Upload
danso-appiah-larry
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
1/19
Topic Description
In 2004 the Bryant Patton Bridge over Apalachicola Bay in the Florida panhandle was replaced. During demolition, twelve
prestressed concrete piles with varying levels of corrosion damage were recovered. Two of the selected piles were equipped with a
cathodic protection that had been installed in 1994 as part of a repair project involving most of the piles supporting the bridge.
REsults of flexural and material testing that were conducted on the recovered piles will be presented.
Speaker Biography
H. R. (Trey) Hamilton III, P.E., PhD is an Associate Professor of Civil Engineering at the University of Florida in the Department
of Civil & Coastal Engineering. His research and teaching interests include reinforced and prestressed concrete.
University of Florida
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
2/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
St George Island Bridge Pile TestingSt George Island Bridge Pile Testing
Trey Hamilton, P.E., Ph.D.Trey Hamilton, P.E., Ph.D.University of FloridaUniversity of Florida
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
FDOT Research CenterFDOT Research Center
Mr. Marc Ansley, Project ManagerMr. Marc Ansley, Project Manager
Eric Cannon, ClaireEric Cannon, Claire LewingerLewinger andand LazLaz Alfonso,Alfonso,
CaesarCaesar AbiAbi, UF Graduate Students, UF Graduate Students
Frank Cobb, Tony Johnston, David Allen, PaulFrank Cobb, Tony Johnston, David Allen, Paul
TigheTighe, and Steve, and Steve EudyEudy of the FDOT Structuresof the FDOT StructuresResearch CenterResearch Center
Mr. ScottMr. Scott GrosGros ofofBohBoh Bros. ConstructionBros. Construction
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
3/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
AcknowledgementsAcknowledgements
Mr. RichardMr. Richard DelorenzoDelorenzo, FDOT State Materials, FDOT State Materials
Office (strand testing)Office (strand testing)
Mr. DonMr. Don BuwaldaBuwalda and the inspection team fromand the inspection team from
FDOT District TwoFDOT District Two
Mr. IvanMr. Ivan LasaLasa from the Corrosion Group of thefrom the Corrosion Group of the
FDOT State Materials OfficeFDOT State Materials Office
Mr. WilliamMr. William ScannellScannell ofofConcorrConcorr, Florida, Inc., Florida, Inc.
OutlineOutline
IntroductionIntroduction
Pile RecoveryPile Recovery
TestingTesting
ResultsResults
ConclusionsConclusions
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
4/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
LocationLocation
Apalachicola Bay
Bryant Grady
Patton Bridge
St. George
Island
HistoryHistory Bryant Grady PattonBryant Grady Patton
BridgeBridge
Constructed in 1965.Constructed in 1965.
Carries SR 300 over Apalachicola BayCarries SR 300 over Apalachicola Bay
Pile repair in 1994Pile repair in 1994
PatchPatch
Concrete jacketingConcrete jacketing
Cathodic protectionCathodic protection Removed from service 2004Removed from service 2004
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
5/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
1994 Repair Program1994 Repair Program
Cathodic Protection SystemCathodic Protection System
Sprayed Zinc
Zinc Mesh
Bulk Anode
Splash
Zone
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
6/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
ObjectivesObjectives
Evaluate remaining flexural capacity of pilesEvaluate remaining flexural capacity of piles
Why? Resistance to lateral loads such as bargeWhy? Resistance to lateral loads such as barge
impact.impact.
Compare tested capacity to visual ratingCompare tested capacity to visual rating
Why? Most inspections are visual with ratings usedWhy? Most inspections are visual with ratings used
to classify state of bridge.to classify state of bridge.
TasksTasks
Select pilesSelect piles
Visual inspection and corrosion potentials inVisual inspection and corrosion potentials inplaceplace
Sample dissolved hydrogen in CP pileSample dissolved hydrogen in CP pile
Sample chloride content of concreteSample chloride content of concrete
Structural testingStructural testing
PostPost--test evaluationtest evaluation
Materials testingMaterials testing
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
7/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
RecoveryRecovery SelectionSelection
FDOT D2 InspectionFDOT D2 Inspection
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
8/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
RecoveryRecovery Cap Beam RemovalCap Beam Removal
RecoveryRecovery Pile RemovalPile Removal
12 piles recovered and tested12 piles recovered and tested
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
9/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
RecoveryRecovery Pile RemovalPile Removal
On site sampling of prestressingOn site sampling of prestressingstrands for dissolved hydrogenstrands for dissolved hydrogen
RecoveryRecovery Pile PreparationPile Preparation
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
10/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
Specimen DetailsSpecimen Details
(20) 7/ 16(20) 7/ 16--in. diameter stress relieved 7in. diameter stress relieved 7--wirewire
prestressing strandsprestressing strands
Average tested tensile strength of strands = 261Average tested tensile strength of strands = 261
ksiksi
Core concrete strength = 6200 psiCore concrete strength = 6200 psi
Flexural Test SetFlexural Test Set--upup
SCALE: NTS
HIGH/LOW WATERMARK
LOAD CELL
42" TRANSFER BEAMCENTERED BETWEENWATER MARKS
PLATE 9" x 18" x 2" (TYP.)
9" x 18" x 1 1/2" NEOPRENE
BEARING PAD (TYP.)
CLEVIS LOAD CELLS
36"
SUPPORT SUPPORT
HIGH/LOW WATERMARK
9" x 18" x 2" NEOPRENEBEARING PAD (TYP.)
PLACE SUPPORT INBOARD FROM DAMAGE (TYP.)
SPLASH ZONE MOST HEAVILY DAMAGED
FACE PLACED DOWN
a b
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
11/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
Flexural Test SetFlexural Test Set--upup
Typical Flexural BehaviorTypical Flexural Behavior
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
12/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
Typical Flexural BehaviorTypical Flexural Behavior
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Displacements (in)
Loa
d(kips
)
Corrosion DamageCorrosion Damage
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
13/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
Flexural Test ResultsFlexural Test Results
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
40-3J
32-3J
44-3CP
39-2
40-2
31-1
44-1CP
44-4
44-2
29-2
33-4J
40-4
Pile
Norma
lize
dMomen
tCapac
ity
Corrosion PotentialsCorrosion Potentials
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
-700 -600 -500 -400 -300 -200 -100 0
Corrosion Potentials (mVCSE)
Elevation(ft)
AboveMHW
40-3
32-3
40-4
39-2
44-2
29-2
350mVCSE
7/31/2019 Final Hamilton StGeorge
14/19
Use of FRP Composites to Repair and
Strengthen Concrete Bridges
October 5, 20
Corrosion PotentialsCorrosion Potentials
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0 20 40 60 80 100 120
Remaining Flexural Capacity (%)
Distancea
bove
MHW
where
Corros
ion
Po
ten
tia
l