5
FIG Working Week 2007 Fitness Analysis of Height Variation for GPS Monitoring Site C-C Chang* C Chang* , P , P-S Hung** and H S Hung** and H-Z Chen*** Z Chen*** * Department of Information Management, Yu * Department of Information Management, Yu-Da University, Taiwan Da University, Taiwan ** Department of Land Management, Feng ** Department of Land Management, Feng-Chia University, Taiwan Chia University, Taiwan ***Land Survey Bureau, Taiwan ***Land Survey Bureau, Taiwan Hong Kong 13-17 May 2007 Motivations Accompanied with heavy withdrawal of under- ground water in the coastal regions Subsidence area is enlarged towards inland and potentially damages the engineering structure of the Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR) A long-term subsidence occurred in the middle- south of Taiwan Taipei Taichung Yunlin Kaohsiung Background Study Area Track Bridge Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR) Significant Subsidence Area THSR Yunlin County Monitoring by Spirit Leveling Land Subsidence at Yunlin (1994-1995) WR02 WR03 WR04 WR05 WR06 WR07 WR08 WR09 WR10 WR01 WR11 WR1 2 WR13 WR14 WR15 WR16 WR17 WR18 WR19 WR20 WR21 WR22 WR23 WR24 WR25 WR26 WR27 WR28 WR29 WR30 WR31 WR32 WR33 WR34 WR35 WR36 WR37 WR39 WR38 WR40 WR41 WR42 WR43 WR44 WR45 WR46 WR47 WR48 WR49 WR50 WR51 WR52 N GPS Set-up for Monitoring

FIG Working Week 2007 Motivations · ** Department of Land Management, Feng -Chia University, Taiwan ***Land Survey Bureau, Taiwan Hong Kong 13-17 May 2007 Motivations Accompanied

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 1

    FIG Working Week 2007

    Fitness Analysis of Height Variation for GPS Monitoring Site

    CC--C Chang*C Chang*, P, P--S Hung** and HS Hung** and H--Z Chen***Z Chen***

    * Department of Information Management, Yu* Department of Information Management, Yu--Da University, TaiwanDa University, Taiwan** Department of Land Management, Feng** Department of Land Management, Feng--Chia University, TaiwanChia University, Taiwan***Land Survey Bureau, Taiwan***Land Survey Bureau, Taiwan

    Hong Kong 13-17 May 2007

    Motivations

    Accompanied with heavy withdrawal of under-ground water in the coastal regions

    Subsidence area is enlarged towards inland andpotentially damages the engineering structure ofthe Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR)

    A long-term subsidence occurred in the middle-south of Taiwan

    Taipei

    Taichung

    Yunlin

    Kaohsiung

    Background

    Study Area

    Track Bridge

    Taiwan High Speed Rail (THSR)Significant Subsidence Area

    THSR

    Yunlin County

    Monitoring by Spirit Leveling

    Land Subsidence at Yunlin(1994-1995)

    WR02WR03

    WR04

    WR05WR06

    WR07

    WR08

    WR09

    WR10

    WR01

    WR11WR1

    2

    WR13

    WR14

    WR15

    WR16

    WR17

    WR18WR19

    WR20

    WR21

    WR22

    WR23

    WR24

    WR25

    WR26

    WR27

    WR28

    WR29

    WR30WR31

    WR32

    WR33

    WR34

    WR35

    WR36

    WR37WR39

    WR38

    WR40

    WR41

    WR42

    WR43

    WR44

    WR45

    WR46

    WR47

    WR48

    WR49

    WR50

    WR51

    WR52

    N

    ����������

    GPS�������

    GPS Set-up for Monitoring

  • 2

    Subsidence Rate (1998)

    120.00 120.10 120.20 120.30 120.40 120.50 120.60 120.70

    23.50

    23.60

    23.70

    23.80

    4.005.006.007.008.009.0010.0011.0012.0013.0014.0015.0016.0017.0018.0019.0020.0021.0022.0023.00

    Subsidence (Jan-Nov 2000)

    WR02WR03

    WR04

    WR05WR06

    WR07

    WR08

    WR09

    WR10

    WR01

    WR11WR1

    2

    WR13

    WR14

    WR15

    WR16

    WR17

    WR18WR19

    WR20

    WR21

    WR22

    WR23

    WR24

    WR25

    WR26

    WR27

    WR28

    WR29

    WR30WR31

    WR32

    WR33

    WR34

    WR35

    WR36

    WR37WR39

    WR38

    WR40

    WR41

    WR42

    WR43

    WR44

    WR45

    WR46

    WR47

    WR48

    WR49

    WR50

    WR51

    WR52

    N

    ����������

    GPS�������

    Control Stations of TWD97

    M002

    Height Variations at M002

    1997 2000 2002

    WR02WR03

    WR04

    WR05WR06

    WR07

    WR08

    WR09

    WR10

    WR01

    WR11WR1

    2

    WR13

    WR14

    WR15

    WR16

    WR17

    WR18WR19

    WR20

    WR21

    WR22

    WR23

    WR24

    WR25

    WR26

    WR27

    WR28

    WR29

    WR30WR31

    WR32

    WR33

    WR34

    WR35

    WR36

    WR37WR39

    WR38

    WR40

    WR41

    WR42

    WR43

    WR44

    WR45

    WR46

    WR47

    WR48

    WR49

    WR50

    WR51

    WR52

    N

    ����������

    GPS�������

    GPS Tracking Station

    PKGM

    THSRHeight (m)

    42.400

    42.500

    42.600

    42.700

    42.800

    42.900

    43.000

    43.100

    43.200

    43.300

    1 33 65 97 129

    161

    193

    225

    257

    289

    321

    353

    385

    417

    449

    481

    hei ght

    week

    Weekly GPS Solutions at PKGM(1995-2004)

    Vh= -3 cm/year

    1999 Mw=7.6 Earthquake

  • 3

    Correlated to Seasonal Descending ?

