Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
C o m m o n Ta x R i s k s &
O p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r C o n n e c t i c u t -
b a s e d B u s i n e s s e s
June 28, 2017
Presented by:
Patrick J. Duffany, JD, CPA
Cindy R. Galamgam, JD, LLM
Coral Bernier, EA
June 28, 2017
Connecticut: An overview of taxes collected
Common errors made by Connecticut taxpayers
Corporation Business Tax
Personal Income Tax Audit issues
Income tax credits and other incentives
An overview of state and local tax concepts
Doing business (“nexus”) rules Apportionment concepts
Pass-Thru Entities
Apportionment
Withholding Reporting Requirements
Managing your state and local tax risks
A G E N D A
2
C O N N E C T I C U T: F Y E 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 5 &
2 0 1 6 TA X E S C O L L E C T E D
SUMMARY OF STATE TAX REVENUES
• Per the DRS’ Fiscal 2015-2016 Annual Report:
June 28, 2017
Tax Type FYE
6/14
FYE
6/15
FYE
6/16
% of Tax
Personal Income Tax $8.7B $9.2B $9.2B 53%
Sales/Use Tax $4.1B $4.2B $4.3B 25%
Corp. Business Tax $.8B $.8B $.9B 5%
Petroleum & Gas Taxes $.8B $.7B $.6B 3%
Cigarette Tax $.4B $.3B $.3B 2%
All other (32 +/-) $1.6B $1.6B $2B 12%
Total taxes and fees $16.4B $16.8B $17.3B 100%
3
C O N N E C T I C U T: F Y E 2 0 1 4 , 2 0 1 5 &
2 0 1 6 P E N A L T I E S & I N T E R E S T
SUMMARY OF STATE TAX REVENUES (concluded)
• Per the DRS Fiscal 2015-2016 Annual Report:
June 28, 2017
Penalties & Interest
Assessed
FYE
6/14
FYE
6/15
FYE
6/16
% of
Total
Personal Income Tax $79m $72m $70m 54%
Sales/Use Tax $36m $37m $36m 28%
Corp. Business Tax $21m $31m $11m 9%
All other (34 +/-) $12m $10m $12m 9%
Total taxes and fees $147m $150m $129m 100%
4
June 28, 2017
C O N N E C T I C U T: P I T C O L L E C T I O N S
5
C O N N E C T I C U T:
M A L L O Y ’ S P R O P O S E D B U D G E T
Gov. Malloy’s Proposed Budget:
• Increase revenue
* Courtesy of CBIA
June 28, 2017 6
C O N N E C T I C U T:
M A L L O Y ’ S P R O P O S E D B U D G E T
Gov. Malloy’s Proposed Budget (continued):
• Union concessions
• Cuts and shifts in local aid
* Courtesy of CBIA
June 28, 2017 7
C O N N E C T I C U T:
B I G G E S T B U D G E T L O S E R S
Gov. Malloy’s Proposed Budget Impact on Municipalities:
• Local aid cuts
• Redistribution of local town aid to cities
• Approximately 21 out of 169 municipalities are benefiting under proposed budget
• Towns to reimburse state for teachers retirement
• Towns will be forced to increase property tax to make up
loss in aid
• Cheshire to see an average increase in property tax of
$2,200 over 5 years!
• 29% increase over the 5 years
June 28, 2017 8
C O N N E C T I C U T:
B I G G E S T B U D G E T L O S E R S
Biggest Losers under proposed budget:
• West Hartford: $24 million
• Milford: $18 million
• Groton:$ 18 million
• Wallingford: $14 million
• South Windsor: $13 million
Biggest Winners under proposed budget:
• Hartford: $57 million
• Waterbury: $49 million
• New Britain: $36 million
• Bridgeport: $31 million
• Norwich: $14 million
June 28, 2017 9
C O N N E C T I C U T:
T H E C O N N E C T I C U T M I R R O R
For more information on how your town may be impacted,
visit:
• https://ctmirror.org/2017/05/15/how-does-your-town-
fare-under-malloys-revised-budget/#
June 28, 2017 10
C O N N E C T I C U T:
TA X F R E E D O M D AY
June 28, 2017 11
DISCLAIMER: The above is a copy of a mailing from a CT state representative. For
more information, visit: http://www.yankeeinstitute.org/2017/04/connecticut-remains-dead-last-in-the-nation-for-tax-freedom-day/
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
COMMON ERRORS
• Apportionment
• Capital tax base
• Dividends-received deduction
• Pass-through entities
• Penalty Waiver Form
• Sales/use tax
• Other items
June 28, 2017 12
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT
• Different rules for entities taxed as corporations vs.
