35
X Financial Analysis for Forest Financial Analysis for Forest Resource Managers Resource Managers J O’L hli Ph D Jay O’Laughlin, Ph.D. Professor of Forestry & Policy Sciences Director of the Policy Analysis Group C ll fN t lR College of Natural Resources University of Idaho (208) 885-5776; [email protected] www

Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

X

Financial Analysis for Forest Financial Analysis for Forest yResource Managers

yResource Managers

J O’L hli Ph DJay O’Laughlin, Ph.D.Professor of Forestry & Policy Sciences

Director of the Policy Analysis GroupC ll f N t l RCollege of Natural Resources

University of Idaho(208) 885-5776; [email protected]

www

Page 2: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Handout – Outline & Example Problems

NOTE: Revised version, Feb. 13, 2012

Page 3: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Handouts – References

Page 4: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Handouts – References

O’Laughlin & Cook (2001, p. 3)

Page 5: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Handouts – Process Diagram & Formulae

Page 6: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 7: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 8: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Financial analysis step-by-step

Most Difficult

More Difficult

E iEasier

Page 9: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 10: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Forestry investment return components

Timber growth

Page 11: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Forestry investment return components

Timber growthStumpage price increaseStumpage price increase

Douglas-fir, average Puget Sound region prices, 1970 2004 (adjusted for inflation in 2002 dollars)1970-2004 (adjusted for inflation in 2002 dollars).

Zobrist (2005, p. 9)

Page 12: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Forestry investment return components

Timber growthStumpage price increaseStumpage price increaseLand value increaseLand value for growing timber may be calculated using a compound interest formula. Increasing that value for future land use change is highly speculative and problematic.

The Land Expectation Value (LEV) represents the maximum additional outlay that could be made at the beginning of the rotation for the actual purchase of the land while still earning p gthe target rate of return on the total investment. Thus LEV is also considered the maximum willingness to pay for land for forestry use given management expectations (Zobrist 2005, p.7).

Page 13: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 14: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Formulae . . .

Page 15: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Financial calculator . . .

Page 16: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Spreadsheet . . .

Page 17: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 18: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Examples: Site index 70

Page 19: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table: naturally generated

Page 20: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table: naturally generated

Page 21: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table(s): Douglas-fir plantations

2. The landowner has an objective to maximize long-term financial returns from sustainable timber management She has heard thatmanagement. She has heard that Douglas-fir plantation manage-ment may be a good choice. After calculating the tree growthAfter calculating the tree growth rates for the four management alternatives (Sheets 3-6) and assuming a final harvest in year g y80, which alternative may be best? Sheet ____

Page 22: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table(s): Douglas-fir plantations

2. The landowner has an objective to maximize long-term financial returns from sustainable timber management She has heard thatmanagement. She has heard that Douglas-fir plantation manage-ment may be a good choice. After calculating the tree growthAfter calculating the tree growth rates for the four management alternatives (Sheets 3-6) and assuming a final harvest in year g y80, which alternative may be best? Sheet ____

Page 23: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table(s): Douglas-fir plantations

2. The landowner has an objective to maximize long-term financial returns from sustainable timber management She has heard thatmanagement. She has heard that Douglas-fir plantation manage-ment may be a good choice. After calculating the tree growthAfter calculating the tree growth rates for the four management alternatives (Sheets 3-6) and assuming a final harvest in year g y80, which alternative may be best? Sheet ____

Page 24: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Yield table(s): Douglas-fir plantations

2. The landowner has an objective to maximize long-term financial returns from sustainable timber management She has heard thatmanagement. She has heard that Douglas-fir plantation manage-ment may be a good choice. After calculating the tree growthAfter calculating the tree growth rates for the four management alternatives (Sheets 3-6) and assuming a final harvest in year g y80, which alternative may be best? Sheet ____

Page 25: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 26: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Land and timber valuation

Zobrist (2005, p. 7)

Page 27: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Land Expectation Value (LEV = SEV)

Zobrist (2005, p. 7)

Page 28: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Formulae . . .

Page 29: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Problem 3 . . .

Page 30: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Problem 3 . . .

Page 31: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Problem 3 . . .

Zobrist (2005, p. 10)

Page 32: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 33: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

Problem 4 . . .

Page 34: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

OUTLINE

Page 35: Financial Analysis 02-13-2012 - University of Idaho

X

Financial Analysis for Forest Financial Analysis for Forest yResource Managers

yResource Managers

J O’L hli Ph DJay O’Laughlin, Ph.D.Professor of Forestry & Policy Sciences

Director of the Policy Analysis GroupC ll f N t l RCollege of Natural Resources

University of Idaho(208) 885-5776; [email protected]

www