FINAL Newcastle City Council-1 Ward Two T16 InputData OUT · STABLER, Nicholas 22 3053.8698 3054 3076 continuing continuing HAYES, Ted 29 10.6792 11 40 continuing continuing GROUP

Date: 21-09-2012 Results for Ward Two (08-09-2012) Page: 1

Ward Two Election Results Report

Election date : 08-09-2012

Report date : 21-09-2012

Number to be Elected : 3

Calculator version : 2.4.1.0

Please note, results show Candidates in Ballot Paper order except for final summary


Details for phase #1

Votes at

Phase #0

Fractions From

Phase #1

Votes Gained

Phase #1

Total After

Phase #1

Status

Phase #0

Status

Phase #1

LIBERAL

LUKE, Brad 0 8124 8124 8124 continuing continuing

STABLER, Nicholas 0 22 22 22 continuing continuing

HAYES, Ted 0 29 29 29 continuing continuing

GROUP B

BREMNER, Cathy 0 840 840 840 continuing continuing

VALENTINE, Rachael 0 15 15 15 continuing continuing

NOAKES, Peter 0 18 18 18 continuing continuing

THE GREENS

DOYLE, Therese 0 3143 3143 3143 continuing continuing

HUNT, Melanie 0 30 30 30 continuing continuing

DUSTA, Anne 0 7 7 7 continuing continuing

LABOR

CRAKANTHORP, Tim 0 5320 5320 5320 continuing continuing

NORTHAM, Mark 0 68 68 68 continuing continuing

RUTHERFORD, Val 0 28 28 28 continuing continuing

GROUP E

GILLARD, Patricia 0 792 792 792 continuing continuing

HOWARD, Andrew 0 23 23 23 continuing continuing

WALLS, Jeanne 0 8 8 8 continuing continuing

GROUP F

WALKER, Krysia 0 54 54 54 continuing continuing

PEEBLES, Col 0 150 150 150 continuing continuing

GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 0 1415 1415 1415 continuing continuing

QUINLAN, Mary 0 10 10 10 continuing continuing

SARGENT, Natilee 0 15 15 15 continuing continuing

Exhausted 0 0 0

0 20111

Quota calculated: (20111 / (3 + 1)) + 1 = 5028 [Schedule 5; 4]



Electing Candidate LUKE Brad. [Candidate received 8124 votes and quota was 5028] [Schedule 5; 5(1)]

Electing Candidate CRAKANTHORP Tim. [Candidate received 5320 votes and quota was 5028] [Schedule 5; 5(1)]

Votes at

Phase #1

Fractions From

Phase #2

Votes Gained

Phase #2

Total After

Phase #2

Status

Phase #1

Status

Phase #2

LIBERAL

LUKE, Brad 8124 0 0 8124 continuing elected(1)



GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR

CRAKANTHORP, Tim 5320 0 0 5320 continuing elected(2)



GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 0 0 0

20111 20111



Distributing surplus (3096) for Candidate LUKE Brad [Schedule 5; 6(1)]

Candidate LUKE Brad surplus votes have a transfer value of 0.3814 [Schedule 5; 6(1)(b)]

Votes at

Phase #2

Fractions From

Phase #3

Votes Gained

Phase #3

Total After

Phase #3

Status

Phase #2

Status

Phase #3

LIBERAL

LUKE, Brad 8124 -3096 -3096 5028 elected(1) elected(1)

STABLER, Nicholas 22 3053.8698 3054 3076 continuing continuing

HAYES, Ted 29 10.6792 11 40 continuing continuing

GROUP B

BREMNER, Cathy 840 5.3396 5 845 continuing continuing

VALENTINE, Rachael 15 1.5256 2 17 continuing continuing

NOAKES, Peter 18 1.1442 1 19 continuing continuing

THE GREENS

DOYLE, Therese 3143 2.2884 2 3145 continuing continuing

HUNT, Melanie 30 0.3814 0 30 continuing continuing


LABOR

CRAKANTHORP, Tim 5320 0 0 5320 elected(2) elected(2)

