44
FINAL REPORT 16th Edition ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law ELSA International 2017/2018

Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

FINAL REPORT 16th Edition ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law

ELSA International 2017/2018

Page 2: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Foreword

Dear Reader,

I hereby present to you the Final Report concluding the 16th edition of the ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law (EMC2).

The ELSA Moot Court Competition is the biggest, the most laborious and the most rewarding project that I have ever organized. It has been an incredible journey. I travelled across the whole world attending the Regional Rounds in Italy, Poland, the United States, Thailand and Kenya. The people are the ones who create this Competition and are collectively its biggest asset. You can see the same people being involved in this project year after year, giving back to the Competition their whole heart.

This year, EMC2 gathered together more than 380 students from 32 different countries, representing 99 universities. Without any doubt, the best part of the EMC2 is to see the evolution of the participants, from the first pleading of the Regional Rounds to the Grand Final pleading during the final stage in Geneva.

The Competition will always have a winner; however, it is not about winning, but being brave enough to compete. Therefore, I would like to once again congratulate all the teams for being so brave and dedicated – you are all winners. Every year we see teams without any trade law background reach the final stage of the Competition because of their passionate motivation and determination. Along the way, not only do they gain a legal knowledge, but also so many necessary skills which they can use – no matter which path they choose in their lives. For all their hard work, this project gives back to the participants a valuable experience and a host of skills.

After 16 years, the ELSA Moot Court Competition Final Oral Round (FOR) has become a week of celebration within the trade law community. During the Grand Final, there was a full house in the famous room W of the WTO. I could not imagine a more rewarding moment for the Head of the Organization of this Competition than seeing a full house of leading trade law experts, who all came to see students competing against each other at a level similar to what might be seen in an actual WTO dispute. And they came because they know that these students are the future.

It was an honour to dedicate one year of my work and life to the organization of the 16th edition of the ELSA Moot Court Competition.

Thank you all for being a part of this incredible journey.

Michelle Goossens

Vice President for ELSA Moot Court Competitions 2017/2018

ELSA International

Page 3: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

1. Background, structure and timeline

1.1 About ELSA

The European Law Students’ Association (ELSA), founded on 4 May 1981 is an international, independent, non-political and non-profit-making organization, run by and for law students and young lawyers. After 35 years of existence, it is the world’s largest independent law students’ association with more than 54.000 members in 44 countries. To read more about ELSA’s activities visit http://elsa.org.

1.2 The ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO law

1.2.1 General

The ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law (EMC2) is a simulated hearing of the World Trade Organization dispute settlement system. Participants from around the world send in written submissions, for the complainant and respondent, in a fictitious case. After sending their submissions, all the teams are given the opportunity to present oral arguments in front of panels which consist of WTO and trade law experts. Winning teams from five Regional Rounds (two European Rounds; an Asia-Pacific Round; an All-American Round; and an African Round) compete against each other in the Final Oral Round (FOR) held in Geneva, Switzerland at the WTO headquarters. Over its course, the ELSA Moot Court Competition developed from being a European competition for our Members to a global challenge that gathers students from all around the world every year, with 5 Regional Rounds organized across the globe. During the past 16 years, the ELSA Moot Court Competition has been contributing to the legal education of law students and young lawyers as well as helping ELSA to achieve its vision and purpose.

1.2.2 Structure

The ELSA Moot Court consists of two phases. Firstly, the teams have to deliver Written Submissions on the issued Case for both the Complainant and the Respondent. Secondly, the teams have to participate in one of the allocated Regional Rounds: ELSA Member States, Asia-Pacific, All America, Africa or the International Written Round. The best teams of each Regional Round (the number depending on the amount of participating teams) qualify for the FOR. In the FOR, these teams then have to plead representing both sides in turn during the Preliminary Rounds. The

Page 4: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

best eight teams are admitted from the Preliminary Rounds to participate in the Quarter-Finals. The best four teams qualify for the Semi-Finals. Finally, the best two teams plead against each other in the Grand Final.

1.2.3 The 16th edition

The Moot Court problem of the 16th edition was written by Dr. James Nedumpara, Professor & Head, Centre for Trade and Investment Law, Indian Institute of Foreign Trade.

On 15 September 2017, the Case was published and the 16th edition was officially launched. One team per university could register two to four team members until November 2017.

These teams were allowed to send in a maximum of five clarification questions to the Case Author until 15 November 2017. In total, 113 teams had registered by the registration deadline. Before January 2017, teams had to then send in the Written Submissions.

From the end of February, throughout March, to the beginning of April, the Regional Rounds took place worldwide: 99 teams from 32 countries took part in this stage of the Competition. The first round was the European Round in Naples, Italy, organised by ELSA Napoli, followed by the second European Round, organised by ELSA Wroclaw in Poland. The All-American Round was then organised by American University Washington College of Law in Washington D.C., the United States. The Asia-Pacific Regional Round was organised by the Asian Law Students’ Association, namely their chapter in Thailand, having held the round in Bangkok. Fially, the African Round was organised by Strathmore University in Nairobi, Kenya.

All the teams participating in the Regional Rounds showed their devotion, motivation and hard work, which resulted in their outstanding performances.

1.2.4 The Scoring System

The Oral Pleadings were assessed as follows:

(1) Regional Rounds In the Preliminary Rounds, three Panellists sat in each pleading. The Semi-Finals had three to five Panellists and the Grand Final had five to seven panellists. The Panel had to issue overall points for each team as well as for each orator individually.

(2) Final Oral Round In the Preliminary Rounds, three Panellists sat in each pleading. The Quarter-Finals had four Panellists, the Semi-Finals had six Panellists and the Grand Final had nine Panellists. The Panel had to issue overall points for each team as well as for each orator individually.

For the Preliminary Rounds, the scores were calculated as follows: 70% Oral Pleading scores and 30 % Written Submission scores. The Quarter-Finals, Semi-Finals and Grand Final only consisted of oral pleading scores. Each panellist could award up to a maximum of 50 points.

The case and all other important documents of the 16th edition can be found and downloaded on the new website: www.emc2.elsa.org.

Page 5: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

1.2.5 Sponsors

ELSA International would like to thank the EMC2 Institutional Partners and Sponsors for their cooperation throughout the 15th edition of the Competition:

(1) Technical Supporters The World Trade Organization and the Graduate Institute

(2) Platinum Sponsors King & Spalding and Van Bael and Bellis

(3) Gold Sponsors Hogan Lovells, Mayer Brown, Sidley Austin, Steptoe & Johnson and White & Case

(4) Academic Supporter

Georgetown University, IELPO/University of Barcelona and World Trade Institute

Page 6: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

2. First European Regional Round – Naples, Italy

2.1 Introduction

The first European Regional Round took place in Naples, Italy, organised by ELSA Napoli, from the 28th of February to the 4th of March 2018. The Head of the Organising Committee was Enrico Massa.

2.2 Panellists

- Aleksei Petrenko – doctoral candidate at the University of Göttingen - Amedeo Arena - Associate Professor of European Union Law at the University of

Naples "Federico II" School of Law - Andrea Circolo – doctoral candidate at the University of Naples - Claude Chase – International Trade Manager at Japan Tobacco International - Giannicola Forte – Studio Legale Lauro - Jan Yves Remy – Sidley Austin - Juan Pablo Moya Hoyos – World Trade Organisation - Lorenzo Gradoni – Max Planck Institute Luxembourg - Maria Alcover – ACWL - Marta Soprana – WTI Alumna Representative - Nataliia Kozachuk – IELPO LLM Representative - Rambod Behboodi – King and Spalding - Sandeep Ravikumar – Allen & Overy - Sidonie Deeschemaeker – Van Bael & Bellis

2.3 Participating Universities

- Team 003 – University of Zürich, Switzerland - Team 020 – KU Leuven, Belgium - Team 023 – Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey - Team 042 - National University of "Kyiv-Mohyla Academy" of Ukraine, Ukraine - Team 052 – University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands - Team 053 – University of Bern, Switzerland - Team 054 - Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany - Team 059 – Paris 1 Pantheon la Sorbonne, France - Team 062 – London School of Economics, United Kingdom - Team 067 – University of Georgia, Georgia - Team 071 – Institute of International Relations, Ukraine - Team 075 – Leiden University, the Netherlands - Team 076 - National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Russia - Team 084 – Sciences Po Paris, France - Team 095 – University of Edinburgh, the United Kingdom

Page 7: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

2.4 Preliminary Round Scores

The scores of the preliminary rounds are calculated as follows: 30 % Written Submission Scores and 70 % Oral Pleading Scores. The Written Submissions were assessed by Panelists, and the overall scores are the sums of these scores, minus the penalty points according to the rules. The Oral Pleadings were assessed by 3 Panelists each and thus, 3 scores were given.

