

INDEX OF EVIDENCE

Tab No. Year Day andMonth

Description

1

2

34

67

89

10

11.1213

; 1995-: 2005

2002! '

! 1999' 2000

; 1999

3-Oct

10-Dec5-Jan

19-Nov

i 2000 28-Jun.. 1978 September

• : 2005l| 2005

'.'. 2003

UndatedVarious

1973

7-Dec7-Dec

14-Oct

NJDEP Waste Manifest Report

Renewal Authorization to Discharge Stormwater underNJPDES General Permit NJ0088315Request for Authorization Form (RFA)Authorization to Discharge Stormwater under NJPDES GeneralPermit No. NJ0088315Letter from NJDEP to Fiske Brothers regarding failure tosubmit a Discharge to Surface Water permit applicationStormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) CertificationCity of Newark, New Jersey Feasibility Study: PollutionAbatement ProgramD&B Report on Fiske Brothers Refining Co.New Jersey Trade and Manufacturer's Catalogs showingLubriplate as a division of Fiske Brothers from 1950-1960World Wide Web article, "Success Stories: Fiske BrothersRefining Co."Lubriplate Lubrication Date BookMSDSs for Fiske Brothers ProductsAnnual Report to the Passaic Valley Sewerage Commision

12/27/2005

932110003

932110004

HWR163105/23/05

NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTIONDIVISION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

WASTE MANIFESTS FROM 01/01/95 TO 05/23/05FROM GENERATOR NJD00215307Q TO SPECIFIED TSDF' S

PAGE

GENERATOR TSDFDATE WASTE

MANIFEST SHIPPED CODE WASTE NAME QUANTITY

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.129 LOCKWOOD ST.NEWARK , NJNJD002153070

CYCLE CHEM INC217 S FIRST STELIZABETHNJD00220004S

NJNJA3083395 01/19/00 D002 CHARACTERISTIC OF CORROSIVITY

F003 NON HAL SOLV & STLBTM2000 P

60 G

NJA3083400 01/19/00 D002 CHARACTERISTIC OF CORROSIVITYD001 CHARACTERISTIC OF IGNITABILITY

110 G55 G

COto

oooOl

HWR1S31 NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PAGE05/23/05 DIVISION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

WASTE MANIFESTS FROM 01/01/80 TO 12/31/94FROM GENERATOR NJD002153070 TO SPECIFIED TSDF' S

DATE WASTEGENERATOR TSDF MANIFEST SHIPPED CODE WASTE NAME QUANTITY

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO." " CITY DISPOSAL/ENVIRONMENTAL129 LOCKWOOD ST. 1550 HARPERNEWARK , NJ DETROIT , MINJD002153070 NJC876005257 MI01693100 08/14/90 X725 OIL SPILL CLEANUP MATERIAL 57450 P

MI01703727 09/18/90 X725 OIL SPILL CLEANUP MATERIAL 11500 P

COto

OoOo>

F J K 0 0 0 0 0 2

932110007

932110008

James E. McGreevey Department of Environmental Protection Bradley M. CampbellGovernor Commissioner

Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlDivision of Water Quality

P.O. Box 029 Trenton, NJ 08625-0029Phone : 609-633-7021, 292-0407

Fax: 609-984-2147

10/02/2002

William ChappellFISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO129 LOCKWOOD ST

Newark, NJ 07105

Re: 5G2 .General Permit Stormwater Basic NJ0088315NJPDES: NJG0135992 PI ID #: 50467FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CONewark, Essex

Dear William Chappell:

Your facility is currendy authorized to discharge stormwater under General Permit NJPDES No. NJ0088315.The version of die general permit under which you previously were authorized has expired. However, thispermit hasibeen renewed until May 31, 2007. Please find enclosed your Renewal Authorization toDischarge Stormwater under NJPDES General Permit NJ0088315 and a copy of that permit. All co-permittees'will receive original Authorizations. One of these Authorization forms is requested to beLOCATED at the regulated facility at all times and be AVAILABLE for inspection by any authorizedrepresentative of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. If you have designated anagent, it is your responsibility to notify your agent about this General Permit Authorization and itsrequirements.

Enclosed is^he final General Permit NJ0088315. Please be advised that the renewed General Permitrequires that all stormwater associated with industrial activities, including that discharged to groundwater.must meet the Best Management Practice of no exposure. You were advised of this new condition in thedraft permit information you received as part of the permit renewal process. Please submit yourcertification, as described below, prior to the required deadline.

Also enclosed is an ATTACHMENT D Annual Recertification that must be submitted to the Bureau eachyear. You are required to annually review your facility and submit a certification attesting that the facilitymeets all the requirements of the permit. This form will be due in the calendar quarter in which the monthof Attachment D - SPPP Initial Implementation and Inspection Certification falls. The due date will be athree month quarter as assigned on your authorization page (see "Annual Recertification Due" on yourAuthorization page).

: New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer * vj 1 . VJ w w; I Recycled Paper

Copies of the revised SPPP Guidance Manual and other forms including the Annual RecertificationAttachment D, will available at the Department's web site: http: / / www.state.ni. us /dep /dwq/stormw.htm.If you do not have access to the web site please contact the Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control at theabove address for a copy.

Should any information about your facility, i.e., mailing address, contact person, etc. change, pleasecontact the Bureau for a Administrative Update Form. If your facility is sold, closing or moving itslocation please write the Bureau for instructions.

The Department appreciates your efforts toward accomplishing the goal of providing cleaner water for ourState and looks forward to working together with you in the future. If you have any questions pleasecontact the Bureau.

Sincerely,

— n

Barry Chalofsky, P.P., ChiefBureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

Enclosures: (2)Renewed Authorization to Discharge (ATD)NJPDES General Permit No. NJ0088315

C: (w/ATD Form): NJDEP Water Compliance and Enforcement Region OfficeFacility Owner (if applicable)Debbie. Esposti, BPM

932110009 FJK000004

New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionBureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlDivision of Water QualityPO Box 029Trenton, NJ 08625-0029Phone: (609) 633-7021Fax: (609) 984-2147

RENEWAL OF AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGE5G2 -General Permit Stormwater Basic

Facility Name:

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO

PI ID #: 50467

Facility Address:129 LOCKWOODSTNEWARK, NJ 07105

SIC Code: 2992

NJPDES#: NJG0135992

Annual Recertification Due: Jan - Mar

Type of Activity: Stormwater Discharge General Permit Authorization RenewalOwner:FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO129 LOCKWOODSTNEWARK, NJ 07105

Operating Entity:FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO129 LOCKWOODSTNEWARK, NJ 07105

Issuance Date:10/03/2002

Effective Date:06/01/2002

Expiration Date:05/31/2007

Your Request for Authorization under NJPDES General Permit No. NJ0088315 hasbeen approved by the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.

Date: 10/03/2002

Barry Ghalofsky, P.P., ChiefBureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlDivision of Water QualityNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

FJKQ00005

932110010

New Jersey Department of Environmental ProtectionBureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

PO Box 029Trenton, N.J. 08625-0029

ATTACHMENT "D"brmwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP|

Initial Implementation and Inspection Certification"Basic Industrial General Permit No. NJ0088315

(N.J.A.C. 7:14A-11 Appendix A) ;12

SWG- A- 021737 • "' ^ ' NJPDES Permit#

SUBMITiTHIS FORM ONCE. AFTER SPPP IS IMPLEMENTED. FOR EXISTING FACILITIES,THE SPPP MUST BE IMPLEMENTED WITHIN 18 MONTHS OF AUTHORIZATION UNLESSTHE DEPARTMENT GRANTS AN EXTENSION.

"I certify under penalty of law that this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Implementation andInspection Certification and all attached documents were prepared under my direction or supervisionin 'accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properly gather and evaluatethis information. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who manage the system, or thosepersons directly responsible for gathering this information, the information in this StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan Implementation and Inspection Certification and all attached documents is,to the best of myknowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete.

"I certify that the facility .has been inspected to identify areas contributing to the Stormwaterdischarge authorized under NJPDES permit No. NJ0088315 and to evaluate whether the Stormwaterpollution prevention plan (SPPP) prepared under that permit complies with part JH.A. of that permitand is being properly implemented.

"I certify that the Stormwater pollution prevention plan referred to in this Stormwater PollutionPrevention Plan Implementation and Inspection Certification has been and will continue to be fullyimplemented at this facility in accordance with the terms and conditions of part UJ of NJPDES PermitNo. NJ0088315. I specifically certify that there is no exposure, during and after storm events, ofindustrial: materials, machinery, waste products or other source materials located at the facility, toStormwater that is discharged to surface waters and regulated under that NJPDES permit "(except forany incidents of non-compliance identified in the attached report). I also specifically certify that thisfacility dcjes not generate and discharge, through storm sewers to surface waters, any domesticsewage, non-contact cooling water, or process waste water (including leachate and contact coolingwater) other than Stormwater, unless that discharge is authorized by another NJPDES permit oridentifiedjin an application (o request for authorization) submitted for another NJPDES permit.

"I also certify that this facility is not in violation of any conditions of NJPDES Permit No.NJ0088315, including requirements in part HI of that permit for preparation ana implementation of aStormwater pollution prevention plan, except for any incidents of noncompliance (which are noted inthe attached report). For any incidents of noncompliance identified in the annual inspection (or madeknown to me during the course of the past year), I have attached a report identifying these

932110011 F JK000006

N.J.D.E.P. Bureau ot Nonpoint Pollution Oontrol

ANNUAL REPORT

Worksheet #13Completed by: William H. Chappell

Title: Chief Lubrication Fngineer

Date: June 29, 2001

Instruction^: Summarize each annual inspection. Indicate whether the facility was in compliance with the SPPP andthe conditions of this permit. In the case of noncompliance the report shall identify measures taken to remedy anynoncompliance. This report must be signed and dated and kept with SPPP for five years.

