Upload
lewis-metho
View
164
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
WHEAT- Koring
02/22/15
02/22/15
02/22/15
02/22/15
02/22/15
SORGHUM
SORGHUM
SORGHUM
WHEAT
02/22/15
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
Prof Piet Hammes – Emeritas
Prof John Taylor- Emeritas & Chair – SAFSS Prof Groeneveld – Statistics (retired) Dr PG Randall - Wheat Trust Staff members of the Department of Plant
Production & Soil Science – UP and Department of Food Science, University of
Pretoria
LA METHODEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES
TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, MAIN CAMPUS, PRETORIA
02/22/15
ACKNOWLEGEMENTS
cont
FORD FOUNDATION
ARC OMNIA FERTILIZER Co. SYNGENTA Co. Ltd WHEAT TRUST
LA METHODEPARTMENT OF CROP SCIENCES
TSHWANE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, MAIN CAMPUS, PRETORIA
02/22/15
CHINA CONGRESS-BREAD AHEAD
02/22/15
02/22/15
Dr Mbele
Premier’s office
Professor Mollel
University of Limpopo
Dr Metho
Depart of Agriculture KZN
Mrs Mathe
Mangosuthu Technikon
02/22/15
Dr Masika
University of Fort Hare
Professor Allan Femi
Lana Mangosuthu Technikon
Team Leader
02/22/15
02/22/15
DEDICATED LOVING MOTHER
02/22/15
DEDICATED CARING FATHER
02/22/15
BACKGROUND TO STUDY
Grain protein content affects the flour yield and bread-making quality of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Grain protein content is genetically controlled, but may vary with cultivar, soil fertility [especially nitrogen], location and climate. Genotype X environment interaction plays a major role in determining grain protein level. Grain protein content may be increased by improved soil fertility status or
02/22/15
BACKGROUND TO STUDY cont
Using [wheat genotypes] with ability to
produce improved grain protein content and quality. The interface between actual nutrient status, cultivar productivity and product quality may be important to South Africa (world-all-over) where the price of [wheat and bread......radio active....value adding] are determined on the basis of grain protein content and bread-making quality02/22/15
OBJECTIVES
1. To quantify the effects of [six soil fertility regimes] on grain protein yield, starch yield, flour yield, grain protein content and bread-making characteristics of four South African wheat cultivars
2. To test the hypothesis that wheat genotypes differ in their [potential-ability] to produce [yield and quality] under varying soil fertility situations
02/22/15
EXPERIMENTAL
Site; Hatfield Experimental Farm, Pretoria. Lat 25045’S, Long. 28016’E and elevation 1372 masl
Soil; Loamy, Luvic dark red-brown soil of the Hutton form. Clay content 35.5%, pH (KCL) 5.0 to 6.5 and of good drainage
02/22/15
EXPERIMENTAL cont
Treatments; Wheat cultivars Inia, Carina, Kariega and SST 86. Six different soil fertility plots NPKM, NPK, PK, NP, NK and Control “O” treatments from a Long-term fertilization and irrigation experiment, initiated in 1939
02/22/15
Field Plan?
02/22/15
EXPERIMENTAL cont
Design; Split-plot arrangements in a RCB replicated times, main-plot size 8.3m by 6.2m and sub-plots 8.3m by 1.2m
02/22/15
EXPERIMENTAL cont
Observations; Grain yield, 1000 kernel mass,
grain protein yield, starch yield, flour yield, grain protein content and bread-making quality characteristics (loaf-volume, water absorption, mixograph peak mixing time) was determined according to the Approved Methods of the A.A.C.C., (1986)
02/22/15
EXPERIMENTAL cont
Weather; T max < 22.10C (Aug)T min < 1.70C (July)
Rainfall May to Sept, LT average, 10.8 -15.5 mm (Figure 1)
02/22/15
RESULTS
TABLE 1-7
FIGURE 1-4
MIXOGRAPHS 1-4
02/22/15
FIGURE 1. Long-term meteorological data for Hatfield farm (1974 – 2010)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0
50
100
150
200
250
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec
Temperature (0 C)
Evaporation and rainfall (mm)
Rainfall T min T max Evap
02/22/15
TABLE 2a. Meteorological data for Hatfield Farm in 2010 and long-term mean rainfall (1974 - 2010)
02/22/15
Months Temperature(0C)
Max Min
Pan evaporation(mm/day)
Rainfall
(mm/day)
Long-term rainfall
(mm/month)
January FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
29.3 16.830.3 16.626.6 15.423.6 11.020.4 8.319.2 2.616.6 422.8 7.427.0 11.427.7 14.327.2 15.326.5 14.5