individuals (including partnerships and S corps)
• Different rules across states
June 28, 2017 13
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (continued)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2016 tax year)
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of TPP Destination Destination
Sales of services Market Sales office
Sale of real estate Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Allocate net gain if in CT
Sale of intangibles Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Source net gain if “employed in a business . . .
carried on in” CT
Sale of pass-through entity owning real property
Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Source net gain if entity owns CT r/e and the FMV is
> 50% of assets at time of sale
Factor weighting Single factor 3 factor
14
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (continued)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2017 tax year)
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of TPP Destination Destination
Sales of services Market Market
Sale of real estate Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Allocate net gain if in CT
Sale of intangibles Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Sale of pass-through entity owning real property
Exclude unless held for sale to customers
Source net gain if entity owns CT r/e and the FMV is
> 50% of assets at time of sale
Factor weighting Single factor Single factor
15
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (continued)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2016 tax year)
• Example 1
X Corp is a manufacturer with all its manufacturing locations in CT
and its only customer in MA. X Corp has MA nexus
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of TPP Destination Destination
Factor Weighting Single factor 3 factor
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
X Corp’s CT apportionment
factor (C corp vs. S corp)
0%
(single sales factor)
67%
(Prop/ Payroll 100%; Sales 0%)
Factor weighting Single factor 3 factor
MA sales factor 100% 100%
16
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (continued)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2016 tax year)
• Example 2
X Corp is a service provider with all its offices in CT and its only
customer in MA. All work is done in CT. X Corp has MA nexus
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of services Market Sales office
Factor weighting Single factor 3 factor
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
X Corp’s CT apportionment
factor (C corp vs. S corp)
0% 100%
Factor weighting Single factor Three factor
MA sales factor 100% 100%
17
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (continued)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2017 tax year)
• Example 3
X Corp is a manufacturer with all its manufacturing locations in CT
and its only customer in MA. X Corp has MA nexus
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of TPP Destination Destination
Factor weighting Single factor Single factor
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
X Corp’s CT apportionment
factor (C corp vs. S corp)
0% 0%
Factor weighting Single factor Single factor
MA sales factor 100% 100%
18
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
APPORTIONMENT (concluded)
• Summary of Connecticut’s rules (2017 tax year)
• Example 4
X Corp is a service provider with all its offices in CT and its only
customer in MA. All work is done in CT. X Corp has MA nexus
June 28, 2017
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
Sale of services Market Market
Factor weighting Single factor Single factor
Revenue stream C corp PIT (including S corp)
X Corp’s CT apportionment
factor (C corp vs. S corp)
0% 0%
Factor weighting Single factor Single factor
MA sales factor 100% 100%
19
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
CAPITAL TAX BASE –
• Calculation of tax base:
“Surplus reserve”
Definite liability
Estimated reserves
Short-term vs. long-term
• Apportioning tax base:
Sourcing of intangible assets
Accounts receivable
Goodwill/technology
June 28, 2017 20
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
DIVIDENDS-RECEIVED DEDUCTION
• Eliminated in a combined/unitary return
• Deducted when received from a separate CBT filer
Less “expenses related to [such] dividends”
June 28, 2017 21
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES
• Must compute the apportionment factor for each type of
taxpayer:
C corp vs. PIT
• Multi-tiered partnerships
C corp
o Aggregate if unitary
o Direct allocation if not unitary
Personal income tax
o Generally, direct allocation up the tiers
June 28, 2017 22
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
PASS-THROUGH ENTITIES (concluded)
• Withholding taxes
Not paying required withholding tax
Partnerships and other pass-through entities are ultimately
responsible for composite payments
Do not rely on members to pay the tax
Issues we’ve seen . . . .
