Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
University of Nigeria Research Publications
ONWUAGBA, Beniah Ndudim
Aut
hor
PG/Ph.D/80/851
Title
Local Field Correction and Short-Range Forces in
the Lattice Dynamics of d-Band Metals
Facu
lty
Physical Sciences
Dep
artm
ent
Physics and Astronomy
Dat
e
May, 1984
Sign
atur
e
LOCAL FIELD CORRECTION AND SHORT-RANGE FORCES
M THE LATTICE DYmAMICS OF +BAND METALS
RENIAH NDUDN ONWUAGBA
B.Sc., M. Phil' . Physics (~i~eria). r~l~h.~/80/851
A Thesis submitted to the Department of Physics m d
Astronomy in the Faculty of Physical Sciences in
fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of
OF THE
UiE53RSITY OF NIGERIA, MSUKKA.
I ' .. .i
MAY 1984
This i s t o certify that the work described
in th i s T F r - i s was carried out by
in the Department of Physics a& Astronorq,
'Jniveraity of Nigeria, Nsukka.
/-- .- d
0
A' '\
1 wish t o express my thanks t o Prof. A.O.E. Animalu
for h i s guhiance, advice and encouragaent in carrying out
t h i s work.
I would l i k e t o express my gratitude t o h i . B.A. O l i
for stimulating discussions. I am very graterul t o Dr. S.
Pal who took over the superviaion of my work from Prof.
A.O.E. flnimalu.
I gratefully acknowledge the financial assistance
promised by the Federal Republic of Nigeria.
Thanks t o my wife, Felicia Ngozi Onwuagba for her
patience and understanding during very trying periods.
Also, I would l ike t o e q r e s s my thanks t o my brothers
Nathaniel C. Onnagba and Christian I. Onwuagba for the i r
f inancieil support.
I a m grateful t o t h t entire s taff of the Computer , >
Centre, University 'ok' Nigeria, Nsuklra far providine me with
the necessasy fac i l5 t ics t o carry out my computations.
And f inal ly, thanks t o Mr. D.N. Ugwu for patiently typing
the manuscript, and Mr. P. ' ~eriie for p repar in~ my diagrams.
iii
Recent experildental and theoret ical studies o r t h e
electron-phonon in te rmt ion in Group VB &band metals vanadium,
niobium an? t an t~Jum which c r y s t d l i z e i n the body - centered
cubic phase, a c ~ i : t ha t t h e i r phonon spectra exhibit same soft
modes believed t o be due t o electronic band s t ructure e f fec ts
and loca l f i e l d corrections. These metals have received
considerable att.ention because of t n e occurrence of these soft
modes; t h e high superconducting t rans i t ion temperature
associeted with then! m d t h e i r compounds such ae vanadium
+in (v3 ~n); and metal insulator t rans i t ion i n vanadium
trioxi.de {V 0 ) m d vanadium n i t r ide (vN), 3 3
The purpose o t t h i s thes i s is t o formulate i n an
inhmmll-J consistent mmner the theory of the loca l field
corrections t o %he dynmical matrix fo r phonon dispersion
relat ion i n these d-band me tds and t o exhibit t h e appa:-ent
cancellation be.t;yew,. theee ooxect ions and repulsive short-
range forces, This w i l l be done i n t he t rans i t ion metal
model potent ia l (T?4MP) approximation of O l i and Animalu
(1916) which w i l l enable I us .. t o investigate t h e poss ib i l i ty of
i-epresent ing t h e loca l f i e l d correction associated with r-d
interactions as an a t t r ac t ive short-range interatomic force
having the same functional form i n r ea l space ae the Barn-Mayer
repulsion due t o the overlap of core electron wavef'unctions
centered on neighbouring ions.
In chapter 2 : we s h d 1 eive a gene~al introduction and
brief survey of the previous work in t h i s f ie ld. I n chapter
2, we sha l l present the m a t h e m a t i ~ ~ l tools based on the
formalism of l a t t i c e dynamics which w i l l de~ena on the
harr~onic and a d i a b ~ t i c qproxhat ions . I n the iy.Smmrk of
these approxbat ims, we sha l l characterize the interatomic
?orces arising from the direct short-rcige and l o n c r a n ~ e
i'orces, and the indirect ion-ion interaction virt t he
polarization f i e l d of the conduct ion electrons ( the electrcm-
@.xon interaction). I n chapter 3, we shaU use the pseudo-
p t e n t i s l approach t o describe t h e contribution f r o m the local
f ieie coTrection in the Transition-Metal Model Potential of
O l i and Anhalu (1976). Tnis w i l l enable us t~ investigate & ,, 4 ,, >.' 3 1s
the contribution t o t h e indirect interaction between ions
v i m the polarization f i e X of the vdence electron gas arising
from s-d interaction contribution t o interatomic pa i r
pot&tisl. In t h i s appYo~ch;' we sha l l adopt direct metho8
using actusl atomic potentials and charge clensittes via 8-8
interaction t o show how the a t t rac t ive short-range forces
V
associated with the loca l f i e ld correction may be d fined t o
have the same fXnctirma1 form in r ea l space as t he repulsive
short-range (~orn-Mayer) potential. In chapter 4, we sha.I.1
discuss the energy bands of trrmsition metals in order t o
display the 9c;-~.rrenoe of s-d hybridization and t o show haw
t h i s hybridization i s simulated in the framework of the
pseudopotential or model potential method. Logically, i n
order t o use the pseudopotential OY - d e l po te i~ t i a l derived
fron: the energy band theory for investigation of electron-
phonon interaction and other electron scattering processes,
it i s necesearj t o sake C ~ E ~ L F distinction between t he
V-matrix (used in Energy band theory) and the 'P-matrix
(required for scattering theory). Tkis dbtincfion will be
inc'rufied in c k p t e r 4. In chapter 5, we shall apply the
above theozy t o the specific examples of vanadium, niobium
ant? tantalum in order t o demonstrate how cancellation between
the local f ie ld4mrrea t ion md t he short-range Born-Eleyer
contribution t o these me-blA occur i n the phonon f'requmcies.
Ant1 i n chapter 6, we shal l obtain numerical results and
compsre them with expa~ipeti2al data. This w i l l be followed
by a summary and the atterldant conclwion.
- v i
TABLE OF CONITNS Page
CERTIFICATION . . . . . . i
ABSTRACT 0 .
