Finance and Performance Committee Addendum 03/14

8/12/2019 Finance and Performance Committee Addendum 03/14

1/61

Note: The reports contained within this agenda are for consideration and should not be construed as Council policyunless and until adopted. Should Members require further information relating to any reports, please contactthe relevant manager, Chairperson or Deputy Chairperson.

I hereby give notice that an ordinary meeting of the Finance and Performance Committee will beheld on:

Date:Time:Meeting Room:Venue:

Thursday, 13 March 20149.30amReception Lounge, Level 2Auckland Town Hall301-305 Queen StreetAuckland

Finance and Performance Committee

OPEN ADDENDUM AGENDA

MEMBERSHIP

Chairperson Cr Penny WebsterDeputy Chairperson Cr Ross Clow

Members Cr Anae Arthur Anae Cr Calum PenroseCr Cameron Brewer Cr Dick QuaxMayor Len Brown, JP Cr Sharon Stewart, QSMCr Dr Cathy Casey Member David TaipariCr Bill Cashmore Member John TamihereCr Linda Cooper, JP Cr Sir John Walker, KNZM, CBECr Chris Darby Cr Wayne WalkerCr Alf Filipaina Cr John WatsonCr Hon Chris Fletcher, QSO Cr George Wood, CNZMCr Penny HulseCr Denise KrumCr Mike Lee

(Quorum 11 members)Crispian FranklinDemocracy Advisor

11 March 2014

Contact Telephone: (09) 373 6205Email: [email protected]: www.aucklandcouncil.govt.nz


2/61


3/61


13 March 2014

Page 3

ITEM TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE

10 Bruce Pulman Park Trust - Request for $4 million Community loan 5

11 Monthly budget update 55

PUBLIC EXCLUDEDProcedural motion to exclude the public 61

C1 Update on proposal to acquire an easement in Newmarket for access

purposes 61


4/61


5/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014

Bruce Pulman Park Trust - Request for $4 million Community loan Page 5

Bruce Pulman Park Trust - Request for $4 million Community loan

File No.:CP2013/28265

Purpose1. To obtain the decision of the Committee on whether to approve a community loan of up to

$4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust (BPPT) for the purpose of completing the Indoor

Courts Centre at Bruce Pulman Park, Walters Road, Papakura.

Executive Summary2. The Bruce Pulman Park Trust leases Bruce Pulman Park from Auckland Council. The park

covers an area of 64 hectares, is located on Walters Road, Papakura and consists of

facilities catering to football, rugby, netball, tennis, cricket, gymnastics, together with

supporting ancillary services. Over 650,000 people visited the park in 2013, and with further

developments planned, this is likely to increase to in excess of 1.3 million visits in future

years.

3. The former Papakura District Council approved a grant of $3.9 million to the Bruce Pulman

Park Trust as a contribution towards the $10.5 million cost of constructing the Indoor Courts

Centre at the park. This decision was subsequently endorsed by Auckland Council and

recorded in a funding agreement.

4. As a result of design enhancements, increased scope of works and cost increases, the

enlarged facility has a revised construction cost of $17 million. Construction of the complex

is well advanced and the trust is seeking funding to ensure the building is completed in a

timely manner.

5. The BPPT is therefore seeking an Auckland Council community loan of up to $4 million,

[preferably interest free], repayable over a 5 year term.

6. A review of the trading results of the BPPT and the Manukau Counties Community Facilities

Community Trust (MCCFCT) indicate strong trading results over the last years, coupled with

strong balance sheets. The BPPT is the single largest recipient of annual grant distributions

from the MCCFCT.

7. Security for the loan will be by way of cross-default provisions in the loan and lease

documents.

8. The lease agreements contain provisions that enable the BPPT to seek assistance from

Auckland Council to enable the construction to be completed.

9. It is recommended that a loan of up to $4 million, for a maximum period of 5 years be

approved at an interest rate to be determined by the Finance and Performance Committee.


6/61

Item10


13 March 2014


Recommendation/sThat the Finance and Performance Committee:

a) Acknowledge and record its support for the development of Bruce Pulman Park and

acknowledge the contribution that the Indoor Court Centre will make to the sports

facilities located both at the park, Auckland and at a national level.

b) Approve a community loan of up to $4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust for a

period of 5 years; at an interest rate equivalent to the cost of borrowing for Auckland

Council (circa 5.66%); with interest only payable for the first three years, and interest

and principal repaid over the final two years; other terms and conditions are to be in

accordance with Auckland Councils normal lending terms and conditions in respect

of community loans.

c) Delegate approval for the final terms and conditions of the loan agreement to the

Manager Finance and Manager Regional and Local Planning.

d) Approve varying the leases between Auckland Council and Bruce Pulman Park Trust

in respect of 90 and 138 Walters Road Papakura to provide for cross-default in

respect of the loan, noting that these variations must be executed prior to the release

of any funds.

