Fighting Talk - 03

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    1/20

    FIGHTING

    Fighting fascism in the nineties8100d and Honour

    Smash the Asylum 8illl

    The ANL's French farce

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    2/20

    F I G,H TIN G TA LK

    f or ce s inarnoxlmise their im pact. It hod becom ecleor thdtthisw q~ l~ be .r I) ~i[$ tr9 J! ='9 yq ~ile t:1

    . '. . 9 i ? ! J bits h eY d6yin to ndo oibut it still r epresen ts a m ossha ~;;;c ilbe ite na sm all an d loc al sc ale. T he result sho wsthotthe B NP is n9 10riger isolated, at least in this port ofLondon;

    In sh ~rt, th~ resuitT nTow er H am le ts m ark s0 quoli-ta tiv e b rEK Ik th r9 ~g h fo r th e ( gs cists. T hi3 ir t as k ~ ow is toturn thofell : lCtorcil suppgrt}rlo 'ancict iveorgonisotionalfarce. Ird8esriotn~d tdbespelt out w hot thofw ouldmean i f t hey;~~r eI6suoceed .... E lsew here/lhe B Np and N F did not do Sdw elJ/Q ut

    neither did they expect to do so. Even so, in a wholenum ber of constituencies, the fascists polled betw een

    Racism 15TheP'ob iem wi th ARA 's s tr at egy p lu s t heTortes ond the AsylumBi l l

    Rewew 18AFAge t1V land press) exposure!

    Ih.. r",,,I.inn,iticnn,r,, o f t hegdlbe grasped, " . 'the,of the left and the overoll dh

    I p 6I it ic :6 J;i ly pi ip n, \ ... .'t he . ..ComrT{dh .i s( ?~~ o fG re (l t. x

    r it a lig '~ t6 :: l8 .i j~a ; ;,didbte , .lnn area which once booSted; :a COP lT ll iQ js lr na yo r a nd0 Commun is t, y. p, t b~ypoHe (jFbo re lybl i: iQ lbp ft \16 BNPYq te il 1 t he Be tpQ t1 .I .G r een C lnd?S tep l1 ey t8h! tr tJ ehc: y!Bdr el y a t en th o ft heYa teI... h~fascists 0 ' ( jot ipg ondgroWipginthis ,soliSl' '.

    working" ;v.;h!I~Jh~i~volu IyJeft isdoi?gerous ly i .. . i8 (j .JUdgea 'inC

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    3/20

    With more

    organisations

    and individuals

    now apparently

    taking the

    growth of

    .fascism

    seriously it is

    appropriate

    once again topose the

    question of

    what kind of

    anti-fascist

    movement weneed, argues

    Joe Blakey

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    AntiFASCISTJ4i!(Jtl

    Fightingfacism in the nineties

    Anti-Fascist Action has a clearposition, distinct from the other

    organisations which aim to f ight the

    fascis ts. We believe that our

    perspective is the correct one, and

    the only one which can be eff ective

    against the fascists . When we

    criticise the Anti -Nazi League, the

    Anti-Racist Al liance or other groups it

    is not because of any nar row

    sectarianism - we criticise them

    because their activities are ineffec-

    tive, and in the f ight against fascism,

    ineffectiveness is dangerous.

    AFA is not a protest movement,

    content to shout slogans at the

    foscists f rom behind the pol ice l ines.

    Our intention is to plan activi ties that

    w ll make it as hard as possible for

    them to operate in working class

    areas. Unlike some anti-fascist

    organisations, our opposition to the

    f ascists is not based on the fact that

    they are "nasty" or "evil" people,

    nor indeed just because they are

    racist, but because they ore the

    enemes of the progressive working

    class movement.It has always been the function

    of the fascists to divide the working

    class, and then smash all progres-

    sive elements. Dont forget, the first

    people in the concentration camps

    in Nazi Germony were the lef t.

    In this country, the main tactic

    (but not the only one) the fascis ts use

    to divide worki ng class people is

    racism. They recrui t people to the

    idea of racial unity at the expense

    of working class uni ty. The 11,821

    votes the fascists got in the general

    election, and in par ticular the 2,500

    votes the BNP polled in the solidly

    working closs East End of London,

    show that some sections of the white

    working closs ore ready to turn to

    the fascists, rather than to the

    revolutionory left, as 0 radical

    alternative to the present system.

    Why do they do this? And

    more importantly, how can this

    process be checked and then

    reversed?

    The fact is that the left has

    fai led to build a credible alternative

    in the eyes of its natural constituency

    - the working class. As capita lism

    goes deeper into crisis, and as the

    traditional parties pile on the

    pressure to make the working class

    pay for the crisis, the lack of aradical lef t a lternative creates a

    vacuum in which the far right can

    operate. Their gain is aur loss.

    The fight against fascism cannot

    be a simple matter of def ending the

    present system, but must at the same

    time be a fight against capitalism in

    all its f orms. AFA is a united front,

    not a political party. Within AFA.

    there are groups and individuals

    from a wde range of politicalbackgrounds, from anarchists

    through to socialists and communists.

    Our aim is to create the space in

    which a genuine working class

    alternative to capitalism and fascism

    can grow.

    To do this, though, we hove to

    show worki ng class people two

    things: firstly, that fascism is their

    enemy, and secondly that we can

    stop the fascists physical ly. The

    fascists thr ive on fear and intimda-

    tion by showng people, who have

    been betrayed by a weak and

    ineffective lef t, that they - unlike the

    Continued over 3'1'lIIl Jut(;(IIl'lS'I'

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    4/20

    J

    left - can do things, that they are aparty of action. We have to showthem that they are wrong, that it isthe left that can really bring aboutchange, that the left can really makea difference.

    Unfortunately, much of what theleft does in the nome of anti-fascismdoes the opposite - it reinforces theideo that the left is weak andineffec tive whi le the fascist s def ian tlyget on with their plans.

    Look what happens when thefascists hold a public meeting, likethe one at York Hall in BethnalGreen. [see pg 7 JAll too often, theleft is content to stand on the otherside of the rood from the fascists,

    behind pol ice l ines , shoutingslogans. Meanwhile, the fascists goabout their business unmolested.What real effect does this have?What real difference does it make?

    The fact is that the BNP todayare not at all put off by havingsomeone shout "Nazi scum" atthem. This is not the 1970s, whenthe Notional Front were trying tohide their Nazi post behind arespectable image. This is the 1990swhere, on the bock of the success ofthe for right in Germany andFrance, the fascists are proud to beNazis! Their reply to the taunt"Nozi" i s to shout "cornrnie" back atyou. In the present political climate,

    How they did in the General Election

    British National Party

    Constituency Candidate Votes %

    Bethnal Green and Stepney Richard Edmonds 1,310 3.6Blaby John Peacock 521 0.880w & Poplar John Tyndall 1,107 3.0Cardiff North John Morse 121 0.3Clydesdale Steve Cartwright 342 0]Darlington Dr Donald Clarke 355 0.6Dewsbury Lady Jane Birdwood 660 1.1Edinburgh West David Bruce 133 0.3Erewash Laurence Johnson 645 1.0Peterborough Richard Heaton 311 0.5Rochdale Ken Henderson 620 1.2Southwark & Bermondsey Steve Tyler 530 1.4Uxbridge Michael O'Rourke 350 0]

    National Front

    Constituency Candidate Votes %

    Birmingham Hodge Hill Eddy Wicker 370 0.9Birmingham Yardley Pauline Read 192 0.4Bristol East Ian Anderson 270 0.5Coventry SE Norman Tomkinson 173 0.5Derby North Peter Hart 245 0.4Dudley East George Cartwright 675 1.2Ealing North John Hill 277 0.6Leeds West Bob Tenny 132 0.3Slough Andy Carmichoel 290 0.5Southwark & Bermondsey Terry Blackham 168 0.4Torbay Bob Jones 268 0.5Walsall North Ken Reynolds 614 1 .2West Bromwich West John Lord 477 1.1West Herlfordshire John McAuley 665 1.0

    Independents

    Constituency Candidate Label Votes %

    Cheltenham Melvyn Rendell Anti-Federal Europe 655 1.0Leicester East Dennis Taylor Ind Brit Homeland 308 0.6

    4 I

    d

    many will see the latter as thegreater insult.

    What is more, the fact that theopposition isn't confident enough todo more than protest peacefullyacross the rood. just reinforces thenotion that the fasci sts have theupper hand on the street. Thisencourages the potential recruits tothe BNP while demoralising thepotential opposition.

    When the fascists hold meet-ings, it is possible to do a lot morethan hide behind crash barriers. InGlasgow and Rochdale, ant i- fascist swere able to completely disrupt BNPmeetings because AFA set out fromthe very start to confront the fascists.The difference here is that while theANL and ARA set out to simplyprotest at the fascists' presence, weset out to stop them.

    These successes were modepossible by a combination of goodinte ll igence work, careful planning ,and the level of commitment neces-sary to physically drive the fascistsout. In the 1970s a number offascist meetings were also stoppedby occupying the hal l beforehand,but even this tactic doesn't seem tobe on the agenda for these othergroups.

    When the fascists try to operate"on the st ree t" , every anti -fascistactivity should be designed to, atbest, stop them, or, at least, disruptthem. The fascists have to bechallenged, otherwise you havemissed the point of how theyoperate. The horder it is for them towork freely in on orea, the less theywill be able to do. Their numbers

    are s ti ll small , but unless ant i- fascist

    activity does make it hard for them,they will grow - and the more theygrow, the harder it will be to stop

    them.It is not possible to go into all

    the tactical options in on article likethis, but anti-fasci sts should start togive serious thought as to how tostop fascists activities. Assemblypoints for marches can be occupied,paper sole pitches con be taken -over, travel to and from events canbe made difficult. Not everyone hasto be in the some place either-after all, why make it easy for thepolice to hem you in.