TABLE OF CONI'm!Tf: . . . . . . iii
0. . v i
APPENDICES . . . . _ .. viii LIST OF FIGURES . . .. . ix
LIST OF TABLI:..S . . . . - 0 . x
1.1 Introduction . . . . - -. 1
1 . Obtlineof kesearchie+kodr~logy .. . 14
CKAPER. 2 : LrYiTICE DYNAMICS FORMALISM . . . . 17
2.5 Off-diagonal Ccmpozzent of Dielectric 14atris , , . . ' . C ' . I
. . 40
3.1 Introduction . . . . - a . 46
3.2 Pseudopotential Approach- -- . . . 47
3.3 Contribution from Local Field correction 52
3.4 Attractive Short-Range Forces via s-d interaction 5 5
vii Page
CHArmER 4: S-D HYBRIDIZATION IN ENERGY BAND AND mDEL RYlBlTIAL IN d-BAND METALS
Introduction . . . . - .. S-d Hybridization in Energy Band of Transition Metals
Resonance Model in d-band metals .. . . Generalization of the OPW-pseudopotential transfonnation to the d-band metals . . . . d-Band Model Potential . . . . Magnitude of the Orthogonalisation or Depletion Charge - . . . ,a.
The Theor, of T-riratrix Scattering . . .. T-matrix Form Factor . . . . Virtual Bound State Problem . . . .
CEK?TER 5 : APPLICATION TO WE PHONON FREQUENCIES OF d-BAND l@Tm 7-12
5.1 Introduction . . . . - .. 112
5.2 Demnstrz~ion of the Cancellation of Short-Range forces by the local field correction . . 114
5.3 Coulol~b;-c and Born-Mayer Contributions to the phonon frequencies . . ,. . . I . .:', .. . . - 0 . 120
5.4 Calculation of the Electronic Contribution and local Field Corrections to the Phonon frequencies . . 12 5
8 ) _ .- 6.1 Introduction . . . . - . . 137
6.2 Comparison of Calculate6 pilonor1 frequencies with experiment . . . . -_ . . 137
6.3 Sunnnary and Conclusion . . . . 152 References . . . . - .. 195 Biographical Note . . . . . . 200
APPENDICES
Page
A, Isnrmim of the Dielectric Matr'x . . .. 160
B. I.B.M, Computer Program for the Corngutation of the Born-Mayer Contributim . . .. 162
C. 1.B.M. Computer Progx rm for the computation of the Electronic Contribution and Total Phanon Frequencies excluding Local Field Correction . . 171
D. I .B.M. Computer h-ogrcm for the computation of thr? Total Phonon Fr~c~~encies including Local Field Correction. . . ..
LIST OF FIGURES - TITLE PAGE FIGURE
m i n t e r a c t i n g s and d bands . . . . Interacting and hybridized s and d bands for vanadium . . . . - .. Reduced Zone Scheme . . . . Extended Zone Scheme - . . . . Iiigh-lying resonant d-states situated well above the muffin-tin potential . . . . Comparison of the Heine and Abarenkov Model Potential % and the model wave function % with the true potentta.1 V and true wave function @.
Bo-and State . . . . . . Virtual EounG State - . . . . Ecc Brillouin Zone . . . . Phonon Dispersion Curves in Vanadium excluding calculated local f ie ld correction . . Phonon Pispersion Curves in Niobium excluding calculated local f ield correction . . P5.0non Dispersion Curves in Tantalum excluding cdaziated local f ie ld correction . . Phonon Dispersion Curves in Vanadium including calculated .local f ie ld correction . . Phmon Dispersion Curves in Niobium including calculated local f ield correction . . Phonon Dispersion Curves in Tantalum including calculated local f ield correction . .
TABLE
2.1 2.2
2.3 2.4
3.1 5.1 5.2
5.3
5.4
5.5
5.6
5.7
5.8
5.9
5.13 6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.5
6.6
LIST OF TABLES
TITLE
Repulsive (Born-Mayer) Contribution I I 19 I t
I I t 1 I 1
PAGE
a:' for vanadium 30 II I 1 niobium 31 ll II tantalum 32
Parameters for calculation of -1s ive (Born-Mayer) Potential . . . . . . 33
Attractive Born-Mayer Coefficients .. 62
Coulomb Frequencies w2 for bcc metals Electronic Contribution w i for vanadium Electronic Contribvtion 'I niobium
I t 19 " tantalum 131
Local Piold bmxtion wiC for vanadium I I t 1 1 I i 9 " niobium 19 I I I 1 I 1
" talialum Comparison of local field correction by long-range method w i t h our result by short-range method for vanadium . . . . . . 135 Model Potential Parameters . . . . 136
Parameters for Phanon Frequencies Calculation 136 Total Frequency excluding lacal field correction for 140 vanadhn . . . . . . - Total Frequency . I , I . . . . . + excJudkg I local field correction for niobium . . . . . . - 141
Tot a1 Frequency excluding local field correct ion for tantalum . . . . . . - 142
Total Frequency including local field correction for vanadium . . . . . . - 143
Total Frequnw kcludhg local field correction for niobium . . . . . . - 144
Total Frequency including local field correction for tmtalum . . . . . . 14 5
CHAPma 1 --- 1.1 rmTAODUCTION
The study of the subject-matter of l a t t i c e dynamics of
metals is of Fundamental importance for the investigation of
t he thermodynamics, e lectr ical and other physical properties
of metals. Lattice dynamics deals with small displacements
o r vibrations of atoms about t h e i r mean equilibrium position
in the crystal l a t t i ce . Lattice vibration involves a large
number of atoms interscting with one another through forces
which may be represented by springs connecting various
neighbouring atoms. n he quantized normal modes of vibration
are called phonons). The springs provide t he restoring
forces on the atoms when they are displaced from t h e i r
equilibrium positions. Born and Von-Karman (1912) used t h i s
model t o provide a mathematical theory of lattice vibrations,
and considerable development of the formalism of lattice
dynamics has since~theh'"e~6ltted based on various sophisticated
models of interatomic forces in the solids.
A general review of the l a t t i c e dynamics of solids can
be fomd in standard texts, such as Maradudin, Montroll, Weiss
and Ipatova (1971). For our present purpose, we shal l be interested
in the l a t t i c e dynamics of d-band metals, i n part icular the group
2
VB t ransi t ion metals vanadium, niobium and tantalum which
czystallize in the body-centpi-ed cxbic phase. These metsla
have receiv d considerable attention in recent years because
of the apparent connection between the occurrence of soft modes
in t h e i r phonon dispersion curves and the high superconducting
transi t ion temperature associated with them and their compounds
such as vanadium t i n (V ~ n ) and metal insulator t ransi t ion in 3
vanadium trioxide ( ~ ~ 0 ~ ) and vanadium ni t r ide (w). (weber
In the l a t t i c e dynamics of metals i n general, one has t o
deal separately with the metal ions, the valence o r conduction
electrons and the intersction between them. This is a
complicated tnany-body problem. To reduce it t o a t ractable form,
it is customary to i-make the adiabatic or Born-Oppenheimer
approximation, which makes use of the fac t tha t the ions move
so slovly compered with the conduction electrons tha t the system
can be decsupl.ed i n swh a way tha t the ions and the electrons , < , ."6. +' , '
can be treated separately tizl the lowest order while the
interaction betweem them i s fneluded as a perturbation. In t h i s
approximatior?, one can isolate the various terms tha t contribute , .- .*
t o the total. potenti51 eaergy for the motion of the ions, namely,
-the direct coulomb interaction and the exchange core (~orn-Mayer)
replsioa bct;mx ions, wid the inilircct ion-ion interaction via
3
the polarisation f i e l d of the conr lvr5c~ electrons (which i r
associated with the elettron-phonon interaction). fa t h i s
model of t b ~ interatomic potential energy, the frequencies of
l a t t i c e vibrations can be determined e i the r bg the force conrtsnt
method ( ~ o r n snd Huang 1954) or by the reciprooal latt ice method
(~ochran 1963), or by a combination of the two methods.
