Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    1/59

    APRESENTATION

    ON

    Aggregate Inventory Management&

    Distribution inventory management

    :Presented ByPriyanka Gupta( )2010PMM124Anupama Kumari( )2009PMM119

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    2/59

    Inventory & Flow of Materials

    vRaw materialsvWork-in-process (WIP)vRaw and in-process (RIP)

    vFinished goodsvDistribution inventoriesvMaintenance, repair, & operational supplies(MROs)

    v

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    3/59

    Inventory Objectives

    Inventories must be coordinated to meetthree conflicting objectives:

    Maximize customer service

    Minimize plant operation costs

    Minimize inventory investment

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    4/59

    Inventory Costs

    Inventory management costs

    Item costs

    Carrying costsOrdering costs

    Stock out costs

    Capacity-related costs

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    5/59

    Functions of Inventories

    Meet anticipated demandSmooth production requirements

    Decouple components of productiondistribution systemProtect against stock outs (provide customerservice)

    Take advantage of order cyclesHedge against price increasesExploit quantity discountsPermit operations

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    6/59

    Aggregate Inventory

    ManagementAggregate inventory management (AIM) is

    concerned with managing inventories according totheir classifications (raw material, work-in-process, finished goods, etc.) & the function theyperform.

    AIM is financially oriented & concerned with costs

    & benefits of carrying the classifications ofinventories

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    7/59

    Aggregate Inventory

    ManagementAIM involves

    Flow & kind of inventory needed

    Supply & demand patterns

    Functions inventory performs

    Objectives of inventory management

    Costs associated with inventory

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    8/59

    It is a technique developed for handling

    EOQs in a aggregate and dealing with theproblem of constraint of EOQ equation. It providesa means to calculate directly the proper lot size fora family of items to meet some constraints.

    Then LIMIT order quantities are calculatedwith the help of formulas A & B

    LOT SIZE INVENTORYMANAGEMENT INTERPOLATION

    TECHNIQUES (LIMIT)

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    9/59

    FORMULA

    LIMIT formula A = IL= IT(HL/HT)2

    LIMIT formula B =

    M=HT

    /HL

    =(IT

    /IL

    )WhereHL=Di*hi/QLi=Total set up hours for present LIMITorderquantities.HT=Di*hi/QTi=Total set up hours for trial order quantities.IT = Inventory carrying cost for trial order quantities.IL = Inventory carrying cost used for LIMIT order quantities.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    10/59

    Example 1 Suppose that D=10000, S=$125, I=0.25,C=$10, what is the trial lot size? If we were limitedto 5 setup in the year, find M with the help of LIMITformula.

    Solution:QT= (2DS/Ic) = (2*10000*125/0.25*10)

    =1000Setup in the year= D/Q=10

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    11/59

    limited setup in the year=5D/QL=5QL=2000QL= (2DS/ILc) = (2*10000*125/IL*10)=2000

    IL=6.25%Relationship between the trial and the LIMIT lotsizeQL=M*QTWhere M=(IT/IL) 2000=M*1000M=2

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    12/59

    Example-2The two item in our inventory have been managed in a seat ofthe pants fashion for several years. The following table showsthe current situation:

    Current setup costs=$62.50 per hourCarrying cost percentage= IT=35%How can this situation be handled using LIMIT?

    Item AnnualUsage D

    SetupHours per

    order h

    Unit Costof item c

    PresentOrder

    QuantityQ

    Yearly SetupHours HA 10000 2 10 769 26

    B 5000 3 15 1667 9Total 35

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    13/59

    Yearly limited Setup Hours HHP=Di *hi/QPi

    For A, HP=(10000*2/769)=26For B, HP=(5000*3/1667)=9Total HP=35hours,

    Cost per Setup SFor A=$62.50*2=$125.00For B=$62.50*3=$187.50

    Trial lot size QT=(2DS/Ic)For A={(2*10000*125)/(0.35*10)}=845For B={(2*5000*187)/(0.35*15)}=598

