Final Environmental Compliance Activities Report - Hilo ...€¦ · Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Report 2.0 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AUDIT OVERVIEW The Phase

FINALEnvironmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities Report

U.S. Coast Guard Housing Site36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi PlaceHilo, Hawaii 96720

Contract No. GS-10F-0230J / GS-00P-14-CY-A-0003 / Order No. GS-P-00-16-CY-7127

June 2017

FINALExecutive Summary Report

Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities Report

U.S. Coast Guard Housing Site36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21

Honi PlaceHilo, Hawaii 96720


Prepared For:

United States General Services AdministrationOffice of Real Property Utilization and Disposal

1800 F Street, NWWashington, DC 20405

Prepared By:

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.46850 Magellan Drive, Suite 190

Novi, Michigan 48377

June 2017

Amec Foster Wheeler Project No: 32106D009.0004

Date of Site Visit: 4-5 October 2016

Erica Geasler-Bromley, P.E.Project Manager

Lauren BugdalskiGeologist

United States Coast GuardHousing Site in Hilo, HawaiiEnvironmental Compliance Due Diligence Report

T AB L E O F C O N T E N T S

ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST......................................................................................II 1.0 INTRODUCTION..........................................................................................................1-1

1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION.............................................................1-1

2.0 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AUDIT OVERVIEW............................2-1

3.0 ACM SURVEY AND CONDITION/RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW ...............................3-1

4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENT OVERVIEW .............4-1

5.0 LEAD IN SOIL SAMPLING OVERVIEW .......................................................................5-1

6.0 MOLD SAMPLING OVERVIEW....................................................................................6-1

7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND NEPA DATA GATHERING OVERVIEW......7-1

8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.............................................................8-1 8.1 CONCLUSIONS................................................................................................8-1 8.2 RECOMMENDATIONS.....................................................................................8-2 8.3 LIMITATIONS ...................................................................................................8-2

9.0 REFERENCES.............................................................................................................9-1

T AB L E S

Table 1 Summary of Site Information

F I G U R E S

Figure 1 Site Location MapFigure 2 Site Layout Map

AP P E N D I C E S

Appendix A Phase I EDDA ReportAppendix B Asbestos Containing Material Survey ReportAppendix C Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Inspection and Risk Assessment ReportAppendix D Lead in Soil Sampling ReportAppendix E Mold Sampling ReportAppendix F Environmental Information and NEPA Data Gathering Report

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC iJune 2017Final


ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST

ACM Asbestos Containing MaterialAmec Foster Wheeler Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.ASTM American Society for Testing and Materials

bgs below ground surface

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CEQ Council on Environmental QualityCFATF Civilian Federal Agency Task ForceCFR Code of Federal Regulations

EAL Environmental Action LevelEDDA Environmental Due Diligence AuditEO Executive OrderESA Endangered Species Act

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

GSA General Services AdministrationGuidance Guide on Evaluating Environmental Liability for Property Transfers

HDOH Hawaii Department of HealthHUD Housing and Urban Development

IPaC USFWS’ Information, Planning, and Conservation System

LBP lead-based paintmg/kg milligram per kilogram

NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NHPA National Historic Preservation Act

OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration

PLM Polarized Light Microscopyppm parts per million

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC iiJune 2017Final


REC Recognized Environmental ConditionRSL Reginal Screening Level

SFHA Special Flood Hazard AreaSHPD State Historic Preservation DivisionSIHP State Inventory of Historic PlacesSite 36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78

Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi Place, Hilo, HawaiiSOW Scope of Work

U.S. United StatesUSC United States CodeUSCG United States Coast GuardUSEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSFWS United States Fish and Wildlife Service

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC iiiJune 2017Final


1.0 INTRODUCTION

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) was retained by the United States (U.S.) General Services Administration (GSA) to perform Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities in support of the United States Coast Guard (USCG) housing sales. The Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities included a Phase I Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA), lead- based paint (LBP) survey, asbestos containing material (ACM) survey, lead in soil sampling, mold sampling, and sensitive environmental area review, including National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) data gathering. The Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities were conducted for the USCG Housing Site located at 36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi Place, Hilo, Hawaii (Site) (Figure 1). Amec Foster Wheeler was authorized to conduct these activities under the U.S. GSA Contract Number GS-10F-0230J / GS-00P-14-CY-A-0003 and Award Number GS-P-00-16-CY-7127. Amec Foster Wheeler’srepresentative Ms. Hope Mariska performed the site visit on October 4-5, 2016. Access to the Site was granted by Mr. Mark Marini, USCG Environmental Engineer. It is Amec Foster Wheeler’s understanding that the USCG performed these environmental activities in preparation for divestiture of the property.

1.1 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The USCG housing unit property is located in Hilo, Hawaii (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the site layout. The Site is located in a Residential Zoned Area. Table 1 below summarizes the site information.

Table 1: Summary of Site Information

Address Year BuiltUnit Size(square

feet)

Lot Size(acre)

Unit Description Occupied

21 Honi Place Approx. 1975

Approx. 1,500 0.2083

Three-bedroom, two-bathroom

houseNo

36 Mokihana Street Approx. 1975

Approx. 1,400 0.2043


houseNo


Approx. 1,500 0.2329


houseNo


Approx. 1,400 0.1791


houseYes


Approx. 1,400 0.184


houseYes

Project No.: 32106D009 Page 1-1June 2017Final


At the time of the site visit, the property at 21 Honi Place was observed to be a one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family home constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. The approximately 1,500 square foot house was constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick and a metal roof. Flooring was hardwood and vinyl tile. The house was undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection. A concrete driveway was present with a two-car carport. The lot included a back yard with a storage shed.

The property at 36 Mokihana Street was observed to be a one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family home constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. The approximately 1,400 square foot house was constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick and a metal roof. Flooring was hardwood and vinyl tile. A concrete driveway was present with a two-car carport. The lot included a back yard with a storage shed.

The property at 47 Mokihana Street was observed to be a one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family home constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. The approximately 1,500 square foot house was constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick and a metal roof. Flooring was hardwood and vinyl tile. The house was undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection. A concrete driveway was present with a two-car carport. The lot included a back yard with a storage shed.





2.0 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AUDIT OVERVIEW

The Phase I EDDA was performed in general accordance with the Civilian Federal Agency Task Force (CFATF) Guide on Evaluating Environmental Liability for Property Transfers, dated August 1998 (Guidance), the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13was used as a reference for conducting the EDDA, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as detailed in Section 120(h)(4)(A)(i) to (vii).

As specified under these standards, certain responsibilities lie with the “user” of the assessment.The “user” is defined as the party who intends to use the Guidance to perform an assessment.The “user” is generally the purchaser, owner, lender, property manager, or potential tenant, and, for the purposes of this project, is considered to be the U.S. GSA. Under the Guidance, it is the responsibility of the “user” to verify whether any environmental liens exist with regard to the property, and provide this information to the environmental professional preparing the assessment. Additionally, the “user” must make the professional aware of any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to identifying environmental liability concerns in connection with the property.

In conducting this assessment, Amec Foster Wheeler’s work was performed consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. Information provided to Amec Foster Wheeler by client representatives and site contacts has been accepted in good faith and is assumed to be accurate unless written documentation or visual observations were contradictory. Amec Foster Wheeler’s findings are based on observations and data collected at one point in time. Assessment results are based upon conditions and operations at the time of the site visit. A change in any of these factors may alter the findings and conclusions expressed by Amec Foster Wheeler.

A Phase I EDDA, by nature, is limited in its ability to fully assess potential environmental liabilities or concerns associated with a property. Further investigation would be required to identify potential environmental liabilities that may be present at the Site, but were beyond detection by performance of the scope of the Phase I EDDA. State and Federal laws and regulations, if referenced in this report, are provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal opinion or recommendation.

This Phase I EDDA was completed under the direction of Amec Foster Wheeler’s client, the U.S. GSA, for use by the U.S. GSA and the USCG. By definition, a Phase I EDDA consists of a limited records search and site visit to identify potential environmental issues at the Site. To completely delineate any potential environmental issue at the Site, further work beyond the scope of a Phase I EDDA may be necessary. Use of this report by any parties other than Amec Foster Wheeler, the U.S. GSA, and USCG is expressly prohibited.



Amec Foster Wheeler’s scope of services for the Phase I EDDA consisted of the following activities:

Review certain federal and state regulatory agency databases for the Site and properties within a 1/8 to one-mile radius around the Site;

Review and evaluate readily available historical records, including topographical maps, historical aerial photographs, and historical fire insurance maps;

Research information publicly available and reasonably ascertainable to determine site usage since first development, or 1940, whichever is earlier;

Contact various city and/or county agencies for environmental information pertaining to the Site;

Conduct site reconnaissance to evaluate current site conditions and note visual evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs);

Conduct visual reconnaissance of properties within 1/2 mile of the Site;

Interview people with significant knowledge of the Site;

Review and detail the sources of information outlined in CERCLA 120(h)(4)(A)(i)-(vii);

Identify any RECs as defined by ASTM 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; and,

Prepare this report summarizing Amec Foster Wheeler’s findings.

The complete Phase I EDDA report, tables, and figures are included in Appendix A.



3.0 ACM SURVEY AND CONDITION/RISK ASSESSMENT REVIEW

Information provided by the USCG indicates that an asbestos survey has not been previously conducted at the Site. Amec Foster Wheeler performed an ACM survey to identify, based on visual inspection and industry knowledge, and sample suspected ACM associated with building materials. It is important to note that this was a non-destructive survey, and inaccessible areas (e.g. within wall cavities, above drop-ceilings, beneath the top flooring layer, etc.) were not surveyed. This survey documents only general locations of suspect materials and does not determine the exact boundaries of ACM. ACM may be present on-site in locations beyond what is described here-in.

ACMs are fibrous hydrated silicates, and can be found in building materials as either “friable” or “non-friable” asbestos products. Friable asbestos refers to materials, which can be readily crumbled using hand pressure, separating asbestos fibers from the binding materials with which they are associated. Friable asbestos is commonly found in boiler and pipe insulation. Non-friable material refers to asbestos, which is associated with a binding agent (such as tar or cement), preventing ready release of airborne fibers, and is separated into two categories. Category I non-friable ACMs are asbestos-containing resilient floor coverings (like vinyl asbestos tile), asphalt roofing products, packings, and gaskets. These materials rarely become friable because the asbestos is locked securely into the material. All other non-friable ACMs are considered category II non-friable ACM. Category II non-friable ACMs are more likely to become friable because they are not as resistant to crushing or pulverizing.

The use of friable ACMs was discontinued in the United States in the late 1970s to early 1980s, although non-friable asbestos is still found in many more recent buildings such as ceiling tiles,floor tiles, asbestos cement, and in certain types of cementaceous pipe materials. Asbestos may become an issue during renovation, alteration, maintenance or demolition activities, or when ACMs are taken out-of-service. Materials identified as containing asbestos, and which are in poor condition, should immediately be managed either by proper encapsulation or removal.

In commercial buildings where a building owner has knowledge of the presence of ACM or an asbestos inspection has revealed/confirmed the presence of ACMs, the building owner is required to properly communicate the ACM hazard to all employees, workers, contractors, and occupants, and manage the ACM in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 and the Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) 3096. ACM is defined by OSHA as any material containing more than 1% asbestos. If analysis identifies a sampled material as containing an amount greater than 1% asbestos, this material is deemed a regulated asbestos containing material and must be handled and disposed of accordingly.

Amec Foster Wheeler completed an ACM survey at the Site. The ACM survey was conducted by Ms. Hope Mariska, a licensed asbestos inspector. Bulk samples collected during the site survey were analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining in accordance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Method 600/R-93/116. PLM is an analytical method for asbestos identification, which depends on the unique optical properties of mineral forms in the samples and specifically identified the various asbestos types.



Forty-three (43) samples of suspect ACM were obtained during this survey from the USCG Site.Analysis results indicate that ACM was either not detected in the building materials sampled, or detected at less than 1%.

A destructive asbestos building survey and condition/risk assessment was not conducted, and ACMs may be present in inaccessible areas such as wall cavities. Based on the intended use of the property, no further action related to ACM is necessary at this time. A copy of the full Asbestos Survey and Condition/Risk Assessment report is included in Appendix B.



4.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT INSPECTION AND RISK ASSESSMENTOVERVIEW

Prior to the late 1970s many paints contained lead. When these paints become damaged, i.e., peeling or flaking, or the painted surface is renovated or demolished, lead can be released into the environment constituting an environmental and worker health hazard. Depending on the age of structures, LBP can be either exposed or covered over with other paints or materials as a result of subsequent renovation. Flaking or peeling paint that could be lead-based should be removed or encapsulated appropriately.

Federal law, 20 CFR Part 35 and 40 CFR Part 745, requires sellers or lessors of residential units constructed prior to 1978, except housing for the elderly or persons with disabilities (unless any child who is less than six years of age resides or is expected to reside in such housing) or any zero-bedroom dwelling to disclose and provide a copy of a Lead Risk Assessment Report to new purchasers or lessees before they become obligated under a lease or sales contract. Property owners and sellers are also required to distribute an educational pamphlet approved by the USEPA and include standard warning language in sales contracts or in or attached to lease contracts to ensure that parents have the information they need to protect children from LBP hazards.

Information provided by the USCG indicates that a LBP inspection and risk assessment has not been previously conducted at the Site. Based on the age of the Site, it is possible that LBP was used for painting the interior and/or exterior walls of the structure. Therefore, Amec Foster Wheeler completed a LBP Inspection and Risk Assessment during the Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities. The objective of the LBP inspection was to determine where LBP exists on the property and the concentration on each painted surface.

Amec Foster Wheeler obtained 160 (including five calibration tests) test readings on interior and exterior coated surfaces. This testing was conducted on October 4, 2016, by Ms. Hope Mariska using Chapter 7 of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 revision), to document whether lead-based coatings were present. Lead was present at all but four of the 155 tested locations; however, no locations had lead concentrations at or above the USEPA/HUD definition of lead based paint (at or above 1.0 mg/cm2). The remaining tested component coatings were below the detection limit of the instrument. The painted surfaces appeared to be in good condition with no peeling or flaking. The risk assessment concluded that a LBP hazard is not present. The LBP Inspection and Risk Assessment report is included in Appendix C.



5.0 LEAD IN SOIL SAMPLING OVERVIEW

Prior to the late 1970s many paints contained lead. When these paints become damaged, i.e., peeling or flaking, or the painted surface is renovated or demolished, lead can be released into the environment constituting an environmental and worker health hazard. Depending on the age of structures, LBP may exist, either exposed or covered over with other paints or materials as a result of subsequent renovation. Flaking or peeling paint that could be lead-based should be removed or encapsulated appropriately. Based on the age of the Site, it is possible that LBP was used for painting the interior and exterior walls of the structures.