We have conducted an annual inspection evaluating all areas that dischargestormwater authorized by this permit, including:

',: » the removal or covering of source material;;. * areas where good housekeeping practices are used;' • activities for preventive maintenance;

• visual inspections for sources of pollution;• structures for diverting stormwater; and© training for stormwater pollution prevention team members.

Our; facility has maintained each of the BMPs outlined in the SPPP. We havemade necessary repairs or maintenance as needed. We will pursue moretraining for stormwater pollution prevention awareness by seeking seminarsconcerning said stormwater pollution prevention and permitting. The annualinspection determined that the SPPP has been properly implemented, and haseliminated exposure of source material to stormwater, and that no additionalmeasures are required. Therefore, Fiske Brothers Refining Co. is incompliance with the SPPP and the conditions of the Basic IndustrialStormwater General Permit (NJ0088315)

F J K 0 0 0 0 0 7

Signature Date

932110012

932110013

932110014

I -3 1939Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

Division of Water QualityNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

FOR STATE USE ONLYSWGA* /?-&*/73 /NJPDES #Date Rec'd ''*-'Z.1-WAmount Rec'd $

Check Rec'dA/A Rec'dSPPP Rec'dCert.Staff

Request for Authorization (RFA) FormNJPDES Basic Industrial Stormwater General Permit No. NJ0088315

(N.J.A.C. 7:14A-11 Appendix A)Stormwater Discharge Associated with Industrial Activity

Please read and follow all the instructions carefully (see attached instructions). Any omissions may delay your permit autho-rization issuance. Sign and Date where indicated. Print or Type all information.

1. Facility InformationFiske Brothers Refininq. CorcvoanvA. Facility Name

B. Location (number and street) _

C. City or Town Newark

129 Lockwood Street

D. County

E. USEPA ID # (if assigned) NJD-002153070

F. Mailing Address 129 Lockw°°d Street

G. City or Town_ Newark

H. State & Zip Code New Jersey 07105-4782

I. SIC Code & Short Title 2992 Petroleum Products-Lubricating Oils & Greases

J. Contact Person & Telephone Number William Chapnell

K. Parent Company Fiske Bros. Refining Co. Telephone # (573 ) 589-9150

Mailing Address 129 Lockwood Street )

City or Town Newark, ""." „ a _ _ ', ;

State New Jersey Zip Code 07105-4782

2. Property Owner (land)

A. Name i Fiske Brothers Refining Co.

B. Permanent Legal Address 129 Lockwood Street

C. City or Town Newark

E. Taxpayer Identification # or Social Security #

D. State & Zip Code HJ 0710522-0913895

^ ,.- ^^^

F. Owner Status (circle) 1. govemmen^2^commerciap 3. religious 4. charitable 5. public school

G. Telephone Number (97^ 589-9150

F J K Q 0 0 0 0 8

RFA Certification

Attachment "A"Basic Industrial Stormwater General Permit

NJPDES General Permit No. NJ0088315

"I certify under penalty of law that this Request for Authorization and all attached documents were preparedunder my direction or supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnelproperly gather and evaluate the information submitted. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons whomanage the system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering the information, the informationsubmitted is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true, accurate and complete. As far as I know, none of thestormwater discharges for which this Request for Authorization is submitted are excluded from authorizationby part I.B of NJPDES Permit No. NJ0088315.

"I am aware that pursuant to the Water Pollution Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., there aresignificant civil;and criminal penalties for making a false statement, representation or certification in anyapplication, record, or other document filed or required to be maintained under that Act, including fines and/orimprisonment."

WHO MUST SIGN?

FOR A CORPORATION: a "responsible corporate officer" or dulv authorized representative. A "responsible corporateofficer" is (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corporation in charge of a principal business function,or any other person who performs similar policy or decision-making functions for the corporation; or (ii) the manager of oneor more manufacturing, production, or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales orexpenditures exceeding S25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents has been assigned ordelegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.

FOR A PARTNERSHIP OR SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP: a general partner or the proprietor, respectively, or Julvauthorized representative.

FOR A MUNICIPALITY, STATE, FEDERAL OR OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY: either a principal executive officer orranking elected official, or dulv authorized representative .

A "responsible corporate officer", general partner, proprietor, principal executive officer of a public agency, or rankingelected official may assign his or her signatory authority for this Certification to a dulv authorized representative , which isa named person or generic position (e.g., plant manager, superintendent, plant engineer, operations manager, etc.) havingoverall responsibility for facility operation or the permittee's environmental matters, by submitting a letter to the Bureau ofPermit Management stating sail) authority and naming the person or position.

FacHity Name: Fiske Brothers Refining Company(pniU)

(pnnu il applicable, name ofcorporauon, partnership, or public agency submitting mis cerufication)

Richard T. McCluskey

(signature) (print name)

President & CEO December 10, 1999

(title) (date)

3

932110015 F J K 0 0 0 0 0 9

932110016

ELIZABETH QUADRANGLENEW JERSEY-NEW YORK

7.5-MINUTE SERIES (TOPOGRAPHIC)! '72 I 180 000 METERS (NJ) '73 74°07i'30"

' ;40°45'

932110017

Christine Todd WhitmanGovernor

Department of Environmental Protection

To:

Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control401 East State Street

P.O. Box 029Trenton, NJ 08625-0029

Tel. 609-633-7021 Fax 609-984-2147

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANY

Robert C. Shinn, Jr.Commissioner

1/5/00

Please find enclosed your Authorization to Discharge Stonnwater under NJPDES General Permit N NJ00383 15and a copy of that permit All co-permittees will receive original Authorizations. One of these Authorizationforms is requested to be LOCATED at the regulated facility at all times and be AVAILABLE for inspection byany authorized representative of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection. If you have designatedan agent, it is your responsibility to notify your agent about this General Permit Authorization and itsrequirements.Enclosed are your Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SPPP) Certifications (Attachments C and D )and your SPPP Guidance Manual. Below is a brief description of each:

The SPPP GUIDANCE MANUAL is a planning aid for use in developing your Stormwater Pollution PreventionPlan.

ATTACHMENT C (SPPP Preparation Certification) certifies that the Plan has been prepared in accordancewith the permit The permit specifies that this Certification must be signed and submitted to the Bureau ofNonpoint Pollution Control (Bureau) six (6) months from the date of this letter.

ATTACHMENT D (SPPP Initial Implementation and Inspection Certification) certifies that the Plan has beenimplemented and that you have inspected the facility for compliance with the Plan and the permit. The permitspecifies .that this Certification must be signed and submitted to the Bureau within eighteen (1 8) months

from me date of this letter. (You will later receive ATTACHMENT D Annual Recertifications that must besubmitted to the Bureau in subsequent years.)

Should any information about your facility, i.e., mailing address, contact person, etc. change, please contact theBureau for a Standard Change Form. If your facility is sold, closing or moving if s location, please write theBureau for instructions.

The Department appreciates your efforts toward accomplishing the goal of providing cleaner water for our Stateand looks forward to working together with you in the future. If you have any questions please contact theBureau,

Sincerely,

Enclosures: (5)Authorization to Discharge (ATD) FormNJPDES .General Permit NONJ0088315Attachments C and DSPPP Guidance Manual

Barry Chalofsky, P.P., ChiefBureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control

c (w/ATD Form): NJDEP Water Complianceand Enforcement Region Office

. Facility Owner (if applicable)BPM

1 i( f } f| Q Q 1 \' w ^ ^

New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer

Recycled Paper

932110018


Division of Water Quality401 East State Street

P.O. Box 029Trenton, NJ 08625-0029

Tel. 609-633-7021 or 292-0407

AUTHORIZATION TO DISCHARGESTORMWATER TO SURFACE WATER

Facility Name FISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANY

Facility Address 129 LOCKWOOD STREET

NEWARK, NJ

SIC Code: 2992

Type of Industrial Activity LUBRICATING OILS AND GREA

OwnerName: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.

129 LOCKWOOD STREET

NEWARK, NJ 07105

SWG A-021737

NJ0135992

Operator

FISKE BROTHERS REFININGCOMPANY

129 LOCKWOOD STREET

NEWARK, NJ 07105

EFFECTIVE DATE 1/5/00 EXPIRATION DATE: 1/31/02

Your Request for Authorization under NJPDES General Permit N< NJ0088315 has beenapproved by the NewJersey Department of Environmental Protection.

\Barry Chalofsky, P.P., ChiefBureau of Nonpoint Pollution ControlNew Jersey Department of Environmental Protection

Date: 1/5/00

FJK000012

932110019

932110020

Chris t ine Tocid Whi tman Department of Environmental Protection Robert C. Shinn, jr.Govcrjlor Nortkern Bureau of Water Compliance and Enforcement , Commissioner

1259 Route 46, Building 2 /jj ^A//^Patsippany, New Jersey 07054-4191 / /'?

TelepWe (973) 299-7592'Fax (973) 299-7719 '

November 19, 1999

CERTIFIED MAIL XTRETURN RECEIPT REQUESTED w^ )°l

\\ I

Mr. William Chappell, Chief Lubricating Engineer ^ \iFiske Brothers Refinery company 9 f '129Lockwood St. . ffNewark, NX 07105 ^

Re: Unpermitted Discharge to Surface Water (Passaic River)Fiske Brothers Refinery CompanyNewark/Essex County

Dear Mr. Chappell: .

A representative of the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection ("NJDEP" or"Department") conducted a New Jersey Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NJPDES)Compliance Evaluation and Assistance Inspection at the Fiske Brothers Refinery Company(Fiske) industrial facility at 129 Lockwood Street, Newark, New Jersey 07105 on November15 and 16, 1999.

