61
Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Final Exam

• April 21 and 22• Not cumulative• 45 percent• Same format as midterms

Page 2: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Got technical skills?

• Auditory perception lab is looking for computer science or equivalent student with good technical skills

• See me after class

Page 3: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Next week:

• Read Vokey et al.

• Turn in idea journal Thursday

Page 4: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Model of Memory

Turning now to Long-Term Memory

Sensory Signals

Sensory Memory

Short-Term Memory

Long-Term Memory

ATTENTION

REHEARSAL

RETRIEVAL

Page 5: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Long-Term Memory

• Characteristics (intuitive with some introspection):

– Persists indefinitely (up to decades!)

– Requires no active process of rehearsal (at least that we are conscious of)

Page 6: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Endel Tulving: There are two broad categories of information that are represented in LTM -

• Episodic Memory: memory of an event in your life

• autobiographical• has a temporal context - something about time

is encoded along with the memory

Page 7: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Some Distinctions in LTM

• Endel Tulving: There are two broad categories of information that are represented in LTM -

• Semantic Memory: memory of facts, knowledge of the world

• unconnected to an autobiographical event• no temporal context

Page 8: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Some Distinctions in LTM

• There is a third category:

• Procedural Memory: memory for actions

Page 9: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Capacity is huge (unlimited?)

Page 10: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative

Page 11: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– Evidence: Semantic Priming in a Lexical-

Decision Task

• Priming: prior exposure to some stimulus modifies subsequent processing of a target

Page 12: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– Evidence: Semantic Priming in a Lexical-

Decision Task

• Lexical Decision Task: Subject is shown a target word or pronounceable non-word (eg. gap or fap) and must respond “word” or “non-word”

Page 13: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– Evidence: Semantic Priming in a Lexical-

Decision Task

• manipulation: prime can be either related or unrelated to the target word

Page 14: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– Evidence: Semantic Priming in a Lexical-

Decision Task

• result: words are identified faster when preceded by a semantically related prime

Prime + Target= Response

“space” “gap” fast

“truck” “gap” slow

Page 15: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Semantic Memory

• Structure of encoding is associative– Evidence: Semantic Priming in a Lexical-

Decision Task– Interpretation:

• the representation of information in semantic memory is associative:

• each fact or piece of knowledge is stored along with its relationship to other stored information

• related items can activate each other which facilitates recall

Page 16: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Episodic Memory

• Memory for an episode or event in your own life

• Has temporal context (entails a sense of duration and date)

• examples:– recall breakfast– what happened this weekend

Page 17: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Recall is highly sensitive to context - Similarities in context (especially smell) can trigger vivid recollections

Page 18: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information

• Levels-of-Processing Theory

Page 19: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information

• Levels-of-Processing Theory– Consider this experiment:

ListCATpiePILLOWTREE

Method of Learning• stating capitals or lower-case•repeating words• putting words into a sentence

Recall is tested some time later.

Page 20: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information

• Levels-of-Processing Theory– Consider this experiment:

Result:•Best recall with “deep” processing•Worst recall with “surface” processing

ListCATpiePILLOWTREE

Page 21: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory is affected by the nature of your engagement with the information• Interpretation:

– the successful use of memory depends on the number of connections that are made between related items and the degree to which these are initially activated

Page 22: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• context is critical!– location, physiological state, etc. affect ability to recall and your confidence

that you recalled correctly– e.g. lists of words are recalled better when recalled where they were first

learned

Page 23: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:

Page 24: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:

• Unavailable– It wasn’t successfully encoded - something

went wrong while you were studying

Page 25: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

When You Don’t Remember

• Two reasons why you don’t remember:

• Unavailable– It wasn’t successfully encoded - something

went wrong while you were studying

• Inaccessible– memory is stored but cannot be retrieved,

perhaps because appropriate connections aren’t being made

Page 26: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Recall is a generative processes rather than simply calling up stored data

Page 27: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Recall is a generative processes rather than simply calling up stored data

• Evidenced by the fact that episodic memories can be distorted or completely false under certain circumstances

Page 28: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect - exposure to information subsequent to storage of memory can alter the contents of the memory

Page 29: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect

• Consider the following example: – Subjects were shown a video depicting a

car accident

Page 30: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect • Consider the following example:

– Subjects were shown a video depicting a car accident

– Then given the following question: “How fast were the vehicles going when they ______”

Page 31: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect • Consider the following example:

– Subjects were shown a video depicting a car accident

– Then given the following question: “How fast were the vehicles going when they ______”

– Different subjects were asked questions that differed in the “magnitude” of the final word

Page 32: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect • Consider the following example:

– Subjects were shown a video depicting a car accident

– Then given the following question: “How fast were the vehicles going when they ______”

– Different subjects were asked questions that differed in the “magnitude” of the final word

– The possible words were: Contacted, Hit, Bumped, Collided, and Smashed

Page 33: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect

• Consider the following example: – Average estimated velocity depended on

the nature of the question

Page 34: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Misinformation Effect