In accordance with the Scope of Work (SOW), Amec Foster Wheeler collected two soil samples per exterior structure wall. Soil sample locations were within five feet (drip line) of each exterior wall. A total of eight soil samples were collected. At each location, samples were collected at the surface (zero inches below ground surface [bgs]) and six inches bgs. The samples were containerized and shipped under standard chain of custody procedures to CT Laboratories, Inc. located in Baraboo, Wisconsin for total lead analysis by USEPA SW-846 Method 6010C.

Following receipt of the analytical laboratory report, Amec Foster Wheeler compared the soil analytical results to the USEPA Residential Direct Contact Clean up Level Criterion of 400 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ppm), and the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) Environmental Action Level (EAL) of 200 ppm. Soil analytical results indicate that lead was detected in concentrations ranging between 4.8 mg/kg and 113 mg/kg, which do not exceed the applicable USEPA or HDOH residential criteria. The Lead in Soil sampling report is included in Appendix D.



6.0 MOLD SAMPLING OVERVIEW

According to USEPA, molds are part of the natural environment, but mold growth should be avoided indoors. Molds have the potential to cause health problems and produce allergens, irritants, and in some cases potentially toxic substances. Inhaling or touching mold or mold spores may cause allergic reactions in sensitive individuals.

Direct microscopic examination tape lift samples were collected via an acid free bio tape in all suspect mold areas. Bio tape samples were shipped to Quantem Laboratories in Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

There are no USEPA Residential Regional Screening Level (RSL) or HDOH guidance for mold concentrations. Mold was detected in samples collected from the exterior of all five housing units; however, mold was not detected in the interior of any of the housing units; therefore, indoor air quality is not adversely affected.

The mold sampling report is included in Appendix E.



7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND NEPA DATA GATHERINGOVERVIEW

Analysis of the potential effects of federal actions is required pursuant to the NEPA of 1969 (42U.S. Code [USC] §4321 et seq.) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508). During a NEPA analysis, all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and requirements are considered that could apply to the federal action. CEQ regulations encourage federal agencies to integrate all of the required environmental reviews into the environmentaldocuments that are prepared pursuant to NEPA. Other environmental reviews may include statutory requirements set forth under the Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 USC §1531 et seq.), NHPA (16 USC 470 et seq.), Executive Orders (EOs), or other federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

CEQ regulations further require intergovernmental notifications prior to making any detailed statement of environmental impacts, and EO 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs) requires federal agencies to cooperate with and consider state and local views and comments in implementing a federal proposal. Consideration of the views and information of all interested persons promotes open communication and enables better decision-making.

The USCG is proposing to sell five housing units comprising approximately 0.93 acres of land at 36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi Place in Hilo, HI (Site). To support the development of the USCG’s NEPA analysis and to ensure compliance with other statutory requirements related to special status species and habitat, wetlands, floodplains, and historical and cultural resources on or in the vicinity of the Site, a desktop review of these resource areas was conducted for this action.

The Environmental Information and NEPA Data Gathering Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017 includes a summary of applicable statutory requirements that pertain to special status species and habitat, wetlands, floodplains, and historical and cultural resources, and provides a description of the existing conditions within and in the vicinity of the Site in Hilo, Hawaii based on the review of available information from the USCG and other agencies as well as the site visit. No agency consultation under Section 7 of the ESA or Section 106 of the NHPA was conducted as part of the data gathering process. However, data was solicited from agencies as appropriate to gather the necessary environmental information.

Special Status Species and Habitat

There are 77 federally listed wildlife species and 423 federally listed plant species identified within the State of Hawaii. However, of the federally listed species known to occur within the State of Hawaii, based on habitat requirements, range, and geography, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning, and Conservation System (IPaC) system did not identify any federally listed species with the potential to occur within the Site.



The USFWS IPaC system also identified six migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act that could potentially nest in the vegetation on or near the Site. A complete list of species obtained from USFWS IPaC System for initial scoping purposes is included in the Environmental Information and NEPA Data Gathering Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017.

The following state listed species have been identified in Hawaii County: 72 endangered and seven threatened wildlife species, 204 wildlife species of conservation concern, 293 endangered plant species, and 92 candidate species. Based on the development of the Site and lack of native habitats as well as the surrounding residential uses, it is unlikely that any state-listed wildlife species would occur as residents within the Site.

The USFWS Critical Habitat Portal was reviewed to determine if federally designated critical habitat occurs within or in the vicinity of the site; however, the Site has been developed and surrounded by residential uses and no federally designated critical habitat occurs within or in the immediate vicinity (USFWS 2016c). Critical habitat for the Hawaiian Monk Seal (Monachus schauinslandi) is found approximately 2.7 miles northeast of the housing sites. Critical habitat for the Ha`iwale (Cyrtandra giffardii) and âakuâaku (Cyanea platyphylla), is located approximately 5.3 miles west of the Site. Additionally, because of the distance from the Site to the Pacific Ocean, it is unlikely that any activities on the Site would affect marine species.

Wetlands

The Site is located within a developed area that is surrounded by residential uses and undeveloped land to the southwest. The nearest mapped wetlands are located approximately 0.1 miles south of the Site and include riverine wetlands associated with the Alenaio Stream (USFWS 2016d).

Floodplains

The Site, along with the immediately surrounding areas, is located outside of the 100-year floodplain and mapped as Zone X unshaded, which is defined by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as an area determined to be outside 500-year floodplain. The nearest Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) floodplain is mapped as Zone X shaded, and is within the 500-year floodplain; this area is associated with the edge of Alenaio Stream. The stream itself is mapped as Zone AE, an SFHA within the 100-year floodplain. Further, Hawaii’s Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (DLNR 2016) shows that the Site is not located within a tsunami evacuation zone, nor a dam evacuation zone. No discrepancies were noted between the information from the desktop survey and the observations made during the site reconnaissance.

Historic and Cultural Resources

A historic and cultural resources record search was conducted on September 8, 2016, and did not identify any archaeological resources at or within a one-mile radius of the Site. The record



search indicated that the Site has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and that no cultural resource inventory surveys have been conducted within one mile of the Site.

No architectural resources were identified at the Site. Four architectural resources were identified within a one-mile radius of the Site. These include four historic homes, two of which are named after their former owners (the Joseph Serrao House and the John Perreira House), and two of which are referred to by their construction type (Hilo House Type 2 and Hilo House Type 3). The locations of the four dwellings were indicated in the Hilo State Historic Preservation District (SHPD) GIS (Geographic Information System) database, however, no information beyond an assigned name and Hawaii State Inventory.



8.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Amec Foster Wheeler performed Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities which include a Phase I EDDA, LBP survey, ACM survey, lead in soil sampling, mold sampling, and sensitive environmental area review, comprised of NEPA and NHPA data gathering in conformance with the scope and limitations of the Guidance for the USCG Housing Site located at 21 Honi Place, and 36, 47, 61 and 78 Mokihana Street, Hilo, Hawaii County, Hawaii. This Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Activities Report revealed the following findings relatedto potential contamination or other environmental/historic considerations in connection to the Site.

8.1 CONCLUSIONS

No RECs, as defined by ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13, were identified in connection with the Site. RECs are “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimus conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.”

The cesspool at 36 Mokihana was recently discovered to be compromised. Repairs are currently on hold.

Sampling of select building materials for asbestos was completed at the Site. Forty three (43) samples of suspect ACM were obtained during this survey. Analysis results indicate that ACM was not present above 1% in any of the building materials sampled. ACM was detected less than 1% in drywall and joint compound at 78 Mokihana Street.

The LBP inspection and risk assessment indicated that lead was not present in paint at or above the USEPA/HUD definition of LBP. The risk assessment concluded that a hazard does not exist related to LBP.

The results of soil sampling performed around the exterior of the housing unit indicated no exceedances of the USEPA Residential Soil Regional Screening Level or Hawaii Department of Health Criteria for lead in soil.

Mold was detected on the exterior of the Site structures on the covered porch areas.

While there are numerous Federal and state-listed species identified in the State of Hawaii, it is unlikely these species reside within the Site or would be affected by the property transfer due to a lack of suitable habitat within or in the immediate vicinity of the Site.

No federally designated critical habitat occurs within or in the immediate vicinity.

The Site is located within a developed area that is surrounded by residential uses and undeveloped land to the southwest. The nearest mapped wetlands are located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site and include riverine wetlands associated with the Alenaio Stream, which is located approximately 500 feet southwest of the Site.



The Site, along with the immediately surrounding areas, are mapped as Zone X unshaded. This is outside the 100-year floodplain and outside 500-year floodplain. The nearest SFHA floodplain is mapped as Zone X shaded, and is within the 500-year floodplain; this area is associated with the edge of Alenaio Stream, and is located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site. The Site is not located within a tsunami or dam evacuation zone.

The records search did not identify any archaeological resources at or within a one-mile radius of the Site. The records search indicated that the Site has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and that no cultural resource inventory surveys have been conducted within a mile of the Site.

No architectural resources were identified at the Site. Four architectural resources were identified within a one-mile radius of the Site. These include four historic homes, two of which are named after their former owners (the Joseph Serrao House and the John Perreira House), and two of which are referred to by their construction type (Hilo House Type 2 and Hilo House Type 3).

8.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the conclusions outlined above, Amec Foster Wheeler provides the following recommendations to the USCG for consideration with respect to the Site.

The cesspool at 36 Mokihana was recently discovered to be compromised. Repairs are currently on hold. The cesspool should be repaired.

Exterior surfaces should be cleaned to remove mold.

Consultation with the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division (the State Historic Preservation Office) to determine the need for archaeological investigations pursuant to state and federal regulations is recommended prior to construction-related ground disturbance.

Based on the results of ACM inspection and sampling, an Asbestos Management Plan is not necessary at this time because asbestos was not detected at concentrations greater than 1% in any samples collected from the Site. However, because ACM was detected at 78 Mokihana Street (less than 1%), if any disturbance or renovation of the ACM occurs, the building owner is required to properly communicate the ACM hazard to all employees, workers, contractors, and occupants, and manage the ACM in accordance with 29 CFR1926.1101 and the Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry, OSHA 3096.

8.3 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions of the report are professional opinions based solely upon visual site observations, and interpretations of analyses as described in this report. The opinions presented within this report apply to the site conditions existing at the time of the investigations, and interpretation of current regulations. Therefore, opinions and recommendations provided within this report might not apply to future conditions that may exist at the Site.



We declare to the best of our knowledge and belief that we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a subject property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in general conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 and attest to the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in this report.



Project No.: 32106D009 Page 8-3 June 2017Final


9.0 REFERENCES

ASTM International (ASTM). 2013. Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13.

Civilian Federal Agency Task Force (CFATF). 1998. CFATF Guide on Evaluating Environmental Liability for Property Transfers.

Corbin, A.B., 2006. Archaeological Field Inspection and Assessment of Previously Identified Features, Punahoa Mauka Parcel, Lands of Punahoa 1-2, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii(TMK 3-2-5-08: 3,2 4). Paul H. Rosendahl, Inc., Hilo, Hawaii.

Dega, M. 2000. Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Pu’ainako Street Realignment/Extension Project, Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2, South Hilo District, Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Dega, M. and L.B. Benson. 1999. Letter Report Concerning the Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Extended Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponohawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Eble, F.J., T. Denham, and J. Pantaleo. 1997. Draft Report of Supplemental Archaeological Testing Conducted Along the Proposed Alternate Alignments of Pu’ainako Street (TMK; 2-4-01), Hilo, Hawaii.

Escott, G.G., 2004. An Archaeological Inventory Survey on Approximately 288 Acres of Land for the University of Hawaii-Hilo Mauka Lands Development. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Escott, G.G., 2013. Archaeological Inventory Survey of a 4.7-Acre Parcel in Kaumana, Ponahawai Ahupua’a, South Hilo District, Hawaii Island, Hawaii [TMK: (3) 2-5-060:007]. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 1988. FEMA Flood Map Service Center -Hilo, HI. Accessed: 15 September 2016. Retrieved from: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/search

Hawaii Department of Land and Natural Resources (DLNR). 2016. Hawaii Flood Hazard Assessment Tool. Accessed: 15 September 2016. Retrieved from: http://gis.hawaiinfip.org/FHAT/

Hawaii Division of Forestry and Wildlife (DOFAW). 2016. Threatened and Endangered Plants of Hawaii. Accessed: 28 December 2016. Retrieved from: http://files.hawaii.gov/dlnr/dofaw/rules/pubs/TEplant.html

Hunt, T.L and M. McDermott, 1994. Archaeological Inventory Survey, Puainako Street Extension Project: Lands of Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponohawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai’i. Prepared for Okahara & Associates, Engineering Consultants.



Jensen, P.M. 1991. Archaeological Inventory Survey, Komohana Golf Course, Lands of Ponahawai and Punahoa 1-2, South Hilo District, Island of Hawaii (TMK: 3-2-3-44: 09). Prepared for KTA Consulting Group c/o The Keith Companies-Hawaii, 16 Shipman Street, Hilo, HI.

Kennedy, J. and D.K. Lantis, 1996. Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey and Assessment of the Piihonua-Kukuau Transmission Main & Reservoir. Archaeological Consultants of the Pacific, Hale’iwa, HI.

McDermott, M. and H. Hammatt, 2001. Addendum to: Archaeological Inventory Survey of an Approximately 20-Acre Parcel Proposed for the USDA Pacific Basin Agriculture Research Center Located Near the Intersection of Komohana and Puainako Streets, South Hilo, Hawai’i Island (TMK 2-4-01: por 122). Prepared for SSFM International, Inc.

McGerty, L. and R. Spear. 1999. Addendum to: Inventory Survey of the Pu’ainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponohawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai’i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). 2014. Hawaii: ESA Section 6 Program: NOAA Fisheries. Accessed: 14 September 2016. Retrieved from: http://www.nmfs.noaa.gov/pr/conservation/states/hawaii.htm

Robins, J. and R.L. Spear. 1996. Inventory Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponohawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai’i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Robins, J., W.R. Fortini, and R.L. Spear, 1996. An Archaeological Inventory Survey of the Proposed Mohouli Connector Road, Ahupua’a of Kukuau 1 and 2, Ponohawai, and Punahoa, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai’i Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

Sinoto, A. 1975. Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Wailuku-Alenaio Watershed Project, Hilo, Island of Hawaii. Department of Anthropology, Bernice P. Bishop Museum.

Spear, R.L. 1998. Letter Report Concerning the Archaeological Reconnaissance Survey of the Puainako Street Realignment/Extension Project Expanded Corridor, Waiakea, Kukuau 1 and 2 and Ponohawai, South Hilo District, Island of Hawai’i. Scientific Consultant Services, Inc., Honolulu, HI.