A Notice of Violation (NOV) was issued to Fiske for the following violation:

The facility has not submitted a Discharge to Surface Water (DSW) permit application to theBureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control (BNPC) as required under the Industrial GeneralStormwater Permitting Program.

You are required to take corrective measures. Fiske's industrial activity is in the proximityof storm drains discharging to the Passaic River. Such a discharge is governed by the New JerseyWater Pollution Control ActN.J.S.A.58:10A-l etseq., and the regulations promulgatedthereunder N.J.A.C.7:14A-11 et seq. Your facility, with SIC Code 2992, should be regulatedunder category (ii) of the General Stormwater Permit.

F J K 0 0 0 0 1 3

932110021New Jersey is an Equal Opportunity Employer

Ri'cvcled Paper

-2-

You are therefore required to submit, an application for the General Stormwater Permitpursuant to N.J.A.C.7:14A-11.5(b) as defined under N.J.A.C.7:14A-1.2 to the Bureau ofNon- )Point Pollution Control, 401 East State Street, Trenton, New Jersey 08625, with a copy sent tothis Bureau, within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Permit applicationinformation and forms may be obtained by contacting the Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Controlat (609) 633-7021.

Please direct any questions on this correspondence to this writer by phone at (973) 299-7592,or by letter through this Bureau. Thank you for your continued cooperation in the prevention andcontrol of water pollution in New Jersey.

932110023


PO Box 029Trenton, N.J. 08625-0029

ATTACHMENT "C"Stormwater Pollution Prevention

Plan (SPPP) CertificationBasic industrial General Permit No. NJ0088315-

(N.J.A.C. 7:14A-11 Appendix A)

SWG: A- 021737 NJPDES Permit #. NJ. ..01359-92

THIS CERTIFICATION FORM IS TO BE SUBMITTED AFTER YOU HAVE PRE?A_FACILITY'S SPPP. FOR EXISTING FACILITIES, THE SPPP MUST BE PREPARED WITHIN'^MONTHS OF THE GENERAL PERMIT AUTHORIZATION. THIS ATTACHMENT "C" CERTI-FIES THAT THE SPPP HAS BEEN PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE GENERAL PER-MIT CONDITIONS.

"I certify under penalty of law that I have signed a stormwater pollution prevention plan(SPPP), and that if this plan is fully implemented, there will be no exposure, during and afterstorm events, of industrial materials, machinery, waste products or other source materials locatedat the facility, to stormwater that is discharged to surface waters and regulated under NJPDESPermit No. NJ0088315 (except for unintentional and temporary exposure because of an eventbeyond the reasonable control of the permittee). I further certify that if any part of this stormwaterpollution prevention plan requires the consent of the owner(s) of or another operating entity forthe facility, that consent has been obtained. - .

"I further certify that this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Preparation Certification, allattached documents, and stormwater pollution prevention plan were prepared under my directionor supervision in accordance with a system designed to assure that qualified personnel properlygather andtevaluate this information. Based on my inquiry of the person or persons who managethe system, or those persons directly responsible for gathering this information, the informationin this Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan Preparation Certification, all attached documents,and stormwater pollution prevention plan is, to the best of my knowledge and belief, true,accurate and complete.

"I certify that the stormwater pollution prevention plan referred to in this StormwaterPollution Prevention Plan Preparation Certification has been signed and is being retained at thefacility in accordance with part ELA of NJPDES Permit No. NJ0088315, and that the permitteeintends that this stormwater pollution prevention plan will be fully implemented at the facility inaccordance with the terms and conditions of that permit. I am aware that pursuant to the WaterPollution Control Act, N.J.S.A. 58:10A-1 et seq., there are significant civil and criminal penaltiesfor making a false statement, representation, or certification in any application, record, or otherdocument filed or required to be maintained under that Act, including fines and/or imprison-ment." _ _

" 932110024 ™» F J K 0 0 0 0 1 4

Any changes to the facility data previously submitted require a Standard ChangeForm (SCF) to be submitted along with this Certification. This will facilitate filemaintenance. Please contact the Bureau at (609) 633-7021 for copies of this form.Do not send the actual SPPP with this submission. The pian and a copy ofthis Certification are to remain on-site available for inspection.

•\VHD MUST SIGN?

FOR A CORPORATION: a "responsible corporate officer" or duly authorized representative. A"responsible corporate officer" is (i) a president, secretary, treasurer, or vice-president of the corpora-tion in charge of a principal business function, or any other person who performs similar policy ordecision-making functions for the corporation; or (ii) the manager of one or more manufacturing,production, or operating facilities employing more than 250 persons or having gross annual sales orexpenditures exceeding $25 million (in second-quarter 1980 dollars), if authority to sign documents hasbeen assigned or delegated to the manager in accordance with corporate procedures.

FOR A PARTNERSHIP OR SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP: a general partner or the proprietor, respec-tively, or duly authorized representative.

FOR A:MUNICIPALITY, STATE, FEDERAL OR OTHER PUBLIC AGENCY: either a principalexecutive officer or ranking elected official, or duly authorized representative.

A "responsible corporate officer", general partner, proprietor, principal executive officer of a publicagency, or ranking elected official may assign his or her signatory authority for this Certification to aduly authorized representative, which is a named person or generic position (e.g., plant manager.superintendent, plant engineer, operations manager, etc.) having overall responsibility for facilityoperation or the permittee's environmental matters, by submitting a letter to the Bureau of NonpointPollution Control stating said authority and naming the person or position.

Whenever there are two or more permittees for the facility, all of those permittees shall jointly submit thisCertification, unless permittees received authorization on different dates and this Certification istherefore due from them at different dates.

Facility Name: Fiske Brothers Refin.ina Co. SWG: A- 021737

;• NJPDES #. N;J- .0135992

Fiske''Brothers Refining Company(print, if applicable, name of corporation, partnership, or public agency submitting this Certification)

00 Richard T, M.cCluskev(date) (print name)

If you have any questions regarding this Attachment C or any other stormwater related ques-tions, please call a member of the Bureau of Nonpoint Pollution Control staff at (609) 633-7021.Attachment C shall be submitted to the letterhead address on the front of this Certification.

ATTC-5/5/97

932110025

7-^f

932110026

City of Newark, New Jersey

Feasibility Study

POLLUTION ABATEMENTPROGRAM

Clinton Bogert AssociatesConsulting Engineers

September, 1978Revised January, 1979

F J K 0 0 0 0 1 5932110027

COCOro

oorooo

LEGEND

— -o-- STpRM SCWEP

o INLET BASINS

IS-7 DRAINAGE STRUCTURE

C Ji RAILROAD DRAINAGE DITCH

Q • SOURCES Of POLLUTION

(~X- -. PIPtS Of UNKNOWN OfllGl*

. '- -• susftcito rJA)Hf>:*, OF K

BKWHHJUH1_

O©Q00©

O

©

©©00OO®000(3000

0

OCCASIONAL ovr;n/LO« or it"»c( fion »*JIIT»HTIO,HHDLtl 1HT1IIIHC 1 NtETI .

IHLITS »I»O DIU1NI »T tH«*«tH SHLI.DOUCO»rWt COMHICTtO TO ITOM« SEWtK.

1HOAD DMIH COHHCCT[0 TO KANHOLC

F J K O O Q Q 1 6

NEWARK POLLUTION ABATEMENTFEASIBILITY STUDY

SOURCES OF POLLUTION IN STORMSEWER SYSTEMS ON 8LANCHARO,LOCKWOOO AND BROWN STREETS

JJC^^ I—

VENUE_

PLANtoGOto

ooro

C 5 !MTOM PfJfSFPT A

Honorable Kennech A. Gibson, Mayor .CLk̂ J January 24, 1979City of Newark B'A^ Page

City Hall ~920 Broad StreetNewark, New Jersey 07102

We would be pleased to meet with you to review any m a t t e r s con-

I tained herein. We wish to express our appreciation of the assistancegiven us by members of your s t a f f , particularly Mr. R o b e r t B e n z , incarrying forward this work.

I Very truly yours,

CLINTON BOGERT ASSOCIATES

I

\

\

Herbert L. KaufmanP . E . , N.J. Lit. No. 13647

HLK:mmbEnclosure

F J K 0 0 0 0 1 9

932110031

Table of Contents

Page No.

Le t te r of Transraittal

I. In t roduc t ion 1

II. Scope of Work 3

III. Roanoke, Doremus, and Wilson Avenue Sewers 4A. Existing Sewers 4B. Physical Inspection Findings 5

1. Avenue "P" Regulator and RoanokeOut fall Sewer 5

2. Roanoke Avenue Sanitary Sewer 63. Doremus Avenue Interceptor 64. Wilson Avenue Interceptor 75 . Roanoke Avenue Regulator 7

C. Hydraulic Analysis 81. Flow Measurement Methods... 82. Observed Flow Rates 83. Diversion of Roanoke Flow to PVSC

Interceptor 104. Diversion Works 14

D. Conclusions and Recommendations 17

IV. Blanchard Street 20A. Physical Inspection Findings................20B. Dry Weather Sampling and Flow Rates 23C. Smoke Testing 24D. Television Inspection 25E. Conclusions and Recommendations.... 26

V. Lockwood Street Outfall 28A. Physical Inspection Findings 28

1. Lister Avenue Sewer 282. Morris Canal Sewers 293 . Eucl id Avenue Sewer 294. Albert Avenue Sewer •• ....305. Lockwood Street Sewer ..................306. Lister Avenue Tide Gate 307. Lockwood Street Outfall 31

B. Dry Weather Flow Sampling and FlowMonitoring .32

C. Smoke Testing 34D. Television Inspection...... 35E. Conclusions and Recommendations 38

(continued)

F J K 0 0 0 0 2 0932110032

I

Table of Contents( continued)