DiscussionBackground on Bruce Pulman Park

10. The Bruce Pulman Park Trust leases Bruce Pulman Park from Auckland Council. The park

covers an area of 64 hectares and is located on Walters Road, Papakura and consists of:

15 sports fields

indoor sport, recreation and administration facilities

a purpose-built indoor gymnastics and trampoline facility

21 outdoor netball courts

6 outdoor tennis courts

2 cricket ovals

an all-weather sprint strip

open space

an adjoining training and accommodation facility (the Lodge)


7/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


11. The Trust expects there to have been over 650,000 visits to Bruce Pulman Park in 2013, up

from approximately 600,000 in 2010. Further developments either under way or planned

allow for upwards of a further 700,000 visits to the park, giving an annual total visitation in

excess of 1.3 million.

12. There are currently a large number of sports and community groups using the park,

including Papakura Netball, Ardmore Marist Rugby Club, Counties Manukau Gymnastics,

Counties Manukau Cricket, numerous schools, Netball New Zealand, NZ Academy of Sport

and Auckland University of Technology. A number of individual passive recreation users

also frequent the park. The sports fields comprise a significant part of the Papakura

communitys recreation network. Attachment A lists the 2013 users of the park.

13. The former Papakura District Council historically supported the park in a number of

manners. In 2006, the Papakura District Council joined the Bruce Pulman Park Trust,

Netball Counties Manukau and Papakura Netball Centre on a Working Party to plan for the

construction of an indoor court centre on Bruce Pulman Park. In 2007, Papakura District

Council allocated $2 million to the construction of the Indoor Courts Centre and a further

$1,900,000 in 2009.

14. Resource consent was originally granted for 4 indoor courts, however following completion

of a feasibility study for the Indoor Courts Centre in 2009, this was revised to include 6

indoor courts, built to Netball NZ and Auckland Volleyballs specifications for national

championships. Both the Auckland Regional Netball Facilities Report and the AucklandRegional Physical Activity and Sport Strategy supported the feasibility study. In particular,

the Auckland Regional Netball Facilities Report identified the development of indoor court

facilities as its highest priority and states that the most significant gap in the Auckland region

is in Counties Manukau.

15. Since the completion of the Indoor Courts Centre feasibility study, the Bruce Pulman Park

Comprehensive Development Plan has also been completed, and was formally endorsed by

the Papakura District Council in 2010. This Plan outlines proposed capital development at

the park, including:

the Indoor Courts Centre

a golf centre

a sport development centre

sports office and resource centre

cricket pavilion

childrens adventure playground

a multi-purpose sports centre field floodlights and goalposts

fitness cycle trail and exersites


8/61

Item10


13 March 2014


16. Approximately $30 million has been invested in the development of Bruce Pulman Park

(excluding current work in progress). An estimated further $98 million will be required to

complete the planned improvements detailed in the Comprehensive Development Plan.

17. To date, Council has provided a $439,000 per annum operational subsidy; funded the

Comprehensive Development Plan; financially contributed to the construction of a public

toilet in July 2010; and has allocated $3.9 million to the development of the Indoor Courts

Centre. The Comprehensive Development Plan confirms that most of the large

development projects on the park will require feasibility studies. Several of these have now

been completed, with the balance still to be undertaken.

18. Bruce Pulman Park Trust has a Memorandum of Understanding with Auckland University of

Technology that provides certainty of use and contributes to the long-term sustainability of

the park; in turn, this provides opportunities for coaching and exercise science, improving

health outcomes through physical activity.

19. A significant amount of development has already occurred at the park and construction of

the Indoor Courts Centre is well underway.

Organisational Structure

20. There are a number of organisations involved in enabling the Indoor Court Centre to be

constructed. The key organisations include:

Bruce Pulman Park Trust

Manukau Counties Community Facilities Charitable Trust

HEB Construction Ltd

Staff have identified and worked through the nature of the trusts and delivery entities and

have a number of concerns that need to be addressed.

Lease

21. There are two leases in respect of Bruce Pulman Park. These effectively mirror each other

regarding terms and conditions. The agreements were entered into by the former Papakura

District Council and extend a larger than normal number of rights to the lessee (i.e. BPPT).

The basic terms of the agreement are as follows:

a. Thirty-three year term commencing from 1 August 2001 with a right of renewal for a

minimum of a further 33 years, on essentially the same terms and conditions.

b. $1 per annum rent, with no rent reviews.

c. The trust will not pay any land rates on the leased area.

d. The trust would undertake a certain minimum level of improvements at the park.

However in approving this, the council in its capacity as lessor (not regulatory), pre-


9/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


approved all matters relating to the improvements (including alterations, additions

and renewal), giving the trust full and unfettered discretion to decide all matters

relating to the improvements.

e. If, for any reason, the trust is unable to complete the work on the improvements

within a reasonable period of time the trust is permitted to advise the council,

following which the council (although under no obligation to do so) can either

complete the work itself, or provide funding to the trust to complete the works. Any

amount advanced shall be a debt owing to the council, unless agreed otherwise.

22. The effect of these clauses is that provided the improvements are consistent with the stated

Permitted Use of the Land the trust has the ability to develop the park as it wishes, produce

and amend plans for improvements as it desires, and should there be any funding shortfall, it

can request Council to assist to remedy the situation (which by implication means provide

funding), although Council is under no obligation to do so.