    The guidi ng principle behindevery activity must be to try toimplement a policy of "No Platform

    F IG HT IN G TALK

    I

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    5/20

    , FIGHTING FASCISM IN THE NINETIES

    Whereyou c a n

    vote B N PBo w & Popl.f rl~, / J y W IO HN HNOAlL OHM PEACOCKB,thnll ' GrBetl &

    ~

    flll""sh

    ~AURENCE J OHN SON! ~~n ; ,ODMONDS

    SouthwlJrk &

    ~

    Ro c h d l l J I \!lJrrnondsllr KEN HENDERSONS T EV E TY lE R

    ~O.w,b",y q~~~~:l' R O U RK E Lady JANE BIRDWOOO ,- ,

    C "d if f N or th

    RDariingtDn 1 1O liN M O RS E O r. D ON AlD C LA RK E

    P, l I J /borough

    '1ClrdBSdil/tI

    IAIC HA RD H EA TON S lE V E C A RT W R IG H i, ! v- ,: ; ,. I : ~ : . :~:~ : ; : : :~ I~=~~ f ~ r , ~ : c ~ s tI. ? y~ . t f : ~~~~~7?

    up the road hoping to Gad that the

    fascists leave them alone, they just

    expose their weakness.

    Remember, this was is the area

    where an anti-racist march was

    attacked last year by fascists who

    were able to mobilise and lead

    hundreds of locals, an area where

    sections of the white working class

    see the fascists as the radical

    alternative, not the left. Tolerating

    their presence every week wll not

    change this trend in the slightest.

    Accommodating the fascists in effect

    makes them an acceptable part of

    the political agenda - and that is

    the thin end of the wedge.Stopping the fascists being

    openly able to sell their papers does

    not get rid of the problem, of

    course, but leaving them alone is a

    sure fire way to help them grow and

    to make sure the problem gets

    worse. It i s vi ta l to deny the fascis ts

    the opportunity to operate freely and

    openly. That is why, for example,

    AFA and Cable Street Beat moved

    quickly to drive the nee-Nazi music

    organisation Blood and Honour

    underground again when they

    started to operate openly in

    Carnaby Street. This was a double

    victory - it made it harder for them

    to distribute their stuff, and it

    showed their supporters that they

    were too weak to do anything about

    it.Of course, while anti-fascists

    should gear their activi ties to

    confronting the fascists when they

    appear in public, there is alsa plenty

    of opportunity for non-confrontational

    activi ties at other times. It should not

    be a question of "either-or" . Both

    approaches must be used to

    complement each other. AFA has

    shown its commtment to this dual

    approach - physical and ideologicalopposi tion - since i t was launched.

    Carnivals, marches, meetings, gigs,

    educational activities and sa on are

    integral parts of our strategy, but

    they are never a substi tu te for what

    is necessary when the fascists take

    to the streets - physical opposition.

    One mstake that is commonly

    made by anti-fascists is to call for

    sta te bans on fascist groups and

    activi ties. When the Publ ic Order

    Act was f irst introduced in the

    1930s, i ts procla imed purpose was

    to curb Moseley's fascist Blackshirt

    movement. In reality, the Act was

    AntiFASCIST,_ttil[.)~1

    used against the left, and it has

    continued to be used to this end

    ever since. In simple terms, if fascists

    are banned, mlitant anti-fascists wll

    also be banned, if their marches are

    banned, then sa w ll ours be. Such

    appeals end up providing the state

    w th extra weapons to clamp down

    on the lef t.

    Not only that, but the very fact

    that we coli on the capitalist state to

    come in and do our dirty work for

    us reinforces the notion that we are

    too weak to deal w th the fascists

    ourselves. Once again, th is is not

    only ineffective but counter-produc-

    tive. We need to w n young

    working class people to the f ight

    against fascism by offer ing them the

    opportunity to f ight for their own

    interests. We can t do that by

    calling on their class enemy - the

    police - to do the job for them.

    There is one fi nal

    for the Foscists" . What is the point

    of hovinq a demonstration against

    f ascism if the f ascists are going to

    be left free to organise a march two

    hours later? It has happened! Anti-

    fascist activity must confront the

    fascists, not accommodate them.

    It is revealing to look at the

    response of same members ofcertain left wng groups (no prizes

    for guessing which ones) when AFA

    took the Bermondsey paper sale

    pitch away from the NF and BNP

    during the election campaign.

    One local who watched while

    the NF candidate was unceremoni-

    ously sent packing told AFA mem-

    bers that " it was about time some-

    one sor ted that lot out." Unfor tu-

    nately, our "revolutionary" friends

    did not share these saund working

    class instincts. Instead, they told us

    thot it wos alright for us, but that

    next week they would have to facethe consequences when they tr ied to

    sell their papers next to the fascis ts.

    On paper, these organisations

    recognise that the fascists' a im is to

    smash all working class organisa-

    tions, but in practice they are happy

    to tolerate the presence of fascist

    paper sellers standing next to them,

    to allow fascists a free ride in a

    working class .ar ea - in short,

    anything for a quiet life. Now, if

    they believe in a policy of live and

    let live, that is up to them but when

    they talk about " smashing the

    Nazis" but in reality stand meekly

    point that needs to be

    emphasised here.

    AFA believes that it is

    absolutely critical to

    focus propaganda on

    the potential recruits

    to f ascism - the white

    working class. All too

    often, anti-fascist

    groups seem to write

    off the white working

    closs as a lost couse,

    when they should be

    putting out propa-

    ganda aimed at

    exposing the BNP's

    "Rights for Whites"

    rhetoric.

    Organ isations

    which wont confront

    the fascists physically are a perfect

    home for liberals and armchair

    socialists. They are cross-class

    alliances and debating societies.Any mlitant anti-fascists who may

    have joined them in the hope ofactually f ighting fascism should stop

    wasting their time, and should

    instead join up w th AFA, the only

    notional organisation wth the tactics

    and strategy that can actually make

    a difference.

    AFA is an organisation for

    activists, not a talking shop, and we

    see a need for a realignment in the

    anti-fascist movement. If you want to

    protest f rom the sidel ines, join the

    other groups. If you want to make a

    real impact on the fascists, join AFA. 5

    The fascistshave to bechallenged,

    otherwise youhave missed the

    point of howthey operate.The harder it is

    for them towork freely in

    an area, the lessthey will beable to do.

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    6/20

    Members of Anti-Fascist Action around thecountry have been busy since the last issue ofFighting Talk appeared. Here we report on some

    of the activities we have been involved in.

    AFA takeson BNP in

    Rochdale

    6

    On the morning of Saturday 28

    March a group of AFAactiviststook over the paper selling pitchusually shared by the BNP, NF,and SWP in Bermondsey gain-ing the support of many localpeople in the process. The ac-tion was a complete successdespite the BNP taking a latedecision to peddle their poisonin the Roman Road area of EastLondon.

    Later the same day we par-ticipated in the "March for Jus-tice" in Newham called by,amongst others, the NewhamMonitoring Project (NMP) to

    protest at a racist killing andon-going state harassment ofblack and Asian peaple.

    However, the afternooncommenced with a visit by thepolice to the AFA rendezvouspoint where they suggestedthat the march organisers didnot want us around. This wascompletely untrue. In fact theNMP welcomed our contingentonto the march, and placed uswith the left groups just aheadof the Anti-Nazi League (ANL)participants.

    The ANL were clearly dis-

    In their post-election issue of Spearhead, the BritishNotional Party (BNP) boosted that they hod held two"successful" rallies during their campaign. They hodhoped it would be three. But the attempt to hold one inRochdale, where ex-Tory Ken Henderson was the BNPcandidate, came to grief on 4 -April,

    Most of the BNP's top bross, including RichardEdmonds and John Peacock, went to Rochdale to boostHenderson's campaign. But Anti-Fascist Action upsettheir plans to stage a gala race-hate meeting.

    AFA mobilised over 200 people to oppose the BNPrally. We even successfully managed to persuade theANL to join a demonstration at the fascists' redirectianpaint, rather than simply give out leoAets miles awayfrom them.

    The fasciststhought that they would get an easyride. After al l, their fr iends in the police had arrestedleading AFA activists and raided their homes theevening prior to the AFA counter-demo (only for them tobe released without charge after the demonstration).They hoped this would take the st ing out of our protest.It didn't.

    Having occupied their first redirection point anddriven away a number of BNP thugs who were being

    ANL demonstratetheir sectarianismmayed at the arrival of the AFAcontingent and when the marchwas moving ANL stewardscalled on their contingent toslow down and open a gapbetween us and them.

    ANLstewards then told thepolice that they feared we

    would aHack them. They re-quested that the police join themarch as a buHer between AFAand the ANL Neither AFAmem-bers nor the NMP stewardscould believe thisl The marchorganisers immediately de-manded that the ANLwithdrawtheir invitation to the police, thatthe police leave the demonstra-tion and that the ANLstop cre-ating a divide in the march.

    The ANLdid close the gapbetween the contingents thoughthey continued to discouragethose marching behind their

    banner from either talking toor mixing with the Anti-FascistAction demonstrators.

    It is ironic that the so-calledrevolutionaries of the Anti-NaziLeague find it impossible to ac-cept AFA invitations to speakon our platforms, do not want

    to march with us in defianceand opposition to police har-assment of the Asian commu-nity, but see no problem in in-viting the police to march withthem.

    The damage to the anti-fas-cist movement this sort of sec-torian behaviour does cannotbe under-estimated. Now, withthe growing success of the farright throughout Europe and inBritain in the general election,is the time for maximum unityto reverse the tide of fascistgrowth.

    ']

    F IG HTIN G TALK

    I

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    7/20

    A FA IN AC TIO N

    bussed in for the rally, AFA learnt

    that the main fascist force hod

    moved to another pub. Immediately

    we argued that the demonstration

    should follow them.

    Once AFA arrived at this pub

    we made our presence felt and after

    a vigorous encounter in the pub wth

    the master race's goon squad we

    left them cowering inside awaiting

    police protection. When the bulk of

    the other counter.demonstrotors

    arrived we simply surrounded the

    pub, wthstood police attempts to

    clear us off and kept the fascists

    pinned down for almost three hours.

    Finally, instead of a rally, the

    fascists were escor ted out of town

    by the police, ta ils between their

    legs and w th the shouts of AFA

    members ringing in their ears.