—

_

I

«1

J

Page No

VI. Brown Street ..................................... 41A. Configurat ion ............................... 41B. Physical Inspection Findings ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42C. Dry Weather E f f l u e n t Sampling ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 44D. Conclusions and Recommendations ............. 45

VII . General Recommendations ......................... 46VII I . Appendices Following Text

A. Analytical Test ResultsB. Letter From Robinson Pipe Cleaning

Company

I

1

I

I

ii

FJK000021

I 932110033

ILLUSTRATIONS(Following Appendices)

A. Plate 1 - Sanitary and Combined Sewer Configurations on Roanoke,Doretnus and Wilson Avenues

B. Plate 2 - Sources of Pollution in Storm Sewer Systems onBlanchard, Lockwood and Brown Streets

C. Plate 3 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Roanoke Avenue OutfallSewer

D. Plate 4 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Roanoke Avenue OutfallSewer

E. Plate 5 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Doremus AvenueInterceptor

F. Plate 6 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Doreraus AvenueInterceptor

G. Plate 7 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Wilson AvenueInterceptor

H. Plate 8 - Diurnal Sewage Flow Patterns, Wilson AvenueInterceptor

I. Plate 9 - Flow Rates at the Lister Avenue Tide Gate Chamber

F J K 0 0 0 0 2 2iii

932110034

IV. Blanchard Street

A. Physical Inspection Findings

Blanchard Street is served by separate storm and sanitary se-

wers. The 24-inch storm sewer (see Plate 2), const ructed in 1917,

discharges to the Passaic River . In 1970, the s to rm sewer was

extended and the sanitary sewer was rebuilt. The sanitary sewer con-

nects to a trunk sewer in Raymond Boulevard. The sanitary sewer is

clogged by grease, tallow, paper and black oily waste. Several san-

itary manholes were observed to surcharge and over f low into the

street. These overflows usually, occurred between 11:00 a.m. and 3:00

p.m. on weekdays. The frequency of overflow varies depending on in-

dustrial discharge rates. It does not appear to be related to rain-

fall events. Overflows were observed at least once a week and were

noted on ten consecutive weekdays in April 1978. Intermittent ' over-

flows may have occurred during the last few years. These sanitary

overflows, are a major source of pollutants in the Blanchard Street

storm sewer. City forces had been cleaning the Blanchard Street

sanitary sewer when backups and overflows- were reported. Equipment

breakdowns and manpower shortages caused a suspension of cleaning

operations in 1978.

Prior to cleaning, the storm sewer contained between 1.0 and 1.5

feet of primarily granular sediment mixed with black oil. The oil,

which comes from the overflowing sanitary sewer, coats the inside of

the pipes land manholes. Several inlets were filled with debris and

sediment. ' The tide gate is mounted on a headwall on the ri"er bank.

The gate was being held open by sediment and debris during the f i r s t

field inspection. The gate appeared to be fully operational af ter

City personnel removed' the sediment in April 1978. In subsequent

inspections floating debris had lodged again under the gate indi-

cating the need for f requent maintenance. A con t inuous was te

20 FJK000022a

932110035

discharge was noted. Dry weather flow rates, varying between 10,000

gpd and 100,000 gpd were estimated using depth m e a s u r e m e n t s . The

source of this flow appears to be groundwater. Dry weather f l o w was

observed above manhole B-7 only when the sani tary sewer was . over-

flowing or 'the drainage ditches along the Conrail industr ia l spurs

were flooded.

Inlets B-106, B-107, B-108, B-109, B-110 and B-lll receive f low

from the railroad spurs and sidings. The ditches along these tracks

drain wet lands which were observed to contribute continuous flow for

up to two weeks during wet periods. Chemical spillage was observed

on the tracks and in the adjacent ditches. The source of the chem-

icals appears to be leakage from railroad tank cars. No leaking cars

were observed, however. Major spills were noted f r o m the Atlas

Refinery Inc. railroad siding. Rain washes some of this spillage

through the drainage ditches and railroad ballast into the 'Blanchard

Street storm inlets. Since no leaking cars were found on the Conrail

spurs, it is .not possible to link other specif ic industries to the

spillage. Valves may not always be closed when the cars are unloaded

and chemicals may drip out while the cars are standing on the spurs

in a totally random pattern. The Fairmount Chemical Company, the

Benjamin Moore Company, Atlas Refinery Inc, and the Fisk'e B r o t h e r s

Refining Company.all receive tank cars through this railroad spur.

Four pipes were observed along the railroad tracks west of

Blanchard Street. Two of the .pipes drain the Delissa Pallet s torage

area and are not sources of pollution. The other two are filled with

earth and appear to be old railroad culverts. Railroad drainage

ditches are connected to inlets B-106 and B-108 by pipes . The pipe

at B-108 is clogged with earth; this causes partial f looding- of the

siding during rainfall events. Leaks were found in the walls and

under the frames of inlet B-106 and B-107 when the ground was satu-

rated. The sanitary sewer is adjacent to inlet B-107 at an elevation

lower than the leaks observed. The. inlet was inspected in dry

21 FJK000022b

932110036

V. Lockwood S t ree t Ou t f a l l

A. Physical Inspection Findings

T h e s t o r m sewers i n L o c k w o o d S t r e e t , L i s t e r A v e n u e , C h a p e l

S t r ee t , Albert Avenue, Euclid Avenue and the M o r r i s Canal R i g h t - o f -

Way a l l drain t h r o u g h the Lockwood S t r e e t o u t f a l l (see P l a t e 2 ) .

D r a i n a g e f r o m p a r t s o f Raymond B o u l e v a r d , F e r r y S t r e e t , a n d t h e

Pulaski Skyway ramp are also connected to the Lockwood S t r ee t sys t em.

Separate sanitary sewers serve the entire area. All s t o r m manholes

and inlets in the s tudy area were i n s p e c t e d . The l im i t s of t ida l

f l o w were ident i f ied and all sources of dry w e a t h e r f l o w were iso-

lated. Chemical spills at i ndus t r i a l fac i l i t i es were n o t e d . The

Morr is Canal s torm sewer west of Lockwood Street (LW-8 to M C - 1 1 ) was

lamped.

(1) Lister Avenue Sewer

The manholes, inlets and pipes on Lister Avenue were coated wi th

a black oily mater ia l . S e d i m e n t d e p t h var ied b e t w e e n 0.5 and 1.5

f e e t . The source of the oil was spil lage at the B-Line T r u c k i n g

Company. Tank trucks are allowed to drain while parked at this faci-

l i ty. Black oily c h e m i c a l s . f l o w into inlets on L i s t e r Avenue and

Esther S t ree t . The flow in to E s t h e r S t r e e t is c o n t i n u o u s and the

curb has been broken out to fac i l i ta te . i t .

A continuous f low of viscous orange chemicals was obse rved en-

tering an inlet on Cornelia Street. This material came f r o m leaking

drums stored on the Cellomer Corporat ion p rope r ty . These chemical . s

were entering the Lister Avenue storm sewer. I n t e r m i t t e n t spi l lage

of black oily chemica ls was no t ed at the Fiske B r o t h e r s R e f i n i n g

Company railroad siding and a very small volume of water and oil f rom

that indus t ry was being discharged in to Es the r S t r e e t . Bo;h f lows

28 F J K Q O n - 0 2 3932110037

were enter ing the Lister Avenue s to rm s e w e r . A coo l ing wa te r dis-

charge pipe f rom Fiske Borthers was found at the inlet on the sou th -

west corner of Lockwood Street and Lister Avenue. A 2-inch +_ connec-

tion was found entering inlet LS-10. Because of its d i a m e t e r , it is

improbable that this line contains wastes. It was not f lowing when

inspected. The only building near LS-10 is o c c u p i e d by the S t a t e

Produce Company. No dry weather flow was observed u p s t r e a m of man-

hole LS-12 and no sources of po l lu t ion are s u s p e c t e d above that

poin t .

(2) Morris Canal Sewers

Continuous flow was observed in the Morris Canal storm sewers

east and west of Lockwood Street. The flow in the easterly line

(LW-8 to MC-105) was traced to the Newark Boxboard Company. This

flow was estimated at 0.16 mgd using depth measurements. The muni-

cipal swimming pool on Waydell Street was discharging an estimated

0.07 ingd into the westerly line upstream of manhole MC3. The car

wash drains at the Sunoco Station on Raymond Boulevard were found to

be connected to the storm sewer between manholes MC3 and MC-4. Per-

sonnel at Associated Auto Body and Trucks Inc. were observed dumping

paint into the storm sewer between manholes MC-6 and MC-7. Manhole

MC-7 is the limit of tidal influence and no dry weather flow was ob-

served upstream of that point. A partial blockage was found in the

invert of manhole MC-2. Sediment varying in depth between 0.5 and

1.0 feet was noted between manholes LW-8 and MC-7.

(3) Euclid Avenue Sewer

The f low in the Euclid Avenue s to rm sewer , e s t i m a t e d at 0 .02

m g d , was traced to the Reddaway Manufacturing Company's cooling water

discharge at inlet E-104.

2 9 F J K 0 0 0 0 2 4

932110038

(4) Albert Avenue Sewer

Tidal flow was observed in the Albert Avenue storm sewer up to

manhole A-3. A minor, intermittent flow of water and oil from

Cellomer enters the Cornelia Street gutter and flows to the Albert

Avenue storm sewer. However, no dry weather flow was actually ob-

served upstream of manhole A-3.

(5) Lockwood Street Sewer

No dry weather flow was observed in the Lockwood Street storm

sewer upstream of manhole LW-8. There is no indication of pollutant

sources above that point. The cross-connections shown on the sewer

plans were inspected and found to be sealed. A railroad drain on the

south side of the Messinger Trucking and Warehouse Corporation build-

ing appeared to be connected to the Lockwood Street sanitary sewer.