Nature of Works Being UndertakenIndoor Court Centre

23. As noted earlier, work has commenced on the construction of the Indoor Courts Centre, and

Council has already approved grants totalling $3.9 million towards the construction costs

that (at the time) were estimated to be circa $10 million. Since construction has started, the

scope of works has expanded significantly as a result of enhancements agreed between the

BPPT and interested user groups of the facility. The improvements will greatly enhance the

usability and appeal of the facility, creating a high-quality facility with greater user appeal.

24. Aerial and other photographs of the development are attached as Attachment B. Plans of

the facility are shown at Attachment C.

25. The extent of the enhancements and additional costs is detailed below in an explanation

provided by the BPPT:

The planned expenditure for the construction of the Indoor Courts Centre on Bruce Pulman Park has

increased by $6.161m due to a major redesign, enhancements and soil conditions (see below). The

enhancements are the result of: Further consultation with the community resulting in additional information and needs unaccounted

for in the original Feasibility Study.

Further consultation with Netball NZ, Auckland Basketball and Manukau Auckland Volleyball.

At the request of Netball NZ, consultation and planning with SKYTV to accommodate live

television coverage of major events.

Following assessment of Auckland Council/NSOs Sports Strategies, BPP Trust reassessed the

usage of the Indoor Courts Centre. Originally designed as a training centre, there was

reconsideration and enhancement of the designs to accommodate major events including Nationaland National Secondary Schools for all three key sports codes and possibility of ANZ Netball

events. BPP is a training centre and this move in our philosophy was taken to cater for the needs


10/61

Item10


13 March 2014


of the community, sports organisations and the Auckland South demographics including a large

netball following and the non-capability of the Manukau based Vodafone Events Centre to host

major court sport events.

26. Design Enhancements and Variations:

1. Increase in overall size of 2,601m

2. Site Works and Overall

a. An increase of 13 piles (from 70 to 83) was needed due to the increase in loads, and

increase in building size, plus pile depth extensions.

b. Associated additional site works including excavations, foundations, drainage, concrete

etc.

c. Eco-friendly projects for ventilation and collection of grey water storage tank installation.

3. Ground Floor

a. Increase in the size of the foyer to provide for better access and egress additional for

supporters and spectators including a caf, with an emphasis to minimise outdoor and

wet shoe traffic on the international FIBA Level 1 sprung sports floor.

b. Addition of a canopy to provide for wet weather shelter for transport vehicles and foot

traffic (south westerly wind and rain). Access shifted to northern side of building.

c. Building extension on both western and eastern ends of the stadium to provide for

storage (outdoor access), increase in size of electrical services room, access to SKY

Deck (level 3), pre-school childrens play room with viewing and access onto sports

arena floor to provide parent child-care facilities for mid-week daytime sports leagues.

d. Major extension to northern and southern side of the stadium to accommodate level 2

mezzanine seating.

e. Under floor and in column services cabling, including provisions for television

production, LCD logistics and score display boards.

f. Courtside fixed team seating.

g. Provision for indoor/outdoor access between indoor and outdoor netball courts.

h. Redesign to increase team rooms, ablutions, showers, cold pools from two to four and

additional storage.

4. Mezzanine Floo r/Level 2

a. Extensions to accommodate additional access, stairwells and up to 1,000 seats based

on National Sports Organisations requirements for both regional and national events.

Status quo remains in the design to provide for a single major event court and provide

strengthened floor space for organisers to install 4,000 temporary seats.

b. Addition of balconies; increase in size of Control Room and Plant Room; increase in

meeting rooms to replace Ground floor rooms converted into Team Rooms; re- layout

for offices etc.

c. Reinstatement of suspended ceilings.

5. 3rd Level, SKY Deck


11/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


a. Installation of a goods lift to meet SKY TV specifications and control rooms; access from

ground level to 3rd level and construction of the television deck.

6. Prel iminary & Design

a. Costs associated with designing, project management, amendments to both Resource

and Building Consents, Fire Engineers and sub-contractor advisory consultations.

b. Future proofing and construction for wireless connectivity scoring and LCD displays.

27. The additional costs can be attributed not only to the expanded scope of the facility, but also

to other unforeseen factors arising during the early part of construction, despite

comprehensive investigative work.

28. The lease contains provisions that enable the BPPT to make alterations to the designs as it

wishes, and there is no provision for Auckland Council as lessor to challenge these.

29. The table below provides an overview of where the additional costs have been attributed to:

(Information supplied by Bruce Pulman Park Trust)

Cost variationsOriginal Tendered Costs August 2010 10,858,656Enhancements including variations 6,160,849Current Construction Costs September 2013 $17,019,505

Additional Design, Certification, Supervision and Consents 615,764Variations Piling, Excavations 659,850Enhancements Mezzanine Seating 1,231,989

Balustrades, Walkways, Glazing 922,700Canopy 550,000Storage at each end, Play Area 490,094Foyer, Mezzanine Offices, TV requirements, Lift 490,987Suspended Ceilings, Outdoor Viewing, Conference Room,Electrical, Graffiti Guard

819,840

Miscellaneous, Structural Steel Alternations 379,625Total $6,160,849

30. The BPPT had advised that the value of the additional building costs has been verified by

the Trusts quantity surveyor, however this has not been verified by Council staff at this

stage.