State of Hawaii. 2016. Chapter 7: Wetlands, Riparian Area, and Vegetated Treatment Systems. Accessed: 22 September 2016. Retrieved from: http://files.hawaii.gov/dbedt/op/czm/initiative/nonpoint/cnpcp_mgmt_plan_sections/III_7-Wetlands.pdf



U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2015. Listed Species Believed to or Known to Occur inHawaii. Accessed: 14 September 2016. Retrieved from: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp0/reports/species-listed-by-state-report?state=HI&status=listed

——. 2016a. IPaC: Resources - USCG Housing Units in Hilo, HI. Accessed: 14 September 2016. Retrieved from: https://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/project/LDUI5GLSIJBZJBECEPCHFSIBP4/resources

——. 2016c. ECOS Critical Habitat - Hilo, HI. Accessed: 22 September 2016. Retrieved from: http://fws.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?webmap=9d8de5e265ad4fe09893cf75b8dbfb77

——. 2016d. National Wetlands Inventory - Hilo, HI. Accessed: 15 September 2016. Retrieved from: https://www.fws.gov/wetlands/data/mapper.html

——. 2007. Bald Eagle Fact Sheet: Natural History, Ecology, and History of Recovery. Accessed: 28 December 2016. Retrieved from:https://www.fws.gov/midwest/Eagle/recovery/biologue.html

U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). 2016. USGS TNM Hydrography 2.0 Viewer. Accessed: 22 August 2016. Retrieved from: http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/nhd.html?p=nhd



FIGURES

Project No.: 32106D009June 2017Final

_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

PROJ: GSA-32106D009

US Coast Guard

Site Location MapUS Coast Guard Housing Unit

36, 47, 61, 78 Mokihana St 21 Honi Pl

Hilo, Hawaii, 96720

FIGURE 1:

Path: G:\GSA\a_MXD\USCG Housing Due Diligence Phase III 2016_32106D009\Hilo, HI\Fig 1 Hilo Hawaii.mxd

Date: December 2016

Legend_̂ Site Location

±0 2,5001,250

Feet

_̂

_̂

46850 Magellan DriveNovi, Michigan 48377(248) 926-4008

61

Honi Pl

Manu Pl

Mokihana St

36

47

78 21

PROJ: GSA-32106D009

US Coast Guard

Site Layout MapUS Coast Guard Housing Unit

36, 47, 61, 78 Mokihana St21 Honi Pl

Hilo, Hawaii 96720

FIGURE 2:


Date: December 2016

LegendApproximate Site Boundary

±0 12562.5

Feet



APPENDIX A

PHASE I EDDA REPORT


United States Coast GuardHousing Site in Hilo, HawaiiPhase I EDDA Report

FINALPhase I EDDA Report

U.S. Coast Guard Housing Site36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21

Honi PlaceHilo, Hawaii 96720


Prepared For:

United States General Services AdministrationOffice of Real Property Utilization and Disposal

1800 F Street, NWWashington, DC 20405

Prepared By:

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.46850 Magellan Drive, Suite 190

Novi, Michigan 48377

June 2017

Amec Foster Wheeler Project No: 32106D009.0004

Date of Site Visit: 4-5 October 2016




T AB L E O F C O N T E N T S

ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST................................................................................. A-III 1.0 INTRODUCTION.........................................................................................................A-1

1.1 CERCLA 120(h)(4)(A) DOCUMENTATION...................................................... A-2 1.1.1 Federal Government Records Search .................................................. A-3 1.1.2 Recorded Chain of Title Search............................................................ A-3 1.1.3 Aerial Photographs...............................................................................A-3 1.1.4 Visual Site Inspection ........................................................................... A-3 1.1.5 Adjacent Properties Inspection ............................................................. A-4 1.1.6 Adjacent Properties Records Search.................................................... A-4 1.1.7 Interviews .............................................................................................A-4

2.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION........................................................................ A-5 2.1 AREA GEOLOGY AND SOIL........................................................................... A-5 2.2 AREA HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY ............................................... A-6

3.0 SITE OWNERSHIP AND USE.....................................................................................A-7 3.1 SITE OWNERSHIP..........................................................................................A-7 3.2 SITE USE - HISTORICAL ................................................................................A-7 3.3 SITE USE - CURRENT....................................................................................A-8

4.0 SITE INSPECTION......................................................................................................A-9 4.1 SITE BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS ................................................................. A-9 4.2 UTILITY AREAS, HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING

SYSTEM........................................................................................................ A-10 4.3 DRYWELLS/STORM DRAINS....................................................................... A-10 4.4 SURFACE WATER, PITS/PONDS/LAGOONS .............................................. A-10 4.5 SURFACE STAINING.................................................................................... A-10 4.6 STRESSED VEGETATION............................................................................ A-11 4.7 STORAGE TANKS ........................................................................................ A-11 4.8 SITE RECORDS............................................................................................ A-11 4.9 WASTEWATER ............................................................................................. A-11 4.10 ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT.................................... A-11 4.11 PESTICIDE AND HERBICIDE USE............................................................... A-11 4.12 INDOOR AIR ................................................................................................. A-12 4.13 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS.......................................................................... A-12 4.14 LEAD-BASED PAINT..................................................................................... A-12 4.15 LEAD IN SOIL................................................................................................ A-13 4.16 ASBESTOS ................................................................................................... A-13

5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW........................................................................................... A-14 5.1 RECORDS REVIEW...................................................................................... A-14

5.1.1 Site..................................................................................................... A-18 5.1.2 Surrounding Areas ............................................................................. A-18 5.1.3 Local Records .................................................................................... A-18

6.0 ADJACENT AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES ..................................................... A-19 6.1 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES-CURRENT ................................................... A-19

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC A-iJune 2017Final


6.2 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES-HISTORICAL ............................................... A-19

7.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT....................................... A-20 7.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ........................................................................... A-20 7.2 HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT................ A-20

8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND NEPA DATA GATHERING....................... A-21

9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS.......................................................... A-24 9.1 CONCLUSIONS............................................................................................. A-24 9.2 RECOMMENDATIONS.................................................................................. A-25 9.3 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................ A-25

T AB L E S

Table 1 Summary of Site InformationTable 2 Tax Assessment InformationTable 3 Environmental EDR® Report SummaryTable 4 Environmental EDR® Map Finding Summary

F I G U R E S

Figure 1 Site Location MapFigure 2 Site Layout Map

A T T A C H M E N T S

Attachment A Selected Phase I EDDA Site PhotographsAttachment B Environmental Data Resources, Inc. Report with GeoCheckAttachment C User QuestionnaireAttachment D Chain of Title ReportAttachment E Aerial PhotographsAttachment F Historical Topographic MapsAttachment G Certified Sanborn Map ReportAttachment H Historical City DirectoriesAttachment I Hawaii County Tax Assessment Information

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC A-iiJune 2017Final


ACRONYM AND ABBREVIATION LIST

ACM Asbestos Containing MaterialAmec Foster Wheeler Amec Foster Wheeler Environment & Infrastructure, Inc.AST Above ground storage tankASTM American Society for Testing and Materialsamsl above mean sea level

bgs below ground surface

CERCLA Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act

CEQ Council on Environmental QualityCFATF Civilian Federal Agency Task ForceCFR Code of Federal Regulations

EAL Environmental Action LevelEDDA Environmental Due Diligence AuditEDR® Environmental Data Resources, Inc.EO Executive OrderESA Endangered Species Act

FEMA Federal Emergency Management Agency

GSA General Services AdministrationGuidance Guide on Evaluating Environmental Liability for Property Transfers

HDOH Hawaii Department of HealthHELCO Hawaii Electric Light CompanyHUD Housing and Urban Development

IPaC USFWS’ Information, Planning, and Conservation System

LBP lead-based paint

mg/cm2 milligram per square centimetermg/kg milligram per kilogram

NCSS National Cooperative Soil SurveyNEPA National Environmental Policy Act

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC A-iiiJune 2017Final


NHPA National Historic Preservation Act

PCB polychlorinated biphenylpCi/L picocuries per literppm parts per millionPVC polyvinyl chloride

REC Recognized Environmental Condition

SFHA Special Flood Hazard AreaSHPD State Historic Preservation DistrictSIHP State Inventory of Historic PlacesSite 36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78

Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi Place, Hilo, Hawaii 96720SOW Scope of Work

U.S. United StatesUSC United States CodeUSCG United States Coast GuardUSDA United States Department of AgricultureUSEPA U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyUSFWS United States Fish and Wildlife ServiceUSGS U.S. Geological SurveyUST underground storage tank

Project No.: 32106D009 TOC A-ivJune 2017Final


1.0 INTRODUCTION

Amec Foster Wheeler Environment and Infrastructure, Inc. (Amec Foster Wheeler) was retained by the United States (U.S.) General Services Administration (GSA) to perform a Phase I Environmental Due Diligence Audit (EDDA) for the United States Coast Guard (USCG) Housing Site located at 21 Honi Place, and 36, 47, 61, and 78 Mokihana Street, Hilo, Hawaii (Site)(Figure 1). Amec Foster Wheeler was authorized to conduct this Phase I EDDA Activity under the U.S. GSA Contract Number GS-10F-0230J / GS-00P-14-CY-A-0003 and Order Number GS-P-00-16-CY-7127. Amec Foster Wheeler’s representative Ms. Hope Mariska performed the Site visit on October 4-5, 2016. Access to the Site was granted by Mr. Mark Marini, Environmental Engineer, USCG. It is Amec Foster Wheeler’s understanding that the USCG has performed these environmental activities in preparation for divestiture of the property.

This EDDA was performed in general accordance with the Civilian Federal Agency Task Force (CFATF) Guide on Evaluating Environmental Liability for Property Transfers, dated August 1998 (Guidance), the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process E 1527-13was used as a reference for conducting the EDDA, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) as detailed in Section 120(h)(4)(A)(i) to (vii).

As specified under these standards, certain responsibilities lie with the “user” of the assessment.The “user” is defined as the party who intends to use the Guidance to perform an assessment.The “user” is generally the purchaser, owner, lender, property manager, or potential tenant, and, for the purposes of this project, is considered to be the U.S. GSA. Under the Guidance, it is the responsibility of the “user” to verify whether any environmental liens exist with regard to the property, and provide this information to the environmental professional preparing the assessment. Additionally, the “user” must make the professional aware of any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to identifying environmental liability concerns in connection with the property.

In conducting this assessment, Amec Foster Wheeler’s work was performed consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing in the same locality under similar conditions. Information provided to Amec Foster Wheeler by client representatives and site contacts has been accepted in good faith and is assumed to be accurate unless written documentation or visual observations were contradictory. Amec Foster Wheeler’s findings are based on observations and data collected at one point in time. Assessment results are based upon conditions and operations at the time of the site visit. A change in any of these factors may alter the findings and conclusions expressed by Amec Foster Wheeler.

A Phase I EDDA, by nature, is limited in its ability to fully assess potential environmental liabilities or concerns associated with a property. Further investigation would be required to identify potential environmental liabilities that may be present at the Site, but were beyond detection by performance of the scope of the Phase I EDDA. State and Federal laws and regulations, if

Project No.: 32106D009 Page A-1June 2017Final


referenced in this report, are provided for informational purposes and should not be construed as legal opinion or recommendation.

This Phase I EDDA was completed under the direction of Amec Foster Wheeler’s client, the U.S. GSA, for use by the U.S. GSA and the USCG. The Phase I EDDA was prepared in accordance with the Guidance. By definition, a Phase I EDDA consists of a limited records search and site visit to identify potential environmental issues at the Site. To completely delineate any potential environmental issue at the Site, further work beyond the scope of a Phase I EDDA might be necessary. Use of this report by any parties other than Amec Foster Wheeler, the U.S. GSA, and USCG is expressly prohibited.

Amec Foster Wheeler’s scope of services for the Phase I EDDA consisted of the following activities:

Review certain federal and state regulatory agency databases for the Site and properties within a 1/8 to one-mile radius around the Site;

Review and evaluate readily available historical records, including topographical maps, historical aerial photographs, and historical fire insurance maps;

Research information publicly available and reasonably ascertainable to determine site usage since first development, or 1940, whichever is earlier;

Contact various city and/or county agencies for environmental information pertaining to the Site;

Conduct site reconnaissance to evaluate current site conditions and note visual evidence of recognized environmental conditions (RECs);

Conduct visual reconnaissance of properties within 1/2 mile of the Site;

Interview people with significant knowledge of the Site;

Review and detail the sources of information outlined in CERCLA 120(h)(4)(A)(i)-(vii);

Identify any RECs as defined by ASTM 1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; and,

Prepare this report summarizing Amec Foster Wheeler’s findings.

1.1 CERCLA 120(h)(4)(A) DOCUMENTATION

This Phase I EDDA conforms with the CERCLA 120(h)(4)(A) requirements “Identification of Uncontaminated Property”. This identification was based on an investigation of the property to determine or discover the obviousness of the presence or likely presence of a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or any petroleum product or its derivatives, including aviation fuel and motor oil, on the real property. The identification consisted of a review of each of the following sources of information concerning the current and previous uses of the real property as detailed in the following sections.



1.1.1 Federal Government Records Search

Amec Foster Wheeler contracted Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR)® to complete a detailed search of federal government records pertaining to the Site and surrounding areas. EDR®

conducted a search of federal records in accordance with the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process (E 1527-13). The Site was not identified in the State or Federal databases searched by EDR®.

Amec Foster Wheeler contacted the Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control onDecember 1, 2016 for additional information regarding the Site. There has been no response to this inquiry as of the date of this report.

1.1.2 Recorded Chain of Title Search

Amec Foster Wheeler contracted EDR® to complete a detailed chain of title search. According to the EDR® Chain of Title search, USCG purchased all five housing units from Francis Clayton Coxand Kenneth B. Griffin on February 24, 1975. Prior to that time it appeared that they were ownedby private citizens. In addition, no environmental liens or activity use limitations are associatedwith the Site.

1.1.3 Aerial Photographs

Amec Foster Wheeler contracted EDR® to obtain historical aerial photographs for the Site. Six aerial photographs of the property were obtained from EDR® dated 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1992,and 2000. The Site appeared undeveloped in the 1954 aerial photograph. All five houses were present by the 1975 photograph and were noted consistent to their current condition in the 1985, 1992 and 2000 aerial photographs.

1.1.4 Visual Site Inspection

Amec Foster Wheeler conducted a physical site inspection on October 4-5, 2016. All five houses were observed to be one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family homes constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. Flooring was hardwood or vinyl tile throughout the homes. All five houses were constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick, with a metal roof. A concrete driveway was present, with a carport at all five houses. The five lots included a back yard with a storage shed. Electricity was provided to all five houses by the Hawaii Electric Light Company (HELCO). Potable water connections were provided by the Hawaii Department of Water Supply. Waste water at each of the five houses was treated in an on-site cesspool.

The property located at 21 Honi Place was an approximate 1,500 square foot house. The home appeared to be undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection. Small areas of stressed vegetation were observed on the south side of the lot. This did not appear to be an environmental concern.



The property located at 36 Mokihana Street was an approximately 1,400 square foot house. Small areas of stressed vegetation were observed on the north and west sides of the house. This did not appear to be an environmental concern; rather, it appeared to be related to construction occurring in those areas.

The property located at 47 Mokihana Street was an approximately 1,500 square foot house.

The property located at 61 Mokihana Street was an approximately 1,400 square foot house. The home appeared to be in undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection.

The property located at 78 Mokihana Street was an approximately 1,400 square foot house. The home appeared to be in undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection.

No environmental concerns were noted during the site reconnaissance.