Major spillage of chemicals was observed at the Atlas Refinery Inc.

railroad siding. The eastern portion of this siding drains into

railroad drainage ditches that are connected to the Blanchard Street

storm sewer system. The discharges from Newark Boxboard, the muni-

cipal swimming pool, and Reddaway Manufacturing produce a base dis-

charge of approximately 0.25 mgd.

(6) Lister Avenue Tide Gate

There was no evidence of chemical attack or deterioration of the

concrete chamber. Sediment in the invert of the chamber prevents the

Lister Avenue tide gate from closing completely. The gate allows in-

flow during the rising tide. Assuming a five foot tidal range and an

open tide gate, approximately 270,000 gallons of river water enters

with each incoming tide, mixes with pollutants being discharged into

the system and flows back into the river as the tide falls. A typi-

cal diurnal flow pattern at the tide gate is shown on Plats 9. If

30 FJK000025

932110039

the tide gates were to close completely, the discharge from the

system of any polluted flow would be restricted to a relatively short

period around low tide.

(7) Lockwood Street Outfall

An abandoned railroad drain was found connected to manhole LS-1.

The last 25 feet of the 72-inch outfall was exposed and showed evi-

dence of chemical attack. Portion of the crown had completely de-

teriorated. The headwall was not deteriorated and there was no evi-

dence of chemical attack below the spring line of the pipe.

31

932110040

B. Dry Weather Flow Sampling and Flow Montoring

Sources of dry weather flow and limits of tidal influence were

noted during the physical survey. Those sewers' in which flow was

observed were subdivided for sampling. The first set of samples was

obtained on May 2, 1978. The second set was taken on June 14, 1978.

The laboratory analysis of these samples is shown in Appendix A.

Both sets of samples show high levels of pollution on Lockwood

Street, Lister Avenue, Albert Avenue, and the easterly portion of the

Morris Canal storm sewer. The samples in the Euclid Avenue sewer

fell within water quality standards. Because of tidal action, it was

not possible to confirm that all high pollutant readings were caused

by discharges near the respective sampling points. A discharge of

pollutants anywhere in the system within the tidal range could be

mixed and carried to distant sampling points. Samples were obtained

at the following locations.

LW-Q Lockwood Street Outfall at the Passaic River

LS-2 Lister Avenue upstream of the tide gate chamber

LS-4 Lister Avenue upstream of Lockwood Street

LS-7 Lister Avenue at Joseph Street

LW-1 Lockwood Street upstream of Lister Avenue

LW-4 Lockwood Street upstream of Albert Avenue

LW-7 Lockwood Street downstream of the Morris Canal

A-l Albert Avenue at Lockwood Street

A-3 Albert Avenue at Joseph Street

E-l Euclid Avenue at Lockwood Street

E-104 Euclid Avenue (cooling water connection at inlet)

MC-1 Morris Canal at Lockwood Street (west side)

MC-3 Morris Canal 500 ft. west of Lockwood Street

MC-7 Morris Canal 1400 ft. west of Lockwood Street

MC-100 Morris Canal at Lockwood Street (east side)

MC-104 Morris Canal 800 ft. east of Lockwood Street

FJKoonrm932110041

E u c l i d Avenue w a s e l i m i n a t e d f r o m f u r t h e r s t u d y b e c a u s e o f

s a m p l i n g r e s u l t s . T h e c o o l i n g w a t e r d i s c h a r g e d a t R e d d a w a y

M a n u f a c t u r i n g was sampled at inlet E-104. The M o r r i s Canal s t o r m

sewer west of Lockwood Street (LW-8 to MC-11) was e l i m i n a t e d on the

basis of physical inspect ion, ' lamping and sampling. The in te rmi t ten t

sources of pollution at the Sunoco Car Wash and Associated A u t o B o d y

have been i d e n t i f i e d . The high levels of p o l l u t a n t s d e t e c t e d at

manhole MC-1 in the May 2 sampling is a t t r i b u t e d to these s o u r c e s .

Sediment downstream caused flow to pool at manhole MC-7 and r e m a i n

there as the tide went ou t . P o l l u t a n t s f r o m d o w n s t r e a m a p p e a r to

have been ca r r i ed in to t h a t m a n h o l e by t he t i d e c a u s i n g t he

contamination detected in the MC-7 sample on June 14. The 72 - inch

L o c k w o o d S t r e e t O u t f a l l was no t t e l ev i sed because t h e r e was no

ev idence of po l lu tan t sources in the line. The B e n j a m i n M o o r e

Company is the only industry adjacent to the ou t fa l l . Maps p r o v i d e d

by t he C i ty o f N e w a r k show the r o o f d r a i n s f r o m one b u i l d i n g

connected to the outfal l . The Benjamin Moore l a b o r a t o r y is l oca t ed

in that building but there are no chemical process f a c i l i t i e s . The

plant engineer indicates that all other surface and roof d r a i n a g e is

pumped directly into the Passaic River . All o t h e r s t o r m sewers in

which f low was observed were scheduled for television inspect ion.

F J K 0 0 0 0 2 8

33

932110042

C. Smoke Test ing

The s torm and sanitary sewers on Lockwood S t ree t , Lister Avenue,

Albert Avenue, and the easterly por t ion of the M o r r i s Canal r i gh t -

of-way were smoke tested. No problems were obse rved when the s t o r m

sewers were tested. The pipe connecting to manhole LS-1 was found toi! terminate in an embankment along the nearby railroad spur. This pipe

may have functioned as a railroad drain b e f o r e the t r ack e l eva t ion

was lowered; i t se rves no pu rpose now. The e f f e c t i v e n e s s of the

smoke t e s t i n g may have been r e d u c e d in the l a rge r s t o r m s e w e r s .

Blowers were used to force smoke into the pipes under p r e s s u r e . The

volume of the Lockwood Street storm sewer (66-inch) and the number of

I inlet openings reduced the p r e s s u r e behind the smoke and may have

I prevented it f rom reaching remote connections.

Three inflow sources were detected when the s a n i t a r y sewer was

smoke tested. All observed roof and area d ra ins at A t l a s R e f i n e r y

Inc. were connected to the sanitary sewer. These drains are a m a j o r

source of inflow and should be r e c o n n e c t e d to the s t o r m sewer . A

cross connection was found at the intersection of Joseph S t r e e t and

Lister Avenue. The storm inlet at th~ s o u t h w e s t co rne r of the in-

tersection is connected to the adjacent sanitary manhole. The sani-

tary sewer elevation is lower than the inlet invert. Sanitary sewage

could enter the storm sewer if a blockage occur red . Smoke also es-

caped f rom the site of a demolished building at the southwest c o r n e r

of the Lockwood Street-Albert Avenue intersect ion. It a p p e a r s tha t

the building connection was not sealed. No smoke was o b s e r v e d es-

caping from plumbing vents. It is probable that all connec t ions to

the storm and sanitary sewer have line traps which would prevent the

passage of smoke.

34

932110043

D. Television Inspection

The fol lowing lengths of storm sewer were inspected using closed

circuit television.

Lis ter Avenue LS-1 to LS-3

Li s t e r Avenue LS-4 to LS-11

Lockwood Street LS-3 to LW-8

Albert Avenue A-l to A-3

Morr is Canal LW-8 to MC-104

The inspection of the L i s t e r Avenue line revealed an oil se-

parator at Atlas Refinery Inc. connected to the 66- inch s t o r m sewer

approximately 120 ft. upstream of manhole LS-2. This connec t ion is

believed to be a major source of p o l l u t a n t s . There is a r a i l r oad

siding drainage system connected to this oil s e p a r a t o r . Tank cars

containing chemicals are unloaded at the siding daily and spil ls are

f r e q u e n t . Much of the spillage is believed to pass t h r o u g h the se-

para tor and enter the Lister Avenue storm sewer. No other sources of

f low were found during the television inspect ion of Lis ter A v e n u e .

Significant sett lement was noted between LS-4 and LS-11. The tele-

vision camera went under water f requent ly and came out at in le ts and

manholes. Most l eng ths of pipe had se t t l ed more than 15 inches .

Based upon the portions of line that could be seen and the relatively

recent date of construction (1970) , no illegal connect ions are sus-

pected. The pollution in the line resu l t s f r o m spi l lage at B-Line

Trucking and Cellomer, as well as pollutants washed in by the t ide .

The f low from the Atlas oil separator, immediately d o w n s t r e r m , could

cause high pollutant concentrations in the L i s t e r Avenue s t o r m se-

wer .

Several connec t ions were f o u n d in the Lockwood S t r e e t s t o r m

sewer between manholes LW-4 and LW-3. Pipes were located 3': f t . , 92

f t . , 104 f t . , 133 f t . , 143 f t . and 200 f t . d o w n s t r e a m o f manho le

FJK000030932110044

LW-4. The pipes at 92 f t . and 104 f t . are shown on old plans as

connections to inlets at the in te r sec t ion . These inlets were con-

nected to the new Albert Avenue storm sewer in 1970. The pipes at 34

f t . , 143 ft. and 200 ft. appear to be roof or floor drain connections

to the Messinger Trucking and Warehouse Corporation bui lding. T h e r e

are no wastes eminating f rom this f ac i l i t y . The c o n n e c t i o n at 143

ft. may also be a concrete spall; the pipe could not be seen clearly.

The connection at 133 ft. comes f r o m the west s ide of the s t r ee t in

the vicinity of the Albert Avenue in tersec t ion . This p ipe is not

shown on the storm sewer plans, but it may be an abandoned inlet con-

nection. These connections were not flowing when the pipe was tele-

vised .

A connection of unknown origin was obse rved in the Lockwood

Avenue storm sewer 53 ft. d o w n s t r e a m of manhole LW-3. Inlet con-

nections were also observed 170 ft. and 183 ft. downs t r eam of LW-3.

