FINAL REPORT CIVIL SOCIETY MAPPING (UNDP … · 2015-04-19 · Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report i . FINAL REPORT CIVIL SOCIETY MAPPING (UNDP RWANDA). (RFP-58951-2010-017)

Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report

i

FINAL REPORT

CIVIL SOCIETY

MAPPING (UNDP RWANDA).

(RFP-58951-2010-017)

RWANDA CIVIL SOCIETY PLATFORM

Draft – 18 August 2011


ii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Abbreviations and Glossary ...................................................................................... iv Executive Summary .................................................................................................... 1 1.0 Background ........................................................................................................ 1

1.1 Understanding Civil Society Organizations .................................................... 1 1.2 Characteristics of CSOs ................................................................................. 3 1.3 Rwandan Civil Society ................................................................................... 4 1.5 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – Legal Framework .................................... 5 1.6 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – The Practice ............................................ 9 1.7 Registration and Regulation of CSOs – the Way Forward ............................ 10

2.0 Objectives and Tasks ....................................................................................... 12 2.1 Objectives of the CSO Mapping Study ......................................................... 12 2.2 Expected Results & Actual Results .............................................................. 12 2.3 Additional aspects ........................................................................................ 14

3.0 Approach .......................................................................................................... 14 3.1 – Key Benchmarks ....................................................................................... 15

4.0 Methodology ..................................................................................................... 15 4.1 Methodological Approach Employed ............................................................ 16 4.2 Approach to Data Collection ........................................................................ 17 4.3 Organisation of Data .................................................................................... 18 4.4 District Visits ................................................................................................ 20 4.5 Data verification from donors ....................................................................... 21 4.6 Data Verification .......................................................................................... 22 4.7 National Level .............................................................................................. 22 4.8 Structured Interview Tool ............................................................................. 23 4.9 Analysis ....................................................................................................... 23 4.10. Draft Report & Validation ........................................................................ 25

5.0 analysis of results - overview .......................................................................... 25 Table 1 – EDPRS sectors................................................................................... 25 Table 2 – Analysis of CSO Expenditure by EDPRS Sector ................................. 26 Graph 1 - % of Total CSO investments by EDPRS Sector .................................. 27 Table 3 – Analysis of CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by

International and Local CSOs ...................................................................... 28 Graph 2 - CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International

and Local CSOs .......................................................................................... 28 6.1 Relative CSO vs. Government Expenditure ................................................. 30 Table 4 – Comparison of CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral

Expenditure – FY 2009/2010 ....................................................................... 30 Graph 3 - CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY

2009/2010 ................................................................................................... 31 Table 5 –Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total

National Expenditure ................................................................................... 32 6.2 Relative CSO by District............................................................................... 32 Table 6 – Relative Total Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 per

District ......................................................................................................... 34 Graph 4 – Relative Sectoral Expenditure CSOs FY 2009/2010 per District ........ 35

7.0 EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ................................................................. 36 Graph 5 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ....................... 36


iii

8.0 EDPRS 2 – Defense .......................................................................................... 36 9.0 EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety ................................................................ 37

Graph 6 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety ..................... 37 10.0 EDPRS 4 – environmental protection ............................................................. 37

Graph 7– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection .................... 38 11.0 EDPRS 5 – Agriculture ..................................................................................... 38

Graph 8– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 5 - Agriculture............................................ 38 12.0 EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce ............................................................... 39

Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce ...................... 39 13.0 EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy ............................................................................ 39

Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy .................................. 39 14.0 EDPRS 8 – Fuel and energy ............................................................................. 40 15.0 EDPRS 9 – Land Housing & Community Amenities ...................................... 40

Graph 10– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 9 – land Housing & Community Amenities .................................................................................................... 40

16.0 EDPRS 10 – Water and Sanitation ................................................................... 40 Graph 11– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 10 – Water & Sanitation .......................... 40

17.0 EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports ............................................................... 41 Graph 12– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports .................... 41

18.0 EDPRS 12 – Education ..................................................................................... 41 Graph 13– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 12 - Education ......................................... 42

19.0 EDPRS 13 – Health ........................................................................................... 42 Graph 14– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 13 - Health .............................................. 43

20.0 EDPRS 14 – Social protection ......................................................................... 44 Graph 15– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 14 – Social Protection ............................. 44

21.0 CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS .................................................... 44 22.0 CONCLUSIONS ................................................................................................. 46 Annex 1 Terms of Reference .................................................................................... 48 Annex 2 Interview questionnaire .............................................................................. 52 Annex 3 EDPRS 1 – General Public Service ............................................................ 55 Annex 4 EDPRS 3 – Public )rder and Safety ............................................................ 60 Annex 5 EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection ....................................................... 64 Annex 6 EDPRS 5 – Agriculture ............................................................................... 67 Annex 7 EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce .......................................................... 74 Annex 8 EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy ....................................................................... 75 Annex 9 EDPRS 8 – Transport and Communications ............................................. 75 Annex 10 EDPRS 9 – Land Housing and Community Amenitied ........................... 76 Annex 11 EDPRS 10 – Water and Sanitation ........................................................... 78 Annex 12 EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture and Sports .................................................. 80 Annex 13 EDPRS 12 – Health ................................................................................... 82 Annex 14 EDPRS 13 – Education ............................................................................. 98 Annex 15 EDPRS 14 – Social protection ............................................................... 108


iv

ABBREVIATIONS AND GLOSSARY

ACU Aid Coordination Unit

CASE Community assisted Access to Sustainable Energy

CAVA Communities Allied against Violence and AIDS Project

CCOAIB Le Conseil de Concertation des Organisations d'Appui aux Initiatives de Base

CEJP Commission Episcopale Justice et Paix

CESTRAR Centrale des Syndicats des Travailleurs du Rwanda

CLADHO Rwandan Collective of Leagues and Associations for the Defense of Human Rights

COSMO Community Support and Mentoring for Orphans and other vulnerable

children/youth

CSO Community Based Organization

CSOs Civil Society Organization

CWASA: Community Based Water and Sanitation

ECD Early Childhood Development Project

EDPR Economic Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy

EEEGL Enterprise, Environment and Equity in the Virunga Landscape of the Great Lakes

FDI Foreign Direct Investment

FOFI Farmers of the Future Initiative

GDP Gross Domestic Product

GLAI Great Lakes Advocacy Initiative

GOR Government of Rwanda

HU USAID/Higa Ubeho

IBUKA IBUKA Mémoire & Justice

INGO International Non Governmental Organisation

LIBRAP Literacy and Basic Right Awareness

LNGO Local Non Governmental Organisation

MDG Millennium Development Goals

MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework

MINALOC Ministry of Local Government and Social. Affairs

MINECOFIN Ministry of Finance and Economic Development

MINEDUC Ministry of Education

MINISANTE Ministry of Health

PPIMA Public Policy Information Monitoring and Advocacy

RCL Roddom Consult Limited

RCSP Rwanda Civil Society Platform

RI Social Change for Family Planning Results Initiative

SAFI Sustainable Access to Financial Services for Investment

TOR Terms of Reference

UN United Nations

UNDP United Nations Development Programme


1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The overall objectives of the Civil Society Mapping Study were to contribute to -

a. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda

through aggregating the CSOs activities;

b. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and

programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;

c. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through

assessing the gaps currently exist;

d. Informing better the Government and RCSP planning process by quantifying the

CSO contribution in the national estimates;

e. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates;

f. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby

and advocacy; and

g. To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its

complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a

gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different

sectors by different stakeholders.

The expected results were –

Mapping of the activities of the CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda, detailing out

the domains of intervention and the pattern of distribution;

CSO funding information for both local and international CSOs;

Assess activities and source of funding;

Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs,

funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;

Document results and impacts of CSO activities;

Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations

constituting the CSOs;

Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in

governance, advocacy and human rights; and

Help organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft

report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the


2

draft report.

Not all of these expected results could be achieved, especially in terms of impacts of

CSO activities and employment statistics. There were many reasons for this occurring –

The data held by many of the CSOs is partial and non-descriptive.

Many CSOs do not have activity plans; those that have activity plans often do

not necessarily budget all activities separately.

CSOs generally do not have baseline surveys or impact surveys that allow for

impact determination.

CSOs do not plan and implement activities sectorally, in that most CSOs

undertake activities that have cross-sectoral impacts. Such an approach crosses

many sectors and the definition of what sector they are engaged in and what is

the expected impact are often not described.

CSOs operate on differing financial years – some use a calendar year; others the

government of Rwanda FY and others the financial year of their donor funding

source. It becomes very difficult to assess impacts within comparable periods.

For CSOs with multiple major donors, records are often kept in differing

fashions according to funding requirements. Many donors mandate the use of

their own planning, budgeting and reporting systems. This is both a major

burden on CSOs and also makes comparison and data collection very difficult.

The CSO mapping was undertaken under the direct supervision of the RSCP and in

close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in

Rwanda. Data was collected from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) and

the Directorate of Immigration which was then cross checked through CSOs, donors

and field visits. While the data may not be complete, as errors are always possible, this

mapping represents the best available information at this time.

In order to be useful as a report, the data was ordered and analysed to examine the

various CSO contributions to economic development and poverty reduction by

reference to the goals, strategies and indicators of Vision 2020 and the Economic

Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS). This places the various


3

contributions within a common structured framework that can be understood by all

stakeholders. It was against this framework that all CSO activities were analysed to

determine which sector the CSO activities fell within.

The total of CSO expenditure in Rwanda is substantial: in FY 2009-2010 it approached

RWF 254,833,597,195 (or US$428,291,760). The majority of the funds expended by

CSOs in Rwanda are overwhelmingly concentrated (88.99%) in the four sectors of

health (29.74%), education (21.08%), social protection (22.83%) and agriculture

(15.34%). While there are definitional issues in respect of the allocation of activity

expenditure to sectors, the majority of those allocation issues related to multi-purpose

expenditures (e.g. education expenditure on health related matters) within these four

sectors and misallocation of expenditure is not a substantive issue.

International CSOs expended the most substantial portion of the funds expended in

any sector, and overall, expended 75.9% of all CSO expenditure in Rwanda. In seven

EDPRS secors, total CSO expenditure exceeded 20% of total government expenditure.

Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total National Expenditure

EDPRS Sector CSO Expenditure % Total

04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 22%

05 AGRICULTURE 41%

09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 22%

11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 33%

12 HEALTH 46%

13 EDUCATION 24%

14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 60%

This clearly indicates the need for central government interaction with CSOs in respect

of the prioritization of sectoral expenditure within sectors as the level of CSO

expenditure in these sectors is a substantial proportion of the total sectoral

expenditure. This level of interaction is not evident today. Further, this also clearly

demonstrates the importance of CSOs in Rwanda in terms of overall service delivery

within the key EDPRS sectors. Given that CSOs in Rwanda have this level of


4

expenditure in terms of overall national expenditure in the key EDPRS sectoral areas, it

is recommended that the government give close and further consideration to the

formalization of interaction with CSOs on a continuing basis in order that key sectoral

investments are effectively addressed.

There is a great disparity in overall CSO expenditure by district. Gasabo (11.56%),

Bugesera (11.51%) and Kayonza (10.18%) have attracted CSO expenditure across all

sectors at rates that exceed what could normally be expected and between the three

districts account for 33.25% of all CSO expenditure across all districts. The

recommendation for consideration is that on a sectoral basis, when making district

allocations for programmes, that CSOs be advised to follow the relevant sector

strategic plans which have identified relative district needs. While this may even out

funding approaches in the future, this is not certain as it may well be that the

combined effect of all of the sector strategic plans is to result in heightened allocations

to these three districts.

A series of challenges were noted that hindering the smooth running of the overall

administration of CSOs in Rwanda. They are –

(a) Poor reporting mechanisms and schedules where by periodical reports are

supposed to be submitted to the JADF and MINALOC/IMMIGRATION but are actually

not submitted. This causes a supervision bottlenecks and poor coordination of their

activities.

(b) There is a facilitation problem both in terms of transport and communication. This

makes it difficult for the JADF PS to effectively monitor and coordinate the activities of

all CSOs operating in districts where they are in charge.

(c) There is an issue of the JADFs feeling unempowered and lacking authority in the

execution of their work. This results in them not considering that they are able to even

bring the CSO heads together in times of need in order to streamline the operations of

CSOs.

(d) There is no clear communication mechanism between MINALOC and district JADFs

and this leads to a situation where CSOs are registered at MINALOC but are not known

at the district where they operate.


5

(e) There is also no clear monitoring and evaluation mechanism of the CSO activities

from MINALOC down to the district level and Umurenge level. There is no frame work

within which the activities of these CSOs can be monitored.

(f) There is also challenge of the legal framework in respect of CSO registration and

operation. This has been dealt with elsewhere.

(g) For local CSOs, there is no steady stream of income and this makes their employees

work as volunteers.

The recommendations are-

1. That the CSO registration process be changed so that it undertaken through the

Development Assistance Database so that all CSO information is captured annually as

part of the annual registration process. This will annually update all data relating to

activates and areas of focus and will be a valuable tool for all stakeholders when

determining their selection of sectoral investments.

2. That the implementation laws necessary to implement the CSO organic law be

drafted and passed as soon as reasonably practicable so as to capture the hanged

registration process.

3. Further investigations be undertaken to determine the value for money in terms of

sectoral investments by CSOs against the respective level of central government.

4. Increase/deepen CSO involvement in the Sector Working Groups (SWGs).

5. JADFs do not feel empowered, they are weak by perception and therefore they

should be strengthened in order for them to effectively execute their duties. An

example here is the feeling of being powerless to ask for periodical reports. This is an

issue that was raised by the JADFs.

6. Improve on facilitation of the JADFs to improve coordination, monitoring and

evaluation. This is interms of transport and communication.

The CSO mapping exercise has not been definitive as it was not a census. There are

CSOs that have not been captured and there may well be classification issues in

respect of overall expenditure. However, it is clear that the recommendations in

respect of the gathering of accurate annual data in respect of CSOs must be a priority


6

matter for central government given the overall level of expenditure by CSOs in some

of the priority sectors.

The importance of this exercise for CSOs themselves in Rwanda is that the data

provided by this CSO mapping exercise demonstrates very clearly the importance of

civil society in service delivery in vital sectors within Rwanda and CSOs are to be seen

as major stakeholders in the overall development agenda. CSOs will be able to use this

data to further their discussions and interactions with development partners and

central government in terms of enhancing the focus and relevance of their activities.

Further work is required in respect of the value for money that CSOs bring to the

development agenda in Rwanda. The scope of this mapping exercise demonstrates the

importance of CSOs, but not whether they represent value for money in terms of their

activities. This can only be done by a sectoral approach which compares the activities

of central and local governments to comparable CSO activities in the each sector. This

mapping exercise offers no comment on this aspect because it was a matter that was

well outside the scope of the exercise, but this is an area that requires substantial

further consideration and is one that should be undertaken jointly by CSOs and

government to determine those areas of activity where there are advantages for

activities to be undertaken by the stakeholders.


1

1.0 BACKGROUND

1.1 Understanding Civil Society Organizations

Every community has its own distinct forms of social organization, cultural and political

traditions, as well as contemporary state and economic structures – all of which are

central to the development of civil society and shape its specific features. In Rwanda,

the organic nature of civil society formation makes it appear elusive, complex and in

some cases contested. As a result there are different meanings and interpretations

and, over time, different schools of thought have influenced theoretical debates and

empirical research. However, the concept of civil society refers to the web of social

relations that exist in the space between the state, the market (activities with the aim

of extracting profit), and the private life of families and individuals. Interlinked with the

concept of civil society is the idea of social capital: the values, traditions and networks

that enable coordination and cooperation between people. Civil Society Organisations

(CSOs), therefore involves the groupings that have qualities associated with

relationships, with values, and with organizational forms.

There have been various operational definitions for CSOs because they range from

officially constituted institutions to small, informal community groups and these

associations give expression and direction to the social-economic, political, spiritual

and cultural needs of members. Therefore, the definition of CSOs varies from one

country to the other. However, commonalities can be found in the nature and function

of CSOs. Some definitions of CSOs are useful to consider -

Definition 1: The UNDP has defined CSOs as one the three spheres of interference in

the making of democratic societies. Civil society is the sphere in which social

movements become organized. The organizations of civil society, which represent

many diverse and sometimes contradictory social interests, are shaped to fit their

social base, constituency, thematic organizations (e.g. environment, gender, human

rights) and types of activity. In Rwanda, these have included church related groups,

trade unions, cooperatives, service organizations (NGOs), community groups (CSOs)

and youth organizations as well as academic institutions.


2

Definition 2: The World Bank Social Development Department Sustainable

Development Network Report (2006) defined CSOs as the wide array of non-

governmental and not for-profit organizations that have a presence in public life,

expressing the interests and values of their members or others, based on ethical,

cultural, political, scientific, religious or philanthropic considerations. The term goes

beyond the narrower (and to many donors, more familiar) category of development-

oriented NGOs and depicts a broad range of organizations, such as community groups,

women‘s association, labor unions, indigenous groups, youth groups, charitable

organizations, foundations, faith-based organizations, independent media,

professional associations, think tanks, independent educational organizations and

social movements.

Definition 3: CIVICUS defines CSOs as the arena between family, government and

market where people voluntarily associate to advance their common interest.

Definition 4: Academics have defined CSOs as those informal, semiformal or formal

organizational formations that protect, promote and facilitate principles and practices

of democracy, participation, pluralism, rights, equity, justice and peace and among the

people locally, nationally or internationally. Such CSOs plays an ethical and political

role within the society in attempts to humanize an increasingly dehumanized world.

They also function outside the conventional spaces of state power and market forces,

though they constantly negotiate, pressurize and persuade the institutions of the state

as well as the market to be more responsible and responsive to the needs and rights of

the people in general and the marginalized poor in particular.

From the brief elaborations above, therefore, it is possible to understand that there is

a wide range of definitions attached to the notion of civil society among contemporary

scholars of the subject. A succinct operational definition of CSOs in this context includes

all non-state actors excluding the market. In other words CSOs in the Rwandan context

are those formal organisations or institutions existing in the intermediary space

between the states on the one hand and the lowest unit of social life, the family, on the

other. Moreover they organize with specific objectives to construct common benefits

and promote the interest of their constituency or beneficiaries. Thus, CSOs should

ideally combine NGOs, trade unions, professional associations, interest groups, mass


3

organizations (youth, women and other groups associations), as well as community

based organizations.

1.2 Characteristics of CSOs

Autonomy: Political and sociological definitions of CSOs agree on the centrality of

autonomy as a CSO characteristic, and this is usually referred to as the freedom and

independence of civil organizations to set their own agenda without the direct

intervention or dictation from external forces, especially the state. In reality CSOs exist

not in a vacuum but in historical, political, and socio-economic contexts and their

autonomy is circumscribed by these contextual factures. Autonomy may, therefore, be

relative: a matter of degree and subject to negative or positive change. Furthermore,

CSOs interact with other organized social forces including donor communities and

other civic organizations, which circumscribe and limit their ability to act

independently.

Voluntarism: CSOs vary from small membership organizations, mainly engaged in self-

help activities, to large and medium scale organizations engaged in all sorts of service,

development and advocacy activities. Accordingly, they exhibit differences in their

style of organization, internal democracy, and level of membership participation. The

self image of CSOs as democratic, participatory and accountable needs close

inspection. However, voluntary membership and participation is one of the important

characteristics and principles of CSOs.

Plurality: The notion of plurality indicates not only the large number and types of

associations and organizations occupying the sphere but also the diversity of interest

objectives, organizational forms and capacities. Academics have noted that civil society

is not a uniform and homogeneous group of institutes. On the contrary, the

institutions of CSOs are myriad of particular interests, which have an institutional form

or an institutional expression. They express conflicts, rivalries, and struggles – or

consented action. They may act as integrating or disintegrating elements.


4

Trust and solidarity: Trust and solidarity refers to the reciprocal mutuality and

confidence individual members place on the reliability of the behaviour and actions of

fellow members. As civic associations grow in size and complexity, trust and solidarity

become diluted and assume more abstract and remote characteristics.

1.3 Rwandan Civil Society

Rwandan Civil Society has been in existence from 1956 when its first segments were

established in form of farmers associations who were answerable to the church. It

grew to sizable proportions when several associations, Community Based

Organizations (CSOs), Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), formed umbrellas that

brought together NGOs and CSOs with common interest.

This organizational set up left Community Service Organizations (CSOs) deprived of the

capacity to coordinate and engage with different partners .This gap made the CSOs not

only perceived as weak but also vulnerable. Motivated by a desire to combine their

efforts to contribute to the integral development of the country and promotion of the

rule of law, 8 umbrellas (listed below) initiated the idea of setting up a platform that

would enable them to achieve their mission. These include;

Le Conseil de Concertation des Organisations d'Appui aux Initiatives de Base

(CCOAIB),

Centrale des Syndicats des Travailleurs du Rwanda (CESTRAR),

Rwandan Collective of Leagues and Associations for the Defence of Human

Rights (CLADHO),

IBUKA Mémoire & Justice,

the Union IMBARAGA,

Commission Episcopale Justice et Paix (CEJP),

THE PRESS HOUSE, and

PRO-FEMMES TWESE HAMWE.

Thereafter, seven other umbrellas and organization networks became members. This

was realized at the Constituent Assembly held on July 9, 2004 when CSO members

came together and formed the Rwanda Civil Society Platform-(RCSP) that brings

together all actors of the civil society. It was created as a framework for exchange and


5

dialogue between member organizations and between the latter and their partners.

The RCSP’s mission is to serve as a framework for dialogue, reflection on common

issues, information exchange, mutual support and reinforcement and build a valid

interlocutor to various partners of the civil society. The objectives of the RCSP are;

a. Promote solidarity and harmonize relations between civil society organizations;

b. Analyze the context and challenges the population of Rwanda has faced and /or

is facing with a view to adopt common position and strategy for specific

actions;

c. Establish and maintain an information and communication system to enable

the civil society to achieve its mission in close collaboration with all partners;

d. Develop an effective partnership at national, regional and international levels;

e. Perform the representation and advocacy mandate of the Civil Society.

Despite the establishment of the RSCP, organizations and umbrella activities remained

individualized and isolated and their location, nature and, quantities remained

unknown. This made the civil society overall contribution to national development

shrouded in mystery and hence the doubt of the usefulness of the CSO as

development partners.

The survey is to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their

quantities to assess and consider the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of

the civil society in national economic development and poverty reduction. This will not

only help the RSCP but also the government and Development Partners by providing

useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by CSOs. This will include

activities undertaken by Local NGOs (LNGOs) and those International NGOs (INGOs)

that implement activities at the grassroots.

1.5 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – Legal Framework

The registration of CSOs in Rwanda is controlled by two laws; Law N° 20/2000 of 27

July 2000 Relating to Non-profit Making Organizations and Law N° 55/2008 of 10 July

2008 Governing Non-Governmental Organisations.


6

Law No 55/2008 is a short law but is meant to operate as an organic law that requires

other implementing to be passed and until that is passed, Law No 20/2000 continues

to operate. Law 55/2008 was promulgated on 10 September 2008 and governs non-

governmental organisations, which are organizations not established by the

Government but which work for the general interest, which in turn is defined as

activities carried out by physical persons or legal entities that gather their skills and

efforts in order to promote the population’s social welfare. Non-governmental

organizations operating in Rwanda are categorized as follows:

local non-governmental organizations;

international non-governmental organizations; and

religious organizations.

A specific law is required to determine the organization and functioning of each

category, but no laws have been passed to date and the savings provisions keep Law

No 20/2000 in force until those laws are passed.

Law 20/2000 applies to non-profit making organizations is any grouping having legal

entity, governed by civil law, constituted by physical or by moral entities which aim at

social works and which decide to put in common, and in a permanent way, their

knowledge or their activity for a goal other than making profit. Every association of

persons applying for legal entity as a non-profit making organization must beforehand

present its aims and plan of action to the district at the place it intends to base and

operate, in order for it, to get the provisional agreement of the district. This plan of

action is required to –

show the means held by members or advocated by the organization in meeting

its aims; and

attach a nominal list of all members of the grouping with each one’s signature.

The decision of the district is to be made and notified within a three months' period

from application.


7

The decision to register a non-profit making organization is in fact the decision to grant

legal entity status to the association by the Minister holding the portfolio of justice.

