Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
IJSRD - International Journal for Scientific Research & Development| Vol. 5, Issue 03, 2017 | ISSN (online): 2321-0613
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 685
Finite Element Analysis and Design of Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder Desai Ajaykumar J1 Nihil Sorathia2 Hiren G. Desai3
1PG Student 2Assistant Professor 3Structural Consultant 2Department of Civil Engineering
1,2Parul University, Vadodara 3Sai Consultant, Surat
Abstract— A Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder is utilized to
transfer point load of column from the above stories and
transfer them to the supporting column. Transfer girder gives
great engineering stylish view to the tall structure. Behavior
and design of transfer girder is extremely unusual contrast
with ordinary beam, so it is important to concentrate the
behavior and design of the transfer girder in detail. To
understand the same in the present review, G+10 story
building is basically modeled in which the columns are float
at various levels. The analysis and design of transfer girder
considering dynamic loading i.e. seismic load is done in
ADAPT Builder. Five unique cases are considered with the
end goal of examining the behavior of transfer girder. The
behavior of transfer girder is contemplated by considering the
adjustment in the position of transfer girder in working in
plan and the different location of shear wall. The five
fundamentally unique building is displayed in ETABS and
behavior of the transfer girder is examined. The entire
behavior of the post-tensioned transfer girder is contemplated
by doing construction stage analysis in ETABS. Additionally
the construction stage analysis is done for every one of the
five cases in ETABS. To the extent analysis is concerned, the
column is regularly accepted pinned at the base and is
consequently taken as a point load on the transfer girder.
Additionally the impact of transfer girder on the above
structure is concentrated under gravity and lateral load. The
final design of the transfer girder will done in ADAPT
Builder.
Key words: Post-tensioned, Floating Column, Seismic,
ADAPT Builder
I. INTRODUCTION
In tall building column is stopped at ground and first floor
level to encourage bigger opening at ground level to make get
to agreeable to people in general zone at the base. In 1950's
and 1960's, some Europe researchers proposed the soft base
level to achieve the substantial openings at the base level. A
frame is constructed at base level to support the upper
structure in this kind of structure. It is viewed as that this kind
of structure has better performance during earthquake,
however as indicated by the present encounters, it has been
demonstrated that the idea isn't right. In 1978, numerous this
kind of building fell during the Romania quake.
A column should be a vertical part beginning from
foundation level and exchanging the load to the ground. The
term floating column is additionally a vertical component
which closes at lower level (end level) of the building because
of structural prerequisite and its lay on beam. The beams
thusly exchange the load to different columns below it.
Practically speaking, the genuine columns below the end
level [usually the stilt level] are not constructed with care and
more at risk to disappointment.
These days bigger opening at the ground floor level
is accomplished by utilization of transfer girder to collect the
vertical and parallel load from the elevated structure part and
then distribute them to the broadly separated column.
However in the analysis of the transfer girder, thought of the
impact of intelligent drive in the general examination is past
the scope of the advancement of straightforward and
approximate and requires appropriate modeling in mind the
end goal to have greater understanding the structural behavior
and analysis.
II. MODELLING
A. Problem Definition
For the purpose of understanding behaviour and design of
Post-tensioned transfer girder ETABS 2016 software is
utilized. In order to get correct result from the software the
correct modelling of structure must be required. To validate
the present work with software, following problem of book is
taken in order to compare the analysis result given by
software with the analytical result.
B. Different models
Fig. 1: Configuration for case-1
Fig. 2: Configuration for case-2
Finite Element Analysis and Design of Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/179)
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 686
Fig. 3: Configuration for case-3
Fig. 4: Configuration for case-4
Fig. 5: Configuration for case-5
Grade of Concrete Fck = 25 N/mm²
Grade of Steel Fy = 500 N/mm²
Density of Concrete 𝛾c = 25 kN/m³
Density of Brick wall 𝛾 = 20 kN/m³
Table 1: Material Specifications
Earthquake zone III
Importance factor 1
Response reduction factor 5
Wall load 11.04 kN/m
Parapet wall load 4.6 kN/m
Typical floor live load 3 kN/m
Terrace love load 1.5 kN/m
Typical floor Super dead 2 kN/m
Floor finish 1 kN/m
Table 2: Loading
Table 3: Columns for the Position
All beams having size of 230 mm x 375 mm are passed in
analysis result of ETABS.
– All slabs are having the depth of 150 mm in all cases.
– Thickness of Shear wall provided in the case-2, case-4
and case-5 is of 180 mm.
– Column sizes for case-1 and case-2 is same and is given
in Table
– Column sizes for case-3, case-4 and case-5 are same and
is given in Table
Finite Element Analysis and Design of Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/179)
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 687
C. Results and Discussion
1) Comparison between Construction Stage & Conventional
Analysis
Fig. 6: Bending Moment in Transfer Girder for case-1
Fig. 7: Shear force in transfer Girder for case-1
The maximum positive and negative bending moments are
linearly increasing as construction stage increases. The
maximum positive bending moment in transfer girder (case-
1) is 5% more when construction stage analysis is used
compare to conventional analysis. The shear forces at support
and at floating column are linearly increasing as construction
stage increases. The maximum shear force in transfer girder
(case-1) is 3% more when construction stage analysis is used
compare to conventional analysis. The maximum deflection
in transfer girder (case-1) is 5% more when construction stage
analysis is used compare to conventional analysis.