The pipe at 53 ft. connected on the east side and may be f r o m A t l a s

Ref inery Inc. A pipe crossing broken into the crown of the 66-inch

line and running pe rpend icu l a r to it was no ted at 201 ft . These

pipes were not flowing when televised. A 2-inch +_ connection located

approximately 10 ft. upstream of manhole LW-2 has been observed by

City personnel. This c o n n e c t i o n comes f r o m the east side of the

s t reet and was d i scharg ing f l ow when obse rved . This connect ion

appeared to originate at Atlas Refinery Inc.

Three connections were noted between manholes LW-2 and LW-1 in

the Lockwood street storm sewer. Pipes were observed 149 f t . , 159

ft. and 215 ft. downstream of manhole LW-2 . The connec t ion at 159

ft. is believed to be f r o m an inlet that was removed du r ing con-

struction of a new building at Atlas Refinery Inc. The connection at

149 ft. appeared to be a large pipe 24- inch + s u r r o u n d e d by r o o t s .

It could also be a connection crossing the 66-inch l ine. The con-

nection at 215 ft . was f r o m the w e s t e r l y side of the s t r e e t . I t

36

F J K 0 0 0 0 3 1932110045

could not be seen clearly and may be a concrete spal l . No f l o w was

observed f rom any of these pipes.

No improper connect ions were f o u n d in the Alber t Avenue s t o r m

sewer or in the Morris Canal line between manholes LW-8 and M C - 1 0 4 .

The pollutants detected in the Albert Avenue line appear to have been

carried in by tidal action. Two sources of pollutants are s u s p e c t e d

in the Morris Canal sewer east of Lockwood S t r e e t . The l imi t of

tidal influence is downst ream of manhole MC-104 . Y e t , p o l l u t a n t s

w e r e d e t e c t e d in the sample o b t a i n e d a t t h a t m a n h o l e . N e w a r k

Boxboard d i s c h a r g e s the f l o w sampled at MC-104 and that f l o w is

polluted. However, the concentration of p o l l u t a n t s d o w n s t r e a m , at

manhole MC-100, is three times greater than at MC-104 . Some pol lu-

tants may settle into the sediment during the high tide periods. Flow

f r o m Newark Boxboard may f l u s h some of this m a t e r i a l and c a r r y it

into the Lockwood Street storm sewer.

p j K n n n o 3 2932110046

E. Conclusions and Recommendations

1. Several improvements are r e q u i r e d at Atlas R e f i n e r y Inc.

The f i rm should be required to connect its oil separator to

the sanitary sewer r a the r than to the s t o r m sewer . The

spillage at the railroad s id ing shou ld be c leaned up and

procedures developed to p r e v e n t f u t u r e spi l l s . Roof and

area drains should be connected to the s t o r m sewer r a t h e r

than to the sanitary sewer as at p resen t . The plant has

been expanded several t imes over the yea r s and comple t e

p lans o f the p ip ing s y s t e m s a re no t a v a i l a b l e . The

Lockwood Street storm sewer is located under the sidewalk

in f ront of the Atlas plant. Connect ions could have been

made w i t h o u t excavat ion in the s t r ee t . C o n n e c t i o n s of

unknown origin be tween manholes LW-3 and LW-1 appear to

lead to drains in the Atlas plant complex. Fiske B r o t h e r s

Refining Company, the industry across the street, is a less

likely point of origin since they would have had to exca-

vate the street and cross the sanitary sewer to make con-

nections to the storm sewer. Atlas should be r e q u i r e d to

evaluate its piping and identify connec t ions to the s t o r m

sewer. Any s a n i t a r y f ac i l i t i e s , chemica l p r o c e s s e s , or

drains that accept polluted flow should be r e c o n n e c t e d to

the sanitary sewer. A u t h o r i z e d d i scha rges to the s to rm

sewer should be made through a manhole or chamber to allow

monitoring by the City.

2. Fiske Brothers Refining Company should be required to cease

discharging oil and water into Esther Street and to prevent

spills at their railroad siding. Fiske Brothers should be

required to i d e n t i f y exis t ing connect ions to the s torm

sewer. Connections that accep t p o l l u t a n t s should be re-

connected to the sanitary sewer . C o n n e c t i o n s tha t ca r ry

38

932110047

nonpolluted f low should be made th rough a chamber to fac-

ilitate moni tor ing by the City.

3. After Atlas and Fiske Brothers have evaluated their p i p i n g

and reconnected lines as necessary, the r emain ing connec-

tions of unknown o r ig in b e t w e e n LW-3 and LW-1 shou ld be

sealed as a precaution. Initially, temporary plugs should

be installed. If. the lines are a c t i ve , a backup will be

repor ted . If no problems occur af ter one m o n t h , the con-

nections should be permanent ly sealed. The connec t ions

observed be tween LW-4 and LW-3 are bel ieved to be roo f

drains f rom the Mess inge r W a r e h o u s e and a b a n d o n e d inlet

connections. They should not be sealed.

4. B-Line Trucking Company should be r e q u i r e d to cease dis-

charging black oily was te into L i s t e r Avenue and E s t h e r

Street . The spillage that has already occur red should be

cleaned up. This flow is believed to be the m a j o r source

of black oil in the system.

5. Newark Boxboard Company should be required to evaluate its

in te rna l p ip ing . Only n o n p o l l u t e d f l o w should be dis-

charged into the Morris Canal storm sewer . Po l lu t ed f l o w

should be discharged into the Blanchard S t r ee t s an i t a ry

sewer after that line is cleaned. The City should m o n i t o r

the flow at manhole MC-104 to assure compliance.

6. Associated Auto Body and Trucks, Inc. should be p roh ib i t ed

from dumping paint or other was tes into the Morr i s Canal

storm sewer.

7. The car wash drains at the Sunoco Sta t ion should be re-

connected to the sanitary sewer. Suitable grit removal and

oil separation facilities should be provided.

39

932110048

8. Celloraer C o r p o r a t i o n should be r e q u i r e d Co clean up the

spillage on their proper ty and cease d i s c h a r g i n g oil in to

Corne l i a S t r e e t . I t should be n o t e d that Ce l lomer was

informed of this problem and cleanup operations were under-

way.

9. Sources of inflow should be eliminated. The cross connec-

tion at the intersection of Joseph Street and Lister Avenue

should be sealed. The railroad siding dra in on the so.uth

side of the Messinger Warehouse should be disconnected from

the sanitary sewer. The At las roo f and area dra ins have

already been discussed.

10. The L i s t e r Avenue s t o r m sewer , wes t of Lockwood S t r e e t

should be cleaned of debris, sediment and oily wastes.

F J K 0 0 0 0 3 540

932110049

8

932110050

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Page 1 of 17

Decide with Confidence

4 Back To Report Archive

D&B Comprehensive Report: F1SKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Pase2of 17

Understanding SIC:FinancialStatements

UnderstandingKey BusinessRatios Line of

Submit a Credit business:Reference on thisBusiness

2992•Jump to: SIC &

NAICSSection

Mfg greases &blends lubricatingoils

Financial strength:

Composite creditappraisal:

Formerly1R2

3A is $1 to 10 million.

1 is high.

• Jump to: Credit CapacitySummary

Corporate Family ©

P View the interactive global family tree for this business - now included as part ofdJESli your Preferred Pricing subscription.

This business is at the top of the corporate family. Click the link below to view subsidiaries and branches.

View more family members

(?) About Executive Summ;

XCLUSIVE

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Back to Top

The Financial Stress Class of 1 for this company shows that during the previous year, firms with thisclassification had a failure rate of 0.49% (49 per 10,000), which is lower than the national average.

The Credit Score class of 1 for this company shows that during the previous year, 2.3% of the firms with thisclassification paid one or more bills severely delinquent, which is lower than the national average.

Financial information from a fiscal statement dated 12/31/04 is included.

Predictive Scores

Financial Stress Class

Financial Stress Score

Credit Score Class

Other Key Indicators

Current PAYDEX

This Business

1

1526

1

6 days beyond terms

Comments

Failure Rate lower than the national average

Highest Risk: 1,001; Lowest Risk: 1,850

Probability of Severely Delinquent Paymentis lower than the national average

Pays more promptly than the average for itsindustry of 8 days beyond terms

Industry Median 8 days beyond terms

Present management control 52 years

UCC Filings UCC filing(s) are reported for this business

Public Filings No record of open Suit(s), Lien(s), or Judgment(s) in the D&B database

History Is clear

Special Events Are reported for this business

CREDIT CAPACITY SUMMARY

Back to Top

(?) D&B Rating:

Financial strength:

3A1

3A indicates $1 to 10 million.

https://www. dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever. asp?

('{) About Credit Capacity Surnm;

F J K 0 0 0 0 3 7932110052

12/7/2005


Composite credit appraisal: 1 is high.

This credit rating was assigned because of D&B's assessment of the company's financial ratios and its cash flow.For more information, see the D&B Rating Key.

Sales: $24,264,538 Payment Activity:# of Employees Total: 109 (34 here) (based on 74 experiences)

As of 12/31/04 Average High Credit: $8,670Worth: $9,630,277 Highest Credit: $100,000Working Capital: $6,034,944 Total Highest Credit: $622,450

Note: The Worth amount in this section may have been adjusted by D&B to reflect typical deductions, such ascertain intangible assets.

SPECIAL EVENTS © About Special EveiBack to Top

11/15/2004A Rating change has occurred on this company.

Jump to:

Overview | Payments | Public Filings | History & Operations ] Banking & Finance

Scores

FINANCIAL STRESS SUMMARY (?) About Financial Stress Summ;Back to Top

The Financial Stress Summary Model predicts the likelihood of a firm ceasing business without paying all creditorsin full, or reorganization or obtaining relief from creditors under state/federal law over the next 12 months. Scoreswere calculated using a statistically valid model derived from D&B's extensive data files.