1.1.5 Adjacent Properties Inspection

Amec Foster Wheeler completed a visual inspection of the adjacent properties during the Site investigation. The surrounding buildings in the vicinity of the Site are single-family residential structures. Amec Foster Wheeler completed a visual inspection of the exteriors of the surrounding properties and did not observe any apparent environmental concerns.

1.1.6 Adjacent Properties Records Search

In addition to the federal databases searched by EDR®, several state databases are also searched as a general practice. No sites within a 0.5-mile radius of the Site were identified on State or Federal database lists searched by EDR®.

1.1.7 Interviews

The houses located at 21 Honi Place, 36 Mokihana Street, and 41 Mokihana Street were unoccupied at the time of the site inspection. The houses located at the 61 and 78 Mokihana Street were tenant occupied. Amec Foster Wheeler interviewed Mr. Andrew Noell, Local Housing Officer, USCG on October 11, 2016. Mr. Noell answered questions regarding the Site to the best of his knowledge and indicated that he was unaware of environmental concerns at the Site.



2.0 SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION

The Site is located at 21 Honi Place, and 36, 47, 61, and 78 Mokihana Street in Hawaii County,Hilo, Hawaii (Figure 1). Figure 2 shows the site layout. The Site is located in a Residential Zoned Area. Table 1 below summarizes the site information. Copies of select site photographs are included in Attachment A.

Table 1: Summary of Site Information

Address Year BuiltUnit Size(square

feet)

Lot Size(acre)

Unit Description Occupied

21 Honi Place Approx. 1975

Approx. 1,500 0.2083


houseNo


Approx. 1,400 0.2043


houseNo


Approx. 1,500 0.2329


houseNo


Approx. 1,400 0.1791


houseYes


Approx. 1,400 0.184


houseYes

2.1 AREA GEOLOGY AND SOIL

Amec Foster Wheeler conducted a search of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Soil Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey (NCSS) Web Soil Survey database system as well as available regional geological survey documentation. The geology at Hilo consists of volcanic ash underlain by basalt flows from the volcanos that formed the Island of Hawaii.

Surface soils were not inspected during site reconnaissance because of the vegetation coverage. The USDA Soil Survey of Hilo describes the soil as lava flows and pahoehoe (bedrock) and keaukaha muck. The pahoehoe is excessively drained, with slow infiltration rates. The Keaukaha muck is well drained soil with a very slow infiltration rate. A typical soil profile is as follows: 0-7inches muck, 7-59 inches is bedrock. The information obtained from Geocheck® is included in Attachment B.



2.2 AREA HYDROLOGY AND HYDROGEOLOGY

The Site is located about two miles southwest of Hilo Bay. Based on surface topography, groundwater flow in the area is generally to the northeast, toward Hilo Bay.



3.0 SITE OWNERSHIP AND USE

Information pertaining to the historical nature of the Site was obtained through Mr. Andrew Noell,Local Housing Officer, USCG. A copy of the user questionnaire completed by Mr. Noell onOctober 11, 2016 is included in Attachment C.

3.1 SITE OWNERSHIP

According to the EDR® Chain of Title search, USCG purchased the property from Francis Clayton Cox and Kenneth B. Griffin on February 24, 1975. Prior to that time it appears to have been held by private citizens. USCG has used the Site for personnel housing from purchase until the present. The Chain of Title search is included in Attachment D.

3.2 SITE USE - HISTORICAL

General information regarding the historical use of the Site was obtained from a review of available historical documents and interviews with USCG personnel. According to historical information, the Site was developed with the residences in approximately 1975. Prior to that time, the Site was undeveloped.

Historical documents reviewed to gather information about historical site use include:

Historical aerial photographs;

Historical topographic maps;

Historical Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps;

Historical City Directories; and

Other historical information provided by the USCG and U.S. GSA.

Historical Aerial Photographs

Amec Foster Wheeler contracted EDR® to obtain historical aerial photographs for the Site. Copies of the aerial photographs are included in Attachment E. Six aerial photographs of the property were obtained from EDR® dated 1954, 1975, 1977, 1985, 1992, and 2000. The Site appeared undeveloped in the 1954 aerial photograph. All five houses were present by the 1975 photograph and were noted similar to current conditions in the 1985, 1992 and 2000 aerial photographs.

Historical Topographic Maps

Six historical United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps were obtained from EDR®. The maps, dated 1917, 1932, 1963, 1981, 1995/1997, and 2013 are included in Attachment F. The maps are USGS 7.5-minute maps (with the exception of 1917 and 1932,which are 15-minute maps) from the TP Hilo and W Piihonua map sheets. The 1963, 1981, 1995/1997, and 2013 maps indicate that the Site is located between 450 and 500 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The 1917 and 1932 maps indicate the Site is approximately 500 feet amsl.



Historical Fire Insurance Maps

Historical Fire Insurance Maps were requested from EDR®; however, coverage was not available for the Site. The No Coverage notice is included in Attachment G.

Historical City Directories

Historical City Directories were obtained from EDR®. The Cole Information Services directory was searched for the following years; 1992, 1995, 1999, 2003, 2008, and 2013. An occupant was identified for each year listed. The search results are included in Attachment H.

3.3 SITE USE - CURRENT

The Site is currently occupied by the USCG and is developed with single-family homes. The Site is currently awaiting divestiture.



4.0 SITE INSPECTION

This section describes general site observations from the October 4-5, 2016 site reconnaissance.Photographs of selected site features were taken during the site visit. Copies of select site photographs are included in Attachment A.

4.1 SITE BUILDINGS AND GROUNDS

The Site is located at 21 Honi Place, 36, 47, 61 and 78 Mokihana Street, Hawaii County,Hawaii (Figure 1). The USCG intends to divest of the Site; therefore, it has been assessed for this Phase I EDDA. Property information from the County of Hawaii Real Property Tax Office is summarized in Table 2.

Table 2: Tax Assessment Information

Address Year BuiltLot Size(acre)

Parcel Number

21 Honi Place Approx. 1975 0.2083 250480290000

36 Mokihana Street Approx. 1975 0.2043 250480430000




A copy of the assessment information is included in Attachment I. Figure 2 shows the property layout.

At the time of the site reconnaissance, the property at 21 Honi Place was observed to be a one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family home constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. The approximately 1,500 square foot house was constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick and a metal roof. Flooring was hardwood and vinyl tile. The house was undergoing renovations at the time of the site inspection. A concrete driveway was present with a two-car carport. The lot included a back yard with a storage shed.

The property at 36 Mokihana Street was observed to be a one-story, three-bedroom, two-bath single family home constructed on a slab-on-grade foundation. The approximately 1,400 square foot house was constructed with wood framing, with an exterior consisting of vinyl siding and brick and a metal roof. Flooring was hardwood and vinyl tile. A concrete driveway was present with a two-car carport. The lot included a back yard with a storage shed.






4.2 UTILITY AREAS, HEATING, VENTILATING AND AIR CONDITIONING SYSTEM

Electricity is provided by HELCO via underground cables. Forced air heating and air conditioning systems are not provided at the Site. Potable water is supplied by the Hawaii Department of Water Supply. Natural gas is not provided at the Site. Photovoltaic cells are mounted on the roof to provide energy to power hot water heaters.

4.3 DRYWELLS/STORM DRAINS

A storm drainage ditch was observed during the site visit along the Honi Place and MokihanaStreet. The property at 21 Honi Place has a grate along the north side of the house which drains to underground polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipes extending under the house.

4.4 SURFACE WATER, PITS/PONDS/LAGOONS

Surface water, pits, ponds or lagoons were not observed during site reconnaissance.

4.5 SURFACE STAINING

Surface staining was not apparent on walls, ceilings, or floors during site reconnaissance.



4.6 STRESSED VEGETATION

Stressed vegetation was observed at 21 Honi Place, in the yard near the south side of the house, and at 36 Mokihana Street on the west side of the house. Both areas of stressed vegetation appeared to be due to construction and repair activity around the cesspools in both yards and is not believed to constitute an environmental concern. No areas of stressed vegetation were observed at 47, 61 or 78 Mokihana Street.

4.7 STORAGE TANKS

No underground storage tanks (USTs) or aboveground storage tanks (ASTs) were observed during site reconnaissance. According to historical documentation, neither USTs nor ASTs were used at or associated with the Site.

4.8 SITE RECORDS

Limited records were available to Amec Foster Wheeler during completion of this Phase I EDDA.Records reviewed are discussed in pertinent sections of this report.

4.9 WASTEWATER

All five houses have cesspools. According to Mr. Noell, the cesspool at 36 Mokihana was recently discovered to be compromised. The area was covered and fenced and plans were made to repair the cesspool. When it was made known that the properties were slated for divestiture, the repairs were stopped. All other septic fields and cesspools were observed to be in good condition.

4.10 ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS AND EQUIPMENT

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Title 40, Part 761, governs the manufacturing, processing and distribution of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The guideline defines a PCB transformer as any transformer that contains 500 parts per million (ppm) PCBs. PCB-Contaminated Electrical Equipment is defined as “any electrical equipment including, but not limited to, transformers (including those used in railway locomotives and self-propelled cars), capacitors, circuit breakers, reclosers, voltage regulators, switches (including sectionalizers and motor starters), electromagnets, and cable, that contains PCBs at concentrations of 50 ppm and < 500 ppm in the contaminating fluid.”

Electricity is supplied to the Site by HELCO. No transformers were observed at any of the five properties.

4.11 PESTICIDE AND HERBICIDE USE

During site reconnaissance, pesticides and herbicides were not observed at the Site. According to Mr. Noell, Terminex is under contract for termite control at all five homes. The amount of



material used at the Site is in accordance with general residential applications for termite control and, as such, are not anticipated to represent an environmental concern at the Site.

4.12 INDOOR AIR

Mold

Mold was observed in the porch rafters at 21 Honi Place, 47, 61 and 78 Mokihana Street. Mold was observed at 36 Mokihana Street on the external wooden supports near the living room window. One tape lift mold sample was collected from the exterior of each of the houses. No indoor mold was observed during the Site reconnaissance. The full Mold report, including sampling results, is included in the Mold Sampling Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated April 2017.

No potential dust or material that might affect the indoor air quality was observed during Site reconnaissance.

Radon Gas

Radon gas is a colorless, odorless gas that occurs naturally from the breakdown of uranium.Radon can be found in high concentrations where there are soils and rocks containing high levels of uranium, granite, shale or phosphate. In open air or in areas with high air circulation, radon is not considered a health problem. However, in confined spaces (such as poorly ventilated basements), radon can concentrate and become a health hazard.

The USEPA has classified Hawaii County as being located within the USEPA Radon Zone 3, with indoor average radon levels of less than 2 picocuries per Liter (pCi/L) (EDR® 2016). Forty three (43) residences in the zip code 96720 were tested, with a maximum radon level of 0.112 pCi/L (EDR® 2016).

The USEPA Radon threshold value for radon in indoor air is 4 pCi/L. Because radon concentrations in the area are typically below the USEPA threshold value, and the absence of a basement at the properties, radon is not expected to be a concern at the properties.

4.13 RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS

USCG personnel were not aware of permitted radiological activities or materials at Site. There is not information indicating radioactive materials use or storage within the neighboring properties.Therefore, radioactive materials are not a concern associated with this Site.

4.14 LEAD-BASED PAINT

Based on the age of the housing unit, it is possible that Lead-Based Paint (LBP) was used for painting the interior and exterior walls of the structure. As such, Amec Foster Wheeler performed



a LBP survey on October 4-5, 2016. The objective of the LBP inspection was to determine if and where LBP exists on the property and the concentration of each painted surface.

Amec Foster Wheeler obtained 160 (including five calibration tests) test readings on interior and exterior coated surfaces using Chapter 7 of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1997 revision), to document whether lead-based coatings were present.

The LBP inspection indicated that, out of the 160 tested locations, no locations had lead concentrations at or above the USEPA/HUD definition of lead-based paint (at or above 1.0 milligrams per square centimeter [mg/cm2]). The painted surfaces appeared to be in good condition with no peeling or flaking. The risk assessment concluded that a LBP hazard is not present. The inspection report, findings, and recommendations are included in the Lead-Based Inspection and Risk Assessment Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017.

4.15 LEAD IN SOIL

As part of the LBP inspection and risk assessment, and in accordance with the Scope of Work (SOW), Amec Foster Wheeler collected two soil samples per exterior structure wall located within five feet (drip line) of the wall. A total of forty soil samples were collected, eight at each property. Samples were collected at the surface (zero inches below ground surface [bgs]) and six inches bgs at each location. The samples were containerized and shipped under standard chain of custody procedures to CT Laboratories, Inc. located in Baraboo, Wisconsin. The samples were submitted for total lead analysis by USEPA SW-846 Method 6010C.

Following receipt of the analytical laboratory report, Amec Foster Wheeler compared the soil analytical results to the USEPA Residential Direct Contact Clean up Level Criterion of 400 milligram per kilogram (mg/kg) (ppm), and the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH) Environmental Action Level (EAL) of 200 ppm. Soil analysis results indicate that lead was detected in concentrations ranging between 4.8 mg/kg and 113 mg/kg, which do not exceed the applicable USEPA or HDOH residential criteria. The sampling results, findings, and recommendations are included in the Lead in Soil Sampling Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017.

4.16 ASBESTOS

An Asbestos Containing Material (ACM) survey was performed by Amec Foster Wheeler on October 4-5, 2016. Material samples were collected from forty two (42) locations throughout the property. Asbestos was detected below 1% in three of the samples collected from 78 Mokihana Street. Asbestos was not detected in any of the other properties. The full ACM report, including sampling results, is included in the Asbestos Containing Material Survey Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017.



5.0 REGULATORY REVIEW

5.1 RECORDS REVIEW

Various State and Federal lists that identify properties with confirmed or possible contamination, facilities that generate hazardous waste, sites with USTs, and properties involved in Federal enforcement actions were reviewed to assess the environmental status of the Site. Table 2presents a summary of the information EDR® provided for the Site. The complete Environmental EDR® Report is provided in Attachment B.

