Fine Tuning WebFOCUS for the IBM Mainframe (zSeries, System z9)

Mark Nesson

June, 2008

Fine Tuning WebFOCUS for the IBM Mainframe (zSeries, System z9)

Copyright 2007, Information Builders. Slide 2

Why WebFOCUS for z

Runs natively on MVS, Linux IBM has brand new specialty engines you can take advantage

ofAbility to create partitions on z to centralize business

intelligence on a single server – where the databases and applications reside


Information Builders products used in benchmark

WebFOCUS iWay Software

iWay Service Manager, is a unique and powerful Enterprise Service Bus (ESB) that invoked as Web services to provide event-driven integration and B2B interaction management.


There’s an easier way!

`

RDBMS

HTTP Clients Web ServerApp Server/

Servlet ContainerReporting

Server

RCRepository

RC DistributionServer RDBMS

DBServers

ibi_html

ibi_bid

approot

ibi_apps

rcaster

basedir

worp

adapters

focexecs

synonym

data

reports

HTTP/HTTPS

HTTP/HTTPS/

Proprietary

TCP

HTTP/HTTPS TCP/JDBC

TCP/ JDBC

TCP via Client Driver

or JDBC

TCP/JDBC


Benchmark Objectives

Test WebFOCUS, on the proven strengths of System z hardware running the Linux open source OS with UDB, and z/OS with DB2.

Evaluate the scalability and performance of WebFOCUS and iWay Service Manager in all operating systems environment on IBM z Server and the benefit of using various specialty engines on IBM z server.

All test configurations accurately and faithfully replicated prior benchmarks run on other UNIX and Windows platforms.

Test results therefore represent the true performance of WebFOCUS workload on that hardware vendor machine.

Testing was done at IBM Gaithersburg (Washington Systems Center) in November of 2006 by a combined team from IBM and Information Builders.


UDB and DB2 database size

Linux system IBILIN03 under zVM and z/OS system IBI1 are used in the various benchmark configurations to host the test databases.

Two databases are defined on IBILIN03 and IBI1 With multiple tables defined to each database

2 million rows of data 7 million rows of data

Each row is 256 bytes long.


Benchmark Test Workload used

Workload-small: Query to retrieve 61 rows of data Workload-large: Query to retrieve 3000 rows of data Workload-complex: CPU intensive query, involves 4 table

join retrieve 5118 rows


How IBI tests were measured

For each given test configuration, Information Builders used the same parameter settings, i.e. interval time, keep alive time, to run small, large and complex workload by varying the concurrent active user numbers, then measure the end to end user response time.


Test Environment – 1 (all on Linux)

IBI WebFocus Network and Data Traffic Flow on z9using 3 SuSE SLES9 Linux guests under zVM

z/VM 5.22 CPU assigned plus 14 optional8 GB of Memory & xxGB Xstore

GB Ethernet

3.0 GHz 8way 3.0 GHz 8way

Workstations

Linux 2/4 CP,2/4 GB

SuSE SLES 9 64 bitWAS 6.0.1.13+

Linux 2/4/8 CP,2 GB

SuSE SLES 9

Linux 2/4 CP,2GB

SuSE SLES 9

Hostname: IBILIN01 Hostname; IBILIN02 Hostname; IBILIN03

WebFocus Client 7.6 WebFocus Reporting Server 7.6DB2 Connect 8.2

iWay Service Manager 5.5

UDB 8.2 fixpack 13

11/14/2006

OSAsubchannel


Test Environment – 1(Linux) Scenarios

Scenario1: IBILIN02: 2/4/8 CP, 2 GB, WebFOCUS 7.6 Reporting Server, DB2

Connect IBILIN03: 2/4 CP, 2 GB, UDB 8.2

Scenario2: IBILIN01: 2/4 CP, 2/4 GB, WAS 6.0.2.17, WebFOCUS Client 7.6 IBILIN02: 2/4/8 CP, 2 GB, WebFOCUS 7.6 Reporting Server, DB2

Connect IBILIN03: 2/4 CP, 2 GB, UDB 8.2

Scenario3: IBILIN02: 2/4/8 CP, 2 GB, iWay Service Manager, DB2 JDBC type

4 IBILIN03: 2/4 CP, 2 GB, UDB 8.2


Test Env. – 1 (Linux), Scenario – 1(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, Workload-small)