That ministerial decision is to be made within 6 months from the deposit of the

application with the Minister. The statutes of the non-profit making organization are

required to include the following –

the organisation name;

the headquarters and complete address;

the objective(s) for which the organization was formed;

the area(s) of activity;

the assets;

the assets’ disposal provisions in case of dissolution;

the rules to be followed in modifying the statutes;

the procedure to convene a General Assembly; and

modalities to gain or to lose membership.

An organization recognized as a legal entity is required to be administered by one or

several legal representatives chosen from among the duly registered members by the

latter's majority and the legal representatives are to be approved by the Minister

having Justice in his portfolio and published in the Official Gazette of the Republic of

Rwanda. Every other application posterior to the organization's constitution seeking

the approval of a legal representative or a substitute is required to be signed by the

majority of all the duly registered members sitting in its General Assembly.

All associations must publish in the Official Gazette of the Republic of Rwanda the

following:

the association’s statutes and any modification;

the act approving the legal representatives and/or substitute legal

representatives, starting their names, forenames, professions, home or

residence (address);

the resolutions by the majority of the General Assembly and court

decisions relating to the organization dissolution, conditions of


8

liquidation and appointment of liquidators together with their names,

home or residence addresses.

Every non-profit making organization registered outside of Rwanda and wishing to

undertake activities within Rwandan is required to be authorized before undertaking

any activities. The application must include –

the nature of anticipated activities;

the implementation schedule and its various stages of planning;

the targeted population and the area where activities will take place;

detailed cost estimates with data;

means available - material, human and financial;

means expected and their origin;

results anticipated at end of activity; and

contemplated successors for the launched activities or the executed

works at the association's winding up.

To be attached to this application are a copy of the association's authenticated

statutes, every document stating its agreement and eventually, all information relating

to its geographical establishment throughout the world. The granting of the authority

is subject to –

adequacy between planned activities and the means availed or

expected;

the benefit of the activities' impact on the population,; and

the commitment to achieve the proposed objectives.

Monitoring and evaluation of all non-profit making organization shall be carried out by

the relevant district and the district may at any time ask any CSO to give it all data and

documents concerning its activities. A CSO is bound to satisfy such a request within

one month.

Foreign registered CSOs are to be registered with the Ministry having the Local

Administration in its portfolio upon presentation of the acquired working permit.


9

Every CSO working in Rwanda shall submit, latest on April 30 of each year, a detailed

report of its achievements and its balance-sheet and financial situation for the ended

exercise. The annual report is required to indicate the achieved activities in the plan

submitted at the authorization request or for the provisional agreement to exercise

those activities on the Rwandan territory. Copies of the reports are required to be

submitted to the relevant districts and the Ministers having local government, justice,

international cooperation and foreign affairs within in their portfolios

Districts are required by 31 May to forward to the Ministers having in their portfolios

the non-profit organization's fields of activity concerned, a brief report on these

associations' performance, their property and their accounts within the exercise

concerned. Every Minister having in portfolio the activities of one or several non-profit

making organizations, shall send to the Cabinet latest on June 30 of each year, a

concise report on the achievements and the situation of these associations.

These laws are substantially under review and additional laws have been drafted and

passed through various stages of legislative approval in order to implement the new

organic law.

1.6 Registration of CSOs in Rwanda – The Practice

The practice of CSO registration in Rwanda varies completely from the legal

framework. Rwandan CSOs are required to register annually with the Ministry of Local

Government (MINALOC) and foreign CSOs are required to register with the Director-

General of Immigration.

Inspection of the registration records of CSOs at MINALOC demonstrated as follows –

Districts have no role in respect of CSO registration;

Few, if any, CSOs provide details as to activities, budgets, staffing, sources of

funding or staffing;

Registration details are not shared with districts within which the CSOs are to

be registered;


10

Monitoring of CSOs is not carried out by MINALOC;

The legal processes of appointing legal representatives is not carried out;

No reports are provided by districts to the relevant line ministries in respect of

the activities of CSOs in their districts;

Recording of registration details was inconsistent and not easily acceptable.

Inspection of the records at the Director General of Immigrations Office demonstrated

a more standardised recording process, but otherwise was not dissimilar to the

circumstances observed at MINALOC.

At a district level, the experience in respect of CSO legal compliance is varied. In no

district was there observable evidence of application to the districts for relevant

permission to operate. There was no evidence in any district of monitoring and

evaluation by the district of the activities of CSOs operating within their district. Some

districts had extensive records of basic details of CSOs operating in their districts, while

other districts held no records. Districts did not report to line ministries in respect of

CSO activities within their districts.

It is clear that the purpose of the Organic Law for CSO registration and regulation is a

solid concept, but the subsidiary laws have not been passed an, as far as can be

determined, have not been drafted or further contemplated.

1.7 Registration and Regulation of CSOs – the Way Forward

The Government of Rwanda has a fundamental interest in the registration and

regulation of CSOs operating in Rwanda. This interest has a variety of aspects,

including security and economic planning. To be effective, registration and regulation

of CSOs must be centralised, encompassing, transparent and allow for efficient

monitoring and evaluation.

In terms of ministerial mandates, MINALOC is clearly the ministry which has the

mandate in respect of CSO activities because these activities are carried out at a

district level. This mandate must be tempered by the interests of relevant line


11

ministries in respect of CSO sectoral activities. However, the Ministry of Finance and

Economic Planning (MINECOFIN) has a major interest in the fiscal impacts of CSO

sectoral investments.

Monitoring and evaluation of CSO activities is a difficult matter as there are so many

activities undertaken. For there to be effective M&E of these activities requires that a

solid and substantial data base exists of annual CSO activities. M&E also takes several

forms – the physical and the financial. The physical M&E is a matter for the relevant

line ministries in close engagement with MINALOC. The financial is a matter for both

the line ministries and MINECOFIN. The line ministry financial interest is in respect of

ensuring value for money is attained from CSO activities. The MINECOFIN interest is

that in terms of planning and budgeting, it is essential that MINECOFIN has verifiable

data in respect of all CSO activities.

There does exist a very cost-effective method of ensuring that these interests are all

met. MINECOFIN operates a Development Assistance Database (DAD) which is meant

to record all non-government development assistance. It is a very straight forward

matter for the registration details of all CSOs in Rwanda to be registered by the CSOs

themselves directly into the DAD. It would be a requirement of having entered all of

the required details into the DAD for MINALOC to issue a registration certification. As

the DAD is open to any user to inspect, it becomes a transparent and method of

ensuring CSO registrations are handled in a comprehensive manner. Registration of a

CSO would therefore depend on the CSOs themselves providing all required

information, with no further input requirements by the government.

The benefits of this approach are that it requires no new systems to be introduced and

it satisfies the information needs of both central and local governments. It is already

necessary to draft and pass the necessary laws to implement the organic CSO law and

this is a matter of priority for the Government of Rwanda which can be attended to

promptly to ensure that registration processes are all-encompassing and provide the

details required in a fashion that will allow for substantive M&E to be undertaken.


12

This will require an immediate reconsideration of the laws currently being moved

through the approval system so as to be able to incorporate these reforms.

2.0 OBJECTIVES AND TASKS

2.1 Objectives of the CSO Mapping Study

The overall objectives of the Civil Society Mapping Study are to contribute to -

h. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda

through aggregating the CSOs activities;

i. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and

programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;

j. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through

assessing the gaps currently exist;

k. Informing better the Government and RCSP planning process by quantifying the

CSO contribution in the national estimates;

l. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates;

m. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby

and advocacy; and

n. To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its

complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a

gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different

sectors by different stakeholders.

2.2 Expected Results & Actual Results

The expected results were –

Mapping activities of the CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda, detailing out the

domain of intervention and come up with the pattern of their distribution;

Gather flow of CSO funding information for both LNGOs and INGSOs

(disbursement information) and activities from relevant Government and

district entities (i.e. MINALOC, Directorate General of Immigration and

Emigration) and from CSO organizations;

Assess activities and source of their funding;

Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs,


13



Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations

constituting the Civil Society;

Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in


Help organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft

report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the

draft report.

Not all of these expected results could be achieved, especially in terms of impacts of

CSO activities and employment statistics. There were many reasons for this occurring.

Firstly the data held by many of the CSOs is partial and non-descriptive. Many CSOs do

not have activity plans; those that have activity plans often do not necessarily budget

all activities separately; CSOs generally do not have baseline surveys or impact surveys

that allow for impact determination. Not all CSOs operate in such a fashion, but it is a

more usual that not scenario. Secondly, CSOs do not plan and implement activities

sectorally, in that most CSOs undertake activities that have cross-sectoral impacts. For

instance, a CSO may work with deprived children by paying school fees, undertaking

education activities in respect of health and rights issues and by engaging in promoting

sports. Such an approach crosses many sectors and the definition of what sector they

are engaged in and what is the expected impact are often not described.

Secondly, CSOs operate on differing financial years – some use a calendar year; others

the government of Rwanda financial year and others the financial year of their donor

funding source. It becomes very difficult to assess impacts within comparable periods.

Thirdly, for CSOs with multiple major donors, records are often kept in differing

fashions according to funding requirements. Many donors mandate the use of their

own planning, budgeting and reporting systems. This is both a major burden on CSOs

and also makes comparison and data collection very difficult.


14

2.3 Additional aspects

From the point of view of the stakeholders, there has not been sufficient level of

dialogue between the CSOs in Rwanda and key stakeholders including the government

itself. There is also a general feeling that there is a gap created by lack of sufficient

information about the activities of the CSOs in Rwanda and their contribution to the

national development agenda laid out the EDPRS and the Vision 2020. This should not

be the case as the CSO are perceived as a key pillar to deliver national goals and

development.

CSOs are a key channel for development aid. Therefore the concern is that aid

effectiveness in respect of CSO activities and its contribution to the development

agenda is not documented. This mapping exercise responds to these concerns and –

informs the level of understanding for the CSOs to better engage the

government in the development arena;

measures the CSOs activities/contributions by documenting CSO actions; and

informs the level of understanding of the CSOs’ sectoral economic contribution.

3.0 APPROACH

The CSO mapping was undertaken under the direct supervision of the RSCP and in

close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in

Rwanda to -

a. Map out activities of CSOs in all the districts of Rwanda and their

interventions and come up with the pattern of their distribution;

b. Establish accurate CSO funding information and activities from relevant

Government and district entities and CSOs;

c. Assess activities and sources of their funding;

d. Meet members of CSOs district by district to discuss their programs,


e. Document results and impacts of CSO activities;

f. Determine employment statistics within individual CSOs;

g. Gather qualitative information on the activities of CSOs working in


15


h. Assist to organize and moderate a national workshop to present and discuss

and validate the draft report.

The data was collected from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) by

attending at the Ministry and receiving their electronic data records. These were then

checked by the physical examination of every registration received and recorded by

MINALOC for the relevant period. The data that was available from the registration

documents was generally not compliant with the existing legal framework in respect of

the information that was required to be provided, in particular in respect of salaries

paid, assets owned and donor/funding sources.

The data that collected from the Department of Immigration was the electronic record

of the registrations held by the department and then a physical examination of every

record held by the department to verify the electronic record. This data was then cross

checked at a later time by the annual reports that were filed with the department

3.1 – Key Benchmarks

Key benchmarks Date

Contract signing 23/12/2010

Present Inception Report 08/01/ 2011

Complete field work 30/03/2011

Draft report submitted 18/04/2011

Stakeholder Workshop TBD

Final report submitted TBD

The draft report was submitted after the date detailed above due to delays in accessing data responses from stakeholders.

4.0 METHODOLOGY

A participatory methodology was used involving different stake holders. This mapping

exercise was a particularly challenging task because it required the consultants to not

only establish the activities and funding of the various CSOs (national and


16

international) within Rwanda but also to establish the relevance and value for money

of the activities undertaken and the funds expended. The consultants obtained obtain

this buy-in from the CSOs by obtaining from the appropriate Government of Rwanda

agency the appropriate sanction and adoption of this mapping exercise as a matter of

government policy. This support went a long way to overcoming the potential

reluctance of CSOs to divulge the required information

4.1 Methodological Approach Employed

In accordance to the above objectives, the bottom line objective of the mapping

exercise was to measure the contribution of the CSOs to Rwanda’s development

agenda. In order to be as comprehensive as possible, the mapping exercise study was

taken in three stages. The first stage involved visiting the umbrella or platform

organizations involved with CSOs, local and international, with the aim of

understanding the nature and structure of Rwanda’s CSOs from the platform point of

view.

The second stage was to visit the Ministry of Local Government and Social affairs

(MINALOC) and the Immigration Directorate were local CSOs and international CSOs

are, respectively, registered. This was a necessary step because all the locally

registered CSOs and the international CSOs are required to obtain an authorisation

certificate from MINALOC and Immigration, respectively, before they are operational

in Rwanda. To obtain registration and therefore obtain a practicing certificate, the

CSOs are required to provide specific information about the contact address and

location operation, the amount of money (yearly budgets) involved, the sector or the

intended activities and prospective donors. This stage also involved contacting the

development partners or donor community that are directly involved in supporting the

CSO or CSOs in Rwanda in order to validate the information obtained. This involved

two ways that were effective; one was to obtain the data from the DAD data base and

the other was to approach the major donor communities directly, such as the UNDP,

USAID, DFID, GTZ, EU and the bilateral donor community. The later proved to be more

effective because not all the donors update their contributions via the DAD database

website but also allowed contacting the headquarters themselves directly.


17

The third stage involved physical visits to the districts where the CSO are on the

ground and operational. This meant visiting district by district to take stock of the

CSO’s operations in the districts including the district JADFs in person in order to

obtain all the details of the CSOs operating in their respective districts.

4.2 Approach to Data Collection

Using the approach narrated above, data was gathered from Immigration Department

(for international CSOs) and MINALOC (for local CSOs) using a stock-taking approach of

noting the address, district of operation, the yearly budget, sector and activities and

the prospective donor(s).

For the international CSOs, the information was better organized than the local CSOs.

The material filed by the international CSOs was generally more complete and

responsive to the requirements for information provision that the local CSOs. The local

CSO data at MINALOC was difficult to obtain because the information filed by local

CSOs was generally not responsive to a common format not had the data been

electronically entered in a consistent and common format. The team at MINALOC in

charge of organizing the data was still compiling the data for the relevant period and

the electronic form of the data, on examination, was not complete or consistent with

the data from the hard copies that had been filed by the local CSOs.

Therefore, the data collection team was faced with large volumes of fragmented and

unorganised hard copies of the material filed by local CSOs. The team therefore had a

burden of reorganizing all of the data for analysis and this meant fresh stocktaking of

all the local CSOs registered at MINALOC and extracting specific information such as

addresses, districts where they operate, the activities, sector of intervention, the

budget involved and the supporting donors from each one of the hard copies that had

been filed. It was a very cumbersome and tedious exercise to go through all the

registered CSOs and extract the kind of information relevant to the exercise. This was

made more difficult because the data had not been provided by the local CSOs in a

common format and this required almost all of the hard copies of the documents filed


18

to be read in full. Additionally, material within individual submissions was also not

internally consistent and required reconciliation which slowed the process of data

collection.

4.3 Organisation of Data

A stock taking format was used that is easy to understand and comprehensive enough

to capture all the details necessary for the execution of this assignment. It is worth

noting that the core objective of the CSOs mapping exercise was to measure the

contribution of the local and international CSOs to Rwanda’s development agenda and

more specifically their contribution to the EDPRS implementation, thus the

information/data collected were posted to the respective 14 EDPRS sectors. The table

designed looks as follows and is the form that is used in the various annexes.

CSO Name Local or

Internation

al

Registered

(Yes/No)

Activities Districts of

Operation

Budget as

reported

Budget

in FRW

The table captures the name of the CSO, its status in terms of being local or

international, registration status, the core activities that particular CSO is engaged in.

These activities are what worked as guideline to establish the sector of intervention or

EDPRS sector a particular CSO was involved in. The table also captures the district of

operation, and the budgetary allocations associated with each CSO.

Data entry using this format required some assumptions and interpretations to be

made which had an impact on the allocation of the CSO activities within the EDPRS

framework.

Most all CSOs described their activities with precision and it was often unclear

as to which category the activities should be place. For instance, a CSO

undertaking education in respect of an agriculture related matter could be

placed within agriculture or education. In these cases the activity was entered

under the prime apparent area of operation from the material filed by the CSO.

This will inevitably lead to errors in classification from the perception of an

individual CSO, but given the poor CSO response rate to the request for


19

comments on the draft study report, it must be assumed that the CSOs have no

objection to the classifications generally.

In respect of districts of operation, many of the filings were not precise as to

the districts. In the analysis of the results, it will be seen that there was a

preponderance of activities focused on the Kigali districts. It has been

commented that this reflects an error in data collection as this preponderance

is caused by the place of the office of the CSO and not the district of operation.

This is not the case as the error, if any, lies in the CSOs who completed the

registration forms. The forms are quite clear as to what is required and if a CSO

gave its district of operation as one of the Kigali Districts and the material in the

registration forms did not evidence operations in any other district, then the

entry of a CSO as operating within the Kigali districts is a valid entry. This is

what was done in respect of the data entry.

Many CSOs operate in multiple districts, but their budgets do not disaggregate

activities and expenses between districts. Experience has shown that most

CSOs could not disaggregate district activity costs with precision as it would

require proportionate allocation of assets and main administration costs to be

able to do so. Therefore, for the purpose of analysis, where a CSO stated that it

operated in multiple districts, the budget for that CSO was split between all of

the districts on a pro rata basis.

Some CSOs stated that they engaged in multi-sectoral activities without

disaggregating the activities in terms of budget. Most of these CSOs (although

not all) engaged in multi-sectoral activities as a consequence of supporting the

prime activity. For instance, a CSO concerned with youth issues or social

protection, may engage in agriculture, education and other training activities.

In these cases the CSO was ranked under agriculture as the prime area of focus.

Data was manually entered into different EDPRS Sectors basing on the activity that is

carried out by a particular CSO. Take the example of the health sector, all CSOs active

in health interventions were captured under EDPRS 12. By doing this, all international

and local CSOs intervening in the same EDPRS Sector were captured with all the

information pertaining them including their budgetary figures for all the 14 EDPRS


20

Sectors. This allowed the generation of the contribution of each CSO in each EDPRS

Sector and the total contribution of each CSO per EDPRS Sector. Data was captured

using the above tool for all local CSOs per sector then after the international CSOs

followed.

By using this approach, it became possible to determine sectoral expenditure per

district. This was not a straight forward calculation as the data entry format had

clustered the districts and the data lines then had to be disaggregated for each CSO

and by every district so that it was possible to sum the sector expenditures on a district

basis. As is noted above, this required assumptions to be made in respect of data

entry.

4.4 District Visits

The most involving work was the physical visits to all of the districts. The purpose of

the visits was to verify the data gathered in respect of the CSOs from MINALOC and the

Directorate of Immigration. The visits were very useful and more CSOS that had not

been provided by MINALOC and Immigration were identified and the details recorded.

MINALOC and District JADFs were quite vocal in respect of the constraints faced by

them in the supervision of CSOs and these can be generalized as follows;

It is believed by MINALOC that most CSOs are hesitant to reveal their entire

information especially the budget breakdown required at the time of

registration. This results in either the understatement of the budgets or the

lack of budget breakdown. While the issue of budget understatement is not

capable of verification, the failure to breakdown the details of the budgets as

required was quite marked and noticeable when the data was being collected.

It was the usual case that local CSOs did not disaggregate wages or related

costs and expenditures. It should be noted that while the disaggregation was

not provided, the matter was also not followed up by MINALOC.

At the district level, the availability of information to the District JADFs in

respect to CSO is a major issue as most District JADFs have a complete absence

of detailed data and information on the CSOs, especially regarding the budgets

and donors involved.


21

Some of the CSOs do not respect the law when it comes to compulsory

registration. A case in point is the practice of some local CSOs which resurface

just for the sake of targeting available donor money. For example, one local

CSO in Bugesera was witnessed by the data collection team turning up to

register because it came to be aware that the Global Fund was sponsoring the

local CSOs to run some projects. The District JADFs state that such CSOs

disappear on receiving the donor money and never report back with progress

reports on activities.

CSOs that are donor funded are obliged to regularly report to the Donors and

not the JADFs. The JADFs miss out on the vital information regarding the CSOs

activities at the district level. The officials at MINALOC and Immigration face

the same problem with respect to insufficient availability of reports in respect

of CSO activities.

At the district level, some of the Districts do not yet have JADFs whilst in some

others the JADFs are typically new to the extent that they have not managed to

capture systematic CSOs data.

At the district level, most JADFs encounter a refusal of CSOs to release

employment data. This is not to be unexpected because even on registration,

most CSOs do not release the data required in respect of employment.

4.5 Data verification from donors

In order to cross-check the relevant data, the team contacted all known donors by

email, with follow-up communications, in order to check the CSOs that were funded by

the donors on Rwanda. Very few donors responded at all, but of the few that did,

useful information was gained. In one case, the team was requested to visit the offices

of a donor where these matters were discussed and despite that meeting, the

information was still not provided. There were notable exceptions to this in that some

donors did provide substantive and useful information, but the result was generally

poor. It is regrettable that the donors were not more communicative over these

matters as it would have provided a useful additional check on the data quality.


22

4.6 Data Verification

In order to verify the data in the draft study report, the various platforms circulated a

copy of the draft report among members for comment. The response rate was very

low. Some international CSOs identified concerns with data and these were corrected,

but there was a limited response from local CSOs. As a consequence, the team was

directed to visit the major local CSOs and verify the data for them. In conjunction with

the RCSP, contact was made with the various CSOs and the results were less than

fruitful and the information was not generally provided for cross checking. The team

also visited the Directorate of Immigration and they checked the available data against

their data base and have verified the data.

The consequence is that the data contained in this report is the best available data and

has been cross-checked as far as it is possible to do so within the limits of co-operation

given. There will be errors in the data, as such matters are unavoidable despite all best

efforts, but the data does represent an overall accurate picture of the current situation

in Rwanda.

4.7 National Level

National level officials from the Ministry of Local Government (MINALOC) and the

Department for Immigration, donors and national CSO peak organisations were

interviewed to initially identify the potential lists of all CSOs operating in Rwanda and

their areas of sectoral operations. From the Government of Rwanda, details of all

registered CSOs were obtained and to this was added the unregistered CSOs that were

discovered through field work. Donors were asked to confirm details of all CSOs

funded by them as a cross-check of CSOs, but in general, the donor response to

information requests was poor, despite numerous requests. Notable exceptions were

USAID, DFID, all UN agencies and the Royal Netherlands Embassy which all provided

detailed and useful information.

The registration information of CSOs available for within the Government of Rwanda

was not completely entered electronically and all of the registration information had

to be re-entered as part of this mapping exercise to be able to access the data. In the


23

section above on CSO registration processes, these issues are dealt with at length.

4.8 Structured Interview Tool

RC created a structured interview tool to enable a harmonised interview process. This

tool covered legal and institutional framework, sectoral activities, budgets, annual

activities and reports (including evaluation reports) & employment structure and

history. The first draft of this tool is annexed to this Inception Report. The consultants

visited every district and carried out the survey and mapping of all of the CSOs in each

district.

4.9 Analysis

In order to be useful as a report, the data was ordered and analysed to examine the

various CSO contributions to economic development and poverty reduction by

reference to the goals, strategies and indicators of Vision 2020 and the Economic

Development and Poverty Reduction Strategy (EDPRS). This places the various

contributions within a common structured framework that can be understood by all

stakeholders.

Some stakeholders believe that the EDPRS is not the best framework to assess all

activities performed by civil society. The EDPRS provides, on this view, an excellent

framework to assess service delivery provided by CSOs, however, some CSOs carry out

other activities such as advocacy, peacebuilding, dialogue and reconciliation, human

rights, media etc. These types of activities do not fit in any of the EDPRS areas and

therefore the use of a broader framework such as Vision 2020 (which includes

governance) or MDGs to complement the EDPRS sectors is more appropriate. This

view has merit but any mapping needs a base reference point that allows for efficient

anf effective comparison. The only current comparison that is possible is the EDPRS as

that is the mechanism through which the Vision 2020 is implemented and also is the

framework for the national budget that allows for comparison of expenditures.

