19
Figure 3.1. Sampling methodology

Figure 3.1. Sampling methodology

  • Upload
    hester

  • View
    37

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Figure 3.1. Sampling methodology. Figure 3.2. An overview of a typical Abies forest (photograph R.Bobbink). Figure 3.3. Open Pinus hartwegii forest near the timberline in the Iztac-Popo area (photograph R.Bobbink). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.1. Sampling methodology

Page 2: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.2. An overview of a typical Abies forest (photograph R.Bobbink).

Page 3: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.3. Open Pinus hartwegii forest near the timberline in the Iztac-Popo area (photograph R.Bobbink).

Page 4: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.4. Alpine bunchgrasslands (“zacatonal”) near the Iztaccíhuatl (photograph R.Bobbink).

Page 5: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.5. Increase (left) and decrease (right) in fragmentation of the vegetation in the period 1986 to 1997. For a description of the method used,

see text chapter 3.

Page 6: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.6. NDVI map of 1986.

Page 7: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.7. NDVI map of 1997.

Page 8: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.8. Pattern of changes in vegetation types from 1986 (top left) to 1997 (bottom

right) for the northern part of the Iztaccíhuatl. Black lines indicate roads.

Page 9: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.9. Small-scale logging and collecting of trees still occurs in the Iztac-Popo area

(photograph R. Bobbink).

Page 10: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.10. Cutting small pieces out of the basal trunk of Pinus trees (“ocoteo”). This is done because these pieces with high resin content easily set fire. The weakened trees can become infected by an indigenous mistletoe (Arcethobium spp) (photographs R.

Bobbink).

Page 11: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.11. Picture of a large fire, even above the timberline, in the completely

restricted area of the Iztac-Popo area (photograph R. Bobbink).

Page 12: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.12. Overview of a heavily grazed Pinus hartwegii stand in

the Iztac-Popo area at ca. 3500 m (photograph by R. Bobbink).

Page 13: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.13. Risk of erosion.

Page 14: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.14. Overview of a highly eroded slopes at ca. 2800 m at the south-east part of the Iztac-Popo

area (photograph by R. Bobbink).

Page 15: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.15. Photochemical smog reaching the foothills of the Iztac-Popo area. Photograph has

been taken at 2950 m on the western site of the mountains (R. Bobbink).

Page 16: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.16. Vegetation and landuse cover after supervised classification of the Landsat-

MSS image from January 1986.

Page 17: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.17. Vegetation and landuse cover after supervised classification of the Landsat-

TM image from February 1997.

Page 18: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.18. Pattern of all observed transitions between 1986 and 1997 in the direction of decreasing

forest density ('deforestation') above 2500 masl. For definition of the 5 combined vegetation classes, see text in chapter 3.

Page 19: Figure 3.1.  Sampling methodology

Figure 3.19. Pattern of all observed transitions between 1986 and 1997 in the direction of increasing forest density ('afforestation') above 2500 masl. For definition of the 5 vegetation classes, see text in

chapter 3.