High Moderate Low

Financial Stress Class: 1

5 4 3 2 1

Low risk of severe financial stress, such as a bankruptcy, over the next 12 months.

Incidence of Financial Stress

Among Businesses with thisClassification: 0.49% (49 per 10,000)National Average 1.40% (140 per 10,000)

Financial Stress National Percentile: 93 (Highest Risk: 1; Lowest Risk: 100)

Financial Stress Score: 1526 (Highest Risk: 1,001; Lowest Risk: 1,850)

The Financial Stress Class of this business is based on the following factors: f~ J | \ U U U U O O

No record of open suit(s), lien(s), or judgement(s) in the D&B files.Control age or date entered in D&B files indicates lower risk.Payment experiences exist for this firm which are greater than 60 days past due.9% of trade experiences indicate slow payment(s) are present.Business owns facilities.

932110053

https://vvww.dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp? 12/7/2 005

D&B Comprehensive Report: F1SKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Paae4of 17

Notes:

The Financial Stress Class indicates that this firm shares some of the same business and financialcharacteristics of other companies with this classification. It does not mean the firm will necessarilyexperience financial stress.The Incidence of Financial Stress shows the percentage of firms in a given Class that discontinued operationover the past year with loss to creditors. The Incidence of Financial Stress - National Average represents thinational failure rate and is provided for comparative purposes..The Financial Stress National Percentile reflects the relative ranking of a company among all scorablecompanies in D&B's file.The Financial Stress Score offers a more precise measure of the level of risk than the Class and Percentile. 1is especially helpful to customers using a scorecard approach to determining overall business performance.All Financial Stress Class, Percentile, Score and Incidence statistics are based on 2002.

Financial Stress Norms Comparison (%)

ti

c

i0.

93%

60%

49%

100 -90

80

70

60

50

40

30

20

10

0This Business Region Industry

Reqion = MIDDLE ATLANTICIndustry = MANUFACTURINGEmployee Range = 100-499Years in Business = 26 +

82%

55%

Employee Yeats inRange Business

Norms

This Business

Region:MIDDLE ATLANTIC

Industry:MANUFACTURING

Employee Range:100-499

Years in Business:26 +

National %

93

60

49

55

82

This business has a Financial Stress Percentile that shows:

• Lower risk than other companies in the same region.• Lower risk than other companies in the same industry.• Lower risk than other companies in the same employee size range.• Lower risk than other companies with a comparable number of years in business.

CREDIT SCORE CLASS SUMMARY

Back to Top(?) About Credit Score Class Surnm;

The Credit Score class predicts the likelihood of a firm paying in a severely delinquent manner (90+ Days PastTerms) over the next twelve months. It was calculated using statistically valid models and the most recent paymerinformation in D&B's files.

High Moderate Low

Credit Score Class: 1

5 4 3 2 1

Low risk of severe payment delinquency over next 12 months.

Incidence of Delinquent Payment

Among Companies with this Classification: 2.30%

F J K 0 0 0 0 3 9

https://w\vw.dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp'?

932110054

12/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO PaseSo f 17

Credit Score Percentile: 91 (Highest Risk: 1; Lowest Risk: 100)

The Credit Score Class of this business is based on the following factors:

• Control age or date entered in D&B files indicates lower risk.• No record of open suit(s), lien(s), or judgments(s) in the D&B files.• D&B files indicate a net worth of $9,630,277.• Quick ratio is 1.1.

Notes:

• The Incidence of Delinquent Payment is the percentage of companies with this classification that werereported 90 days past due or more by creditors. The calculation of this value is based on an inquiry weightesample.

• The Percentile ranks this firm relative to other businesses. For example, a firm in the 80th percentile has alower risk of paying in a severely delinquent manner than 79% of all scorable companies in D&B's files.

Credit Score Norms Comparison (%)

100 -

90

-, 803

- 70:: 60

! 50

! 40

30

20

10

0This Business Region Industry

Reqion = MIDDLE ATLANTICIndustry =MANUFACTURINGEmployee Range = 100-499Years in Business = 26 +

70%

Employee Years inRange Business

Norms

This Business

Region:MIDDLE ATLANTIC

Industry:MANUFACTURING

Employee Range:100-499

Years in Business:26 +

National %

91

43

53

54

70

This business has a Credit Score Percentile that shows:

• Lower risk than other companies in the same region.• Lower risk than other companies in the same industry.« Lower risk than other companies in the same employee size range.• Lower risk than other companies with a comparable number of years in business.

Jump to:

Overview ] Scores

Payments

PAYMENT TRENDS

Back to Top

Total Payment Experiences in D&B'sFile:

| Public Filings | History & Operations | Banking & Finance

74

https://ww\v. dnb.com/scripts/Product Retriever, asp?

F J K 0 0 0 0 4 0 (f)AtoutPa,mm,Tre,

Current PAYDEX is: 76 equal to 6 days

932110055

12/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Paae6of 17

Payments Within Terms:(not dollar weighted)

Total Placed For Collection:

Average Highest Credit:

Largest High Credit:

Highest Now Owing:

Highest Past Due:

94%

$8,670

$100,000

$85,000

$65,000

Industry Median is:

Payment Trendcurrently is:

75

beyond terms

equal to 8 daysbeyond terms

unchanged,compared topayments threemonths ago

Indications of slowness can be the result of dispute overmerchandise, skipped invoices, etc. Accounts are sometimesplaced for collection even though the existence or amount ofthe debt is disputed.

PAYDEX ScoresBack to Top

(?) About PAYDEX Scoi

Shows the D&B PAYDEX scores as calculated on the most recent 3 months and 12 months of payment experiences

The D&B PAYDEX is a unique, dollar weighted indicator of payment performance based on up to paymentexperiences as reported to D&B by trade references. A detailed explanation of how to read and interpret PAYDEXscores can be found at the end of this report.

3-Month D&B PAYDEX: 75When weighted by dollar amount, payments tosuppliers average 8 days beyond terms.

120 days slow

100

30 days slow Prompt Anticipates

12-Month D&B PAYDEX: 76When weighted by dollar amount, payments tosuppliers average 6 days beyond terms.

120 days slow

100

30 days slow Prompt Anticipates

Based on payments collected over last 3 months. Based on payments collected over last 12 months.

D&B PAYDEX Key

f& High risk of late payment(average 30 to 120 days beyond terms)

D Medium risk of late payment(average 30 days or less beyond terms)

B Low risk of late payment(average prompt to 30+ days sooner)

PAYDEX Yearly TrendBack to Top

12 Month PAYDEX Scores Comparison to Industry

1/05 2/05 3/05 4/05 5/05 6/05 7/05 8/05 9/05 10/05 11/05 12/05

This Business 79

Industry Quartiles

UpperMedianLower

77 76 76 76 76 76 75

797569

797669

76

797569

76 76 76

797568

https://www. dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetrieyer.asp?932110056

12/7/2005


Shows the trend in D&B PAYDEX scoring over the past 12 months.

PAYDEX

10CT

90-

80-

70-

60-

50-

40-

30-

20-

USJJ

7?

Jan-'05

Feb-'05

-.76 76 76 76 75 76 .- -76 76 -76—e

Mar-'05

Apr-'05

May-'05

Jun-'05

Jul-'05

Aug-'05

Sep-'05

Oct-'05

Nov-'05

Dec-'05

Last 12 Months

Based on payments collected over the last 12 months.

- Current PAYDEX for this Business is 76, or equal to 6 days beyond terms

- The 12-month high is 79, or equal to 2 days beyond terms

- The 12-month low is 75, or equal to 8 days beyond terms

PAYDEX Comparison to Industry

Back to Top© About PAYDEX Comparison to Indus

Shows PAYDEX scores of this Business compared to the Primary Industry from each of the last four quarters. ThePrimary Industry is Mfg greases & blends lubricating oils, based on SIC code 2992.

Quarterly PAYDEX Scores Comparison to Industry

Previous Year

12/03 3/04 6/04 9/04

This Business UN 76 79 79Industry Quartiles

UpperMedianLower

PAYDEX

80-

7C

60-

50-

40-

30-

20-

797569

80 C>

797569

pV 63

79 7975 7569 68

A 7976>|75

T 69

UpperMedianLower

A 7976t>«76

T 69

Current Year

12/04 3/05 6/05 9/05

This Business 80 76 76 76Industry Quartiles

79 79 79 797568

7569

7669

*f79

69

7569

Q4 2004 Ql 2005 Q2 2005

932110057

hUps.Y/www.dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp?

Q3 2005

F J K 0 0 0 0 4 212/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO P a s e S o f i ?

Last 12 Months

Based on payments collected over the last 4 quarters.

Score Comparison Key: > This Business A Industry upper quartile

• Industry median

T Industry lower quartile

- Current PAYDEX for this Business is 76, or equal to 6 days beyond terms

- The present industry median score is 75, or equal to 8 days beyond terms.

- Industry upper quartile represents the performance of the payers in the 75th percentile

- Industry lower quartile represents the performance of the payers in the 25th percentile

Payment HabitsBack to Top

(;?J About Payment Hat

For all payment experiences within a given amount of credit extended, shows the percent that this Business paidwithin terms. Provides number of experiences used to calculate the percentage, and the total dollar value of thecredit extended.

$ Credit Extended

Over 100,000

50,000-100,000

15,000-49,999

5,000-14,999

1,000-4,999

Under 1,000

Based on payments collected over the last 12 months.

% of Payments Within Terms# Payment $ TotalExperiences Dollar Amount

3

2

4

6

18

35

$300,000

$105,000

$105,000

$40,000

$28,500

$11,100

100%

Payment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances, paymentbeyond terms can be the result of disputes over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc.