This framework was also considered inappropriate by some stakeholders in reference

to some CSO activities that can require a relatively small budget and still have a big


24

impact (e.g. advocacy activities to improve a law or awareness raising activities cost

much less than building and running a health centre). On this view, the current

framework of analysis assumes that a bigger expenditure means a higher level of

activities which is misleading. The point that must be understood is that almost

without exception, CSOs in Rwanda lack any baselines that were taken prior to the

commencement of activities against which impact can be assessed. Further, most CSOs

also do not undertake post activity completion monitoring and evaluation to

determine levels of impact. This is to be understood in the context of the costs of such

evaluations, but without these essential baselines, allegations of CSO activity impact

are merely anectdotal and the only baseline for comparision that is available today is

financial. Greater expenditure does not, of course, assume greater impact. One of the

major drawbacks in respect of this survey was, in view of the complete absence of

baseline data, the inabity to conduct a value for money survey in respect of CSO

activities, particularly when compared to those activities that are also undertaken by

government..

The analysis, against each strategy and indicator of VISION 2020 and the EDPRS,

compares each CSOs contribution to the attainment of those goals and the value for

money in attaining those goals. As most CSOs do not have baseline data against which

to measure contribution and that data, if available, is often not disaggregated

sufficiently to allow for comparisons.

The analysis identifies -

a. the available funding on a sectoral basis for all of the activities undertaken so

that overall fiscal investments can be determined against outcomes, and

b. any overlaps or inconsistencies in the totality of CSO activities.

The only available and relatively complete date was in respect of FY 2009-2010. This

was because some CSOs ran FYs as calendar years and other adopted donor FYs and

this required aggregation of data to link the data back to a completed FY of the

Government of Rwanda. As the FY overlaps were so substantial, the reference year of

FY 2009-2010 was used as the only common year for which data was available or could

be referenced back to from all FYs. This is better understood when the FYs are


25

considered – the Government of Rwanda use July-June; the calendar year runs

January-December; some donor FYs are October-September and others use April-

March. This means that data had to be disaggregated into a standard year and using

the Government of Rwanda FY meant that the consultants had to extract data covering

three FYs (in whole or part).

4.10. Draft Report & Validation

The draft study report was circulated amongst all stakeholders by the platforms in

order to gain inputs. There were few responses from local CSOs raising concerns or

issues, but in order to ensure data validity, the largest of the local CSOs were

approached again to confirm the validity of the data.

In respect of the international CSOs, concerns were expressed as to the validity of the

data. The Department of Immigration was again approached after the initial data was

collected and every filing by all international CSOs for the registrations commencing

February 2011 that contain the annual reports for 2010 were again checked for data

accuracy with officials of the Department of Immigration. Amendments were made as

necessary.

A consultative workshop was held on 26 July 2011 and all stakeholders were given

until 9 August to make any written comments in respect of the validity of the data.

Some coments were received and all comments were incorporated. The report was

delayed by a few days because notwithstanding the cut-off date, major comments

were received from stakeholders very late and these were nevertheless incorporated.

5.0 ANALYSIS OF RESULTS - OVERVIEW

The EDPRS consists of 14 Sectors – as are listed in the Table1 below.

Table 1 – EDPRS sectors

EDPRS SECTORS

01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE

02 DEFENSE

03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION


26

EDPRS SECTORS

05 AGRICULTURE

06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE

07 FUEL AND ENERGY

08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION

09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES

10 WATER AND SANITATION

11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS

12 HEALTH

13 EDUCATION

14 SOCIAL PROTECTION

The EDPRS sectors above do not exactly tally with those used by CSOs, but these are

the published EDPRS sectors on the MINECOFIN website and unless officially chaged,

these are the sectors that the report will use. To change the secotral calculations is a

stricht forward matter, as and when they are changed officially.

It was against this framework that all CSO activities were analysed to determine which

sector the CSO activities fell within. The analysis of all of the CSO expenditure by

sectors is listed in Table 2 below.

Table 2 – Analysis of CSO Expenditure by EDPRS Sector EDPRS SECTORS International RWF Local RWF Total RWF Total US$ % Total

Investment


9,292,808,094 2,506,529,693 11,799,337,787 19,830,820 4.63%

02 DEFENSE 0 0 0 0 0.00%

03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

2,387,107,049 1,066,914,045 3,454,021,094 5,805,077 1.36%

04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

1,869,591,835 1,801,940,343 3,671,532,178 6,170,642 1.44%

05 AGRICULTURE 33,052,121,103 6,045,169,657 39,097,290,760 65,709,732 15.34%

06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE

1,652,003,110 93,723,044 1,745,726,154 2,933,994 0.69%

07 FUEL AND ENERGY

31,931,270 84,826,432 116,757,702 196,231 0.05%

08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION

0 0 0 0.00%

09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES

75,137,195 1,331,813,422 1,406,950,617 2,364,623 0.55%


2,381,609,498 197,712,631 2,579,322,129 4,334,995 1.01%


27

EDPRS SECTORS International RWF Local RWF Total RWF Total US$ % Total Investment

11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS

2,363,715,894 918,931,780 3,282,647,674 5,517,055 1.29%

12 HEALTH 70,439,647,863 5,338,665,215 75,778,313,078 127,358,509 29.74%

13 EDUCATION 23,298,020,504 30,431,604,118 53,729,624,622 90,301,890 21.08%

14 SOCIAL PROTECTION

40,418,860,424 17,753,212,976 58,172,073,400 97,768,191 22.83%

175,957,560,999 55,971,940,142 254,833,597,195 428,291,760 100%

Graph 1 - % of Total CSO investments by EDPRS Sector

As can be seen, the majority of the funds expended by CSOs in Rwanda are

overwhelmingly concentrated (88.99%) in the four sectors of health (29.74%%),

education (21.08%), social protection (22.83%) and agriculture (15.34%). While there

are definitional issues in respect of the allocation of activity expenditure to sectors, the

majority of those allocation issues related to multi-purpose expenditures (e.g.

education expenditure on health related matters) within these four sectors and

misallocation of expenditure is not a substantive issue. Table 3 below identifies the

relative expenditure of CSO funds through international and local NGOs.


28

Table 3 – Analysis of CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International and Local CSOs

EDPRS SECTORS

International CSO % of Sectoral Expenditure

Local CSO % of Sectoral Expenditure

DEFENSE 0.00% 0.00% PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY 69.11% 30.89% ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 50.92% 49.08% AGRICULTURE 84.54% 15.46% INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE 94.63% 5.37% FUEL AND ENERGY 27.35% 72.65% TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION 0.00% 0.00% LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 5.34% 94.66% WATER AND SANITATION 92.33% 7.67% YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 72.01% 27.99% HEALTH 92.95% 7.05% EDUCATION 43.36% 56.64% SOCIAL PROTECTION 69.48% 30.52%

Graph 2 - CSO Relative Expenditure by EDPRS Sector by International and Local CSOs

In EDPRS sectors 1, 2, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12 and 14, international CSOs expended the most

substantial portion of the funds expended in any sector, and overall, expended 75.9%


29

of all CSO expenditure in Rwanda. However, the figure of interest is the expenditure in

EDPRS Sector 13 – Education where local CSOs expended 56.64% of all of the funds

expended by CSOs in the education sector. There are other sectors where local CSOs

exceeded international CSO expenditure, but the importance of the figures for the

education sector lie in the volume of funds expended by that sector.

Most of the funds expended by CSOs (international and local) come from outside of

Rwanda and the education sector spends 21.44% of the total of all CSO expenditure in

Rwanda and the international funding sources for the education sector overwhelming

support local CSO expenditure of the majority of funds in that sector. The question

that naturally follows is why is this so in the education sector and not in the other

three large spending EDPRS sectors?

The benefit of the CSOs operating in the education sector in spending the majority of

the funds in that sector is clear –

Such an approach is very cost effective as the overhead costs of local CSOs are

lower than those on international CSOs (although this figure cannot be

quantified with exactitude without lengthy case studies);

The impact of capacity building of CSOs in the education sector is substantial;

It is reflective of a substantial degree of trust in the capacity of local CSOs in the

education sector.

However, this is not to say that the relative expenditures in the other sectors are

reflective of distrust of local capacity in those sectors, rather it is better to express it

that the level of comfort required for international funding sources to allow for

majority local expenditure of CSO funds in the other sectors has not yet been reached.

It is also important to note that this CSO mapping exercise is not an exercise in

determining the relative efficiencies of international versus local CSO expenditure in a

sector, as each sector and each sector specific approach calls for varying capacities and

levels of expertise which will determine the most efficient and effective means of

expenditure, and hence attainment of sector goals. This is best understood by an

example: if international funding sources were supporting the health sector to acquire


30

from the international market specific drugs for distribution within the government

Rwanda health care system, it is understandable that the majority of the funding

would go to an international CSO that had specific capacity in respect of the sourcing

of health supplies. While there may be Rwandan CSOs with experience in health supply

procurement, it is understandable that the funding might in first instance be lodged

with an international CSO with a greater depth of experience.

The recommendation is that this is an area that requires further specific examination

to determine the reasons for the disparity in international versus local CSO

expenditure in the major spending sectors (other than education) and what are the

benefits to be obtained for Rwanda and the impediments to be overcome to promote

a greater proportion of expenditure in these sectors being channeled through

Rwandan CSOs or other processes.

6.1 Relative CSO vs. Government Expenditure

Table 4 below shows the relative CSO versus Government of Rwanda expenditure for

the same FY 2009/2010.

Table 4 – Comparison of CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY 2009/2010

EDPRS SECTORS

CSO Expenditure

Frw

GoR Expenditure

CSO and GoR Total

Expenditure

CSO Expenditure

% Total

GoR Expenditure

% Total

01 GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE 11,799,337,787 234,316,719,873 246,116,057,660 5% 95%

02 DEFENSE 0 43,606,024,669 43,606,024,669 0% 100%

03 PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY 3,454,021,094 50,461,096,080 53,915,117,174 6% 94%

04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 3,671,532,178 12,727,367,386 16,398,899,564 22% 78%

05 AGRICULTURE 39,097,290,760 56,352,700,444 95,449,991,204 41% 59%

06 INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE 1,745,726,154 21,086,726,474 22,832,452,628 8% 92%

07 FUEL AND ENERGY 116,757,702 64,807,185,147 64,923,942,849 0% 100%

08 TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATION 0 105,107,821,377 105,107,821,377 0% 100%


31

EDPRS SECTORS

CSO Expenditure

Frw

GoR Expenditure

CSO and GoR Total

Expenditure

CSO Expenditure

% Total

GoR Expenditure

% Total

09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 1,406,950,617 4,954,883,991 6,361,834,608 22% 78%

10 WATER AND SANITATION 2,579,322,129 18,874,569,116 21,453,891,245 12% 88%

11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 3,282,647,674 6,547,504,677 9,830,152,351 33% 67%

12 HEALTH 75,778,313,078 86,272,474,883 162,050,787,961 47% 53%

13 EDUCATION 53,729,624,622 154,645,591,784 208,375,216,406 26% 74%

14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 58,172,073,400 39,201,817,580 97,373,890,980 60% 40%

Graph 3 - CSO and Government of Rwanda Sectoral Expenditure – FY 2009/2010

This material displays that in 7 of the 14 EDPRS sectors that the proportion of CSO

expenditure as a percentage of total sectoral expenditure exceeds 20% and in two of

the sectors, CSO expenditure is close to or exceeds 50% of total sectoral expenditure.

The EDPRS sectors where that the proportion of CSO expenditure as a percentage of

total sectoral expenditure exceeds 20% are contained in Table 5 below.


32

Table 5 –Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 Exceeds 20% Total National Expenditure

EDPRS Sector CSO Expenditure

% Total

04 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION 22%

05 AGRICULTURE 41%

09 LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES 22%

11 YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS 33%

12 HEALTH 46%

13 EDUCATION 24%

14 SOCIAL PROTECTION 60%

Table 5 clearly indicates the need for central government interaction with CSOs in

respect of the prioritization of sectoral expenditure within sectors as the level of CSO

expenditure in these sectors is a substantial proportion of the total sectoral

expenditure. This level of interaction is not evident today. Further, Table 5 also clearly

demonstrates the importance of CSOs in Rwanda in terms of overall service delivery

within the key EDPRS sectors. Given that CSOs in Rwanda have this level of

expenditure in terms of overall national expenditure in the key EDPRS sectoral areas, it

is recommended that the government give close and further consideration to the

formalization of interaction with CSOs on a continuing basis in order that key sectoral

investments are effectively addressed.

6.2 Relative CSO by District

As is seen in Table 6 Relative Total CSO Expenditure by District below, there is a great

disparity in overall CSO expenditure by district. Gasabo (11.56%), Bugesera (11.51%)

and Kayonza (10.18%) have attracted CSO expenditure across all sectors at rates that

exceed what could normally be expected and between the three districts account for

33.25% of all CSO expenditure across all districts.

A statistical average per district would normally have been expected to be of the order

of 3.33% per district of total expenditure, or 9.99% total for the three districts, but this

has been exceeded by over 300%. The impacts of this disparity are obvious, in that the

larger expenditure in these three districts is at the potential expense of other districts.

This is not to imply that these three districts received more funding than should have


33

been allocated on a needs basis or that funds were not well applied within those three

districts, because the authors are unaware of the details of all of the respective

sectoral strategies considered by all of the CSOs in making their allocations to differing

districts.

However, it does appear to be a statistical anomaly that that there is such a large

disparity for these districts. The recommendation for consideration is that on a

sectoral basis, when making district allocations for programmes, that CSOs be advised

to follow the relevant sector strategic plans which have identified relative district

needs. While this may even out funding approaches in the future, this is not certain as

it may well be that the combined effect of all of the sector strategic plans is to result in

heightened allocations to these three districts.

It is also important to note that the high expenditures in Kigali city could be as a result

of poor documentation where by some donors remit funds to the head office at

Gasabo in Kigali city where these NGOs are headquartered and yet these funds are

actually utilised in other districts where they are implementing projects. This may also

result into double counting.


34

Table 6 – Relative Total Sectoral CSO Expenditure FY 2009/2010 per District


03 PUBLIC ORDER AND

SAFETY

04 ENVIRONMENT

AL PROTECTION 05 AGRICULTURE

06 INDUSTRY AND

COMMERCE

07 FUEL AND

ENERGY

09 LAND HOUSING &

COMMUNITY AMENITIES


11 YOUTH CULTURE AND

SPORTS 12 HEALTH 13 EDUCATION 14 SOCIAL

PROTECTION TOTAL % 0f Total

Kicukiro 356,021,007 364,143,252 684,201,648 286,123,892 2,442,895 86,293,740 55,133,680 606,463,955 3,584,153,633 2,529,108,167 1,572,056,263 10,126,142,131 4.21%

Nyarugenge 313,622,659 346,657,032 114,627,048 145,956,023 2,442,895 140,293,740 9,515,625 608,113,205 5,652,002,699 725,825,982 1,542,366,909 9,601,423,815 4.00%

Gasabo 904,678,170 298,028,032 275,160,381 290,233,697 2,442,895 70,293,740 9,515,625 1,176,925,955 4,500,423,561 5,762,097,634 14,484,979,384 27,774,779,074 11.56%

Bugesera 374,808,429 77,539,344 27,251,500 3,321,943,135 2,442,895 10,833,333 142,514,046 139,515,625 41,028,767 5,330,039,030 12,713,076,649 5,478,258,952 27,659,251,705 11.51%

Rwamagana 329,701,896 93,209,915 13,451,500 1,207,880,670 2,442,895 13,996,597 19,655,767 2,117,993,297 454,143,492 1,515,639,180 5,768,115,208 2.40%

Kayonza 242,251,271 85,342,425 11,834,267 1,112,772,051 3,322,895 83,371,597 19,000,000 16,871,767 4,787,960,315 15,972,948,479 2,129,003,651 24,464,678,717 10.18%

Gatsibo 317,903,329 126,718,074 2,179,667 1,159,748,640 2,442,895 10,293,740 342,265,487 157,371,767 2,047,102,060 476,004,449 3,136,571,540 7,778,601,648 3.24%

Nyagatare 239,979,414 103,481,854 2,179,667 3,279,984,555 2,442,895 212,493,740 19,655,767 2,175,500,251 959,497,890 1,365,904,472 8,361,120,503 3.48%

Kirehe 327,150,375 69,671,854 9,468,417 1,333,833,253 5,702,261 10,293,740 17,371,767 3,363,312,195 308,803,805 852,819,371 6,298,427,038 2.62%

Ngoma 302,106,421 70,671,854 9,468,417 381,519,704 2,442,895 10,293,740 323,265,487 17,371,767 3,712,426,756 263,880,699 1,454,464,570 6,547,912,309 2.73%

Kamonyi 337,344,753 78,295,915 13,118,167 1,459,013,030 2,442,895 10,833,333 83,371,597 13,871,767 4,607,471,003 346,369,939 2,493,537,358 9,445,669,757 3.93%

Muhanga 325,546,187 101,644,125 2,179,667 362,556,057 2,442,895 52,326,432 76,841,903 146,497,806 163,819,303 1,529,812,350 487,459,860 2,066,810,396 5,317,936,978 2.21%

Ruhango 304,776,692 70,428,425 13,118,167 1,309,592,142 5,702,261 13,996,597 13,871,767 1,723,040,347 1,083,832,229 2,873,800,630 7,412,159,256 3.08%

Nyanza 324,279,375 69,671,854 2,179,667 1,304,857,258 2,442,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,659,895,678 327,716,305 1,217,435,446 4,932,643,985 2.05%

Huye 362,318,214 78,295,915 368,099,667 5,503,559,126 5,702,261 13,996,597 13,871,767 1,196,458,107 704,329,455 1,578,808,933 9,825,440,042 4.09%

Gisagara 302,606,421 77,539,344 2,179,667 1,176,709,705 2,442,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,144,879,836 257,506,205 1,544,037,334 4,532,066,913 1.89%

Nyamagabe 1,159,233,130 69,671,854 165,969,815 457,702,901 94,550,037 10,293,740 16,655,767 1,794,200,423 266,379,777 1,293,194,918 5,327,852,362 2.22%

Gakenke 304,776,692 77,539,344 2,179,667 1,108,463,906 2,442,895 10,293,740 19,496,767 1,881,034,381 319,861,720 738,899,474 4,464,988,583 1.86%

Rutsiro 346,148,454 69,671,854 17,317,668 344,274,080 134,602,895 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,545,677,279 280,767,882 528,155,788 3,290,781,405 1.37%

Nyamasheke 309,749,278 69,671,854 7,067,672 242,115,309 94,550,037 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,455,020,153 386,306,305 1,101,574,282 3,690,220,397 1.54%

Rubavu 336,232,166 69,671,854 53,617,668 350,504,358 2,442,895 10,293,740 96,097,579 1,821,483,746 366,335,757 890,690,022 3,997,369,783 1.66%

Nyabihu 304,776,692 70,428,425 222,334,667 1,363,179,571 126,232,028 76,841,903 16,655,767 1,507,817,055 1,568,860,955 718,340,495 5,975,467,557 2.49%

Ngororero 304,776,692 69,671,854 197,381,810 298,930,820 2,442,895 73,139,046 52,067,200 13,871,767 1,601,960,654 246,716,305 514,161,727 3,375,120,768 1.40%

Rusizi 332,379,499 69,671,854 7,067,672 1,350,510,307 97,809,403 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,331,259,462 598,937,366 1,230,890,730 5,042,691,799 2.10%

Burera 244,745,225 69,671,854 102,179,667 1,126,838,187 126,232,028 10,293,740 30,562,523 2,821,815,855 313,597,543 796,914,972 5,642,851,593 2.35%


35


03 PUBLIC ORDER AND

SAFETY

04 ENVIRONMENT

AL PROTECTION 05 AGRICULTURE

06 INDUSTRY AND

COMMERCE

07 FUEL AND

ENERGY

09 LAND HOUSING &

COMMUNITY AMENITIES


11 YOUTH CULTURE AND

SPORTS 12 HEALTH 13 EDUCATION 14 SOCIAL

PROTECTION TOTAL % 0f Total

Gicumbi 337,792,892 69,671,854 173,717,668 219,418,586 2,442,895 10,833,333 10,293,740 323,265,487 19,496,767 1,505,850,114 278,609,964 1,812,317,169 4,763,710,469 1.98%

Musanze 249,615,496 69,671,854 17,317,668 1,373,359,823 817,431,395 79,668,740 107,645,431 35,346,523 1,794,856,263 335,696,037 1,116,372,880 5,996,982,108 2.50%

Rulindo 316,051,692 70,046,854 291,229,900 338,915,669 2,442,895 10,293,740 45,618,055 19,496,767 1,500,320,644 306,714,132 939,330,473 3,840,460,821 1.60%

Nyaruguru 1,126,146,542 69,671,854 505,637,905 222,338,668 94,550,037 10,293,740 13,871,767 1,758,522,902 418,524,597 840,704,323 5,060,262,335 2.11%

Karongi 257,258,353 69,671,854 165,969,815 270,448,892 97,809,403 10,293,740 35,700,000 13,871,767 1,533,457,272 248,080,382 1,252,368,081 3,954,929,559 1.65%

Totals 11,594,777,415 3,095,744,224 3,479,686,773 32,703,284,014 1,745,726,154 84,826,432 1,331,813,422 1,609,005,509 3,251,047,674 72,985,747,318 49,307,989,962 59,080,409,722 240,270,058,619 100%

Graph 4 – Relative Sectoral Expenditure CSOs FY 2009/2010 per District


36

Also note that District expenditures were generated by dividing total expenditure by

the number of districts. This means expenditures per district were not available but

global expenditure comprising of districts where a portion of the funds was spent.

7.0 EDPRS 1 – GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE

The data for EDPRS 1 is contained in Annex 3. Total expenditure in EDPRS 1 is 4.83% of

the total CSO annual expenditure and is one of the lesser relative areas of expenditure,

but is still substantial in overall terms at RWF 11.6 billion (US$19.5 million)

The majority of the activities are focused on good governance and the detail of the

activities and the budgets appear in Annex 3. In terms of overall district expenditure,

the mean expenditure would normally be expected at 3.33% per district, but as can be

seen from the below, the districts of Gasabo, Nyamagabe and Nyaruguru all have a

disproportionately level of expenditure compared to other districts. This will assume a

greater importance at a later time when the overall district analysis is considered.

Graph 5 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 1 – General Public Service

8.0 EDPRS 2 – DEFENSE

No CSO expended funds in this sector.


37

9.0 EDPRS 3 – PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 3 are contained in Annex 4. This sector is

interesting because it represents only 1.29% of total CSO expenditure but is the sector

within which justice, law and order resides and it might have been thought appropriate

that CSOs would spend more on this sector given the history of genocide. The answer

appears to lay in the assumption that all matters related to the genocide are matters

to be solidly lead by government. In terms of overall district expenditure, the mean

expenditure would normally be expected at 3.33% per district, but as can be seen from

the below, the districts of Gasabo, Kicukiro and Nyarugenge all have a

disproportionately level of expenditure compared to other districts. This will assume a

greater importance at a later time when the overall district analysis is considered.

Graph 6 – CSO Expenditure EDPRS 3 – Public Order and Safety

10.0 EDPRS 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 4 are contained in Annex 5. This sector

represents only 1.45% of total CSO expenditure and while the activities of

environmental protection are of relevance and interest nationwide, the district focus

of these activities demonstrates a pattern where the activities are focused in a very

small number of districts. Kicukiro and Huye absorb almost 30% of all CSO

environment funds and many districts have effectively no expenditure at all.


38

Graph 7– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 4 – Environmental Protection

11.0 EDPRS 5 – AGRICULTURE

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 5 are contained in Annex 6. Overall spending

on EDPRS 5 – Agriculture is the 4th largest individual area of CSO expenditure - of the

order of RWF32.7 billion (US$54.9 million) being 13.61% of the total expenditure.

Given the overall percentage of Rwandans engaged in agricultural activity, this level of

expenditure is to be expected. However, what is not to be expected is that 3 Districts,

Huye (16.83%), Nyagatare and Bugesera (10% each) consume almost 47% of all of the

agricultural resources expended by CSOs in the agricultural sector. This proportion is

greatly in excess of any possible allocation supported by a needs based allocation and

is a glaring example of the inefficiencies of CSO intra-sectoral funds allocation. While it

cannot be doubted that every district, including Huye, Nyagatare and Bugesera, are in

need of fiscal support in the agricultural sector, it is doubted if this disproportionate

weighting in favour of three districts is in fact warranted.