Partnerships not required to withhold on behalf of PTP’s
June 28, 2017 23
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N A U D I T
I S S U E S
CBT/PIT
• Apportionment
• Credits
Including credit for income taxes paid to other states
• Nexus
Independent representatives
Traveling employees
• Unitary
Designated members must have nexus in Connecticut
June 28, 2017 24
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES
• Exemption certificates
• Clearance certificates
Successor liability to purchaser of existing business
Significant risks in cash businesses
• Collecting sales tax
Business analysis/management and advisory services
Computer and data processing services
MRA (Manufacturers and R&D)
Management fees
New construction vs. renovation
Personnel services (temporary help)
• Remitting use tax
June 28, 2017 25
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Business analysis/management and advisory services
In order to be taxable, services must be related to either:
o Core business activities
Directly related to lines of business involving sales of products,
property, goods or services
Directly related to capital structure
Budgeting
Short-range, long-range or strategic planning
o Human resource management activities
Relating to the hiring, development, job-related training,
compensation & management of personnel
Employee relations, including labor-management relations,
collective bargaining, affirmative action
The design and implementation, but not ongoing administration,
of employee benefit plans
June 28, 2017 26
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Business analysis/management and advisory services
Business analysis:
o The examination of data followed by the furnishing of conclusions
& recommendations
o Excludes property valuation & appraisal alone
Business management:
o The day-to-day management of activities
o Not the mere rendering of advice to a recipient that itself
maintains day-to-day control (though that might be taxable as
business analysis or consulting)
June 28, 2017 27
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Business analysis/management and advisory services
Business management consulting:
o Furnishing advice on management issues
o Excludes specialized consulting in areas such as investment
banking and insurance
Business public relations:
o Preparation of materials, written or otherwise, designed to
promote the recipient’s interests and influence the general public
or other groups
o Excludes market research & analysis
June 28, 2017 28
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Business analysis/management and advisory services
It is the nature of the services being rendered, and not what those
services are called or termed by the service provider or service
recipient, that determines whether taxable services are being
rendered.
June 28, 2017 29
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Business analysis/management and advisory services
Excludes:
o Environmental consulting services
o Business analysis/management services related to aircraft
o Training services provided by an institution of higher education
o Services customarily rendered by attorneys, accountants &
actuaries
o Services rendered to corporations by board members
o Marketing, investment, investment banking, engineering,
insurance and auditing services
o Services rendered by an employee to the employer
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(a)(37)(J); Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(a)(2)(I); Conn.
Agencies Regs. 12-407(2)(i)(J)-1; Connecticut Special Notice, No. 90-2, 05/01/1990
June 28, 2017 30
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Computer and data processing services
Include:
o programming
o code writing
o modification of existing programs
o feasibility studies
o remote access to information
o payroll processing
o installation and implementation of software programs and
systems, even when rendered in connection with the
development, creation or production of canned or custom
software
o the creation, development, hosting, and maintenance of an
Internet website (effective October 1, 2015)
June 28, 2017 31
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Computer and data processing services
Reduced rate (1%)
An entity providing computer and data processing services is
considered the consumer of tangible personal property used in
rendering the services and therefore must pay sales or use tax
on its purchases.
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(a)(37)(A); Conn. Agencies Regs. 12-426-27
June 28, 2017 32
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• On-line Retailers
CT law requires on-line retailers who do not maintain a place of
business in the state and engage in “regular or systematic
solicitation of sales of tangible personal property” to collect and
remit sales tax.