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    14/59

    Approximate Yearly Setup Hours HTHT=Di *hi/QTi

    For A, HT=(10000*2/845)=24For B, HT=(5000*3/598)=25

    M=HT/HL=1.4QL=M*QT=1.4*QT

    Item Cost per Setup

    S

    Trial Q Approximate Yearly Setup

    Hours HTA $125.0 845 24B $187.5 598 25Total 49

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    15/59

    This leads us directly to the LIMIT order quantities:

    Inventory LIMIT carrying percentageIL= IT(HL/HT)2

    =0.35(35/49)2=0.1786

    Item LMIT Quantity QL

    Approximately Yearly SetupHours HLA 1.4*845=1183 17B 1.4*598=837 18Total 35

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    16/59

    Based on this implied carrying cost

    percentage of 17.86%, we calculate the TotalRelevant Cost in the table with the help of theseformulas:-

    Annual holding cost= (Q/2)*ILcAnnual ordering cost= (D/Q)S

    TRC=annual holding cost+annual ordering cost

    TRC=(Q/2)h+(D/Q)S

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    17/59

    Lot size Annual HoldingCost ($)

    Annual Setup Cost($)

    TotalRelevant

    Costs ($)

    QP-A 769 687 1625 2312

    QP-B 1667 2233 563 2796Total 2920 2188 5108QT-A 845 755 1479 2234QT-B 598 801 1568 2369

    Total 1556 3047 4603QL-A 1183 1057 1057 2114QL-B 837 1120 1120 2240Total 2177 2177 4354

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    18/59

    Optimal,given I=35%

    Agg

    regate

    AnnualSetupC

    ost($

    )

    Aggregate Annual Holding Cost ($)

    Exchange curve

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    19/59

    19

    Lagrange Multipliers

    The method of Lagrange multipliers provides astrategy for finding the maxima and minima ofa function subject to constraints.

    It gives a set of necessary conditions to identify

    optimal points of equality constrained optimizationproblems.

    This is done by converting a constrained problemto an equivalent unconstrained problem with thehelp of certain unspecified parameters known asLagrange multipliers.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    20/59

    consider the optimization problemmaximize f(x,y)subject to g(x,y)=c.the Lagrange function defined byL(x,y,)=f(x,y)+*{g(x,y)-c}

    Figure 1: Find x and y to maximize f(x,y) subjectto a constraint (shown in red) g(x,y) = c.

    Figure 2: Contour map of Figure 1. The red lineshows the constraint g(x,y) = c. The blue linesare contours of f(x,y). The point where the red

    line tangentially touches a blue contour is oursolution.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    21/59

    Lagrange multiplier technique:-L(x,y,)=f(x,y)+g(x,y)(the Lagrange function)

    Lx=fx+gx=0 (1) =-(fx/gx)Ly=fy+gy=0 (2)

    =-(fy/gy)L=g(x,y)=0 (3)

    eq. (1) & (2) gives the slope condition: fx/gx=fy/gy fx/fy=gx/gy =dx/dyeq. (3) provides satisfaction of the constraints.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    22/59

    Example-3

    Solve the following problemusing the Lagrange multiplier method:Suppose that we have a profit function:-Max f(x,y)=x+3ySubject to g(x,y)=x2+y2-10=0

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    23/59

    SolutionExamine the profit line:

    =x+3yIn terms of y y=( /3)-(1/3)x slope=-1/3dy/dx=-1/3

    also g(x,y) solve in terms of x

    y 2=10-x 2 y=10-x 2

    dy/dx=-(x/y)

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    24/59

    equating the slope of the profit line and theconstraint line gives -(1/3)=-(x/y)

    y=3x; but y2=10-x2 x=1 and y=3Conclusion:-profit are maximized at (x,y)=(1,3)

    with profit of x+3y=10.