2.5 Semi-Final Scores

2.6 Grand Final Scores

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 2Judge 3 Average OP Total

3 32 23 30 28 34 29 34 29,66666667 30,3666720 39,5 46 46 48 45 44 43 45,33333333 43,5833323 40 28 38 38 25 43 41 35,5 36,887542 39 27 27 27 38 44 43,5 34,41666667 35,8291752 37 48 48 50 45 47 44 47 4453 21,5 34 40 36 42 42 43 39,5 34,154 27 27 32 36 25 44 44 34,66666667 32,3666759 36 20 26 12 29 30 31 24,66666667 28,0666762 28 34 41 42 38 35 38 38 35,037567 28,5 26 24 24 15 18 20 21,16666667 23,3666771 32 20 14 25 23 16 22 20 23,562575 40 24 25 25 23 23 24 24 28,912576 39,25 37 38 38 42,5 44 41 40,08333333 39,8333384 25,75 25 33 25 22 30 15 25 25,22595 35,75 27 26 26 31 34 34 29,66666667 31,49167

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total52 40 42 40 40 39 20123 41 41 42 41 41 206

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total20 40 40 40 40 40 20076 24 26 22 24 21 117

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Total23 45 45 45 45 45 40 45 31020 40 45 40 40 40 40 40 285

Final

Page 8: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

2.7 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalKehinde Ibrahim 52 46 46 46 47 44 45 274Tom Hick 20 47 46 46 43 45 44 271Aline Fadié 52 46 46 46 45 42 43 268Manda Wilson 20 47 47 47 41 41 36 259Meeri Aurora Toivanen 62 40 43 41 42 42 42 250Anna Sablicova 52 43 43 43 44 43 32 248Viktoriia Levchenko 76 39 38 37 42 45 43 244Mustafa Bilgin 23 40 40 40 20 43 41 224Nomfundo Mkatshwa 53 19 31 38 43 43 46 220Konstantin Pashuto 76 34 39 38 38 31 39 219Jhans Armando Panihuara Aragón 53 26 40 41 26 41 42 216Anastasiia Hrebeniuk 42 28 28 28 40 45 44 213Kateryna Lazarchuk 42 28 28 28 41 41 41 207Veena Manikulam 3 24 30 30 42 23 45 194Ruggero Chicco 62 36 40 40 24 22 24 186Laurianne Junod 53 16 34 26 32 36 36 180Ana Obando 59 18 31 21 36 33 38 177Dinara Soorbekova 75 31 30 30 28 28 28 175Ugur Can Hekim 95 28 28 28 29 32 30 175Diane Cosson 84 28 33 23 27 32 30 173Hiroki Yamada 95 28 28 25 22 32 30 165Bengusu Guvendi 23 18 18 18 27 42 39 162Krzysztof Adam Górski 3 19 30 28 32 21 30 160Dragos Barbu 95 25 26 22 23 32 30 158Guihong Bao 75 30 25 28 24 24 25 156Ingrid Vieira Souza 67 28 31 31 15 20 24 149Yagmur Kaya 23 16 16 16 18 41 38 145Sophie Peter 84 27 31 19 24 30 14 145Clémentine Faivre 59 21 22 12 29 32 26 142Livia van Severen 20 44 45 42 131Greta Jahn 54 36 46 47 129Lais Alvez 20 46 41 41 128Tika Mamadashvili 67 19 22 21 18 14 26 120SIYOU ZHOU 75 24 24 17 14 16 18 113Olena Mykhailova 71 16 20 19 10 17 26 108Sanja Matic 3 22 20 18 14 18 15 107Hana Rousse 62 36 36 35 107Laila Sentürk 54 27 40 39 106Tunc Savas 62 34 37 34 105Kateryna Nalyvaiko 42 36 31 33 100Felix Flaig 54 31 28 40 99Olha Krylova 71 14 22 21 11 13 10 91Sophiko Koroglishvili 67 14 18 18 14 12 14 90Emma Potapova 71 30 23 31 84Katarzyna Staszkiewicz 59 32 26 24 82Ilya Ulyanov 84 24 30 27 81Lisa Schrödter 54 19 20 31 70Anna Tutova 71 19 20 19 58Giulia Orso Giacone 59 17 22 11 50Aubin Becker 84 16 22 10 48Mykola Kolotylo 42 14 14 14 42Enya Beutler 3 0Kemal Unal 23 0Lilian Meinen 52 0Eduard Nuriev 76 0Liliya Baymuratova 76 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 9: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Semi-Finals

Grand Final

2.8 Awards

- Winner: Team 023, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey - Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Kehinde Ibrahim - Best Orator Semi-finals: Manda Wilson - Best Orator Grand Final: Bengusu Guvendi - Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 023, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey - Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 023, Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey - Best Written Submission Overall: Team 075, Leiden University, the Netherlands

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 TotalManda Wilson 20 43 43 42 43 43 214Bengusu Guvendi 23 40 41 42 43 40 206Anna Sablicova 52 38 37 40 40 44 199Tom Hick 20 39 42 39 37 39 196Aline Fadié 52 38 44 33 41 40 196Yagmur Kaya 23 41 37 41 39 37 195Kehinde Ibrahim 52 43 38 33 38 37 189Mustafa Bilgin 23 30 35 40 41 38 184Lais Alvez 20 29 35 34 34 34 166Viktoriia Levchenko 76 28 28 27 27 24 134Konstantin Pashuto 76 28 25 26 27 24 130Livia van Severen 20 0Kemal Unal 23 0Lilian Meinen 52 0Eduard Nuriev 76 0Liliya Baymuratova 76 0

Semi Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 TotalBengusu Guvendi 23 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 315Manda Wilson 20 43 43 42 44 43 37 39 291Yagmur Kaya 23 40 40 40 41 40 40 39 280Mustafa Bilgin 23 34 41 38 39 38 40 44 274Livia van Severen 20 38 42 38 41 39 33 42 273Tom Hick 20 21 42 40 41 39 41 41 265Lais Alvez 20 0Kemal Unal 23 0

Final

Page 10: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

3. Second European Regional Round Wroclaw, Poland

3.1 Introduction

The second European Regional Round took place in Wroclaw, Poland, organised by ELSA Wroclaw, from 6 to 10 March 2018. The Head of the Organising Committee was Kamil Baran.

3.2 Panellists

• Akhil Raina – Marie-Curie Fellow at Leuven Centre for Global Governance Studies, KU Leuven

• Aleksei Petrenko – doctoral candidate University of Göttingen • Alexander Huitzi Alfonso – IELPO Alumnus Representative • Anna Gladshtein – Lecturer International Trade at the Institute of International Relations

of Kyiv Natioanl Taras Shevchenko University • Clotilde du Parc – Van Bael & Bellis • Dylan Geraets – Mayer Brown • Kiliane Huyghebaert – VVGB Avocats • Krzysztof Trepczyński – Minister of the Ministry of Development, specializing in WTO

Law • Manuel Sanchez – King and Spalding • Miguel Burnier da Silveira – World Trade Organisation • Riika Kuoppmäki – Akin Gump • Sergey Lakhno – Counsel at Integrites • Tomer Broude - Sylvan M. Cohen Chair in Law, Faculty of Law and Department of

International Relations, Academic Director, Minerva Center for Human Rights, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

• Yury Rovnov – WTI Alumnus Representative

3.3 Participating Universities

- Team 006 – University of Southern Denmark, Denmark - Team 010 - Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster, Germany - Team 013 - Università degli studi di Napoli Federico II, Italy - Team 022 - Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Ukraine - Team 027 – National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece - Team 035 - Fundación Esade, Spain - Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands - Team 043 – University of Lucerne, Switzerland - Team 046 – University of Geneva, Switzerland - Team 056 – Democritus University of Thrace, Greece - Team 061 – Graduate Institute of International Developmental Studies, Switzerland - Team 068 – Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Greece - Team 070 - Allameh Tabataba'i University and Shahid Beheshti University - Team 096 – Bilkent University, Turkey

Page 11: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Team 103 – University of Helsinki, Finland - Team 107 – King’s College London, United Kingdom

3.4 Preliminary Round Scores

The scores of the preliminary rounds are calculated as follows: 30 % Written Submission Scores and 70 % Oral Pleading Scores. The Written Submissions were assessed by Panelists, and the overall scores are the sums of these scores, minus the penalty points according to the rules. The Oral Pleadings were assessed by 3 Panelists each and thus, 3 scores were given.

3.5 Semi-Final Scores

3.6 Grand Final Scores

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 3Judge 3 Average OP Total

6 31 24 32 20 32 40 37 30,83333333 30,8833310 39,5 22 32 30 36 40 40 33,33333333 35,1833313 22,75 21 27 22 21 30 25 24,33333333 23,8583322 43,5 19 22 29 39 35 37 30,16666667 34,1666727 33,75 29 28 32 48 40 49 37,66666667 36,4916732 15,75 27 26 19 12 13 17 19 18,02535 34,5 18 33 27 18 16 14 21 25,0537 47 47 46 43 43 46 42 44,5 45,2543 40,5 40 44 40 47 40 42 42,16666667 41,6666746 35,75 30 27 24 23 20 25 24,83333333 28,1083356 25,5 16 18 21 37 37 33 27 26,5561 37,75 43 44 43 43 44 50 44,5 42,47568 22 16 29 13 22 29 23 22 2270 29,75 21 18 20 23 20 29 21,83333333 24,2083396 31,5 30 32 19 27 19 23 25 26,95

103 32 14 17 21 37 28 34 25,16666667 27,21667107 35 21 29 20 23 25 26 24 27,3

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total37 41 43 43 44 45 21627 34 38 36 40 37 185

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total61 45 45 47 44 45 22643 41 36 27 40 32 176

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 Total37 48 48 46 48 48 48 46 48 48 42861 47 47 48 47 47 47 45 47 46 421