8.28.26.14.93.43.34.25.47.58.07.97.3
69.8103.4168.820.87.00.00.05.03.5
63.2213.2154.7
126.1109.098.239.711.66.53.86.6
20.271.6
105.2119.6
Year 25.0 11.5 74.4 868.8 717.6
TABLE 2b. Meteorological data for Hatfield Farm in 1995 and long-term mean rainfall (1974 - 2010)
02/22/15
Months Temperature(0C)
Max Min
Pan evaporation(mm/day)
Rainfall
(mm/day)
Long-term rainfall
(mm/month)
January FebruaryMarchAprilMayJuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
29.3 16.830.3 16.626.6 15.423.6 11.020.4 8.319.2 2.616.6 422.8 7.427.0 11.427.7 14.327.2 15.326.5 14.5
8.28.26.14.93.43.34.25.47.58.07.97.3
69.8103.4168.820.87.00.00.05.03.5
63.2213.2154.7
126.1109.098.239.711.66.53.86.6
20.271.6
105.2119.6
Year 25.0 11.5 74.4 868.8 717.6
TABLE 3. Soil analysis (0-200mm) results for experimental site, 1995
Treatment pH
(H2O)
Bray 2 P
Mg kg-1
K
Mg kg-1
NPKM
NPK
PK
NP
NK
Control “O”
5.8
5.4
6.0
5.1
5.2
6.1
109
63
43
37
1.8
1.7
120
66
92
21
81
22
CV % 3.7 46.5 49.1
02/22/15
TABLE 4. Effects of cultivar on grain protein yield, grain protein content, high-molecular weight glutenins, glu-1 score and flour yield of four South African wheat cultivars
+ within columns, means followed by the same lowercase letter had P > 0.05 and hence were not significantly different according to a Duncan’s multiple range test.1 cultivar data based on NPKM, NPK and ‘O’ fertilization2 Values for quality characteristics measured for the allelic response of chromosome 1B and 1D according to Randall et al. (1993).3 Flour yield based on the Quadrumat method.
02/22/15
Cultivar1 Grain protein yield
(kg ha-1)
Grain protein content
(dry basis)(%)
High-molecular2
weight glutenins
(HMW-GS)
Glu-1 score2
Flour yield3
(%)
SST 86
Inia
Kariega
Carina
527a+
539a
586a
873b
12.6a
12.6a
12.2a
13.1b
(13+16)(5+10)
(13+16)(5+10)
(17+18)(5+10)
-
3
3
3
-
47.7a
51.8b
53.6b
48.7a
CV % 22.3 6.9 6.2
TABLE 5. Effects of fertilization treatment on grain protein yield, grain protein content and flour yield of wheat (mean data from cultivars SST86, Inia and Kariega
+ Within columns, means followed by the same lowercase letter had P > 0.05 and hence were not significantly different according to an Duncan’s multiple range test.
1 Data based on cultivars SST 86, Inia and Kariega. 2 Flour yield based on Quadrumat method.
02/22/15
Treatment Grain protein yield
(kg ha-1)
Grain protein content
(dry basis)(%)
Flour yield2
(%)NPKM1
NPKPKNPNK‘O’ Control
898c+
854c473b366b156a143a
13.8c13.3c9.7a
10.9b11.9b10.4b
50.8b52.7bc49.2ab48.2ab54.4c46.6a
CV % 23.9 6.9 12.0
TABLE 6. Effects of cultivar on bread-making quality characteristics of two South African wheat cultivars
Cultivar Loaf-volume2
(cm3)
Mixograph water
absorption
(%)
Mixograph peak
mixing time
(min)
Dough character-
stics
Inia
Kariega
910a+
981b
62.5a
62.2a
3.68a
3.55a
Normal
Normal
CV % 1.3 1.5 3.5
+ Within columns means followed by the same lower case letter had P > 0.05 and hence were not significantly different
according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
1 Bread-making quality data based on NPK, PK, NP and NK fertilization treatments only.
2 Based on breeder’s standard 100g loaf size.
02/22/15
TABLE 7. Effects of soil fertility status on bread-making quality characteristics based on two South African wheat cultivars (mean data from cultivars Inia and Kariega)
+ within columns, means followed by the same lowercase letter had P > 0.05 and hence were not significantly
different according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
1 loaf-volume based on breeder’s standard 100g loaf size.
2 Fertilization treatments NPK, PK, NP and NK (N – nitrogen; P – phosphorus; K – potassium).
02/22/15
Treatment Loaf volume1
(cm3)
Mixograph water
absorption(%)
Mixograph peak time
(min)
Dough characteri-
stics
NPK2
PK
NP
NK
988C+
880a
980c
935b
63.3d
61.2a
62.2b
62.6c
3.5a
3.8a
3.6a
3.8a
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
CV % 1.3 1.5 3.5
TABLE 8. Effects of soil fertility on bread-making quality characteristics based on two South African wheat cultivars (mean data from cultivars Inia and Kariega)
+ Within columns, means followed by the same lowercase letter had P > 0.05 and hence were not significantly
different according to Duncan’s multiple range test.
