Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    1/24

    The Financial Crisis ResponseIn ChartsApril 2012

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    2/24

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    3/24

    This recession was the worst since the Great Depression

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Bureau of Economic Analysis, Bureau of Labor Statistics, Federal Reserve Flow of Funds.

    Real GDP, percent fall from pre-recession peak

    -6%

    -5%

    -4%

    -3%

    -2%

    -1%

    0%

    Pre-recessionpeak

    1 2

    Years since pre-recession GDP peak

    2007 - 09 recession

    2001 recession

    1990 - 91 recession

    1981 - 82 recession

    1980 recession

    1974 recession

    = trough

    1Metrics of the 07 - 09 nancial crisis, peak-to-trough:

    8.8 million jobs lost

    $19.2 trillionlost household wealth

    (2011 dollars)

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    4/24

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    +0.5%

    +3.6%

    +3.0%

    +1.7%

    -1.8%

    +1.3%

    -3.7%

    -8.9%

    -6.7%

    -0.7%

    +1.7%

    +3.8% +3.9% +3.8%

    +2.5% +2.3%

    +0.4%+1.3%

    +1.8%

    +3.0%

    ChallengesReform

    The crisis response helped restart economic growth

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Bureau of Economic Analysis.

    2Real GDP growth, quarterly

    Jan. 20, 2009 President Obama

    takes of ce

    Feb. 2009 Financial Stability Plan announced

    Recovery Act signedHousing programs announced

    Mar. 3, 2009 TALF program launched to help

    revive credit markets

    Mar. 23, 2009 PPIP program announced to helprevive mortgage nance market

    May 7, 2009 Large bank stress test results released

    Apr. 2, 2009 G-20 nance ministers announcecoordinated response to globalnancial crisis

    Jun. 2009 First large banks repay TARP fundsGM restructuring

    Oct. 3, 2008

    TARP nancial stabilizationpackage enacted

    CostResponse

    Mar. 2008 Bear Stearns collapses

    Sept. 2008 Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac conservatorship

    Lehman Brothers bankruptcy

    AIG stabilization effort

    Jul. 7, 2008 FDIC intervenes

    in IndyMac Bank

    Dec. 12, 2007 Fed establishes rst liquidity

    facility and currency swap lines

    with other central banks

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    5/24

    2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    -

    2,000

    4,000

    6,000

    8,000

    10,000

    12,000

    14,000

    16,000

    -

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1,000

    1,200

    1,400

    1,600

    3 The crisis response paved the way for retirement savings to recover

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Federal Reserve Flow of Funds.

    S&P 500 index

    Retirement fund assets(billions of 2011 dollars)

    Jan. 20, 2009 President Obama

    takes of ce

    Feb. 2009 Financial Stability Plan announcedRecovery Act signed

    Housing programs announced

    Mar. 3, 2009 TALF program launched to help revive credit markets

    Mar. 23, 2009 PPIP program announced to help revive

    mortgage nance markets

    May 7, 2009 Large bank stress test results released

    Apr. 2, 2009 G-20 nance ministers announcecoordinated response to global

    nancial crisis

    Oct. 3, 2008 TARP nancial stabilization package passed

    Jun. 2009 First large banks repay TARP fundsGM restructuring

    Mar. 2008 Bear Stearns

    collapses

    Sept. 2008

    Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac conservatorshipLehman Brothers bankruptcy

    AIG stabilization effort

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    6/24

    2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011

    MoreMorebanksbanks

    tighteningtightening

    The crisis response helped unclog the credit pipes of thenancial system

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Federal Reserve Senior Loan Ofcer Opinion Survey, Treasury calculations.

    The crisis response helpedrestart the markets thatprovide nancing for auto,credit card, mortgage, andbusiness loans.

    For borrowers, it: Improved credit access Lowered borrowing

    costs.

    4

    Net percentage of banks easing lending standards, by loan type

    MoreMorebanksbankseasingeasing

    -100

    -80

    -60

    -40

    -20

    0

    20

    40

    Commercial and industrial lending

    Residential mortgages

    Consumer credit cards

    Jan. 20, 2009 President Obama

    takes of ce

    Feb. 2009 Financial Stability Plan announced

    Recovery Act passedHousing programs announced

    Mar. 3, 2009 TALF program launched

    Mar. 23, 2009 PPIP program announced to helprevive mortgage nance markets

    May 7, 2009 Large bank stress test results released

    Oct. 3, 2008 TARP enacted

    Jun. 2009 First large banks repay TARP funds

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    99%

    99%

    100%

    Credit cards

    Auto loans

    Agencymortgages

    How much has the price of creditrecovered since the crisis?As measured by the return of yields of asset- backed securities to their pre-crisis levels

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    7/24

    Financialmarkets

    Smallbusinesses

    Autos HousingRetirementConsumers

    Helped supportcompanies thatneed credit to hireand grow.