# user

Response Time in seconds

2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

0.616

1.205

2.388

3.726

0.407

0.435

0.793

Small

1.946

-----

0.223

1.321

-----

Small

Small

Small


Filters and Specs:

Operating System:SUSE SLES 9 z/VM 5.2

Memory:2 GB

RDBMS DB2

Rows Returned: 61

Number of CPUS: 2, 4, 8

Protocol: TCP

Access Method: CLI

Concurrent Users: 10, 25, 50, 75, 100, 200, 500

Keep Alive:60 Interval:.05

WebFOCUS 7.6 Performance Statistics for z-Linux Average Request Processing Time (in seconds)

Across Number of CPUs by Concurrent Users


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 1 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, Workload-small)

Test 1 Scenario 1 Small

0

1

2

3

4

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env.– 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 1(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-large)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

1.829

3.529

6.095

17.032

0.941

1.867

3.323

Large

5.487

-----

1.013

6.883**

-----

Large

Large

Large

** Linux system swap occurred


Filters and Specs:


Memory:2 GB

RDBMS DB2

Rows Returned: 3000


Protocol: TCP

Access Method: CLI






Test Env.– 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 1 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, Workload-Large)

Test 1 Scenario 1 Large

0

5

10

15

20

50 100 200 500

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 1 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-Complex)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

10

25

50

100

Workload Type

4.676

11.295

24.443

40.467

3.133

5.813

11.333

Complex

25.175

-----

-----

14.92

8.963

Complex

Complex

Complex

200 80.928 60.784 ----- Complex


Filters and Specs:


Memory:2 GB

CPU Speed:550 Mips

Rows Returned: 5118


Protocol: TCP

Access Method: CLI






Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 1 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-Complex)

Test 1 Scenario 1 Complex

0

20

40

60

80

100

10 25 50 100 200

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-small)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

0.799

1.378

2.594

5.417

-----

0.798

-----

Small

3.659**

-----

0.624

2.065

-----

Small

Small

Small

** Switched to use JLINK


Filters and Specs:


Memory:2 GB

Rows Returned: 61


Protocol: SERVLET

Access Method: CLI



Average Request Processing Time (in seconds)Across Number of CPUs by Concurrent Users


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2 (WAS, Web FOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-small)


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

50 100 200 500

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2(WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-large)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

1.913

3.702

7.279

14.966

-----

2.45

-----

Large

11.857**

-----

-----

----

-----

Large

Large

Large

** switched to use JLINK




Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2(WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-large)


02468

10121416

50 100 200 500

Users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e (

Se

cs

)

2 CP

4 CP


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-Complex)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

10

25

50

75

Workload Type

11.578

28.438

-----

-----

2.151

5.047

10.826

Complex

15.312

-----

-----

-----

7.121

Complex

Complex

Complex

100 ----- 19.791 14.056 Complex


Average Request Processing Time (in seconds)



Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2 Connect, WL-Complex)


0

5

10

15

20

25

30

10 25 50 75 100

Users

Res

po

nse

Tim

e (s

ecs)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 3(iWay Service Manager, DB2 JDBC Type 4, WL-Small)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

1.731

3.707

7.59

11.799

0.95*

1.796*

3.451*

Small

6.255*

0.734*

1.221*

4.71*

2.62*

Small

Small

Small

500 18.333 9.807* 7.34* Small

* JVM size 1024 MB




Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 3(iWay Service Manager, DB2 JDBC type 4, WL-Small)


0

5

10

15

20

25 50 100 200 500

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 3(iWay Service Manager, DB2 JDBC type 4, WL-Large)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

81.522

188.558

369.617*

-----

44.842*

90.319*

235.208*

Large

-----

32.34*

74.42*

-----

182.265*

Large

Large

Large

500 ----- ----- ----- Large

* JVM size 1024 MB.