NORTHAM, Mark 68 0.3814 0 68 continuing continuing

RUTHERFORD, Val 28 0.7628 1 29 continuing continuing

GROUP E

GILLARD, Patricia 792 3.0512 3 795 continuing continuing



GROUP F


PEEBLES, Col 150 3.4326 4 154 continuing continuing

GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 1415 12.5862 13 1428 continuing continuing

QUINLAN, Mary 10 0.3814 0 10 continuing continuing


Exhausted 0 0 0

20111 20111



Distributing surplus (292) for Candidate CRAKANTHORP Tim [Schedule 5; 7(1)]

Candidate CRAKANTHORP Tim surplus votes have a transfer value of 0.0549 [Schedule 5; 7(4)(b)]

Votes at

Phase #3

Fractions From

Phase #4

Votes Gained

Phase #4

Total After

Phase #4

Status

Phase #3

Status

Phase #4

LIBERAL

LUKE, Brad 5028 0 0 5028 elected(1) elected(1)


HAYES, Ted 40 0.1098 0 40 continuing continuing

GROUP B

BREMNER, Cathy 845 0.1098 0 845 continuing continuing

VALENTINE, Rachael 17 0.0549 0 17 continuing continuing

NOAKES, Peter 19 0.0549 0 19 continuing continuing

THE GREENS

DOYLE, Therese 3145 1.4823 2 3147 continuing continuing

HUNT, Melanie 30 0.2196 0 30 continuing continuing

DUSTA, Anne 7 0.1098 0 7 continuing continuing

LABOR

CRAKANTHORP, Tim 5320 -292 -292 5028 elected(2) elected(2)

NORTHAM, Mark 68 286.2486 286 354 continuing continuing

RUTHERFORD, Val 29 1.3725 2 31 continuing continuing

GROUP E

GILLARD, Patricia 795 0.3843 1 796 continuing continuing

HOWARD, Andrew 23 0.0549 0 23 continuing continuing

WALLS, Jeanne 8 0.0549 0 8 continuing continuing

GROUP F

WALKER, Krysia 54 0.0549 0 54 continuing continuing

PEEBLES, Col 154 0.2196 0 154 continuing continuing

GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 1428 1.0980 1 1429 continuing continuing



Exhausted 0 0 0

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate DUSTA Anne. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 5] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #4

Fractions From

Phase #5

Votes Gained

Phase #5

Total After

Phase #5

Status

Phase #4

Status

Phase #5

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS



DUSTA, Anne 7 -7 -7 0 continuing excluded(1)

LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 0 0 0

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate WALLS Jeanne. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 6] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #5

Fractions From

Phase #6

Votes Gained

Phase #6

Total After

Phase #6

Status

Phase #5

Status

Phase #6

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS



DUSTA, Anne 0 0 0 0 excluded(1) excluded(1)

LABOR




GROUP E



WALLS, Jeanne 8 -8 -8 0 continuing excluded(2)

GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 0 0 0

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate QUINLAN Mary. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 7] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #6

Fractions From

Phase #7

Votes Gained

Phase #7

Total After

Phase #7

Status

Phase #6

Status

Phase #7

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E



WALLS, Jeanne 0 0 0 0 excluded(2) excluded(2)

GROUP F



GROUP G


QUINLAN, Mary 11 -11 -11 0 continuing excluded(3)


Exhausted 0 2 2

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate SARGENT Natilee. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 8] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #7

Fractions From

Phase #8

Votes Gained

Phase #8

Total After

Phase #8

Status

Phase #7

Status

Phase #8

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G


QUINLAN, Mary 0 0 0 0 excluded(3) excluded(3)

SARGENT, Natilee 17 -17 -17 0 continuing excluded(4)

Exhausted 2 5 7

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate VALENTINE Rachael. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 9] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #8