Final

Page 12: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

3.7 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalElli Zachari 37 50 47 47 37 44 43 268Argyrios Papaefthymiou 61 43 43 42 44 43 50 265Eva Diener 43 43 43 44 48 41 41 260Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 34 43 45 41 37 49 249Vnessaa Oesch 43 34 45 38 46 40 41 244Sara Angeleska 61 41 30 31 42 41 47 232Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 36 40 36 42 37 40 231Eleni-Amalia Giannakopoulou 27 29 26 36 47 42 50 230Antonia Mathioudaki 27 27 30 35 47 41 50 230Luisa Sophie Maria Schwegler 43 31 37 36 46 38 41 229Matthes Kohmüller 10 22 34 30 36 42 38 202Paul Schwarz 10 22 30 24 39 45 41 201Jonas Sebastian Andersen 6 28 35 26 32 40 39 200Milena Plocki 10 22 29 30 37 40 40 198Mathias Illum Juhl Jensen 6 24 33 22 40 41 37 197Aghasi Javid Mazyar 70 27 29 27 41 22 46 192Hanna Holubnycha 22 16 14 34 47 39 39 189Andrii Falendysh 22 24 24 36 32 32 36 184Isabelle Wenger 107 31 34 26 30 25 30 176Stefania Patuto 32 45 35 26 17 26 25 174Marilyn Sturny 46 29 30 30 30 21 29 169Anja Bondrup Grunth Hansen 6 23 23 21 32 39 30 168Evangelia Mangina 56 16 22 16 39 37 38 168Ekrem Selcuk Kangal 96 27 34 20 26 20 31 158Siiri Heikkilä 103 17 17 14 43 28 34 153Mohamed Bouzagou Ouali 35 28 41 25 24 20 14 152Francesca Salvatore 13 23 28 22 20 30 25 148Dionysios Argyropoulos 56 14 15 16 33 34 31 143Christos-Nikolaos Kalykas 56 14 14 12 35 32 35 142Serhat Mert 96 30 32 20 21 20 18 141Hilali Özen 96 28 30 22 25 20 15 140Caroline Iris Hammacher 37 45 48 45 138Marie Delcourt 107 25 30 19 20 21 23 138Hervé N'Zita 46 23 26 18 24 18 25 134Florence Berten 37 47 43 41 131Terpisthea Papanikolaou 68 16 23 14 20 25 25 123Joan Ilobi 46 20 18 15 24 12 23 112Dimitra Athanasa 68 14 13 13 20 23 27 110Mitti Varajärvi 107 24 19 18 16 14 18 109Oleksandra Poliakova 22 38 31 37 106Beatriz Tapia Manen 35 25 22 15 16 16 12 106Aghasi Javid Maryam 70 11 12 13 23 16 29 104Dorothea Andrikaki 68 29 46 22 97Amy Catherine Xiao Mei King 32 23 16 10 11 10 12 82Hazeghi Aghdam Mohammadreza 70 12 12 10 13 13 22 82Anna Paola Liguoro 13 20 30 25 75Fotios Kokkinis 68 20 26 23 69Marilena Laudando 13 21 26 12 59Francesco Cotugno 13 20 25 11 56Oleksii Voloshyn 22 12 14 29 55Pilar linares Martinez 35 23 22 10 55Noelia Rodriguez Gomez 35 17 15 14 46Konstantina Chalantzouka 27 0Yannick Trudel 61 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 13: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Semi-Finals

Grand Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 TotalElli Zachari 37 47 47 48 48 47 237Argyrios Papaefthymiou 61 47 42 47 43 48 227Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 45 42 48 41 42 218Sara Angeleska 61 44 42 46 43 43 218Florence Berten 37 44 41 41 40 46 212Eleni-Amalia Giannakopoulou 27 36 41 40 32 45 194Eva Diener 43 45 38 27 40 34 184Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 39 34 36 32 39 180Vnessaa Oesch 43 42 39 26 40 33 180Antonia Mathioudaki 27 31 32 36 32 33 164Luisa Sophie Maria Schwegler 43 37 30 23 32 25 147Amy Catherine Xiao Mei King 32 0Stefania Patuto 32 0Mohamed Bouzagou Ouali 35 0Noelia Rodriguez Gomez 35 0Beatriz Tapia Manen 35 0Pilar linares Martinez 35 0Caroline Iris Hammacher 37 0Yannick Trudel 61 0

Semi final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 TotalArgyrios Papaefthymiou 61 49 48 48 47 48 44 48 43 44 419Elli Zachari 37 48 44 44 45 46 48 48 44 48 415Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 47 47 42 39 44 43 47 41 36 386Florence Berten 37 46 42 42 40 44 41 45 40 40 380Sara Angeleska 61 47 42 42 44 42 41 46 40 30 374Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 46 42 43 42 42 41 43 40 30 369Caroline Iris Hammacher 37 0Vnessaa Oesch 43 0Luisa Sophie Maria Schwegler 43 0Eva Diener 43 0Yannick Trudel 61 0

Final

Page 14: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

3.8 Awards

- Winner: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands - Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Elli Zachari - Best Orator Semi-finals: Elli Zachari - Best Orator Grand Final: Argyrios Papafthymiou - Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the

Netherlands Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands Best Written Submission Overall: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands

Page 15: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

4. All-American Regional Round – Washington D.C., the United States

4.1 Introduction

The All-American Regional Round took place in Washington D.C., the United States at American University Washington College of Law, from 21 – 25 March 2018. The head organisers were Padideh Ala’i and Jennifer Dabson, together with Savannah Maxwell.

4.2 Panellists

- Adrian Vasquez - Vazquez Tercero & Zepeda - Aluisio de Lima Campos – American University Washington College of Law - Amy Porges – Amelia Porges PLLC - Andrew Shoyer – Sidley Austin - Annelies Winborne - Deputy Assistant US Trade Representative for Monitoring and

Enforcement at Office of the United States Trade Representative - Beth Balzan - Congressional Staffer in the House Ways and Means Committee - Charles Roh – Trade expert, retired partner Weil, Gotshal & Manges - Daniel Brinza – Intellectual Property Law Office - Daniela Gomez Altamirano – World Bank - Ernesto Fernandez – International Trade Law Specialist - Gary Horlick – Law offices of Gary N. Horlick - Horacio Lopez-Portillo - Vazquez Tercero & Zepeda - Jared Wessel – Hogan Lovells - Jeffrey Frank – Wiley Rein LLP - Jennifer Hillman – Georgetown University - Jesse Krier – World Trade Organisation - Jonathan Zielinski – Cassidy Levy Kent - Judith Czako - Marisa Goldstein – World Trade Organisation - Martin Molinuevo – World Bank - Matthew Yeo – Steptoe & Johnson - Michael Jacobson – Hogan Lovells - Nettie Horne – Trade Law Specialist - Nicolas Torres - Trade Law Specialist - Pavan Krishnamurthy – Sidley Austin - Ravi Soopramanien – Hughes Hubbard & Reed - Ricardo Ramirez – Trade Law Specialist, former Appellate Body Member of the WTO - Ron Kendler – White and Case - Santiago Wills - Lewin & Wills - Sarah Schulman – Cassidy Levy Keny - Semira Nikou - WilemerHale - Simon Lester - Associate Director, Center for Trade Policy Studies, Cato Institute - Stephen Kho – Akin Gump - Thomas Beline – Cassidy Levy Kent

Page 16: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Tiffany Smith – Mayer Brown - William Ehlers - Secretary to the Council. Head of External Relations at Global

Environment Facility

4.3 Participating Universities

• Team 014 – University of Windsor, Canada • Team 024 – University of Ottowa, Canada • Team 025 - Direito FGV - São Paulo, Brazil • Team 028 - Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Guatemala • Team 031 – Georgetown University, the United States • Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia • Team 036 - Instituto Tecnológico Autónomo de México, Mexico • Team 038 - Universidad Externado de Colombia, Colombia • Team 039 – Queen’s University, Canada • Team 040 – Universidad de los Andes, Colombia • Team 045 – Harvard Law School, the United States • Team 050 - Escola De Direito De Brasília, Brazil • Team 060 - Pontifical Catholic University of Paraná, Brazil • Team 090 – American University Washington College of Law

4.4 Preliminary Round Scores

North America

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 2Judge 3 Average OP Total

14 37,75 27 29 32 32 31 32 30,5 32,67524 37,5 40 35 38 42 48 43 41 39,9531 37 35 38 41 44 46 48 42 40,539 30,25 34 40 39 37 37 30 36,16666667 34,3916745 29 44 40 42 41 44 48 43,16666667 38,9166790 14,5 26 23 23 23 25 22 23,66666667 20,91667

Page 17: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Latin America

4.5 Semi-Final Scores

North America

Latin America

4.6 Grand Final Scores

North America

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 2Judge 3 Average OP Total

25 39 42 44 46 35 35 36 39,66666667 39,4666728 44 34 30 30 45 43 43 37,5 39,4534 46 39 39 38 41 31 40 38 40,436 33 28 33 34 28 30 28 30,16666667 31,0166738 34,25 30 44 34 33 32 16 31,5 32,32540 27 28 31 25 26 40 35 30,83333333 29,6833350 32,25 19 29 29 27 25 26 25,83333333 27,7583360 30,75 41 40 41 28 28 27 34,16666667 33,14167

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total31 42 42 43 44 42 21339 48 43 44 46 43 224

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total24 36 43 40 34 39 19245 47 47 43 42 46 225

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total34 45 46 47 47 46 23160 45 45 45 44 42 221

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Total25 42 42 39 38 41 20228 46 43 44 46 46 225

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Total39 36 41 40 43 42 38 37 27745 42 41 45 43 45 43 43 302

Final

Page 18: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Latin America

4.7 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds North America

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Total34 43 48 42 47 41 44 44 30928 50 46 47 49 46 48 46 332

Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalZenia Memon 31 36 43 42 49 41 44 255Sara Romeih 24 44 43 43 40 43 41 254Kevin Gu 45 46 36 43 38 40 48 251Barbara Medrado 45 43 32 41 41 40 48 245Samantha Black 39 39 41 44 40 41 36 241Ariane Yvon 31 34 40 42 47 32 44 239Savvas Daginis 24 39 34 37 46 40 39 235Aaina Grover 14 34 34 35 32 33 34 202Laura Rowe 39 36 35 36 33 33 28 201Montana Yuen 14 27 28 32 25 44 30 186Adrienne Greenberg 90 33 32 38 25 31 26 185Grette Leon-Fernandez 90 19 26 36 21 27 22 151Shruti Joshi 14 29 18 28 28 22 22 147Brian Park 90 24 20 22 25 24 22 137Han Seul Yoon 45 42 42 48 132Mark Carew 24 43 45 39 127Yucai Yu 31 43 43 41 127Daniel Fong 24 42 41 42 125Ryan Manucha 45 43 36 39 118Vivian Hua 39 35 35 35 105Kanzanira Thorington 31 26 35 33 94Daniel Broadus 39 37 36 20 93