Table 2. Environmental EDR® Report Summary

Database Search Reference

EDR® Search Radius Subject Site Surrounding/Adjoining

PropertiesNPL 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedProposed NPL 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedNPL LIENS TP Not Requested 0 ListedDelisted NPL 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedFEDERAL FACILITY 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedSEMS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedSEMS-ARCHIVE 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedCORRACTS 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedRCRA-TSDF 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedRCRA-LQG 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedRCRA-SQG 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedRCRA-CESQG 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedLUCIS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedUS ENG CONTROLS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedUS INST CONTROL 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedERNS TP Not Requested 0 ListedSHWS 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedSWF/LF 0.5 Not Listed 0 ListedINDIAN LUST 0.5 Not Listed 0 ListedOCPCASES 0.5 Not Listed 0 ListedHIST LUST 0.5 Not Listed 0 ListedFEMA UST 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedUST 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedAST 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedINDIAN UST 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedENG CONTROLS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedINST CONTROL 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedVCP 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedINDIAN VCP 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedBROWNFIELDS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedUS BROWNFIELDS 0.50 Not Listed 0 Listed





PropertiesSWRCY 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedINDIAN ODI 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedODI 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedDEBRIS REGION 9 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedUS HIST CDL TP Not Requested 0 ListedUS CDL TP Not Requested 0 ListedHIST UST 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedLIENS 2 TP Not Requested 0 ListedHMIRS TP Not Requested 0 ListedSPILLS 90 TP Not Requested 0 ListedRCRA NonGen / NLR 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedFUDS 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedDOD 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedSCRD DRYCLEANERS 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedUS FIN ASSUR TP Not Requested 0 ListedEPA WATCH LIST TP Not Requested 0 Listed2020 COR ACTION 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedTSCA TP Not Requested 0 ListedTRIS TP Not Requested 0 ListedSSTS TP Not Requested 0 ListedROD 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedRMP TP Not Requested 0 ListedRAATS TP Not Requested 0 ListedPRP TP Not Requested 0 ListedPADS TP Not Requested 0 ListedICIS TP Not Requested 0 ListedFTTS TP Not Requested 0 ListedMLTS TP Not Requested 0 ListedCOAL ASH DOE TP Not Requested 0 ListedCOAL ASH EPA 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedPCB TRANSFORMER TP Not Requested 0 ListedRADINFO TP Not Requested 0 ListedHIST FTTS TP Not Requested 0 ListedDOT OPS TP Not Requested 0 ListedCONSENT 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedINDIAN RESERV 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedFUSRAP 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedUMTRA 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedLEAD SMELTERS TP Not Requested 0 ListedUS AIRS TP Not Requested 0 ListedUS MINES 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedFINDS TP Not Requested 0 ListedDOCKET HWC TP Not Requested 0 Listed





PropertiesUXO 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedAIRS TP Not Requested 0 ListedCOAL ASH 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedDRYCLEANERS 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedFinancial Assurance TP Not Requested 0 ListedLEAD TP Not Requested 0 ListedLRP 0.50 Not Listed 0 ListedNPDES TP Not Requested 0 ListedUIC TP Not Requested 0 ListedECHO TP Not Requested 0 ListedFUELS PROGRAM 0.25 Not Listed 0 ListedEDR MGP 1.00 Not Listed 0 ListedEDR Hist Auto 0.13 Not Listed 0 ListedEDR Hist Cleaner 0.13 Not Listed 0 ListedRGA HWS TP Not Requested 0 ListedRGA LF TP Not Requested 0 ListedRGA LUST TP Not Requested 0 Listed

Notes:2020 COR ACTION=2020 Corrective Action Program ListAIRS=Permit Contact ListAST=Aboveground Storage TanksBROWNFIELDS=Petroleum Brownfields Program SitesCOAL ASH DOE=Steam-Electric Plant Operation DataCOAL ASH USEPA=Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments ListCOAL ASH=Coal Ash Disposal Site ListingCONSENT=Superfund (CERCLA) Consent DecreesCORRACTS=Corrective Action ReportDEBRIS REGION 9=Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site LocationsDelisted NPL=National Priority List DeletionsDOCKET HWC=Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket ListingDOD=Department of Defense SitesDOT OPS=Incident and Accident DataDRYCLEANERS=Registered Drycleaning FacilitiesECHO=Enforcement and Compliance History InformationEDR MGP=EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas PlantsEDR US Hist Auto Stat=EDR Exclusive Historic Gas StationsEDR US Hist Cleaners=EDR Exclusive Historic Dry CleanersENG CONTROLS=Engineering Controls Site ListingEPA WATCH LIST=EPA WATCH LISTERNS=Emergency Response Notification SystemFEDERAL FACILITY=Federal Facility Site Information listingFEMA UST=Underground Storage Tank ListingFinancial Assurance=Financial Assurance Information Listing



FINDS=Facility Index System/Facility Registry SystemFTTS=FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)FUDS=Formerly Used Defense SitesFUELS PROGRAM=EPA Fuels Program Registered ListingFUSRAP=Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action ProgramHIST FTTS=FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case ListingHIST LUST=Recovery SitesHIST UST=Historical UST Registered DatabaseHMIRS=Hazardous Materials Information Reporting SystemICIS=Integrated Compliance Information SystemINDIAN LUST=Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandINDIAN ODI=Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian LandsINDIAN RESERV=Indian ReservationsINDIAN UST=Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandINDIAN VCP=Voluntary Cleanup Priority ListingINST CONTROL=Site Remediation Section DatabaseLEAD SMELTERS=Lead Smelter SitesLEAD=Lead Inspection DatabaseLIENS 2=CERCLA Lien InformationLRP=Land Restoration ProgramLUCIS=Land Use Control Information SystemMLTS=Material Licensing Tracking SystemNPDES=National Pollutant Discharge Elimination SystemNPL LIENS=Federal Superfund Liens NPL=National Priority List OCPCASES=Oil Control Program CasesODI=Open Dump InventoryPADS=PCB Activity Database SystemPCB TRANSFORMER=PCB Transformer Registration DatabaseProposed NPL=Proposed National Priority List SitesPRP=Potentially Responsible PartiesRAATS=RCRA Administrative Action Tracking SystemRADINFO=Radiation Information DatabaseRCRA NonGen / NLR=RCRA - Non GeneratorsRCRA-CESQG=RCRA-Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorRCRA-LQG=RCRA-Large Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-SQG=RCRA-Small Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-TSDF=RCRA-Treatment, Storage and DisposalRGA HWS=Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities ListRGA LF=Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities ListRGA LUST=Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage TankRMP=Risk Management PlansROD=Records of DecisionSCRD DRYCLEANERS=State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners ListingSEMS=Superfund Enterprise Management SystemSEMS-ARCHIVE=Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive



SHWS=Superfund Site Information ListingSPILLS=Spills DatabaseSSTS=Section 7 Tracking SystemsSWF/LF=Permitted Solid Waste Disposal FacilitiesSWRCY=Recycling FacilitiesTP=Target PropertyTRIS=Toxic Chemical Release Inventory SystemTSCA=Toxic Substances Control ActUIC=Underground Injection Wells DatabaseUMTRA=Uranium Mill Tailings SitesUS AIRS=Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility SubsystemUS BROWNFIELDS=A Listing of Brownfields SitesUS CDL=Clandestine Drug LabsUS ENG CONTROLS=Engineering Controls Sites ListUS FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance InformationUS HIST CDL=National Clandestine Laboratory RegisterUS INST CONTROL=Sites with Institutional ControlsUS MINES=Mines Master Index FileUST=Underground Storage Tank DatabaseUXO=Unexploded Ordinance SitesVCP=Voluntary Cleanup Program Applicants/Participants

5.1.1 Site

The Site was not identified on the State or Federal databases searched by EDR®.

5.1.2 Surrounding Areas

No sites within a one-mile radius of the Site were identified on State or Federal database lists searched by EDR®.

5.1.3 Local Records

Amec Foster Wheeler contacted the Hawaii Office of Environmental Quality Control on December 1, 2016 for additional information regarding the Site. There has been no response to this inquiry as of the date of this report.



6.0 ADJACENT AND NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES

This section provides information on the observations made during site reconnaissance as well as history of neighboring properties to identify potential environmental impacts to the Site.

6.1 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES-CURRENT

The Site is primarily surrounded by single family homes from the north, south, east, and west.Amec Foster Wheeler observed adjacent properties from the Site as well as public roadways. No environmental concerns were observed at the time of site reconnaissance.

6.2 NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES-HISTORICAL

According to available historical documentation, the neighboring properties were residential to the north, south, east, and west since approximately 1975. Historical aerial photographs and topographic maps are included in Attachments E and F, respectively. No historical environmental concerns were noted for the neighboring properties.



7.0 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE MANAGEMENT

7.1 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS

The Site is a residential property occupied by the USCG. No hazardous material storage was observed during site reconnaissance. Evidence of hazardous material storage or use was not evident during site reconnaissance.

7.2 HAZARDOUS AND NON-HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

Based on the status of the Site as residential, no plan exists for hazardous and non-hazardous waste management. Household waste was disposed of weekly by the City of Hilo.



8.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION AND NEPA DATA GATHERING

Analysis of the potential effects of federal actions are required pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA; 42 U.S. Code [USC] §4321 et seq.) and Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) Regulations Implementing the Procedural Provisions of NEPA (40 Code of Federal Regulations [CFR] 1500-1508). During a NEPA analysis, all applicable federal, state, and local regulations and requirements are considered that could apply to the federal action. CEQ regulations encourage federal agencies to integrate all of the required environmental reviews into the environmental documents that are prepared pursuant to NEPA. Other environmental reviews may include statutory requirements set forth under the Endangered Species Act (ESA; 16 USC §1531 et seq.), National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA; 16 USC 470 et seq.), Executive Orders (EOs), or other federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

CEQ regulations further require intergovernmental notifications prior to making any detailed statement of environmental impacts, and EO 12372 (Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs), requires federal agencies to cooperate with and consider state and local views and comments in implementing a federal proposal. Consideration of the views and information of all interested persons promotes open communication and enables better decision-making.

The USCG is proposing to sell five housing units comprising approximately 0.93 acres of land at 36 Mokihana Street, 47 Mokihana Street, 61 Mokihana Street, 78 Mokihana Street, and 21 Honi Place in Hilo, HI (Site). To support the development of the USCG’s NEPA analysis and to ensure compliance with other statutory requirements related to special status species and habitat, wetlands, floodplains, and historical and cultural resources on or in the vicinity of the Site, a desktop review of these resource areas was conducted for this action.

The Environmental Information and NEPA Data Gathering Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017 includes a summary of applicable statutory requirements that pertain to special status species and habitat, wetlands, floodplains, and historical and cultural resources, and provides a description of the existing conditions within and in the vicinity of the Site in Hilo, Hawaii based on the review of available information from the USCG and other agencies as well as the site visit. No agency consultation under Section 7 of the ESA or Section 106 of the NHPA was conducted as part of the data gathering process. However, data was solicited from agencies as appropriate to gather the necessary environmental information.

Special Status Species and Habitat

There are 77 federally listed wildlife species and 423 federally listed plant species identified within the State of Hawaii. However, of the federally listed species known to occur within the State of Hawaii, based on habitat requirements, range, and geography, the US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information, Planning, and Conservation (IPaC) system did not identify any federally listed species with the potential to occur within the Site.



The USFWS IPaC system also identified six migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act that could potentially nest in the vegetation on or near the Site. A complete list of species obtained from USFWS IPaC System for initial scoping purposes is included in the Environmental Information and NEPA Data Gathering Report prepared by Amec Foster Wheeler dated June 2017.

The following state listed species have been identified in Hawaii County: 72 endangered and seven threatened wildlife species, 204 wildlife species of conservation concern, 293 endangered plant species, and 92 candidate species. Based on the development of the Site and lack of native habitats as well as the surrounding residential uses it is unlikely that any state-listed wildlife species would occur as residents within the Site.

Wetlands

The Site is located within a developed area that is surrounded by residential uses and undeveloped land to the southwest. The nearest mapped wetlands are located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site and include riverine wetlands associated with the Alenaio Stream (USFWS 2016d).

Floodplains

The Site, along with the immediately surrounding areas, are located outside of the 100-year floodplain and mapped as Zone X unshaded, which is defined by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) as an area determined to be outside the 500-year floodplain. The nearest Special Flood Hazard Area (SFHA) floodplain is mapped as Zone X shaded, and is within the 500-year floodplain; this area is associated with the edge of Alenaio Stream, which is located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site. The stream itself is mapped as Zone AE, an SFHA within the 100-year floodplain. Further, Hawaii’s Flood Hazard Assessment Tool (DLNR 2016)shows that the Site are not located within a tsunami evacuation zone, nor a dam evacuation zone. No discrepancies were noted between the information from the desktop survey and the observations made during the site reconnaissance.

Historic and Cultural Resources

A historic and cultural resources records search was conducted on September 8, 2016, and did not identify any archaeological resources at or within a one-mile radius of the Site. The recordssearch indicated that the Site has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and that no cultural resource inventory surveys have been conducted within a mile of the Site.

No architectural resources were identified at the Site. Four architectural resources were identified within a one-mile radius of the Site. These include four historic homes, two of which are named after their former owners (the Joseph Serrao House and the John Perreira House), and two of which are referred to by their construction type (Hilo House Type 2 and Hilo House Type 3). The locations of the four dwellings were indicated in the Hilo SHPD (Geographic Information System)



GIS database, however, no information beyond an assigned name and Hawaii State Inventory of Historic Places (SIHP) numbers were available for the historic structures.



9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Amec Foster Wheeler performed this Phase I EDDA in conformance with the scope and limitations of the Guidance for the USCG Housing Site located at 21 Honi Place and 36, 47, 61 and 78 Mokihana Street, Hilo, Hawaii County, Hawaii. This assessment revealed the following findings related to potential contamination or liability in connection to the Site.

9.1 CONCLUSIONS

The Phase I EDDA identified the following findings at the Site:

No RECs, as defined by ASTM Standard Practice E 1527-13, were identified in connection with the Site. RECs are “the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimus conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.”

The cesspool at 36 Mokihana was recently discovered to be compromised. Repairs are currently on hold.

Sampling of select building materials for asbestos was completed at the Site. Forty three(43) samples of suspect ACM were obtained during this survey. Analysis results indicate that ACM was not present above 1% in any of the building materials sampled. ACM was detected less than 1% in drywall and joint compound at 78 Mokihana Street.

The LBP inspection and risk assessment indicated that lead was not present in paint at or above the USEPA/HUD definition of LBP. The risk assessment concluded that a hazarddoes not exist related to LBP.

The results of soil sampling performed around the exterior of the housing unit indicated that no exceedances of USEPA Residential Soil Regional Screening Level or Hawaii Department of Health Criteria for lead in soil.

Mold was detected on the exterior of the Site structures on the covered porch areas.

While there are numerous Federal and state-listed species identified in the State of Hawaii, it is unlikely these species reside within the Site or would be affected by the property transfer due to a lack of suitable habitat within or in the immediate vicinity of the Site.

No federally designated critical habitat occurs within or in the immediate vicinity.

The Site is located within a developed area that is surrounded by residential uses and undeveloped land to the southwest. The nearest mapped wetlands are located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site and include riverine wetlands associated with the Alenaio Stream, which is located approximately 500 feet southwest of the Site.



The Site, along with the immediately surrounding areas, are mapped as Zone X unshaded. This is outside the 100-year floodplain and outside 500-year floodplain. The nearest SFHA floodplain is mapped as Zone X shaded, and is within the 500-year floodplain; this area is associated with the edge of Alenaio Stream, and is located approximately 0.1 miles southwest of the Site. The Site is not located within a tsunami or dam evacuation zone.

The records search did not identify any archaeological resources at or within a one-mile radius of the Site. The records search indicated that the Site has not been previously surveyed for cultural resources and that no cultural resource inventory surveys have been conducted within a mile of the Site.