• Interpretation:– Episodic memory can be distorted by

subsequent information

Page 35: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory for episodes in life can be illusory

Page 36: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory for episodes in life can be illusory

• Consider the example in Loftus’ article:– participant was induced to have an episodic

memory of being lost in a mall

Page 37: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• Memory for episodes in life can be illusory

• Consider the example in Loftus’ article:– participant was induced to have an episodic

memory of being lost in a mall– Even when told the memory is a false one, the

participant had difficulty recognizing it as an invalid memory

Page 38: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Recalling Episodic Memory

• False Memories may arise when details of a crime are in question as in eye-witness testimony or repressed memories of abuse during childhood

Page 39: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit and Explicit Memory: yet another distinction

• Are all memories explicit? Is all information stored in the brain subject to conscious scrutiny?

Page 40: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit and Explicit Memory: yet another distinction

• Are all memories explicit? Is all information stored in the brain subject to conscious scrutiny?

• Implicit Memory refers to encoded memories that are not part of the “contents” of awareness

Page 41: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit and Explicit Memory: yet another distinction

• How can we know whether memory is stored/recalled implicitly or explicitly?

Page 42: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

• Consider the following distinction in recalling items from a list of words:

Page 43: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

• Consider the following distinction in recalling items from a list of words:

• Free Recall - subjects can be asked to simply recall and report as many items as possible - these items are accessible as explicit memory

Page 44: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

• Consider the following distinction in recalling items from a list of words:

• Implicit Recall - subjects can be asked to complete a word stem with any word that comes to mind after reading a list of words (no mention of testing memory!)

__ack

Page 45: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

• Consider the following distinction in recalling items from a list of words:

• Implicit Recall - subjects can be asked to complete a word stem with any word that comes to mind after reading a list of words (no mention of testing memory!)

But how do you know that information is stored/recalled implicitly? Couldn’t it be explicit?

Page 46: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

• Consider the following distinction in recalling items from a list of words:

• Twist - require subject to complete stem with a word that wasn’t on the list - if a word from the list is used preferentially, it was remembered implicitly

Page 47: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

Consider the implications regarding the nature of consciousness and the connection between neural activity and awareness

Page 48: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Implicit Memory

Consider the implications regarding the nature of consciousness and the connection between neural activity and awareness

Not all of the activity in your brain generates experience - some is “sub”conscious or non-conscious

Page 49: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Repressed Memories

Elizabeth Loftus

Page 50: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

“Derepressed memories”

• Loftus opens with several examples of court cases that involve “derepressed memories”

• What is a repressed memory?

• What is a derepressed memory?

Page 51: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Loftus’ position in this article

• Loftus does not reject the notion of repressed memories– 18% - 59% of abuse survivors report

having regained access to previously repressed memories

Page 52: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Loftus’ position in this article

• Loftus does not reject the notion of repressed memories– 18% - 59% of abuse survivors report

having regained access to previously repressed memories

• What does Loftus challenge?

Page 53: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Loftus’ position in this article

• Loftus does not reject the notion of repressed memories– 18% - 59% of abuse survivors report

having regained access to previously repressed memories

• What does Loftus challenge?

…That all “de-repressed” memories are accurate memories.

Page 54: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

High Stakes

• Survivor of real abuse might struggle for years or decades with consequences and need to confront the repressed memory in order to recover emotionally

• False accusation could tear family apart and send an innocent person to jail

Page 55: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• What does Loftus express concern about regarding the derepression of memories?

Page 56: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• What does Loftus express concern about regarding the derepression of memories?– reality of the memory is in question if it is recalled under

certain circumstances

Page 57: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• What does Loftus express concern about regarding the derepression of memories?– reality of the memory is in question if it is recalled under

certain circumstances

• What is the course of events that Loftus finds worrisome?

Page 58: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• What does Loftus express concern about regarding the derepression of memories?– reality of the memory is in question if it is recalled under

certain circumstances

• What is the course of events that Loftus finds worrisome?

Therapist or Popular Book suggests that patient consider possibility of abuse

Patient engages in intense effort to recall

An explicit episodic memory is achieved

This memory might be false!

Page 59: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• So we potentially have a situation in which someone who is having troubles in life and is seeking answers is told to determine whether or not memories for abuse exist

• What are some techniques that are used to “assist” recollection?

Page 60: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

What’s the issue?

• So we potentially have a situation in which someone who is having troubles in life and is seeking answers is told to determine whether or not memories for abuse exist

• What are some techniques that are used to “assist” recollection?– hypnosis, imagery, dream analysis, story telling– Loftus presents evidence that such processes may lead to

invalid memories or overconfidence in the validity of memories

Page 61: Final Exam April 21 and 22 Not cumulative 45 percent Same format as midterms

Conclusion:

• We cannot know with certainty (without corroborating evidence) whether a derepressed memory is true

• Therapists should engage in probing this possibility very carefully– avoiding suggestive questions– remaining unconvinced without corroborating

evidence– being “gently confrontational” to encourage patient

to consider the possibility that the events didn’t happen