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 19: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Preliminary Rounds Latin America

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalLaura Salazar 34 41 41 42 41 44 34 243Juan Hernandez 28 36 40 29 47 45 42 239Vitor Emmanuel dos Snatos Abreu 25 38 42 46 35 32 35 228Pablo Andrés Aponte González 38 41 33 45 42 39 20 220Bruna Prado de Carvalho 25 41 38 46 31 33 30 219Nathalia Sagastume 28 30 30 25 42 42 41 210Jorge Andrés Gómez 34 40 35 41 29 36 29 210Sofia Urrea Zuluaga 38 45 35 42 31 35 19 207Isabella Lorduy Ariza 40 31 30 28 30 41 44 204Maria Eduarda Jabur Helm 60 43 36 39 33 28 23 202Murilo Alves Brandão Quadros 60 41 36 38 32 26 23 196Thiago Barra de Souza 50 36 31 28 31 37 30 193Maria Gabriela Sandino De Luca 40 31 29 27 31 30 34 182Yvette Alexandra Seferian Dauguet 36 29 34 30 28 29 27 177Juan Diego Polo Salazar 38 39 29 41 26 25 12 172Andrés Hernández Barrera 36 28 33 35 21 23 23 163Giulia Galaxe 50 31 27 18 24 20 26 146Marina Magalhães Barreto 50 30 28 15 26 19 26 144Bruna Linhares ferrazzo 25 43 40 46 129GIULIA DE PAOLA 25 39 36 37 112Andres Marroquin 28 37 39 36 112Diego Gómez Charry 40 42 32 34 108Mylena Raisa Pombo Schultz 60 39 31 35 105Natalia Alarcón 34 38 32 33 103Juan Pablo Fernández López 40 33 32 38 103Tomás Jaramillo 34 26 39 28 93Juan Pablo Rodríguez Maza 36 32 29 32 93Bernardo Cantú Soriano 36 32 28 32 92Luis Arango 28 30 30 25 85Mariana Matias Ribeiro Ramos 60 28 21 26 75Juan Camilo González Fajardo 38 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 20: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Semi-Finals North America

Semi-Finals Latin America

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 TotalAriane Yvon 31 50 50 43 46 41 230Han Seul Yoon 45 47 47 43 42 44 223Laura Rowe 39 48 43 42 42 42 217Zenia Memon 31 48 41 41 40 41 211Samantha Black 39 42 40 41 47 41 211Vivian Hua 39 48 42 41 40 40 211Kevin Gu 45 44 44 43 40 35 206Yucai Yu 31 42 40 40 42 40 204Daniel Fong 24 44 44 43 35 34 200Barbara Medrado 45 40 41 40 36 29 186Savvas Daginis 24 41 40 40 31 22 174Sara Romeih 24 34 41 33 32 28 168Mark Carew 24 0Kanzanira Thorington 31 0Daniel Broadus 39 0Ryan Manucha 45 0

Semi Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 TotalMurilo Alves Brandão Quadros 60 46 48 49 46 45 234Juan Hernandez 28 44 45 46 48 42 225Jorge Andrés Gómez 34 44 43 48 45 39 219Nathalia Sagastume 28 44 40 41 47 46 218Laura Salazar 34 40 41 48 46 39 214Mylena Raisa Pombo Schultz 60 41 47 44 42 40 214Maria Eduarda Jabur Helm 60 42 44 43 44 40 213Natalia Alarcón 34 31 44 45 45 42 207Vitor Emmanuel dos Snatos Abreu 25 43 42 34 39 42 200Luis Arango 28 41 40 36 43 40 200Bruna Linhares ferrazzo 25 42 42 31 40 39 194Bruna Prado de Carvalho 25 40 41 30 38 36 185GIULIA DE PAOLA 25 0Andres Marroquin 28 0Tomás Jaramillo 34 0Mariana Matias Ribeiro Ramos 60 0

Semi Final

Page 21: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Grand Final North America

Grand Final Latin America

4.8 Awards

North America

- Winner: Team 045 – Harvard Law School, the United States - Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Zenia Memon - Best Orator Semi-finals: Ariane Yvon - Best Orator Grand Final: Kevin Gu - Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 014 - University of Windsor, Canada - Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 024, University of Ottowa, Canda - Best Written Submission Overall: Team 014 - University of Windsor, Canada

Latin America

- Winner: Team 028 – Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Guatemala - Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Laura Salazar - Best Orator Semi-finals: Murilo Alves Brandão Quadros - Best Orator Grand Final: Juan Hernandez - Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,

Colombia

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 TotalKevin Gu 45 42 45 45 43 49 46 44 314Samantha Black 39 39 39 38 44 43 40 37 280Ryan Manucha 45 36 40 42 40 44 43 32 277Barbara Medrado 45 37 39 39 38 35 41 40 269Laura Rowe 39 34 39 37 36 42 38 39 265Vivian Hua 39 34 38 41 35 41 37 36 262Daniel Broadus 39 0Han Seul Yoon 45 0

Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 TotalJuan Hernandez 28 50 47 48 49 45 48 46 333Nathalia Sagastume 28 48 45 45 48 42 42 40 310Jorge Andrés Gómez 34 43 48 41 48 42 42 40 304Andres Marroquin 28 48 42 43 47 39 44 35 298Laura Salazar 34 42 48 43 47 41 42 35 298Natalia Alarcón 34 42 48 41 46 36 42 38 293Luis Arango 28 0Tomás Jaramillo 34 0

Final

Page 22: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia

- Best Written Submission Overall: Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia

Page 23: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

5. Asia-Pacific Regional Round – Bangkok, Thailand

5.1 Introduction

The Asia-Pacific Regional Round was held in Bangkok, Thailand from 5 – 9 April 2018. The round was organised by the Asian Law Student’s Association’s National Chapter, namely, ALSA Thailand. The Head Organiser was Rachthep Bhatia.

5.2 Panellists

- Anne Coulon Rana – Thammasat University - Chian Voen Wong – Mayer Brown - Chotika Wittayawarakul – Chulalongkorn University - Deena Bajrai – Deputy Senior State Counsel Attorney-General’s Chambers Singapre - Fang Dong - Hongliu Gong – University of International Business and Economics - Jerry Shalmont – Universitas Pelita Harpan - Kraijakr Thiratayakinant – Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Thailand - Kunio Miyaoka – World Trade Organisation - Maria Anna Corvaglia – University of Birmingham - Marisa Goldstein – World Trade Organisation - Markus Wagner – University of Warwick - Michelle Limenta - University Pelitaharan - Philippe de Baere – Van Bael & Bellis - Piti Eiamchamroonlarp – Chulalongkorn University - Prasit Aekaputra – Thammasat University - Shashank Kumar – World Trade Organisation - Sufian Jusoh – Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia - Thanes Sucharikul – Thammasat University - Vida Soraya Versoza – Department of Foreign Affairs, Philippines

5.3 Participating Universities

- Team 004 - Soochow University - Team 008 - National Law School of India University - Team 012 - O.P. Jindal Global Law School - Team 015 - National Law University, Jodhpur Miss Nidhi Gupta - Team 017 - Sri Lanka Law College - Team 018 - National University of Singapore Faculty of Law - Team 021 - School of Transnational Law, Peking University - Team 026 - Renmin University of China, Law School - Team 029 - Tabesh University - Team 030 - Amity Law School, Delhi G.G.S.I.P.U. Faculty- Vandana Sehgal - Team 033 - National Taiwan University, College of Law - Team 041 - Gujarat National Law University - Team 044 - School of Law, Christ University

Page 24: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Team 047 - School of Law, Xiamen University - Team 049 - Tsinghua University, Faculty of Law - Team 051 - University of International Business and Economics, Faculty of Law - Team 057 - National University of Advanced Legal Studies - Team 058 - Institute of Law, Nirma University, Ahmedabad, Gujarat - Team 066 - National Law Institute University, Bhopal - Team 073 - Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow - Team 078 - National Chengchi University - Team 079 - West Bengal National University of Juridical Science, Kolkata - Team 080 - Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam, Faculty of International Law - Team 081 - Australian National University, College of Law - Team 088 - Chulalongkorn University, Faculty of Law - Team 092 - Shanghai University of International Business and Economics - Team 093 - Ateneo De Manila University Law School - Team 098 - Peking University - Team 102 - Hidayatullah National Law University; Dr. Kaumudhi Challa - Team 108 - Symbiosis Law School, Pune

Page 25: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

5.4 Preliminary Round Scores

East Asia

South Asia

5.5 Semi-Final Scores

East Asia

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 2Judge 3 Average OP Total

4 29,5 21 19 20 13 22 12 17,83333333 21,3333318 34,75 38 40 36 41 27 40 37 36,32521 35,25 33 36 35 17 20 18 26,5 29,12526 42,75 40 30 39 33 32 32 34,33333333 36,8583329 29,75 23 21 16 38 36 36 28,33333333 28,7583333 37,25 40 43 38 29 30 33 35,5 36,02547 29 36 24 29 17 12 16 22,33333333 24,2208349 38 29 37 40 26 31 24 31,16666667 33,3291751 42,75 38 39 37 39 36 34 37,16666667 38,8416778 36,75 21 22 22 40 24 38 27,83333333 30,5083380 21,75 26 22 20 21 17 34 23,33333333 22,8583381 36 35 35 37 40 37 39 37,16666667 36,8166788 12,75 21 11 18 16 38 17 20,16666667 17,9416792 28 20 14 20 20 16 32 20,33333333 22,6333393 30,25 35 37 36 35 40 35 36,33333333 34,5083398 36,25 36 35 35 25 32 26 31,5 32,925