In March 2017, Commissioner Sullivan issued a media release
stating that the DRS will be more aggressive with collecting sales
tax from on-line retailers that have a significant volume of sales in
CT
DRS estimates that at least $70 million is being evaded
annually
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(a)(12)(G)
June 28, 2017 33
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Manufacturing Recovery Act “MRA” (Manufacturers and
R&D)
CT gives full exemption for machinery, material, tools and fuel
used directly in manufacturing
Common errors
o Full exemption does not apply to processes related to, but not
considered direct manufacturing (e.g. R&D or testing)
Those processes qualify for MRA 50% reduction
o No tax benefit under full exemption or MRA for repair services to
machinery
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-412i
June 28, 2017 34
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• New construction vs. renovation
Contractor’s services for commercial renovation work: taxable
Contractor’s services for commercial new construction work: not
taxable
What qualifies as new construction:
o Building a new building
o Certified historic rehabilitation
o Complete gut (rarely used since all internal structure of building
must be removed)
o Initial fit out for first tenant in a building (no use may be made of
tenant’s space before fit out, including storage of material)
o Putting unimproved land to new use (not enhancing existing use)
o Adding cubic footage to existing building (only addition qualifies)
June 28, 2017 35
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Personnel services
2 necessary elements of taxable personnel service:
o A service provider must directly employ employees who will furnish
temporary or part-time help to a service recipient; and
o While an employee is with the service recipient, the service
recipient must have control over the work the employee does as
well as how the work is done within the general parameters of the
type of personnel service contracted for (for example, clerical or
accounting).
June 28, 2017 36
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Personnel services
Different from employment agency services (which are also
taxable)
Employment agency services – 2 common examples occur when
an agency attempts to:
o Obtain a job for a job seeker; or
o Find an employee for an employer
June 28, 2017 37
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (continued)
• Personnel services
The amount subject to sales tax is the entire charge by the service
provider to the service recipient
o Includes compensation of the employee and all expenses related
to the compensation, whether or not separately stated by the
service provider in its contract/invoice to the service recipient
There are limited statutory exclusions on charges for leased
employees, worksite employees of professional employer
organizations and property managers
Conn. Gen. Stat. § 12-407(a)(37)(C); Conn. Agencies Regs. 12-426-27;
Connecticut Policy Statement 2006(7), 03/30/2007
June 28, 2017 38
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N E R R O R S
SALES/USE TAXES (concluded)
• Personnel services – Risks:
Temporary help is the most problematic
o If the service provider (instead of the service recipient) has control
over the temporary personnel, taxability depends on the specific
service(s) performed by the personnel (is it an enumerated
taxable service?)
Service providers subcontracting services
o If ultimate service being sold to service recipient is enumerated,
service provider can buy temporary help on a resale basis
o If ultimate service being sold to service recipient is not
enumerated, service provider must pay tax on subcontracted
temporary help
June 28, 2017 39
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N A U D I T
I S S U E S
SALES/USE TAXES
• Missing records
• Use of procurement cards
• POS system not being used for tax purposes
Using bank records is not as accurate or reliable
• Use tax
• Nexus
June 28, 2017 40
C O N N E C T I C U T: C O M M O N A U D I T
I S S U E S
PROPERTY TAX
• Manufacturing equipment
Exempt, but only if form M-65 is timely filed
If not filed, taxable
If late, taxable
Can be significant tax
• Classification of leasehold improvements
Real vs. tangible vs. duplicate assessment
• Yearly income and expense report
Must be filed by June 1 (certified mail recommended)
10% penalty for 1 day late!