    Apply the Lagrange multiplier technique:-L(x,y,)=x+3y-(x2+y2-10)Lx=1-2x=0Ly=3-2y=0L=x2+y2-10=0

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    25/59

    solve for : =(1/2x)=(3/2y) y=3xalso y=10-x 2

    3x=10-x 2

    x=1, y=3

    gives profit f(1,3)=1+3*3=10

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    26/59

    Example-4

    Applying the Lagrange multiplier techniquein example-3 and specify the minimization from thetotal setup cost & inventory holding costs.

    Solution:-for minimize the total setup costs (D1S1/Q1)+(D2S2/Q2)

    =(10000*125/Q1)+(5000*187.5/Q2)subject to an inventory investment constraintQ1*(I c1)/2+ Q2*(I c2)/2 =2920

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    27/59

    Q1*0.1786*10/2+ Q2*0.1786*15/2=2920

    apply Lagrange functionaL=(D1S1/Q1)+(D2S2/Q2)+[Q1*(I c1)/2+ Q2*(I c2)/2]diff with respect to Q1,Q2 and we obtainL/ Q1= D1S1/Q1^2+( I c1)/2=0

    L/ Q2= D2S2/Q2^ 2+( I c2)/2=0L/ =Q1*(I c1)/2+ Q2*(I c2)/2=2920

    solve eq we obtain=0.555Q1=1587Q2=1122

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    28/59

    minimum value of inventory holding costs asQ1*h1/2+ Q2*h2/2=(1587*10*0.1786)/2+(1122*15*0.1786)/2=2920

    setup cost are

    (D1S1/Q1)+(D2S2/Q2)=10000*125/1587+5000*187.50/1122=1624

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    29/59

    Distribution inventory

    management Reality customers are not conveniently located

    next to the factory. Often inventory must stored in several locations. The main issues are :1. Where to have warehouses and what to stock.2. How to replace stocks, given the answer to the

    first issue.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    30/59

    Multi location inventories

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    31/59

    Multi location systemabsorbent system

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    32/59

    Multi location system

    Coalescent systems: have material coming together into one enditem.Series system : have locations feeding each other in a direct path.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    33/59

    Measures of multi location inventorysystem

    Fill rate : fill rate or percent unit service, gives the averagefraction of unit demand satisfied from stock on hand.

    Fills: number of unit demanded and satisfied per unit time. Fills =fill rate * demand

    Expected number of backorder: is the time weighted averagenumber of backorders outstanding at a stocking location.Including times of zero backorders, this measures dependson fill rate.

    Expected number of backorder=

    expected delay*demand rate Expected delay : average time necessary to satisfy a unit of

    demand .

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    34/59

    Inventory holding cost. Setup costs and ordering costs. Stockout cost. System stability costs : cost associated with

    overreaction to changes demand rates.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    35/59

    Example:-D(annual demand)=1000unitQ(order quantity)=100unit

    B(maximum back order)=10unitwhat is the expected number of back orders.

    Solution:Average back order position=

    B/2=10/2=5unitPercentage time when back orders are

    possible =B/Q=10/100= 0.1expected number of back orders=

    (B/Q)*(B/2)=0.1*5=0.5unit

    Example:

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    36/59

    Example:-D(annual demand)=1000unitQ(order quantity)=100unitB(maximum back order)=50unit , what is the

    expected delay or the average time to satisfy a unitdemand. Working days=250

    Demand rate(d)=1000/250=4units /

    dayExpected delay=[(B/Q)*(B/2)]/d =[(50/100)*(50/2)]/4 =3.125days

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    37/59

    Centralization of inventories

    Order decision rules and safety stock rules together todemonstrate their combined pressure to centralizeinventories.

    TRC=(DS/Q)+(Qh/2)+h(SS)

    D=annual demandS=setup costQ=ordered quantityh=holding cost/unit/year.= standard deviation of lead time.

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    38/59

    k= number of standard deviation of lead timedemand used to determine safety stock.