Team WSPrelim. 1Judge 1

Prelim. 1Judge 2

Prelim. 1Judge 3

Prelim. 2Judge 1

Prelim. 2Judge 2

Prelim. 2Judge 3 Average OP Total

8 43,75 36 42 34 42 43 47 40,66666667 41,5916712 36 23 28 25 24 32 20 25,33333333 28,5333315 28,5 24 29 22 36 32 26 28,16666667 28,2666717 16,75 16 40 19 36 38 27 29,33333333 25,5583330 22,75 29 38 30 35 35 33 33,33333333 30,1583341 24 40 44 43 42 43 35 41,16666667 36,0166744 30,5 19 21 27 28 31 20 24,33333333 26,1833357 36,75 18 45 24 24 22 23 26 29,22558 38,5 29 33 30 25 26 24 27,83333333 31,0333366 31 19 20 17 30 32 29 24,5 26,487573 39 41 37 33 34 38 40 37,16666667 37,6791779 41,5 34 39 33 38 32 31 34,5 36,6

102 17,5 32 36 30 33 34 32 32,83333333 28,23333108 40,5 35 33 35 34 32 32 33,5 35,6

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Total51 37 40 40 11718 41 41 40 122

Semi Final 1

Page 26: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

South Asia

5.6 Grand Final Scores

East Asia

South Asia

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Total26 29 26 25 8081 29 27 31 87

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Total8 48 46 45 139

41 39 42 42 123

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Total73 37 33 38 10879 43 34 42 119

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Total18 42 41 40 40 38 39 37 27781 41 41 44 42 43 44 45 300

Final

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Total8 46 43 34 34 42 46 44 289

79 43 40 33 28 37 43 42 266

Final

Page 27: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

5.7 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds East Asia

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalBianca Isabel D. Soriano 93 37 38 42 36 45 31 229LI MINGZHE 51 38 40 39 39 38 34 228Samuel Saunders 81 34 35 34 45 38 40 226CAI LINGKE 51 38 37 37 40 40 32 224Samuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 40 40 39 36 25 38 218Peng-Ying Chen 33 36 43 34 30 36 38 217Andrew Ray E. Rosales 93 32 35 38 34 40 34 213Zhen-Yi Wu 33 38 42 34 26 34 34 208Hao Guo 26 36 33 39 35 32 32 207Angelica Angeles 93 35 38 39 32 30 30 204SUAH Boon Choong 18 33 35 32 34 28 40 202Lu Zikuan 98 37 34 38 26 30 32 197Jing Xu 26 33 31 38 33 30 30 195Colin WU Guolin 18 30 25 30 46 23 40 194Leyu Liu 49 24 36 40 29 34 31 194Yuting Xie 49 25 31 40 30 27 29 182Tzu-Ching Chung 78 24 26 34 25 34 32 175Xuan Zhang 21 32 34 32 20 35 18 171Hameedullah Hamdard 29 24 25 18 34 36 34 171Mohammad Aman Akrami 29 22 20 12 38 38 39 169Thao Linh NGUYEN 80 26 28 22 28 19 34 157Jiayi Wang 21 34 33 32 18 25 13 155Yu-Hsin Wu 78 12 17 30 22 34 40 155Yixu Zhao 47 34 26 32 17 13 28 150Yixuan Li 47 30 30 28 17 13 28 146Hedayatullah Jalal 29 18 16 12 31 32 30 139Pakjira Wichaidit 88 22 18 22 12 40 20 134Wang Chengjie 92 23 22 20 17 16 30 128Wang Yu-Hui 4 22 19 22 17 35 12 127Diya Sharma 81 37 40 43 120Angelique Saw 33 40 43 34 117Duc Tri VU 80 19 17 15 17 14 34 116Minh Duong BUI 80 19 16 14 16 15 34 114Danting Fan 49 31 37 40 108Maddison Godwin 81 35 36 36 107Qin Zhongyuan 98 37 32 36 105Hung Meng-Hsin 4 18 14 14 14 30 12 102Chen Xinyi 98 31 36 33 100Yujie Li 21 33 34 32 99Tai-Hang Yen 78 23 34 40 97Li Kaiqi 92 15 10 18 14 14 24 95Praewa Kasemsamran 88 12 4 13 11 36 15 91Chi-Hang Lee 33 24 32 32 88Liuting Zhang 49 27 29 30 86Zhiyu Wu 47 34 24 27 85Xue Bing 92 22 18 32 72Tien-Hui Wu 78 21 20 28 69Yang Jia-Rong 4 21 19 22 62Fengya Chen 21 15 30 13 58Huang Chengrui 92 18 16 14 48Hsieh Yun-Fang 4 10 20 12 42Qian Wei 47 14 14 12 40Benedict TEOW Kang Yong 18 0Cheng Wang 26 0Liren Luo 26 0Faridon Salehi 29 0HU HANLU 51 0LUO CHEN 51 0Au Caleb Hoi Shun 81 0Wang Yiping 98 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 28: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Preliminary Rounds South Asia

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalSaloni Gupta 41 45 48 45 44 45 38 265Unnati Ghia 8 36 42 33 44 45 46 246Yashi Saraswat 41 40 41 41 38 42 31 233Smriti Kalra 8 36 37 30 35 41 42 221Madangi Ramakrishna 108 38 37 40 41 33 32 221Anupal Dasgupta 73 39 36 35 34 36 40 220Vatsla Bhatia 30 29 37 31 39 40 39 215SHREYA GOYAL 79 37 43 38 32 32 30 212Priyanka Rai 73 41 28 30 35 36 39 209PRERNA ACHARYA 79 30 35 30 40 36 32 203Ashna Lamba 30 28 38 37 32 32 35 202Siddharth Shivakumar 102 28 35 28 41 34 31 197Suhani Chanchlani 30 27 36 31 30 33 30 187Varshini Sunder 102 35 38 30 26 32 24 185P Prasanjeet 108 34 31 25 30 31 30 181Amanda Abeysinghe 17 21 35 21 34 38 28 177Sakhi Shah 58 29 29 31 27 31 25 172Vaidehi U Menon Damodaran 57 18,5 45 25 29 26 26 169,5SARTHAK SINGLA 15 25 27 21 36 31 27 167MIHIR MATHUR 15 24 29 21 33 33 24 164Utkarsha Sharma 58 29 30 28 22 28 21 158Lavanya Gadodia 12 24 23 23 31 31 25 157Aarathi Das 57 18 40 28 28 23 18 155Saumya Singh 66 22 21 20 31 31 30 155Tarini Sardesai 12 27 28 25 23 30 20 153Neti Jhatakia 58 26 33 26 23 28 17 153Kiran Suryanarayana 44 20 21 23 30 33 21 148Sukanya Hosmani 12 21 21 18 25 29 20 134Thanuja Meegahawatta 17 21 25 21 25 20 22 134Varun Chopra 57 16 25 21 27 22 23 134Ransher Vikram Singh 66 17 20 16 26 27 26 132Tharushi Jayarathne 17 36 41 27 104Bharath Gururagavendran 44 23 30 21 74Aman Mihir 44 18 22 23 63Isuri Jayawardena 17 17 30 15 62Madhavi Singh 8 0Madhura Banerjee 12 0RISHABHA MEENA 15 0CHARULATHA JAGADISH 15 0Bellana Chaitrika Ramakrishna Reddy 41 0Kunal Gopal 41 0Gaurav Saxena 57 0Karan Parihar 58 0Pallavi Modi 66 0Anamica Singh 73 0Shubhangi Agarwal 73 0ASTHA SINGHANIA 79 0MUKUL SINGH 79 0Tanuj Kakrania 102 0Nayonika Sinha 108 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 29: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Semi-Finals East Asia

Semi-Finals South Asia

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalSUAH Boon Choong 18 43 42 42 127Colin WU Guolin 18 41 42 40 123CAI LINGKE 51 40 42 41 123Samuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 38 40 37 115LI MINGZHE 51 36 37 38 111Samuel Saunders 81 31 29 34 94Hao Guo 26 31 27 27 85Jing Xu 26 25 25 26 76Maddison Godwin 81 24 24 24 72Benedict TEOW Kang Yong 18 0Cheng Wang 26 0Liren Luo 26 0HU HANLU 51 0LUO CHEN 51 0Diya Sharma 81 0Au Caleb Hoi Shun 81 0

Semi final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalUnnati Ghia 8 46 49 45 140Smriti Kalra 8 42 44 39 125Saloni Gupta 41 41 42 42 125PRERNA ACHARYA 79 43 35 41 119SHREYA GOYAL 79 45 35 38 118Yashi Saraswat 41 38 37 42 117Priyanka Rai 73 39 35 37 111Anupal Dasgupta 73 39 33 38 110Madhavi Singh 8 0Bellana Chaitrika Ramakrishna Reddy 41 0Kunal Gopal 41 0Anamica Singh 73 0Shubhangi Agarwal 73 0ASTHA SINGHANIA 79 0MUKUL SINGH 79 0

Semi final

Page 30: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Grand Final East Asia

Grand Final South Asia

5.8 Awards

East Asia

• Winner: Team 081 - Australian National University, Australia • Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Bianca Isabel D. Soriano • Best Orator Semi-finals: SUAH Boon Choong • Best Orator Grand Final: Samuel Saunders • Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 026 - Renmin University of China, Law

School • Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 051 - University of International Business

and Economics, Faculty of Law • Best Written Submission Overall: Team 026 and Team 051, respectively Renmin University

of China and University of International Business and Economics

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 TotalSamuel Saunders 81 39 42 43 40 41 47 48 300Maddison Godwin 81 41 43 46 42 43 42 41 298Colin WU Guolin 18 42 44 43 42 43 42 40 296Samuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 40 41 40 42 40 39 42 284SUAH Boon Choong 18 36 39 39 38 33 34 33 252Benedict TEOW Kang Yong 18 0Diya Sharma 81 0Au Caleb Hoi Shun 81 0

Final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 TotalUnnati Ghia 8 44 41 35 37 43 43 45 288Smriti Kalra 8 46 43 37 27 40 45 46 284PRERNA ACHARYA 79 45 42 33 34 38 42 44 278SHREYA GOYAL 79 43 40 34 26 40 43 42 268Madhavi Singh 8 0ASTHA SINGHANIA 79 0MUKUL SINGH 79 0

Final

Page 31: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

6. African Regional Round – Grahamstown, South Africa

6.1 Introduction

The African Regional Round was held in Nairobi Kenya from 25 – 29 April 2018, hosted by Strathmore University. The Head Organiser was Harrison Mbori.