• General mailings
Certified mail
Hand delivery with receipt (copy stamped by the assessor)
June 28, 2017 41
C O N N E C T I C U T: I N C O M E T A X
C R E D I T S A V A I L A B L E T O P A S S -
T H R O U G H E N T I T I E S
CREDITS:
• Angel Investor Credit
Credit allowed against the personal income tax
Credit applies against the personal income tax and equals 25% of
the amount taxpayers invest in technology-based businesses*, up
to $250,000
*The CT Legislature passed a bill that is waiting to be signed by
the Governor which would extend the credit to all industries
The budget bill signed June 2, 2016 extends the sunset date for
the angel investor tax credit from July 1, 2016 to July 1, 2019, and
now permits taxpayers to sell or transfer all or part of the credit
June 28, 2017 42
C O N N E C T I C U T: I N C O M E T A X
C R E D I T S A V A I L A B L E T O P A S S -
T H R O U G H E N T I T I E S
CREDITS:
• The following credits, while generated by pass-through
entities, cannot be applied against personal income tax
for individual owners of pass-through entities:
Rehabilitation of Certified Historic Structure for Residential,
Nonresidential or Mixed Use
Employment Expansion Project Pass-Through Credit
Apprenticeship Training in Manufacturing
June 28, 2017 43
C O N N E C T I C U T: C R E D I T S
AVA I L A B L E T O C O R P O R AT I O N S
MOST POPULAR CREDITS:
• Research and Development
• Fixed Capital Investment
• Machinery & Equipment Expenditure
• Human Capital Investment
• Film, Television and Digital Media
• Historic Rehabilitation
• Electronic Data Processing (EDP)
• Credit limitation
Currently 55% limit 2016
60% limit January 1, 2017
65% limit January 1, 2018
70% limit January 1, 2019
June 28, 2017 44
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
June 28, 2017 45
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS IN OTHER STATES
• “We impose our tax to the full extent of the U.S.
Constitution.”
June 28, 2017 46
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Two primary state tax questions: Do I have a taxable presence?
Do I care?
• Primary taxes – sales, income, property, employment
• Which taxes do I need to care about? California
Gross receipt-type taxes (OH, sales tax)
Personal income taxes??
• How do I manage state tax risk?
June 28, 2017 47
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 1: Do I have a taxable presence?
• For states to impose tax on a taxpayer, the taxpayer must
establish a taxable presence (e.g., nexus) in the taxing jurisdiction Physical (including “Amazon”)
Economic
June 28, 2017 48
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 1: Do I have a taxable presence?
• Any physical presence is generally sufficient to establish
nexus Employees or representatives entering a state
o Traveling employees
o 3rd party representatives
Solicitation or services activities
“Amazon”
Property located within a state
o Inventory
o Equipment
June 28, 2017 49
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Sales tax nexus vs. income tax nexus
• There is a difference!!!
• Sales tax: Physical presence – Quill
“Amazon” rules
• Other taxes (including corporate income taxes): Physical presence
Economic presence
• What’s going on: Income tax: Expansion of “economic” nexus
Sales tax: Expansion of “Amazon” nexus
June 28, 2017 50
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Remote seller/Affiliate nexus – varies by state
** Notice required
June 28, 2017
Jurisdictions
Alabama** Illinois Missouri Pennsylvania
Arkansas Kansas Nevada Rhode Island
California Kentucky** New Jersey South Dakota**
Colorado** Louisiana** North Carolina Tennessee**
Connecticut Maine New York Texas
Georgia Michigan Ohio Vermont**
Iowa Minnesota Oklahoma** Washington
51
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Use Tax Notice Requirement
• States require noncollecting out-of-state vendors that meet
a threshold to inform customers that purchases may be
subject to use tax
• Vendors must file an annual statement with the State which
includes total amount paid by purchaser in past year
* Eff. 7/1/2017
June 28, 2017
Jurisdiction Threshold
Alabama* No threshold
Colorado* $100,000
Kentucky $100,000
Louisiana $50,000
Oklahoma $100,000
South Dakota $100,000
52
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Use Tax Notice Requirement
• Colorado:
1) Retailer must notify CO customers that retailer
does not collect CO sales tax and customer is
obligated to self-report and pay use tax
2) Retailer must provide CO customers* an annual
report detailing purchases, including dates and
amounts and remind customers they are obliged to
remit use tax
3) Provide CO DOR an annual report with customers
names, address and total purchases from retailer
4) CO will assess small file ($5-$10) on each failure to
file any of the above notices
* Who purchased more than $500 of taxable goods from retailer
June 28, 2017 53
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Use Tax Notice Requirement
• Louisiana:
1) At time of purchase retailer must notify LA
customers that purchases are subject to use tax,
unless specifically exempt and purchasing over the
internet is not an exemption