Request Received from the BPPT

31. In order to cover the additional costs, the BPPT is continuing to seek grant funding from a

variety of sources, but in the meantime is seeking to complete the construction of the facility

in a timely manner.

32. BPPT is seeking a concessionary community loan of up to $4 million from Auckland Council

for a term of 5 years. This will enable the Indoor Court Centre to be completed in the near

future while fund-raising continues.

33. The trust is requesting that, if approved, the loan be interest free for the duration of the term.


12/61

Item10


13 March 2014


34. In addition, and in order to assist cashflow for the project, the trust is seeking drawdown of

the loan over a 1 year period, with repayments commencing at the beginning of year 4, and

being concluded within the 5 year period (i.e. actually repaid over the last 2 year period of

the 5 years).

35. It is estimated that the cost of interest over the 5-year lifetime of the loan would be in the

vicinity of $860,000 (Attachment D). Currently there is no budget provision to cover these

costs. If the decision is made to charge interest on the loan, whether at a concessionary

rate, or at a rate sufficient to cover the cost to Council, the BPPT has indicated this cost

could be covered, however, its preference is for the loan to be interest-free.

36. If the loan is approved, and should the decision be made for the loan to be interest free, or at

a rate less than the cost to Council, the value of this benefit will be recognised by the BPPT.

Trust Sources of Funding

37. The reason for the 2 year repayment holiday (years 2 and 3 of the loan) relates to the flow of

cash from the largest donor to the BPPT, viz: Manukau Counties Community Facilities

Charitable Trust (MCCFCT). Correspondingly, the BPPT is the largest single recipient of

funding from the MCCFCT.

38. The intention is that grants in years 2 and 3 from MCCFCT will be used to finance the

project, and then grants in years 4 and 5 would be used to repay the loan.

39. The following table illustrates the donations received by BPPT from MCCRCT since 2009:(Source: Annual reports of the MCCFCT lodged with the Charities Commission)

Year Donation

2013 $3,158,995

2012 $3,110,474

2011 $2,717,691

2010 $1,853,353

2009 $1,589,513

40. The financial reports of the BPPT indicate very healthy trading results for the 6 years ended

31 March 2013. Accumulated surpluses exceed $13 million, with the vast majority of this

funding being redirected back into the development of the park and facilities. A summary of

the trading results for each of the BPPT and MCCFCT is included at Attachment E.

41. Apart from the $3.9 million grant from Auckland Council referred to above, the bulk of therevenue for the BPPT over the last six years has been derived from MCCFCT.


13/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


42. The BPPT shares two trustees in common with MCCFCT, including Bruce Pulman himself.

The significance of this being that there is probably a reasonable expectation that the BPPT

will continue to be a significant beneficiary of the MCCFCT into the foreseeable future,

ensuring that the BPPT has sufficient funding to undertake and complete the Indoor Courts

Centre development at Bruce Pulman Park, and then to repay the loan in the last two years

of the proposed term.

43. A copy of a Grants Distribution Policy dated 31 October 2013 has been provided. This has

been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Gaming Act 2003. The authorised

purposes of the Trust include the following items:

o Grants for the provision, maintenance and development of facilities and activities at Bruce

Pulman Park, including additions to the park by way of land purchase;

o Funds for the charitable purposes of the Bruce Pulman Park Trust for community sportingand other community activities;

The full list is available as Attachment F.

44. The forecasted budgets for 2014-2015 and the subsequent 4 years show budgeted

surpluses totalling $10.640 million. In the first three years ended 31 March 2017 these

surpluses ($6.395 million) will be used to finalise the Indoor Court Centre, and in the next

two years (2018 and 2019), the surpluses ($4.425 million) would be directed to repaying the

Council loan at the rate of $500,000 per quarter.

45. Based on the historic financial information together with the forecasted trading results out to

2019, it would appear that the BPPT will be in a strong position to repay the loan, if

approved.

Security for the Loan

46. Traditionally security for loans that are made to organisations leasing land and/or premises

from Auckland Council is for the lease to contain provisions that provide that should there be

default under the loan agreement, this would be deemed to be a default under the lease,

meaning that Council could enforce termination provisions in the lease and effectively take

control of the facilities.

47. The existing leases do not contain provisions of this nature. It will be necessary to vary the

leases to include cross-default provisions under the two agreements.

48. The Trust has confirmed that it is willing to amend the lease to allow for cross-default

provisions with the loan agreement.

49. A General Security Agreement will also be required as further security.


14/61

Item10


13 March 2014


Risks

50. There are a number of risks associated with this proposal that should be considered by

Council.

51. Given the provisions of the lease agreements that give wide reaching powers to the trust to

amend the plans without reference to Council (in its capacity as lessor), it is possible that

there could be further enhancements included in the project which put further strains on the

budgets for the project.

52. Despite best intentions, costs could increase to a level beyond current levels of available

funding.

53. The BPPT could commence other projects that divert funds away from completing the

Indoor Court Centre facility.

54. If a community loan is approved, approval of the loan could be made conditional on

ensuring there are clauses in the loan agreement that place conditions on the release of the

funding in place to minimise the possibility of these situations occurring.

