Upload
sarai
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan. Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan. Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan. River Status. Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan. River Data. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan
Name Figile Water Management Unit
Area 639 km2
River Basin District South Eastern RBD
Main Counties Offaly, Kildare
Protected Areas
Ballynafagh Bog SACBallynafagh Lake SACMouds Bog SACPollardstown Fen SACThe Long Derries SAC
Sectoral Total Phosphorus Source (This does not imply impact)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
%
Figile Water Management Unit Action PlanSTATUS/IMPACTS
Overall status 16 River Water Bodies - 1 Good, 5 Moderate, 9 Poor, 1 Bad. No lakes.
Status elements
Q score dictates overall status, except for 1 bad WB where fish reduces the status from poor to bad, Phys Chemical status ranges from high to moderate where monitored. The status for 2 moderate, and 4 poor sites were extrapolated. Chemical status not monitored.
Possible Impacts - EPA Water Quality 2004
CLONCUMBER STREAM - The Cloncumber or Pollardstown Stream was heavily
silted in its upper reaches and eutrophic in its lower reaches in late August 2003.
*Siltation plus suspected ground water effects. Waterbody code: SE_14_1870 / 09
Status: Poor (Based on Q value 3)
CUSHINA - Heavy usage by watering animals is suspected as being the most likely
cause of the further deterioration and the unsatisfactory condition of the upper river
(0050) but, as indicated by the ‘Fair’ (Q4) quality at Stations 0080 and 0100, the
lower half was likely to have been satisfactory in 2003. Waterbody Code:
SE_14_1875 / 09 status: Moderate (Based on Q value 3-4)
DAINGEAN - A significant improvement was recorded below Daingean (0200) in
2003; serious pollution was no longer indicated at that point but further recovery will
be required before satisfactory conditions are restored there. The unsatisfactory
condition of the upper river was indicated by poor biological indicators and by the
very low DO (21%) recorded at Island Bridge (0100) at the time of this survey. A
minor improvement was recorded near Esker Bridge (0520) but a marked
deterioration in the lower reaches was indicated by the complete absence of insect
life formerly present at Station 0600. Overall condition unsatisfactory. Waterbody
Code; SE_14_1561 / 2009 Status: Poor (Based on Q value 2-3)
ESKER STREAM - As indicated by the unbalanced macroinvertebrate fauna and
also by the DO values recorded (55% & 73%) conditions were assessed as
unsatisfactory at both locations surveyed in 2003. Has deteriorated since 2000.
Agriculture suspected. Waterbody Code: SE_14_239 / WB status 09; Poor (Based on
Q value 3)
FIGILE - The overall quality situation in the Figile River in August 2003 was
unsatisfactory and was unchanged in comparison with its condition in 2000. The
uppermost surveyed location (0050) was again seriously polluted by suspected
industrial and/or sewage discharges which are suspected as polluting the river for a
considerable distance downstream i.e., to Cushaling Bridge (0100) and beyond. DO
values recorded at the locations listed above were, respectively, 50%, 68%, 63%,
60%, 66% and 119%. Waterbody Code: SE_14_987 -2009 status: Bad (Based on bad fish status)
SLATE – The Slate River was seriously polluted by suspected sewage and domestic
wastes in its upper reaches (0020) in late August 2003 and as the Q ratings at Ford
and Agar Bridges (0050, 0100) indicate, quality remained significantly depressed for
a considerable distance downstream. DO values recorded at the upper three stations
were, respectively, 15%, 30% and 79% at the time of this survey. Indications at
Stations 0150 and 0210 are of considerable eutrophication in the middle and lower
reaches and only the lowermost section (0300) could be considered satisfactory.
Waterbody Code: SE_14_999 / WB status 2009: Poor (Based on Q value 3)
PRESSURES/RISKS
Nutrient sources 94% of TP is Diffuse, with 56% from Agriculture and 30% from Unsewered Properties
Point pressures 12 WWTP (Coill Dubh, Milltown (1), Milltown (2), Rathangan, Robertstown, Bracknagh, Clonbullogue, Clonygowan, Daingean, Walsh Island, Ticknevin, Allenwood);
3 WTP (Daingean, Toberdaly, Walsh Island);
4 Section 4s (Enterprise park, Quarry, Car Wash, Building Production.
8 IPPC – 4 private companies, Meat Plant, 2 Power Plants, Research Centre.
4 EPA Licensed Waste Facilities
Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTP) and Industrial Discharges
At risk:
Coill Dubh WWTP
Milltown, Kildare WWTP
Rathangan WWTP
Robertstown WWTP
Clonbullogue WWTP
Clonygowan WWTP
Daingean WWTP –
Walsh Island WWTP
Quarries, Mines & Landfills
There are 14 Quarries.
Agriculture The majority of the area of the WMU is at risk from Agriculture
On-site systems There are 6285 septic tanks in this WMU, none of them are posing a risk to water quality due to their density, location and unsuitable hydrogeological conditions.
Forestry No waterbodies at risk from forestry
Dangerous substances
No waterbodies at risk from Dangerous Substances.