2) Retailer must provide LA customers an annual
notice by Jan 31 with total amount paid by
purchaser as well as dates of purchase and
amounts, if possible, and whether purchase is
exempt or not. Must also include name of retailer
and that use tax may be due
3) Retailer must provide by March 1 to LA DOR an
annual report for each purchaser which includes
total amount paid by customer
June 28, 2017 54
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Sales and Use Economic Nexus
* Eff. 7/1/2017
** Being challenged in court
*** Enacted but not effective until Quill is overturned
June 28, 2017
Jurisdiction Threshold
Alabama** $250,000
Indiana* $100,000
Massachusetts* $500,000
North Dakota*** $100,000
South Dakota** $100,000
Tennessee** $500,000
Vermont*** $100,000
Wyoming* $100,000
55
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Economic nexus
• Sales vs. property/payroll bright-line standards
June 28, 2017
Jurisdiction Threshold
Alabama $500,000
California $547,711
Colorado $500,000
Connecticut $500,000
Michigan $350,000
New York $1,000,000
AZ, MA, MN, others No threshold
OH, NV, TN, WA Gross receipt taxes
56
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• How to manage “nexus” risk Identify the jurisdictions in which you have significant customers
Identify the jurisdictions in which you have property
Identify the jurisdictions in which you have employees or “representatives”
June 28, 2017 57
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
June 28, 2017 58
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care? Income tax
Sales tax
Gross Receipts tax
Property tax
Employment taxes
June 28, 2017 59
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care – Income tax?
• Limitation on a state’s right to impose its income tax – PL
86-272: No State, or political subdivision thereof, shall have power to impose, . . ., a
net income tax on the income derived within such State by any person
from interstate commerce if the only business activities within such State . .
. during such taxable year are [limited to] . . .the solicitation of orders . . .
[for] sales of tangible personal property, which orders are sent outside the
State for approval or rejection, and, if approved, are filled by shipment or
delivery from a point outside the State. . . .
Services are not protected
Protection only applies to income taxes
June 28, 2017 60
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care – Income tax?
• Do I owe tax? Taxable loss?
Apportionment results in no state sourced income?
o Service business vs. tangible personal property
o Throwback and throwout considerations
Am I losing any potential tax credits?
• If you have “nexus”, a return is typically due, even if no
tax
June 28, 2017 61
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Typical apportionment rules Tangible property
o Destination (but can be sales office for individual income tax
purposes)
Services (SaaS, software, etc)
o Market (i.e., where is the benefit received)?
o Cost of performance (i.e., where is the work done – all or nothing
test)
o Relative cost of performance
o These rules are changing
June 28, 2017 62
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Typical apportionment rules for services
• 21 Market States in 2017 vs. 13 Market States in 2012
June 28, 2017
Jurisdiction Individual Corporation
California Market Market
Connecticut Sales office or RCOP
*Until 1/1/17, then
Market
RCOP
*Until 1/1/16, then
Market
Massachusetts Market Market
New Jersey Sales office COP
New York State RCOP if sold from a NY
office
Market
63
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Case Study #1 Facts
o XYZ Partnership is a CT based service business with offices in CT
and MA and has only individual partners
o CA based corporate client contacts XYZ
o Project is to develop an IT infrastructure for use in CA
o 60% of the costs are incurred in CT and 40% in MA
o Fees for this matter are $1,000,000
2016 result 2017 result
o CA sales factor: 100% CA sales factor: 100%
o CT sales factor: 100% (could be 60%) CT sales factor: 0%
o MA sales factor: 0% MA sales factor: 0%
Risks?
o Sales tax?
o Credit for taxes paid
June 28, 2017 64
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Case Study #2 Facts
o CT based law firm, taxed as a P.C., with CT and MA offices
o NY based corporate client
o Litigating an employment law matter in MA for an employee who
lived in MA, but worked in CT
o Managed by the corporate client’s Boston office
o Billed to client’s NY office
o Fees for this matter are $1,000,000
2017 result
o Where is the “benefit” – CT vs. MA vs. NY?
o Tiering rule for services
June 28, 2017 65
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Case Study #3 Facts
o ABC Partnership is a CT based service business with offices in CT
and NY
o ABC has clients all over the country and visits each client for
meetings/presentations
o Filed returns in CT and NY only
o NY apportionment was not correct
Result
o Nexus study identified 2 states with most risk
o VDA’s in 2 states
o Amend partners’ home state returns for credit for taxes paid
Risks?
o Credit for taxes paid
June 28, 2017 66
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care – sales tax?