Consideration55. Bruce Pulman Park is considered a strategic asset on both a local and Auckland-wide scale.

The proposed capital improvements will encourage national events and wider usage of the

park. The Bruce Pulman Park Trust is committed to providing accessible, world-class

infrastructure for the community.

56. Bruce Pulman Park aligns with the Auckland Regional Physical Activity and Sport Strategy

and the Papakura Draft Physical Activity Strategy. The Papakura Local Board Plan states a

commitment to the continued development of Bruce Pulman Park and its surrounding

facilities.

57. If this arrangements was being considered today (i.e. 2014), council may not be willing to

provide as many concessions as are contained in the agreements that have been entered

into. The agreements are weighed heavily in favour of the lessee, although this reflects the

significant level of investment that the trust is making into the park.

Options for the Community Loan

58. There are a number of options available to Auckland Council in respect of this request for a

loan. These include:

a) Not approving the loan request

b) Approve the request for a community loan in its entirety (i.e. as requested)

c) Approve the request, but on modified terms and conditions


15/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


59. In all instances the major difference relates to the amount of the loan, the length of the term,

interest rate and when draw down can occur and repayments commence.

60. All other terms and conditions would be based on the format of community loan agreements

previously developed by Legal Services. These include ensuring that the loans are drawn

down against certificates issued by the project manager, or quantity surveyors who certify

the value and quantum of work completed to date. i.e. there is no provision for draw down of

the loan as a lump sum quantity.

Not Approve the Loan

61. Not approving the loan is likely to place strain on the project and jeopardise the viability of

this particular piece of work at the park. Completion of the wooden floor is necessary to

enable the facility to be enclosed and weather-proofed.

62. In addition, should the BPPT wish to borrow funds from others sources, it is likely that any

lender will require security for the loan. As the underlying land is owned by Council, it will

not be possible for BPPT to offer mortgage security to a third-party lender. Instead, BPPT

may request that Council act as guarantor for the loan arrangement in which case further

legal arrangements would need to be implemented and Council would be under contractual

arrangements to the bank and have to rely on the Trust fulfilling its obligations under the

contracts.

App rove the Loan as Requested

63. The BPPT has requested an interest free loan of up to $4M, repayable over a 5 year period.

Based on the proposed drawdown and repayment schedule supplied by BPPT, the

estimated cost of interest over the 5 year period is $860,000 for which there are currently no

budgets held at either a corporate or local board level.

64. If an interest free loan is approved, it will be necessary to provide an additional budget

allowance to cover the annual cost of the interest.

65. Adequate and suitable security for the loan must be provided by the Trust, although this islikely to be limited to cross-default provisions in the loan and lease agreements.

Approve the Loan but on modi f ied terms and cond i t ions

66. A further alternative is for Council to consider and approve a loan arrangement on alternate

terms and conditions, for instance, a lesser sum, different period of time, different

repayment terms, and whether or not interest is charged, and at what rate.

67. A number of options are available regards the interest rate payable. The Council could opt

to:

1. carry the cost of providing the loan as interest free to the BPPT;


16/61

Item10


13 March 2014


2. on-charge interest at the same rate that Council borrow the funds; or

3. elect to charge interest on the basis of cost plus a margin (typically a small margin to

cover overheads and other costs).

68. Existing community loans are on many varied basis relating to terms (length) and interest

rates, and are reflective of the organisations ability to repay, legacy council policy prevailing

at the time, as well as the perceived value of the community benefits arising from the

development.

69. Adequate and suitable security for the loan must be provided by the Trust.

70. These options have been discussed with the Mr Pulman who has indicated that the Trust

would be willing to consider alternative arrangements if that was the wish of Council.

Local Board Views71. The Papakura Local Board Plan states:

Bruce Pulman Park has high-quality facilities and caters for such a wide range of activities

that it has the makings of a complex of sub-regional importance. The development is

ongoing. The trust undertaking the project needs to be supported both through funding and

assistance in land acquisition to ensure that this developing world-class centre fulfils its

potential.

72. Details of the loan request were reported to the Papakura Local Board. A copy of the

Papakura Local Board resolutions supporting this loan application are attached as

Attachment H.

Maori Impact Statement

73. A loan to the BPPT will have little direct impact on Maori. However the demographic make

up of users of Bruce Pulman Park and its facilities would suggest that a large number of the

Maori community would be users of the park and would therefore benefit from the

completion of the various facilities at the park.

Implementation Issues

74. If the request for a loan is approved, there are a number of legal matters arising that will

need to be comprehensively documented. Legal Services are currently providing advice on

this matter and will maintain a watching brief in this regards. The major matters to consider

from a legal perspective are the terms and conditions of the loan, and the security to be

taken.

75. In 2011 the BPPT received approval from Council to utilise $2 million of the original $3.9million grant to assist with cashflow requirements associated with constructing Pulman

Lodge. In accordance with the agreement entered into at the time to record this


17/61

Item1

0


13 March 2014


arrangement, the funding has subsequently been repaid and used by the trust in respect of

the Indoor Courts Centre.