Graph 8– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 5 - Agriculture


39

12.0 EDPRS 6 – INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 6 are contained in Annex 7. Industry and

commerce is not a standard area for CSO investment and activity, but EDPRS includes

tourism and within tourism is counted the expenditure by CSOs in respect of gorilla

tourism. Not surprisingly, Musanze District accounts for almost 47% of the CSO

expenditure in this sector as this is where the greatest concentration of gorillas is

located. In this case, all of the funds expended are expended by international CSOs in

respect of gorilla tourism.

Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 6 – Industry and Commerce

13.0 EDPRS 7 – FUEL AND ENERGY

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 7 are contained in Annex 8. Apart from the

two sectors already identified where CSOs invested no funds, EDPRS 7 – Fuel and

Energy is the sector where CSOs in fact expend the least funds, at RWF 84.8 million.

Graph 9– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 7 – Fuel and Energy


40

14.0 EDPRS 8 – FUEL AND ENERGY

No funds were expended by CSOs in this sector

15.0 EDPRS 9 – LAND HOUSING & COMMUNITY AMENITIES

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 9 are contained in Annex 10. This is an area

the majority of spending was contained within 11 districts but as this represents 0.55%

of all CSO expenditure, it is not an area of significance.

Graph 10– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 9 – land Housing & Community Amenities

16.0 EDPRS 10 – WATER AND SANITATION

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 10 are contained in Annex 11. The level of

expenditure is 0.63% of total, but this may disguise the overall level of investment in

the water sector as investments of water for agriculture were classified as agriculture

sector investments. The contents of this EDPRS analysis therefore relate to water and

sanitation in towns and major trading centers and these are usually the realm of

central government.

Graph 11– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 10 – Water & Sanitation


41

17.0 EDPRS 11 – YOUTH CULTURE & SPORTS

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 11 are contained in Annex 12. Approximately

1.35% of total CSO expenditure was focused in this area and so it is to be considered

minor. While it does appear from the Annex and the graph below that the three Kigali

districts received almost all of the funding in this sector and that this should be

considered anomalous, the limited number of CSOs active in this sector can cause a

perception distortion.

Graph 12– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 11 – Youth Culture & Sports

18.0 EDPRS 12 – EDUCATION

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 12 are contained in Annex 13. Education is

one of the largest areas of CSO investments and the analysis of the figures shows that

30.38% of all expenditure is focused in this area. The analysis shows that 9 districts are

receiving disproportionately high levels of investment compared to other districts. The

statistical average, assuming equality of districts, is 3.33% of all expenditure by district,

but Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Bugesera, Kayonza, Kirehe, Ngoma and Kamonyi

have CSO levels of expenditure that do not accord to this pattern.

This level of disproportionate expenditure is hard to explain, especially when it is

remembered that CSOs that declared that their activities covered all districts or a

specified number of districts resulted in the proportional allocation of expenditure to

all districts. This can have a distorting effect on the level of expenditure in the districts

which are not specifically named and increase their apparent allocations. The

implication being that the lesser funded districts may well in fact not have received

that level of funding at all, making the disproportionate allocations even more

substantial.


42

It must also be remembered that the overall level of expenditure for the sector may be

inflated by the classification process used to assign expenditure, in that if a CSO

expended funds for water in schools, this was classified as a school (education)

expenditure.

The importance of the data is that given the very high levels of relative expenditure in

a limited number of districts, attention must be focused on the potential for the

promotion among CSOs of a relativity of allocations so as not to create aid ‘orphans’

amongst districts. The education sector strategic investment plan and other education

sector planning documents do not support this disparity of investment between

districts and it must be viewed as a matter of concern by central government as to the

reasoning that lead to this allocation spread. Again, as in other sectors, it is not to be

perceived that the districts with a higher proportional investment by CSOs did not in

fact need and benefit from that level of investment, but the pattern does raise

questions of the appropriateness of overall sectoral attention.

Graph 13– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 12 - Education

19.0 EDPRS 13 – HEALTH

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 13 are contained in Annex 14. The analysis of

the CSO investments in this sector is of major interest as 20.52% of all expenditure is

focused in the sector, with over 50% of all expenditure being focused in two districts,


43

Bugesera and Kayonza, with another 15% expended in Kicukiro and Gasabo, meaning

that almost the entire sector expenditure is focused in four districts at the expense of

the other districts.

There can be a number of reasons for this substantial disparity between districts. The

first area is that health investments are usually expensive and a major investment (for

instance, a hospital) can distort the overall figures. Another area of potential

distortion is that CSOs can have declared that multi-year investments are in fact spread

over several years, but given this overall level of disparity, it would not substantially

impact the disparities.

The disparities are made even more glaring because some of the major CSO

investments in the sector were spread over all districts as a matter of allocation. For

instance, a CSO was engaged in a multi-million dollar invest that related to the supply

of medical supplies which was spread over all districts. This means that the overall

health sector expenditure by CSOs is even more heavily waited to the districts which

benefitted the most from CSO expenditure.

The impact of this overall spread of CSO investments means that ‘aid orphans’ are

clearly created in the majority of districts. The concern for central government will be

the need to consider this great disparity in terms of overall central allocations in the

future. This is only possible if the central government has accurate figures of annual

expenditure and this can only be achieved if the recommendation sin respect of CSO

registration is implemented.

Graph 14– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 13 - Health


44

20.0 EDPRS 14 – SOCIAL PROTECTION

The activities and the budgets for EDPRS 14 are contained in Annex 15. This sector was

one of the major areas of expenditure by CSOs and represents 24.59% of all CSO

expenditure, but as is noted in the graph, almost all of the expenditure was focused in

Gasabo and Bugesera. While Gasabo has a substantial population and there is without

doubt a need for expenditure in this sector in that district, it is not possible to explain

the overwhelming level of investment proportionately that has favoured that district in

this sector. Classification does not appear to be a substantial issue in terms of

allocations of expenditure and this is an area for further investigation by central

government.

Graph 15– CSO Expenditure EDPRS 14 – Social Protection

21.0 CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS

A series of challenges were noted that hindering the smooth running of the overall

administration of CSOs in Rwanda. They are –

(a) Poor reporting mechanisms and schedules where by periodical reports are

supposed to be submitted to the JADF and MINALOC/IMMIGRATION but are actually

not submitted. This causes a supervision bottlenecks and poor coordination of their

activities.


45

(b) There is a facilitation problem both in terms of transport and communication. This

makes it difficult for the JADF PS to effectively monitor and coordinate the activities of

all CSOs operating in districts where they are in charge.

(c) There is an issue of the JADFs feeling unempowered and lacking authority in the

execution of their work. This results in them not considering that they are able to even

bring the CSO heads together in times of need in order to streamline the operations of

CSOs.

(d) There is no clear communication mechanism between MINALOC and district JADFs

and this leads to a situation where CSOs are registered at MINALOC but are not known

at the district where they operate.

(e) There is also no clear monitoring and evaluation mechanism of the CSO activities

from MINALOC down to the district level and Umurenge level. There is no frame work

within which the activities of these CSOs can be monitored.

(f) There is also challenge of the legal framework in respect of CSO registration and

operation. This has been dealt with elsewhere.

(g) For local CSOs, there is no steady stream of income and this makes their employees

work as volunteers.

The recommendations are-

1. That the CSO registration process be changed so that it undertaken through the

Development Assistance Database so that all CSO information is captured annually as

part of the annual registration process. This will annually update all data relating to

activates and areas of focus and will be a valuable tool for all stakeholders when

determining their selection of sectoral investments.

2. That the implementation laws necessary to implement the CSO organic law be

drafted and passed as soon as reasonably practicable.


46

3. Further investigations be undertaken to determine the value for money in terms of

sectoral investments by CSOs against the respective level of central government.

4. Increase/deepen CSO involvement in the Sector Working Groups (SWGs).

5. JADFs do not feel empowered, they are weak by perception and therefore they

should be strengthened in order for them to effectively execute their duties. An

example here is the feeling of being powerless to ask for periodical reports. This is an

issue that was raised by the JADFs.

6. Improve on facilitation of the JADFs to improve coordination, monitoring and

evaluation. This is interms of transport and communication.

22.0 CONCLUSIONS

This CSO mapping exercise has not been definitive as it was not a census. There are

CSOs that have not been captured and there may well be classification issues in

respect of overall expenditure. However, it is clear that the recommendations in

respect of the gathering of accurate annual data in respect of CSOs must be a priority

matter for central government given the overall level of expenditure by CSOs in some

of the priority sectors.

The completion of this CSO mapping exercise has provided for the very first time

extensive data on the operations of CSOs in Rwanda, but not to the degree of detail

that may be wanted by some stakeholders. This can only be achieved by an actual

census, which is both time consuming and expensive. It is much more relevant to

Rwanda to have an annual picture of overall CSO expenditure that is complete and

accurate In order that central government can both engage CSOs in dialogue over

activities and areas of focus, but also to consider its own allocations, which must be

based on solid and robust data.

The importance of this exercise for CSOs themselves in Rwanda is that the data

provided by this CSO mapping exercise demonstrates very clearly the importance of

civil society in service delivery in vital sectors within Rwanda and CSOs are to be seen

as major stakeholders in the overall development agenda. CSOs will be able to use this


47

data to further their discussions and interactions with development partners and

central government in terms of enhancing the focus and relevance of their activities.

Further work is required in respect of the value for money that CSOs bring to the

development agenda in Rwanda. The scope of this mapping exercise demonstrates the

importance of CSOs, but not whether they represent value for money in terms of their

activities. This can only be done by a sectoral approach which compares the activities

of central and local governments to comparable CSO activities in the each sector. This

mapping exercise offers no comment on this aspect because it was a matter that was

well outside the scope of the exercise, but this is an area that requires substantial

further consideration and is one that should be undertaken jointly by CSOs and

government to determine those areas of activity where there are advantages for

activities to be undertaken by the stakeholders.


48

ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE

Objective The overall objective of this assignment is to contribute to the following:

a. Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda through aggregating the Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) activities;

b. Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;

c. Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through assessing the gaps that currently exist;

d. Informing better the Government and Platform planning process by quantifying the CSO contribution in the national estimates;

e. Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates; f. Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby and advocacy; g. To assess where CSO have a comparative advantage so that in its complementary role with the

government, the latter comes in where there is a gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different sectors by different stakeholders.

Background The Rwandan Civil Society has been in existence from 1956 when its first segments were established in form of farmers associations who were answerable to the church. It grew to sizable proportions when several associations, Community Based Organizations (CSOs), Non-Government Organizations (NGOs), formed umbrellas that brought together NGOs and CSOs with common interest. This organizational set up left CSO deprived of the capacity to coordinate and engage with different partners .This gap made the CSO not only perceived as weak but also vulnerable. Motivated by a desire to combine their efforts to contribute to the integral development of the country and promotion of the rule of law, 8 umbrellas , CCOAIB, CESTRAR, CLADHO, IBUKA, the Union IMBARAGA, CEJP, THE PRESS HOUSE and PRO-FEMMES TWESE HAMWE initiated the idea of setting up a platform that would enable them to achieve their mission. Thereafter, seven other umbrellas and organization networks became members. This was realized at the Constituent Assembly held on July 9, 2004 when CS members came together and formed the Rwanda Civil Society Platform-RCSP that brings together all actors of the civil society. It was created as a framework for exchange and dialogue between member organizations and between the latter and their partners. Mission and Objectives of RCSP The Platform's mission is to serve as a framework for dialogue, reflection on common issues, information exchange, mutual support and reinforcement and build a valid interlocutor to various partners of the civil society. The objectives of the Platform are;

Promote solidarity and harmonize relations between civil society organizations;

Analyze the context and challenges the population of Rwanda has faced and /or is facing with a view to adopt common position and strategy for specific actions;

Establish and maintain an information and communication system to enable the civil society to achieve its mission in close collaboration with all partners;

Develop an effective partnership at national, regional and international levels;

Perform the representation and advocacy mandate of the Civil Society. Despite the establishment of the Platform, organizations and umbrella activities remained individualized and isolated and their location, nature and, quantities remained unknown. This made the civil society overall contribution to national development shrouded in mystery and hence the doubt of the usefulness of the CSO as development partners. It is against this background a survey is to be undertaken in order to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their quantities. This study arises out of the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of the civil society in national


49

economic development and poverty reduction. This will not only help the Platform but also the government and Development Partners by providing useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by the Civil Society Organizations. This will include activities undertaken by national NGOs and those INGOs that implement activities on the grassroots. Scope of Work The selected firm or team of consultants will work under the direct supervision of the Rwanda Civil Society Platform and will work in close collaboration with the Aid Coordination Unit (ACU) of the United Nations in Rwanda Specifically, they will perform, but limited to:

Map out activities of the civil society organizations in all the districts of Rwanda, domain of intervention and come up with the pattern of their distribution;

Gather flow of CSO funding information for both LNGOs and INGSOs (disbursement information) and activities from relevant Government and district entities (i.e. MINALOC, Directorate General of Immigration and Emigration) and from CSO organizations;

Assess activities and source of their funding;

Meet members of the civil society district by district to discuss their programs, funding opportunities available, challenges, best practices and way forward;


Work out details of the employment statistics within individual organizations constituting the Civil Society;

Gather qualitative information on the activities of organizations working in governance, Advocacy and human rights;

Help Organize and moderate a user workshop to present and discuss the draft report at a national workshop of members and stakeholders and to validate the draft report.

Methodology: A participatory approach will be used involving different stake holders. The following can be recommended:

Use of Structured questionnaires;

Interviews;

Use of organization reports and work plans

Use of available secondary data at the district and in ministries (particularly the data submitted to the Ministry of Local Administration and Social Affairs (MINALOC) and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MINAFEET) upon the CSO registration process;

Meeting with government officials, donors, CSO leadership at organization level, the private media, Faith based organizations, CSOs, Trade unions;

Field visits Reporting and working languages: The consultation will be carried out in English and the finalized report submitted in the same language; Kinyarwanda should be the field language for the structured questionnaires Outputs and Deliverables The following outputs are as expected from the consultancy:

CSO contribution in economic development and poverty reduction is known, coordinated and organized which will inform the CS effective engagement in public policy dialogue and advocacy;

CSO activities are coordinated and there is no duplication and overlap thereof;

Areas/sectors where CS has strengths are known and exploited and where weaknesses are identified are strengthened to help in future planning process;

Donor funding by sector easily identified. Specific Deliverables:

An inception report showing the consultant’s proposed approach and methodology for the


50

execution of the consultancy. The methodology will provide details of persons to be interviewed, methods and tools for interview and a calendar for the service;

Prepare a study draft report;

Moderation of a workshop to present and discuss the report; and

Prepare the final report Qualifications The candidates must demonstrate the following qualifications and experience:

A strong company profile and a team of consultants with a minimum of Masters Degree of education in Social Sciences, Public Policy Analysis, Economics, and Public Administration;

Have at least ten (10) years progressive experience work in areas of strategic thinking, strategy development, organizational capacity analysis and development;

Be familiar with the theory of change influencing processes;

Have proven experience in the use of participatory qualitative and quantitative assessment/analytic methodologies such as outcome mapping, adult learning and organizational capacity assessment;

Have knowledge/ expertise of business development and resource planning and to have done this as well for not-for profit organizations;

Have a wide experience in rights based programming, democratic governance and NGO development work;

Have good skills in public policy analysis and good knowledge of the Rwanda Governance context.

Key Competencies

Good understanding of the Civil Society Organizations;

In-depth substantive knowledge of the political environment and challenges facing the Civil Society Organizations in Africa;

Ability to transfer knowledge and skills to colleagues and partners;

Strong written and oral communication skills;

Strong interpersonal skills demonstrated by the ability to gain the assistance and cooperation of others in a team endeavour;

ability to build trust through operating with transparency and creating and open, positive and enabling environment;

ability to work in a multi-cultural environment with sensitivity and respect for diversity;

Demonstrated ability to establish priorities and to plan, coordinate and monitor tasks to achieve results;

Sound judgement and decision making skills;

Demonstrated ability to establish priorities and to plan, coordinate and monitor tasks to achieve result.

Remuneration and Other Considerations The successful firm (Team of consultants) will start his/her assignment as soon as possible following the completion of the recruitment process. Submissions will be accepted from Firms or Teams of Consultants only The Successful Result of this Process will be a Contract for services. Defining an initial period of Three (3) months worked. Terms of Payment for this consultancy will be a daily lump sum based on International Consultancy scale payable as follows: a) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of an inception report showing the consultant’s proposed approach and methodology for the execution of the consultancy. The methodology will provide details of persons to be interviewed, methods and tools for interview and a calendar for the service; b) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of the study draft report;


51

c) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon completion of moderation of a workshop to present and discuss the report; d) 25 % of the total contract amount to be paid upon submission and acceptance of the final consultancy report.


52

ANNEX 2 INTERVIEW QUESTIONNAIRE

Background The purpose of this study is to map out civil society activities, areas of intervention, and their quantities to assess and consider the prevailing concern of the relevance and role of the civil society in national economic development and poverty reduction. This will not only help the Platform but also the government and Development Partners by providing useful overview of the support and activities undertaken by CSOs. This will include activities undertaken by national NGOs and those INGOs that implement activities at the grassroots. The CSO mapping study focuses on the following issues:

Increased understanding of the impacts of the civil society activities in Rwanda through aggregating the Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) activities;

Harmonized distribution of activities by the CSOs and coordinated activities and programmes through mapping out the activities sector by sector;

Informed future planning processes of the CSOs and required funding through assessing the gaps currently exist Informing better the Government and Platform planning process by quantifying the CSO contribution in the national estimates

Quantify the CSO contribution in the national estimates.

Use the information generated from the study to form the basis of the lobby and advocacy.

To assess where CSOs have a comparative advantage so that in its complementary role with the government, the latter comes in where there is a gap to fill. This complementary role will enhance specialization in different sectors by different stakeholders.

We are therefore keen to understand the activities of the CSO in Rwanda and their contribution to the general development agenda, as well as to understand how effectively they have currently aligned they activities with the national development goals of for example the EDPRS.

CSO MAPPING QUESTIONNAIRE

Organisation Name:

Organisation Incorporation and Registration Details:

Registered with MINALOC

Registered with Immigration Department

Incorporation Date

Incorporation Place

Charter/Memorandum of Association

Organisation Contact Details:

Address

Office Phone

Office fax

URL

Email Contact Addresses

Umbrella Organisation Membership

FY

Districts of Operation:

Membership Details:

Primary respondent:

Name

Title

Address

Cell Phone

Email Contact

Sector (Use GoR sectoral classifications)


53


Area (s) of specialisation/sector:

Strategic Plans/Vision Statements (Tick if provided)

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2009-2010

Annual Work plan Checklist (Tick if provided)

AWP FY 2008

AWP FY 2009

AWP FY 2009-2010

Annual Budget Checklist (Tick if provided)

Budget FY 2008

Budget FY 2009

Budget FY 2009-2010

Quarterly Progress Report Checklist (Tick if provided)

QPRs FY 2008

QPRs FY 2009

QPRs FY 2009-2010

Quarterly Financial Report Checklist (Tick if provided)

QFRs FY 2008

QFRs FY 2009

QFRs FY 2009-2010

Annual Report Checklist (Tick if provided)

Annual Report FY 2008

Annual Report FY 2009

Annual Report FY 2009-2010

Audit Report Checklist (Tick if provided)

Audit Report FY 2008

Audit Report FY 2009

Audit Report FY 2009-2010

Reports to GoR (MINALOC, Immigration etc) (Tick if provided)

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2009-2010

Major source of Funding:

FY 2008

FY 2009

FY 2009-2010

Staffing Establishment Year – 2008

No Total Wage Bill inc allowances

Management

Programmatic

Technical

Secretarial

Ancillary

Year – 2009


Management

Programmatic

Technical

Secretarial

Ancillary

Year – 2010


Management


54


Programmatic

Technical

Secretarial

Ancillary

Additional Questions

1. Who is your major source of funding and what is the size of your budget for past year (FY)?

2. How would you describe the current activities and other development objectives in the last 12 Months (FY)? Do you have strategic plans or implementation/execution reports?

3. In what ways, and to what extent, is the results framework for the EDPRS an improvement over previous approaches to your activities in Rwanda?

4. Is there evidence that the development of the results framework of the EDPRS have improved your performance, or influenced policy and expenditure decisions?

5. How were the activities designed?

6. What are the main strengths and weaknesses of the EDPRS as opposed to CSO activities’ implementation? How would you rate your contribution to the National development?


55

ANNEX 3 EDPRS 1 – GENERAL PUBLIC SERVICE

Name International or Local

Registered (Y/N)

Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless otherwise

stated

Budget RWf

THE URBAN INSTITUTE

International Y Local Government and civic participation strengthening

All districts of Rwanda $3,554,070 2,114,671,650

NATIONAL DEMOCRATIC INSTITUTE(NDI)

International Y Political Parties and Governance All districts of Rwanda $500,000 297,500,000

SOCIAL & SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS Inc.

