4
Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates . Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements.

Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates. Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates. Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements

Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates .

Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements.

Page 2: Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates. Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements

Figure 3. - Final parametrical models of the metallic implants.

Figure 4. - Orthopaedic plates bended in the CAD software.

Page 3: Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates. Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements

Figure 5 - Two orthopaedic systems for the cubitus fracture.

Figure 6 - Stress maps for different orthopaedic situations in case of cubitus fracture.

Figure 7 - Othopaedic systems for main humerus fractures

Page 4: Figure 1. - Images with orthopaedic plates. Figure 2. - Additional graphical shapes made for the accurate measurement of the geometrical elements

Figure 8 – Dynamic stress and displacement maps for othopaedic systems for main humerus fractures .

Figure 9 – Diagrams for different types of osteosynthesis.

Comparing diagram for the maximum displacement values in humerus for

diff erent types of osteosyntesis

0

2

4

6

8

10

0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2

time [s]