AttachmentsNo. Title Page

A BPPT - User Groups - 2013 19

B BPPT - Aerial & Other Photos 21

C BPPT - Indoor Court Centre Plans 39

D Indicative Interest Costs $4 million 43

E BPPT Summary of Trading Results - 6 years to 31 March 2013 45

F MCCFCT Summary of Trading Results - 6 years to 31 March 2013 47

G MCCFCT Grants Distribution Policy Oct 2013 49

H Papakura Local Board Resolutions 19 Feb 2014 53

Signatories

Authors Leigh Redshaw - Strategic Partnerships Advisor

Authorisers Penny Pirrit - Regional & Local Planning Manager

Roger Blakeley - Chief Planning Officer

Andrew McKenzie - Chief Finance Officer


18/61


19/61

AttachmentA

Item1

0


13 March 2014



20/61

AttachmentA

Item10


13 March 2014



21/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



22/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



23/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



24/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



25/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



26/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



27/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



28/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



29/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



30/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



31/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



32/61


33/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



34/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



35/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



36/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



37/61

AttachmentB

Item1

0


13 March 2014



38/61

AttachmentB

Item10


13 March 2014



39/61

AttachmentC

Item1

0


13 March 2014



40/61


13 March 2014



41/61

AttachmentC

Item1

0


13 March 2014



42/61


43/61

AttachmentD

Item1

0


13 March 2014



44/61


45/61

AttachmentE

Item1

0


13 March 2014



46/61


47/61

AttachmentF

Item1

0


13 March 2014



48/61


49/61

AttachmentG

Item1

0


13 March 2014



50/61

AttachmentG

Item10


13 March 2014



51/61

AttachmentG

Item1

0


13 March 2014



52/61


53/61

AttachmentH

Item1

0


13 March 2014



54/61

AttachmentH

Item10


13 March 2014



55/61

Item1

1


13 March 2014

Monthly budget update Page 55

Monthly budget update

File No.:CP2014/02607

Purpose1. The Finance and Performance Committee has delegated authority to approve changes to

budgets during a financial year. This report will be provided each month as required. Itcollates decisions required of the committee on changes to the budget for 2013/2014, andprovides a financial context within which the decisions can be made.

Executive Summary2. The table below shows the financial impacts of all budget changes considered in this

committee meeting. The impacts include:

$1.2 million increase in net borrowing for 2013/2014

$179,000negative impact on the councils operating result for 2013/2014 $10,000 increase in rates requirement for 2014/2015. The projected average general rates

increase would remain at 2.5 per cent.

$000Closing GroupNet Borrowing

Operating After TaxSurplus/(Deficit)

General Rates Cumulative %rates increase

2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 % increase

Annual Plan 2013/2014 6,502,315 -13,482 1,403,287 3.5%

Decisions agreed since 1 July 2013 76,510 -9,057 2,628

Current position 6,578,825 -22,539 1,388,834 2.5%

February proposals

SkyPath investigation 175 -179 10 0.001%

Bruce Pulman Park Trust loan 1,000 0 0 0.000%

Cultural Impact Assessment facilitators 0 0 0 0.000%

Potential Position 6,580,000 -22,718 1,388,844 2.5%

3. The Budget Committee will have the opportunity to address these impacts alongside otherbudget changes through the 2014/15 Annual Plan budget process.

Auckland Harbour Bridge Pathway (SkyPath)

4. In December 2013, the council approved a way forward for the investigation of the SkyPath

project, a walking and cycle pathway to be attached to the Auckland Harbour Bridge.Auckland Tourism Events and Economic Development (ATEED), whose Chief Executivesponsors the project for the council group, is seeking additional operating funding of$175,000 in the 2013/14 financial year for investigation work that cannot be undertaken withinternal resources. Some of the costs to date have been paid for from ATEEDs work ingcapital, with an understanding that the entire cost would be funded by the council.

5. The additional funding is to cover approximately $50,000 in specialist legal cost, a grant of$85,000 to contribute to preparation of reports and images for the resource consentapplication of the Auckland Harbour Bridge Pathway Trust, and $40,000 in consultancy costfor undertaking patronage studies. It is recommended that the committee approve additionalfunding of $175,000 to ATEED for this purpose.

Bruce Pulman Park Trust Loan6. A separate report on the agenda recommends the committee approve a community loan of

up to $4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust for a period of five years, at an interest rate


56/61

Item11


13 March 2014


equivalent to the cost of borrowing for the council. The drawdown in 2013/14 is estimated tobe $1 million. It is noted that the recommendation, if adopted, will not have an impact on theoperating result of the current year or general rates funding requirements for future years.

7. Should the committee decide to impose an interest rate that is lower than the councils costof borrowing, an adverse impact on rates will result. In any event, the loan will increase thedebt level of the council until it is fully repaid.

Unitary Plan - Cultural Impact Assessment

8. In response to strong feedback from Aucklands 19 iwi authorities and the IndependentMaori Statutory Board, the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) requires a CulturalImpact Assessment (CIA) to be submitted for a specified list of resource consentapplications that may have an effect on Mana Whenua values. The PAUP also includes aprovision that enables Mana Whenua to confirm that a CIA is not required. Since thenotification of the PAUP on 30 September 2013, it is estimated that between 10 and 30applications per week have triggered the need for a CIA or confirmation from Mana Whenuathat a CIA is not required.