International Y M&E of NGOs funded by USAID All districts of Rwanda $1,361,830 810,288,850

NORWEGIAN PEOPLE'S AID

International Y CSO capacity development and democratic Governance

All districts of Rwanda 2,122,061,532 2,122,061,532

SNV RWANDA International Y Facilitating JADF activities Gasabo, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Ngoma, Kirehe, Ngororero, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusuzi, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Rulindo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyaruguru & Ruhango

€1,737,000 1,422,603,000

SEARCH FOR COMMON GROUND

International Y Conflict resolution All districts $321,288 192.772,800

CENTRE CANADIEN D'TUDE ET DE COOPERATION INTERNATIONALE (CECI)

International Y Good governance and economic development

Nyamagabe & Nyaruguru districts

$3,000,000 1,785,000,000

Trocaire International Y Governance and Human Rights All districts country wide

Euros 531,298 435,133,062


56


Registered (Y/N)


stated

Budget RWf

INTERNEWS EUROPE International Y Media(train communications staffs & spokespersons from ministries, police, government agencies in Media relations,..) and Health

Gasabo Euros 350,000 208,250,000

CARE International Rwanda

International Y PPIMA project Nyaruguru £ 100,000 97,300,000

Y Total International RWF

9,292,808,094

Transparency Rwanda

Local Y Governance (Conduct studies, surveys and procurement of sensitization materials for ant corruption crusades

All districts country wide

346,716,855 346,716,855

Centre for Communication on Peace and Cohesion in Rwanda

Local Y Admin &Operation Kigali city 29,475,000 29,475,000

Rwanda Link Local Y Peace and Reconciliation Kigali city, Gicumbi 7,600,000 7,600,000

Rwanda Link Local Y Salaries Kigali City and Gicumbi Province

1,380,000 1,380,000

MULINDI JAPAN ONE LOVE

Local Y Admin &Operation Kigali city 187,700 111,681,500

REACH ORGANISATION IN RWANDA

Local Y Good Governance (unity & Reconciliation) youth seminar, released prisoners and survivors, supporting unity Groups, construction of Kayonza centre for peace

Kayonza, Kirehe, Rulindo

45,100,000 45,100,000

REACH Local Y Administrative Expenses Gasabo district 16,800,000 16,800,000


57


Registered (Y/N)


stated

Budget RWf

ORGANISATION IN RWANDA

Centre Professionnel d'Appui à la Bonne Gouvernance

Local Y Good Governance (research on Good Governance and community development, module production, capacity building

Bugesera, Gasabo 190,000,000 190,000,000

Never Again-Rwanda

Local Y Good governance (encouraging Youth in Democratic Process

Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyagatare

45,394 27,009,430

Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)

Local Y Unity and Reconciliation Gasabo 1,900,000 1,900,000

GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)

Local Y Governance (unity and reconciliation in secondary schools, human rights sensitisation and democracy in Great Lakes region, Staff Training

Nyaruguru, Gasabo 41,760 24,847,200

BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP

Local Y Governance (unity and reconciliation, Trauma hearing), Capacity Building

Kicukiro 10,670,000 10,670,000

Collectif des ligues et Associations de defense des Droits de l'hommes au Rwanda (CLADHO)

Local Y Governance: Budget Process Training to MPs and Local leaders, Human rights training

All and special for Rwamagana, Bugesera, Nyarugenge, Kamonyi and Huye

642,939,163 642,939,163

Youth League for Peace and Conflict Resolution in Great Lakes Region (LPGL)

Local Y Capacity Building: Unity and Reconciliation, Public and Private, HIV/AIDS Control

Gasabo, Huye, Musanze, Rubavu, Nyarugenge, Karongi, Bugesera

15,400,000 15,400,000

JYA MU BANDI Local Y Capacity Building Gasabo 3,200,000 3,200,000


58


Registered (Y/N)


stated

Budget RWf

MWANA

Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Ministries

Local Y Capacity Building All 54,000 32,130,000

Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Capacity Building Gicumbi, Rusizi, Nyamagabe, Rutsiro, Kigali Ville, Huye

159,679,605 159,679,605

Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)

Local Y General: administrative Gasabo 358,018,768 358,018,768

African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)

Local Y Governance: Unity and reconciliation mainstreaming in schools and Churches

Bugesera, Muhanga, Huye, Nyamagabe, Rubavu, Gatsibo

78,759,827 78,759,827

AS WE FORGIVE Local Y Unity and Reconciliation (thru Radio Programs, development projects)

Gasabo, Bugesera, Kamonyi, Huye, Rubavu, Gicumbi, Rwamagana, Kicukiro

150,000 89,250,000

Urunana/Triat d'Union

Local Y Monitoring and Evaluation Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Gisagara, Huye

500,000 500,000

Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda

Local Y Capacity Building (and sensitisation)

Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi

53,500,000 53,500,000

Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)

Local Y Capacity Building in cooperatives and Good Governance, Justice

Nyarugenge, Kicikuro, Gasabo, Bugesera, Rwamagana, Gatsibo, Rulindo, Gicumbi,

89,757 53,405,415


59


Registered (Y/N)


stated

Budget RWf

Gakenke, Nyabihu, Ngororero, Karongi, Rubavu, Rutsiro, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Nyamagabe, Gisagara

Solace Ministries Local Y Capacity Building: Leadership counselling and training and research

Kigali Ville, Nyanza, Bugesera

42,020,000 42,020,000

FORUM DES FEMMES RWANDAISE PARLEMENTAIRE

Local N Support to advocacy, development of legislation and general awareness raising

All districts 11,970,000 11,970,000

RESEAU DES PARLEMENTAIRES RWANDAIS POUR LA POPULATION ET DEVELOPMENT

Local N Support to advocacy and sensitization of population issues (RH, HVI, population growt)

All districts 27,626,930 27,626,930

Rwanda Governance Advisory Council

Local N Joint Governance Assessment All districts 124,950,000 124,950,000

Total Local RWf 2,506,529,693


60

ANNEX 4 EDPRS 3 – PUBLIC ORDER AND SAFETY

Name International

or Local Registered

(Y/N) Activities Districts Budget as Reported

RWF unless otherwise stated Budget RWf

AVOCATS SANS FRONTIERES International Y Human rights & Justice

All Districts €373,015 305,499,285

MINES ADVISORY GROUP International Y Conventional weapons destruction & training

Kicukiro & Gatsibo $191,752 114,092,440

INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION

International Y Justice to prosecute cases of violence against minors

Kigali city districts $779,139 463,587,705

GOOD NEWS JAIL AND PRISON MINISTRY

International Y Preaching Repentance, Discipleship, Counselling and Social Welfare Activities

Kigali, Muhanga, Mpanga, & other prisons

$22,350 13,186,500

FONDATION DIDE International Y Support to minors in Gitarama prison

Muhanga 18,952,710 18,952,710

RCN-JUSTICE & DÉMOCRATIE International Y Support to the Justice sector; Institutions and Civil society

All provinces ; various districts €560,000 476,000,000

PENAL REFORM International Y Justice & Monitoring TIG

Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Kamonyi, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyanza, Nyamagabe, Huye, Gisagra, Nyaruguru, Rulindo, Gicumbi, Burera, Gakenke, Musanze, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Ngoma, Kirehe, Bugesera, Nyagatare, Nyabihu ,Ngororero, Rubavu, Rutsiro, Nyamasheke

€852,101 697,870,719


61

Name International

or Local Registered



LIGUE DES DROITS DE LA PERSONNE DANS LA REGION DES GRANDS LACS (LDGL)

International Y Observation of human rights

All Districts $500,702 297,917,690

Total International RFW 2,387,107,049

Kunda Umwana Local Y Human Rights- train parents in child rights,

All Districts 18,000,000 18,000,000

Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda

Local Y Human Rights (Educating children about their rights

Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza and Huye

5,296,000 5,296,000

ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Human Rights (training modules on peace building on youth, training on Human and child rights, creation of cultural clubs

All Districts 319,241,000 319,241,000

Association Rwandaise des Travailleurs Chretiens Feminins

Local Y Training in literacy and human rights and Injustice against Women

Gakenke, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Gisagara, Huye, Bugesera, Rwamagana, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro and Gasabo Districts.

78,674,900 78,674,900

Association Non Crime-Rwanda

Local Y Children’s Rights (sensitizing child rights to mothers in prisons.

All Districts 46,365,750 46,365,750

Never Again-Rwanda Local Y Human Rights (Training on Human Rights)

Kigali €20,000.00 16,380,000

HELP LIFE Local Y Human Rights (chid rights and education

Nyarugenge, Nyakabanda districts

48,629,000 48,629,000

VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Local Y Human Rights Kicukiro district 6,000,000 6,000,000


62

Name International

or Local Registered



(training on law related to families

Youth League for Peace and Conflict Resolution in Great Lakes Region (LPGL)

Local Y Human rights, genocide prevention

Kigali Ville 59,900,000 59,900,000

JYA MU BANDI MWANA Local Y Child Rights Gasabo, Rulindo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro

1,500,000 1,500,000

Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Local Y Human Rights awareness

Ngoma 1,000,000 1,000,000

Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)

Local Y Justice: Genocide survivors

All Districts 47,305,000 47,305,000

Urunana/Triat d'Union Local Y Children’s Rights (sensitizing child rights and mothers inheritance)

Rwamagana, Kayonza 29,828,000 29,828,000

LAWYER OF HOPE Local Y Legal support to prisoners legal assistance and capacity building in law

Gasabo, Nyarugenge 7,071,000 7,071,000

ACTION CHRETIENNE POUR LE DEVELOPMENT COMMUNATAIRE AU RWANDA (ACDCR)

Local Y Capacity Building: Training, Peace and Development, Justice and non-violence

Kicukiro 11,000,000 11,000,000

AJPRODHO-JIUKIRWA Local Y Justice Nyagatare 33,810,000 33,810,000

Civil society Platform Local N Monitoring of the presidential elections All Districts $300,000 178,500,000

Rwanda Men's resource centre Local N Study on gender based violence and masculinity and All Districts $103,753 61,733,035


63

Name International

or Local Registered



trainings

Imbuto Foundation Local N Monitoring and evaluation expert Kigali $162,488 96,680,360

Total Local RFW 1,066,914,045


64

ANNEX 5 EDPRS 4 – ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION


Registered (Y/N)

Activities Districts Budget as Reported

RWF unless otherwise

stated

Budget RWf

SUSTAIN RWANDA-ASSOCIATION FOR THE PROMOTION OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN RWANDA

International Y Protection and sustainable use of the extraordinary biodiversity of Rwanda.

Huye, Nyaruguru 731,840,000 731,840,000

ACDI/VOCA International Y Land use and protection Karongi, Ngororero, Nyamagabe

$807,977 476,706,430

Vi-LIFE PROGRAMME RWANDA International Y Land use, environment and climate change through radical terraces and tree planting

Rulindo ,Gicumbi, Gasabo 469,200,000 469,200,000

CARE International Rwanda International Y EEEGL Burera, Musanze, Nyabihu & Rubavu

US$ 146,799 87,345,405

CARE International Rwanda International Y CASE Huye, Gisagara, Nyamagabe, Nyamagabe

US$100,000 59,500,000

World Vision International Rwanda Program

International Y Biogas installation in 3 Secondary Schools and tree plantation

Bugesera 45,000,000 45,000,000


Africa Transformation Network Local Y Environment (producing charcoal from farm waste, Rocket stoves,

Kicukiro 2,500,000 2,500,000

Rwanda Green Foundation Local Y Agroforestry environment Bugesera, 13,800,000 13,800,000

Prison Fellowship Rwanda

Local Y Environment (sensitization in Reconciliation Villages about Soil Erosion

Kayonza District 880,000 880,000


65


Registered (Y/N)



stated

Budget RWf

Association pour les conseils en developpements

Local Y Environment ( Tree plantation Ngororero, Rubavu, Nyabihu

108,900,000 108,900,000

Youth Forum Sustainable Development

Local Y Environment, Protect and Preserve Environment through sports and Films

All Districts 28,500,000 28,500,000

Inter-church Youth Foundation

Local Y Environment-( Keep Kigali Clean and Green) planting of trees and Sensitization on Environmental Protection

Kicukiro ,Kayonza 17,549,200 17,549,200

Partners in Agriculture and Environment

Local Y Environment (Restoring Social Economic Environmental Rewards for the communities

Nyabihu $49,000.00 29,155,000

Association Abizerana

Local Y Environment (Modern Fire wood) Nyarugenge 7,700,000 7,700,000

Rural Environment and Development Organisation

Local Y Environmental Protection( training of artisans on environmental protection

All Districts $62,000.00 36,890,000

Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)

Local Y Environment (Train communities on water treatment, water source protection, environmental protection

Gasabo 4,700,000 4,700,000

Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)

Local Y Environment, Protect and Preserve Environment

Bugesera, Rwamagana, Kamonyi and Ruhango

43,754,000 43,754,000

VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Local Y Environment (bamboo and tree planting

Kicukiro 6,000,000 6,000,000

Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)

Local Y Environment (Tree planting, build progressive, & bench terraces, sensitizing school children on importance of environment,

Kigali. 222,078,141 222,078,141


66


Registered (Y/N)



stated

Budget RWf

promoting ECOSAN

Abajambo Local Y Environmental Care Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo

1,000,000 1,000,000

Action Nord-Sud Rwanda

Local Y Environmental Burera 100,000,000 100,000,000

Power of Love/ Urukundo association

Local Y Environment Kicukiro 560,000,000 560,000,000

GREENWISE - International Local Y Environment: Waste management at Nyanza Dumpsite

Kigali Ville 46,750,000 46,750,000

Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Local Y Environment Ngoma and Kirehe $24,500 14,577,500

Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Environnemental Support Rubavu, Gicumbi, Kigali, Musanze, Rutsiro

105,966,008 105,966,008

AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION

Local Y Environmental Gasabo 6,800,000 6,800,000

Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)

Local Y Agroforestry( Environment) Nyaruguru and Rulindo 265,300,467 265,300,467

Rwanda Environmental NGO's Forum RENGOF)

Local Y Environment: Capacity Building, climatic change adaptation

Nyabihu 260,000 154,700,000

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY

International N Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke

$41,075.68 24,440,027

Total Local RFW

1,801,940,343


67

ANNEX 6 EDPRS 5 – AGRICULTURE

Name International or

Local

Registered (Y/N)

Activities Districts

Budget as Reported RWF unless stated

otherwise Budget RWf

GARDENS FOR HEALTH INTERNATIONAL

International Y Assisting district to have community gardens and home gardens, Education and Training in nutrition and sustainable agriculture techniques(training for cooperatives on sustainable agriculture techniques)

Gasabo & Nyamagabe districts

$86,553.84 51,499,535

GERMANY AGRO ACTION

International Y Rural and agricultural development Huye district $6,720,000.00 3,998,400,000

VETERINAIRE SANS FRONTIERES

International Y Animal Health Huye, Nyamagabe &Gisagara districts.

€175,110 143,415,090

A.C.O.R.D International Y Decentralisation, good governance, unity & reconciliation as well as food security and women's rights towards land and issues.

Kamonyi, Bugesera, Musanze, Ngororero

282,183,762 282,183,762

TROCAIRE International Y Food security (seed multiplication, food production, food processing & marketing

Kamonyi, Nyanza, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Huye, Nyagatare, Gatsibo, Muhanga, Burera, Gisagara, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Gasabo districts

€511,478 409,182,400

TECHNOSERVE International Y Coffee farming Kirehe, Ngoma, Rwamagana, Rulindo, Nyanza, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Gisagara, Huye, Ngororero, Nyabihu,

$2,208,932 1,314,314,540


68


Local

Registered (Y/N)




Rusizi, & Nyamasheke Districts

LAND O' LAKES,INC International Y Dairy(engage farmers in dairy-related income generating activities for food security and livelihoods)

Nationally and Nyagatare/Gatsibo districts

$1,300,000 773,500,000

CIAT (CENTRO INTERNATIONAL DE AGRICULTURA TROPICAL)

International Y Agricultural research for rural Development

Nyabihu, Burera, Musanze, Gakenke, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Kirehe, Kayonza, Rusizi, Gisagara, Huye, Nyanza, Ruhango, Kamonyi

$23,278,000 13,850,410,000

HEIFER INTERNATIONAL RWANDA

International N Dairy Enterprise development and value chain management marketing & distribution of dairy goats and cows

Nyagatare,Rwamagana,Kayonza,Kirehe,Gicumbi,Musanze,Rulindo,Ngoma,Gakenke,Nyamagabe, Ngororero

$1,750,218 1,041,379,710

TUBURA - One Acre Fund

International Y Agriculture seed and fertilizer provision, training of agronomists, provision of materials for small agricultural projects

Nyamasheke, Karongi, Rusizi, Rutsiro, Nyabihu

$855,000 504,450,000

SECOND A COW RWANDA

International Y Agriculture & Livestock Rulindo, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gasabo, Kirehe, Bugesera & Nyanza

350,000,000 350,000,000

VETERINAIRES SANS FRONTIERES BELGIQUE (VSF/B)

International Y Animal health (supply material & veterinary drugs, train animal health workers)

Southern province, Huye district

€175,110 143,415,090


69


Local

Registered (Y/N)




L'ESPERANCE CHILDREN'S AID RWANDA

International Y Agriculture(development of fruit production,

Karongi district $73,000 43,435,000

PADAB International N Agriculture Bugesera $3,277,311 1,950,000,000

Bamporeze International N Agriculture Bugesera 40,000,000 40,000,000

Ex-Food for the Hungry International

International N Agriculture Kamonyi 60,298,032 60,298,032

SNV International Y Agriculture Kamonyi $9,019 7,386,561

TEARFUND UK International N Agriculture, Disaster Management Kamonyi 2,659,238 2,659,238

CRS International N Agriculture Kamonyi 8,233,228 8,233,228

CSC UGAMA International N Agriculture Kamonyi 25,800,000 25,800,000

DUHAMIC-ADRI International N Agriculture Kamonyi $20,000 19,240,000

SYNDICAT INGABO International N Agriculture Kamonyi 7,111,668 7,111,668

UCF/YWA International N Health, Agriculture Kamonyi 9,992,000 9,992,000

Global Civic Sharing International N Water, Food Kamonyi 3,624,000 3,624,000

SYNDICAT INGABO International N Agriculture Ruhango 1,100,000 1,100,000

TECHNOSERVE International Y Agriculture Ruhango $152,856 90,949,320

LAND O'LAKES INC International Y Agriculture NATIONWIDE $129,072 76,797,625

TEXAS AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT

International N Agriculture Huye, Nyamagabe, Musanze, Burera, Nyabihu, Rusizi

$998,669 594,207,780

CARANA CORP International N Agriculture Kirehe, Gatsibo, Nyanza, Bugesera

$846,740 503,810,333

HEIFER INTERNATIONAL (RWA)

International Y Agriculture: Dairy production, market access, and knowledge

Nyagatare 24,072,100 24,072,100


70


Local

Registered (Y/N)




application

LAND O’LAKES INTERNATIONAL DEV’T

International Dairy production Nyagatare $5,000,000 2,975,000,000

OXFAM GREAT BRITAIN

(ADD)

International Strengthening unity and reconciliation and women Economic Empowerment Programs

Nyagatare and Muhanga, Kirehe, Rulindo, Gakenke,

Nyarugenge, Gasabo

£800,000 768,800,000

CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add)

International Agriculture (food production and income generating activities)

Huye, Gakenke, Gisagara and Nyaruguru

187,977,629 187,977,629

Send a cow Rwanda International Livestock& Agric Gasabo 14,476,462 14,476,462

World Vision International

International Y Agriculture and livestock interventions

Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Huye, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Bugesera, Gatsibo, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Karongi, Gasabo,

$4,625,000 2,775,000,000

Total International RFW

33,052,121,103

Rwanda Green Foundation

Local Y Agri-Processing Industry ( construction of small scale industry for maize and soya processing

Bugesera 90,000,000 90,000,000

Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl

Local Y Agriculture-Training and Plantation Gakenye, Rulindo 4,800,000 4,800,000


71


Local

Registered (Y/N)




Inades Formation Rwanda

Local Y Agriculture- Bugesera 54,686,886 54,686,886

ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Agriculture (provision of inputs, seeds fertilisers pesticides, training

Nyagatare 40,780,009 40,780,009

ASSIST Rwanda Local Y Agriculture (promotion of Agricultural act ivies like animal rearing and Nutrition through Crop farming

Eastern, Southern and Northern Provinces

122,702,472 122,702,472

Rwanda School Garden Initiative

Local Y implementation of vegetable Garden and fruit trees, extension

Karongo, Kicukiro, Rulindo, Nyamashekye and Rusizi

37,556,560 37,556,560

ASPIRE Local Y Agriculture(train women in basic farming, support beneficiaries start small animal rearing projects

Gasabo 15,700,000 15,700,000

Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)

Local Y Agriculture (supply of improved seeds, one cow per family, fertilizers, training

Gatsibo, Kayonza, Nyagatare and Bugesera

23,970,000 23,970,000

Association pour le Developpement Integre et Protection de L Environment (A.I.D.E.P)

Local Y Agriculture (provide high quality seeds for fruit and tree farming information on pre treatment for seed and nursery establishment, construct surface run offs harvesting ponds, empower farmers with appropriate knowledge

Rubavu and Rutsiro $419,400 249,543,000

Rwanda Organic Agriculture Movement(ROAM)

Local Y Agriculture(training on better farming methods, training Agricultural officers, participating

Ngoma, Musanze 80,000,000 80,000,000


72


Local

Registered (Y/N)




in trade fair in Germany, securing the organic certificate, policies

Power of Love - Urukundo association

Local Y Agriculture Kicukiro 160,000,000 160,000,000

Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)

Local Y Agriculture Rubavu, Nyabihu 80,970,780 80,970,780

Association d'Appui aux Cooperatives et Association (UGAMA/CSC)

Local Y Agricultural and Food security Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi

205,000,000 205,000,000

Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Agricultural Support and Credit Huye, Ngoma, Rubavu, Kigali Ville, Musanze, Karongi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyamagabe

1,203,995,818 1,203,995,818


Local Y Agriculture and food Security Rulindo, Gakenye, Muhanga, Kamonyi

187,537,417 187,537,417

Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)

Local Y Sustainable Agriculture education (Nutrition, home garden education and credits

All $ 92,104.00 54,801,880

Institution d'appui aux Agri-eleveurs de Busasamana

Local Y Appuie aux coopératives - Inventior tous les associations cooperatives

Rubavu 940,000 940,000


73


Local

Registered (Y/N)





Local Y Institutional activities ( operations) all districts in which IFR is supporting farmers organisations

73,286,844 73,286,844

Rwanda Organic Agriculture Movement(ROAM)

Local Y capacity building for cooperatives in report preparation, Admin & Operation

Ngoma, Musanze 103,000,000 103,000,000


Local Y Capacity Building (including Cooperatives)

Nyaruguru, Muhanga 113,791,557 113,791,557

RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)

Local Y Crop Intensification Program (CIP) -Sensitise and train farmers towards intensive maize production

Nyagatare 73,289,934 73,289,934


Local Y Catalist -Maize Crop Intensification project using ISFM and participatory demonstration plots approach - Facilitate creation of innovation platforms

Nyagatare 20,241,765

20,241,765


Local Y Food security project -Training in animal traction

Nyagatare &Gatsibo Counted under Trocaire

Counted under Trocaire

Total Local RWF 6,045,169,657


74

ANNEX 7 EDPRS 6 – INDUSTRY AND COMMERCE


Registered (Y/N)

Activities Districts Budget as Reported RWF unless

otherwise stated)

Budget RWf

DIAN FOSSEY GORILLA FUND INTERNATIONAL

International Y Gorilla Conservation Musanze $905,000 533,950,000

MOUNTAIN GORILLA VETERINARY PROJECT

International Y Conservation(Eco-tourism industry) of mountain Gorillas

Musanze $261,000 153,990,000

ART OF CONSERVATION,Inc

International Y Conservation Education Musanze, Burera &Nyabihu $150,018 88,510,620

GORILLA ORGANISATION

International Y Conservation and Protection of gorillas

Musanze, Burera,& Nyabihu districts

$477,392 281,661,280

INTERNATIONAL GORILLA CONSERVATION PROGRAMME

International Y Protect Mountain Gorillas, their habitat and manage the shared ecosystem

Musanze, Rubavu, Burera & Nyabihu

1,195,500 1,195,500

WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY

International Y Conservation, Tourism Promotion and research

Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Nyamasheke, Karongi & Rusizi

$780,569 460,535,710

GREAT APE TRUST OF IOWA/GISHWATI AREA CONSERVATION PROGRAM

International Y conservation of Gishwati Forest Rutsiro $224,000 132,160,000

Tota International RFW

1,652,003,110


Local Y Institutional activities (operations)

All districts in which IFR is supporting farmers organisations

73,286,844 73,286,844

Prison Fellowship Rwanda

Local Y Trade ( income Generating e.g. Goat project)

Kayonza District 880,000 880,000

Caritas-RWANDA Local Y Credit Financing Rusizi, Huye, Kirehe, Ruhango, Karongi, Musanze

19,556,200 19,556,200

Total Local RWF 93,723,044


75

ANNEX 8 EDPRS 7 – FUEL AND ENERGY


Registered (Y/N)


Budget RWf

CARE International Rwanda

International Y CASE Huye, Gisagara, Nyamagabe, Nyamagabe

$53,666 31,931,270

Total International

RWF

31,931,270

Safer Rwanda Local Y Solar energy, construction of solar rural workshop, equipment for the solar workshop training of solar engineers.

Bugesera, Kamonyi, Gicumbi

32,500,000 32,500,000

Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda

Local Y Power Supply (Hydroelectrique) Muhanga 52,326,432 52,326,432


ANNEX 9 - EDPRS 8 – TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS

No International

or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as

Reported Budget RWf


76

ANNEX 10 EDPRS 9 – LAND HOUSING AND COMMUNITY AMENITIES

International or Local Name Activities Districts

Budget as Reported Budget RWf

International CARE International Rwanda ECD Kamonyi $92,435 54,998,825

International CARE International Rwanda CWASA Musanze $13,846 8,238,370

International CARE International Rwanda LIBRAP Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru and Rutsiro

$20,000 11,900,000

Total International

RWF

75,137,195

Local International Choir Association and Instrumental Ensemble

Creation of School of Music in Kigali Nyarugenge 121,000,000 121,000,000

Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul Housing( construction of Head quarters)

Nyarugenge 70,000,000 70,000,000

Local Prison Fellowship Rwanda

Housing (Construction) Kayonza, Musanze, Kamonyi, Bugesera

277,500,000 277,500,000

Local Young Women's Christian Association of Rwanda

Housing ( construction of houses for 14 orphans

Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu, Kayonza and Huye

25,920,000 25,920,000

Local ASSIST Rwanda Housing (construction and equipment of Nyagatare Children and Youth Development Centre.