Test Env. – 1 (all on Linux), Scenario – 3(iWay Service Manager, DB2 JDBC type 4, WL-Large)


0

100

200

300

400

25 50 100

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Benchmark Test Environment – 2(App and driver on Linux, DB on z/OS)

IBI WebFocus Network and Data Traffic Flow on z9using Linux under zVM and z/OS system

GB Ethernet


Workstations

IBILIN02Linux SuSE SLES9

2/4/8 CP,8 GB

WAS 6.0.1.13

z/OS 1.7 8 CP,8 GB

Hostname:IBI_VM

Hostname: IBI1

WebFocus ReportingServer 7.6

iWay Service Manager5.5

DB2 V 8.2

11/16/2006

OSAsubchannel

OSAsubchannel

LPAR 1 LPAR 2


Benchmark Test Environment – 2Scenarios

Scenario1: IBILIN02: 2/4/8 CP, 2 GB, WebFOCUS Reporting Server

7.6, DB2 Connect, Native Data Driver (CLI) (z/OS) IBI1: 8 CP, 8 GB, DB2, 2 tables


Test Env. – 2, Scenario – 1(App on Linux, DB on z/OS)

# userResponse Time in seconds

2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

0.896

1.78

3.276

5.166

0.444

0.875

1.885

Small

2.807

0.214

0.435

1.50

0.721

Small

Small

Small

(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2, WL=Small)


Average Request Processing Time (in seconds)




(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2, WL=Small)


0

1

2

3

4

5

6

50 100 200 500

Users

Res

po

nse

Tim

e (S

ecs)

2 CP

4 CP

8 CP




2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

50

100

200

500

Workload Type

18.417

33.183

49.23

----

9.812

17.145

34.74

Large

----

4.998

10.278

----

18.369

Large

Large

Large

(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2, WL=Large)





(WebFOCUS Reporting Server, DB2, WL=Large)

Test 2 Scenario 1 large

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

50 100 200

Users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e (

Se

cs

)

2 CP

4 CP

8 CP


Benchmark Test Environment – 3(WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, iWay Service Manager – IBI2, DB on z/OS –IBI1)

IBI WebFocus Network and Data Traffic Flow on z9using 2 separate z/OS systems

GB Ethernet


Workstations

z/OS 1.7 2/4/8 CP,8 GB

WAS 6.1

z/OS 1.7 2/4/8 CP,8 GB

Hostname: IBI2 Hostname: IBI1

WebFocus Client 76iWay Service Manager

5.5JDBC Type 4 driver

DB2 V 8.2

11/16/2006

OSAsubchannel

OSAsubchannel

LPAR 1 LPAR 2


Benchmark Test Environment – 3 Scenarios

Scenario1: IBI2: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, ISM 5.5, JDBC Type-4 Driver. IBI1: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, DB2, 2 tables

Scenario2: IBI2: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, WAS 6.1, WebFOCUS Reporting Server 76, WF

Client, CLI. IBI1: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, DB2, 6 tables IBI2 communicates with IBI1 via Hipersocket 1 zIIP engine

Scenario3: IBI2: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, WebFOCUS Reporting Server 76, CLI IBI1: 2/4/8 CP, 8 GB, DB2, 6 tables IBI2 communicates with IBI1 via Hipersocket 1 zIIP engine


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 1 (ISM, JDBC Type4, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

2.032

3.22

6.782

15.34

0.716

1.329

2.715

Small

5.864

0.56

1.11

5.2

2.4

Small

Small

Small

500 22.54 7.54 6.391 Small




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 1 (ISM, JDBC Type4, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)


0

5

10

15

20

25

25 50 100 200 500

Users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e (

Se

cs

)

2 CP

4 CP

8 CP


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 1 (ISM, JDBC Type4, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

58.95

121.98

292.22

-----

39.179

80.675

210.811

Large

-----

35.0

74.17

-----

181.3

Large

Large

Large

500 ----- ----- ----- Large


Average Request Processing Time (in seconds) Across Number of CPUs by Concurrent Users


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 1 (ISM, JDBC Type4, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)


0

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

25 50 100

Users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e (

Se

cs

)

2 CP

4 CP

8 CP


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

3.639

4.616

9.224

-----

-----

-----

Small

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

Small

Small

Small

500 21.20 ----- ----- Small

* 4 Clustered WAS Application Servers




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)