    Helped support acrucialmanufacturingindustry and saveAmerican jobs.

    Helped restartcredit markets andstabilize firms thathold deposits andprovide credit.

    Helped supportfamilies that needauto, credit card,and student loans.

    Helped protectsavers with 401(k)plans, moneymarket funds, andother investments.

    Helped supportAmericans seekingto obtain orrefinance amortgage, oravoid foreclosure.

    Small businessAutosFinancial marketsConsumersRetirementHousing

    What did it support?

    The crisis response helped support families and businesses

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Treasury, Ofce of Management and Budget.

    5ChallengesReformCostResponse

    The Treasury Department, the Federal Reserve, and other federal agencies attacked the crisis on multiple fronts so that families cotheir nancial needs and businesses could obtain the credit they need to hire and grow.

    This chart is intended to illustrate the breadth of the crisis response, but is not meant to be a complete depiction of all the actions taken by the government or th

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    8/24

    The crisis response helped stabilize the housing market

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Federal Reserve, HOPE NOW, Department of Housing and Urban Development.

    6Conventional 30-year mortgage ratesThe governments

    efforts helped keepmortgage rates low sothat Americans couldcontinue to buy homesand re nance in the wakeof the crisis.

    Since April 2009, loanmodi cation programshave helped millions of

    borrowers stay in theirhomes, more than thenumber who have losttheir homes to foreclosure.

    Cumulative foreclosures and permanent modi cations started*

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    * Cumulative HAMP permanent modi cations, FHA loss mitigation (such as modi cations, partial claims, and forbearance plans), and early delinquency interventions, plus proprietary modi cations completed as reported by the HOPE

    NOW Alliance. Some homeowners may be counted in more than one category. Foreclosure completions are properties entering Real Estate Owned (REO) as reported by Realty Trac. This does not include other loss mitigaunder Treasury housing programs or by the GSEs, such as forbearance plans, short sales, and second lien modi cations, which would increase the totals.

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    Apr '09 Jul '09 Oct '09 Jan '10 Apr '10 Jul '10 Oct '10 Jan '11 Apr '11 Jul '11 Oct '11 Jan '12

    Private

    modifications

    Since April 2009, there have been5 million permanent loan modifications

    Foreclosurecompletions

    2.6m

    HAMP modifications

    FHA loss mitigation

    6 million

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    Jan '08 Jul '08 Jan '09 Jul '09 Jan '10 Jul '10 Jan '11 Jul '11 Jan '12

    7 percent

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    9/24

    2.2

    2.3

    2.4

    2.5

    Jan2009 '10 '11 '12

    2.6m auto industry workers

    +231,000auto jobs since

    June 2009

    The crisis response saved the auto industry and one million American jobs

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Autodata.

    According toindependent estimates,

    the rescue of the autoindustry saved more thanone million American jobs.

    Since the rescue, theauto industry has added

    more than 230,000 jobs.The auto industry

    rescue is currentlyestimated to cost about$22 billion, but the cost

    of a disorderly liquidationto families and businessesacross the country thatrely on the auto industrywould have been far

    higher.

    7Auto-industry employment

    After June 2009 Post-restructuring of GM and Chrysler

    Mar. 2009 President Obama rejects restructuring plans fromGM and Chrysler, challenging them to developmore aggressive plans to return to viability.

    Sales of motor vehicles in the U.S.

    13m

    10m12m

    13m14.5m

    2008 2009 2010 2011 2012(annualizedaverage to

    date)

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    Ch llf

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    10/24

    The crisis response curbed the damage and helped restart the economy

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Treasury analysis based on OECD and U.S. Census data.

    8 Total civilian employment, percentage change from pre-crisis peak Jobs are returning.

    Despite the size of the

    nancial shock, thespeed and force of theresponse helped restore job growth more quicklythan in most other

    recent crises. There is still more

    work ahead, butbusinesses have...

    Added workers overthe last 25 straightmonths.

    Created 4.1 million jobs.

    U.S.Great Depression

    -30%

    -20%

    -10%

    0%

    +10%

    +20%

    Pre-crisispeak

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20

    Years since pre-crisis employment peak

    U.S.2008-09

    financial crisis

    Average of 5 most recentadvanced economy financial crises

    Spain 1974Norway 1986Finland 1989Sweden 1989Japan 1991

    Jobs growth resumed much fasterthan average of other recent nancialcrises in advanced economies

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    Ch llR fCR

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    11/24

    IMF March 2009 estimate of the costof U.S. response to 08-09 crisis

    12.7% of GDP($1.9 trillion in 2011$)

    Estimated total potential exposurefrom financial rescue

    $24 trillionSpecial Inspector General for TARP, July 2009

    U.S. pledges top

    $7.7 trillionto ease frozen credit

    Bloomberg November 24, 2008

    How much were the nancial stability programs expected to cost?