Generally, the force conatant method is adequate for short-range
forces while the reciprocal l a t t i c e method is required for
deeling with long range forrcee.
A careful investigation of the electm-phonon interaction
involves a detailed knowledge of the electronic energy baad
structure of the metal under consideration. In simple
(nontransition) metals, the energy bands ham the parabolic
shape of s-p bands and an ordinary free-electron d ie lec t r ic
screenkg theory is adequate f o r incorporating these band
structure effects i n the phonon dispersion relation. However,
i n the trru~aiLion netais a ,pe&r&~r free electron broad par8boLic .' , , , , A .I.?>. ,
s-band croc:ses and h y % r i d k s with a tight-binding nsrmw
d-band. For example, i n the 3d transition-series, the broad
s-band associated with tphc )+s atomic level crosses snd interacts 8 ) ._ _.
with the narrow 3d bandz, Tnis s-d hybridizing interaction and
the tight-binding character of the d-electrons give r i s e t o
l o c d :f.;cl.ci efI'%9-.s, vhic'n con?licat= the free-electron d ie lec t r ic
screening theory.
As is well known (Ekenreich and Cohen (1959). Alder (1962)
and Wiser (1963)), locd . f i e l d e f fec t s are associated with t h e
screening action of bound o r v i r t u a l bound electrons i n
c rys ta l l ine materials which involve the dynmicaJ. matrix f o r
phonon dispersion v i a the electron-phonon interact ion, o r what
i s the same thing, the interact ion between ions v i a t h e
polar isa t ion f i e l d of t h e conduction electrons. I n t h e l a t t i c e
dynamics of the t r ans i t i on m e t a l s characterized by the v i r t u a l
bound nature of t h e i r d-electrons, t he local f i e l d e f f ec t s
appear v ia t h e non-vanishing off-diagonKL components of t h e -1 A 2
inverse d i e l ec t r i c matrix E (g,gt) which determines the l i nea r
response of the conduction electrons t o a periodic c rys t a l
potent ia l i n a rn2tal.
Because of the c~mplexi ty of the l oca l f i e l d correction,
various approximate procedures have been developed f o r incor-
porating it i n the phonon spectrum calndekion in semiconductors ,<. . .*. ,,' , *
and t r ans i t i on metals, where such corrections are important.
Prakash m d Joshi (1970) in t h e i r calculation of t h e phonon
spectrum of nickel used non-interaction s and d-band scheme I, - .r
so t h a t only t he diagonal par t of t he d i e l ec t r i c matrix was
involved in the calculation. Van Vechten and Martin (1972) .A -A
approximated ~ ( ~ , g ' ) bv e finrite dimensiond (53 x 59) dimensional
5
matrix which was then invertod with the a id of the computer. In ord-
er of s i m p l i c i e t h i s conylicated prcblem, Hanke (1973a) showed
tha t by working with a tightbinding basis se t , only a f i n i t e
dimensional matrix need be inverted, the dimension of which is
determined by the number of overlapping tight-binding basis
h c t i o n s : he prcpoaed a factorization ansatz f o r the
d ie lec t r ic matrix which allows a complete inveq%dn procedure
leading t o a simple form of the loca l f i e l d corrections. Also
Hanke ( l973b) extended h is cFilcul~tions t o paramagnetic nickel
and palladium and included the diagonal and off-diagonal parts
of the d-d intraband t rens i t ions which give r i s e t o dipolar
model of l a t t i c e dynamics of t rans i t ion metals while
neglecting the diagonal and off-diagonal par ts of the d ie lec t r ic
m t r i x f o r d-s, s-d d-d interband transit ions.
Another factorization ansatz f o r the d i e l ec t r i c matrix was
proposed by Sinha e t al (1974) which was useful in the study
of l a t t i c e dynanics otl instdlators end se~jconductors. The
work in t h i s direction was fur ther extended by using 2nd order
Brilloxin-Wiper perturbation scheme by Bertoni e t al (1974).
The off-diapona elenents of the d ie lec t r ic matrix in the study
of l a t t i c e vibrations. and effective ion-ion potential , give
r i s e t o ncn-central forces between the ions znd sa t i s fy the 2
correct q + o l i m i t f o r thz l o ~ g i t u d i n d acoustic modes by
M f i l m e n t of acoustic sum rule. A few year l a t e r , Koichi and
Hisashi (1971) adopted the Lsedis t ic band models t o obtain the
microscopic d i e l ec t r i c clatrix for s i l i con and germanium i n the
random phase rzpproxima-i;ion (RPA) . Subsequently , Nizzoli (1977)
used a proper model Hmiltonian t o describe the covalent band
m d modified sg3 orDitals as basis s t a t e s t o evaluate the inverse
d ie lec t r ic tensor e i 0 ( d i n c rys ta l l ine t r igonal Se along
two symmetry directions. But recently, Sturm (1979) had shown
t h e generalization of the longitudinal d i e l ec t r i c function of
Ehrenreich and Cohen by Alder (1962) and Wiser (1963) to the
local f i e l d effect. Also, Inkson (1978), Littlewood (1979),
Van Camp e t al (1979), Oliveira and Inkson (1979) included
loca l f i e ld through the off-diagonal elements of the d ie lec t r ic a 4
matrix €(g,g1) and found the correction important i n the cubic
I V - V I compound, insulators and semiconductore.
I n t h i s thes i s we sha l l begin by using the pseudopotential
o r model pot^; t i a l me0'hOd''in ' t rea t in6 loca l f i e l d correction,
The model po t en t i a l method was first applied t o t rans i t ion
metals by A n ~ m l u (1973a), who called it the t rans i t ion metal
model potent ia l (TNMP) method beciuse it incorporates s-d
hybridizatior- h the resonmce model (Ziman (1965), Heine
(1907), Hubbard (19673 md hi-l;h e t z i l (1974). O l i and Animalu
(1976) achieved a i l inversion of the die lec t r ic matrh by applying
7
a pseudopotential transformation t o the t rue Bloch AvlcCions i n
the standard expression f o r t he d i e l ec t r i c metrix in t h e l i nea r
response theory. O l i (39%) extended t h i s t3eory t o thorium
and recently t o Zirconhn ( 0 l i 1981).