    Weekly GPS Heighting in 1997 Seasonal Subsidence Rates

    - 3.1All-Span

    (1995-2001)

    - 9.0- 1.5Average- 9.8- 4.12001- 4.42.42000-12.2- 3.61999- 9.51.41998- 4.41.31997- 8.8- 1.41996-13.8- 6.61995

    WinterSummerAnnual Rate (cm/year)Year

    Objectives of this Study

    Estimating the up-coming level of subsidence to further prevent any possible damage

    Testing the fitness of the estimation modelswith a continuous GPS data set

    Establishing a forecast technique by using a relatively short term of GPS monitoring data

    Artificial Neural Network

    Imitating the pattern of human thought and inducing an operation rule through learning process to build up its recognition and fore-cast capability

    input layer hidden layer output layer

    X1 (t) ��� Y1

    X�(t) ��� Y2

    Xn(t) ��� Yn

    ANN Transfer Function

    It transfers a set of input/output samples into a non-linear optimisation process by finding rules from massive data

    1

    ( )n

    j ij i ji

    Y f W X θ=

    = −∑

    Wij is the weight connecting layer node i and jθj is the threshold of node j

    Three-layer BP network’s training process is composed of a forward and back propagation

    Grey Forecast Theory A common GM(1,1) model is approximate to a differential model

    Modelling with very less data to estimate the variables for system’s future behavior

    (1) (0)

    (0) (1) (1)

    ,

    ˆ ( 1) (1)

    ˆ ˆ( ) ( 1) ( )

    ak

    dx ax bdt

    b bx k x ea a

    x k x k x k

    + =

    + = − + = + −%

    (1) (0)

    1

    (1) (1) (1)

    (1) (0) (0) (1) (1) 2

    1 1 1 1

    2 2

    ( ) ( )

    ( ) 0.5 ( ) 0.5 ( 1)

    ( ), ( ), ( )* ( ), [ ( )]

    * 4* * *,

    4* 4*

    k

    m

    k k k k

    m m m m

    x k x m

    z k x k x k

    C z m D x m E x m x m F z m

    C D E D F C Ea b

    F C F C

    =

    = = = =

    =

    = + −

    = = = =

    − −= =

    − −

    ∑ ∑ ∑ ∑

  • 4

    Regression Analysis

    Variable hi can be predicted using independentvariables of ti

    hi=ati+b

    a, b coefficients represent the slope and interceptti is defined as time variable hi is the height measurement

    Data Sets & Test Models

    Long Term DataNeural Network

    Short Term DataRegression Analysis

    Grey Theory

    Regression Analysis(Pre 50-52 weekly solutions)

    (Pre 5 weekly solutions)

    ANN Sample Data

    ANN Samples & Hidden Layers

    ANN Hidden Layers

    • Using Alyuda Neuro Intelligence Version 2.1 software• Training, testing and verifying samples are randomly made• Optimum hidden layers are automatically determined

    ANN Training Algorithm & Testing Network

    Default option of quick propagation algorithm is appliedwith the coefficient of 1.75 and learning rate of 0.1

    Height Estimations & Errors

    Estimation Models

    Short Term DataLong Term Data(Pre 52 weekly solutions)

    (ANN / RA)

    Estimation Models(RA / GFT)

    Height Estimates(for next epoch)

    Height Estimates(for next epoch)

    Average RMS Errors(check with measured heights

    for one year)

    (Pre 5 weekly solutions)

    ….….

    …. 0.90.5Standard Deviation

    1.41.1Average

    1.81.32004

    1.70.82003

    3.72.22002

    0.80.72001

    1.21.12000

    0.80.71999

    1.01.21998

    0.81.51997

    1.00.81996

    RA model (cm)ANN model (cm)Year of Data

    Height estimation error based on long-term data

    Fitness Analysis

  • 5

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

    Year

    RMS(cm)

    ANN

    RA

    ANN model provided a better performance of 27% than that of using RA model

    Fitness Errors based on Long Term Data

    0.40.5Standard Deviation

    1.11.2Average

    1.11.12004

    1.61.82003

    1.62.02002

    0.60.62001

    1.00.92000

    0.90.91999

    1.51.71998

    0.80.91997

    0.71.01996

    RA model (cm)GFT model (cm)Year of Data

    Height estimation error based on short-term data

    Fitness Analysis

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004

    Year

    RMS(cm) GFT

    RA

    Fitness Errors based on Short Term Data

    Fitness based on RA or GFT model with short-term data is equivalent to the ANN model using long-term data measured at the significant land subsidence area

    Future Study

    Artificial IntelligenceAnalysis Models

    GPS-based 3D Terrestrial & other Auxiliary Data

    Determination & Predictionfor Land Movement

    Information System

    Visualised Land Movement Analysis Tool

    Thanks for your attentionThanks for your attention

    [email protected]@ydu.edu.tw