Nyagatare 202,200,000 202,200,000

Local Bethesda Healing Ministries Shelter Program (construction of a church and Salle Polyvalente)

Nyagatare 308,812,200 308,812,200

Local Power of Love/ Urukundo association

Construction of a School Kicukiro 16,000,000.00 16,000,000

Local Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda

Capacity Building and Community Support (rehabilitation and construction of schools and health

Ngororero, Nyabihu, Muhanga, Bugesera

251,381,222 251,381,222


77



centers)

Local Solace Ministries Land Housing central office construction

Kigali Ville, Nyanza 59,000,000 59,000,000



78

ANNEX 11 - EDPRS 10 – WATER AND SANITATION

International or Local

Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf

International WATER AID Capacity development, sector monitoring, improving accessibility

Bugesera, Kigali 38,062,500 38,062,500

International MOUVEMENT POUR LA LUTTE CONTRE LA FAIM DANS LE MONDE (MLFM)

Water and infrastructure Gicumbi, Gatsibo and Ngoma 969,796,462 969,796,462

International LIVING WATER INTERNATIONAL

Supply of clean water to the community

Karongi $60,000 35,700,000

International PROTOS asbl Clean water & irrigation in Muhanga in partnership with COFORWA, DUHAMIC-ADRI, UGAMA-CSC

Muhanga €178,874 146,497,806

International WATER FOR PEOPLE RWANDA

Water, sanitation and hygiene education

Rulindo, Kicukiro, $153,338 91,236,110

International PAIRB Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Bugesera 130,000,000 130,000,000

International CARE International Rwanda CWASA Musane $160,196 95,316,620

International World Vision Water Supply and Sanitation and Hygiene

Gatsibo, Nyamagabe, Rutsiro, Karongi,

875.000.000 875,000,000


2,381,609,498

Local Rwanda Green Foundation Water management (control of water hyacinth in Akagera river system)

Akagera National Park, Mihindi and Ihema Lakes

38,000,000 38,000,000

Local Association Rwandaise pour l'Amenagement et la Sauvegarde des Infrastructures

construction of water tanks at Birira, Buramira, Kimonyi, Jenda and Bugeshi

Musanze 107,645,431 107,645,431

Local Les Compagnons Fontainiers du Rwanda

Water and Sanitation Ngororero 52,067,200 52,067,200


79

Total Local RFW 197,712,631


80

ANNEX 12 - EDPRS 11 – YOUTH CULTURE AND SPORTS

International or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf

International MIRACLE CORNERS OF RWANDA(MCR)

Community center for youth empowerment, enterprenership, ICT, Tailoring and English training

Bugesera $ 40,600 24,157,000

International INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FELLOWSHIP

Youth development through education, international fellowship and social voluntary works

Gasabo district 460,000,000 460,000,000

International EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER, Inc(EDC)

Youth Livelihood and workforce Development through capacity building.

Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyarugenge

$ 2,079,873 1,237,524,435

International DIGITAL OPPORTUNITY TRUST/DOT Rwanda

Training in ICT ,business and livelihood skills to youth

Kicukiro, Gasabo & Nyarugenge

$ 239,865.00 142,719,675

International RIGHT TO PLAY Education, Health & HIV Prevention (training, regular participation of children, educating them on HIV/AIDS prevention strategies)

Kigali City & Rubavu 317,767,248 317,767,248

International JOINT AID MANAGEMENT (J.A.M) INTERNATIONAL

Welfare (providing the basic needs), education (pay school fees; provide scholastic materials, health, agriculture).

Muhanga 149,947,536 149,947,536

Intenational World Vision Interantional Youth Leaderhip Development, Rwanda Youth Week

Bugesera 31,600,000 31,600,000


Local Jya mu bandi mwana Culture - Music promotion Nyarugenge 17 850 000 17,850,000

Local Association des Etudiants et Eleves Rescapes du Génocide(AERG)

Culture & sports (Sports for togetherness, Genocide Memorial preparations.

All in Rwanda 59,803,000 59,803,000

Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul Culture and Youth All in Rwanda 4,450,000 4,450,000

Local Life World Mission Frontier Culture (spiritual evangelism hope through the word of God

All in Rwanda 11,300,000 11,300,000


81

International or Local Name Activities Districts Budget as Reported Budget RWf

Local ASSIST Rwanda Youth employment in cleaning services, funds for car wash and recycling projects, permits and equipments.

Northern provinces, city of Kigali

45,000,000 45,000,000

Local Youth Generation with a Vision cultural development Musanze, Kigali, Burera 55,328,780 55,328,780

Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural

Culture National level 252,600,000 252,600,000

Local Inter-church Youth Foundation Culture and Sports (Training on Traditional DANCE,

Gasabo and Kicukiro District 16,401,500 16,401,500

Local Parlement des Jeunes Rwandais(PAJER)

Village saving and loan association for the youth, capacity building for Isangano youth centre, youth employment

Gatsibo 140,000,000 140,000,000

Local Education welfare Support TB patients, training on PBF Eastern province, Kigali, Rwamagana, Gasabo

30,000,000 30,000,000

Local BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP Evangelisation Kicukiro, Gasabo, Musanze 6,000,000 6,000,000

Local Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Youth Support Ngoma, Kirehe and Gatsibo 1,500,000 1,500,000

Local Transformational Leadership Center (TLC)

Capacity Building (Youth and Leadership) All in Rwanda € 100,000 81,900,000


CSO: Church Mobilisation, training leaders in Churches

Rwamagana, Nyagatare, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Nyamagabe, Musanze

$ 29,000 16,704,000


Administration ( visitation and Performances

Kigali 6,100,000 6,100,000

Local VISION FOR AFRICA.ORG Good governance( sports for Peace to selected schools

6 sectors of Kicukiro district 6,000,000 6,000,000

Local Youth League for peace and conflict resolution in Great Lakes region: LPGL

Youth Gasabo 116,462,000 116,462,000

Local Imbuto foundation support to youth activities/forum Kigali 51,532,500 51,532,500



82

ANNEX 13 - EDPRS 12 – HEALTH



International POPULATION SERVICE INTERNATIONAL/PSI

Training Anti-Aids club members, distribution of condoms, community mobilization events

All districts 1,992,723,157 1,992,723,157

International CLINTON FOUNDATION Strengthening capacity of Rwandan Health system and Economic development and Poverty reduction programs.

All districts $ 3,090,000 1,838,550,000

International JSI RESEARCH & TRAINING INSTITUTE, INC. (JSI R&T)

Improve injection safety practices, commodity supply management, health care waste management, and health care worker safety.

Western Province 403,619,811 403,619,811

International JOHN SNOW, INC Improving & strengthening the Logistics System, capacity building & country program operations

All districts $ 17,830,268 10,609,009,460

International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL HIV/AIDS clinical care and treatment, health systems strengthening, family planning and reproductive health, HIV/STI primary prevention.

National level & Kigali city, Gakenke and Southern Province excluding Huye & Gisagara

$12,355,165 7,351,323,175

International FONDATION DON CARLO GNOCCHI Health Bugesera £ 147,400 141,798,800

International RWANDA COMMUNITY WORKS Construction of health centres Bugesera 375,171,592 375,171,592

International EI (Earth Institute) RWANDA LLC Technical support, tropical diseases control, training of health facilities staffs, provision of drugs

Bugesera, Rwamagana, Musanze, Gakenke, Nyabihu, Ngoma

347,948,414 347,948,414

International JHPIEGO Maternal & newborn care, Central & district level (Gakenke, $2,072,551 1,233,167,845


83



training of community health workers, clinical training skills, male circumcision

Rubavu, Ruhango, Nyamagabe & Kigali city districts

International DREW CARES INTERNATIONAL Provide Quality HIV/AIDS Prevention care and treatment services for military personnel, their families, as well as the community members who live in areas close to military health care.

All districts $1,844,175 1,097,284,125

International INSTITUTE FOR REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH (GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY)

Health; Reproductive Health and Family Planning through the FAM Project. Awareness-based Methods and increase the youth fertility awareness

All districts $293,546.00 174,659,870

International HEALTH STORE FOUNDATION Health(Operate medical clinics ) Gasabo and Kicukiro districts € 381,400.00 312,366,600

International MILDMAY INTERNATIONAL HIV Palliative care Gasabo, Gicumbi, Rulindo, Nyagatare

$146,409 87,113,355

International RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE (RTI) Prevention of Malaria using Indoor residual spraying (IRS) operation

Gasabo, Nyarugenge ,Kicukiro, Kirehe, Nyanza, Bugesera, Nyagatare

$ 5,801,867 3,452,110,865

International ELIZABETH GLASER PAEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION (EGPAF)

Health(Operate HIV/AIDs clinical services Program)

Gatsibo, Kayonza, Rwamagana, Ngoma, Bugesera, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge

$ 6,865,790 4,085,145,050

International INTRAHEALTH INTERNATIONAL Health and education (adolescent reproductive health services, lessons about the effectiveness of model ARH initiative)

Gicumbi & Nyarugenge districts $111,032 66,064,040

International VISION FOR A NATION Health: eye care, eye glasses coverage and vision correction

Gicumbi district $35,576 21,167,720


84



International CHRISTAIN AID HIV/AIDS and Malaria secure livelihoods, accountable Governance

Gicumbi, Bugesera, Kayonza , Kirehe, Nyamagabe

€328,847 269,325,693

International NORWEGIAN CHURCH AID Health(HIV/IDS), Security, Education and reconciliation

Gicumbi, Kayonza Bugesera, Musanze

517,800,000 517,800,000

International HEALTH UNLIMITED Health(working with youth to access sexual and reproductive health right)

Gisagara, Nyaruguru €138,946.00 113,796,774

International ORAL HEALTH FOUNDATION Constructing a dental clinic Kamonyi € 42,487.00 34,796,853

International MEDICUSMUNDI public health (réhabilitation of clear water sources, agriculture (promotion de la qualification technique des produits artisanau)

Kamonyi € 1,180,184 966,570,696

International CHF INTERNATIONAL Health & Social services, building household resilience (economic strengthening - create youth business groups, food security, education)

Kamonyi, Karongi, Ngororero, Bugesera, Gakenke, Gatsibo, Muhanga, Nyagatare, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Rubavu, Ruhango, Rulindo, Rutsiro, Rwamagana & Kigali city districts

$7,488,210 4,455,484,950

International SURVIVORS FUND Health, education and capacity of building to Genocide survivors

Kamonyi, Rwamagana ,Bugesera, Kayonza, Huye, Nyanza, Ruhango, Rusizi, Kicukiro ,Gasabo, Ngororero

11,670,000 11,670,000

International PARTNERS IN HEALTH Health system strengthening and support procurement of low cost essential medicines

Kayonza (Rwinkwavu hospital) ,Kirehe hospital, Ngoma, Burera(Butaro hospital)

$10,935,000.00 6,506,325,000

International TEARFUND HIV/AIDS Livelihoods, food security, water sanitation 7 cooperatives

Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kicukiro, Nyamagabe, Nyamasheke, Karongi, Kamonyi

$229,775.00 132,580,175

International PROGRAM FOR APPROPRIATE Health: prevention of mother to Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, $ 95,644.00 56,908,180


85



TECHNOLOGY IN HEALTH (PATH) child transmission of HIV/AIDS Rwamagana, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Ngoma districts

International WOMEN EQUITY IN ACCESS TO CARE AND TREATMENT (WE-ACT))

HIV/AIDS (health care to patients, organize sensitization campaigns for behaviour change against HIV/AIDS, and adults counselling)

Kigali city & Nyamasheke 92,770,000 92,770,000

International WAYMAN WORLDWIDE HEALTH PARTNERS

Health sector; community Health Initiatives and Programs .Help MOH to improve the primary health care delivery system in rural area.

Musanze 244,354,382 244,354,382

International ENGENDER HEALTH Improve Maternal and Child Health care by providing support for fistula care and prevention

Musanze, Kicukiro & Nyarugenge $ 669,993 398,645,835

International INTERNATIONAL CENTER FOR AIDS CARE AND TREATMENT PROGRAM (ICAP), MAILMAN SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY

HEALTH(prevention, care, food support and treatment services to HIV/AIDS)

National level $ 1,556,506 926,121,070

International MANAGEMENT SCIENCES FOR HEALTH(MSH)

strengthening Pharmaceutical systems(SPs) Project and the integrated Health strengthening Project(IHSSP)

All Districts $ 7,005,307 4,168,157,665

International HUMANITY FOR CHILDREN Health(health center construction)

Ngoma $ 160,000.00 95,200,000

International AIDS HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION Health on HIV, Care and support in two districts (Gasabo and Nyabihu)

Nyabihu& Gasabo 300,594,988 300,594,988

International PROJET UBUZIMA Health(clinical research on HIV/AIDs)

Nyarugenge $334,171.50 198,832,043


86



International FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL Health( fight against HIV/AIDs),M&E .Capacity building and skills transfer to CNLS, TRA C& MOH

Nyarugenge $ 1,800,000.00 1,071,000,000

International PROJECT SAN FRANCISCO Health (heterosexual study, mutual payment, family planning promotion)

Nyarugenge and Kigali City $ 810,453.00 482,219,535

International ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER -CENTER FOR POVERTY RELATED COMMUNICABLE DISEASES(AMC CPCD Rwanda)

Health sector; Reseacrch on HIV/AIDS, TB and Malaria

Nyarugenge 1,077,000 1,077,000

International BREAST CANCER INITIATIVE East Africa Health Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Kicukiro $ 429,000.00 255,255,000

International FRED HOLLOWS FOUNDATION Health(eye care-prevention of blindness

Rubavu, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Central level

$182,272.00 108,451,840

International FUTURES GROUP INTERNATIONAL Monitoring & evaluation Technical assistance

CNLS, Nyarugenge $ 1,800,000 1,071,000,000

International World Relief HIV/ AIDS prevention program in youth (10-24) in community and schools. Behavior change communication and OVC support

Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Bugesera, Ngoma, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Kirehe, Musanze, Burera, Rusizi, and Nyamasheke

248,014,118 248,014,118

International PSI Rwanda Health Bugesera 110,519,370.0 110,519,370

International Children of God Relief Organisation Health Bugesera 5,000,000.0 5,000,000

International Food for Hungry Health Bugesera 37,458,120.0 37,458,120

International WORLD RELIEF INC Reducing mortality rate and morbidity rate for children under 5 years, combating leading diseases in Rwanda: malaria, diarrhea, pneumonia and

Kirehe, Ngoma, Nyagaguru, Nyamasheke, Gisagara, Nyamagare

$283,741 158,327,478


87



malnutrition. Focus in community mobilization for prevention and Case management

International Columbia University Health Rubavu, Gasabo, Karongi $160,000.00 95,200,000

International Population Services International Health Nationwide $278,190.00 165,523,050

International Family Health International Health Nyarugenge, Kicukiro $79,695.00 47,418,525

International AVSI Health Kamonyi 91,521,550 91,521,550

International FHI Health Kamonyi $ 859,912 511,647,640

International MEDICUS-MUNDI Health, Gender Promotion and Water

Kamonyi € 1,180,190 966,575,610

International Medical Foundation Health Kamonyi $ 31,128 18,521,160

International Fountain of Hope Foundation:FHF Health/HIV/AIDS, fight against poverty

Gasabo 50,333,333 50,333,333

International PSI Health, Social Protection Kamonyi 30,242,300 30,242,300

International OHF Health Kamonyi € 42,487 34,796,853

International Compassion International Education, Health Kamonyi 186,570,095 186,570,095

International SEVOTA Health Kamonyi 16,800,000 16,800,000

International CARSA Health, Economic Development Kamonyi 62,750,000 62,750,000

International ARCT-RUHUKA PSYCHOSOCIAL Muhanga 8,767,200 8,767,200

International ADRA RWANDA Health, Education ,Food security, Economic development, Disaster Management ( Funding RIREP, IBYIRINGIRO Project,

Nyagatare 128,891,783 128,891,783

International ADRA RWANDA AIDS Relief Nyagatare 7,989,884 7,989,884

International JSI Research & Training Institute Inc./MMIS

Health: Injections safety ,Health care waste Management and Health personnel protection;

Nyagatare 10,154,865 10,154,865


88



Install separated waste pits in two health centers; Provide 2 waste bins to each health facility

International MILD MAY INTERNATIONAL HIV Palliative Care Nyagatare $30,679 18,254,005

International PSI-RWANDA ( Population services International )

Health (HIV/AIDS prevention, Family planning , Malaria prevention, safe water system

Nyagatare 75,894,500 75,894,500

International Action for Health& Integrated development

Health Gasabo 89,908,000 89,908,000

International ALARM MINISTRIES Health/HIV/AIDS, Environment/hygiene/sanitation

Gasabo 254,200,000 254,200,000

International ASSOCIATION BAMPOREZE Health Gasabo 163,872 163,872

International BETHESDA HEALING MINISTRIES: BHM Health Gasabo 360,612,200 360,612,200

International POPULATION SERVICES INTERNATIONAL Health NATIONWIDE $ 605,390 360,206,865

International INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE (IRC)

Health Kirehe, Ngoma, Nyagaguru, Nyamasheke, Gisagara, Nyamagare $ 145,600 86,632,000

International ELIZABETH GLASER PAEDIATRIC AIDS FOUNDATION

Health Gatsibo, Kayonza, Nyarugenge, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Kicukiro $43,324 25,777,780

International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL - ROADS II

Health Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Rusizi, Burera, Rubavu $226,400 134,708,000

International FAMILY HEALTH INTERNATIONAL - Clinical

Health Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Muhanga, Ruhangu, Nyamagabe $ 71,667 42,642,120

International ARBEF support to ASRH clinical services Karongi and Rusizi districts 36,888,054 36,888,054

International PSI Santé Ruhango 63,223,489 63,223,489

International Fhi Santé Ruhango 7,330,000 7,330,000

International CSDI Santé /SIDA Ruhango 1,034,619 1,034,619


89



International TROCARE Health Kamonyi € 66,820.00 54,725,580

International CHF INTERNATIONAL (Moved) Health Bugasera, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rutsiro, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Rubavu, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Ruhango, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Gasabo, Rwamagana, Gatsibo, Nyagatare, Gicumbi, Rulindo 5,021,046 2,987,522,489

International CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add) Health (child survival nutrition and HIV/AIDS)

Gisagara and Nyaruguru 174,981,442 174,981,442

International Research Triangle Institute International (Moved)

Health Gasabo 361,831,901 361,831,901

International HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL Health (Mental Health, VIH/SIDA, Epilepsy, Community Based Rehabilitation)

Ngoma, Nyarugenge, Nyanza, Rusizi, Musanze, Huye, Kayonza, Gasabo, Ruhango, Muhanga, Gicumbi, Karongi, Kamonyi, Rulindo, Kicukiro, Gatsibo, Bugesera, Gisagara, Nyagatare, Nyaruguru, Rwamagana

€1,287,821 1,030,256,800

International TULANE INTERNATIONAL LLC (Add) Support to Rwanda’s higher education sector in the health sciences via collaborative strengthening of faculties in pedagogy, integration of IT, applied research, and administrative and managerial systems. Additional support to Rwanda’s National Malaria Control Program

National level $ 2,155,000 1,282,225,000

International SAVE THE CHILDREN Health Burera, Gicumbi US$400,000 238,000,000


90



International CARE International Rwanda CAVA Gatsibo $96,230 57,256,850

International CARE International Rwanda RI Gatsibo $25,795 15,348,025

International CARE International Rwanda ECD Kamonyi $75,884 45,150,980

International CARE International Rwanda HU Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru

$51,011 30,351,545

International CARE International Rwanda GLAI Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara, Huye, Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru

$56,029 33,337,255

International

World Vision International Maternal and Child Health, Nutrition, HIV/AIDS, Malaria, TB,

Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru, Gicumbi, $ 5,780,000 3,510,000,000


70,439,647,863

Local Africa Transformation Network Health (Partnership with KHI to provide Physicians and lecturers

Kicukiro 25,000,000 25,000,000

Local Community Socio-Economic Development Initiative

Health (reduced incidence, and impact of communicable diseases and malnutrition among target communities)

Ruhango District 13,151,000 13,131,000

Local MTN Foundation Health National 33,000,000 33,000,000

Local Prison Fellowship Rwanda Health ( trauma Counselling & Education)

Rilima, Musanze, Ntsinda and Miyove Prisons

17,000,000 17,000,000

Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Health (Payment for Medicine, HIV/AIDS awareness)

Nyagatare, Gatunda Sector 5,550,000 5,550,000

Local Kunda Umwana Health and Nutrition( recruitment & training of nurses, parents on malnutrition, construction of a dispensary, salary

All VUP Sectors 530,400,000 530,400,000


91



Local Association Ihorere Munyarwanda Health ( HIV awareness testing of sex workers and their children, training on HIV/AIDS, Counselling, Access to condoms,

Muhanga, Ruhango, Huye, Musanze ,Rubavu and Gasabo, Ngoma

75,304,817 75,304,817

Local Nsanga Health (sensitization on Hygiene, Sanitation and Nutrition)

Huye 8,300,000 8,300,000

Local Christian People for Humanitarian Action (CPHA)

Health (Prevention, care and Treatment)

Kicukiro and Musanze Districts 26,600,000 26,600,000

Local Rwanda Link Health (Establishing Trauma centres-construction)

Gahanga, Kicukiro 100,000,000 100,000,000

Local Benishyaka Health (Education on reproductive Health)

Nyagatare and Kigali City 24,360,000 24,360,000

Local Action Technique pour un Dévéloppement communautaire(ATEDEC)

Health ( Sensitisation for HIV /AIDS control)

Nyamasheke 8 sectors. 11,042,904 11,142,904


Health(training on good hygiene, sensitization and training on HIV, AIDS prevention, supporting associations with HIV related Activities)

Muhanga, Ruhango, Kamonyi, Rwamagana, Nyabihu an Kayonza

23,361,000 23,361,000

Local Kigali Freedom School Health (seminars on HIV Prevention, visiting HIV+ patients in hospitals)

Kicukiro, Gikondo 5,000,000 5,000,000

Local BENIMPUHWE Health (prevention of HIV Spread, sensitization on reproductive Health

Gisagara 13,153,396 13,153,396

Local Youth Generation with a Vision

Health( training on SINIGURISHA Program

Burera 6,315,750 6,315,750

Local Better Life (BLAO) Achievement Training against HIV and Children Gasabo district 2,100,000 21,000,000


92



Organisation rights on Violence


Health one sector in each district 91,060,000 91,060,000

Local Association Genrale des Handcapes du Rwanda

Health(HIV awareness in people with disabilities, training for local disability leaders and young teen for behaviour change

All districts 23,440,000 23,440,000

Local Love and Hope-Bugingo Health(HIV Prevention and Campaign, prevention of disease caused by dirt

Kayonza, Gatsibo 2,200,000 2,200,000

Local Inter-church Youth Foundation

Health (capacity building- training of community Organisation and local leaders,

Kayonza 40,000,000 40,000,000

Local Kigali Hope Association

Capacity Building on HIV/AIDS prevention and awareness

Nyarugenge 235,952,400 235,952,400

Local Handicapé Rwandais Rehabilité Réintegré dans ses Droits (HRD)

Health( Testing of children with hearing deficiency, training of personnel to use the machine

Muhanga 23,000,000 23,000,000

Local Association Pour (APTM) la Promotion des Travaux ménager

Health (training peer Educators, Voluntary testing,

Musanze 4,000,000 4,000,000

Local Bethesda Healing Ministries Health (reinforcing HIV preventive measures within the youth and vulnerable children, capacity building in HIV prevention measures within youth, mobilising parents and children about reproductive health

Kayonza 51,800,000 51,800,000

Local National Organisation of User and Health (training and counselling) Kicukiro and Kayonza and 5,674,800 5,674,800


93



Survivals of Psychiatry Nyagatare districts

Local TABARA Health (Universal Access to integrated HIV/AIDS services

Burera 13,814,550 13,814,550

Local ISHYANGA RYERA Health (providing mutuell to 500 people,

MVK 700,000 700,000

Local Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)

Health (train Health Information Teams on HIV, Community Mobilization on HIV/,AIDS clubs in schools, Family Planning)

Gasabo 2,400,000 2,400,000

Local Association National de Soutien aux Personnes vivant avec le VIH/SIDA (ANSP+)

Health (Sensitisation On HIV Prevention, Family Planning

Nyanza 3,610,000 3,610,000

Local ASPIRE Health( Trauma counselling,, sexual and reproductive health, empowering them to have access to mutuelle de santé

Gasabo 24,400,000 24,400,000

Local Voice of Community Organisation Health (Train Adolecents on reproductive Health, train community on water treatment

Kicukiro 523,500 523,500

Local Hope Foundation Health( school hygiene for girls, equipping girls hygiene rooms, train good mothers and teachers in counselling

Ruhango 15,000,000 15,000,000

Local Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)

Health ( support associations of HIV+ People, BCC Campaign in community, door to door campaigns on HIV and Family Planning

Southern and Northern Province in Nyaruguru/ Gakenke District

115,200,000 115,200,000

Local GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, Sante (HIV/AIDS Awareness) Nyaruguru $ 24,500.00 14,577,500


94



PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)

Local BUSINESS MEN'S FELLOWSHIP HIV/AIDS Kicukiro 4,600,000 4,600,000

Local Integrated Family Care Organisation (IFCO)

Health (HIV/AIDS prevention, modern contraceptives, OVC)