6.2 Panellists

- Alejandro Sanchez - ACWL - Babajide Sodipo - ICTSD - Dennis Muhambe - Foreign Service Officer at Ministry of Foreign Affairs and

International Trade Kenya - Dunia Zongwe – Senior Lecturer University of Botswana and Namibia - George Owuor – Procter and Gamble - Gerard Penalosa – World Trade Organisation - Henry Kibet Mutai – Kenya School of Law - Joy Wanjiku - Leah Njoroge-Kibe – Jmiles & Co. - Maryanne Macheru - State Counsel, Office of the Attorney General, Kenya - Rodolfo Rivas – Mission of the State of Israel to the WTO - Sally Mukabana – WTI Alumna Representative - Tatiana Yanguas - ACWL - Victor Crochet – Van Bael & Bellis - Wanjiku Waweru – IELPO Alumna Representative

6.3 Participating Universities

- Team 001 – University of Ibadan, Nigeria - Team 002 – University of Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania - Team 005 – Wollo University, Ethiopia - Team 007 – Faculty of Legal Political and Social Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia - Team 011 - Strathmore University, Kenya - Team 019 - Kabarak University Law School, Kenya - Team 063 - Rhodes University, South Africa - Team 069 - Dire Dawa University, Ethiopia - Team 072 - Midlands State University, Zimbabwe - Team 074 - University of The Witwatersrand, South Africa - Team 077 - National University of Lesotho, Lesotho - Team 082 - Moi University, Kenya - Team 085 - Universitry of Malawi, Malawi - Team 089 - Kenyatta University, Kenya - Team 091 - Kisii University, Kenya - Team 100 - Kenya School of Law, Kenya - Team 105 - Jigjiga University, Ethiopia - Team 106 - University ff Nairobi-Parklands, Kenya - Team 111 - Makerere University, School of Law, Uganda

Page 32: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Team 112 - Uganda Christian University, Uganda

6.4 Preliminary Round Scores

6.5 Semi-Final Scores

6.6 Grand Final Scores

Team WS 1, judge 1 1, judge 2 1, judge 3 2, judge 1 2, judge 2 2, judge 3 Average OP Total1 20,5 34 33 31 32 31 36 32,83333333 29,133332 11,75 15 27 20 22 22 22 21,33333333 18,458335 16,25 22 19 21 27 18 17 20,66666667 19,341677 35,75 42 40 41 34 35 37 38,16666667 37,44167

11 32,25 37 38 39 41 41 41 39,5 37,32519 28,75 40 42 41 42 40 42 41,16666667 37,4416763 28,25 41 39 42 43 42 42 41,5 37,52569 30,5 41 37 37 27 25 23 31,66666667 31,3166772 30,25 36 38 35 44 43 46 40,33333333 37,3083374 21,45 31 35 33 42 43 43 37,83333333 32,9183377 25,65 32 30 33 36 38 36 34,16666667 31,6116782 28 35 33 32 26 29 30 30,83333333 29,9833385 28,75 38 38 41 41 41 40 39,83333333 36,5083389 34 34 32 35 42 42 42 37,83333333 36,6833391 22,5 22 22 24 24 25 23 23,33333333 23,08333

100 26,25 45 41 42 43 46 42 43,16666667 38,09167105 6 13 8 11 22 16 30 16,66666667 13,46667106 18,25 37 44 42 28 25 25 33,5 28,925111 21,75 30 30 26 25 24 23 26,33333333 24,95833112 25,75 32 29 27,5 34 38 39 33,25 31

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total100 45 45 47 44 18119 42 43 42 42 169

Semi Final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total63 38 40 40 35 1537 35 36 38 33 142

Semi Final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 Judge 10 Total100 46 48 48 49 46 48 47 47 49 47 47563 44 44 42 45 43 45 45 43 44 45 440

Final

Page 33: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

6.7 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalZwelithini Eugene Xaba 72 36 44 42 47 47 46 262Janet Njambi Macharia 89 42 42 44 47 42 42 259Yvonne Muthembwa 100 46 40 42 41 46 42 257Samantha Tanyaradzwa Chiunzi 63 42 44 43 44 42 41 256Conrad Nyathi 72 36 44 39 47 45 45 256Annabel Nanjira 19 43 42 40 41 40 46 252Rukiya Kassim 100 42 38 40 41 47 43 251Wesley Francis Howe 63 41 39 41 44 43 42 250Olukoye Anjili Michael 19 41 40 40 43 41 44 249Jeremy Odhiambo 11 43 42 44 36 40 43 248Beatrice Wanjiku Ngunyi 89 41 39 38 44 41 42 245Lozindaba Mbvundula 85 40 39 40 41 41 42 243Marion Ogeto 11 41 41 43 35 42 40 242Ryan Hosking 74 34 40 37 43 44 43 241Atupele Masanjala 85 39 40 40 41 41 40 241Jennifer Githu 106 36 43 41 41 37 40 238Kudzanai Winnet Tsvetu 63 41 37 40 40 38 40 236Nawress Ben Aissa 7 40 38 40 37 35 39 229Elizabeth Nwarueze 1 35 35 33,5 43 37 43 226,5Kadima Cedric Moffat 19 37 38 37 37 38 38 225Amina Teyeb 7 42 39 40 34 31 37 223Faten Bram 7 44 40 40 32 30 37 223Pius Kitamirike 112 34 32 34 32 34 39 205Abigiya Abereham Deksiso 69 41 39 42 27 25 28 202Suhail Mohammed 74 26 25 25 41 42 41 200Mpho Mofoka 77 32 37 30 33 31 36 199Ahabwe Peter 112 32 31 30 32 34 40 199Okore Jack Jayalo 82 40 30 34 23 32 35 194Yusuf Olalere 1 32 31 29,5 41 28 32 193,5Moges Tsegaye Melese 69 40 38 40 25 25 24 192Claire Soit 106 40 41 40 25 22 21 189Sandra Kabaya 72 25 23 20 38 36 37 179Ayeku Adeyemi 1 35 32 32 21 27 31 178Khahliso Molefi 77 24 24 24 39 37 30 178Joshua Malidzo Nyawa 82 33 27 30 23 31 34 178Edgar Emmanuel Mugarura 111 33 32 32 28 25 26 176Charity Amoit 111 32 33 28 25 22 22 162Joshua William Mukisa 111 29 29 24 28 24 22 156Rosemary John Mzee 2 14 29 26 26 26 26 147Halifey Ayemohammed 5 25 24 22 32 22 22 147Faith Oyaro 91 23 26 25 22 22 22 140Petronillah Mauti 91 20 21 24 26 23 25 139Andrew Ojowi 11 41 44 45 130Sandra Bucha 11 43 44 42 129Steve Owuor 91 18 20 23 21 21 22 125Mwaiwathu Majawa 85 40 42 38 120Martha Mwapasa 85 40 39 38 117Selam Tilaye Bekele 69 40 38 36 114Chukwuebunigom David Mbamalu 74 37 38 38 113Ian Machanga 106 35 38 38 111Namubiru Solomy Josephine 112 34 36 41 111Hussein Mohammed 5 20 23 14 17 14 20 108Kamohelo Khoboko 77 36 35 36 107Mercy Wambui Mwangi 89 37 33 36 106Bethelhem Gobena Sine 5 20 12 18 17 16 20 103Mekonnen Mengiste Lemma 105 12 8 12 22 17 30 101Margaret Muga 82 30 31 37 98Derrick Kimani 82 38 27 30 95Mathew Muoki Muinde 89 32 31 32 95Napo Raphoolo 77 31 31 29 91Shamilah Lule Nakanwagi 112 31 29 31 91Daniel Kassaw Mohamed 69 27 22 26 75Christian Andole 106 27 22 22 71Danielle Hertz 74 22 24 23 69Boaz Kabuche Zephania 2 22 21 22 65Samuel Abebe Getahune 105 21 14 28 63Stephen Rocky Mtui 2 12 22 20 54Suleyman Ibrahim Moday 105 10 5 8 23Jimoh Mujib 1 0Grolia Kess Mwandelema 2 0Asma Nebil Abdella 5 0Salma Zairi 7 0Lawrance Kiptanui 19 0White Christopher John 63 0Kevin Omwanza 100 0Edward Asitiba 100 0

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 34: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Semi-Finals

Grand Final

6.8 Awards

- Winner Team 100 – Kenya School of Law, Kenya - Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Zwelithini Eugene Xaba - Best Orator Semi-finals: Olukoye Anjili Michael - Best Orator Grand Final: Kudzanai Winnet Tsvetu - Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 007 – Faculty of Legal Political and Social

Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia - Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 007 – Faculty of Legal Political and Social

Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia - Best Written Submission Overall: Team 007 – Faculty of Legal Political and Social