No architectural resources were identified at the Site. Four architectural resources were identified within a one-mile radius of the Site. These include four historic homes, two of which are named after their former owners (the Joseph Serrao House and the John Perreira House), and two of which are referred to by their construction type (Hilo House Type 2 and Hilo House Type 3).

9.2 RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the conclusions outlined above, Amec Foster Wheeler recommends the following to the USCG for consideration with respect to the Site.

The cesspool at 36 Mokihana was recently discovered to be compromised. Repairs are currently on hold. The cesspool should be repaired.

Exterior surfaces should be cleaned to remove mold.

Consultation with the Hawaii State Historic Preservation Division (the State Historic Preservation Office) to determine the need for archaeological investigations pursuant to state and federal regulations is recommended prior to construction-related ground disturbance.

Based on the results of ACM inspection and sampling, an Asbestos Management Plan is not necessary at this time because asbestos was not detected at concentrations greater than 1% in any samples collected from the Site. However, because ACM was detected at 78 Mokihana Street (less than 1%), if any disturbance or renovation of the ACM occurs, the building owner is required to properly communicate the ACM hazard to all employees, workers, contractors, and occupants, and manage the ACM in accordance with 29 CFR 1926.1101 and the Asbestos Standard for the Construction Industry, OSHA 3096.

9.3 LIMITATIONS

The conclusions of the report are professional opinions based solely upon visual site observations, and interpretations of analyses as described in this report. The opinions presented within this report apply to the Site conditions existing at the time of the investigations, and



interpretation of current regulations. Therefore, opinions and recommendations provided within this report might not apply to future conditions that may exist at the Site.

We declare to the best of our knowledge and belief that we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a subject property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in general conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312 and attest to the completeness and accuracy of the information contained in this report.





FIGURES


_̂_̂

_̂_̂

_̂

PROJ: GSA-32106D009

US Coast Guard

Site Location MapUS Coast Guard Housing Unit

36, 47, 61, 78 Mokihana St 21 Honi Pl

Hilo, Hawaii, 96720

FIGURE 1:


Date: December 2016

Legend_̂ Site Location

±0 2,5001,250

Feet

_̂

_̂


61

Honi Pl

Manu Pl

Mokihana St

36

47

78 21

PROJ: GSA-32106D009

US Coast Guard

Site Layout MapUS Coast Guard Housing Unit

36, 47, 61, 78 Mokihana St21 Honi Pl

Hilo, Hawaii 96720

FIGURE 2:


Date: December 2016

LegendApproximate Site Boundary

±0 12562.5

Feet



ATTACHMENT A

SELECTED PHASE I EDDA SITE PHOTOGRAPHS


Attachment APhase I EDDA Site Photographs

Page 1 of 37

North side of house

Northwest front of house Street View, 21 Honi Place

Project No.: 32106D009(Hope Mariska, Photographer)

Phase I Environmental Due Diligence AuditSite Photographs

October 4 & 5, 2016USCG Housing Site21 Honi Place, HI


Page 2 of 37

Southeast corner of house

Stressed vegetation





Page 3 of 37

South side of house

Surface water drainage outlet





Page 4 of 37

Southern side of house




Front of house facing southeast


Page 5 of 37

Kitchen

Dining Room





Page 6 of 37

Bedroom (1)

Bedroom (2)





Page 7 of 37

Bedroom (3)

Mold in porch area





Page 8 of 37

East side of house

South side of house



October 4 & 5, 2016USCG Housing Site

36 Mokihana, HI


Page 9 of 37

Distressed Grass on the South Side of house

West side of house




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 10 of 37

Distressed vegetation on west side of property

Cesspool construction area




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 11 of 37

West side of house, showing cesspool construction area

North side of property




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 12 of 37

Kitchen

Porch




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 13 of 37

Living Room

Bedroom (1)




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 14 of 37

Bedroom (2)

Under porch roof South Eastern corner of house




36 Mokihana, HI


Page 15 of 37

Front of house facing south

East Side of house




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 16 of 37

East side of property showing storage shed

Back of house facing south




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 17 of 37

Eastern side of house

West side of property




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 18 of 37

Detached Garage south end of lot

Behind Detached garage.




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 19 of 37

Kitchen

Living room




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 20 of 37

Sun room

Mold on sunroom rafters




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 21 of 37

Bedroom (1)

Bedroom (2)




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 22 of 37

Bedroom (3)

Bathroom




47 Mokihana, HI


Page 23 of 37

Front of house facing north

East side of house




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 24 of 37

East side of property

Back of house facing south




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 25 of 37

Southwest corner of house

West side of house




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 26 of 37

Chipping Paint under roof

Living Room




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 27 of 37

Bedroom (1)

Bedroom (2)




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 28 of 37

Bedroom (3)

Sunroom




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 29 of 37

Mold in Sunroom




61 Mokihana, HI


Page 30 of 37

Front facing south

West side of house




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 31 of 37

Western lawn with PVC cap to cesspool

Cesspool




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 32 of 37

Back of house facing north

Eastern side of house




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 33 of 37

Sun Room

Kitchen




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 34 of 37

Dining Room

Living room




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 35 of 37

Bathroom

Bedroom (1)




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 36 of 37

Bedroom (2)

Bedroom (3)




78 Mokihana, HI


Page 37 of 37

Mold in hallway leading in from the Car Port at the front of the house




78 Mokihana, HI


ATTACHMENT B

ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. REPORTWITH GEOCHECK


FORM-LBB-SPM

®kcehCoeGhtiwtropeR™paMsuidaRRDEehT

6 Armstrong Road, 4th floorShelton, CT 06484Toll Free: 800.352.0050www.edrnet.com

Hilo, HI36 Mokihana StreetHilo, HI 96720

Inquiry Number: 4688255.2sAugust 01, 2016

SECTION PAGE

Executive Summary ES1

Overview Map 2

Detail Map 3

Map Findings Summary 4

Map Findings 8

Orphan Summary 9

Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1

GEOCHECK ADDENDUM

Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1

Physical Setting Source Summary A-2

Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-5

Physical Setting Source Map A-7

Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-9

Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1

TC4688255.2s Page 1

Thank you for your business.Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050

with any questions or comments.

Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark NoticeThis Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental DataResources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALLENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLYLIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, norshould they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for anyproperty. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice.

Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in wholeor in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission.EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All othertrademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

TC4688255.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1

A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR).The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standardsand Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice forEnvironmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation ofenvironmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION

ADDRESS

36 MOKIHANA STREETHILO, HI 96720

COORDINATES

19.6960320 - 19˚ 41’ 45.71’’Latitude (North): 155.1114330 - 155˚ 6’ 41.15’’Longitude (West): Zone 5Universal Tranverse Mercator: 278669.9UTM X (Meters): 2179089.8UTM Y (Meters): 493 ft. above sea levelElevation:

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY

5949390 HILO, HITarget Property Map:2013Version Date:

5949410 PIIHONUA, HIWest Map:2013Version Date:

4688255.2s Page 2

NO MAPPED SITES FOUND

MAPPED SITES SUMMARY

Target Property Address:36 MOKIHANA STREETHILO, HI 96720

Click on Map ID to see full detail.

MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.)ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS

The target property was not listed in any of the databases searched by EDR.

DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES

No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") governmentrecords either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for thefollowing databases:

STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Federal NPL site listNPL National Priority ListProposed NPL Proposed National Priority List SitesNPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens

Federal Delisted NPL site listDelisted NPL National Priority List Deletions

Federal CERCLIS listFEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listingSEMS Superfund Enterprise Management System

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site listSEMS-ARCHIVE Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities listCORRACTS Corrective Action Report

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities listRCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal

Federal RCRA generators listRCRA-LQG RCRA - Large Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-SQG RCRA - Small Quantity GeneratorsRCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registriesLUCIS Land Use Control Information SystemUS ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites List

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


US INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls

Federal ERNS listERNS Emergency Response Notification System

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLISSHWS Sites List

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site listsSWF/LF Permitted Landfills in the State of Hawaii

State and tribal leaking storage tank listsLUST Leaking Underground Storage Tank DatabaseINDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

State and tribal registered storage tank listsFEMA UST Underground Storage Tank ListingUST Underground Storage Tank DatabaseINDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land

State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registriesENG CONTROLS Engineering Control SitesINST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sitesVCP Voluntary Response Program SitesINDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing

State and tribal Brownfields sitesBROWNFIELDS Brownfields Sites

ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS

Local Brownfield listsUS BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites

Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal SitesINDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian LandsODI Open Dump InventoryDEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated SitesUS HIST CDL Delisted National Clandestine Laboratory Register

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


CDL Clandestine Drug Lab ListingUS CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register

Local Land RecordsLIENS 2 CERCLA Lien Information

Records of Emergency Release ReportsHMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting SystemSPILLS Release NotificationsSPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch

Other Ascertainable RecordsRCRA NonGen / NLR RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer RegulatedFUDS Formerly Used Defense SitesDOD Department of Defense SitesSCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners ListingUS FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance InformationEPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program ListTSCA Toxic Substances Control ActTRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory SystemSSTS Section 7 Tracking SystemsROD Records Of DecisionRMP Risk Management PlansRAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking SystemPRP Potentially Responsible PartiesPADS PCB Activity Database SystemICIS Integrated Compliance Information SystemFTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)MLTS Material Licensing Tracking SystemCOAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation DataCOAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments ListPCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration DatabaseRADINFO Radiation Information DatabaseHIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case ListingDOT OPS Incident and Accident DataCONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent DecreesINDIAN RESERV Indian ReservationsFUSRAP Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action ProgramUMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings SitesLEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter SitesUS AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility SubsystemUS MINES Mines Master Index FileFINDS Facility Index System/Facility Registry SystemUXO Unexploded Ordnance SitesDOCKET HWC Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket ListingAIRS List of Permitted FacilitiesDRYCLEANERS Permitted Drycleaner Facility ListingFinancial Assurance Financial Assurance Information ListingUIC Underground Injection Wells ListingECHO Enforcement & Compliance History Information

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


FUELS PROGRAM EPA Fuels Program Registered Listing

EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS

EDR Exclusive RecordsEDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas PlantsEDR Hist Auto EDR Exclusive Historic Gas StationsEDR Hist Cleaner EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners

EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES

Exclusive Recovered Govt. ArchivesRGA HWS Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities ListRGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities ListRGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank

SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS

Surrounding sites were not identified.

Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis.

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY


Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 1 records.

Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________

HELCO POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER NO. SHWS

EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.


MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY

SearchTargetDistance Total

Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted


Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS

Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL

Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SEMS-ARCHIVE

Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS

Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF

Federal RCRA generators list 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-LQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG

Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL

Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000SHWS

State and tribal landfill and/orsolid waste disposal site lists

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LFState and tribal leaking storage tank lists

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUST 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST

State and tribal registered storage tank lists 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST

TC4688255.2s Page 4




0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST

State and tribal institutionalcontrol / engineering control registries

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INST CONTROL

State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500VCP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP

State and tribal Brownfields sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500BROWNFIELDS


Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS

Local Lists of Landfill / SolidWaste Disposal Sites

0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9

Local Lists of Hazardous waste /Contaminated Sites

0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL

Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2

Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90

Other Ascertainable Records 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS

TC4688255.2s Page 5




0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUSRAP 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFINDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000UXO 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOCKET HWC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPAIRS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPECHO 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FUELS PROGRAM


EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Auto 0 NR NR NR NR 0 0.125EDR Hist Cleaner


Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA HWS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST

0 0 0 0 0 0 0- Totals --

TC4688255.2s Page 6




NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database

TC4688255.2s Page 7

MAP FINDINGSMap IDDirection

EDR ID NumberDistanceEPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation

NO SITES FOUND

TC4688255.2s Page 8

ORPHAN SUMMARY

City EDR ID Site Name Site Address Zip Database(s)

Count: 1 records.

HILO S113230450 HELCO POLE-MOUNTED TRANSFORMER NO. POLE 7, KAUMANA DR 96720 SHWS

TC4688255.2s Page 9

To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agencyon a monthly or quarterly basis, as required.

Number of Days to Update: Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 daysfrom the date the government agency made the information available to the public.


Federal NPL site list

NPL: National Priority ListNational Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for prioritycleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygoncoverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center(EPIC) and regional EPA offices.

Date of Government Version: 03/07/2016Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2016Date Made Active in Reports: 04/15/2016Number of Days to Update: 10

Source: EPATelephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: 07/07/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

NPL Site Boundaries

Sources:

EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC)Telephone: 202-564-7333

EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659




EPA Region 10Telephone 206-553-8665

Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List SitesA site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rulein the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places onthe NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing.



NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund LiensFederal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authorityto file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property ownerreceived notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens.


Source: EPATelephone: 202-564-4267Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

TC4688255.2s Page GR-1

GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING

Federal Delisted NPL site list

Delisted NPL: National Priority List DeletionsThe National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that theEPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from theNPL where no further response is appropriate.



Federal CERCLIS list

FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listingA listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the ComprehensiveEnvironmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal FacilitiesRestoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 703-603-8704Last EDR Contact: 07/06/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

SEMS: Superfund Enterprise Management SystemSEMS (Superfund Enterprise Management System) tracks hazardous waste sites, potentially hazardous waste sites,and remedial activities performed in support of EPA’s Superfund Program across the United States. The list wasformerly know as CERCLIS, renamed to SEMS by the EPA in 2015. The list contains data on potentially hazardouswaste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons,pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA).This dataset also contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and thesites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL.


Source: EPATelephone: 800-424-9346Last EDR Contact: 04/05/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/01/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list

SEMS-ARCHIVE: Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive



SEMS-ARCHIVE (Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive) tracks sites that have no further interest underthe Federal Superfund Program based on available information. The list was formerly known as the CERCLIS-NFRAP,renamed to SEMS ARCHIVE by the EPA in 2015. EPA may perform a minimal level of assessment work at a site whileit is archived if site conditions change and/or new information becomes available. Archived sites have been removedand archived from the inventory of SEMS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge,assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list thesite on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate orother considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. The decision does not necessarily meanthat there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that. based upon available information, thelocation is not judged to be potential NPL site.



Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list

CORRACTS: Corrective Action ReportCORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity.



Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list

RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and DisposalRCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservationand Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The databaseincludes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous wasteas defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities thatmove hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of thewaste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: (415) 495-8895Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Federal RCRA generators list

RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity GeneratorsRCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservationand Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The databaseincludes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous wasteas defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generateover 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.





RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity GeneratorsRCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservationand Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The databaseincludes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous wasteas defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generatebetween 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month.



RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity GeneratorsRCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservationand Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The databaseincludes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous wasteas defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators(CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: (415) 495-8895Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries

LUCIS: Land Use Control Information SystemLUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closureproperties.


Source: Department of the NavyTelephone: 843-820-7326Last EDR Contact: 05/16/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/29/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites ListA listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, buildingfoundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmentalmedia or effect human health.



US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional ControlsA listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures,such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediationcare requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generallyrequired as part of the institutional controls.





Federal ERNS list

ERNS: Emergency Response Notification SystemEmergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardoussubstances.