Fractions From

Phase #9

Votes Gained

Phase #9

Total After

Phase #9

Status

Phase #8

Status

Phase #9

LIBERAL




GROUP B


VALENTINE, Rachael 18 -18 -18 0 continuing excluded(5)


THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G



SARGENT, Natilee 0 0 0 0 excluded(4) excluded(4)

Exhausted 7 0 7

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate NOAKES Peter. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 10] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #9

Fractions From

Phase #10

Votes Gained

Phase #10

Total After

Phase #10

Status

Phase #9

Status

Phase #10

LIBERAL




GROUP B


VALENTINE, Rachael 0 0 0 0 excluded(5) excluded(5)

NOAKES, Peter 21 -21 -21 0 continuing excluded(6)

THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 7 4 11

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate HOWARD Andrew. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 11] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #10

Fractions From

Phase #11

Votes Gained

Phase #11

Total After

Phase #11

Status

Phase #10

Status

Phase #11

LIBERAL




GROUP B



NOAKES, Peter 0 0 0 0 excluded(6) excluded(6)

THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E


HOWARD, Andrew 30 -30 -30 0 continuing excluded(7)


GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 11 6 17

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate RUTHERFORD Val. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 12] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #11

Fractions From

Phase #12

Votes Gained

Phase #12

Total After

Phase #12

Status

Phase #11

Status

Phase #12

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR



RUTHERFORD, Val 34 -34 -34 0 continuing excluded(8)

GROUP E


HOWARD, Andrew 0 0 0 0 excluded(7) excluded(7)


GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 17 6 23

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate HUNT Melanie. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 13] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #12

Fractions From

Phase #13

Votes Gained

Phase #13

Total After

Phase #13

Status

Phase #12

Status

Phase #13

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS


HUNT, Melanie 37 -37 -37 0 continuing excluded(9)


LABOR



RUTHERFORD, Val 0 0 0 0 excluded(8) excluded(8)

GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 23 10 33

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate HAYES Ted. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 14] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #13

Fractions From

Phase #14

Votes Gained

Phase #14

Total After

Phase #14

Status

Phase #13

Status

Phase #14

LIBERAL



HAYES, Ted 43 -43 -43 0 continuing excluded(10)

GROUP B




THE GREENS


HUNT, Melanie 0 0 0 0 excluded(9) excluded(9)


LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 33 15 48

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate WALKER Krysia. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 15] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #14

Fractions From

Phase #15

Votes Gained

Phase #15

Total After

Phase #15

Status

Phase #14

Status

Phase #15

LIBERAL



HAYES, Ted 0 0 0 0 excluded(10) excluded(10)

GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F

WALKER, Krysia 56 -56 -56 0 continuing excluded(11)


GROUP G




Exhausted 48 2 50

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate PEEBLES Col. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 16] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #15

Fractions From

Phase #16

Votes Gained

Phase #16

Total After

Phase #16

Status

Phase #15

Status

Phase #16

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F

WALKER, Krysia 0 0 0 0 excluded(11) excluded(11)

PEEBLES, Col 208 -208 -208 0 continuing excluded(12)

GROUP G




Exhausted 50 144 194

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate NORTHAM Mark. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 17] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #16

Fractions From

Phase #17

Votes Gained

Phase #17

Total After

Phase #17

Status

Phase #16

Status

Phase #17

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR


NORTHAM, Mark 385 -385 -385 0 continuing excluded(13)


GROUP E




GROUP F


PEEBLES, Col 0 0 0 0 excluded(12) excluded(12)

GROUP G





20111 20111



Excluding Candidate GILLARD Patricia. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 18] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #17

Fractions From

Phase #18

Votes Gained

Phase #18

Total After

Phase #18

Status

Phase #17

Status

Phase #18

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS




LABOR


NORTHAM, Mark 0 0 0 0 excluded(13) excluded(13)