In practice, the evaluation of t he l oca l f i e l d correction
involves a complfca-ked t r i p l e s u m t i o n over an i n f i n i t e set
of reciprocal l a t t i c e vectors, and it is d i f f i c u l t t o aohieve
numerical r e su l t s consistent with the symmetry requirements
whenever t he summations are cut o f f after a f i n i t e number of
reciprocd. l a t t i c e vectors is included. To t h i s end, we wish
i n t h i s thes i s t o investigate the poss ib i l i ty of representing
the l oca l f i e ld correction associated with s-d in teract ions as
an a t t r ac t ive short-range i-nteratomic force having the same
functional fonn i n r e d space as the Born-Mayer repulsion due
t o t h e overlap of core-electron wavefunctions centered on
neighbouring ions. Onwuagba and Animalu (1981) have recently
reported t h ~ premble of t h i s theory. < ,< 4 - 6 >. , *
Experimentally, ine las t ic neutron s n ~ t t ering is currently
the most powerf'ul t oo l f o r the measurement of the phonon
dispersion re la t ion i n solids. 1t.h well known t h a t neutrons
are producec? by fissi.on of heavy nuclei , such as uranium-235.
Neutrons prod-uced by t h i s technique are f a s t and have a;n
average energy of abm% 2MeV. Hcwever, neutrons can be slowed
down by passing the beam through enough matter u n t i l the
6
beam i s i n thermal equilibrium with the molecular motions in
t he material. Then, such ~ e u t r o n s a re reearded ss slow o r
t h e m 1 neutrons with m- .~g ie s dk t r ibu ted about t he value of
O.025eV. The wave1eng:h of a neutron having t h i s energy is of
the order of 18, which means t ha t they a re l i a b l e t o diffraction
by crys ta l planes. However, neutrons serve as an excellent
probe f o r l a t t i c e dynamical studies of sol ids on account of the
f ac t t h a t neutrons in te rac t with both nuclei and magnetic, or
unpaired electrons, md t h a t slow neutrons have energies and
wavelengths t h a t match those of excitations and col lect ive
modes e.g. rotational energy leve ls i n molecules and acoustic
and optic phonons i n solids.
The most useful scat-bering processes are those involving
one phonon scat ter inz, Subject t o the ejcj~tence of coupling
mechanism, the s ingle ghonons produce s ignif icant sca t te r in8
and tile ~easurement of t h i s yields valuable and direct i n f o r
m s t ion on > k i l ~ ; l spegt~~rm.,, ,,The incoherent scat ter ing ~ i v e a
in format io~ fibout the frcqwncy distribti t ion functions, while
the one-phor,on coherent sccbtei-ing i s used for finding frequency
(v ) versus phuncn wave vector (G) dispersion relations. The , . .. one-phonon xllerent scat ter ing process o b e p energy and crys ta l
momentum conservation laws:
i i
KO - K' = q (1.2) -h
where Eo, E' a r e t he i n i t i d and f i n a l energies, c, Kt the
corresponding neutron wave vectors, v i s the frequency of a 9
4
l a t t i c e wave of wave vector q, m i s the neutron mass, and h n Q
is t he momentum transfer . Thus, f ron accurate measurement of .A 2
KO, K' and t h e energy lo s s of the scat tered neutron beam as a
function of t he sca t te r ing direction, t he phonon frequency (v)
versus phonon wave vector (i) dispersion r e l s t i on is determined.
Nakagawa and Woods (1963) applied t h e above technique using
the chalk River t r ip le-axis spectrometer i n i ts constant-Q mode
of operation rockho house 1960), f o r l a t t i c e waves t rave l l ing -1
along the symmetry direct ions $00.-j , '110 1 and. /'111] f o r ..I I. ... i
niobium. The i n i t i a l s l o ~ e s of t he dispersion curves a r e in
pood agreement with those calculated from the measured e l a s t i c
constants reported by Bolef (1961), and s t r i k i n ~ features
include : -;. ,,....;,.I: ,;. . , . , v i .'. .
( i ) The i 1 0 0 ~ longitudinal (L) and transverse (T) branches L . .
cross st (-$--)q = 0.7. The crossing over of the 2T
acoustical branches i n t h e absence of a synnetry
requirement i s p d c d & t o t h i s material.
( ii) me twa nondegenerate j'110 / T branches (designated by - T and T ~ ) in te rsec t a t (&)q = 0.3. 1
a ( i i i ) Anomalies occur in t h e 111 1 L branch a t (-i;;)q = 0.49
l
and pronounced chcnges in slope a t (*$)q = 0.47 and
f o r the T branch.
Analysis of t h e data on the basis of the Born-von Karman theory
(1912) indicates t ha t the effect ive interatomic forces are of
very long range nature, therefore, t he actual forces i n t h e
metal m e quite complic&tcd.
Bearing in mind the complicated nature of the interatomic
forces i n a metal, Woods (1964) determined the frequency-wave
vector dispersion re la t ion v(q) f o r l a t t i c e waves t rave l l ing i n
-1 ' -- - - I
the high symmetry directions (100 i, 110 1 a d 1 111 ; for tantalum . - .i -- L
at 296'~. The experiment was carr ied out using the t r i p l e
axis neutron spectrometer i n i ts constant Q mode of operation
m d with variable incident neutron e n e r a 0.0225eV. The
specimen consisted of three s ingle crysta ls each 5cm long and
aboxt l c m i n diameter. The (110) plane was perpendicular t o t he
cyl indr ical axis whcic4*,~as, aounted ver t ical ly . Each of t he
three crysta ls could be oriented indepencently and t h e i r
alignment was carr ied out by means of neutron deffraction. The
measured mosnic spreo,d of the (222) plane measured in t he I, - ..
pa ra l l e l posit ion against a germanium single c rys ta l was about
directions a r e obtained with many of the features s imilar t o
those previously observed f o r niobiwas. For example, the
I- - I , 100 i L and T branches a r e nbserved t o cross a t q = 0.7 and t h e -. -1
tendency f o r t h e [lo0 / m d [110 1 transverse branches t o deviation L
from norm1 dispersive behaviour is apparent. Hexever, these
fe3tures do not appear t o be a s pronounced i n tantslum as they
a re i n niobium. It should be noticed t h a t , unlike the case f o r
niobium, the r1103 T1 and T branches apparently do not L 2
in te rsec t i n tantalum. The reason f o r t h i s behaviour i s t h e t in
tantalum the e l a s t i c constant Cb4 is greater than (C -C )/2 11 12
whereas in niobium, Cb4 is l e s s than (cll-cl2)/2.