Source: National Response Center, United States Coast GuardTelephone: 202-267-2180Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016Data Release Frequency: Annually

State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS

SHWS: Sites ListFacilities, sites or areas in which the Office of Hazard Evaluation and Emergency Response has an interest, hasinvestigated or may investigate under HRS 128D (includes CERCLIS sites).


Source: Department of HealthTelephone: 808-586-4249Last EDR Contact: 05/25/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists

SWF/LF: Permitted Landfills in the State of HawaiiSolid Waste Facilities/Landfill Sites. SWF/LF type records typically contain an inventory of solid waste disposalfacilities or landfills in a particular state. Depending on the state, these may be active or inactive facilitiesor open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Subtitle D Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposalsites.


Source: Department of HealthTelephone: 808-586-4245Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

State and tribal leaking storage tank lists

LUST: Leaking Underground Storage Tank DatabaseLeaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking undergroundstorage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state.



INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 415-972-3372Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly



INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming.


Source: EPA Region 8Telephone: 303-312-6271Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska


Source: EPA Region 7Telephone: 913-551-7003Last EDR Contact: 04/29/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma.



INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina.


Source: EPA Region 4Telephone: 404-562-8677Last EDR Contact: 04/26/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandA listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land.



INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLeaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin.


Source: EPA, Region 5Telephone: 312-886-7439Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/08/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandLUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington.





State and tribal registered storage tank lists

FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank ListingA listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks.


Source: FEMATelephone: 202-646-5797Last EDR Contact: 07/07/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

UST: Underground Storage Tank DatabaseRegistered Underground Storage Tanks. UST’s are regulated under Subtitle I of the Resource Conservation and RecoveryAct (RCRA) and must be registered with the state department responsible for administering the UST program. Availableinformation varies by state program.



INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennesseeand Tribal Nations)



INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations).



INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations).



INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations).





INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations).



INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten TribalNations).



INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations).



INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandThe Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indianland in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes).



State and tribal institutional control / engineering control registries

ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Control SitesA listing of sites with engineering controls in place.



INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional ControlsVoluntary Remediation Program and Brownfields sites with institutional controls in place.





State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites

INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority LisitngA listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7.



INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority ListingA listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1.



VCP: Voluntary Response Program SitesSites participating in the Voluntary Response Program. The purpose of the VRP is to streamline the cleanup processin a way that will encourage prospective developers, lenders, and purchasers to voluntarily cleanup properties.



State and tribal Brownfields sites

BROWNFIELDS: Brownfields SitesWith certain legal exclusions and additions, the term ‘brownfield site’ means real property, the expansion, redevelopment,or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant,or contaminant.




Local Brownfield lists

US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields SitesBrownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presenceor potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in theseproperties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment.Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfieldsgrant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information onTargeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained fromCleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which informationis reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 202-566-2777Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually



Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites

INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian LandsLocation of open dumps on Indian land.



ODI: Open Dump InventoryAn open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258Subtitle D Criteria.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 800-424-9346Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned

DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site LocationsA listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern RiversideCounty and northern Imperial County, California.


Source: EPA, Region 9Telephone: 415-947-4219Last EDR Contact: 07/20/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/07/2016Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites

US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory RegisterA listing of clandestine drug lab locations that have been removed from the DEAs National Clandestine LaboratoryRegister.


Source: Drug Enforcement AdministrationTelephone: 202-307-1000Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/13/2016Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

CDL: Clandestine Drug Lab ListingA listing of clandestine drug lab site locations.



US CDL: Clandestine Drug LabsA listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides thisweb site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reportedthey found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites.In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entryand does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example,contacting local law enforcement and local health departments.

TC4688255.2s Page GR-10



Source: Drug Enforcement AdministrationTelephone: 202-307-1000Last EDR Contact: 05/31/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

Local Land Records

LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien InformationA Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spentSuperfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination.CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties.



Records of Emergency Release Reports

HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting SystemHazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT.


Source: U.S. Department of TransportationTelephone: 202-366-4555Last EDR Contact: 06/28/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016Data Release Frequency: Annually

SPILLS: Release NotificationsReleases of hazardous substances to the environment reported to the Office of Hazard Evaluation and EmergencyResponse since 1988.



SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearchSpills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically,they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that arealready included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90.


Source: FirstSearchTelephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: 01/03/2013Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned

Other Ascertainable Records

RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer RegulatedRCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservationand Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The databaseincludes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous wasteas defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardouswaste.

TC4688255.2s Page GR-11



Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: (415) 495-8895Last EDR Contact: 06/30/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

FUDS: Formerly Used Defense SitesThe listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineersis actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions.


Source: U.S. Army Corps of EngineersTelephone: 202-528-4285Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

DOD: Department of Defense SitesThis data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, thathave any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands.


Source: USGSTelephone: 888-275-8747Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

FEDLAND: Federal and Indian LandsFederally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corpsof Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land,Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management,Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service.


Source: U.S. Geological SurveyTelephone: 888-275-8747Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016Data Release Frequency: N/A

SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners ListingThe State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Officeof Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with establisheddrycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas,Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin.



US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance InformationAll owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provideproof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities.



TC4688255.2s Page GR-12


EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LISTEPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcementmatters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Beingon the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation byEPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violationhas in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the allegedviolations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state andlocal agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved.



2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program ListThe EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective ActionUniverse. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universecontains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated buthave since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation.Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations.



TSCA: Toxic Substances Control ActToxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on theTSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plantsite.


Source: EPATelephone: 202-260-5521Last EDR Contact: 06/24/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years

TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory SystemToxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water andland in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313.


Source: EPATelephone: 202-566-0250Last EDR Contact: 05/24/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016Data Release Frequency: Annually

SSTS: Section 7 Tracking SystemsSection 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires allregistered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devicesbeing produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year.



TC4688255.2s Page GR-13


ROD: Records Of DecisionRecord of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technicaland health information to aid in the cleanup.



RMP: Risk Management PlansWhen Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidancefor chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management ProgramRule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existingindustry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substancesto develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effectsof an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternativeaccidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employeetraining measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measuresand procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur.



RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking SystemRCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRApertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administrationactions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy ofthe database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resourcesmade it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database.


Source: EPATelephone: 202-564-4104Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

PRP: Potentially Responsible PartiesA listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties



PADS: PCB Activity Database SystemPCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposersof PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities.



TC4688255.2s Page GR-14


ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information SystemThe Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcementand compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES)program.



FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA,TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts theAgency on a quarterly basis.


Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic SubstancesTelephone: 202-566-1667Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act)A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements.



MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking SystemMLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites whichpossess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency,EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis.


Source: Nuclear Regulatory CommissionTelephone: 301-415-7169Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/22/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation DataA listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds.


Source: Department of EnergyTelephone: 202-586-8719Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments ListA listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: 06/10/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC4688255.2s Page GR-15


PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration DatabaseThe database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals.



RADINFO: Radiation Information DatabaseThe Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S.Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity.



HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case ListingA complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. Theinformation was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA(Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regionsare now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarterswith updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be includedin the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 202-564-2501Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case ListingA complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPAregions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementationof FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). SomeEPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providingEPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records thatmay not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated.


Source: Environmental Protection AgencyTelephone: 202-564-2501Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned

DOT OPS: Incident and Accident DataDepartment of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data.


Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline SafetyTelephone: 202-366-4595Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/15/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent DecreesMajor legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Releasedperiodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters.

TC4688255.2s Page GR-16



Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree LibraryTelephone: VariesLast EDR Contact: 07/15/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/10/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

BRS: Biennial Reporting SystemThe Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generationand management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG)and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities.


Source: EPA/NTISTelephone: 800-424-9346Last EDR Contact: 05/27/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/05/2016Data Release Frequency: Biennially

INDIAN RESERV: Indian ReservationsThis map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greaterthan 640 acres.


Source: USGSTelephone: 202-208-3710Last EDR Contact: 07/15/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/24/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

FUSRAP: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action ProgramDOE established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites whereradioactive contamination remained from Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations.



UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings SitesUranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the millsshut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted fromthe ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailingswere used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized.



LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter SitesA listing of former lead smelter site locations.



LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter SitesA list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sitesmay pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust

TC4688255.2s Page GR-17



Source: American Journal of Public HealthTelephone: 703-305-6451Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned

US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS)The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance dataon air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. Thisinformation comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants,steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action,air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliancedata from industrial plants.



US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System DataA listing of minor source facilities.



US MINES: Mines Master Index FileContains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includesviolation information.


Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health AdministrationTelephone: 303-231-5959Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually

US MINES 2: Ferrous and Nonferrous Metal Mines Database ListingThis map layer includes ferrous (ferrous metal mines are facilities that extract ferrous metals, such as ironore or molybdenum) and nonferrous (Nonferrous metal mines are facilities that extract nonferrous metals, suchas gold, silver, copper, zinc, and lead) metal mines in the United States.


Source: USGSTelephone: 703-648-7709Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

US MINES 3: Active Mines & Mineral Plants Database ListingActive Mines and Mineral Processing Plant operations for commodities monitored by the Minerals Information Teamof the USGS.


Source: USGSTelephone: 703-648-7709Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/12/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

TC4688255.2s Page GR-18


FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry SystemFacility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain moredetail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (AerometricInformation Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicialenforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (CriminalDocket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal FacilitiesInformation System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System).


Source: EPATelephone: (415) 947-8000Last EDR Contact: 06/08/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/19/2016Data Release Frequency: Quarterly

DOCKET HWC: Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket ListingA complete list of the Federal Agency Hazardous Waste Compliance Docket Facilities.



UXO: Unexploded Ordnance SitesA listing of unexploded ordnance site locations


Source: Department of DefenseTelephone: 571-373-0407Last EDR Contact: 06/20/2016Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/03/2016Data Release Frequency: Varies

AIRS: List of Permitted FacilitiesA listing of permitted facilities in the state.



DRYCLEANERS: Permitted Drycleaner Facility ListingA listing of permitted drycleaner facilities in the state.



Financial Assurance: Financial Assurance Information ListingA listing of financial assurance information for underground storage tank facilities. Financial assurance is intendedto ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measuresif the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay.



TC4688255.2s Page GR-19


UIC: Underground Injection Wells ListingA listing of underground injection well locations.



FUELS PROGRAM: EPA Fuels Program Registered ListingThis listing includes facilities that are registered under the Part 80 (Code of Federal Regulations) EPA FuelsPrograms. All companies now are required to submit new and updated registrations.



ECHO: Enforcement & Compliance History InformationECHO provides integrated compliance and enforcement information for about 800,000 regulated facilities nationwide.




EDR Exclusive Records

EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas PlantsThe EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants)compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’sto produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixtureof coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production,such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compoundsare potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequentlydisposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soiland groundwater contamination.

Date of Government Version: N/ADate Data Arrived at EDR: N/ADate Made Active in Reports: N/ANumber of Days to Update: N/A

Source: EDR, Inc.Telephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: No Update Planned

EDR Hist Auto: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas StationsEDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potentialgas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limitedto those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service stationestablishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station,filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls withina category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presentsunique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns,but may not show up in current government records searches.


Source: EDR, Inc.Telephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: Varies

TC4688255.2s Page GR-20


EDR Hist Cleaner: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry CleanersEDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potentialdry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sourcesthat might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but werenot limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database fallswithin a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effortpresents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmentalconcerns, but may not show up in current government records searches.


Source: EDR, Inc.Telephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: N/ANext Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: Varies


Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives

RGA HWS: Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste Facilities ListThe EDR Recovered Government Archive State Hazardous Waste database provides a list of SHWS incidents derivedfrom historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiledfrom Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii.

Date of Government Version: N/ADate Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013Date Made Active in Reports: 01/08/2014Number of Days to Update: 191

Source: Department of HealthTelephone: N/ALast EDR Contact: 06/01/2012Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/AData Release Frequency: Varies

RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities ListThe EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databasesand includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly availablefrom the Department of Health in Hawaii.



RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage TankThe EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidentsderived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists.Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Health in Hawaii.



OTHER DATABASE(S)

Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not becomplete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in thearea covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarilymean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report.

TC4688255.2s Page GR-21


Oil/Gas PipelinesSource: PennWell CorporationPetroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and SpecialtyGases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases(Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This informationis provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrantits fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.

Electric Power Transmission Line DataSource: PennWell CorporationThis map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a besteffort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for anyparticular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell.

Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivityto environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of allsensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers,and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located.

AHA Hospitals:Source: American Hospital Association, Inc.Telephone: 312-280-5991The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals.

Medical Centers: Provider of Services ListingSource: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ServicesTelephone: 410-786-3000A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services,a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

Nursing HomesSource: National Institutes of HealthTelephone: 301-594-6248Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States.

Public SchoolsSource: National Center for Education StatisticsTelephone: 202-502-7300The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementaryand secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statisticaldatabase of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that arecomparable across all states.

Private SchoolsSource: National Center for Education StatisticsTelephone: 202-502-7300The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States.

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the FederalEmergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDRin 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetlands InventorySource: Office of PlanningTelephone: 808-587-2895

Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic MapSource: U.S. Geological Survey

TC4688255.2s Page GR-22


STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.

TC4688255.2s Page GR-23


TC4688255.2s Page A-1

geologic strata.of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of theGroundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics

2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and

Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components:

forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in

2013Version Date:5949410 PIIHONUA, HIWest Map:

2013Version Date:5949390 HILO, HITarget Property Map:

USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP

493 ft. above sea levelElevation:2179089.8UTM Y (Meters): 278669.9UTM X (Meters): Zone 5Universal Tranverse Mercator: 155.111433 - 155˚ 6’ 41.16’’Longitude (West): 19.696032 - 19˚ 41’ 45.72’’Latitude (North):

TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES

HILO, HI 9672036 MOKIHANA STREETHILO, HI

TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM®

TC4688255.2s Page A-2

should be field verified.on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximitySource: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated

SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES

Elev

atio

n (ft

)El

evat

ion

(ft)

TP

TP0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 493 ft.

North South

West East

633

625

607576

558

538

519

519

499

493

481

486

458

499463

441

453

439

444821 763

755

734

726 681 633 602 561 493

464

441

425

409

402

385

382

368

357

General ENEGeneral Topographic Gradient:TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY

should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used toTOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic datausing site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on otherGroundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professionalGROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY®

TC4688255.2s Page A-3

Not Reported

GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATIONGROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID

hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determinedflow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatoryEDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

AQUIFLOW®

Search Radius: 1.000 Mile.