    Memories of AFA's actions at their

    "secret" rendezvous were still

    ringing in quite a few of the BNP's

    heads!

    The BNP's failed attempt to hold

    a rally showed the effectiveness ofAFA's strategy in confronting the

    fascists. But the 620 (1.2%) votes

    Henderson got in the election shows

    that he does have a base in

    Rochdale and much more work

    needs to be done to counter this. In

    particular, the need to build AFA's

    inf luence in Rochdale i tsel f - much

    of the work in the electian and

    before hovlnq been done by

    Manchester AFA - is urgent.

    With this in view AFA has

    followed up its success w th a

    concerted leafleting campoign in the

    area and has continued to mobi lise

    against the BNP's attempts to

    capitalise on their vote.

    On 25 April news that

    Henderson and his gang were

    plannng to leoflet a local estate

    resul ted in 120 anti -fascists f rom all

    over the north assembling in

    Rochdale to stop them. Once again

    the fascists were pinned down in

    one of their watering holes by AFA,

    this time having to make their

    getaway (w th palice protection of

    course) on foot. Their "littlebarough

    High School Bus" (which they

    bought in an auction) was ill no fit

    state to be driven followng the

    demonstration.

    Unfortunately, the followng

    week the fascists did manage to

    hold a rally on the steps outside

    Rochdale Tawn Hall. This was a

    blow ta anti-fascists in the area,

    because up ta that point we had

    quite clearly kept the BNP on the

    run. However, it was largely due to

    a lost mnute change of plans by

    fascists, who by now were terrified

    of meeting up wth AFA yet again,

    and their col lusion wth the police.

    AFA leafleted the estate where

    the rally was supposed to be taking

    place but by the time we found autwhere the BNP were they had a

    strong line of blue standing between

    them and us. Mind you it was

    standing between them and the

    "public" they were supposed to be

    addressing, so all was not lost.

    All three events do point to the

    need to build AFA in Rochdale. The

    BNP have clear ly made Rochdale

    one of their northern pr ior ities. But

    there are hopeful signs. It is vital that

    a solid anti-fascist presence, bUilding

    on this, is organsed to chal lenge

    them.

    AntiFA S C I S TMil['tl

    For SaleWell maintained, low mleage Vaux-

    hal l Carl ton car

    Many extras inch~ing: Custom paint job professionally

    applied courtesy of Ealing Anti-

    Fascist Paint Shop

    Low profile tyres supplied by West

    London Wheel Services

    Generally in good condition

    One previous (Nazi) owner

    Apply to Ian Anderson c/o the

    National f ront office

    Anti-Fascist Action currently hasno branch in the West London area.

    The above advertisement, recently

    received, indicates the potential for

    organsing in the area. Interested

    anti-fascists in West London should

    contact AFA wth a view to setting

    up a branch to challenge the BNP

    and NF for this area.

    7ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    BNP York HallrallyThe centrepiece of the BritishNational Party's general election

    campaign in Londons East End was

    a rally held in York Hall, Bethnal

    Green, on Monday 6 April. It was a

    show of strength for them in the

    area they had given top priority to,

    and a clear provocation, so it was

    absolutely necessary that anti-fascists

    mount a serious challenge.

    As well as the mobilisation by

    Anti-Fascist Action, both the Anti

    Nazi League (ANL) and the Anti

    Racist Alliance (ARA) staged protests

    against the rally.

    The ANL and ARA demonstra-

    tion attracted a substantia l crowd -

    they outnumbered the fascists by

    around three to one. Unfortunately,

    but unsurprisingly, the ANL and ARA

    were content to stage their demon-

    I fi,,",'

    strations in the space al located to

    them by the police - on the other

    side of the road f rom the meeting,

    behind the police crash barriers.

    This decision effectively ruled

    out any real conf rontation wth the

    fascists. To have disrupted the

    meeting from where they were

    standing, they wauld have f irst had

    ta fight through the police lines,

    something the organsers clear ly had

    no intention of doing. Indeed, the

    ANL stewards were so passive that

    when the pal ice snatched individuals

    from the crowd they stood by and

    let them do it.

    Th is type af post uri ng has na

    effect on the fascists. In fact, it

    simply conf irms what they say - that

    the left are too weak and taa

    Continued over

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    8/20

    spineless to actually do anythingabout them. The ANl and ARAwatched the BNP march in, and thefew who were left at the endwatched them march out again.What is the poin t in that?

    Rother than boycott the passivedemo, AFA supporters went along toargue for a more confrontationalapproach with any genuine workingcloss youth who might have beenthere.

    At the some time we used ourlimited resources to make sure thatthe fascistswere disrupted in someway, even though alone we werenot in a position to stop theirmeeting taking place.

    Hoving found out where theBNP were planning to go drinkingafter the ral ly (the Weavers ' Arms innearby Roman Rood - used regu-larly by the BNP throughout theirelection campaign) AFA occupiedthe pub.

    When the fascists marched outof the meeting under police escort

    they were token to the Weavers'Arms, no doubt as arranged. AFAstood its ground outside the pubwhile the BNP, which hod maybethree times as many as AFA by thisstage, hod to march by and makealternative plans far the eveni ng'sdrinking. While not a big victory initself, this incident does raises threeimportant issues.

    Firstly, it clearly demoralised thelocal working closs youth the BNPhod attracted to their meeting. Theyexpected to seethe left watch onpassively while the BNP went onwith it pions. Instead, despite theirsuperior numbers, despite theirbragging, despite their reputation as"men of action", the BNP hod to becontent to watch powerlessly ratherthan drive AFA out of "their" pub. Inshort, they were not up to the job ofgetting rid of us. .

    Secondly, as noted in a rotherconfused way in the press, this smallgesture of defiance by AFA was notlost on the locals watching from their

    CARFisproducedbyan independentnon-party political collective whichhasprovided onti-rocistcnd anti-fascistmaterials to the movement for 14years

    Price:BOpor 1 yeor subscriptions7.50 from:

    eARF, BM Box 8784,London we 1N 3XX

    I

    l I BUn I

    ~ G A l i H

    Price: 1 .5 0

    Subscriptions 1 year):Individuols lB.OOConcessions 13Organisatians 26

    Sendcheques(payable toSearchlight):

    S ea rc hlig ht M a ga zin e L td ,37b New Cavend ish St,

    London Wl M 8JR

    There was a time when therewas only one candidate forthe tit le of chief fascist pave-ment kisser - Tony "Tarmac"Lecomber, who could boastthat he was always on thestreet (normally face down).

    With Lecomber temporarilyout of the (af)fray - last seenin HMP Brixton - the race ison to take the vacant title.

    Which leading BNPer willemerge victorious? Will i t beSteve Tyler, who followed hisrecent (very close) examina-tion of Bermondsey street lifewith an inspection of the localhospital facilities? Or RichardEdmonds, recently seen withhis ear to the ground in KingsCross and nose all over thepavement in Bethnal Green.

    We wish Edmonds andTyler every success in thisparticular venture, althoughwe must make it clear that

    we are non-partisan and willassist each and every con-tender in the competition tobe fascist pavement kisser ofthe year.

    S E A R CH L I G H TTHE INTERNATIONAL

    ANTI-FASCISTMONTHLY

    8

    R OU GE MAGAZ IN ESubscriptions:8 individuals 16 organisationsCheques toRouge, BM Rouge,London WC 1N 3XX

    I

    S ~ X U A l i H

    windows and balconies. In fact , asmall group of youngsters come outand jeered at the BNP. AFA gavethe local working closs people ataste of what can be done, even inrelatively small numbers. The passivedemo ot York Hall did no suchthing.

    The third issue, the most generalone, concerns the central question:who actually disrupted the fascistson the day? The ANl and ARA mayhave got media coverage, whichwas probably all they were afteranyway, but the fascists themselveslaughed openly at the their impo-tence. At the Weavers ' Arms, theyhad to put a brave face on to coverup their own impotence. One tinybutreel victory like that is worth formore than passive protests behindpolice lines. Four weeks after the rolly, Eastlondon AFA mounted a picket of theWeavers' Arms after the landlordhod gone on the radio saying thatthe BNP were "good customers".

    Street cred

    F IGHT ING TALK

    r 4 1

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    9/20

    S T U D E N T S

    Lef t wing srudents in highereducotion gave the relaunch of theANL a mixed response. Some weregrateful that the largest organisationon the British far left was taking theresurgence of fascism seriously atlast. Others saw it as a cynicalattempt by the SWP to recruit newmembers. Many questioned whatpossible role the ANL had to play inadvanci ng the struggle agai nst eitherracism or fascism.

    AFA supporters in the collegesresponded by stressing the need forunity in action, while debunking theSWP's mythology of the organisa-t ion's success in the 1970s. Wealso painted to their refusal toimplement "no platform" against thefascists, and the SWP's determina-tion to ensure it kept control of theANL firmly in its own hands.

    Suddenly AFA's work began toreceive goad publicity from anunexpected quarter - the Union ofJewish Students (UJS).

    The UJS is the largest singleJewish student grouping in Britain. Itpromotes Jewish cultural identity oncampuses but i t is also an ardentdefender of the Israeli state. Itsmembers hold a range of viewsabout the current Israeli governmentbut a basic unity exists around pro-Zionist ideology.

    While individual members ofthe UJS have been outstanding AFAactivists, the organisation has notaffiliated to, or become regularlyinvolved in, AFA.

    Model motions, designed forthe National Union of Students'(NUS) spring conference, weremoved at several union generalmeetings including at the LondonSchool of Economics, Bristol Univer-sity and Manchester Poly, heaping

    praise on AFA and scorn an theANL.Many charges the UJSaimed at

    the ANL were correct . Despite SWPprotests to the contrary, the ANL hasremained its property lock, stockand barrel. But underpinning thewhole argument against the ANLwas the charge that the SWP is ananti-Semitic organisation.

    Ironically the UJS, by equatingopposition to the state of Israel withanti-Semitism, would find manyindividuals and organisations withinAFA as "culpoble" as the SWP.

    But the SWP never suggested

    AntiFA S C I S TtMil(.)~1

    AFA's student organiser looks atthe controversy sparked in manycolleges by the ANL's relaunch andfinds that the SWP have nomonopoly on sectarianism.