Sciences of Tunis, Tunisia

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 TotalOlukoye Anjili Michael 19 45 46 47 44 182Yvonne Muthembwa 100 44 43 47 44 178Rukiya Kassim 100 45 45 43 44 177Kudzanai Winnet Tsvetu 63 43 43 40 45 171Kadima Cedric Moffat 19 42 41 39 40 162Annabel Nanjira 19 42 42 37 40 161Nawress Ben Aissa 7 40 38 40 38 156Faten Bram 7 40 40 40 34 154Samantha Tanyaradzwa Chiunzi 63 38 40 38 37 153Wesley Francis Howe 63 35 39 38 35 147Amina Teyeb 7 37 36 37 32 142Salma Zairi 7 0Lawrance Kiptanui 19 0White Christopher John 63 0Kevin Omwanza 100 0Edward Asitiba 100 0

Semi final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 Judge 10 TotalKudzanai Winnet Tsvetu 63 48 49 45 49 48 47 47 47 50 47 477Yvonne Muthembwa 100 44 48 47 48 46 45 46 46 47 46 463Samantha Tanyaradzwa Chiunzi 63 47 45 43 44 44 43 44 42 43 45 440Wesley Francis Howe 63 41 43 42 42 40 42 41 44 38 43 416Rukiya Kassim 100 43 46 45 48 44 46 45 46 41 44 404White Christopher John 63 0Kevin Omwanza 100Edward Asitiba 100

Final

Page 35: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

6.9 Main African Regional Round Sponsor

Thanks to the UNECA contribution, all of the teams participating in the African Regional Round had their flights and accommodation covered. Without that support, it would have been impossible for the African students to take part in the Competition, given the financial barriers.

Page 36: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

7. The Final Oral Round

7.1 Introduction

The final stage of the global challenge was concluded at the FOR of the 16th ELSA Moot Court Competition that took place between 6 and 10 June 2018.

The FOR commenced with an Opening Ceremony at the WTO where Zhao Hong, an Appellate Body Member, officially opened the FOR. Afterwards, all the participants and guests were invited for a reception hosted by ELSA. All pleadings during the week took place at the Graduate Institute and the World Trade Organization venues. In the FOR, the best 25 teams from all around the world were competing with each other. On Friday we had the Sponsors Reception. In the evening we had the opportunity to join the Appellate Body Annual Report Launch where as a conclusion we announced the Semi-Finalists.

The Grand Final, chaired by the Appellate Body Member Ujal Singh Bhatia, took place on Saturday at the WTO headquarters. The winners were announced during the Award Ceremony that was led by Professor Gabrielle Marceau. Finally, an Award Dinner was hosted afterwards to conclude the whole week.

7.2 Panellists

- Aegyoung Jung – World Trade Organisation - Alejandro Sanchez - ACWL - Alexis Massot – World Trade Organisation - Clarisse Morgan – World Trade Organisation - Clotilde du Parc – Van Bael & Bellis - Dylan Geraets – Mayer Brown - Eileen Crowley – White and Case - Evangelia Anevlavi – IELPO Alumna Representative - Felipe Pietrini – Permanent Mission of Mexico tot he WTO - Fernando Bertran – World Trade Organisation - Gerard Penalosa – World Trade Organisation - Gracia Marin Duran – University College London - Horacio A. Lopez Portillo – Vazquez Tercero & Zepeda - James Nedumpara - Centre for Trade and Investment Law, Indian Institute of Foreign

Trade - Jan Yves Remy – Academic Board - Jean Philippe Herbert – World Trade Organisation - Jennifer Hillman – Georgetown University - John Adank – World Trade Organisation - Juan Pablo Moya Hoyos – World Trade Organisation - Kerry Allbeury – World Trade Organisation - Kunio Miyaoka – World Trade Organisation - Louis-Philippe Coulombe – World Trade Organisation - Maria Alcover - ACWL - Maria Anna Corvaglia – University of Birmingham

Page 37: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Marisa Goldstein – World Trade Organisation - Miguel Burnier da Silveira – World Trade Organisation - Miguel Villamizar – World Trade Organisation - Natalia Bayurova – Permanent Mission of the Russian Federation to the WTO - Natalie Tiba Sato – Nasser Sociedade de Advogados - Nataliia Kozachuk – IELPO Alumna Representative - Pablo Bentes – Steptoe & Johnson - Peter van den Bossche – Director World Trade Institute - Philippe de Baere – Van Bael & Bellis - Robert McDougall – International Trade and Trade Law Consultant - Ruxton McClure – World Trade Organisation - Sagnik Sinha – World Trade Organisation - Santiago Wills – Lewin & Wills - Sara Nordin – White and Case - Tatiana Yanguas - ACWL - Tomer Broude - Sylvan M. Cohen Chair in Law, Faculty of Law and Department of

International Relations, Academic Director, Minerva Center for Human Rights, Hebrew University of Jerusalem

- Ujal Bhatia – Chair of the Appellate Body of the World Trade Organisation - Vakho Giorgadze – World Trade Organisation - Werner Zdouc – World Trade Organisation

7.3 Participating Universities

- Team 007 - Faculty of legal political and social sciences of Tunis, Tunisia - Team 008 - National Law School of India University, India - Team 018 - National University of Singapore, Singapre - Team 019 - Kabarak University, Kenya - Team 020 - KU Leuven, Belgium - Team 023 - Istanbul Bilgi University, Turkey - Team 024 - Renmin University of China, China - Team 027 - National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece - Team 028 - Universidad Francisco Marroquin, Guatemala - Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia - Team 037 - Maastricht University, the Netherlands - Team 039 - Queen's University, Canada - Team 041 - Gujarat National Law University, India - Team 043 - University of Lucern, Switzerland - Team 045 - Harvard University, the United States - Team 051 - University of International Business and Economics, China - Team 052 - University of Amsterdam, the Netherlands - Team 061 - Graduate Institute of International and Developmental Studies, Switzerland - Team 063 - Rhodes University, South Africa - Team 073 - Dr. Ram Manohar Lohiya National Law University, Lucknow, India - Team 076 - National Research University "Higher School of Economics", Russia - Team 079 - West Bengal National University of Juridical Science, Kolkata, India

Page 38: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

- Team 081 - Australian National University, Australia - Team 094 - School of International Relations, Iran - Team 100 - Kenya School of Law, Kenya

7.4 International Organizing Committee

Without the hard work of the International Organising Committee, before and at the competition itself, the FOR would not have taken place. Thank you for all the hard work you put in to organizing and running the 16th edition of the EMC2. I would like to express my extreme gratitude towards the following Members of ELSA and my Board Members from the International Board of ELSA:

• Anastasia Kalinina – President ELSA International • Elena Maglio – Treasurer ELSA International • Georgios Manikas – Director for EMC2 • Jozua Ishwardat – Assistant for Panelists for EMC2 • Alexander Huitzi Alfonso – IOC • Filipe Machado – IOC • Elisavet Papathanasiou – IOC • Desiree Ramada – IOC • Meeri Toivanen - IOC

Page 39: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

7.5 Preliminary Round Scores

The scores of the preliminary rounds are calculated as follows: 30 % Written Submission Scores and 70 % Oral Pleading Scores. The Overall Written Submission score is based on the sum of the scores minus the penalty points according to the rules.

7.6 Quarter Final Scores

Team WS 1, judge 1 1, judge 2 1, judge 3 2, judge 1 2, judge 2 2, judge 3 Average OP Total7 35,5 29 24 24 37 37 37 31,92857143 338 43,75 49 50 50 39 40 42 44,82142857 44,518 34,75 44 45 46 48 46 47 44,39285714 41,519 29,25 30 30 30 31 43 42 33,60714286 32,320 39,5 36 38 38 34 39 37 37,35714286 3823 40,125 33 35 37 29 30 31 33,58928571 35,5526 42,75 34 35 32 37 34 32 35,25 37,527 33,75 36 34 34 42 41 40 37,25 36,228 44 40 40 44 44 37 40 41,28571429 42,134 46 42 32 37 41 42 39 39,85714286 41,737 47 37 37 35 39 41 38 39,14285714 41,539 30,25 46 44 41 41 39 36 39,60714286 36,841 24 38 41 37 43 41 44 38,28571429 3443 40,5 30 30 28 45 44 43 37,21428571 38,245 29 39 45 44 46 45 48 42,28571429 38,351 42,75 37 33 32 32 34 31 34,53571429 3752 37,125 34 40 35 42 45 37 38,58928571 38,1561 37,75 47 46 48 43 44 43 44,10714286 42,263 26,25 35 34 37 26 24 22 29,17857143 28,373 38,875 25 27 17 42 36 41 32,41071429 34,3576 39,25 39 32 36 40 41 37 37,75 38,279 41,5 31 36 32 36 36 36 35,5 37,381 36 39 37 37 44 46 42 40,14285714 38,994 8 13 12 12 11 15 15 12,28571429 11100 24,25 30 29 38 32 36 41 32,89285714 30,3

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total8 41 42 44 42 42,25

45 38 34 30 33 33,75

Quarter final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total61 46 44 45 47 45,581 45 46 45 43 44,75

Quarter final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total28 32 35 29 28 3137 37 46 34 32 37,25

Quarter final 3

Page 40: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

7.7 Semi-Final Scores

7.8 Grand Final

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Total18 46 44 42 45 44,2534 45 41 39 41 41,5

Quarter final 4

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Total61 44 46 47 48 44 47 27637 39 41 45 40 40 37 242

Semi final 1

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Total18 43 47 44 45 46 46 2718 46 49 49 49 49 45 287

Semi final 2

Team Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 Total61 40 41 50 49 48 46 46 46 46 4128 44 44 45 47 39 44 45 44 45 397