Morphology 3 waterbodies are noted as 'At Risk' due to channelisation; the Barrow Drainage District (pre 1945 channelisation scheme). All 3 of these water bodies are traversed by the Artificial Waterbody (AWB) Grand Canal Barrow Line - SE_14_998, SE_14_999 and SE_14_1870.
Abstractions 7 Abstractions but no waterbodies at risk.
Other 2 Artificial Waterbodies - Grand Canal and Ballynafagh Reservoir
River Status
Figile Water Management Unit Action PlanSELECTED ACTION PROGRAMMENB All relevant basic measures, general supplementary measures and SEA mitigation measures apply
Point Sources See Action Table for WWTP at risk below.
INDUSTRY: Investigate Section 4s at risk.
Examine the terms of all discharge authorisations to determine whether they require review for the purpose of compliance with water body objectives including protected area objectives and environmental quality standards.
Diffuse Sources AGRICULTURE - Good Agricultural Practice Regulations and Enforcement.
Other MORPHOLOGY-SE_14_998, SE_14_999 and SE_14_1870 will all require
Channelisation Investigation to determine impact.
OBJECTIVES
Restore/Protect 2015
5 water bodies
Alternative Objectives
Extended Deadlines – 11 water bodies with 2021 deadlines
3 New Modifications or Developments - Proposed peaking plant at Edenderry, Proposed waste and compost facility at Drehid, and Proposed wind farm at Ballyhugh.
HMWB/AWB - 2 AWBs in the WMU - Ballynafagh Reservoir and the Grand Canal.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
Future Pressures and Developments
Throughout the river basin management cycle future pressures and developments will need to be managed to ensure compliance with the objectives of the Water Framework Directive and the Programme of Measures will need to be developed to ensure issues associated with these new pressures are addressed.
Point Source Discharge County Priority Measure (Capital Works)
Clonygowan WWTP Offaly 2Provide tertiary treatment or relocate outfall.
Clonygowan WWTP Offaly 2Provide nutrient removal or relocate outfall.
Daingean WWTP Offaly 2Provide tertiary treatment or relocate outfall.
Derrinturn WWTP Kildare 1Provide tertiary treatment or relocate outfall.
Derrinturn WWTP Kildare 1Provide nutrient removal or relocate outfall.
Point Source Discharge County PriorityMeasure (Investigation before Capital
Works)
Walsh Island WWTP Offaly 3Investigate the need for increase in capacity of treatment plant.
Point Source Discharge County Priority MeasureDaingean WWTP Offaly 1 Implement an appropriate performance
management systemRathangan WWTP Kildare 1 Implement an appropriate performance
management systemPoint Source Discharge County Priority Measure
Allenwood WWTP Kildare 2 Investigation of CSO'sCoill Dubh WWTP Kildare 2 Investigation of CSO'sMilltown, Kildare Kildare 2 Investigation of CSO'sRobertstown WWTP Kildare 2 Investigation of CSO'sDaingean WWTP Offaly 3 Investigation of CSO's
Point Source Discharge County Priority MeasureAllenwood WWTP Kildare 2 Ensure capacity of treatment plant is not
exceededRobertstown WWTP Kildare 2 Ensure capacity of treatment plant is not
exceeded
High
Good
Moderate
Poor
Bad
Yet to be determined
River Data
Figile Water Management Unit Action Plan
Member State Code
Monito
red Y
(E
xtra
pola
ted N
)
Donor W
ate
rbody
Macro
inverte
bra
tes (Q
)
Fresh
Wate
r Pearl
Musse
l
Fish
Phyto
benth
os
(Dia
tom
s)
Morp
holo
gy
Specifi
c Polu
tants
Physio
-chem
ical
Eco
logica
l Sta
tus
Chem
ical S
tatu
s
Specia
l Are
a o
f Conse
rvatio
n
Specia
l Pro
tectio
n
Are
a
Nutrie
nt S
ensitiv
e
Wate
rs
Drin
kin
g W
ate
r
Obje
ctive
Date
obje
ctive to
be a
chie
ved
SE_14_1161 N SE_14_999 P GES 2021
SE_14_152 Y M M M Y GES 2015
SE_14_1561 Y P M P GES 2021
SE_14_1737 N SE_14_239 P GES 2021
SE_14_1824 N SE_14_1875 M GES 2015
SE_14_1870 Y P H P Y GES 2021
SE_14_1875 Y M G M GES 2021
SE_14_1939 N SE_14_239 P GES 2021
SE_14_23 N SE_14_987 P GES 2021
SE_14_239 Y P P GES 2021
SE_14_276 Y G H G GES 2009
SE_14_938 N SE_14_998 M GES 2015
SE_14_987 Y P B M B GES 2021
SE_14_997 N SE_14_239 P GES 2021
SE_14_998 Y M M M GES 2015
SE_14_999 Y M G P Y GES 2021
IE_SE_Figile
Biological Elements Supporting Elements Protected Areas
This table outlines water body information including status and a breakdown of its elements, protected areas, objectives and timescales.