    Right target,wrong ammo?that ANL members had to adopt itsanti-Zionist stance. At some collegesANL bookstalls have apparentlyfeatured copies of the SWP pam-phlet, I sr ae l: The H ii ack S ta te .Butthis is merely tactical stupidity ratherthan a conscious policy of alienatingpro-Zionist Jews.

    In the 1980s the SWP commit-ted other tactical blunders, especiallyaround the banning of a zionistJewish Society at Sunderland Poly.However, they have mobilised fordemos against the desecration ofJewish cemeteries in Enfield, Wem-bley, Newham and Manchester.SWP members have been attackedverbally and phvsicolly, not just as"reds" but as "Bolshevik Jews". Amember of the SWP's sister organi-sation in Denmark was killed in Qbomb attack this March, almostcertainly carried out by fascists.

    for us in AfA a united front

    against fascism in Britain andelsewhere in Europe need notconcern itself with the issue ofZionism. Despite the many politicaldifferences separating us, the historyof racism and anti-Semitism and thereality of a crisis-ridden capitalismhave presented uswith a commonfoe whom we recognise and mustfight against as one.

    NUS spring conference rejectedsponsorship of the ANL, part ly as aresponse to the UJSmotions. Ofcourse we don't know if the argu-ments that swung votes were goodor bad ones. Public knowledge of

    madcap adventures, like the TowerHamlets leafletting session whichnearly turned into tragedy, couldn'thave done the ANL any good.Certainly, ARA supporters wouldalso have been pleased at the vote.Hopefully, however, the argumentthat the SWP, and thus the ANL, areanti-Semitic organisa-t ions was not the key.

    After years ofputting up withridicule from the SWP- which has at timeseven tried ta denyAFA's existence -giving the SWP ataste of its ownmedicine may seemonly fair to some whosupport AFA's work.But if this obstructsunity inaction it willnot advance the

    struggle against the BNP, NF andthe like.We offer the UJSas a whole

    and its individual members on openinvitation to join AFA. Butthe samedoor is open to Palestinians, Arabstudents and other anti-Zionist forces.It is also open to those SWPsupporters who recognise the needto go beyond ANL-style passiveprotest and build an anti-fascistorganisation that tries to mobiliserank and file workers to actuallyconfront the fascists and not justseek the blessings of trade unionbureaucrats and media stars.

    For us in AFA aunited frontagainst fascismin Britain andelsewhere inEurope neednot concernitself with theissue ofZionism.

    9ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    ~I

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    10/20

    10

    HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU SIC+ HATE fA SCI SM LOVEMUS I C+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS I C+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU SIC+ HAT E FAS CISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E FAS C ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVE MUS IC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E FAS CISM LOV EMUSIC + HAT E FAS CI SM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVE MUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVE MUS IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE FASC ISMLOVE MUS IC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV E MU SIC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV E MU SI C+ HAT E FAS C ISM LOV E MU SI C+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV E MU SI C+ HATE

    CAB LE STR EET B EAT R EV IEW

    The returnofBlood and Honour

    The fascist skinhead musicorganisation is back on the scene.Nick Stone looks at who they are and what they are up to

    Blood and Honour, the self-styled"nationalist anti-red music movement",is back. These self-declared champi-ons of race and nation have regainedsome degree of political prominencethrough their influence on the for rightskinhead groups emerging across post-Stalinist Europe.

    In 1990 Blood and Honour band"No Remorse" successfully toured inEurope and the USA. Swedish bond"Ultima Thule" this year headlined a"freedom rally" in Estonia. Membersof Ian Stuart Donaldson's "Skrew-driver" have been arrested while tak-ing part in fascist activities in Ger-many.

    Blood and Honour emerged in the'1980s from the ruins of the NationalFront 's Rock Against Communismmovement (RAq. At its peak RACcould organise gigs with attendanceof 500 plus, by word of mouth public-ity alone. However, the 1986 split inthe Notional Front shaltered RAC aswell, and left Donaldson along withbands such as No Remorseand Sud-den Impact, to strike out on their own.While people like the British Na-

    tional Party's (BNP) John Tyndall stilldismissed rock music as "jungle mu-sic", Donaldson had sussed that nor-mally mundane activities such as wor-shipping Rudolf Hess could be mademore appealing if supported by a fewbadly played power chords.Sudden Impoct summed it up:"Skinheads may have storted off as

    a mixed race cult listening to niggermusic, but now it's a way of life fortrue white people."The middle class left had long since

    decided that all skins were racist, giv-ing Blood and Honour a golden op-portunity to become a Trojan Horse

    for the middle class for right to recruitsome working class youth to its ranks- intervening in a youth movementwhich had originally begun as a cel-ebration of bluebeat and ska!George Marshall describes a typi-

    col Blood and Honour gig in his his-tory of the skinhead movement, Spiritof '69 (see F ig hti ng Tal k 2 ):"The atmosphere generated by

    bands like Skrewdriver and Brutal At-tack ... is nothing short of a mini-Nuremberg Rally. Hundreds of

    "Eventually there willbe a race war and we

    have to be strongenough in numbers towin it. I'll die to keepthis country pure andif it means bloodshedat the end of the day,

    then let it be."

    Ian Stuart Donaldson

    Sunday People interview

    1988

    skinheads chanting 'Seig Heil! SeigHeil!' as Ian Stuart and Ken Mclellando their bit for Adolf and country."The Blood and Honour movement

    exists primarily as on undergroundphenomenon. Most major record com-panies and distributors find the ideoof racist skinhead bands a fairly unat-tractive marketing prospect. Conse-quently Blood and Honour have builtup a production/distribution networkwith bases in Germany, France and

    England through which they markettheir wares across the world. Mostmaterial is sold by mail order. Themajor producer is Herbert Egoldt'sRock-O-Rama Records - almost all themajor Nazi bands sell records throughRock-O-Rama.In 1985 Gael Bodiks, a racist gig

    promoter, established another openlyfascist record label , Rebelles Euro-peens, in Brest, France with close tiesto Blood and Honour. As well asrecords by fascist bands, it specialisesin T-shirts, books and Nazi militarymusic. Bodiks says of his outfit:"The reasonfar itscreation was quite

    simple. No label wanted to producepolitically engaged bands without self-censorship ... I had to give them thesame opportunity to do so as otherbonds. Music is an excellent way ofspreading those ideas and it was be-coming more and more necessary tohave these skinhead bands known."Donaldson claims Rock-O-Ramahas

    helped him consolidate the fascistyouth movement across Europe, andalign it with the "old men" of the move-ment's "heyday":

    "They are some of Adolf's SS whoescaped the war trials and are nowsuccessful business men. I visit themand they visi t me at our concerts andwe discuss our common goals ... n(S u nd ay P eo pleinterview)It is clear that even at a time when

    Blood and Honour had had to retreat 'from the arena in Britain, their linkswith European fascists enabled themto help fil l the polit icoI vacuum left bythe collapse of Stalinism and the re-treat of the left across Europe.

    In Britain too, Blood and Honourhas played its part in the re-emergenceof the British Movement (BM) after

    ' I

    F IG HT IN G TALK

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    11/20

    HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATEFASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E FAS C ISM LOV EMUSIC + HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE FASC I SM LOVEMUS I C+ HATE fA SCI SM LOVEMUSI C+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUSI C+ HATE fASC ISMLOVE MUS IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV E MU SI C+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV E MU SI C+ HATE

    several years of inactivity. At the"Rights for Whites" march in Thames-mead in May 1991 Blood and Hon-our skins were seenwearing the insig-nia of the BM's ideological drivingforce, the British National Social istMovement.

    Donaldson isalso keen to foster newalliances with' the BNP. Blood andHonour and BNP members have metto discuss joint operations, while Bloodand Honour skins have providedfootsoldiers for BNP rallies and can-vassing during the general election.

    In 1982, when John Tyndalllaunched the BNP, he argued thatnationalism "was never going to makeit through the ballot box". In the me-dium term they should aim instead tobuild an organisation of 5,000 "solidtypes" which could be put out on thestreets at any time.

    Donaldson's eye to the main chanceobviously led him to believe that, byollowing his followers to be street-fighters for the BNP, he could hoponto Tyndall's bandwagon.

    Meanwhile, in recent months Bloodand Honour bands have held covertgigs in South London, Cardiff and inRochdale and the Mere M shop inCarnaby Street has begun to allowrecords by Blood and Honour bandsand related fanzines like Las tChanceto creep back onto their shelves.

    In the past AFA has organised toremove from the scene public outlets

    r~\()lellf

    ~1':*$~for their filth, like the Cutdown shop inCarnaby Street. Regular pickets andmore direct forms of opposition meantshops like Cutdown and Mere Mceased to openly trade in fascist mate-rial.Blood and Honour may think their

    fortunes are on the rise. But neitherSkrewdriver nor any other Blood andHonour band can play publicly any-where in Britain.

    In May 1989 Blood and Honourtried to hold an "international COl]-cert", the Main Event. Bands fromacross Europe were due to appear,and European Nazis flocked to lon-don to go to the gig. Instead, theNazis were met by hundreds of anti-fascistsat Speakers' Corner, the MainEvent's redirection point. The beating

    agdin andthe stage.

    The Upstarlsweredifferentthough'Theykeptfightil)gback.lan

    StuarlDonOidSon ooceS6idthe .Up~tarts)V;ouldneverplay in london.dgaid;Th~r~ality'islhatit56Iw6ys 'be&h'iiH&BIB8dBi\d'FIBh'Bur'bdnds

    "who eep running fOrcover.

    (y.'he '.' e Iasitiri\~.SkrewddverC6uldpI6y6ig}in!th~. UK?).....Eve.fYSdhi$'lPhBsscimath'3gB,

    supporlers of Blood and Honour re-ceived that day' set them back foryears.

    Donaldson's manoeuvrings acrossEurope and his at tempts to marry hisforces to those of the BNP, all indicatethat its high time to put the boot intothe "B&H boot boys" once again.