GROUP E

GILLARD, Patricia 832 -832 -832 0 continuing excluded(14)



GROUP F



GROUP G





20111 20111



Excluding Candidate BREMNER Cathy. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 19] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #18

Fractions From

Phase #19

Votes Gained

Phase #19

Total After

Phase #19

Status

Phase #18

Status

Phase #19

LIBERAL




GROUP B

BREMNER, Cathy 907 -907 -907 0 continuing excluded(15)



THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E

GILLARD, Patricia 0 0 0 0 excluded(14) excluded(14)



GROUP F



GROUP G




Exhausted 1159 715 1874

20111 20111



Excluding Candidate O'NEILL Helene. [Candidate had lowest order of standing at round 20] [Schedule 5; 9(5)]

Votes at

Phase #19

Fractions From

Phase #20

Votes Gained

Phase #20

Total After

Phase #20

Status

Phase #19

Status

Phase #20

LIBERAL




GROUP B

BREMNER, Cathy 0 0 0 0 excluded(15) excluded(15)



THE GREENS




LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 1607 -1607 -1607 0 continuing excluded(16)



Exhausted 1874 1293 3167

20111 20111



Electing Candidate DOYLE Therese. [There is 1 vacancy remaining and the Candidate has a progressive total of 3477

which is > than 3411 (the total votes and available surplus of all other continuing Candidates)] [Schedule 5; 11(2)]

Votes at

Phase #20

Fractions From

Phase #21

Votes Gained

Phase #21

Total After

Phase #21

Status

Phase #20

Status

Phase #21

LIBERAL




GROUP B




THE GREENS

DOYLE, Therese 3477 0 0 3477 continuing elected(3)



LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 0 0 0 0 excluded(16) excluded(16)




20111 20111



Marking Candidate STABLER Nicholas as unsuccessful. [All available positions were filled]

Votes at

Phase #21

Fractions From

Phase #22

Votes Gained

Phase #22

Total After

Phase #22

Status

Phase #21

Status

Phase #22

LIBERAL


STABLER, Nicholas 3411 0 0 3411 continuing unsuccessful


GROUP B




THE GREENS

DOYLE, Therese 3477 0 0 3477 elected(3) elected(3)



LABOR




GROUP E




GROUP F



GROUP G

O'NEILL, Helene 0 0 0 0 excluded(16) excluded(16)




20111 20111


Final Result in Order of Standing

Candidate Group Final Votes Final Status

LUKE, Brad LIBERAL 5028 elected(1)

CRAKANTHORP, Tim LABOR 5028 elected(2)

DOYLE, Therese THE GREENS 3477 elected(3)

O'NEILL, Helene GROUP G 0 excluded(16)

BREMNER, Cathy GROUP B 0 excluded(15)

GILLARD, Patricia GROUP E 0 excluded(14)

NORTHAM, Mark LABOR 0 excluded(13)

PEEBLES, Col GROUP F 0 excluded(12)

WALKER, Krysia GROUP F 0 excluded(11)

HAYES, Ted LIBERAL 0 excluded(10)

HUNT, Melanie THE GREENS 0 excluded(9)

RUTHERFORD, Val LABOR 0 excluded(8)

HOWARD, Andrew GROUP E 0 excluded(7)

NOAKES, Peter GROUP B 0 excluded(6)

VALENTINE, Rachael GROUP B 0 excluded(5)

SARGENT, Natilee GROUP G 0 excluded(4)

QUINLAN, Mary GROUP G 0 excluded(3)

WALLS, Jeanne GROUP E 0 excluded(2)

DUSTA, Anne THE GREENS 0 excluded(1)

STABLER, Nicholas LIBERAL 3411 unsuccessful

Documents

FINAL Newcastle City Council-1 Ward Two T16 InputData OUT · STABLER, Nicholas 22 3053.8698 3054 3076 continuing continuing HAYES, Ted 29 10.6792 11 40 continuing continuing GROUP