9. In the current CIA process, the council provides resource consent applicants with the contact

details of the relevant Mana Whenua representatives, and leaves the two parties to workwith one another in the first instance. If no response regarding the outcome is receivedwithin 15 working days, council staff will then intervene and facilitate the process.

10. To make the CIA process easy for both resource consent applicants and Mana Whenua, theResource Consent department is looking to appoint two to three CIA facilitators who willmake the initial contact with Mana Whenua on behalf of applicants, and follow up on theneed for a CIA. The additional cost for this initiative is estimated to be $100,000 for 2013/14,which will be funded from existing budgets.

11. Any additional funding requirements from 2014/15 onwards associated with the PAUP,including CIA facilitators, will be considered by the Budget Committee in a separate reporton 27 March, as part of the annual plan process.

Recommendation/sThat the Finance and Performance Committee:

a) approve additional operational funding of $175,000 in the 2013/14 financial year toAuckland Tourism, Events and Economic Development Limited to undertake furtherinvestigation of the Auckland Harbour Bridge Pathway (SkyPath) proposal.

b) note that a community loan of up to $4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust at aninterest rate equivalent to the cost of borrowing for Auckland Council will not affectthe operating result of 2013/14 or the general rates funding requirements for futureyears.

c) note that additional resources will be deployed to facilitate the Cultural ImpactAssessment process required under the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan, and thesewill be funded from the existing budgets for the 2013/14 financial year.

d) note that any additional funding requirements from 2014/15 onwards associated withthe Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan will be reported to the Budget Committee on 27March, as part of the annual plan process.

e) agree that the councils budgets be updated to reflect the financial implications of theabove decisions.


57/61

Item1

1


13 March 2014


DiscussionBackground

12. Rates for 2013/2014 have been set with no provision made for accommodating new or

additional expenditure items. Any new expenditure committed to will either requirereprioritisation of existing budgets or increased borrowing.

13. None of the budget changes proposed in this report will have a material impact on thecouncils future rates requirement, current year operating deficit or projected debt levels.

Auckland Harbour Bridge Pathway (SkyPath)

14. In December 2013, the council approved a way forward for the investigation of the SkyPathproject, a walking and cycle pathway to be attached to the Auckland Harbour Bridge.ATEEDs Chief Executive is sponsoring the project for the council group. ATEED is seekingadditional operating budget of $175,000 in the 2013/14 financial year for investigation workthat cannot be undertaken with internal resources. Some of the costs to date have been

covered by ATEEDs working capital, with an understanding that the entire cost would befunded by the council.

15. In regard to the additional funding sought, approximately $50,000 is allowed for specialistlegal input in addition to the in-house legal services, which is required due to the somewhatunconventional nature of the SkyPath proposal.

16. The project team also intends to provide a grant of $85,000 the Auckland Harbour BridgePathway Trust, which is a contribution to the preparation cost associated with the reportsand assessments that the trust will submit in its resource consent application to the council.These materials (e.g. traffic effect report and images) will be of interest and use to the publicand the Auckland Council group in future investigation and consultation.

17. Last but not least, approximately $40,000 in consultancy charge is allowed for as ATEEDs

share of the total cost of the patronage projection review. The project team engaged Angus& Associates Limited to undertake surveys and develop a model to assess the likelypatronage profile for SkyPath over a 20-year period. This essential work has and willcontinue to help understand the revenue projections to manage the councils risks in relationto the potential underwrite. The majority of this work was undertaken in the second half of2013. However, further targeted work is necessary in the next few months to investigate thelikely peak or daily usage to assist the council in understanding these effects on thesurrounding network and areas.

Bruce Pulman Park Trust Loan

18. A separate report on the agenda recommends the committee approve a community loan ofup to $4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust for a period of five years, at an interest rateequivalent to the cost of borrowing for the council, subject to variation of the current leaseagreement providing for adequate security of the loan is executed prior to any drawdown.The drawdown in 2013/14 is estimated to be $1 million.

19. It is noted that the recommendation, if adopted, will not have an impact on the operatingresult of the current year or general rates funding requirements for future years. Should thecommittee decide to impose an interest rate that is lower than the councils cost ofborrowing, an adverse impact on rates will result. In any event, the loan will increase thedebt level of the council until it is fully repaid.

Unitary Plan - Cultural Impact Assessment

20. In response to strong feedback from Aucklands 19 Iwi Authorities and the Independent

Maori Statutory Board, the Proposed Auckland Unitary Plan (PAUP) requires a CulturalImpact Assessment (CIA) to be submitted for a specified list of resource consentapplications that may have an effect on Mana Whenua values. The PAUP also includes aprovision that enables Mana Whenua to confirm that a CIA is not required. Examples of the


58/61

Item11


13 March 2014


types of resource consent that may trigger the need for a CIA are discharges fromcrematoria, earthworks within 20 metres of the sites of significance to Mana Whenuamapped in the PAUP, and coastal reclamation. While most of the rules in the PAUP do nothave legal effect until decisions are released, due to the requirements of the ResourceManagement Act, many of the rules that may trigger a CIA came into effect on 30September 2013. Since that time, it is estimated that between 10 and 30 applications perweek have triggered the need for a CIA or confirmation from Mana Whenua that a CIA is notrequired.