    . OB ITUARY .Thr_ members of Violent Storm,who veered to the left while cross-ing the Severn Bridge on the wayto an internotionol tour.Violent Storm were some of the

    Bloodand Honour skinscene'sloy-alists. At least we won't have tolistento their brand of bad heavymetal and Nazi propaganda anylonger. Rest in pieces.

    11

    Ir

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    ?b8Gt~~9Yi6~~trolb6mbsGpthetherUlih1l'dd~~;Th& .

    ...i ;.t~?u~h;.'h?~r$~"Prpudan~.lgud",abbutpr:del " ' i ydUri .Cld~(Cll;.utfightipg~Cl9~!~~ppdS' ......

    ~q1~~~~hi!~h;rf~~~~~;\~!; .I .mlddleclc,$selite/y.tho runftOl1'llhe'

    fasbigtSi~:Si~Bd3fkicki n~ii\t~frteeth~~;Bql'l~J$liKeSkullheoodhd"'NoR~m. e ; t e rd ' b~Y ' r e . , ; . , e rK i i19

    dd~ ~!hbY r'6'6Iciughqh'ihavih:.a say" .1 1 iheYa@Ts5cpps";"ithgU}Jars: qk ihhe&d Tii l' le sC6hwr1tlj' .qp!\uariesf~~.Vioient Storm. (the

    'ilp~cists wh~C:ouldn't drive).e~~pr~!7~d,tr7XYf7r7j~~i a skiQhe6dtXliid;.nofOI:;Uhch6FNazi.

    iih~~ti'\f ....Ii. Withiheypsto~~it:srrll!pH

    .....~imple.r)}\blJn:~~f.w9r~.~rig.il~#~.olists withhopullshittsreat.if lSSand another greaflPiBoyit .. .

    .Nick Storie

    'I

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    12/20

    12

    HATE fASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE FASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE fASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HATE fA SCI SM LOVEMUSI C+ HATE fASC ISM LOVEMUS IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV E MU SIC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV E MU SIC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ H AT E fA SC IS M LO VEMUSIC + HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV EMU S IC+ HATE fASC ISMLOVE MUS IC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E FAS CI SM LOV EMU S IC+ HAT E fA SC ISM LOV E MU SI C+ HAT E FAS C ISM LOV E MU SIC+ HATE

    It's not every day that you see askinhead demo against racism, butthat i s what took place in Lubeck,Germany, at the end of lastyear. Theaimwas to showthe Nazi boneheadsthat neither thestreetsnor theskinhead

    idea belongs to them, and to showthe public that skins are very differentfrom the way they are portrayed inthe papers and on theTV.

    The idea for the demo was thoughtup during a solid skinhead drinkingsessian,and against all the odds themarch was organised in just threeweeks. Therewasnt muchchance fordrummng up support for the event -most of the movement's 'zines hodeither already been printed or wouldcome out after the dote for the demo.Not that this deterred the organisers,whose mottoseemsto havebeen"noth-ing is impossible".

    The headline on the leaflet used topublicise themarch read: "A SkinheadDemonstrationAgainst Racism". Thissummed up the organisers aims. Theywanted a protestagainst racism,whichwould showhow the media's line thatto be a skinhead meansto be a racistis a pi le of crap.

    Thedemo wonted to showthatthereis a difference betweenordinary skinsand the nee-Nazi boneheads. It wason opportunity for skins to meet up,

    THE LUBECK"MARCH OF THE SKINHEADS", 7.12.91

    have a bit of funand to stand up fortheir way of life. .

    On the day, as skins began togather in the centre of Lubeck, theChristmas shoppers who were mllingall around musthave beenwonderingwhich particular for right outfit wasgetting ready to prance through thestreets under the watchful eye of thepolice. The loudspeaker von beltedout Oi classics loud and clear. Leaf-letswere handed out. Byand by skinscome fromall the parts of the country- Frankfurt/Main, Frankfurt/Oder, Ber-lin, Homburg, Holle, Leipzig, Mon-chengladboch, Kiel, Neuss, Rostock,Wolfsburg, Neustadt, Rendsburg,Kappeln, Bremen, Hannover, Lubeckand just about anywhere else youcould mention.

    Given the short notice and the factthat the demo was aimed just atskinheads - there were no "long

    R ig hteous ra ppersDisposable Heroes ofHiphoprisy: Hypocrisy; theGreatest Luxury LP (FourthBroadway Records)

    Disposable Heroes of Hiphop-risy, a multi-racial rap band fromtheSan FransiscoBay Area, defies thestereotypesof US urban blackmusic. Their debut albumoften

    pulsateswth righteous rage but itslyrical concerns ore a for cry fromthe blatant woman-hating of NW Aand Ice T's rantsagainst Korean

    shopkeepers.Front manMichael Franti'swtty

    polemcs recall Gil Scott-Heronin hisprime, while monic percussionist,Ronald Yeo, has borrowed crea-tively from sources such as Latinjazzand industrial noise. The result isabsorbing if rarely easy listening,which slops down a blisteringindictment of American capitalismsways, filtered through the prism ofmassculture.

    Occasionally Franti lapses intopreaching but more often he

    haired" sympathisers on the march -the turn out, though not massive,wasimpressive.After themarch hod passedthrough the streets full of surprisedonlookers, the marchers mode for thelocal unemployed centre, where theirevery need was attended to. Sabrinasupplied the delicious "Oi-Woffels",

    and One-Way-Axel brought along hisroost pototoes and sausages. Therewere music videos, too, though theywere a bit of 0 flop, since you couldsee thembut not hear them

    At around nine o'clock the crowdmovedoff to a gig where two bonds,one from the west, one fromthe east,played: Messer Banzani and NgoboNgobo' Bothbands played their Ska,Reggaeand Rocksteadyfor more thanthree hours in front of an enthusiasticcrowd of skins.Adopted from on article by Bruce Loose inthe German magazine Skintonic 1 #11 )

    provokes reflection and anger -nowhere more so than wth "The

    Winter of the Long Hot Summer", ahaunting account of the real motivesbehind the butchery of the GulfWar. Their revamping of the DeadKennedys' "California Uber Alles"highlights the social forces whichsparked the volcano of South.Central LAwhile "Language ofViolence" decries queer-bashing.

    I'mtoo cynical and long in the

    tooth to proclaim this the mostimportant record of 1992 but it isone which demands a hearing,proving that "political correctness"need not numb the senses.

    G R M cC o ll

    had

    F IGH TING TALK

    I

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    13/20

    The rise of the far right acrossEurope highlights the need for aninternational response to fascism.

    An AFA delegate to a recent anti-fascist conference in Hollandreports on the new links beingestablished between militantanti-fascists

    Over the past few years it hasbecome clear that fascist groups arecooperating with each ather, bothnationally and internationally.

    There is evidence that asophisticated international networkexists which provides mutual supportfor legal and illegal activity. Thisranges from advice and assistancewith organisation and fund-raising,through provision of safe havens forfascists and Nazis on the run, to thesupply of speakers and facilities formeetings and rallies. This networkseems to be getting bigger andstronger all the time.

    Cleorly it is Vitally important thatanti-fascists develop networks at leastas effective as the fascists' Iinks.

    To this end Anti-Fascist Actionaccepted an invitation to attend the

    European anti-racist and anti-fascistconference held in May atEindhoven in Holland. The confer-ence gave AFA the opportunity tostrengthen informal links already inexistence as well as developing newcontacts. We were also involved inarranging separate meetings for themore militant elements over the twodays. It was an extremely successfulweekend which saw the emergenceof a militant European anti-fascistnetwork committed to a radicalstrategy.

    The original conference wasattended by a number o f groups

    from all over Europe. Discussion wascentred around a draft manifestopublished by the Anti..fascist Front ofAntwerp, Belgium, which aimed toset up a European anti-fascistmovement. This manifesto wascomposed of a series of l iberaldemands on the state to criminalisefascists and thus defeat them. This isa completely uselessstrategy whichAFA couldn't consider as a basis forjoint work.

    In conjunction with otherEuropean militants AFA attempted tomove the debate away from thisterrain and towards an acceptance

    AntiFASCISTt 4 i 1 ( 'R I

    Building aninternationalnetwork

    of the need for closs-bosed confron-tation to oppose fascism. Unfortu-nately, due to the political composi-tion of the conference the originalmanifesto was accepted as the basis

    for discussion. The AFA delegatesdecided to abstain from voting onthe manifesto and only participatedin votes around action. We werecriticised by some who interpretedour abstentions as meaning that wehod no views on the subject, ratherthan accepting that we consideredthe document under discussion to bea complete waste of t ime.

    The group founded on thismanifesto is doomed to failure,having refused to adopt a clearworking closs orientation. Weargued strongly that physicalopposition to fascism is not simply

    on option available to anti-fascists,but on inevitable necessity that thefascists will force on us, as andwhen they feel strong enough.

    In stork contrast to the mainconference an "alternative confer-ence" of militants from Britain,France, Belgium, Greece, Sweden,Holland, Norway and Germanywere in brood agreement about thestrategy required to be effectiveagainst the fascist gongs, and haveagreed to keep inclose contact todevelop that understanding.

    just as important as set ting upthis network was the opportunity to

    meel groups from other countrieswho, like AFA, operate at the sharpend of the struggle. like AFA theytoo are criticised by other anti-racistand anti-fascist groups in their home

    countries. The rapport we shared indiscussion with each other helpedbridge any minor language difficul-ties.

    Both Campaign Against Fascismin Europe and the Lesbian and GayCampaign Against Racism andFascism attended the conference,claiming to represent the British anti-fascist movement. We welcome thesupport of the handful of peoplerepresented by these two groups,but the claim that they represent anysignificant forces is simply not true.In any case they undermined theirattempts to occupy the moral high

    ground of British anti-fascism bybargaining and bartering themselvesinto a position of accepting theliberal document as long as theiramendments were also accepted.

    Anti-Fascist Action calls on allmilitant anti-fascists to reject the ideothat we can call on the state tointervene against fascism in favourof the proven strategy of physicaland theoretical education. Wewelcome contact with like-mindedgroups world-wide and haveappointed on International liaisonOfficer to maintain this area ofwork.