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldof groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist theHydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicatorHYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapHILO

NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORYNWI ElectronicData CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property

1551660890C - FEMA Q3 Flood data1551660860C - FEMA Q3 Flood dataAdditional Panels in search area:

1551660880C - FEMA Q3 Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property:

YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapHAWAII, HI

FEMA FLOOD ZONEFEMA FloodElectronic DataTarget Property County

and bodies of water).Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways

contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldSurface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assistHYDROLOGIC INFORMATION


TC4688255.2s Page A-4

Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. BeikmanGeologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology

ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION

-Category:-Era:-System:-Series:N/ACode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series)

at which contaminant migration may be occurring.Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speedGEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY

move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumesto rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soilusing site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessaryGroundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professionalGROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION



2

1

0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles

TC4688255.2s Page A-6

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:

> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:

ModerateCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:

Hydric Status: Partially hydric

Well drainedSoil Drainage Class:

water table, or are shallow to an impervious layer.Class D - Very slow infiltration rates. Soils are clayey, have a highHydrologic Group:

muckSoil Surface Texture:

KeaukahaSoil Component Name:

Soil Map ID: 2

Max: Min: Min: 0.42Max: 1.42Not reportedNot reportedbedrock59 inches 0 inches 1

Soil Layer Information

Boundary Classification Saturatedhydraulicconductivitymicro m/sec

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction(pH)

> 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min:

> 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min:

Not ReportedCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel:

Hydric Status: Not hydric

Excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class:

movement of water, or soils with moderately fine or fine textures.Class C - Slow infiltration rates. Soils with layers impeding downwardHydrologic Group:

bedrockSoil Surface Texture:

Lava flows, pahoehoeSoil Component Name:

Soil Map ID: 1

in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patternsSurvey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey informationThe U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil

DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY


TC4688255.2s Page A-7

1/2 - 1 Mile NNEHI9000000004306 21/2 - 1 Mile EastHI9000000004263 1

STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION

LOCATIONFROM TPWELL IDMAP ID

Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location.

No PWS System Found

FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION


1/2 - 1 Mile NorthUSGS40000268576 3

FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION


1.000State DatabaseNearest PWS within 0.001 milesFederal FRDS PWS1.000Federal USGS

WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION

SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE

opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming anEDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

Max: Min: Min: 0.02Max: 0.42Not reportedNot reportedbedrock18 inches 7 inches 2

Max: Min: Min: 42.34Max: 141

soils, Peat.Highly organicA-8muck 7 inches 0 inches 1

Soil Layer Information

Boundary Classification Saturatedhydraulicconductivitymicro m/sec

Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction(pH)



TC4688255.2s Page A-9

Not ReportedLand owner:ISF Development Co., LtdOwner user:

-1Utm:0Gps:19.706944Lat83dd:-155.106944Long83dd:67Quad map:Roscoe Moss Hawaii IncDriller:1993Yr drilled:

Not ReportedOld name:Ponohawai 3Well name:HawaiiIsland:8-4206-001Wid:

2NNE1/2 - 1 MileLower

HI9000000004306HI WELLS

HI9000000004263Site id:Not ReportedT:Not ReportedSurveyor:Not ReportedPir:

23-APR-14Wcr:Not ReportedLatest hd:80401Aqui code:

(3) 2-4-001:122Tmk:Not ReportedPump depth:Not ReportedPump elev:Not ReportedDraft mgd:

0Pump mgd:Not ReportedSpec capac:

Not ReportedBot perf:Not ReportedBot solid:Not ReportedBot hole:Not ReportedDraft yr:

0Pump yr:Qk1oGeology:

Not ReportedMin chlor:Not ReportedMax chlor:Not ReportedHead feet:66Draft mgy:

0Pump gpm:Not ReportedTest unit:Not ReportedTest temp:Not ReportedTest chlor:Not ReportedTest ddown:Not ReportedTest gpm:Not ReportedTest date:

0Init cl:223.3Init head3:

Not ReportedInit head2:Not ReportedInit head:Not ReportedUse year:Not ReportedUse:

Not ReportedPerf case:Not ReportedSolid case:0Well depth:

Not ReportedGround el:Not ReportedCasing dia:Not ReportedWell type:Not ReportedOld number:

Beylik Drilling & Pump Service Inc.Pump insta:University of Hawaii Hilo, UHHLand owner:Department of Water Supply Hawaii - Hilo, HDWSOwner user:

0Utm:0Gps:19.694869Lat83dd:-155.099546Long83dd:0Quad map:Beylik Drilling & Pump Service Inc.Driller:0Yr drilled:

Not ReportedOld name:UH HiloWell name:HawaiiIsland:8-4106-001Wid:

1East1/2 - 1 MileLower

HI9000000004263HI WELLS

Map IDDirectionDistanceElevation EDR ID NumberDatabase

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS®

TC4688255.2s Page A-10

Not ReportedFormation type:Not ReportedAquifername:

USCountrycode:HILOCALVert coord refsys:Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method:feetVert accmeasure units:

5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units:430.00Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys:

Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method:secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure:24000Sourcemap scale:-155.1102863Longitude:19.7091834Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units:Not ReportedDrainagearea value:20010000Huc code:

Not ReportedMonloc desc:WellMonloc type:8-4206.01A-BMonloc name:USGS-194244155064701Monloc Identifier:USGS Hawaii Water Science CenterFormal name:USGS-HIOrg. Identifier:

3North1/2 - 1 MileLower

USGS40000268576FED USGS

HI9000000004306Site id:Not ReportedT:Not ReportedSurveyor:Not ReportedPir:

01-NOV-93Wcr:Not ReportedLatest hd:80401Aqui code:

(3) 2-3-044:009Tmk:Not ReportedPump depth:Not ReportedPump elev:Not ReportedDraft mgd:

0Pump mgd:Not ReportedSpec capac:

-20Bot perf:0Bot solid:-85Bot hole:Not ReportedDraft yr:

0Pump yr:Not ReportedGeology:

Not ReportedMin chlor:Not ReportedMax chlor:Not ReportedHead feet:Not ReportedDraft mgy:

0Pump gpm:Not ReportedTest unit:Not ReportedTest temp:2Test chlor:Not ReportedTest ddown:Not ReportedTest gpm:10/25/1993Test date:

0Init cl:Not ReportedInit head3:

Not ReportedInit head2:243Init head:Not ReportedUse year:UNU - UnusedUse:

400Perf case:380Solid case:465Well depth:

380Ground el:12Casing dia:PERWell type:Not ReportedOld number:

Not ReportedPump insta:


TC4688255.2s Page A-11

Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 0

ftWellholedepth units:8Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units:8Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date:

Not ReportedAquifer type:


TC4688255.2s Page A-12

0%0%100%-0.106 pCi/LBasementNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor0%0%100%-0.112 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor

% >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea

Number of sites tested: 43

Federal Area Radon Information for Zip Code: 96720

: Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L.

Federal EPA Radon Zone for HAWAII County: 3

AREA RADON INFORMATION

®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGSRADON

®

TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM)Source: United States Geologic SurveyEDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM correspondsto the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation datawith consistent elevation units and projection.

Current USGS 7.5 Minute Topographic MapSource: U.S. Geological Survey

HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION

Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the FederalEmergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA.

NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDRin 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

State Wetlands Data: Wetlands InventorySource: Office of PlanningTelephone: 808-587-2895

HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION

AQUIFLOW Information SystemRSource: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow informationEDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater

flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and hasextracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water tableinformation.

GEOLOGIC INFORMATION

Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic UnitSource: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digitalrepresentation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).

STATSGO: State Soil Geographic DatabaseSource: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the nationalConservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soilsurvey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representationof soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO)soil survey maps.

SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic DatabaseSource: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)Telephone: 800-672-5559SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Service, mappingscales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used toconstruct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates theoriginal soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and countynatural resource planning and management.

TC4688255.2s Page PSGR-1

PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED

LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS

FEDERAL WATER WELLS

PWS: Public Water SystemsSource: EPA/Office of Drinking WaterTelephone: 202-564-3750Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at

least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources.

PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement DataSource: EPA/Office of Drinking WaterTelephone: 202-564-3750Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after

August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS).

USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS)This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surfacewater and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater.

STATE RECORDS

Well Index DatabaseSource: Commission on Water Resource ManagementTelephone: 808-587-0214CWRM maintains a Well Index Database to track specific information pertaining to the construction and installation

of production wells in Hawaii

OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION

RADON

Area Radon InformationSource: USGSTelephone: 703-356-4020The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency(USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey.The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected atprivate sources such as universities and research institutions.

EPA Radon ZonesSource: EPATelephone: 703-356-4020Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoorradon levels.

OTHER

Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilitiesSource: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656

Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greaterSource: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary faultlines, preparedin 1975 by the United State Geological Survey



STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION

© 2015 TomTom North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protectionand other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subjectto the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material.




ATTACHMENT C

USER QUESTIONNAIRE


PRE-ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AUDITQUESTIONNAIRE

Answer the following questions to the best of your knowledge. If a question does not apply, or if you are unsure of the answer, please indicate so in your response. If possible, please identify which participant responded to the question or set of questions. This will assist in the verification of suspected contamination during the site inspection, investigation, and interview process.

Name: Andrew Noell Date:10/11/2016

Site: 36, 47, 61, and 78 Mokihana Street and 21 Honi Place

City & State: Hilo Hawaii

1. List all the personnel involved in the completion of this survey. Include names of any individuals who have experience in operations at your site. This list of contacts will be used to arrange interviews during the site inspection and investigation.

Andrew Noell, Robert Sullivan

2. What is the basis for the Agency’s current real property interests at this location?

Owner/Operator

3. Where is the property located (complete address, longitude/latitude, parcel number, orlegal description if available)?

36, 47, 61, and 78 Mokihana Street and 21 Honi Place Hilo, HI. 96720

4. How large is the property (acreage)?

Unsure

5. Is the site located on or near any waterways, schools, or recreational facilities?

Not really

6. Does the property contain new buildings, improvements, or other modifications since current owner’s occupancy?

No

7. How large are the new structures?

N/A

8. What are the ages of the buildings?

41

9. How are the buildings being used?

Community family housing

10. Who are the current owners and operators?

U.S. Coast Guard

10. Identify the main contacts for further inquiries.

Andrew Noell, Robert Sullivan

11. What are the current uses of the subject property?

Community family housing

12. Who were the past owners and operators of the property?

N/A

13. What were the past uses of the property? (To the best of your knowledge)

Unimproved land

15. Is the current owner or operator aware of any present or past underground oraboveground storage tanks located on or adjacent to the subject property?

No

16. If yes, can the owner/ operator demonstrate that the tanks have been properlyclosed, installed, certified or that existing tanks are not currently leaking?

N/A


ATTACHMENT D

CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT


Hilo, HI 36 MOKIHANA STREET HILO, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 4688255.14S-1

The EDR Chain of Title

The EDR Chain of Title Report tracks a line of successive owners from the present back to 1940 of a particular parcel of property, linked together by recorded transactions which pass title. Available nationwide, this report provides a summary of a property's ownership history and is a valuable source for determining the prior uses of a property. A network of professional abstractors following established procedures, uses client supplied address information to locate: • Historical Chain of Title research • Leases and Miscellaneous

Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050


Disclaimer – Copyright and Trademark Notice

This report was prepared for the use of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. and AFX Research LLC, exclusively. This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, nor a policy of title insurance. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) and AFX Research LLC specifically disclaim the making of any such warranties, including without limitation, merchantability or fitness for a particular use or purpose. The information contained in this report is retrieved as it is recorded from the various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners.

TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS

Hilo, HI 36 MOKIHANA STREET HILO

RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: HAWAII County RECORDER OF DEEDS Source 2: HAWAII County COUNTY ASSESSOR Examiner's Note: Public records of HAWAII County, HI were searched from January 1, 1940 to 08/15/2016, and no

other deeds vesting title in the subject property were found of record during the period searched. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION Current Owner: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Legal Description: AS RECORDED IN THE DEED BELOW Property Identifiers: 3-2-5-048-043-0000 General Comments: HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE See Exhibit "A" LEASES AND MISCELANEOUS See Exhibit "B"

Chain of Title

Exhibit "A"

HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE Parcel 3-2-5-048-043-0000 Chain 1

Type of Deed: DEED

Title is vested in: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Title received from: FRANCIS CLAYTON COX AND KENNETH B. GRIFFIN

Date Executed: 02/24/1975

Date Recorded: 03/05/1975

Book(Book): 10499

Page: 163

Volume: NA

Instrument #: 75-15306

Docket: NA

Land Record Comments:

Chain 2

Type of Deed: DEED

Title is vested in: COX & GRIFFIN

Title received from: ROBERT GRANT CO.



Book: 10384

Page: 362

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA


Chain 3

Type of Deed: DEED





Book: 10020

Page: 14

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA

Land Record Comments: SEARCHED BACK TO 1940. LOT CREATED IN 1971, LAST DEED OF RECORD

FOUND.

LEASES and MISCELANEOUS

Exhibit "B"

HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE 1. Type of Instrument NONE IDENTIFIED

First Party Second Party Recorded Book Page Document No. Comments

Hilo, HI 47 MOKIHANA STREET HILO, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 4688255.14S








Hilo, HI 47 MOKIHANA STREET HILO

RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: HAWAII County RECORDER OF DEEDS Source 2: HAWAII County COUNTY ASSESSOR Examiner's Note: Public records of HAWAII County, HI were searched from January 1, 1940 to 08/15/2016, and no


Chain of Title

Exhibit "A"


Type of Deed: DEED





Book(Book): 10499

Page: 163

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA


Chain 2

Type of Deed: DEED





Book: 10384

Page: 362

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA


Chain 3 Type of Deed: DEED





Book: 10020

Page: 14

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA

Land Record Comments: SEARCHED BACK TO 1940, LAST DEED OF RECORD. LOT CREATED IN 1971.


Exhibit "B"



Hilo, HI 61 MOKIHANA STREET HILO, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 4688255.14S








Hilo, HI 61 MOKIHANA STREET HILO, HI 96720

RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: HAWAII COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS Source 2: HAWAII COUNTY ASSESSOR Examiner's Note: Public records of HAWAII County, HI were searched from January 1, 1940 to 08/15/2016, and no


Chain of Title

Exhibit "A"


Type of Deed: DEED





Book(Book): 10499

Page: 163

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA


Chain 2

Type of Deed: DEED





Book: 10384

Page: 362

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA







Book: 10020

Page: 14

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA



Exhibit "B"



Hilo, HI 21 HONI PLACE HILO, HI 96720 Inquiry Number: 4688255.14S








Hilo, HI 21 HONI PLACE HILO, HI 96720

RESEARCH SOURCE Source 1: HAWAII COUNTY RECORDER OF DEEDS Source 2: HAWAII COUNTY ASSESSOR Examiner's Note: Public records of HAWAII County, HI were searched from January 1, 1940 to 08/15/2016, and no


Chain of Title

Exhibit "A"


Type of Deed: DEED





Book(Book): 10499

Page: 163

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA


Chain 2

Type of Deed: DEED





Book: 10384

Page: 362

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA







Book: 10020

Page: 14

Volume: NA

Instrument #: NA

Docket: NA



Exhibit "B"



Documents

Final Environmental Compliance Activities Report - Hilo ...€¦ · Environmental Compliance Due Diligence Report 2.0 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL DUE DILIGENCE AUDIT OVERVIEW The Phase