0

5

10

15

20

25

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

6.353

11.756

22.226

-----

-----

-----

Large

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

Large

Large

Large

500 35.249 ----- ----- Large




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 2 (WAS, WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)


0

10

20

30

40

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

0.566

1.118

2.207

-----

0.313

0.65

Small

1.377

-----

0.14

0.749

0.278

Small

Small

Small

500 7.786 5.413 1.847 Small




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Small, 1 zIIP)


0123456789

50 100 200 500

Users

Res

po

nse

Tim

e (S

ecs)

2 CP

4 CP

8 CP


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

5.575

9.615

18.874

-----

3.001

6.756

Large

12.159

-----

1.755

4.824

3.674

Large

Large

Large

500 33.525 27.501 7.582 Large




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Large, 1 zIIP)


05

10152025303540

50 100 200 500

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

2 CPs

4 CPs

8 CPs


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Complex, 1 zIIP)

# user


2 cp 4 cp 8 cp

25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

-----

Complex

-----

-----

21.084

82.053*

42.295

Complex

Complex

Complex

500 ----- ----- 167.605* Complex

* RMF report indicated that 1 zIIP engine utilization was at 100%




Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3 (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Complex, 1 zIIP)


0

50

100

150

200

0 100 200 300 400 500 600

Users

Res

pons

e Ti

me

(sec

s)

8 CPs


Proven Value of zIIP Specialty Engine

06/11/17 01:04 Thread Summary ROW 85 TO 107 OF 148 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Display Filter View Print Options Help ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SDSF DA IBI1 IBI1 PAG 0 CPU/L 100/100 LINE 1-5 (5) COMMAND INPUT ===> SCROLL ===> CSR PREFIX=DSN* DEST=(ALL) OWNER=* SYSNAME= NP JOBNAME SP ASIDX Real Paging SPAG SCPU% ECPU-Time ECPU% SzIIP% Racf Id DSN8MSTR 1 004D 3683 0.00 0 100 18.30 0.00 100 DB2USER DSN8DIST 1 004F 11T 0.00 0 100 3590.05 95.80 100 DB2USER DSN8IRLM 1 0050 1266 0.00 0 100 5.51 0.08 100 DB2USER DSN8DBM1 1 0052 263T 0.00 0 100 349.40 1.66 100 DB2USER DSN8SPAS 1 0053 1184 0.00 0 100 0.15 0.00 100 DB2USER

06/11/17 01:14 Thread Summary ROW 1 TO 23 OF 201 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Display Filter View Print Options Help ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- SDSF DA IBI1 IBI1 PAG 0 CPU/L 100/100 LINE 1-5 (5) COMMAND INPUT ===> SCROLL ===> CSR PREFIX=DSN* DEST=(ALL) OWNER=* SYSNAME= NP JOBNAME SP ASIDX Real Paging SPAG SCPU% ECPU-Time ECPU% SzIIP% Racf Id DSN8MSTR 1 004D 3683 0.00 0 100 18.42 0.01 100 DB2USER DSN8DIST 1 004F 12T 0.00 0 100 6366.16 95.70 100 DB2USER DSN8IRLM 1 0050 1271 0.00 0 100 6.75 0.03 100 DB2USER DSN8DBM1 1 0052 416T 0.00 0 100 401.31 3.36 100 DB2USER DSN8SPAS 1 0053 1184 0.00 0 100 0.15 0.00 100 DB2USER


zIIP Actual Versus Projected

CP configuration: IBI1 - 8 CPs, 1 zIIP IBI2 - 8 CPs, 0 zIIP

WebFOCUS Large ------------- IBI1 ------------- ---- IBI2 ---- Users Time CPU% zIIP% IIPCP I/O Rate CPU% I/O Rate 50 00:45 3.2 14.04 0.94 11.1 71.3 2548 100 00:49 3.1 14.03 0.78 10.2 74.5 3651 200 00:53 3.6 16.86 1.21 10.8 85.3 2506 500 00:58 3.3 14.64 0.87 10.3 76.4 3437

Complex Query ------------- IBI1 ------------- ---- IBI2 ---- Users Time CPU% zIIP% IIPCP I/O Rate CPU% I/O Rate 50 01:05 84.3 90.22 290.43 1159 53.8 180.2 100 01:10 97.8 95.33 336.71 1941 51.0 200.0 200 01:16 92.0 93.20 305.94 2697 63.1 247.5 500 01:23 100.0 95.51 337.83 3117 48.5 111.1