    13ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    J ~ = = = = = = = = - - - - = = = - - = I ' ~ L~a~======fr-------~

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    14/20

    14

    The ANL venturesabroad

    We reproduce here a letter sentto the Anti-Nazi League (ANL) byReflex, the French anti-fascist groupin response to a leoRet recentlydistr ibuted by the ANL in France(see apposite) . We also print ourtranslation of the ANL leaRetbelow.The Reflex letter points out that thestruggle against the fascists shouldbe run by those on the ground who

    have the knowledge, ability, andexpert ise to thwart the rise offascism. With LePengainingcredibility and influence at theexpense of the French worki ng classthe last thing that is required is forhis opponents to be diverted byopportunists and adventurers such asthe SWP.

    AFA recognises the value ofworking in co-operation with othergroups both at home and abroadand pursues this despite politicaland tacticol differences between usand the other anti-fascist/anti-racistgroups. In Britain we have consist-

    ently invited the other major forces(Searchlight magazine, the Anti-NaziLeague, the Anti-Racist Alliance) toour public meetings and onto ourevents. Both the ANL and ARAconsistently ignore our invitations.

    In fact the ANL criticises andcondemns AFA's approach to anti-fascism though it has never sug-

    gested a coherent alternativestrategy. AFA pursues a twin trackstrategy of physical and ideologicalconfrontation of fascism from aworking class bose. This strategyhas hod concrete results,and has

    How do we stop Le Pen?

    impeded the growth of fascism here.It is no secret that the ANL is

    run by the SWP, an organisat ionthat right up until the week before itsrelaunch of the ANL denied theexistence of a fascist threat. Cynical

    Once again LePenand his acolyteshave dared to demonstrate on MayDay, the day when we celebrate inter-nationalism and solidarity.

    The fact that they have been ableto march with impunity, without therebeing a coil for a mossconfrontationagainst the fascists, is a disgrace.

    Despite their successesin March'sregional and local elections, Le Penand his supporters con be stopped.

    In Britain, the Anti-Nazi League(ANL),which has just been relaunched,struggled against the Nazis with greatsuccess at the end of the seventies.Through a campaign aimed at unmask-ing the Nazis and through massphysi-

    cal confrontat ions, we ensured their

    ANTI NAZI lEAG UEdefeat, a defeat from which they havetaken more than ten years to recover.

    Inspired by LePen'sexample, theyhoped to take advantage of the re-centgeneral election in Britain to stagea comeback. Thanks to the efforts ofthe ANL, they got a derisory score.While in the 1970s they polled100,000 votes in Londonand 30,000in Leicester, their average vote thistime was just 455.

    The ANL's victory was made pos-sible by bringing about the widest pos-sible unity of all those opposed to the

    foscists, by distributing millions of leaf-lets tearing away their respectablemask and by confronting them physi-cally in force of numbers whereverthey showed themselves.

    Today the ANL has groups inevery important town in Britain. Thegroups bring together young people,not so young people, whites, blocks,Jews, Muslims, Christians ... in short,all those who want to struggle togetherin order to smash the Nazis ond en-sure that there will never again beroom for their ideas in our country.

    We crushed the fascists in the1970s and we will do it again in the1990s. In France as in Britain, thisvictory ispossible, but itwill only comeabout through a combination of politi-cal campaigns and mossphysical con-

    frontations. Nothing elsewill stop them.

    F

    I

    F IG HT IN G TA iK

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    15/20

    INTERNATIONAL

    To the Executive Committee of theAnti Nazi League

    We are writing to you from Reflex,the French anti-fascist group based inParis, because we attended the an-nual 1 M.ay demonstrat ion in Parisand were shocked ta see your organi-satian there distributing thousands ofleaflets oontaining advice on how tobeat the Frenchfascists, and giving aBritish address as a contact for ananti-fascist compcign.

    We do not need or want yourorganisation coming to our oountry topatronise the French anti-fascist move-ment and tell us how ta conduct ourstruggles. We note that the ANL didnot, as a oourtesy, bother to contactus or other groups engaged in thestruggle in order to discuss how youmight possibly suppart our work andto discover the true situation in France.

    Our group has been working forsix years, with a defined and testedstrategy, to combat French fascism.Other groups here have also beenestablished for long periods of time towork as port of a united anti-fascistfront. We find it insulting that youthink you can send your lackeys over

    REFLEX

    here to launch a oompaign against LePen without making any attempt tooonsult French anti-fascist groups. It isnot the first time that British anti-fascistgroups have attempted to undermineour work here, but we sincerely hopeit will be the last.

    We fully know the reputation andrecord of the Anti-Nazi League in Brit-ain, and we are not impressed with it.We know that groups we have linkswith and trust, such as AFA and

    Searchlight, do not have a high opin-ion of you and find you difficult towork with. We have to ask ourselveswhy it is that the ANL thinks it canbuild a oompoign in a foreign countrywhen it can' t even build a successfulcampaign in its own country.

    Your leaflet "How do we stop LePen?" contained several inaccuraciesabout the ANL record in England,notably your claim to have decreasedthe fascist vote in Britain in the Aprilgeneral election, which is a blatantdistortion of the truth. We also note inthe last paragraph your claim thatsuccessfulcampaigns against fascism

    Ant iFASCISTm I ![ 't l

    must contain a combination of politi-cal campaigns and mass physicaloonfrontat ion. While this is true, wehave not seen the ANL oorry this outsuccessfully in Britain since 1978.Since that t ime the major successfulanti-fascist work in the UK has beenachieved by AFA and Searchlight andnot by yourselves. For the record,groups in France such as Reflex andSCALPhave had the twin tactics policyfor at least eight years, so we do notappreciate being told how to do whatwe are already doing.

    We hope that we will not have to

    write to you again about this - youare not welcome here except in asupport capacity where your organi-sation respects the lead of our organi-sations. We appreciate the support offoreign groups for our campaign herebut the French anti-fascist movement isnot prepared to have its work under-mined and destroyed by thoughtlesspatronising attempts of the ANL to takeon our struggle without even beingpolite enough to oontact the groupsalready working here.

    Yours in struggleReflex14 Ruede Nateuil, 75015 Paris

    readers well question the SWP'smotives in regenerating the ANL.However, the blatant sectarianismand dishonesty with which the ANLleadership has conducted itself hasbrought criticism from all quarters.

    It prefers jockeying over"prime" positions on marches andchanting radical-sounding slogans toa principled opposition to fascism.Not for them on attempt to workwith others who have some practicalexperience in confronting the fascist

    street presence. A high mediaprofile is far more important. Now,with some six months experience offai lure under its belt , the ANL feels i tis ready to launch a take-over bidfor the anti-fascist movement inEurope.

    We fully endorse the call byReflex, which demands that the ANLconsult with thase at the sharp endof the fight, rather than simplyindulge themselves in a Europeantour of guest interventions desiqnedto attract media attention, often tothe detriment of the real anti-fasciststruggle.

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    ARA ' s strategyfor failureA t a fringe meeting at this year'sannual conference of the civil servants'union, CPSA, an ARA spokespersonsummed up their perspectives. He ar-gued: "It is not enough to call for blackand white to unite (against racism andfascism]. They mustdo so under blacklecdership."Anti-Fascist Action profoundly disa-

    grees with this statement. In contrast toARA, we standfor a militantclassbasedanti-fascist organisation, which makesno distinction between race, creed, andcolour, and which fightsthe fascistthreatboth ideologically and physically. Ourrole mustbe to organise al l sectionsoftheworking class,not oneparticular partof i t.Thereis a danger that ARA's position

    will force black and white aport ratherthan bring themtogether. How canARAexpect people to playa full port againstracismand fascism if memberswho are

    white, Jewish, Irish etc, are excludedfrom a full role in the organisation? Thisis o recipe for disaster for two reasons.Firstly,goOCmilitantanti-racistsand anti-fascistswill be neglected and secondly,the ability to build a massorganisationwill be curtailed if non-white activistsrightly refuse to accept second-classmem-bership status.A second position flowing from this

    approach was that "only the victims ofracismand fascismcan define the strug-gle". Ina sensethis istrue, but not in theway thatARAmeanit. leaving aside thepatronising language, the "victims" ofracism and fascism here clearly meansthe people who are the target of racistattacks.Of course, black self-defenceis a big

    port of theanti-fasciststruggle, but to seeracism and fascism as essentially thesomething is to fundamentally misunder-

    Continued over

    15

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    16/20

    16

    s tand the rea l nature of the fasc ist th reat .Fascism does not only pose a threat to

    block, Irish or Jewish people. Fascistgroups by no means only attack non-whites. Their real aim behind all theiractivities is to divide, weaken and de-stroy the organised and progressive work-ing class movement. Racism is a tacticthey use to this end -and in Britain todayit is on extremely important one. But, aswe have argued repea tedly, i t i s not thei ronly tactic. Unless the problem of fas-c ism isseen in class te rms and dea lt withon a class basis, then we are playinginto the hands of our enemies.

    All sections of the warki ng class are

    potential victims of fascism. All of us,black or white, have a vested interest infigh ting racism and fascism.

    The speaker at the CPSA fringe meet-ing claimed that the real significance ofARA was that, "for the first time - underthe banner of ARA - the labour move-ment and black organisa tions had jo inedtogether under black leadership ... with27 unions having a lready aff il ia ted" .

    Quite impressive? Well, not really. Itmay well be true that 27 unions withhundreds of thousands of members haveaff il ia ted. Maybe some labour MPs havealso come out in favour of ARA.

    But unless official backing is accom-panied by real class this is nothing but a

    token gesture. There are no more peopleon the streets, demos are no bigger, notone ext ra leaflet i s handed out . It doesn'tresult in less British National Pqrty orNationa l Front paper sa les or activi ty ; orfewer racist at tacks . Itdoes not curtail theability of these people to organise and it

    does not result in one new member foryour own organisation. The activity in-dulged in by ARA is tokenism and pre-tence. Tokenism for trades unions andlabour MPs who can ease their con-sc iences by affi li at ing, and pre tence forARA when they th ink that thi s represen tsa mass movement.