PAYMENT SUMMARYBack to Top

(?) About Payment Summ;

The Payment Summary section reflects payment information in D&B's file as of the date of this report.

There are 74 payment experiences in D&B's file for the most recent 12 months, with 58 experiences reportedduring the last three month period.

Below is an overview of the company's dollar-weighted payments, segmented by its suppliers' primary industries:

Total Total Dollar Largest High Within Days SlowRcv'd Amts Credit Terms

(#) ($) ($) (%) (%)

932110058

https://www.dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp?

F J K 0 0 0 0 4 312/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Pa°e9of 17

Top industries:Trucking non-localNonclassifiedTelephone communictnsMfg inorganic chemclsWhol electrical equipRadiotelephone communShort-trm busn creditPetroleum refiningWhol industrial supplMisc business credit

Mfg metal cansPaperboard millWhol chemicalsSawmill/planing mill

Mfg millworkWhol misc profsn eqptMfg crowns/closuresWhol industrial equipGeneral warehousingRet mail-order house

Natural gas distribRet-direct sellingMfg photograph equip

Mfg paint/allied prdtRegulate trnsprtationMfg industrial gasesWhol durable goodsWhol electronic parts

Whol service paperWhol hardware

Whol metal

Other payment categories:Cash experiencesPayment record unknownUnfavorable comments

Placed for collections:With D&BOther

Total in D&B's file

20

7

4

3

3

3

3

2

2

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

0

4

0

0

0

74

15,95031,250

900

155,0001,350

650

1,250155,000

100,2501,250

50,00030,00020,0005,0005,0005,0002,5002,500

2,5001,0001,000

750

250

250

250

250

250

100

100

50

0

0

32,8500

0

N/A

2,500 91 9 0 0 0

10,000 100 0 0 0 0

500 100 0 0 0 0

100,000 100 0 0 0 0

1,000 100 0 0 0 0

500 100 0 0 0 0

500 90 10 0 0 0

100,000 100 0 0 0 0

100,000 50 50 0 0 0

750 100 0 0 0 0

50,000 100 0 0 0 0

30,000 50 0 0 0 50

20,000 100 0 0 0 '0

5,000 100 0 0 0 0

5,000 100 0 0 0 '0

5,000 100 0 0 0 0

2,500 50 50 0 0 0

2,500 100 0 0 0 0

2,500 50 50 0 0 0

1,000 100 0 0 0 0

1,000 100 0 0 0 0

750 100 0 0 0 0

250 100 0 0 0 0

250 100 0 0 0 0

250 100 0 0 0 0

250 100 0 0 0 0

250 100 0 0 0 0100 100 0 0 0 0

100 100 0 0 0 0

50 100 0 0 0 0

0 0 0 0 0 0

0

25,000

0

0

0

100,000

The highest Now Owes on file is $85,000 The highest Past Due on file is $65,000

Accounts are sometimes placed for collection even though the existence or amount of the debt is disputed.Indications of slowness can be result of dispute over merchandise, skipped invoices, etc.

PAYMENT DETAILS

Sack to Top(2) About Payment Det;

F J K 0 0 0 0 4 4Detailed payment history

Date Reported Paying Record High Credit Now Owes Past Due Selling Terms Last Sale

932110059https://www.dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp? 12/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Pase 10 of 17

(mm/yy)

11/05

10/05

PptPptPptPptPptPptPptPptPptPptPpt-Slow 30

Ppt-Slow 30

(013)

(014)

(015)

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

/scripts/Produci

($)

30,000

5,000

2,500

1,000

1,000

500

250

250

250

0

2,500

2,500

25,000

7,500

100

100,000

100,000

50,000

25,000

10,000

7,500

5,000

5,000

2,500

2,500

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,000

1,0001,000

750

750

500

500

500

500

250

250

250

250

250

250

100

100

50

50

0

tRetricver.asp?

($)

0

5,000

750

1,000

100

0

0

0

0

0

2,500

2,500

15,000

7,500

0

0

85,000

2,500

25,000

0

0

250

2,500

0

750

250

0

0

100

0

750

500

0

0

100

50

0

0

0

0

100

0

0

0

100

0

0

50

0

(*)

0

0

0 N15

0

0 N15

0

0 N15

0 N15

0

0 N15

750

0 N30.

0

0

20,000

0 N30

0

0

0

0

0 N30

0

0

250

0

0

0

0 N30

0 N300

0

0 N30

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

0 N30

0

o :0

0

0 N30

0

0 N15

F J K 0 0 0 0 4 5

Within(months)

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

2-3 mos

1 mo

4-5 mos

6-12 mos

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

4-5 mos

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

2-3 mos

2-3 mos

1 mo

2-3 mos

1 mo1 mo

6-12 mos

4-5 mos

1 mo

1 mo

6-12 mos

4-5 mos

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

4-5 mos

2-3 mos

2-3 mos

1 mo

2-3 mos

6-12 mos

1 mo

6-12 mos

932110060

IZ/ ' 1/2005


09/05

08/05

06/05

05/05

04/05

01/05

12/04

09/04

Ppt-Slow 30

Ppt-Slow 30

Ppt-Slow 90+

(053)

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt-Slow 30

(058)

Satisfactory.

Ppt

Ppt

Slow 30

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

Ppt

100,000

2,500

30,000

250

750

500

500

250

250

1,000

750

250

250

100

7,500

2,500

500

100

1,000

100

100

50

100

55,000

20,000

75,000

0

25,000

250

50

250

500

50

0

0

0

0

0

0

0

500

0

250

0

0

0

0

55,000

0

65,000

0

0

0 N30

Lease Agreemnt

0

0

0

0 N30

0

0

0 '

0

0 '

0

0

0 N30

0

0 N30

0

0 N30

0 N30

0

0

1 mo

2-3 mos

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

1 mo

6-12 mos

1 rno

6-12 mos

2-3 mos

6-12 mos

6-12 mos

6-12 mos

1 mo

6-12 mos

1 mo

6-12 mos

2-3 mos

6-12 mos

6-12 mos

1 mo

6-12 mos

Payments Detail Key: M 30 or more days beyond termsPayment experiences reflect how bills are met in relation to the terms granted. In some instances payment beyondterms can be the result of disputes over merchandise, skipped invoices etc.

Each experience shown is from a separate supplier. Updated trade experiences replace those previously reported.

Jump to:

Overview Scores Payments History & Operations Banking & Finance

Public Filings

PUBLIC FILINGS

Back to Top

The following data includes both open and closed filings found in D&B's database on the subject company,

Most Recent Filing DateRecord TypeBankruptcy ProceedingsJudgmentsLiensSuitsUCC's

# of Records00105

09/30/1998

11/12/2004F J K 0 0 0 0 4 6

The following Public Filing data is for information purposes only and is not the official record. Certified copies can

932110061https://www. dnb.com/bcripts/ProductRetriever. asp? ! 2/7/2005

D&B Comprehensive Report: F1SKE BROTHERS REFINING CO Pase 12 of 17

only be obtained from the official source.

LIENS

Back to Top© About Lie

A lienholder can file the same lien in more than one filing location. The appearance of multiple liens filed by thesame lienholder against a debtor may be indicative of such an occurrence.Amount: $4,649Status: ReleasedDOCKET NO.: 9SJG14029Type: State TaxFiled by: STATE OF OHIOAgainst: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANYWhere filed: FRANKLIN COUNTY COMMON PLEAS COURT, COLUMBUS, OH

Date status attained:Date filed:Latest Info Received:

12/03/199809/30/199811/25/2002

UCC FILINGSBack to Top

Collateral:

Type:Sec. party:Debtor:Filing number:Filed with:

Date filed:Latest Info Received:

Collateral:Type:Sec. party:Debtor:Filing number:Filed with:






About UCC Filir

Negotiable instruments including proceeds and products - Inventory includingproceeds and products - Accounts receivable including proceeds and productsAssets including proceeds and products - and OTHERSOriginalSOVEREIGN BANK, ITS SUCCESSORS AND/OR ASSIGNS, PRINCETON, NJFISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANY0411121139216SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, ALBANY, NY

11/12/200411/18/2004

Products - Proceeds - LEASES,SPECIFIC EQUIPMENTOriginalAT & T CREDIT CORPORATION, PARSIPPANY, NJFISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO INCAM91788SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, COLUMBUS, OH

07/29/199609/06/1996

Leased EquipmentOriginalLYNNRAY FINANCIAL CORPORATION, NORCROSS, GAFISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANY, TOLEDO, OHAP305622SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, COLUMBUS, OH

01/04/200103/16/2001

Leased CONSIGNED MERCHANDISE including proceeds and productsOriginalAT&T CREDIT CORPORATION, PARSIPPANY, NJFISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO INC1699926SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TRENTON, NJ

05/22/199606/17/1996

-NKGQ9Q47-

932110062https://www. dnb.com/scripts/ProductRetriever.asp? 12/7/2005


932110063Type: ContinuationSec. party: FIRST UNION NATIONAL BANK F/K/A FIRST FIDELITY BANK, N.A., N.J.,

NEWARK, NJDebtor: FISKE BROTHERS REFINING COMPANYFiling number: 1465009Filed with: SECRETARY OF STATE/UCC DIVISION, TRENTON, NJ

Date filed: .05/16/1997Latest Info Received: 07/15/1997Original UCC filed date: 07/16/1992Original filing no.: 1465009

The public record items contained in this report may have been paid, terminated, vacated or released prior to thedate this report was printed.

GOVERNMENT ACTIVITY . © About Government ActivBack to Top

Activit

Documents

FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO.Dec 27, 2005 · William Chappell FISKE BROTHERS REFINING CO 129 LOCKWOOD ST Newark, NJ 07105 Re: 5G2 .General Permit Stormwater Basic NJ0088315 NJPDES: