Upload
akshay-gupta
View
39
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The document is about microwave filters
Citation preview
Microwave Filters
Prof. D. Kannadassan,
School of Electronics Engineering
ECE102 - Microwave Engineering Fall 2012_13 1
Microwave Filters - Implementation
Richard’s Transformation
Kuroda’s Identities
General Design Procedure
N, fc, MF or ER,
IL at pass band
and Stop band
To LP,
BP, HP,
BS filters
Maximally Flat Low-pass filter – Prototype design
• Consider a two-element (2nd order) low-pass filter
• The input impedance:
• And the input reflection coefficient:
• And, Power loss ratio
• From both equation,
• Now compare this equation with “Maximally flat response” with ωc=1
• By simple algebra, [available in Pozar- pp. 392-393]
• This same procedure has been extended to calculate for higher order filters and the
lumped elements (normalized to source impedance) are tabulated.
• Two possible approached
1. First element is capacitor
2. First element is Inductor
C
IL
N
10
2010
log2
110log
ECE102 - Microwave Engineering Fall 2012_13
7
Equal Ripple LPF - prototype
• For Equal Ripple following specifications are important
– Stop band IL (dB) - IL
– Ripple Magnitude (dB) - R
– Cut-off frequency- fc
• From these, the order of the filter can be calculated:
C
R
IL
N
1
20
201
cosh
110
110cosh
Example
• Solution:
– Actually we have to calculate the order of the filter
• IL=20dB at 11GHz, fC=8GHz
C
IL
N
10
2010
log2
110log
4
44.3
811log2
110log
10
20
20
10
N
N
ECE102 - Microwave Engineering Fall 2012_13
10
Scaling of fC and Z0
• Scaling of cut-off frequency and source impendence is given as
• For capacitance:
• For Inductance
C
kk
LRL
0'
C
kk
R
CC
0'
Example
• Design a maximally flat low-pass filter with a cut off frequency of 2 GHz,
impedance of 50 Ω, and at least 30 dB insertion loss at 3 GHz.
• Solution:
• Order of the filter for the given specification
521.4
log2
110log
10
2010
C
IL
N
Filter Implementation
• Lumped elements can’t be suitable for
Microwave Frequencies, because:
– Lumped elements loose it original value at
higher frequencies
– The sizes are comparable with wave length
of operation which will give spurious
response
– Accurate designs are much complicated.
• For these reasons, and more, we are going
for “Equivalent Transmission Line design”
• Two Implementation procedures:
– Richard’s Transformation and Kuroda’s Identities
– Stepped Impedance method
Richard’s Transformation
• The frequency transformation: (ω to Ω domain)
For example
Z0=L Z0=L
Z0=1/C Zero length
Kuroda’s Identities
• These identities are introduced to reduce the practical difficulties in circuit
implementations
• Physically separate transmission line stubs
• Transform series stubs into shunt stubs, or vice versa
• Change impractical characteristic impedances into more realizable ones
Example
• Design a third order LPF with equal Ripple of 3dB at the pass band.
g1=3.3487=L1
g2=0.7117=C2
g3=3.3487=L3
• Prototype Structure
• Apply Richard’s Transformation:
• Now,
• In order to use “Kuroda’s identities”, we need series lines. (Don’t confuse the small
series line, they are actually to separate the stubs, have zero length)
• Adding “Unit line of λ/8 length” – will give series line and improve the perforance
Kuroda’s identities Next step
n2=1+Z2/Z1=1.299
Finally:
Multiply the lines with Z0
Typical
Problem-1 • Design a LPF with only shunt stubs, for the cut-off frequency of 10GHz. Calculate
the insertion loss at 13GHz. Assume the normalized filter elements as follow:
Problem-2
Problem-3