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS), Scenario – 3b (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Complex, 8CP,Vary zIIPs)


25

50

100

200

Workload Type

-----

44.095

94.362

-----

21.084

Complex

82.053

-----

33.351

Complex

Complex

Complex

500 ----- ----- ------ Complex

-----

18.814

79.838

-----

NO zIIP 1 zIIP 3 zIIP 6 zIIP

22.105

42.295 37.786

17.413

68.262


Test Env – 3 (2 separate z/OS),Scenario – 3b (WebFOCUS Reporting Server, CLI, WL=Complex, 8 CP. Vary zIIPs)

0

20

40

60

80

100

0 50 100 150 200 250

Users

Re

sp

on

se

Tim

e(s

ec

)

NO zIIP

1 zIIP

3 zIIP

6 zIIP


WSC Benchmark Team

Mary Hu John BishopRichard Lewis Joe Consorti Jennie Liang John GoodyearKenneth HainGlenn MateriaDennis McDonald


Questions ?


Appendix A

Workload-Small Query

SELECT T1."F3SSN",T1."F3ALPHA10",T1."F3INTEGER5",

T1."F3FLOAT9X8",T1."F3DBL15X2"

FROM TST2MLN T1

WHERE (T1."F3SSN" <= '000000061') FOR FETCH ONLY;


Appendix A

Workload-Large Query

SELECT T1."F3SSN",T1."F3ALPHA10",T1."F3INTEGER5",

T1."F3FLOAT9X8",T1."F3DBL15X2"

FROM TST2MLN T1

WHERE (T1."F3SSN" <= '000003000') FOR FETCH ONLY;


Appendix A

Workload-Complex Query

SELECT T1."M_MKTING_NBR",T1."M_TRIP",T1."M_STAT", T1."M_VISIT_POINTER",T4."M_C_USE",T4."M_C_CONC_CD", T4."EFFECT_DATE",T4."EXPIRE_DATE", MAX(T1."TRIP_CODE"), MAX(T3."TRIP_NAME"), MAX(T1."M_DELVRY_DATE"), MAX(T1."DELVRY_YEAR"), SUM(T4."CUSTOMER_COUNT") FROM ( ( ( MKTING_GLOBAL T1 INNER JOIN TRIP_GLOBAL T2 ON T2."VYD_TRIP" = T1."M_TRIP" ) LEFT OUTER JOIN TRANSPORT_NAME_GLOBAL T3 ON T3."TRANSPORT_CODE" = T1."TRANSPORT_CODE" ) INNER JOIN MKTING_CUSTMR_SURVEY T4 ON T4."M_MKTING_NBR" = T1."M_MKTING_NBR" AND T4."M_TRIP" =

T1."M_TRIP" ) WHERE (T1."BUSS_CODE" = 'A') AND (T2."VYD_TRIP_STAT" IN('A', 'H')) AND (T2."REPORT_YEAR" ='2006') AND (T4."EXPIRE_DATE" > '2007-02-17') AND (T4."EFFECT_DATE" <= '2006-10-17') AND (T4."M_C_CUSTMR_STAT" = 'C') AND (((T1."M_GROUP_TYPE" ='H') AND (T4."M_C_CUSTMR_ID" = '2')) OR ((T1."M_GROUP_TYPE" <> 'H') OR T1."M_GROUP_TYPE" IS NULL)) GROUP BY T1."M_MKTING_NBR",T1."M_TRIP",T1."M_STAT",T1."M_VISIT_POINTER",T4."M_C_USE", T4."M_C_CONC_CD",T4."EFFECT_DATE",T4."EXPIRE_DATE" ORDER BY T1."M_MKTING_NBR",T1."M_TRIP",T1."M_STAT", T1."M_VISIT_POINTER",T4."M_C_USE",T4."M_C_CONC_CD", T4."EFFECT_DATE",T4."EXPIRE_DATE" FOR FETCH ONLY;

Documents

Fine Tuning WebFOCUS for the IBM Mainframe (zSeries, System z9)