    SS= safety stock.TRC=total relevant cost.SS=kQ=(2DS/h)TRC=(2ShD)+hk

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    39/59

    N=stocking point.Di=annual demand.i=standard deviationThe decentralized relevant cost would be

    TRC={(2Sh )} + {hk i}

    Assuming that h and k , we could centralize theseinventories at one location. Ignoring transportation costs,the total relevant costs would be

    TRC=(2Sh)D+hk where =( ) Di

    =

    N

    i 1

    Di =

    N

    i 1

    D =

    N

    i

    iD1

    =

    N

    i 1

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    40/59

    Example: two inventory locations have annual demands and costs shown.S h D k D100 10 1000 1.64 50 31.62100 10 2000 1.64 50 44.72

    The decentralized system is given byTRC={(2Sh Di)} + {hk i}TRC ={(2*100*10(1000+2000))} + {10*1.64(50+50)} =5054The centralized system is given byTRC=(2Sh)Di+hk = ( 1 *1 + 2*2 ) =70.7TRC ={(2*100*10(3000))} + {10*1.64(70.7)} =3609

    =

    N

    i 1

    =

    N

    i 1

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    41/59

    Distribution inventory

    system

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    42/59

    Level decompositon systems

    Set aggregate service level objectives for all items at anechelon.

    e.g. The objectives at the main distribution center might

    be 95% service, interpreted as a 95% fill rate. Withn items in the inventory, the problem can be statedas follows:

    minimize (unit value on the item i)(safety stock on

    the item i)Subjected to (item demand rate/aggregate demand

    rate)(item fill rate)0.95

    =

    n

    i1

    =

    n

    i 1

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    43/59

    Multiechelon systems

    Sometimes called Differentiated distribution oritem decomposition systems, focus oneffective safety stock.

    Applied to low demand rate items becausemathematics of system is complex.

    O i i ith l

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    44/59

    One origin with severaldestination

    Destination

    Origin

    S l i i i h

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    45/59

    Several origins with onedestination

    Origins

    Destination

    S l i i h ith

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    46/59

    Several origins each withseveral destination

    Origins

    destination

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    47/59

    Multiple origins and multiple

    destinations. When multiple sources shipment to several

    destinations, however solving these problem

    becomes hopelessly difficult to solve This type of problem becomesmanageable if we assume that allorigins ship their products to asingle consolidated terminal andthat all items are distributed todestination as demanded from the

    consolidated terminal.

    Several origins with a

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    48/59

    Several origins with aconsolidation terminal to

    several destinationOrigins

    destination

    consolidated terminal

    Algorithm for sol ing

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    49/59

    Algorithm for solvingproblems

    Formulas:

    Qic=

    Qcj =wheredijk= quantity of demand from origin i for destination j for product kPk= price/unit of kDi,k= demand at source ifor item k from all destinations j=Sic= cost of load from source i to consolidation terminal c

    )(

    50)(

    j k

    ijk

    j k

    ijkk

    ic

    d

    dp

    S

    I

    dj k

    ijk

    )/(

    50)(

    i k i k

    ijkijkk

    ck

    ddp

    S

    I

    di k

    ijk

    j

    ijkd

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    50/59

    Sck = cost of load from consolidation terminal c to destinations kWic=capacity of vehicle from source i to consolidation terminal c

    Wck=capacity of vehicle from consolidation terminal c to destinations kTic=lead time/travel time from source i to consolidation terminal cTck=lead time/travel time from consolidation terminal c to destinations kFic= total quantity of items flowing per period from source i to consolidation

    terminal =

    Fck= total quantity of items flowing per period from consolidation terminal c todestinations k =I = inventory carrying percentage.

    The shipping quantity from source i to consolidation terminal c is given by sic

    min[Qic,Wic]The shipping quantity from consolidation terminal c to destinations is given by scj min[Qcj,Wcj]Qic =economical shipment quantity from source i to consolidated terminal c.Qcj = economical shipment quantity from consolidated terminal c to destination j.

    j k

    ijkd

    i k

    ijkd

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    51/59

    Example: The demand for the products at destination 1 and 2 andsource of these are presented in the table. The capacity ofvehicles, relevant setup costs, lead time between locations, andother pertinent data in tables.Assume that the inventory carrying charges amount to 20% andthat the firm operates fifty periods (weeks) per year.Find the economical quantity to ship from each source to the

    terminal and from the terminal each destination.Destination demand and origin capacitydemand / period at