Fig. 8: Bending Moment in Transfer Girder for case-2
Fig. 9: Shear force in transfer Girder for case-2
The maximum positive and negative bending
moments are linearly increasing as construction stage
increases. The maximum positive bending moment in transfer
girder (case-2) is 5% more when construction stage analysis
is used compare to conventional analysis. The shear forces at
support and at floating column are linearly increasing as
construction stage increases. The maximum shear force in
transfer girder (case-2) is 3% more when construction stage
analysis is used compare to conventional analysis. The
maximum deflection in transfer girder (case-2) is 5% more
when construction stage analysis is used compare to
conventional analysis.
Fig. 10: Bending Moment in Transfer Girder for case-3
Fig. 11: Shear force in transfer Girder for case-3
The maximum positive and negative bending
moments are linearly increasing as construction stage
increases. The maximum positive bending moment in transfer
girder (case-3) is 5% more when construction stage analysis
is used compare to conventional analysis. The shear forces at
Finite Element Analysis and Design of Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/179)
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 688
support and at floating column are linearly increasing as
construction stage increases. The maximum shear force in
transfer girder (case-3) is 3% more when construction stage
analysis is used compare to conventional analysis. The
maximum deflection in transfer girder (case-3) is 5% more
when construction stage analysis is used compare to
conventional analysis.
Fig. 12: Bending Moment in Transfer Girder for case-4
Fig. 13: Shear force in transfer Girder for case-4
The maximum positive and negative bending
moments are linearly increasing as construction stage
increases. The maximum positive bending moment in transfer
girder (case-4) is 5% more when construction stage analysis
is used compare to conventional analysis. The shear forces at
support and at floating column are linearly increasing as
construction stage increases. The maximum shear force in
transfer girder (case-4) is 3% more when construction stage
analysis is used compare to conventional analysis. The
maximum deflection in transfer girder (case-4) is 5% more
when construction stage analysis is used compare to
conventional analysis.
Fig. 14: Bending Moment in Transfer Girder for case-5
Fig. 15: Shear force in transfer Girder for case-5
The maximum positive and negative bending
moments are linearly increasing as construction stage
increases. The maximum positive bending moment in transfer
girder (case-5) is 5% more when construction stage analysis
is used compare to conventional analysis. The shear forces at
support and at floating column are linearly increasing as
construction stage increases. The maximum shear force in
transfer girder (case-5) is 3% more when construction stage
analysis is used compare to conventional analysis. The
maximum deflection in transfer girder (case-5) is 5% more
when construction stage analysis is used compare to
conventional analysis.
III. CONCLUSION
1) Construction stage analysis in structure is important to
improve the analysis accuracy in terms of displacement,
axial force, bending moment and shear force in transfer
girder and column near of it and also for structure as a
whole.
2) Bending moment and shear force in transfer girder are
higher in construction stage analysis which must be
consider in design phase for avoiding cracking of the
beam and column due to sequence effect.
3) In case of displacement, structure analyzed utilizing
construction stage analysis indicates considerable larger
displacement which is reality in comparison to
conventional analysis in which structure is
conceptualized as entire and loaded at the same time after
construction which is not reality.
4) The provision of shear wall improves the behavior of
transfer girder under earthquake load.
5) The maximum reduction in bending moment is about
85% due to the provision of the shear wall under
earthquake load.
6) The beam above the transfer girder shows drastic change
in flexural behavior as we construct the floor stage wise,
it changes from hogging to ultimately sagging which
should be taken care while designing the beams above
the transfer girder.
7) In conventional analysis, this flexural behavior change is
not getting reflected and it may result into the flexural
cracking, if beams are designed considering
conventional analysis only.
8) The transfer girder must be design as partially
prestressed member to get acceptable depth of girder
rather than fully prestressed member.
Finite Element Analysis and Design of Post-Tensioned Transfer Girder
(IJSRD/Vol. 5/Issue 03/2017/179)
All rights reserved by www.ijsrd.com 689
REFERENCES
[1] Chris, G. and Constantin, E. (2013) “Design of partially
prestressed concrete beam based on cracking control
provision” Engineering Structures 48, pp. 402–416.
[2] Devashree, U., Salunke, P. and Sayagavi, V. (2014)
“Cost optimization of post-tensioned I girder”
International Journal of Students Research in
Technology & Management, Vol.2 (01), Jan –Feb,
ISSN 2321-2543, and pp. 14-18.
[3] Edward, G., Christopher, B. and Yook-Kong, Y (1986)
“Anchorage zone stresses of beams subjected to shear
force” J. Struct. Eng. no. 113, pp.1789-1805.
[4] Eric, skibbe (2010) “A Comparison of Design using
Strut-And-Tie of Modelling and Deep Beam Method for
Transfer Girders in Building Structures ”B.S, Kansas
State University.
[5] Elif A. (2010) “Transfer and development length of
strands in post-tensioned members after anchor head
failure” M.sc Thesis, University of Central Florida.
[6] Jacques, E J. (1971) "Study of long-span prestressed
concrete bridge girders." J. Prestressed Concrete Inst.,
pp. 24-42.
[7] Kaung, J. And Puvvala, J. (1996) “The Behaviour and
failure of wall beams in tall building” Proc. Of 2nd Int.
Conf. Multi-Purpose High-Rise Towers and Tall
buildings, Singapore, pp. 139-143.
[8] Michael S., Zenon A., and Abdolrahim N. (1989)” Pre-
tensioned and Post-tensioned composite girders”
Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 115, No. 12,
December, pp. 3142-3153.