1 Loaf-volume based on breeder’s standard 100g loaf size.
2 Fertilization treatments NPK, PK, NP and NK (N - nitrogen; P – phosphorus; K – potassium)02/22/15
Treatment Loaf volume1
(cm3)
Mixograph water
absorption
(%)
Mixograph peak time
(min)
Dough characteri
stics
NPK2
PK
NP
NK
988c+
880a
980c
935b
63.3d
61.2a
62.2b
62.6c
3.5a
3.8a
3.6a
3.8a
Normal
Normal
Normal
Normal
CV % 1.3 1.5 3.5
FIGURE 2a. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on grain protein yield (A) of three South African wheat cultivars
02/22/15
LSD (0.05)
I
FIGURE 2b. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on grain protein content (B) of three South African wheat cultivars
02/22/15
LSD (0.05)
I
FIGURE 2c. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on flour yield (C) of three South African wheat cultivars
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
NK NP PK NPK NPKM
Flour yield (%)
KARIEGA
INIA
SST 86
02/22/15
LSD (0.05)
I
FIGURE 2d. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on loaf-volume (D) of two South African wheat cultivars
02/22/15
FIGURE 2e. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on mixograph water absorption (E) of two South African wheat cultivars
02/22/15
Figure 2a –d. Dough quality (mixograms) of two wheat cultivars Inia and Kariega in response to NPK (A), PK (B), NP (C) and NK (D) Long-term fertilization
02/22/15
CONCLUSIONS 1. Under conditions of the experiment, a
correlation analysis showed that [grain protein yield] and [grain protein content] accounted for [65% ]of variation in loaf volume
2. Results indicate the existence of wheat genotypes with enhanced protein content and grain yield [contrary to the scientific theory and norm] selection for closely linked genes
02/22/15
CONCLUSIONS cont
3. Loaf volume could not be explained adequately by variation in protein content [further research may yield additional information as to the unexplained high loaf volume potential of the cv. Kariega]
4. Glue-1-score showed that, for the wheat genotypes studied, did not significantly differ [in their HMW-GS combinations]
5. The hypothesis that wheat genotypes differ and varying soil fertility affects bread-making grain quality characteristics was proven
02/22/15
FUTURE RESEARCH
1. Loaf volume -[further research may yield additional information as to the unexplained high loaf volume potential e.g.of the cv. Kariega]
2. Glue-1-score - differ [in their HMW/LMW-GS combinations]
3. That wheat [genotypes] differ in their response [soil fertility STATUS/[ENVIRON]
G X E affects bread-making quality characteristics Gene [ID] and [Marking/Sequencing]
02/22/15
REFERENCES
1. AACC, American Association of Cereal Chemists 1986 Method 46-13; Crude protein – micro Kjeldhal method. Approved Methods of AACC (8th Edition, update in use), St. Paul, Minnesota
2. BLECHL, A.E. & ANDERSON, O.D., 1998. The use of biotechnology to understand wheat functionality. Royal Chemical Society Symposium Wheat Structure, Biochemistry and Functionality, Canada. Plant Phsiol. (In press)
3. KLOPPER, F.J and PRETORIUS, Z.A., 1995. Field evaluation of leaf rust severity, yield loss and quality characteristics in near-isogenic wheat lines with Lr29, Lr35 or Lr37. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil, 12, 55
4. METHO, L.A., HAMMES, P.S., DE BEER, J.M. & GROENEVELD, H.T., 1997. Interaction between cultivar and soil fertility on grain yield, yield components and grain nitrogen content of wheat. S. Afr. J. Plant Soil. 14, 158-164
02/22/15
REFERENCES cont
5. PAYNE, P.I., HOLT, L.M., JACKSON, E.A. & LAW, C.N., 1984. Wheat storage proteins. Their genetics and their potential for maturity by plant breeding. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 304, 359-371
6. RANDALL, P.G., MANLEY, M., MCGILL, A.E.J. & TAYLOR, J.R.N., 1993. Relationship between the High Molecular subunits of glutenin
of South African wheats and end-use quality. J. Cereal Sci. 18,251- 258 7. VAN LILL, D. & PURCHASE, J.L., 1994. Directions in breeding for
winter wheat yield and quality form 1930 to 1990. Euphytica, 82, 79-87.
02/22/15
J Sci Agric /Food Chem (UK) 79: 1823- 1831
02/22/15
ABSTRACT- PUBLICATION
02/22/15
PRESENTED IN INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCES
1. 26th Congress of SASCO/SAVG,Stellenbosch - Cape Town, S Africa
2. Crop Science Society of AfricaCongressCasablanca – Morocco 1999.
3. Montreal - Canada 20054. Xhiangjing - China 2008
02/22/15
02/22/15
ASANTE SANA
FAULT FINDING.......is like WINDOW ....WASHING !.......all the DIRT seems to
be ON THE OTHER SIDE..... !!! 1. KGHALE BHUGA2. BAIE DANKIE3. MOLWENI4. SIYABONGA 5. ASANTE SANA
02/22/15