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: See Notes.

    9Projections of potential cost of nancial stability programs

    Bank bailout could cost

    $4 trillionCNNMoney.com

    January 27, 2009

    Fannie, Freddie bailoutcould cost taxpayers

    $1 trillionThe Christian Science Monitor

    June 18, 2010

    Estimated cost of TARP

    $356 billionCongressional Budget Office, March 2009

    Estimated cost of TARP

    $341 billionOffice of Management and Budget, August 2009

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    12/24

    ChallengesReformCostR

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    13/24

    The projected cost of TARP has fallen signicantly

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Treasury, Ofce of Management and Budget.

    The projected cost ofTARP has fallen signicantlyover the last three years.

    TARPs investmentprograms, together withTreasurys additional stake inAIG, are currently expectedto realize a positive returnfor taxpayers.

    The remainingprojected cost is primarilyattributable to support for

    struggling homeowners;these funds were notintended to be recovered.

    TARP programs havereceived three straight cleanaudits.**

    11Projections of TARP programs and additional Treasury AIG holdings, gain (cost)

    -$341b

    -$60b

    -$291b

    +$2b

    -400

    -350

    -300

    -250

    -200

    -150

    -100

    -50

    0

    50

    Aug. 2009Mid-session Review

    Feb. 2010President's Budget

    Feb. 2011President's Budget

    Feb. 2012President's Budget

    Apr. 2012estimate

    +$50 billion

    -$400 billion loss

    TARPoverall

    Investment programs only(excludes housing)*

    83%decrease in projected

    TARP costs sinceAug. '09

    POSITIVE RETURN

    LOSS

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    * This represents the TARP investment programs and includes Treasurys additional AIG common stock holdings valued as of February29, 2012. It excludes foreclosure prevention funds, which were not intended to be recovered ($46B).

    ** GAO annually reviews Treasury TARP cost estimates.

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    14/24

    The bank investment program helped stabilize thenancial system

    Source: Treasury.

    TARPs bank

    investment programshelped stabilize thenancial system by

    providing capital to morethan 700 banks

    throughout the country.More than 450 were

    small, community banks.

    Treasury is continuingto wind down thoseinvestments, which havealready realized asigni cant return fortaxpayers.

    12Returns as of April 12, 2012

    Federal Reserve regulatory minimum on stress tests

    -

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    Oct'08

    Apr'09

    Oct'09

    Apr'10

    Oct'10

    Apr'11

    Oct'11

    Apr'12

    $300 billion

    $245b

    Repayments$230b

    Realizedincome$34b

    Disbursed Recovered

    $264b

    Outstanding bank program investments, principal

    +$19bpositivereturn

    Note: About $2b of the funds invested in banks re nanced into the SBLF program. This

    re ects less than 1% of the total TARP funds invested in banks.

    A total of 348 banks remain in TARPs Capital Purchase Program and 82

    banks remain in TARPs Community Development Capital Initiative

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    15/24

    Max. commitmentMarch 2009

    Remaining Investment Outstanding Value of Remaining Stake

    76%of maximum committment

    returned or cancelled to date

    $44b

    $182b

    Current Value of RemainingGovernment Stake$49b

    Interest/ Fees/GainsRealized to Date$12b

    $61b

    Based on current marketprices, the government is

    expected to realize a gain onits AIG investment

    Remaining investment outstandingAs of March 2012

    Value of remaining stakeAs of March 2012

    The crisis response helped prevent the collapse of thenancial system and stabilized AIG

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Treasury, Federal Reserve.

    13Total commitment (Treasury and Federal Reserve), outstanding investment, and value of ownership stake in AIG,

    billions of dollars

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    16/24

    The nancial industry is less vulnerable to shocks than before the crisis

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Federal Reserve form Y-9C, Treasury calculations.

    Banks have added

    nearly $400 billion infresh capital as acushion againstunexpected losses andnancial shocks.

    Banks are also lessreliant on short-termfunding, which candisappear in a crisis andleave them morevulnerable to panics.

    14

    Federal Reserve regulatory minimum on stress tests

    Short-term wholesale funding as a percentof assets, 4 largest U.S. banks

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    30

    35

    40

    2002

    Q1

    '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

    40 percent

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    2002

    Q1

    '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

    Other Tier 1

    Tier 1 Common

    14 percent

    Capital in bank holding companies as a percentage of risk-weighted assets

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    17/24

    The U.S. banking system is proportionally smaller than that of other advanced economie

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: BankScope, IMF, Federal Reserve Flow of Funds.

    15Total assets of commercial banks, percent of GDP

    Total assets of 4 largest commercial banks, percent of GDP

    Even with theconsolidation of some of

    the weakest players duringthe crisis, the UnitedStates has... the least concentrated

    banking system of any

    major economy. the smallest banking

    system relative to thesize of its economy.