21. In the current CIA process, the council provides resource consent applicants with the contactdetails of the relevant Mana Whenua representatives, and leaves the two parties to workwith one another in the first instance. If no response regarding the outcome is receivedwithin 15 working days, council staff will then intervene and facilitate the process.

22. To make the CIA process easy for both resource consent applicants and Mana Whenua, theResource Consent department is looking to appoint two to three CIA facilitators who willmake the initial contact with Mana Whenua on behalf of applicants, and follow up on theneed for a CIA. The additional cost for this initiative is estimated to be $100,000 for 2013/14,which will be funded from existing budgets.

23. Any additional funding requirements for 2014/15 onwards associated with the PAUP,including CIA facilitators, will be considered by the Budget Committee in a separate reporton 27 March, as part of the annual plan process.

Overall budget impact

24. The table below shows the financial impacts of all budget changes considered in thiscommittee meeting. The impacts include:

$1.2 million increase in net borrowing for 2013/2014

$179,000negative impact on the councils operating result for 2013/2014 $10,000 increase in rates requirement for 2014/2015. The projected average general rates

increase would remain at 2.5 per cent.

$000Closing GroupNet Borrowing

Operating After TaxSurplus/(Deficit)

General Rates Cumulative %rates increase

2013/2014 2013/2014 2014/2015 % increase

Annual Plan 2013/2014 6,502,315 -13,482 1,403,287 3.5%

Decisions agreed since 1 July 2013 76,510 -9,057 2,628

Current position 6,578,825 -22,539 1,388,834 2.5%

February proposals

SkyPath investigation 175 -179 10 0.001%

Bruce Pulman Park Trust loan 1,000 0 0 0.000%

Cultural Impact Assessment facilitators 0 0 0 0.000%

Potential Position 6,580,000 -22,718 1,388,844 2.5%

25. The Budget Committee will have the opportunity to address these impacts alongside otherbudget changes through the 2014/15 Annual Plan budget process.

Consideration

Local Board Views

Bruce Pulman Park Trust loan

26. The Papakura Local Board supports the development of Bruce Pulman Park, andacknowledges the contribution that the Indoor Court Centre will make to the sports facilitieslocated both at the park and southern Auckland. It recommends to this committee that a


59/61

Item1

1


13 March 2014


community loan of up to $4 million to the Bruce Pulman Park Trust be approved for a periodof five years, at an interest rate to be determined by this committee.

Mori Impact Statement

27. It is considered that the Cultural Impact Assessment improvement initiative will providesignificant benefits in terms of the service the council provides to resource consent

applicants including Morithat are required to provide a CIA. It is also strongly aligned withthe commitments made to Mana Whenua engagement and the protection of Mana Whenuavalues in the Auckland Plan.

28. Staff do not consider that other decisions or budget adjustments set out in this report have aspecific impact on Mori.

General

29. Staff do not consider that the decisions or budget adjustments set out in this report aresignificant for the purposes of the Auckland Council Significance Policy.

Implementation Issues30. Budgets will be amended in core financial systems and used for internal management

reporting, regular reporting to councillors and financial control for the 2013/2014 financialyear.

AttachmentsThere are no attachments for this report.

Signatories

Authors Neil Huang - Senior Analyst - Evaluation

Authorisers Ross Tucker - Team Leader Capital PlanningMatthew Walker - Manager Financial Plan Policy and Budgeting

Andrew McKenzie - Chief Finance Officer


60/61


61/61


13 March 2014

Exclusion of the Public: Local Government Official Informationand Meetings Act 1987

That the Finance and Performance Committee:

a) exclude the public from the following part(s) of the proceedings of this meeting.

The general subject of each matter to be considered while the public is excluded, the reason forpassing this resolution in relation to each matter, and the specific grounds under section 48(1) ofthe Local Government Official Information and Meetings Act 1987 for the passing of this resolutionfollows.

This resolution is made in reliance on section 48(1)(a) of the Local Government OfficialInformation and Meetings Act 1987 and the particular interest or interests protected by section 6 orsection 7 of that Act which would be prejudiced by the holding of the whole or relevant part of theproceedings of the meeting in public, as follows:

C1 Update on proposal to acquire an easement in Newmarket for access purposesReason for passing this resolutionin relation to each matter

Particular interest(s) protected(where applicable)

Ground(s) under section 48(1) forthe passing of this resolution

The public conduct of the part ofthe meeting would be likely to resultin the disclosure of information forwhich good reason for withholdingexists under section 7.

s7(2)(i) - The withholding of theinformation is necessary to enablethe local authority to carry on,without prejudice or disadvantage,negotiations (including commercialand industrial negotiations).

In particular, the report containsinformation on property valueswhich could impact on negotiations

with landowners..

s48(1)(a)

The public conduct of the part ofthe meeting would be likely to resultin the disclosure of information forwhich good reason for withholdingexists under section 7.

Documents

Finance and Performance Committee Addendum 03/14