Colella and B a t t e m n ( 3 970) adopted n similar experimental
technique t o vanadium. Both authors measured t h e phonon
frequencies along the principal symmetry directions i n vanadium
by means of thermal diffuse-scattering of X-rays. The frequencies
corresponding t o a phonon wave vector are obtained from the
absolute intensi ty of the thermal sca t te r ing a t the appropriate
sac t te r ing vector. , , $ The . . t .. deqpil . exper imata l tzchnique employs
a proportional counter SPG-6 ( ~ e n e r a l ~ l e c t r i c ) operated a t
1870V, followed by a charge-sensitive preamplifier and a single-
channel analyser. The strong Wol vanadium fluoresence were reduced I / " A ..
t o a negligible l eve l with adequate f i l t e r s while t h e polishing
and annealing procedure t:as adopted t o eliminate sca t te r ing
associated with i m p p i t i e s . By t h i s technique, the dispersion
12
curves of vanad5um have been determined along the principal
symmetry directions I 100 ' j110 md 1 111 -1 . These dispersion 1-
curves have slopes a t the origin In agreement with the e l a s t i c
constants determined bj u l t r a s ~ n i c techniques. Within
experimental errors involved, the dispersion curves could be
adequately f i"vtd t o a Born-von Karman model with interactions
extended out t o seven neighbours.
Therefore in contract t o the other featureless dispersion
curves f o r simple bcc metals such as potassium, those f o r group
VB t ransi t ion metals vanadium, niobium, tantalum and t he i r compounds
were found t o exhibit a l o t of interesting s t r ~ c t u r e s . These
anomalous features were discussed on the basis of the Kohn
anomaly (powell e t a1 (1968), (1977) 1, t o which through the
Fed-surface nesting: s m a l l anomalies observed in simpler
metals had been attributed.
Previously it was thought
high-T superconductor TaC and C , -6. >. ,
tha t the pronounced anomalies for
the lack of the anomalies in the
nonsupercond~~ctor HfC seem t o support the conjecture tha t the
phonon anomalies were closely related t o superconductivity i n
general. But t h i s conjec'iiure is now found t o be more subtle. 1, - ..
For exmple, in sp i te of the low superconductivity t ransi t ion
temperature for I%, the metsl seems t o show anomalous dispersion
curves ( ~ e b e r , 1930)~ Nevertheless, a close relationship
between the momctlies and supercol?c?-wtivity does seem t o exis t ,
and one generally expects ?o 2ind some type of anomaly i n the
phonon diepers ion cilXwiTi:r of high- Tc ~uperconductors , although
a low-T superconductor xay also show rather strong anomalies. C
The anomalies and superconductivity should be t reated as the
resul t s of, o r differen5 manifestations of, the same electronic
property of the metal. Weber (1.980) has shown tha t the
relat ion between phono~ anomalies and ~ u p e ~ c o n d u e t i ~ i t y may
best be i l lus t ra ted by comparing the phonon linewidths.
Nevertheless, the important parameter which deternines the
t ransi t ion temperature Tc ie the electron-phonon coupling
constant A ( ~ c ~ i l l a n 1963). For simple metals, one can
rel iably estimate X by using pseudopotentials ( ~ i m n 1962,
Allen and Cohen 197'3 j . h t for the 8-band metals, we can use
McMillant a strong coirpling theory. In t h i s approach, we
hem tha t i n the rigid-ion, one electron approximation
2 1 = n(ey)<l (1.3)
where M i s t L e ~ tomic msss; a2> is the r c n o m l i z e d phonon
frequency; n(€ ) is the density of s t s t e s ?or one %ype of F 2
spin. a t the Fermi energy,, e ; n d <I > is the square of the I?
electron--i::ionori matrix element averaged over the F e d surface.
By determining A fi.m the experimentdy measured Tc, and
<a2> from neutrrjil scat-tering experiments, McMillan (1968) has
It 2 evaluated n(tzp) <I > f o r most of t he supe~y:onducting m e t s l s .
The most s t r i k ing r e su l t j u that while both II(E ) and <id> vary F 2 considerably from element t o elxment, n(cF)<l > remains
2 approximtely constant (,.- 7 e ~ / 8 ) f o r a l l t he bcc t r ans i t i on
metals.
Therefo-e, t he character is t ic feature of t rans i t ion metala
is t h a t t he electron-ion interact ion potent ia l v(=] hss a d
resonance above the muffin-tin zero. A s is well hnown, this
resonance l i e s near the F e d energy and is believed t o be
responsible f o r many of t h e most s t r i k ing properties of
t r ans i t i on metals. From t h i s p i n t of view, we s h a l l i n t h i s
present research c la r i fy the ro le played by such resonance i n
determining the strength of t h e electron-phonon interaction.
1 ,2 - OUTLINE OF RYKYJT;'-1_CR Mi3TH@JXILC!-C~
W e have a l r e a e s ta ted above t h a t t he objective of t h i s thesis
is t o explore a representation of the l oca l f i e l d correction as
an a t t r a c t i r e short-xanta;e force which tends t o cancel o r screen
t h e usual Born-Mayer r e p d s i v e short,-range force due t o the
overlap of the wavef'unctrions of electrons c e n t e r d on
neighbouring ions. To c lear t h e ground f o r t h i s investigation - .. we s h a l l hegjn by presenting the mathematical t oo l s based on the
formalism of Lat t ice djmamiks in chapter 2. This formalism w i l l
depend on the haxmo~.ic and adiabatic approximations. I n the
15
framework of these ~pproximstions, -.-I sha l l characterize the
interatomic forces a r i s inc fmm the direct short range and lone
range forces, and the indirect ion-ion interact ion v i a the
polarisation f i e l d of the conduction electrons ( the electron-
phonon interact ion).
The electron-phonon matrix element C. which is proportional % A
t o the screened pseudopotential o r model potent ia l form factor ,
~ ( q ) , depends on the electronic s t ructure of the solid. In the
simple (nearly-free-electron) metals, t h e screening of the
pseudopotential o r model potent ia l may be represented by a free-
electron d ie lec t r ic function. However, i n t r a n s i t ion (d-band)
metals, loca l field corrections a re called in to play: the
representation of the screening of the t r a n s i t ion metal
pseuc?opotential o r model potent ia l requires therefore t h e use
of a ctielectric matrix whose off-diaponal components characterize
the loca l f i e l d corrections.
I n chapter 3, w e , s h d . l . w o t he ~ceufiopotential approach t o
describe t h e contribution from the loca l f i e l d correction in
t h e Transition Metal Model Potential of O l i end Animalu (1976).
This w i l l ezable us t o investiqate , - .. the ccntribution t o the
indirect Lzteraction 'cetween ions v i a the polarizetion f i e l d of
the valence electron gas a r i s ing from s-d interaction contribution
t o interatomic ?a i r potential. In ih is approach, we sha l l adopt
16
direct method using actual atomic pt.entirzls and charge densit ies
v ia s-d intercction t o show how the a t t rac t ive short-range forces
associated with the loca l f i e l d correction nay be defined t o
have the same f'unctional f o m i n r e a l s p c e as the repulsive
short-range (~orn-~4ayer ) potent id.