• Do I owe tax? Is product or service taxable?
If taxable, is it an exempt sale
o Sale for resale
o Exempt buyer
Selling TPP
Selling services
o Software
o SaaS
June 28, 2017 67
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care – property tax??
• Do I owe tax? Most states impose tax on business personal property
A number of states impose tax on inventory
o Alaska
o Arkansas
o Georgia
o Kentucky
o Louisiana
o Mississippi
o Oklahoma
o Texas
o Virginia
o Vermont
o West Virginia
June 28, 2017 68
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (continued)
• Question 2: Do I care – employment taxes??
• Employee classification
• Traveling employees
June 28, 2017 69
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
DOING BUSINESS CONSIDERATIONS (concluded)
• Question 2: Do I care – other taxes??
June 28, 2017
State What’s taxable? Rate Other
Delaware Goods & services .1006% - .7543% $100,000 monthly exclusion
Hawaii GET Goods & services .015%-4.5%
Nevada
Commerce Tax Goods & services .051% - .331% $4m threshold
New Mexico Goods & services 5.125% - 8.8675%
Ohio (CAT) Goods & services .26%
Tennessee Business Tax
Goods & services
0005%-.001875% $10,000 threshold
Washington B&O Tax
Goods & services .0474%-1.5% $267,000 threshold for wholesaling and services
70
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
Pass-thru Considerations
• Corporate Income Tax and Personal Income Tax rules
may vary within a state
June 28, 2017 71
States with different CIT & PIT
Apportionment Rules (2016)
Arizona New Jersey
Arkansas New York
Connecticut Ohio
Delaware Oklahoma
Hawaii Pennsylvania
Maryland Rhode Island
Michigan
A N O V E R V I E W O F S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X C O N C E P T S
Pass-Through Entity Considerations (continued)
• Withholding & Composite Returns
• AL – Certain PTE are exempt from composite
withholding
Tiered structures may exempt a tier from withholding
requirements if they request approval 30 days before original
due date
• CA – Withholding is on distributions not on income
• NJ – Composite return rate of 8.97% which matches
top PIT rate
• CT vs. NY: Withholding Timing Issue
• NY requires estimated withholding while CT does not
June 28, 2017 72
M A N A G I N G Y O U R S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X R I S K S
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW:
• Understand your tax profile Where are your customers?
Where do you have a physical presence?
o Need to identify third parties establishing a physical presence on
your behalf
• Determine where you have nexus If you find that you have nexus, that means that you have a filing
obligation. It does not mean that you owe tax
June 28, 2017 73
M A N A G I N G Y O U R S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X R I S K S
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW (concluded)
• Determine your potential taxes due Understand the rules in the states in which you have significant
customers
Do you owe tax? If yes:
o How much?
o For how many tax years has the exposure existed?
o What should we do?
• Every year do a “nexus review”
• Exemption certificates
June 28, 2017 74
M A N A G I N G Y O U R S TAT E & L O C A L
TA X R I S K S
MULTI-STATE BUSINESSES: STATE TAX RISKS
• Sales (and gross-receipt) taxes
• Income tax
• Withholding taxes
• Property tax (some states tax inventory)
• Other Local taxes: LA, Philly, San Francisco, NYC
NYC: Commercial Rent Tax
Unclaimed property
June 28, 2017 75
June 28, 2017
QUESTIONS??
O p e n D i s c u s s i o n :
76
Patrick J. Duffany, Partner
(959) 200-7270
Cindy R. Galamgam, Senior Manager
(959) 200-7239
Coral Bernier, Senior Manager
(959) 200-7155
C O N TA C T I N F O R M AT I O N
June 28, 2017 77