All 106,200,000 106,200,000

Local LIGHT ASSOCIATION Health and sanitation awareness Kicukiro 1,140,000 1,140,000

Local ASSOCIATION RWANDAISE DE PROMOTION D'INTERET COMMUN (ARPIC)

Sante (HIV/AIDS Awareness, Condom distribution)

Nyarugenge 950,000 950,000

Local KEMIT asbl Health: awareness thru TV and Films

All 40,666,644 40,666,644

Local Power of Love/ Urukundo association

Health: HIV/AIDS Control Nyamasheke, Rusizi 86,000,000 86,000,000

Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Sante Gasabo 3,000,000 3,000,000

Local Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)

Sante: HIV/AIDS Control Rubavu, Nyabihu 8,520,000 8,520,000

Local ESPOIR DE L'ENFANT asbl Sante Kigali Ville 290,114 290,114

Local Association Ejo Nzamera Nte Sante: HIV/AIDS Control All Eastern Province Districts $35,000.00 20,825,000

Local Association Rwandaise de Lutte Contre la Pauvrete (ALUPA)

Health (HIV/AIDS, Hygiene and Nutrition)

Ngororero 10,151,000 10,151,000

Local Caritas-RWANDA Health Support Kigali Ville, Rusizi, Huye, Musanze, Rubavu, Ruhango, Ngoma, Nyamasheke, Nyamagabe, Nyabihu

318,182,972 318,182,972

Local Association des Veuves du Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA)

Sante (Psycho-Medical) All 46,225,000 46,225,000

Local Association pour le Bien etre Social (A.B.E.S)

Sante Musanze 11,256,860 11,256,860

Local Association pour le Development Agro-Pastoral (ADAP)

Sante: HIV/AIDS Control, Mutuelle de sante

Musanze 13,040,352 13,040,352


95



Local African Evangelistic Enterprise (AEE-Rwanda)

Sante: HIV/AIDS programs, training, Health Insurance

Bugesera, Muhanga, Huye, Rubavu, Gicumbi, Kigali Ville

257,260,339 256,460,339

Local AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION Sante (HIV/AIDS) Gasabo 6,000,000 6,000,000

Local Urunana/Triat d'Union Health Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Bugesera, Gisagara, Gatsibo, Ngoma, Huye

478,912,324 478,912,324

Local Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda

Sante: HIV/AIDS sensitisation Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi

45,500,000 45,500,000

Local Make a Difference Initiative Sante: HIV/AIDS Advocacy, sexual education, anti Aids clubs, Counselling

All (in 15 schools), Kigali Ville, Ruhango, Nyanza, Rwamagana, Nyabihu

128,200,000 128,200,000

Local Umbrella des Personnes en situation de Handicap luttant contre le VIP et le SIDA (UPAHLS)

Health: HIV/AIDS (data collection, sensitisation, workshop, etc)

All 68,520,620 68,520,620

Local Rwanda Network of People Living with HIV/AIDS (RRP+)

Health: HIV/AIDS Treatment, coordination

All $ 203,231.00 120,922,445

Local BAMPOREZE Sante: build capacity of HIV care givers and technical support

Nyabihu, Rubavu, Kicukiro, Nyarugenge, Ngororero

$ 129,587.00 77,104,265

Local Solace Ministries Health: ARV Clinic construction Gasabo 62,000,000 62,000,000

Local National Organisation of User and Survivals of Psychiatry

Administration & Operation ( office equipment, recruitment and Training

Kanombe and Karangazi sectors 19,789,200 19,789,200

Local Center for addiction &Psychosocial orientation: CAPO

Sensitization Gasabo 17,018,200 17,018,200

Local Catholic Relief Services Rwanda HIV/AIDS, NUTRITION Gasabo $ 83,476 49,668,220

Local CHABHA (Children affected by HIV/AIDS) Health Gasabo 21,366,000 21,366,000


96



Local COMMUNITY SOCIO-ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT:CSDI

health, Education Gasabo 132,937,170 132,937,170

Local Inter-Church youth foundation Health Gasabo 38,444,700 38,444,700

Local JSI Research &training Institute Inc/MMIS

Health Gasabo 3,931,000 3,931,000

Local Umbrella des Personnes en situation handicap luttant contre le VIH/SIDA

Health Gasabo 67,936,466 67,936,466

Local ARBEF Prevention VIH/SiDA Kayonza 8,400,000 8,400,000

Local

ARDR Prevention du VIH/SIDA Renforcement de capacité des Cooperatives

Kayonza

17,324,000 17,324,000

Local SWAA-RWANDA "IHIMURE" HIV/AIDS Program, Kayonza 23,008,020 23,008,020

Local Partners in Health Health and support on social and Economic rights (POOSER)

Kayonza 993,785,256 993,785,256

Local UYISENGA N'MANZI Education Sante DVPt -psychosocial infants and orphans

Kayonza 5,547,681 5,547,681

Local ADRA Rwanda Prevention VIH/SiDA, Prise en charge nutritionnelle et réduction de la pauvrete des PVVIH/SIDA /special Needs Education Inclusive Education.

Kayonza

17,065,750 17,065,750

Local RWANDA NGO FORUM ON HIV/AIDS HIV prevention activities national level 1,804,000 1,804,000

Local RWANDA DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION (RDO)

Malaria prevention and control -

Sensitize community

mobilisers(community health

workers and local authorities) on

malaria prevention and control

Mobilise opinion leaders on

7 districts of Eastern province 400,000,000 400,000,000


97



malaria prevention and control



98

ANNEX 14 - EDPRS 13 – EDUCATION



International ORPHANS OF RWANDA University Education All Districts $ 614,687 365,738,765

International RWANDA GIRLS INITIATIVE Education Bugesera $1,437,712 855,438,640

International FONDATION BLEU CIEL Primary & Secondary school Burera, Gakenke, Musanze 118,143,752 118,143,712

International AMICI DEI POPOLI ONG Youth school fees Gatenga youth center, work centre

Kigali City € 46,700 38,247,300

Interenational World Vision International Rwanda

School construction, capacity building, school fees, and school materials

All Districts $ 5,950,000 3,570,000,000

International VSO(Voluntary Service Overseas)

Teacher Training, disability Program and HIV/AIDs Prevention in schools

All Districts € 489,415 470,817,230

International GREEN HELMETS NGO Vocational Training (construction & solar technology), Training of trainers-teachers, English courses for villagers

Bugesera € 125,000 120,250,000

International UNIVERSAL ISLAMIC & CULTURAL TRUST (UICT)

Unity Holistic education Center(a secondary school and social empowerment)

Gasabo $130,100 77,409,500

International CHABHA (Children Affected by HIV/AIDs)

Pay mutuelle de Sante and school fees to children affected by HIV/AIDS

Gasabo & Kicukiro 45,565,710 45,565,710

International STORIES FOR HOPE RWANDA Training in narrative psychology, booklets for secondary students

Gasabo & Gicumbi $44,925 26,730,375

International BRIDGE2RWANDA Education & entrepreneurship Gasabo & Musanze $ 75,200 44,744,000

International WELLSPRING FOUNDATION FOR EDUCATION

Operate a secondary school in Gasabo district and training program in Kigali city

Gasabo ,Kicukiro & Nyarugenge $996,257 592,772,915

International GOOD NEIGHBOURS Education & Community development. Gasabo and Kamonyi $73,638.00 43,814,610

International INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION EXCHANGE

School based teacher training Gasabo and Nyabihu $ 192,172 114,342,340

International AFRICAN ANCHOR OF HOPE.INC.

Payment of school fees children, professional counselling to parents and children

Gasabo 16.665.000 16,665,000

International ISOKO INSTITUTE Education investment & Gasabo $ 22,680 13,494,600


99



entrepreneurship

International ACADEMY FOR EDUCATIONAL DEVELOPMENT (AED)

Interactive educational portal accessing and sharing education materials

All Districts $1,249,000 720,673,000

International DIRECT-AID (AMA) Scholarships, financing cultural activities, training of teachers

Gatsibo, Gasabo, Bugesera 553.340.000 553,340,000

International ESTHER'S AID Education, Dev't, Skills training & Primary school sponsorship

Kicukiro & Gasabo $ 617,610.00 367,477,950

International AL MAKTOUM FOUNDATION Education Kicukiro and Muhanga 266.009.527 266,009,527

International A PARTNER IN EDUCATION Building School Kicukiro 134,654,237 134,654,237

International AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT & EDUCATION FOUNDATION (A.D.E.F)

Kicukiro educational center, Extension of Rwamagana training center, training in religious studies, support female families to form cooperatives)

Kicukiro, Gatsibo, Rwamagana, Nyagatare, Kayonza, Rutsiro, Huye, Kirehe

261,500,000 261,500,000

International ONE LAPTOP PER CHILD (OLPC) Support MOE in the planning of the laptop project

Kigali city & central level $ 446,000 265,370,000

International EDUCAT Education/Training, community development

All Districts $ 361,500 215,092,500

International WORLD LEARNING- SCHOOL FOR INTERNATIONAL TRAINING (SIT) STUDY ABROAD

Education/intercultural relations Kigali city ,Bugesera, Huye $140,000 83,300,000

International WERNER KALKA FOUNDATION Education targeting orphans from cooperatives

Kigali city, Gasabo 14,754,000 14,754,000

International RWANDA AID Education, health care, welfare financing, vocational training, conservation and development

Nyamasheke & Rusizi 279,180,000 279,180,000

International ASSOCIATION MABAWA ASBL Education and infrastructure development

Nyaruguru 159,400,000 159,400,000

International WORLD VISION Rwanda Training teachers, construction of schools, nutrition & food security

Rulindo, Bugesera, Gasabo, Kicukiro, Gicumbi, Nyamagabe, Huye, Nyaruguru, Gatsibo, Rutsiro, Karongi, Gakenke

16,368,927 16,368,927

International CORNERSTONE DEVELOPMENT LTD

Operate Cornerstone Leadership Academy

Rwamagana 129,924,600 129,924,600


100



International MAD 4 AFRICA Renovation of classrooms, construction of professional training centers

Nyarugru € 13,485 11,044,215

International Plan Rwanda Education: School feeding Bugesera $ 2,000,000 1,924,000,000

International Millennium village Project Agriculture, Health, and Education Bugesera $9,000,000 8,658,000,000

International Compassion International Education Bugesera 658,000,000 658,000,000

International Africa Transformation Network Education Bugesera 29,430,000 29,430,000

International Mosaic Foundation Education Bugesera $ 630 606,060

International Good Neighbours International Education Kamonyi $31,254 30,066,348

International ADRA Education, Economic Development Kamonyi 33,590,514 33,590,514

International FH/Rwanda Education, Health, agriculture et microprojects

Muhanga 10,317,330 10,317,330

International HI Education, VIH Muhanga 39,253,000 39,253,000

International CLUB SPIC Education Kamonyi 11,525,300 11,525,300

International F.H ASSOCIATION RWA ( Food for Hungry )

Education, Health Nyagatare 22,386,930 22,386,930

International WINROCK INTERNATIONAL Education - Child labor reduction through education in Rwanda

Nyagatare 6,503,600 6,503,600

International CARITAS/HIGA UBEHO Education Nyagatare $154,000 148,148,000

International EPR-HIGA UBEHO Education Nyagatare $169,000 162,578,000

International AFRICA ANCHOR OF HOPE INC: AOH

Education, Health Gasabo 24,472,400 24,472,400

International Africa Muslims Agency:AMA Health, Education, Construction Gasabo 104,000,000 104,000,000

International ESTER'S AID FOR NEEDY & ABANDONED CHILDREN

Education, Health project Gasabo $146,610 141,038,820

International FRATERNITE ST PAUL Education Gasabo 4,770,000 4,770,000

International CENTRE MAREMBO Education Gasabo 46,416,635 46,416,635

International GOOD NEIGHBOURS RWANDA Education, health, microcredit Gasabo $42,384 40,773,408


101



International

HEALTH DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVE-RWANDA:HDI

Education, Health insurance Gasabo 18,740,000 18,740,000

International SAVE THE CHILDREN Child Protection and Health Gicumbi ,Rubavu, Ruhango, Burera $484,000 396,396,000

International

DUHAMIC ADRI

Education et volet Economique Ruhango

$94,000 90,428,000

International SNV Education Ruhango € 4,846 3,968,874

International CHF Higa ubeho Education Ruhango $223,606 215,108,972

International HANDICAP INTERNATIONAL

Education(Inclusive Education) Gasabo, Kamonyi, Kayonza, Muhanga, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Gakenke, Ngororero, Nyamagabe, Nyamiyaga, Rubavu, Rulindo,

€427,797 342,237,600

International CONCERN WORLDWIDE USA (Add)

Education Gakenke, Gisagara and Nyaruguru 79,976,280 79,976,280

International CARE International FOFI Musane $92,050 54,769,750

International COSMO Gatsibo, Nyagatare ; Nyamagabe, Nyaruguru; Karongi, Ngororero, Nyabihu, Rutsiro and Rubavu

$13874 8,255,030

Total International

RFW

23,298,020,504

Local SANEJO Education (Training of English Teachers and Rehabilitation of classrooms

Nyamagabe, Ruhango 2,270,000 2,270,000

Local MEG Foundation Education(Free pre and primary education of local poor children, meals for the 200 children in school, provide literacy classes to local Adults

Kigali City, Gasabo 11,700,000 11,700,000

Local Poverty Reduction, Education and Family Empowerment in Rwanda (PREFER)

Education ( distribute school supplies to 3 schools to 1500 students construction of class rooms, school kitchen, tuition fees payment, rehabilitation of existing

Musanze district 38,300,000 38.300,000


102



classrooms

Local Seed of Hope Association Education Building a classroom, running the school

Gasabo 340,000,000 340,000,000

Local Africa Transformation Network Education (IT training and equipment, Business start up consulting, literacy training material, online English training,

Kigali Kicukiro, Huye 35,365,000 35,365,000

Local African Community Empowerment

Construction of the school, equipping it, food for students, salaries of the staff and office utility

Nyagatare $526,769 313,427,555

Local Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Ministries

Education Welfare -Payement du minerval pour 281 enfants, 72 enfants non accompagnés ont été hebergés

Kicukiro $77,867 46,330,865

Local Community Socio-Economic Development Initiative

Education (vocational training in Ruhango District, increase capacity of 30 cooperatives, increase entrepreneurship among cooperatives

Ruhango District in all sectors 27,912,800 27,912,800


Continuous Technical Education Kicukiro 5,500,000 5,500,000

Local MTN Foundation Education National 33,000,000 33,000,000

Local Association Saint Vincent de Paul

Education (distribution of scholastic materials, other education support

Rwamagana, different parishes and districts of the country

10,500,000 10,500,000

Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Education (Extension of deaf School, equipments , school materials, Training


Local Life World Mission Frontier Education ( more classes, renovation of old buidings at world Mission Ministries

Gasabo district 16,362,000 16,362,000

Local Fondation Artisans de la Paix et du Developpement aux Rwanda asbl

Education (Literacy- training) Rulindo 2,750,000 2,750,000

Local Inades Formation Rwanda Education Rulindo 23,246,943 16,346,943

Local Centre Marembo Education (community environmental awareness, youth vocational classes,

Gasabo 19,838,700 19,838,700


103



Local Kunda Umwana Education ( construction of a Nursery School, training of teachers, school equipments

All VUP Sectors 5,441,511,240 5,441,511,240

Local Benishyaka Education (providing Tuition fees, accomondation, meals, scholastic materials

all districts, country wide 26,143,477 26,143,477


Education (taking school dropouts back to school, helping 122 orphans at higher Institutions of Learning, Vocational training to orphans


15,385,000 15,385,000

Local ASSIST Rwanda Education and training, sponsorship, counselling AIDS prevention awareness and Advocacy

National level 44,860,000 44,860,000

Local Technical and Vocational Schools Association in Rwanda (TEVSA)

Education (study strips, TOT, inter school exams, curriculum harmonisation ,industrial attachment, partnerships with other regional Institutions

National level 6,951,000 6,951,000

Local Reach the Children Of Rwanda International (RCRI)

Education. Construction of a boarding primary and a secondary school, Enrolling vulnerable children and providing them with scholastic materials.

Nyabihu, Kicukiro district, Kicukiro sector 2,503,238,826 2,503,238,826


Education National level 16,450,000 16,450,000

Local Handicapé Rwandais Rehabilité Réintegré dans ses Droits (HRD)

Promoting Education of children with disabilities

Muhanga 27,650,000 27,650,000


104



Local Rwanda Multi- Learning Center Education.(buying classroom materials, recruitment of computer learners, English learners and music learners, buying bookshelves

Kigali ,Gasabo 12,942,000 12,942,000

Local Association of Ugandans in Rwanda

Education ( primary School) Gasabo 10,000,000 10,000,000

Local Never Again-Rwanda Education (Technical and Vocational Training for the young women leadership devt, training youth in initiating projects

Selected schools in Kigali city, all never again youth clubs, in Kicukiro, Huye, Bugesera, Kayonza, Gatsibo, Nyabihu, Muhanga, Gisagara and Nyarugenge Districts.

$187,000 107,899,000

Local Action for Integration Health Development (AHID)

Education ( train HITS in Leadership skills, youth on EDPRS

Gasabo 1,200,000 1,200,000

Local ASPIRE Education ( reduce literacy) Gasabo 3,000,000 3,000,000

Local HELP LIFE Education ( setting up youth outreach ministries, in secondary school

Gasabo 200,000 200,000

Local Hope Foundation Education( Providing school fees, and other requirements to vulnerable children

Ruhango 15,000,000 15,000,000

Local Education Rwanda Education welfare(providing scholastic materials to 400 vulnerable children,

Eastern province, Kigali ville, Rwamagana, Gasabo

30,000,000 30,000,000

Local Abajambo Education Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo 18,000,000 18,000,000

Local Association des Religieux de la Compagnie de Jesus au Rwanda

Educational Support Gasabo, Huye and Rusizi 586,400,000 586,400,000

Local Association des Parents Pour l'Education de Kirehe (APEKI-AMIZERO)

Education Kirehe 29,400,000 29,400,000


105



Local Action Nord-Sud Rwanda

Education Burera 27,500,000 27,500,000

Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Education: School Construction Gasabo 400,000,000 400,000,000

Local ESPOIR DE L'ENFANT asbl Education Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kigali Ville 14,174,600 14,174,600

Local Dominicaines de l'Annociation Education Gakenke, 17,400,100 17,400,100


Vocational Training Rulindo 57,258,750 57,258,750

Local Caritas-RWANDA Education support Gicumbi, Kigali Ville, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ngoma, Rubavu, Musanze

188,808,336 188,808,336

Local Congregation des Soeurs Abizaramariya

Education Ruhango, Huye 331,596,223 331,596,223


Vulnerable Children (education), Musanze 10,062,100 10,062,100


Education support Rubavu, Kigali Ville €500,391.00 409,820,229

Local PEACE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL

Education support Nyanza 81,000,000 81,000,000

Local CONGREGATION DE LA MISSION-PERES LAZARISTES

Social science research Gakenke 15,000,000 15,000,000

Local ACTION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Education (Vocational and schooling support)

Nyagatare 2,050,000 2,050,000

Local Make a Difference Initiative Capacity Building (peer education) 13,905,000 13,905,000


106




Education: Theological and Peace education

Kigali Ville $16,600.00 9,877,000

Local Children's Care and Protection in Rwanda (CCPRWA)

Education: elementary and vocational training

Rwamagana 22,916,000 22,916,000


Administration and Operation Nyarugenge 25,883,000 25,883,000

Local Kigali Freedom School

Good Governance( fight Genocide Ideology, Survivor Advocacy)

Kicukiro, Gasabo, Nyarugenge 3,100,000 3,100,000

Local HOPE FOR THE FUTURE: HOFF Education, Health Gasabo 13,535,000 13,535,000

Local INTERNATIONAL YOUTH FELLOWSHIP

Education, Projects Gasabo 14,550,000 14,550,000

Local International Education Exchange

Education Gasabo $288,803 277,828,486

Local RWANDA MULTI-LEANING CENTRE: RMLC Local

Training Gasabo $2,330,000 2,241,460,000

Local RWANDA OUTREACH & COMMUNITY PARTNERS

Education Gasabo €272,000 222,768,000

Local UNIVERSAL ISLAMIC AND CULTURAL TRUST

Reintegration of Children Gasabo $243,600 234,343,200

Local WERNER KALKA FOUNDATION Education Gasabo 14,178,000 14,178,000

Local SURF: Survivor' fund Education, building Gasabo 17,500,000 17,500,000

Local COPAFE EDUCATION PARENTING Kayonza 121,400,000 121,400,000

Local AVEGA EDUCATION AND Developpement, Justice Kayonza

67,425,000 67,425,000

Local FAWE Rwanda Education - research project Kayonza

$16,100,344 15,488,530,688


107



Local SUSO RWANDA Education Ruhango 285,200,000 285,200,000



108

ANNEX 15 - EDPRS 14 – SOCIAL PROTECTION



International COMPASSION INTERNATIONAL Social welfare to vulnerable students All districts 7,138,598,604 7,138,598,604

International RWANDA AVENIR Assisting Genocide Survivors Bugesera 26,936,275 26,936,275

International RAFIKI FOUNDATION , Inc. Orphanages and schools Bugesera $225,500 134,172,500

International NIBAKURE CHILDREN'S VILLAGE

Social, education, health and housing for orphans

Bugesera $54,300 32,308,500

International RWANDA PARTNERS Poverty alleviation & Community Development

Bugesera . 25,144,200 25,144,200

International AQUADEV CENTRAL AFRICA Microfinance Gasabo 309,000,000 309,000,000

International UBUNTU EDMONTON Supporting programs for Genocide widows in Kimironko

Gasabo 103,000,000 103,000,000

International World Vision International Social welfare for vulnerable children 14 districts 510,000,000 510,000,000

International AEGIS TRUST Genocide related programs Gasabo 4,674,681,866 4,674,681,866

International LA BENEVOLENCIJA (RLB) Communication for reconciliation through media

Gasabo $417,914 342,271,566

International AKIRAH Operate Akilah Institute for Women Gasabo $203,700 121,201,500

International INTERNATIONAL ALERT Fostering social and economic reintegration and reconciliation

Gasabo& Gisagara $421,152 250,585,440

International SOS VILLAGES D'ENFANTS Social, Health, Education orphans & abandoned children

Gasabo, Gicumbi & Nyamagabe 1,520,796,108 1,520,796,108

International PLAN RWANDA Child centred Community Development

Gatsibo 1,622,000,000 1,622,000,000

International AVSI Health, education, economic development,..

Gatsibo, Kamonyi, Ruhango, Nyanza, Gicumbi

617.344.850 617,344,850

International JESUIT REFUGEE SERVICE(JRS) Nursery, education and training for refugees

Gicumbi & Karongi 410,743,980 410,743,980


109



International SAVE THE CHILDREN Child protection Nyamagabe, Nyaryguru, Karongi US$200,000 119,000,000

International AMERICAN REFUGEE COMMITTEE (ARC) INTERNATIONAL

To provide water, sanitation, health care in refugee camp

Gicumbi, Gatsibo and Karongi 426,727,984 426,727,984

International ZOE MINISTRY/Rwanda socioeconomic program(Empowering orphans and other vulnerable children

Huye, Nyaruguru, Gisagara 187,526,744 187,526,744

International GLOBAL CIVIC SHARING RWANDA

Micro-credit loans, basic health and Sanitation.

Kamonyi 176,104,000 176,104,000

International AFRICAN HUMANITARIAN ACTION

Health activities in refugee camps Karongi 375,092,680 375,092,680

International A VOICE OF RWANDA Support to orphans, vulnerable families.

Kicukiro 20,358,500 20,358,500

International CAFOD Psychosocial support to people suffering from trauma

Kigali city , Rubavu, Nyanza, Nyamagabe

$48,000 39,312,000

International PROJECT RWANDA Project Rwanda cargo bikes, train mechanics

Kigali city, Gakenke, Rubavu, Huye, Nyagatare, Musanze

$787,000 468,265,000

International INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE

Expanded impact child survival Kirehe, Ngoma $683,788 406,853,860

International FH ASSOCIATION/ RWANDA Community Development Program Education-Pay school fees , Distribution of Livestock-cows, agriculture: Provide fertilizers and manure to beneficiaries, health and nutrition

Muhanga, Kamonyi, Nyagatare, Muhanga, Ruhango, Gatsibo, Bugesera, Gisagara, Burera, Musanze, Nyamasheke and Rusizi

513,595,492 513,595,492

International E3 PARTNERS Community capacity building and development

Nyabihu, Kayonza and Nyagatare

$168,000 99,960,000

International NEW BEGINNING RWANDA Operate a Community center in Education and health services

Nyagatare 36,599,100 36,599,100


110



International ADRA - RWANDA Education, Agriculture and Gender equality.