Final

Page 41: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

7.9 Individual Scores

Preliminary Rounds

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 TotalSamuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 43 45 48 47 46 48 277Argyrios Papaefthymiou 61 50 43 48 43 47 45 276Juan Hernandez 28 43 44 48 48 43 43 269Smriti Kalra 8 49 50 49 38 39 42 267Unnati Ghia 8 47 48 47 40 40 42 264Colin WU Guolin 18 40 44 41 43 46 48 262Saloni Gupta 41 40 42 39 44 46 47 258SUAH Boon Choong 18 39 40 40 43 46 48 256Kevin Gu 45 39 44 42 42 45 44 256Sara Angeleska 61 49 45 38 42 42 38 254Samuel Saunders 81 41 39 39 43 47 42 251Barbara Medrado 45 38 41 35 42 37 49 242Laura Salazar 34 42 40 37 43 41 37 240Elli Zachari 37 37 35 36 44 43 44 239Samantha Black 39 44 43 34 40 38 38 237Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 43 39 36 40 42 37 237Hao Guo 26 38 39 38 40 42 39 236Viktoriia Levchenko 76 41 35 41 39 41 36 233Jorge Andrés Gómez 34 33 40 30 48 43 38 232Yashi Saraswat 41 38 40 35 36 43 40 232Priyanka Rai 73 35 35 40 39 41 41 231Anna Sablicova 52 40 36 33 35 45 41 230Eleni-Amalia Giannakopoulou 27 36 34 32 43 42 40 227Laura Rowe 39 47 42 30 37 34 36 226Konstantin Pashuto 76 35 30 33 50 42 36 226Nathalia Sagastume 28 39 39 48 33 33 33 225Diener Eva 43 30 29 31 45 46 44 225Kehinde Ibrahim 52 38 40 32 34 40 40 224Maddison Godwin 81 40 34 36 40 42 32 224Tom Hick 20 39 34 40 36 39 35 223Aline Fadié 52 36 35 23 37 47 44 222Olukoye Anjili Michael 19 31 32 29 39 44 46 221Anupal Dasgupta 73 36 40 31 34 37 39 217Manda Wilson 20 35 41 41 31 35 32 215Antonia Mathioudaki 27 34 34 32 38 39 38 215Yvonne Muthembwa 100 30 29 40 37 42 37 215Diya Sharma 81 39 37 37 33 38 30 214Prerna Acharya 79 34 35 31 36 37 37 210Annabel Nanjira 19 31 33 33 31 39 40 207Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 32 31 32 34 40 38 207Oesch Vanessa 43 30 27 26 41 44 38 206Cai Lingke 51 40 35 32 33 34 32 206Shreya Goyal 79 30 37 32 35 36 35 205Rukiya Kassim 100 27 29 40 40 38 31 205Bengusu Guvendi 23 34 33 40 32 32 32 203Schwegler Luisa Sophie Maria 43 30 23 24 42 41 43 203Kadima Cedric Moffat 19 30 25 27 37 39 40 198Nawress Ben Alissa 7 24 24 23 41 41 41 194Li Mingzhe 51 35 32 29 31 34 32 193Faten Bram 7 27 24 24 39 38 37 189Jing Xu 26 32 29 36 34 34 24 189Amina Teyeb 7 25 24 24 39 37 39 188Wesley Francis Howe 63 34 39 41 27 23 23 187Kudzanai Winnet Tsvetu 63 36 35 42 24 24 21 182Yagmur Kaya 23 28 30 33 27 29 33 180Samantha Tanyaradzwa Chiunzi 63 31 34 31 25 23 23 167Daniel Broadus 39 50 40 40 130Han Seul Yoon 45 44 38 46 128Luis Arango 28 44 39 40 123Tomás Jaramillo 34 45 40 36 121Laís Alves 20 35 43 37 115Natalia Alarcón 34 35 40 40 115Caroline Iris Hammacher 37 36 40 38 114Ryan Manucha 45 31 40 40 111Andres Marroquin 28 32 31 40 103Mustafa Bilgin 23 34 28 39 101Livia Van Severen 20 32 35 33 100Vivian Hua 39 31 34 35 100Florence Berten 37 29 35 35 99Amirmohamad Shahriari 94 17 14 14 26 14 11 96Naser Asiabi Pourimani 94 11 11 12 28 15 10 87Burak Bedük 23 24 24 22 70Anamica Singh 73 29 25 10 64

Preliminary roundPreliminary round 1 Preliminary round 2

Page 42: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Quarter-Finals

Semi-Finals

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 TotalArgyrios Papaefthymiou 61 50 50 50 50 200

Samuel Saunders 81 49 49 49 50 197

Smriti Kalra 8 43 47 42 44 176

Samuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 44 42 43 47 176

SUAH Boon Choong 18 42 41 44 45 172

Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 45 41 43 42 171

Sara Angeleska 61 41 42 42 46 171

Unnati Ghia 8 41 44 43 40 168

Jorge Andrés Gómez 34 42 40 41 45 168

Laura Salazar 34 39 37 42 45 163

Diya Sharma 81 40 42 42 39 163

Maddison Godwin 81 41 42 41 38 162

Elli Zachari 37 34 41 45 40 160

Natalia Alarcón 34 35 38 39 43 155

Colin WU Guolin 18 35 36 39 43 153

Kevin Gu 45 34 33 38 42 147

Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 31 32 48 33 144

Barbara Medrado 45 31 31 37 41 140

Juan Hernandez 28 29 31 41 34 135

Luis Arango 28 31 32 39 32 134

Florence Berten 37 26 29 43 31 129

Han Seul Yoon 45 25 30 34 36 125

Nathalia Sagastume 28 30 25 35 31 121

Quarter final

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 TotalArgyrios Papaefthymiou 61 49 48 47 49 48 49 290Unnati Ghia 8 46 49 49 48 47 49 288Smriti Kalra 8 47 49 48 49 45 49 287Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 43 43 46 43 42 47 264Colin WU Guolin 18 40 46 40 43 47 46 262Samuel LEE Kai Chuan 18 37 47 43 44 47 44 262SUAH Boon Choong 18 41 47 42 42 45 44 261Elli Zachari 37 41 41 45 40 44 41 252Sara Angeleska 61 40 41 44 42 40 44 251Gerardo Navarro Vazquez 37 39 35 46 36 38 33 227Florence Berten 37 37 34 44 37 32 37 221

Semi final

Page 43: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Grand Final

7.10 Awards

• Winner: Team 061 – Graduate Institute of International and Developmental Studies, Switzerland

• Runner-up: Team 008 - National Law School of India University, India • Best Orator Preliminary Rounds: Samuel LEE Kai Chuan • Best Orator Quarter Finals: Argyrios Papaefthymiou • Best Orator Semi-Finals: Argyrios Papaefthymiou • Best Orator Grand Final: Smriti Kalra and Argyrios Papaefthymiou • Best Written Submission Complainant: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands • Best Written Submission Respondent: Team 034 - Pontificia Universidad Javeriana,

Colombia • Best Written Submission Overall: Team 037 – Maastricht University, the Netherlands

7.11 Concluding Remarks

Once again, the EMC2 brought teams to Geneva from across the globe for a week filled with events, learning and networking. All of them came with the same motivation and passion for trade law. All of them competing equally.

I would like to thank the Graduate Institute and all our Sponsors for the big support they have provided. Thank you for believing in us and for helping us to organize the 16th edition of the Competition. Without your support, the Competition could not be developing as consistently as it is right now.

We are also very honoured and proud of our strong partnership with the WTO, which has been the biggest partner and supporter of the Competition from the beginning. We would like to especially thank Gabrielle Marceau, Iryna Polovets, Miguel Villamizar, Marisa Goldstein, Svetlana Chobanova and all the others working behind the scenes for their incredible amount of help, infinite commitment, assistance and guidance throughout the whole 16th edition of the Competition.

I would like to deeply thank this years’ case author Dr. James Nedumpara for providing the teams with a challenging case and for cooperating with ELSA during the year. Moreover, I would like to thank all individuals who have been involved as Members of the Academic Board of the Competition and who have ensured a high academic quality of the EMC2.

Name Team no. Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge 5 Judge 6 Judge 7 Judge 8 Judge 9 TotalSmriti Kalra 8 45 46 50 50 48 49 44 47 42 421Argyrios Papaefthymiou 61 46 46 42 50 49 46 48 45 49 421Unnati Ghia 8 47 40 50 49 47 40 39 46 44 402Ioana-Virginia Motoc 61 42 40 45 48 31 41 43 40 42 372Sara Angeleska 61 40 42 45 48 26 33 41 42 44 361

Final

Page 44: Final Report 17:18 - European Law Students' … Report_16th edition...ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report 1. Background, structure and timeline 1.1 About

ELSA Moot Court Competition on WTO Law 2017/2018 Final Report

Gathering the best 25 teams in Geneva would not be possible without the Regional Rounds that were hosted by five different Organizing Committees. My sincere gratitude goes to all of them for running some of the most well-organized Rounds of this Competition in its 16-year history!

I would like to once again thank my incredibly supportive colleagues and friends on the ELSA International Board, my ELSA International Team and the whole International Organizing Committee – I could not have handled the organization of the Competition without you. I appreciate all the immense effort that you made during for this Competition throughout the whole year. Thank you for making this Competition an outstanding success.

Last but not least, thank you so much to all the teams and coaches, as well as the experts serving as Panelists during the week, for all the time and effort that you have put into the Competition. We are very happy that we were able to bring together law students from all over the world, to challenge them and to enhance their skills through the competition. Once again, the ELSA Moot Court has contributed to the future of international trade law.

Thank you all for making this edition truly unforgettable.

For the last time, I wish you all happy mooting.

Michelle Goossens Vice President for ELSA Moot Court Competitions ELSA International 2017/2018