Upload
florence-shields
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Firm Resources and
Sustained Competitive Advantage
Program Studi Doktor Ilmu ManajemenFakultas Ekonomi Universitas Airlangga
2013
Summarised by RUMAJI
Written By Jay Barney
Journal of Management
Vol. 17, No.1, 1991
Overview
Distinction between ‘environmental’ model of competitive advantage and ‘Resource-based’ model
Framework used to structure understanding of Sustained Competitive Advantage – 1960’s
Overview Framework – SWOT Analysis
Strengths
Weaknesses
Opportunities
Threats
Resource-based Model
Environmental Model
Internal Analysis
External Analysis
Environmental Model Little emphasis on impact of idiosyncratic
attributes on a firm’s competitive position
Two simplifying assumptions:
No difference between the strategically relevant resources of each firm and the strategies they pursue
Where different resources develop, these will quickly become available to all
Resources are homogeneous and mobile
Resource-based Model
Differences do exist between the strategically relevant resources of each firm and the strategies they pursue
These resources are not mobile and so differentiation can be long-lasting
Resources can be heterogeneous and immobile
Defining Resources Resources – all assets, capabilities, knowledge and
experience controlled by a firm
Physical Capital Resources – e.g. technology, location, equipment
Human Capital Resources – experience, skills
Organisational Capital Resources - Culture, formal reporting structures, control systems, coordinating systems, informal relationships
Where are we? We are discussing sustainable competitive advantage,
and have defined Competencies: AssetsCapabilitiesCompetenciesCompetitive Advantage
Next is competitive advantage. A competitive advantage is simply an advantage you
have over your competitors. A competency will produce competitive advantage
provided:A) it produces value for the organization, andB) it does this in a way that cannot easily be
pursued by competitors.
Competencies vs. Core Competencies vs. Distinctive Competencies
A competency is an internal capability that a company performs better than other internal capabilities.
A core competency is a well-performed internal capability that is central, not peripheral, to a company’s strategy, competitiveness, and profitability.
A distinctive competence is a competitively valuable capability that a company performs better than its rivals.
Competitive Advantage and Sustainable Competitive Advantage
CA - When a firm implements a value-creating strategy not being simultaneously implemented by competitors
SCA – as above + competitors are unable to duplicate
Building Sustainable Competitive Advantage Resources must be heterogeneous and
immobile Also, must be
Valuable Rare Imperfectly imitable No strategically equivalent substitutes
Sustainable Competitive Advantage1. The Question of Value:
Capabilities are valuable when they enable a firm to conceive of or implement strategies that improve efficiency and effectiveness.
Value is dependent on type of strategy: Low cost strategy: lower costs (Timex) Differentiator: add enhancing features (Rolex)
To be valuable, the capability must either Increase efficiency (outputs / inputs)
Information system reduces customer service agents required, or increases the number of calls the same number of agents can answer
Increase effectiveness (enable some new capability not previously held)
Opening a new regional campus enables outreach to a new market of students
Sustainable Competitive Advantage
2. The Question of Rareness:
Valuable resources or capabilities that are shared by large numbers of firms in an industry are therefore not rare, and cannot be a source of SCA.
Some researchers think only organizational assets or resources are rare (such as culture). What do you think?
Sustainable Competitive Advantage
3. The Question of Imitability Valuable, rare resources can only be sources of SCA if firms
that do not possess them cannot obtain them. They must be “imperfectly imitable”, i.e. impossible to perfectly imitate them.
Ways imitation can be avoided: Unique Historical Conditions (Caterpillar, e.g.) Causal Ambiguity (why resources create SCA is not
understood, even by the firm owning them) Imitating firms cannot duplicate the strategy since they do
not understand why it is successful in the first place. Social Complexity (trust, teamwork, informal relationships,
causal ambiguity where cause of effectiveness is uncertain) E.g. A competitor steals all the scientists in an R&D lab
and relocates them to a new facility. But, the “dynamics”, “culture” and “atmosphere” are not the same.
Sustainable Competitive Advantage4. The Question of Substitutability
There must be no equivalent resources that can be exploited to implement the same strategies.
Forms of substitutability: Duplication: Although no two management teams are the
same, they can be strategically equivalent, produce the same results.
Substitution: Very different resources can be substitutes, e.g. A charismatic leader with a clear vision vs. a strategic
planning dept. A superior marketing strategy for a recognized brand
name. A superior technical support group for an intelligent
diagnostic software package
Sustainable Competitive Advantage
5. The Question of Exploitation: Later research qualified this as another critieria
for SCA. Is a firm organized to exploit the full competitive potential of its resources and capabilities?
Are systems in place to enable firms to support the execution of a particular strategy?
Xerox, e.g
Notes on “Sustainable” Sustainable is not measured in calendar time. Sustainable does not mean the advantage will
last forever. Sustainable suggests the advantage lasts long
enough that competitors stop trying to duplicate the strategy that makes the advantage sustained.
Summary
Firms cannot expect to simply ‘purchase’ Sustained Competitive Advantage
Can only be found within the resources already controlled by the firm
Focus on Internal — describes firm’s internal characteristics and performance
Firms have idiosyncratic, not identical strategic resources. Resources are not perfectly mobile and therefore heterogeneous.