Nyagatare , Gatsibo ,Kayonza, Ngoma, Kirehe, Rwamagana, Bugesera, Karongi ,Rubavu, Nyabihu , Rutsiro, Burera, Gakenke, Rulindo &Gicumbi, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Kamonyi, Muhanga

$2,527,205 1,503,686,975

International WORLD RELIEF RWANDA Economic Development Program: Savings for life, income generating activities promotion

Nyamasheke, Kicukiro , Musanze, Bugesera

74,903,853 74,903,853

International WORLD RELIEF RWANDA Child Development: provide life lessons (develop children physically, cognitively , socially and spiritually) children aged 7-12. Support OVC paying health insurance, and school fees. Provide water collection tanks and water sand filters to vulnerable families to help them to have access to clean water

Kicukiro 37,140,880 37,140,880

International CATHOLIC RELIEF SERVICES Food security, HIV/AIDs prevention, microfinance projects and peace building

Nyanza,Huye,Gisagara,Ruhango,Muhanga,Kamonyi,Kayonza,Gatsibo,Rwamagana,Ngoma and Rusizi

$10,761,070 6,209,137,390

International SAVINGS BANK FOUNDATION FOR INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION

Microfinance supervision through development and training of Microfinance Supervision

Nyarugenge $272,000 222,768,000

International WINROCK INTERNATIONAL Child Labor reduction through education

Nyarugenge, Nyaruguru, Gicumbi, Nyamasheke, Rubavu, Kayonza & Nyagatare

$1,584,421 942,730,495


111



International FxB INTERNATIONAL Support for orhpans, vulnerable children and destitute families affected by Aids

Nyarugenge, Kicukiro, Rubavu, Muhanga, Nyamagabe

$842,430 501,245,850

International HUMAN HELP NETWORK Women empowerment , child right Promotion and child protection

Nyaruguru , Kicukiro, Gasabo, Rusizi, Nyamasheke, Nyamagabe, Huye

$247,000 202,293,000

International GLOBAL OUTREACH INTERNATIONAL

Support orphans , widows and street children by paying school fees and other rural projects

Nyaruguru, Musanze, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Burera,

4,735,000 4,735,000

International MERCY MINISTRIES INTERNATIONAL(MMI)

community development ,empowerment ,healing and reconciliation

Rubavu and Gicumbi s $22,000 13,090,000

International FEMMES DEVELOPMENT asbl Micro finance, child villages and health centres

Ruhango & Nyamasheke 73.200.000 73,200,000

International RUANDA STIFTUNG Social and alimentary support for poor families

Rulindo $108,611 104,483,782

International WOMEN FOR WOMEN INTERNATIONAL

Life skills training, direct financial aid, farming hair dressing, tailoring

Rwamagana, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kayonza

694,212,690 694,212,690

International AFRICAIRE Emergency humanitarian Aid Rwamagana, Gasabo ,Kicukiro $368,051 218,990,345

International Care International Microfinance Bugesera $49,027 29,171,065

International PASAB Microfinance Bugesera 500,000,000 500,000,000

International Tear Fund Microfinance Bugesera 6,000,000 3,570,000,000

International HIGA Ubeho Poverty Reduction, Cooperatives Bugesera $570 339,150

International Accord Rwanda Social Economic Bugesera 46,000,000 46,000,000

International ACORD Socio Economic Development Kamonyi 19,589,102 19,589,102

International CARE Social Protection Kamonyi $76,000 45,220,000

International CHF International Social Protection Kamonyi $407,232 242,303,040


112



International SURF Genocide Survivors Kamonyi 19,500,000 19,500,000

International Women Development Micro Finance Kamonyi 10,000,000 10,000,000

International CARITAS KABGAYI Social Protection Kamonyi $67,783 40,330,885

International CEFAPE Kamonyi Disabled, Agriculture Kamonyi 291,440,808 291,440,808

International COCOF Gender Promotion Kamonyi $48,317 39,571,623

International DUTERIMBERE Women Promotion (Microfinance) Kamonyi 12,810,000 12,810,000

International PDK Socio Economic Development Kamonyi 220,000,000 220,000,000

International ADPR/TURAMIRANE Social Protection Kamonyi 40,404,700 40,404,700

International ARCT-RUHUKA Social Protection Kamonyi 3,139,000 3,139,000

International FXB Famille Muhanga 130,082,000 130,082,000

International WFWE Assistance financière aux femmes affectees par le genocide

Muhanga 127,530,000 127,530,000

International DUTERIMBERE Devpt economique de la femme (Entreprenariat), Microfinance

Muhanga 6,000,000 6,000,000

International Society for Women and Aids in Africa

VIH Muhanga 12,601,850 12,601,850

International Young Women’s Christian Association

Le bien être social : Santé et affaires sociales, Education, sport et culture, jeunesse, Bonne gouvernance, Genre et promotion de la femme SIDA

Muhanga 6,853,000 6,853,000

International Centre de Services aux Coopératives

promotion des groupements et Coopératives, Microfinance, Agri – élevage Développement, Auto promotion :

Muhanga 29,300,000 29,300,000

International RRP+ Coordination des associations des

PVVVIH+ Gasabo 6,466,060 6,466,060

International RWANDA AVENIR Formation professionnelle Gasabo 27,126,775 27,126,775


113



International RWANDA CHAMBER FOUNDATION

Promoting business Gasabo $420,000 249,900,000

International Search for Common Ground conflict resolution Gasabo $231,411 137,689,545

International SOCIAL & SCIENTIFIC SYSTEMS, INC

M&E Technical support Gasabo $1,361,830 810,288,850

International STORIES FOR HOPE RWANDA capacity building Gasabo $42,425 25,242,875

International The Nyanya Project Social, Women empowerment Gasabo $115,270 68,585,650

International ANEW BEGINNING RWANDA Completion of community centre building

Nyagatare 75,897,000 75,897,000

International FONDATION DiDé Encadrement des mineurs incarcérés dans le Centre Correctionnel de nyagatare

Nyagatare 248,167,110 248,167,110

International AVOCATS SANS FRONTIERES:ASF

Training Gasabo $116,487 95,402,853

International Bridge2 Rwanda ICT Gasabo $29,460 17,528,700

International DEVELOPMENT ALTERNATIVES INC

Private Sector/ Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke

$29,525 17,567,577

International EDUCATION DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC

Employment Nyarugenge, Kicukiro, Gasabo $998,730 594,244,055

International INTERNATIONAL RESOURCES GROUP LT

Private Sector/ Environment Karongi, Nyaruguru, Nyamagabe, Rusizi, Nyamasheke

100,719 59,927,537

International NEVER AGAIN PROJECT Employment Musanze, Kicukiro, Gasabo, Kayonza

104,647 62,265,019

International AGHR Assistance sociale Ruhango 11,546,000 11,546,000

International COMPASSION EAR NYAMAGANA Assistance sociale et Evangelisation

Ruhango 29,769,400 29,769,400


114



International COMPASSION BYIMANA Assistance sociale Ruhango 13,850,490 13,850,490

International UCF Assistance sociale Ruhango 2,721,000 2,721,000

International CARE INTERNATIONALE Santé et économique Ruhango 4,966,700 4,966,700

International AEE Assistance sociale et Evangelisation Ruhango 4,454,100 4,454,100

International HOPE FOUNDATION Assistance sociale Ruhango 246,320,000 246,320,000

International FEMMES DEVELOPPEMENT Developpement Ruhango 54,500,000 54,500,000

International UGAMA CSC Support cooperatives Ruhango 99,372,504 99,372,504

International CARITAS Education, santé, agriculture et elevage

Ruhango $52,878 43,307,082

International FH/RWANDA Education et developpement economique

Ruhango 17,815,920 17,815,920

International AVODI Encadrement des enfants orphelin Ruhango 12,000,000 12,000,000

International FTA Developpement Ruhango $15,000 12,285,000

International AVSI Assistance sociale Ruhango 126,817,900 126,817,900

International CARE Inernational SAFI Nyagatare, Gatsibo, Kayonza, Rwamagana, Kirehe, Bugesera

$147,308 87,648,260

International CARE Inernational ISARO Ruhango, Nyanza, Gisagara,

Huye, Nyamagabe & Nyaruguru

$102,719 61,117,805

International CARE Inernational NISU All districts $35,945 21,387,275

International CARE Inernational COSMO Musanze, Kamonyi & Muhanga districts while

$201,170 119,696,150

Total RFW 40,418,860,424

Local Poverty Reduction, Education and Family Empowerment in Rwanda (PREFER)

Poverty reduction, social welfare (distribution of 100 goats to vulnerable families, sewing lesson to 3 women, making soap, mutuelle

Musanze district 3,950,000 3,950,000


115



payment.

Local Africa Transformation Network Community empowerment(train Vulnerable Women in sewing, sports activities and leadership training workshop, completion of small community projects

Kicukiro 9,200,000 9,200,000


social welfare ( Visiting survivors at school, helping those without homes

Kicukiro 6,171,473,754 6,171,473,754

Local MTN Foundation social welfare National 33,000,000 33,000,000


Social protection Nyarugenge 31,800,000 31,800,000

Local Friends of Handicap in Rwanda Social Welfare ( sewing Machines for disabled people


Local Life World Mission Frontier improve standard of living of vulnerable people

Kigali City 7,000,000 7,000,000


Social Welfare( street kids CARE and training)

Kigali City 2,500,000 2,500,000

Local Center for Adduction and Psychosocial Orientation

Social welfare ( creation of anti drug abuse clubs, training of trainers, prison guards and students on drug types, physical and Health problems linked to the abused, counselling, GBV especially in schools.

Kigali city, Northern province and eastern province

47,836,400 47,836,000

Local Inades Formation Rwanda Gender Bugesera 24,076,820 24,076,820

Local Safer Rwanda Awareness raising on Illicit SALW Musanze, Kamonyi, Gicumbi, Bugesera, Kayonza

18,800,000 18,800,000

Local Centre Marembo Social Welfare (Provide food, Gasabo 26,577,935 26,577,935


116



accommodation, school fees, uniform, materials, counselling, security, clothing.)

Local Association Ihorere Munyarwanda

social economic development ( Support to cooperatives of sex workers

All districts of Sothern Province 52,000,000 52,000,000

Local Nsanga Gender Promotion sensitization and training, Good Governance, Unity and reconciliation

Hure District 122,184,000 122,184,000

Local Christian People for Humanitarian Action (CPHA)

Social Economic welfare (form cooperatives, training of members, development income generating projects

Kicukiro and Musanze Districts 27,000,000 27,000,000

Local Rwanda Link Social Welfare (Orthopaedic Material) MVK 11,205,000 11,205,000

Local MULINDI JAPAN ONE LOVE Social Welfare (Orthopaedic Material) MVK $15,000 8,925,000

Local The Streets Ahead Children's Centre Association

Social Welfare (provide food, medical, water, care clothing, integration of older youth,

Kayonza 37,671,588 37,671,588

Local ASSIST Rwanda Cottage Industry (reinforcement of ASSIST Cottage Industries including Tailoring, Knitting, Soap, candle, Shoe polish and craft Production

Nyagatare, Bugesera, 30,360,000 30,360,000

Local BENIMPUHWE social welfare (capacity building of Urban and rural school dropouts, education of vulnerable children

Gisagara 22,000,000 22,000,000

Local Youth Generation with a Vision

Social wellbeing Gasabo 150,000 150,000

Local Under AgeChristian Mission Social welfare protection renting places for baby care takers, recruiting

Rubavu 100,500,000 100,500,000


117



caretakers, training child mothers, community campaigns on child protection, empowering child mothers financially

Local Better Life (BLAO) Achievement Organisation

Social welfare(wielding and carpentry and English for vulnerable people)

Gasabo 2,400,000 2, 400,000

Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Pour Le Developpemnt Rural

Gender All districts 34,580,000 34,580,000

Local Duterimbere Social welfare (integrating handicapped and HIV+ positive people in the community.)

Nyagatare, Muhanga, Gatsibo and Nyarugenge

25,000,000 25,000,000

Local Association Genrale des Handcapes du Rwanda

Economic welfare (Vocational training for people with disability, school fees for young PWD providing financial assistance to cooperatives of PWD.

Kicukiro, Huye and Musanze 77,750,000 77,750,000

Local Love and Hope- Bugingo Economic devt (community development by transforming PVVIH associations into cooperatives and training.

Kayonza district 2,864,385 2,864,385

Local Inter-church Youth Foundation Development ( sewing and selling of clothes)

Kicukiro District 6,650,000 6,650,000

Local Kigali Hope Association social welfare ( creation of cooperatives

Nyarugenge 2,000,000 2,000,000

Local Association Abizerana Social Welfare ( assistance to students, to the sick

Kigali 1,021,000 1,021,000

Local Association Pour (APTM) la Promotion des Travaux Ménager

social welfare (sewing training, child labour fight

Musanze 3,730,000 3,730,000

Local Famille Maintenant social welfare (counselling of HIV + Nyarugenge and Kanombe 300,000 300,000


118



People

Local Association Non Crime-Rwanda

Gender ( fight against Gender Based Violence)

Burera and Kayonza 21,642,120 21,642,120

Local National Organisation of User and Survivals of Psychiatry

Social Economic (Basket weaving, Chicken Layering and Agriculture)

Kicukiro and Kayonza and Nyagatare districts

26,167,900 26,167,900

Local Association Mwenemuntu social welfare (supply of scholastic materials, follow up of students, training of bicycle repair, distribution of bicycle to opinion leaders

Huye, Ngoma 15,576,254 15,576,254

Local TABARA social &Economic welfare ( Cultivation of Pineapple)

Burera 1,000,000 1,000,000

Local Rock Fellowship Ministries( R.F.M)

Social Welfare( giving food, cloth to Orphans, giving goats, pigs chicken to families, training them in business

Gatsibo 7,700,000 7,700,000

Local Association National de Soutien aux Personnes vivant avec le VIH/SIDA (ANSP+)

Trade (Income Generating Activities) Gasabo 7,890,000 7,890,000

Local ASPIRE Social welfare(sensitization on dander of alcoholism, Handling domestic violence

Gasabo 2,700,000 2,700,000

Local Voice of Community Organisation

Gender and Human rights (Training local leaders on GBV

Kicukiro District 900,000 900,000

Local Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)

Social Welfare ( AIDS prevention, care and counselling), TB and Malaria social Mobilisation & gender promotion

Nyamagabe, Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro Nyagatare, Rusizi

132,503,000 132,503,000

Local Hope Foundation Social welfare( support to the elderly Ruhango 20,000,000 20,000,000

Local GREAT LAKES CENTER FOR CULTURE, PEACE AND DEVELOPMENT (GLCPD)

Poverty Reduction Nyaruguru $43,250 25,733,750


119



Local Abajambo Social Protection (OVC, old age) Rwamagana, Bugesera, Gasabo 53,500,000 53,500,000

Local Association Pour la Promotion des Initiative de base (APIB)

Capacity Building for Poverty Reduction

Gakenye 27,165,122 27,165,122

Local SERUKA asbl Poverty Reduction Gasabo, Nyarugenge, Bugesera, Muhanga

50,247,000 50,247,000

Local ASSOCIATION DE RECHERECHE ET D'APPUI AUX MOUVEMENTS ASSOCIATIFS (ARAMA)

Gender and Family Promotion (GBV) Ngoma 164,801 134,972,019

Local Grain de Seneve (GDS) Social Portection: Family care for Children and their education

Musanze 30,905,275 30,905,275

Local Action Nord-Sud Rwanda Micro Credit Finance Burera 33,000,000 33,000,000

Local JYA MU BANDI MWANA Social Protection Gasabo, Rulindo, Nyarugenge, Kicukiro

1,000,000 1,000,000

Local Institution d'Appui aux Agri-Eleveurs de Busasamana (I.A.BU asbl)

Social Protection Rubavu, Nyabihu 5,050,000 5,050,000

Local Pilgrim Center for Healing and Reconciliation Minitries

Social Protection Kicukiro, Kamonyi, Nyagatare 24,200 14,399,000


Social Protection (OVC) Nyaruguru 3,000,000 3,000,000

Local Caritas-RWANDA Social Protection Huye, Ngoma, Rubavu, Kigali Ville, Musanze, Karongi, Rutsiro, Gicumbi, Rusizi, Huye, Muhanga, Ruhango, Nyamagabe

500,838,464 500,838,464

Local Congregation des Soeurs Abizaramariya

Poverty Reduction and Income Generation

Huye, Gisagara 167,954,432 167,954,432

Local Association des Veuves du Social Protection Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, 300,863,410 300,863,410


120



Genocide Agahozo (AVEGA) Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rusizi, Nyamasheke

Local Association pour le Bien etre Social (A.B.E.S)

Social Protection: HIV, Food security, capacity

Musanze, Rulindo 27,718,520 27,718,520


Social Protection Musanze, Gasabo 13,503,500 13,503,500


Capacity Building: Orphans and Child rights, Community development, Poverty Reduction

Rwamagana, Muhanga, Huye, Nyamagabe, Rubavu, Gatsibo, Bugesera

630,226,907 630,226,907

Local CONGREGATION DE LA MISSION-PERES LAZARISTES

Street Children Muhanga 2,000,000 2,000,000

Local ACTION FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

Gender sensitisation Kicukiro 8,000,000 8,000,000

Local AHLUL BAIT ISLAMIC FOUNDATION

Credit Financing, capacity building Gasabo 1,200,000 1,200,000

Local Urunana/Triat d'Union Social Protection Nyarugenge, Gasabo, Muhanga, Kamonyi, Kicukiro, Rwamagana, Kayonza, Bugesera, Gisagara, Gatsibo, Ngoma, Huye

138,659,910 138,659,910

Local Concern and Care for the Needy in Rwanda

Social Protection Rubavu, Rutsiro, Karongi, Nyamasheke, Rusizi, Muhanga, Kamonyi

16,000,000 16,000,000

Local Action Pour le Developpement Rural Integre(DUHAMIC-ADRI)

Social Protection (OVC, access to services)

Muhanga, Rulindo, Ruhango 186,003,540 186,003,540

Local BAMPOREZE Social Protection: Capacity Building of OVC

Rulindo 42,201,400 42,201,400

Local Solace Ministries Social Protection: Orphan care, shelter homeless and fight poverty

Kigali Ville, Bugesera, Nyamagabe, Kamonyi,

329,400,000 329,400,000


121



Rwamagana, Nyanza, Huye,


Income generating all districts 14,800,000 14,800,000


Economic Devt( Bicycle Credit, Women Training)

Bugesera 7,500,000 7,500,000


Social economic (Chicken project, hand craft, T-shirt printing, Soap Making

Kayonza 2,441,100 2,441,100


Administration & Operations Kayonza 47,644,500 47,644,500

Local Benishyaka Economic Empowerment (Basket weaving for widows training

Kirehe District 5,080,000 5,080,000

Local Benishyaka Administration (institutional strengthening and operational capacity

Nyagatare and Kigali City 44,342,574 44,342,574


Economic Development (forming self help, associations, financing youth with projects, training


84,325,901 84,325,901


Good governance (contribution in African child day, omens day, provide financial support to OVC, Support exchange visits, support OVC forums at District level.


13,750,000 13,750,000

Local Youth Generation with a Vision Economic devt (Preparation, implementation and monitoring and evaluation of project (taxi moto & public secretariat)

Gasabo 11,491,540 11,491,540

Local Reseau Des Femmes Oeuvrant Economic empowerment of women Northern Province 380,300,000 380,300,000


122



Pour Le Developpemnt Rural


Institutional devt National level 19,984,000 19,984,000

Local Duterimbere Capacity Building(training and sensitization & study tours of women entrepreneurs, pineapple and mushroom value chain, mushroom

Nyagatare, Muhanga, Kirehe, Kigali city, Gisagara and Gasabo.

166,112,775 166,112,775

Local Soeur Inshuti z'Abakene Good governance (fighting corruption using umucyo radio trade fair outreach)

expo grounds, using umucyo radio

34,896,740 34,896,740

Local Rural Environment and Development Organisation

Economic Development (continue with the activities of the 3 yr project, facilitate 35 people representing cooperatives for study tours, sensitizing Vulnerable groups

Musanze, Burera, Rutsiro 41,982,184 41,982,184

Local ASPIRE Economic Development (conduct training on cooperative formation and mgt, book keeping, accounts and marketing,

Gasabo 4,000,000 4,000,000

Local ASSIST Rwanda Cottage Industry (reinforcement of ASSIST Cottage Industries)

Nyagatare, Bugesera, 30,360,000 30,360,000

Local Rwanda Development Solutions (RDS)

Capacity Building in cooperatives and Associations

Rulindo and Nyabihu District 39,674,000 39,674,000

Local Cooperate Out of Poverty (Coop-Rwanda)

Economic Development (capacity building of Ex combatants in entrepreneurship &ICT, Customer care, marketing, accounts. Micro finance development

10 district from Kigali city $313,583 180,937,391

Local Association des Travailleurs Capacity Building: Domestic and Hotel Kigali Ville 1,018,000 1,018,000


123



Domestique au Rwanda (TRADORWA)

Workers

Local African Evangelistic Enterprise Developpement Socio-économique des groupement des Femmes et enfants, evangelisation

Muhanga 43,805,069 43,805,069

Local Ahl-ul bayt Islamic Foundation: ABIF

Affaires sociales Gasabo 40,890,000 40,890,000

Local African Evangelistic Enterprise Rwanda

Prise en charge aux PVV à domicile ,OVC&IEC/CCC

Gasabo 65,715,725 65,715,725

Local Action Sociale Educative pour le développement communautaire (ASEDC)

Assistance aux OVCs Gasabo 12,626,592 12,626,592

Local Association pour la promotion des vulnérables: APV

OVCs Gasabo 87,630,000 87,630,000

Local As we forgive-Rwanda initiative

Reconciliation Gasabo $150,000 89,250,000

Local INTERNATIONAL JUSTICE MISSION: IJM

Legal Aid Gasabo 420,735,060 420,735,060

Local ISHAMI ADVOCACY FOR CHILDREN

OVC Gasabo $7,403,320 4,404,975,400

Local Kacyiru twakora Iki Social, Education Gasabo 14,170,500 14,170,500

Local KIGALI SHARKS RUGBY FOOTBALL CLUB

Rugby, Empower the youth, peace Gasabo 1,666,500 1,666,500

Local WORLD LEARNING Unity & reconciliation Gasabo $130,000 77,350,000

Local WORLD VISION Poverty reduction Gasabo $418,662 249,103,890

Local E3 partners Ministry G'irinka mu Nyarwanda Kayonza $2,800 1,666,000

Local BARAKABAHO Foundation OVC Kayonza $415,765 247,380,175

Local Conseil protestant du Rwanda Social counselling Kayonza 8,000,000 8,000,000


124



Local Croix Rouge Rwandaise Food security; environment; social protection

Kayonza 47,287,545 47,287,545

Local SACCA The streets Ahead Protection, Reintegration - Street children

Kayonza 102,000,000 102,000,000

Local CREDI Amahugurwa Iterambere ry'icyaro Kayonza 53,000,000 53,000,000

Local ARCT RUHUKA YOUTH PSYCHOSOCIAL (TRAUMA, UNITY &RECONCILIATION)

Kayonza 14,524,000 14,524,000

Local NCA Mosaic fondation Kayonza 4,425,000 4,425,000

Local DUTERIMBERE Local Economic development (Women empowerment )

Nyagatare $1,258 748,510

Local IMPAKOMU Cooperative Ruhango 41,345,300 41,345,300

Local CARE LIFE ASSOCIATION Assistance sociale et Evangelisation Ruhango $1,000,000 595,000,000

Local EPR RUHANGO Education et evangelisation Ruhango 70,000,000 70,000,000


Documents

FINAL REPORT CIVIL SOCIETY MAPPING (UNDP … · 2015-04-19 · Rwanda Civil Society Mapping – Final Report i . FINAL REPORT CIVIL SOCIETY MAPPING (UNDP RWANDA). (RFP-58951-2010-017)