In chapter 4, w e shall discuss t h e enerm bmds of t ransi-
t ion metals in order t o display the occurrence of s-d hybridiza-
t i on and t o show how t h i s hybridization is simulated in the
framework of the pseudopotential o r model potent ia l nethod.
Logically, in order t o use the pseudopotential o r nodel potential
derived from the energy band theory f o r the investigation of
electron-phonon interacticm m d other electron scat ter ing
processes, it i s necessary t o make a c lear d i s t inc t ion between
the V-matrix (used i n Ehergy band theory) and the T-matrix
(required Tor scattering theory). This dis t inct ion w i l l be
made i n chapter 4.
I n chapter 5, we shel1,apply the above theory t o the ,,, 4 . t . . 5
specif ic examples of vanadium, niobium and t ~ n t a l u m i n order t o
demonstrate how cancellation between the l oca l f i e l d correction
and the shor t - ran~e ( ~ o r n - ~ n ~ e r ) contribution of these metsls I) .> .-
occur il the phonon dispemion curves. An6 i n chapter 6 , we shall
obtain numerical resu l t s and compare them with experimental
data. This w i l l be followed by a summary and the attenfiant
conclusion.
LATTICE DYNAMICS FORMALISM
2.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, we have presented the gene*
introduction t o the subject-matter of l a t t i c e dynamics and a
review of both the theoret ical and experimental background of
the aspects of l a t t i c e dynamics i n d-band metals. Also, we have
indicated i n chapter 1, the aspect of l oca l f i e l d correction
t h a t i s dealt with i n t h i s thesis . In order t o develop t h e
too ls f o r investigating the relationship between the loca l f i e l d
correction and short range forces i n d-band metals, we proceed
i n t h i s chapter t o formulate l a t t i c e dynamics from t h e f i r s t
principles.
I n section 2.2, we sWl derive the phonon dispersion
re la t ion i n the hamonic approximation: the dispersion
re la t ion w i l l depend on the interatomic forces through the
dynamical matrix. In ' iie'i.iidhli. 3, we sha l l discuss the short-
range (~orn-Mayer) par t clue t o overlap of core wave Punction
and the long-range ion-ion coulomb interaction part of the
interato&c forces. In secti'bn -2;f , we s h a l l describe how the
electronic Land s t ructure contribution due t o the indirect ion-
ion interaction v ia the polarisation f i e l d of the conduction
electrons involves the screening action of t he eas of conduotion
electrons through the electron-p5ona.n interact ion matrix
elements g s,AB which are proportional t o the screened pseudo-
potential o r model potentiel f o m factor viq). And i n section
2.5, we s h a l l show how the off-diagonel. part of d ie lec t r ic
matrix a r i s ing from the electronic contribution is determined
by the depletion hole associated with the nonlocal model
potential VM.
2.2 PHONON DISPERSION REZATION
We proceed i n t h i s section t o derive the dispersion
re la t ion for the l a t t i c e waves in the harmonic approximation.
For t h i s purpose only small displacements of t he atoms about
t h e i r mean equilibrium positions w i l l be considered. Also,
we s h e l l consider a Bravais l a t t i c e of atoms of chemical
valancs z crystal l iz ing in a cubic phase.
L e t the displacement of t he nth atom i n t he direction be
denoted by u.(n) where a = x,y,z. The kinet ic energy of the
nth atom i s gi-ven - ,< 4 . 6 , , . . ,,,, . .
U where M is the mass of the atom and va(n) = dt
is the velocity
Therefore the t o t a l kinet ic , ens& of 8 system of Il atoms i n
a crystal i? given by
19
In te rns of t he momentum, %(a) r: ??$(xi), Eq. (2.2) becomes
The t o t a l potent ia l energy of t h e c rys ta l as a function of
t h e instantaneous positions of all the ions is
where Rn - - Rno + u,(n), Rno being the equilibrium posit ion and
ua(n) t he displacement f r o m equilibrium. In t h e harmonic
approxhi t ion, we expand t h e potent ia l energy i n powers of the
displacements and re ta in terms up t o t he second order i n t he
displacements :
The subscript '0' means t h a t t he quantity is evaluated a t t h e
eqc.l:t.?'br-ium configuration. The f i r s t term i n t h e expansion is
t he equilibrium energy which is a constant and may be s e t equal
t o zero; the second term is zero b e c a ~ s e 3W/au (n) evaluated c ,< . .'. >>' , * , J
Q
at equilibrium posit ioa i s zero; and the t h i r d term which is
the second orOer o r harmonic term is characterized by the
non-zero force constants,
This represents t he force on the nth atom i n t h e a direct ion
when the mth atom is given a uni t displacement i n t h e B
direction. Thus,
The equation of motion of the n''''."' tiSox is therefore,
In order t o obtain the dispersion relation, we assume t he wave
in the crystal is a simple harmonic wave. Then, 8 travelling: I harmonic wave~bolution of the equation of motion is of the form
where
< = the l a t t i c e wave vector
s = longitudinal (L) or transverse (T T ) polarization 1' 2
inaex hS A
~ ~ ( q ) unit pclai-ieation vector with a = 1,2,3 being r,
2. = amplitude of t5e wave 9
Substituting f o r u (n) i n to the equation of motion (2.8) a
yields -,r ,, . , $ . ,.. ,
i ( q . ~ n o w t ) m s i( G.$.owt ) - ~ o ' ~ ; ( < ) e = z eB(<)e
no
MultLplying by c i ( c ) t!("p)eiq*Rno , eliminating the common factor -- .-
e -iwt, atld r.-oxe-.ging u:; g&t
21
Using the f ac t t ha t t he com?onent o f the polarization
vectors arc orthogonal, i.e.
where 6aX i s the Kronecker de l ta with the property t h a t
= 1, if u = X
= 0, otherwise
equation (2.10) may be rewritten i n the f o m
This can be rewrit ten as
where
i s the cfyn~mical matrix. It is the Fourier transform of the force
constant. Equation (2.13) is the dispersion re la t ion f o r the
l a t t i c e wave. The dl~p+s'/ZjTi re la t ion may be writ ten i n the
e x ~ l i c i t matrix form
Wow, because of t he 2er iodici ty of the c i ~ s t a l l a t t i c e , we have
t ha t
i.e. t he force constants a r e functions of the distances, between
the atoms concerned. Moreover,
C a2w = O (2.17) n aua(n)au8(m)
because i f all a tcss a re given equal displacement, the resul tant
force on any part icular atom, say t h e n t h atom is zero. Putting
the nth atom at the cr igin , we may express the dynmical matrix
in the form
and hence, bj vi r tue fir Equation :2.17), we get 2.