    But what about the second port of theequation - black organisation. This isagain more form than substance. Or-ganisations, such as the Society Of Blacklawyers and the National Black Caucusoften have a very l imi ted bose of suppor twith in the loca l b lack communi ties . The irmembersh ip is smal l, sel f- se lected and

    generally composed of middle classcareerists. The whole policy of paperaffiliations and paper organisations isfooling nobody except, perhaps, them-selves.

    ARA attempts to make anti-racist/ anti-fasci st st ruggle a mora l question , goodversus bad. This is the path todefea t. Themiddle class and careerist elements ofthese organisations will saon desert, andthe only agency who could deal with theproblem - the working class - are eitherignored or are seen as inherently racistand lef t to be the right's recruiting ground.Unless ARA addresses its politics to thewhite working class as well as rallyingthe immediate victims of racist attacks

    ARA will ignore the majority of the work-ing c lass in Bri ta in today. This wil l a lloworganisa tions such as the BNP a free runand grant them an opportunity they willgrasp with both hands.

    Cri ti ci sm of ARA would have less forceand per tinence if , in thei r pol iti ca l activ-

    ity, they could show some concrete suc-cess. The sad fact is that ARA has madeno tangible difference inthe bottle againstraci sm and fasc ism. The few targets i t setitself have been a resounding failure.They set out to close the BNP books hopin Welling, Kent and to change the bel-once of forces in the area. After onedemons tration and 14 picke ts of the Torylocal council the bookshop is still openand looks as if it will remain so. Downthe road at Thamesmead, the scene ofRolon Adams' racist killing, the only pubon the estate The Wildfowler still doesnot serve black people.

    In North Kensington a working men's

    club operates a colour bar. ARA called ademonstration, no work to build for thedemonstration was done, no posters, noleallets, no attempt to contact other likeminded people. What happened? Forty-six people turned up to find themselvesoutnumbered by PC Plod. The managerof this particular club must have beenquaking in his boots when the intrepid46 marched around the corner. Thesesort of events only serve to demoraliseyour own support and give heart to youropponents.

    But then ARA and the people wholead i ta re no strangers to thi s kind 01sel f-defeat ing, impoten t exerc ise . They havepursued these tact ics on a bigger scale-

    with worse results - elsewhere (see ourrepor t on the Bermondsey march in FT2).Their approach cannot defeat the fas-c ist s, cannot s trengthen the ant i- fasci stmovement, and cannot provide the bosisfor a progress ive working c lass a lterna-t ive to grow.

    The Revo lu tiona ry In te rna tiona lis t LeagueThe following statement was pre-pared to explain the decision to expel adisruptive group from AFA last year. How-ever, at the time no-one approached usfor such an explanation.

    In the interests of non-sectarianismAFA branches subsequently allowed mem-bers of the Rll to re-join on an individualbasis. This turned out to be a mistake.Afte r a per iod of intermi tten t a ttendanceat branch meetings and non-ottendance atAFA ocfivifies they attempted to disruptour national conference with the sameagenda as they had prior to their expul-sion, though they received no support atthe meefing . They then a ttempted to con-tinue their programme of disruption withinthe AFA branches by re-entering as agroup.

    In addition the Rll produced a leaf-let , containing a diatribe condemning AFAboth as a group and as individual mem-bers, which was given out on a demon-stration called by the Drummond StreetYouth Association in london on Sunday

    17 May. We cannot ignore their csser-tions that AFA isa racist organisation madeup of racist individuals, prone to senselessviolence. Thesebaselessaccusations clearlyindicate the dishonesty of their claim towant to build AFA.

    Their actions have been energeticallyand unambiguously opposed and two Rllmembers have been expel led from AFA.For this reason we have decided to pub-lish our original statement below.

    The expulsion of the RIL

    The activities of the Revolutionary Inter-nationalist league (Rill within Anti-FascistAction led to their expulsion in October1991. This action was taken as a lostresort in order to enable AFA to cont inueeffective anti-fascist work.

    On their own admission the RIL d onot share the orientation that AFA havetaken in the fight against fascism. Werecognise that fascism is inherent in capi-talist society, but have no illusions that

    AFA is the vehicle to topple the state.Rother it is our purpose to create the cli-mate whereby progressive lef t and anar-chist groups can bring their ideas andprograms to those targe ted by the fasc istgangs both as victims of their abuse andas v ic tims of the ir recru itment .

    The Rll insist that AFA must have a

    complete political program before it cancombat fascism. Clearly, an organisationconsisting of such a wide range of politi-cal groups and individuals cannot developsuch a program. Indeed if AFA were todo so then it would no longer be a broodbased campaign but a political party it-self. It is apparent that the Rll wanted tosubstitute AFA for a political peirty andthat the resul t would mirror the pol it ics ofthe Ril. Here lies there true motive - thecynical manipulation of a principled andeffec tive group in order to bui ld the ir ownparty.

    Anti-Fascist Action will not be de-Rected from the primary task of confront-ing the fascists and race attackers by ei-ther the fasc ist gangs , the sto te , or incon-sequential manipula tive groups and indi-viduals.

    F IGH TING TALK

    - ' 1

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    17/20

    Being tortured is many people'sworst nightmare. Imagine you are

    ane of the hundreds af thousands

    thraugh the warld for whom this

    nightmare is real ity. Or think what

    would happen to yau if your town

    was destroyed by war, your fam ly

    subject to arbitrary arres t or execu-

    tion. What wauld you do?

    If you tried ta find a safer place

    ta live yau would become one of the

    world's twenty mllion refugees.

    These are the people who hove

    become the la test target of Tory

    racism and the gutter press.

    The Tory Asylum Bill, introduced

    late last year, was designed to

    make sur e that any refugee who

    tries to flee to Britain w ll have to

    f ace a new nightmare of paverty,

    detention and, for the vast majority,

    swft deportation back to the hell-

    holes they have escoped from.

    Now, w th John Major firmy

    reinstalled in Downing Street, the

    racist Asylum Bill is back an the

    agenda. The April general election

    had forced the government toabandon the bill . It is once moreunder government review, wth the

    results expected some time around

    September.

    It's anyone's guess what

    " impravements" to the bil l the Tories

    wll try ta get away wth in their

    fourth consecutive term. Its relaunch

    wll almast certainly be surrounded

    by a media-fog of scoremangering,

    lies and blatant racism, just as it

    was first time around.

    Under the old bill asylum

    seekers who arrived in Britain via a

    " sof e" third country would have

    AntiFA S C I S TM i ,t 't l

    With the Tories back in power state racism is firmlyback on the agenda. The Asylum Bill is beingrevamped ready for the autumn. Sam Lowry looksat what it proposes

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    PART OF THE TORRENT OF RACISM FROM THE TORY PRESS AT THE TIMETHE ASYLUM BIU WAS FIRST PROPOSED

    17

    been deported back to i t, i rrespec-

    tive of the treatment they mght

    receive there. All asylum seekers

    would be finger-printed - treatment

    reserved for crimnals in Britain.

    They would have no right to local

    authority housing and would

    probobly be unable to claim any

    benefits for weeks or months due to

    Home Office requirements concern-ing proof of identi ty.

    An asylum seeker would have

    only 48 hours to appeal ogainst a

    deportation order and some would

    have no right of appeal at all. The

    right to legal aid for asylum seekers

    would also be abolished. If you

    arrived wth no documents, did not

    apply immediately for asylum, did

    not try to move to 0 "safe" port of

    your own country, refused to be

    fingerprinted or even just attempted

    to speak out in Britain against your

    country' s regime you could then be

    deported straight away!

    Many would-be osylum seekers

    w ll never get as f ar as Immgration

    Control. European countr ies such as

    France, Germany, Belgium and Ita ly

    now fine airlines around 1,000 for

    carrying passengers wthout correct

    documents. Britain has just increased

    its fine to 2,000.

    To justi fy this move the Tories

    tried to whip up scare stories about

    "bogus refugees" who are reolly

    "economc migrants". Bernard

    Ingham, Margaret Thatcher 's old

    press secretary declared:

    "Britain - and to a degree

    Westmnster, as the traditional home

    of the lost dogs of this world -

    cannot continue to allow itself to be

    exploi ted in this way"

    Tory MP, David Evans splut-

    tered:

    "Why should this country be the

    world's dumping ground for asylum

    seekers?"

    The reality for those seeking a

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    18/20

    18

    RACISM

    hoven from persecution and repres-sian is very different .

    Br itain receives the smal les tnumber of asylum seekers of all themajor European countries - approxi-mately 200 per week and the Toriesare forcing down the numberswithout any new legislation. Inaddition, most white Europeanrefugees get admmitance without toomany problems, while only a tinyminor ity of non-Europeans qual ify.

    The plai n fact is that the Toriessimply decided to ploy the racecord, portly to tighten up theborders of "Fortr ess Europe" andportly as a vote-winning exercise

    aki n to Thatcher's 1978 attempts tounder cut the Notional Front votebefore the 1979 election. At thattime she remarked:

    "The British character has donemuch for democracy, for low, anddone so much throughout the worldthat if there is any fear that it mightbe swamped, people are going toreact and be rather hostile to thosecoming in."

    Despite the pitifully inept lies ofthe BNP and NF, the 1971 Immigra-tion Act coupled with variousamendments to immigration rules inthe late-1970s ensur ed that primaryimmigration into Britain was effec-

    'REVIEWThe people who spoke las t night for

    a group called Anti-Fascist Acfion, aston-ishingly, were allowed to put tne case forphysically opposing tneir right wing oppo-nents, and to boast of tne street battlestney have already fought.

    Their main spokesman, a bur ly ru]-fian witn a tnick Geordie accent, a leotherjacket and a woolly hat of tne type wornby football supporters, sneered at good,old-Ioshioned l iberals and trendy lefties"who would be uneasy about his messageof violence, and who might argue thottnere were olher ways to oppose fascis t

    groups. "We're not ei tner/or", he said,'we're for bolh" ,There could be marches and events

    and exhibitions against fascism, but "ifyou're not pre pored to meet force witnpolitical force" - and the weaselly word"polificol" had clear ly been inserted hereagainst the general tenor of tne argument- "then you must retir e from the politicaloreno" I he said.

