15
Finding the Hidden Waste Understanding the hidden cost of poor packaging Barbara Ledbury Returnable Packaging Engineer Ingersoll Rand

Finding the Hidden Waste · 2017. 10. 4. · Returnable Packaging Engineer Ingersoll Rand. Ingersoll Rand advances the quality of life by creating comfortable, sustainable and efficient

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Finding the Hidden Waste Understanding the hidden cost of poor packaging

    Barbara Ledbury Returnable Packaging Engineer

    Ingersoll Rand

  • Ingersoll Rand advances the quality of life by creating comfortable, sustainable and efficient environments.

    Our people and our family of brands—including Club Car®, Ingersoll Rand®, Thermo King® and Trane®—work together to enhance the quality and comfort of air in homes and buildings; transport and protect food and perishables; and increase industrial productivity and efficiency.

  • Climate Commitment Climate Commitment

    Progress to Date

  • What is Packaging Waste?

    PRODUCT LIFE CYCLE

  • Types of Packaging

    • One-Way Packaging (OWP): disposable

    • Bespoke: special design

    • Standard: off the shelf

  • TIM WOOD vs CRUDE SAM Transport Inventory Motion Waiting Over

    Producing Over

    Processing Defects

    Removal / Recycle

    Damages Excess

    Handling Space Administration

    Control Maintenance

    C R U D E S A M

    Under-Utilization

    Cash/Capital outlay

  • Hidden Waste of Packaging

    One Way Packaging Supply Chain (OWP)

  • Reusable Packaging Supply Chain

    OEM Owned Packaging

  • Who is Engaged at Ingersoll Rand?

    SUPPLIERS Returnable packaging must meet their safety guidelines and processes

    LOGISTICS Help to determine cubic efficiencies, and reverse

    logistics of empty containers

    WAREHOUSE Repack, detrash, storage, safety

    ASSEMBLY Ergonomics, TAKT, quality

    FINANCE Evaluation of alternatives, budgeting, business

    case analysis

    EHS Ergo risk, solid waste impact study

    EVERYONE!

  • How to get started?

    Responsibility

    • SME

    • Team

    HIGHLOW

    SHO

    RT

    LON

    G

    Seasonal Demand Variation

    Tra

    nsp

    ort

    Dis

    tan

    ce

    Sup

    pli

    er

    to O

    EM

    RETURNABLE

    One-Way Packaging

    Strategy

    • Resources

    • Ownership

    Prioritize

    • New parts/suppliers

    • Local supplier

    • Repack Ops

  • How to Get Started with Cost – Total Cost of Ownership

    [CATEGORY NAME]

    [PERCENTAGE]

    [CATEGORY NAME]

    [PERCENTAGE]

    [CATEGORY NAME]

    [PERCENTAGE]

    [CATEGORY NAME]

    [PERCENTAGE]

    [CATEGORY NAME]

    [PERCENTAGE]

    [CATEGORY NAME] [PERCENT

    AGE]

    80% of the TCO of one-way packaging

    is not planned or budgeted for

  • Ingersoll Rand Packaging Strategy High Part Savings

    Solid Waste Savings

    Reduced Inventory Carrying Costs

    Complex PKG Designs

    Large System Size Required

    High Reverse Logistics Costs

    Low Container Turnover

    CO

    ST

    / E

    FF

    OR

    T

    PRODUCTIVITY / SAVINGS

    Med-Hi Part Savings

    Solid Waste Savings

    Reduced Inventory Carrying Costs

    Reduced Handling Costs

    Low Logistics Cost

    Low Management Costs

    High Container Turnover

    No Engineering

    HIGH

    HIG

    H

    LOW

    LOW

    Low Part Savings

    Low Solid Waste Savings

    Low Volume

    Low Reverse Logistics Costs

    Low Management Costs

    No Engineer Containers

    No Part Savings

    Low Volume Parts

    Slow Moving Inventory

    Low Turn Rates

    High Reverse Logistics Costs

    High Management Costs

    AX, BX

    AZ, BZ, CZ

    BZ, CY

    AY, BY, CX

    BESPOKE

    STANDARD

    ONE-WAY

    ONE-WAY

  • Bulkhead Story • 4 parts per crate

    • 411 shipments/

    year

    Sustainability Impact

    • 799 tons of wood = 17 acres of

    hardwood forest/year

    • Framing lumber = 566 2400 sq.ft.

    homes/year

    • If burned = 12 homes/year of electricity

    • 176 less trucks = 158 tons C02/year

    • 7 parts per crate

    • 235 shipments/year

    75%

    [VALUE]

    100%

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    Truck Density Trans Cost DM Cost

    Project Impact

    One-Way Bespoke Change

    Annual Savings $1.5M

    Solid Waste 799 tons

    C02 Reduction 158 tons

  • Thank You!

    Your opinion is important to us!

    Please take a moment to complete the survey using the conference mobile app.

    WS/43

    Finding the Hidden Waste

    Barbara Ledbury

    Ingersoll Rand

    [email protected]