    The new legal tools

    established by the Dodd-Frank Act mean thatregulators will be betterable to dismantle andresolve large nancialinstitutions if necessary.

    Belgium

    Canada

    France

    GermanyItaly

    Japan

    Netherlands

    Sweden

    Switzerland

    United Kingdom

    United States

    0%

    100%

    200%

    300%

    400%

    500%

    600%

    0% 100% 200% 300% 400% 500% 600%

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    18/24

    The economy still has far to go to fully recover from thenancial crisis

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Bureau of Labor Statistics, Congressional Budget Ofce.

    Unemployment rate, percent of the labor force

    Real output gap

    Unemployment

    has fallen, but it stillremains high.

    Economic outputremains well belowits potential.

    16

    Long-termunemployment

    rate(27+ weeks)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    Jan2006

    '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12

    12 percent

    Unemploymentrate

    Recessions

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    '00 '01 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

    5.5%output gapin 2011Q4

    $15 trillion

    Real GDP(2005 dollars)

    Real potential GDP(2005 dollars)

    Recessions

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    19/24

    The longstanding nancial dif culties facing households persist

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Federal Reserve Flow of Funds, U.S. Census.

    Household debt, percent of disposable income

    Household debt is

    down relative to income,but a large overhang ofdebt remains.

    Median householdincome has declined

    over the last decade.

    17

    Real median household income

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100120

    140

    160

    1980Q1

    '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10

    160 percent

    Recessions

    40,000

    45,000

    50,000

    55,000

    60,000

    1967 '72 '77 '82 '87 '92 '97 '02 '07

    1999:$53,252

    $ 60,000

    2010:$49,445

    Recessions

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    20/24

    The housing market remains a challenge

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: U.S. Census.

    Inventory of vacant homes for sale only

    New single-family home sales

    Inventories of

    unsold homes aredeclining, but slowly.The overhang from thecrisis continues toweigh on prices.

    New home salesare stabilizing, but thehousing marketremains weak.

    18

    0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    Jan

    2003

    '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11 '12

    1.4 million Jul. 2005

    313,000 Feb. 2012

    1.6 million

    Recessions

    0

    0.5

    1.0

    1.5

    2.0

    2.5

    2004Q1

    '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

    2.5 millionRecessions

    gp

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    21/24

    Tax Cuts-$3,000b

    Other annualappropriations

    -$1,700b

    Iraq andAfghanistan-$1,400b

    Other-$600b

    MedicarePart D benefit

    -$300b

    December 2010tax deal-$250b

    Recovery Act-$800b

    Other-$410b

    The federal budget decit must be reduced to begin paying down debt

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURYSource: Treasury analysis of Congressional Budget Ofce data. See Notes for more details.

    19

    -8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    2001 '02 '03 '04 '05 '06 '07 '08 '09 '10 '11

    $8 trillion

    COSTS NOT DUETO LEGISLATION

    (technical &economic)

    Cost ofJanuary 2001 -January 2009

    policies

    Cost of post-January 2009

    policies

    29%

    59%

    12%

    In January 2001, CBO projectedcumulative surpluses wouldtotal $5.9 trillion through 2011.

    CUMULATIVESURPLUS

    CUMULATIVEDEFICIT

    Instead, cumulative deficitshave totaled$6.0 trillion.

    Post-January 2009Policies

    -$1.4 trillionthrough 2011

    Jan. 2001 - Jan. 2009Policies

    -$7 trillionthrough 2011

    gp

    Causes of the difference between projected and actual cumulative budget surpluses/de cits, scal years 2001 - 2011

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    22/24

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    23/24

    ChallengesReformCostResponse

  • 8/2/2019 Financial Crisis Response Report - April 2012

    24/24

    Notes

    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY

    Nnancial-stability/brieng-room/reports/105/

    Documents105/March%2012%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf

    Chart 13See the latest 105(a) report for further details on TARPcost estimates: http://www.treasury.gov/initiatives/nancial-stability/brieng-room/reports/105/

    Documents105/March%2012%20Report%20to%20Congress.pdf

    Chart 15Four largest U.S. banks by assets are JPMorgan Chase,Bank of America, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo.

    Chart 19Based on data from three annual CongressionalBudget Ofce publications: theBudget and Economic Outlook, the update to the Outlook , and CBOsestimate of the Presidents Budget. Technical andeconomic factors include all changes in decitprojections not due to the cost of new legislation,including updates to economic and demographicprojections. Post-January 2009 policies only reectsthe effect of policies, including temporary policies,through 2011. Does not reect the de cit reductionproposed in the Presidents FY2013 Budget goingforward. Numbers may not sum due to rounding.