    Various supporters of Anti -FascistAction were shown in silhouette as theytalked witn relish of the violent confronta-t ions witn Br it ish Nat ional Par ty support-ers, and of the alleged links between tneBNP and protestan t Orange elements inScotlond. More openly, an Ant i-FascistAction sympothiser, former boxer TerryMarsh, t ried to explain the attraction of

    fascism for whi te youths , and an old coup ie remembered tne ac tivi ties in the Eas tEnd of Sir Oswald Moseley - only forwool lyhot to asser t tnat Jews there in the1930s had not been so badly a ttacked asAsians today.

    But tne overall message of the pro-gramme was that to evade confrontationwith fascism was "object polit ical coword-ice". In present ing a not ional plat form toa group which looks suspiciously l ike lef twing fascists eager for a street war withright wing fascists, tne BSC was plainlynot serving the interests of democracy.

    How can it now witn equity resistany demand by tne BNP for the right toreply?

    Peter PatersonDaily Mail 19.5.92

    tivel y stopped completely. That onlyleft refugee status as a way ofgetting into the country. For manyrefugees escape from their homecountry is often a matter of life ordeath. But for the Tories this is acomplete i rrelevance. The "lostdogs", li ving in countries exploitedand devastated for years by Britianand other imperialist powers, willhave to fend for themselves and diein the process jf they can find noother hoven.

    Meanwhile every year billionsof pounds are transferred from the

    economies of the third world to thebanks of London, Tokyo and NewYork. This vastly outweighs the pitifulsums donated in the form of aid tocountries suffering from poverty andeconomic collapse as a result ofwestern exploitation.

    Economic migration is welcomewhen it is the migration of profitsfrom one part of the globe toanother. The "free market" is whatthe Thatcher years were all about.And if you are a profit maker with150,000 or more in the bank andplan to employ two or more peopleyou can buy your way into Britain,

    no problem.That is the other side of the

    coin. The only people with aninterest in seeing a new Asylum Billenforced are the bosses. Their divideand rule tactics are designed tokeep us all in our places. Worse,the racism of the state and its tome

    media help to lend credibility to thef il thy l ies of the likes of the BNP andNF.

    But the numbers are i rrelevant .Citing the figur es exposes the Tories'hypocrisy but it must not lead to theconclusion that fewer is better. Thisis the logic of the Asylum Bill with its

    built in endorsement of all theexis ting rac is t immigrat ion legisla-tion.

    The argument that increasedimmigration or settlement by refu-gees would lead to more racism insociety is ut ter rubbish. Perpetuot inqthe myth of the "bogus refugee" willbreed more, not less racism,creating a climate in which racism isincreasingly respectabl e. And thefascists will toke full advantage ofthis. We have to begin organisingright now to smash the new AsylumBill off the Tories' agenda for thei rnew term. There is no time to lose.

    AFAonthe boxIn May BBC2's Open Space ran adocumentary with a di fference . Insteadof the usual liberal treatment of theques tion of fascism and rac ism, a wholehalf hour was given over to AFA. Theprogramme, Fighting Talk [I! - Ed],was an incisive exposure of the fas-cists' activities and a militant call fordirect action, including physical con-frontati on, to stop them.

    This clearly got right up the noseof some worthy figures viewing it. Weprint here Peter Paterson's outragedsplut ter ings in the Daily Mail- the pa-per that said "Hurrah for theBlackshirts!" in the thirties.

    Incidentally, Paterson claims weequivocated about political force. Thisis a lie. The narrator said "physicalforce" loud and clear.

    Interested in seeing our video nasty?Contact the box number.

    A most serious error of judgment ap-pears to have been made las t night by tneSSC, in offer ing air time to a group whichquite unashamedly advocates the use ofpolitical violence.

    The Open Space slot, allowinggroups or individuals access to television,together with the facilities to make tneirown programme, normally conforms to tneunderstanding which mot ivates a l iberalsociety l ike our own: tnat everyone is ent i-ri ed to express the ir v iews or opinions,provided that they do not seek to imposetnei r aims by vio lent or i llegal means .

    F IG HT IN G TALK

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    19/20

    L E T T E R S

    S upport AFA prisonersDear Fighting Talk,

    I am now coming close toserving two years of a four yearsentence for activities involvingan attack upon a leading organ-iser of fascist groups. I have'found the time has gone quicklydue totally to the fact that I havehad tremendous support from theAfA welfare fund.

    It has always been easy tosupport people at the beginningof their sentence and then forgetabout them. But I have receivednothing but lOOper cent supportfrom the welfare fund.

    Recently there has been ahigh l'ate of arrests amongst anti-fascists and these people haveto be supported financially if theyare fined. Also if they are unfor-tunate enough to be given a jailsentence they have to b~ giventhe moral and political supportof . letters and the financ;iai sup-port of donations to the welfarefund.

    Tony, AFA prisoner

    Donations: send chequesmade payable toAfA Welfare Fund

    Soft on the ANL?Dear F ig ht in g Tal k,

    The article in the last issue on theANL "Then and Now" rightly pointedto the problems with the politics of the"relaunched" (and soon to be re-

    wound up by the looks of things) Anti-Nazi League (ANL). But I think thearticle painted too rosy a picture ofthe ANl in the 1970s.

    The ANl Mark 1 did a lot ofwork in mobilising against the fascists,in particular in gett ing working classyouth involved in the struggle. Only adyed-in-the-wool sectarian would sayotherwise. But that struggle wasn't al-ways of the militant variety AFA standsfor.

    Sure, the ANl in some areas cre-ated "squads" to take an the fascistson the streets. But that wasn't the gen-eral picture. After the Battle of Lewi-

    sham the SWP were often the keenestto direct people away from militantconfrontation

    The ANl's "brood" nature - in-cluding celebrities, respectable politi-cians who would run a mile from vio-lent confrontation, and 'the odd churchleader or lord - gave the SWP theexcuseto downplay confrontation veryearly on.

    The fascists marched unopposedin Haxton the day after theANl's firstbig carnival in london. Worse, whenthe fascists marched on Brick Laneonthe same day as the second big lon-don carnival in September 1978, the

    ISSUE3 - Sum mer 1992

    SWP refused to mobiliseagainst them.They took thousands of people awayfrom the fascistsand sent about twentyover to help the h~ndful 6f anti-fascistswho did try to confront the NF.

    I was at Brick Lane that day andI was sickened by the idea that wewere outnumbered by the fascists atthe very same time as thousands ofanti-fascists were at a carnival on theother side of london.

    This was a betrayal of militantanti-fascism and it happened in the"healthy" period of the ANL accord-ing to your article. And this is not theonly example. InSheffield, at the sametime, the ANL condemned me andothers in the Sheffield Anti-FascistCorn-mittee, because we took militant ac-tion agai nst fascist paper sellers in thearea. They said then what they are

    saying now - our action was "squod-dist".

    None of this is to downplay thepositive role that militant anti-fascistswithin the ANl did play on countlessoccasions in the 1970s. But often thisrole was played despite the plans ofthe ANL's SWP leaders rather thanbecause of them. And we shauldn'tforget that as well as the ANl thebattles against the fascistsin the 1970swere also fought by militants in nu-merous local anti-fascist and anti-roc-ist committees outside the ANl.

    Yours in struggleArthur Merton, South london

    AntiFA S C I S Tr 4 ,m~J t l .

    If your group.Jsriot list~below and~ou:V;c:.u_ld"like

    to get involved in th enational Anti-FascistAction

    network or be kept in touch

    with other groups through-

    out the country please

    contact London AFA as soon

    as possible.

    LondonAFA Herts AFABM 1734, london PO Box 245,WC1N 3XX StAlbans,

    Birmingham AFA Hertfordshire

    POBox 2414, Kent AFAHandsworth, PO Box 88, Rochester,BirminghamB21 OTZ KentMEl lAU

    BrightonAFA LeedsAFAc/o Brighton Box 151, 52 Call lane,UnemployedCentre, leeds lS2 6DT6 TilburyPlace,

    LeicesterAFARBrighton,Sussexc/o leicesterTC,

    Bristol AFA SecularHall,c/o london AFA HumberstoneGate,

    Cardiff AFAleicester

    POBox 368, Cardiff, Uverpool AFAWales CF2 1SO PO Box 110,

    Chesterfield ANL liverpool l69 8DP

    POBox 178, Manchester AFA.Chesterfield POBox 83, South

    Cleveland AFAWest PDO,

    Box 13, c/o StMary's ManchesterM 15 5NJ

    Centre, Corporotion Norwich AFARood,Middlesborough, POBox 73,Cleveland Norwich NR1 2EBDerby CARF St Albans AFAPOBox 70, c/o HertsAFADerby DEI 9JW

    EdinburghAFATyne and Wear'

    c/o Glasgow AFA Anti-FascistAssociation

    Exeter AFA c/o 4 TheClothc/o TheFlying Past, Market, Newcasrie-PO Box 185, upon-T ne NEIlEAExeterEX44EW

    Yark AFAGlasgow AFA c/o York UniversityPOBox 266, Glasgow, StudentsUnion,ScoriandG1 5RX Goodrich College, York

    19

  • 8/3/2019 Fighting Talk - 03

    20/20

    9

    Merchandise

    Ant iFASCISTAll cheques/postal orders poyable to Anti-Fascist Acfion, please include a contribu-tion towards post and pocking_

    StickersAFA StickersCable Street Beat stickers

    UNITYCARNIVAL

    '92Last year AFA organised a 10,000strong anti-fascist carnival on Hack-ney Downs in East London. Thisyear we 'l l be repeating the exer-cise, but on a larger scale. Bondsalready booked to appear includeNew Model Army, 25th of Mayand Capitol Radio DJ Tim West-wood. The Unity' Carnival is a freefestival, and to pull it off we need

    your support.Make sure your trade union

    branch, polit ical party', solidarity' or-ganisotion or community' group ison the list of sponsors this year. Theminimum donat ion for sponsoringorganisations is just 50 - but feelfree to give as much as you like.

    If you'd like an AFA speakerto talk about the carnival, or wouldlike to send in a donation to spon-sor