A a2w iq.R ~ ~ ~ ( d = - " (U (o)au (m) > o (1-e mo)
]do a e In practice, summation over the d i rec t l a t t i c e i n r e d . ,,,," .,.. ,'. > > ' . , . , . . J * , '
s p c e dces not converge r q j d l y f o r long r m c e forces. There-
fore it is frequently useful t o derive an a l te rna t ive
eq re s s ion fo r D (q) i n which the sumnation is carr ied out i n aB
, "- .- the reciprccal l a t t i c e space, a procedure introduced or iginal ly
by Cochran (1963). F w our p rposes we need cnly consider
potent ie l energy functions t ha t can be expressed a s s sum of
two-body effect ive pairwise potent ia ls i n the form (2.4) i u e u
Taking Fourier transform gives
and t he force constant becomes
Thus t he dynamical matrix by v i r t ue of Eqn. (2.19) becomes
Now, using the completeness re la t ions viz.
a where g is the reciprocal I.%ttice vector, then t h e dynamical
matrix is of t he form
Then, subst i tut ing Eq. (2.26) in Eq. (2.25), t he f i n a l form of
the dynamicel matrix becomes
!The choice between the expression (2.19) and (2.27) depends upon
the type of force actin8 between the ions. In the case of
short range forces, however, we can work i n reaJ space and the
form cf Eq. (2.19) is adequate. But fo r long range forces such
8s the ion-ion interaction of coulomb potent ia l o r the ion-ion
interaction v i a the polarisation f i e l d of conduction electrons,
Eq. (2.27) is most appropriate.
2.3 SHORT RANGE AND TGTG WTGE FORCES
In t h i s section, w? ~ r o c e c d t o describe the short range and
lone range parts of the interatomic forces discussed i n t he
previous section. I n a solid, t he vave functions of adjacent
4 - 6 .. . ,* a t o ~ i c cores overlap"-to s a x ext?nd, giving r i s e t o short
range repulsive interactions. These repulsive interactions are
s t ructure dependent and cannot be ignored i n the interatomic
forces because they are significant whsn compared with the Van
der Wads type of interaction.
Then, subst i tut ing Eq. (2.26) in Eq. (2.25), the f i n a l form of
the dynamical matrix becomes
The choice between the expression (2.19) and (2.27) depends upon
the type of force acting between the ions. In the case of
short range forces, however, we can work i n r ea l space and the
form cf Eq. (2.19) is adequate. But fo r long range forces such
as t he ion-ion interaction of coulomb potential o r the ion-ion
interaction v ia the polarisation f i e l d of conduction electrons,
Eq. (2.27) is most appropriate.
2.3 SHOW RANGE AND JEJG RANGE FORCES
In t h i s section, wz nrrocecd t o describe the short range and
lone ranee parts of the interatomic forces discussed i n the
previous section. I n a solid, t he xeve functions of adjacent
,,-; 4 -6. >.. 5 I + , . atonic cores overlap co sale extsnd, giving r i s e t o short
range repulsive interactions. These repulsive interactions a re
s t ructure dependent md cannot be ignored in the interatomic
forces because they a re s ignif icant whsn comyared with the Van
der Wads type of interaction.
According t o e l e c t r o s t a t i c theory, t h e in te rac t ion energy
o t two nonoverlapplng spher ical ly symmetric charge d i s t r ibu t ion
is e e /r where e and e are t h e t o t a l charges associated 1 2 12' 1 2
with t h e two d i s t r ibu t ions and r is t h e dis tance between t h e i r 12
centres. Similarly, t h e t o t a l e l e c t r o s t a t i c energy Ue of n
such charges of naenitude e. ( i = l , . . . ,n) 5.5 1
Ue = C Yi r.. pa i r s 1j
i n which t h e summation extents over a l l p a i r s o f charges, each
p a i r being considered once. This may be wr i t t en i n t h e form
'e xi = $ 1 (2.29)
i , j i j
where t h e summation i s now a double sum over a l l charges and
t h e superscr ip t prime indicates t h a t t h e cases i= j e r e t o be
excluded.
The repulsive force ' b e txzn ions i s very s m a l l u n t i l t h e
ions ecme in to contact, when t h i s force increases more rapidly
than t h e e lec t ros+,a t ic force. It 1~n.s e a r l i e r assumed t h a t , ,, . - 5 . ,.' , I *
t h e repulsive force2 beLt.?ea ions gave r i s e t o an interact5on
energy of t h e type
f o r t h e ent;ire c ry s t a l , where A and n a r e constants and r i s
t he distance between neares t unlike ions. However, i f we
assume t h a t only nearest neighbouring ions contribute t o Eq.
(2.30), t h i s term implies tha t ions repel each other with a
?+1 central force tha t varies as l!rL . But investigetLons carried out on interatomic forces on
t h e basis of quantum rnechrnics indicated that a repulsive term
of Eq. (2.30) was not consistently correct, although it may be
a f a i r approximation for a short range of r. Barn and Mqer
empirical intemtomic potential t o represent the interaction
tha t ar ises as a resul t of the mutual overlap between the
electron wavefunctions centred on neighbadring atoms. This
Born-Mayer potectial , as it i s called, is necesssrily a short
range potential and has the form
a t a separation R between two &tms A and b being empirical
Born and May~r found that they could take p as 0.345 x 10-~cm \ - --
for a l l types of ions i f they determined A from the equation
Here, A i s 2.25 x 10-l2 erg f o r all types of ion, b is another
f ixed constant, z and z. a re the valences of two interaction ions, i J
n. and n. a re t he numbers of valance electrons i n t he outer she l l s 1 J
of the ions Roi and R are t he ionic rad i i , and R . . i s t he 0 j 1.1
separation of the ions ( ~ e i t z 1940). The introduction of such
potent ia l was important in order t o account f o r the cohesive
energy of the ionic compounds of the a lka l i metals, such as NaCl,
i n which the Born-Mayer potent ia l , being repulsive, c o u n t e r
balances the tendency of a l a t t i c e b u i l t from an al ternat ing
+ array of posit ive ( ~ a ) and negative (cI-) ions t o collapse
under t h e i r mutual nearest-neighbour coulomb at t ract ion. Such
Born-Mayer potent ia ls were introduced i n the study of the
binding and vibrational energies of the pure a lka l i metals.
Benedek (1977) has studied the problem of core overlap
interactions i n metals and ta5ulated the Born-Mayer parameters
f o r three a l k a l i metals, namely, sodium ( ~ a ) , potassium (K)
and rubidium 1,3... (~b),. . bu; , not Tor Cesium (cs). He also comyared h i s
parameters t o those extracted from Gilbert 's work (see Gilbert
(1968)) f o r N a , K and Rb. Recently, Upadhyaya e t al (1980)
have calculated the contribution from the Born-Mayer type I, _ . I
repulsive interactions t o the s t ructure coefficient a f o r K and
Rb by using both Benedek and Gilbert parameters, Their resu l t s
show t h a t short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) interaction reduces the
binding energy more f o r t h c bcc phase than f o r the fcc and hcp phases.