    Product Cost per unit Destination1 Destination2 Sourcelocation20 8 4 1

    2 25 6 10 13 25 5 8 24 30 6 8 2

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    52/59

    Setup cost, vehicle cost, and lead timedata

    Fromto

    Source 1terminal

    Source 2terminal

    Terminaldestination

    1

    Terminaldestinatio

    n 2Setupcost 45 25 30 35

    Vehiclecapacity

    150 200 150 100

    Lead time(days)

    4 2 3 4

    Solution: economical quantity to ship from each

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    53/59

    Solution: economical quantity to ship from eachsource to the terminal.Step1:calculate the total annual demand for items 1 and 2

    formula=[ ] *50[8+6+4+10]*50=1400unit Eq1Step2:calculate the average cost per part at source1.Formula=

    [(12*20)+(16*25)]/28=22.86 $ Eq2Step3: Calculate the economical shipment quantity flowing from

    source 1 to the consolidated terminal.Qic=[{ *50 }/{I( )}] Eq3

    Q1c=[(45*1400)/(0.20*22.86)]=118unitFind the minimum of Q1c and W1c.sic=min[118,150]=118unit

    j k

    ijkd

    j k j k

    ijkijkk ddp /

    )(j k

    ijkic

    dS

    j k j k

    ijkijkk ddp /

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    54/59

    Step5: calculate the quantities of individual items 1 and 2flowing from origin 1 to the consolidated terminal.

    Q1c1=( ) =(118*12)/28=51unitQ1c2=(118*16)/28=67unitStep6: repeat the calculation for source 2. following the same

    procedure, we obtain the quantities of individual items 3 and 4flowing from 2 to the consolidated terminal.

    Q2c=78unit W2c=200 s2c=min[78,200]=78unitQ2c3= (78*13)/27=38unitQ2c4=(78*14)/27=40unit

    j k

    ijk

    j

    jc dds/)(

    111

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    55/59

    The same procedure can be followed to obtain the shipmentquantities from the consolidation terminal to destination 1 and2, respectively.

    Step1: calculate the total annual demand for all items atdestination1.[ ]*50[8+6+5+6]*50=1250unit

    Step2:calculate the average cost per part at destination 1.[ ][(20*8)+(25*6)+(25*5)+(30*6)]/25=24.6$Step3:calculate the economical shipment quantity for the total

    flow from the consolidation terminal to destination.Qcj= [{ }/{I( )}]

    i k

    ijkd

    i k i k

    ijkijkk ddp /

    50)( i k

    ijkck dS i k

    ijkijk

    i k

    k ddp /

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    56/59

    Qc1= [(30*1250)/(0.2*24.6)]=87.3Step4: find minimum of Qc1 and Wc1sc1=min[87.3,150]=87.3unitStep5:calculate the quantities of individual items 1 through 4

    flowing the consolidated terminal to terminal 1.Qc11=(sc1 ) =(88*8)/25=28unitQc12=(88*6)/25=21unitQc13=(88*5)/25=18unitQc14=(88*6)/25=21unitStep6:repeat the calculation for destination 2. following the same

    procedure, we obtain the quantities of items 1 through 4 fromthe consolidation terminal to terminal2.

    i i k

    kii dd 111 /()

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    57/59

    Qc2= 102unitSc2=min[102,100]=100unitQc21= (sc2 ) ) =(100*4)/30=13unitQc22 =(100*10)/30=33unitQc23 =(100*8)/30=27unitQc24 =(100*8)/30=27unit

    i k

    ki

    i

    i dd 221 /()

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    58/59

    References

    PRODUCTION,PLANNING ANDINVENTORY CONTROL

    --S.L. NARASIMHAN --D.W. McLEAVEY --P.J. BILLINGTON

    (PRENTICE HALL OF INDIAPRIVATE LIMITED)

  • 8/7/2019 Final Aggregate Inventory(1)

    59/59

    Thank you