Here, A i s 2.25 x 10-l2 erg f o r all types of ion, b i s another
fixed constant, z. and z are the valences of two in teract ion ions, 1 j
n. and n. a r e the numbers of valance electrons i n t he outer she l l s 1 J
of the ions Roi and R are t he ionic rad i i , 8nd R.. i s t he 03 1 J
separation of the ions (Seitz 1940). The introduction of such
potent ia l was important in order t o account f o r the cohesive
energy of the ionic compounds of the a lka l i metals, such as NaC1,
in which the Born-Mayer potent ia l , being repulsive, counter-
balances the tendency of a l a t t i c e b u i l t from an al ternat ing
+ array of posit ive (Na ) and negative (cI-) ions t o collapse
under t h e i r mutual nearest-neighbour coulomb at t ract ion. Such
Born-Mqer potent ia ls were introduced i n t he study of the
binding and vibrational energies of the pure a l k a l i metals.
Benedek (1977) has studied the problem of core overlap
interactions i n metals and tabulatec? the Born-Mayer parameters
fo r three a l k a l i metals, namely, sodium (Na) , potassium (K)
and rubidium I ( (~b)?. . . . bus , not fo r Cesium (cs). He also compared h i s
parameters t o those extracted from Gilbert 's work (see Gilbert
(1968)) f o r N a , K and Rb. Recently, Upadhyqa e t a1 (1980)
have calculated the contribution from the Born-Mayer type I, ..
repulsive interactions t o the s t ructure coefficient a f o r K and
Rb by using both Benedek and Gilbert parameters. Their r e su l t s
show t h a t short,-rang e ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) in te rac t ion reduces the
binding energy more f o r t he bcc phase than f o r the fcc and hcp phases.
However, i n t he pure alkali metals and even i n t h e non-
t r an s i t i on polyvalent metals, the Born-Mayer contributions a r e
usual ly small compared with t he d i r ec t coulomb repulsion
between t he pos i t ive ions and i t s screening by t he valence
e lect ron gas. The reason f o r t he smallness of t he Born-Mayer
po t en t i a l in these simple (non-transition) metals lies..
i n t h e v a l i d i t y of t h e so-called small-core approximation
introduced t y Harrison (1966) i n connection with t h e ~ s e u d o -
p t e n t i a l nethod, According t o t h i s app-oxination, t h e
adjacent ion cores do not overlap i n these metals, s o t h a t the re
is p r ac t i c a l l y no d i r ec t in te rac t ion between t he ion cores
e x c e ~ t t h e i r coulomb repulsion, But t h i s approximation is not
expected t o hold f o r t he noble metals (CU, Ag and AU) and t he
t r a n s i t i o n metals, such as V, Ms and Ta, because t he d-shells
a re much too 1arg.e and the d-electrons associated with these
s h e l l s cannot be t r e a t ed a s conduction e lect rons , and addi t ional , ,< . q. >> , I d -
complication a r i s e s from t h e in te rac t ion of t h e d-electrons
with t he s - e l ec t rms ( c d l e d sd-hybridization i n t h e energy
band theory). 1, . .I
The expes s ion f o r t he contribution of short-range
po ten t ia l of t h e Born-Mayer type t o the Qmamical matrix i s
A
where 1 gn{ is the se t of direct lattice vedara, and R = R .e na n a
A
is the ath component of Rn. Because of t he exponential factor,
we sha l l sum over the f i r s t and a t most second nearest neighbours
i. e. d a Rn 5 ($)(+I. ~ 1 % I s ( ~ ) ( + 2 , O,OA ( 1 2% 0) and
Typical resul ts of our calculations for t he Born-Nayer potential
t o which we sha l l return l a t e r i n chapter 5 i s presented in
Tables 2.1, 2.2 and 2.3 f o r Vanadium, niobium and tantalum. The
parameters used i n the computer calculation of these numerical
values will be shown in Table 2.4.
< ,< . . c >. 3
TABLE 2.1
Repulsive (~orn-Mayer) Contribution o: ( i n units w2) far P
Vanadium
-L 2 .a q K 1 1 q = q(1,0,0) a = q(1,1,0) q = q ( l , l , l )
L T L T1 T2 L T
TABLE 2 .2
Repulsive (E3m-n-Mayer) Carribdim 0: (in units lom2 u2 for niobium P
33
TABLE 2.4
Parameters for Calculation of Repulsive (Born-~ayer) PotentiaL
Vanadium Niobium Tantalum
~ ( 1 ) z ~ ( 6 ) = p = constant ( A ) 0.345 0.345 0.345
~ ( 2 ) = A = constant (ergs) 2.2 5x10-l2 2 .25xl0-l2 2 . 2 5 ~ 1 6 ~ ~
~ ( 3 ) = a = l a t t i c e canstant (E) 8.01 3.30 3.31
~ ( 4 ) = ionic mass ( a ) 0 .84727~10-~~ 1.542401rl0-*~ 2 . 9 9 4 9 1 ~ 1 0 - ~ ~
~ ( 5 ) = vp = plasma freq. (BZ) 3?.189*10 2 5 . 5 5 9 ~ 1 0 ~ ~ 18.3422~10~~
Z2 E 2rg r equilibrium b
separation (8) 1.18 1.38 1.36
~ ( 1 ) = density (g/cm") 6.09 8.58 16.66
M(2) = Z = chemical valence 5+ 5+ 5*
~ l ( 3 ) = R = atomic volume
(atomic units) 93.90 121.30 121.33
Al(5) = ionic radius ( 2 ) 0.5900 0.6900 0.6800
The symbols B ( I ) , ~ ( 2 ) etc are the designation of the parameters
i n the coquter programne of Appendix B. ) < . +' . )>
However, apart from the short-range forces a r i s ing from
the core-core interactions, it i s a k o found tha t the long
range forces of
const i tute part
coulomb interaeilon of the form
of the core-core interactions. But i n a c rys ta l
many sets of neighbcurs interact s ignif icant ly . Therefore, we
need t o sum over many l a t t i c e s e t s t o get t he analogy of
the summatioLi
t o converge.
For t h i s reason, in dealing with any .:.:ong range potent ia l ,
it i s advantageous t o go over t o the reciprocal l a t t i c e space
by taking a Fourier tramform of the potent ia l viz:
The coulombic contribution t o the dynamical matrix can be t ,< .,*. >. * ,*
expressed i n tPe fbrm
Nuni.ericd values of th iv contribution w i l l be displayed i n
cha$ter 5 fo r vanadium, niobium and tantalum.
2.4 ELECTROWPI,. il 'ON INTERCICTION
In the previous section, we have accounted f o r t he short
range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) forces ar is ing from the overlap of core
wave functions and the long range (coulombic potent ia ls) due
t o ion-ion interaction. In t h i s section, we proceed t o
describe how the electronic band s t ructure contribution
involves the screening action of t he gas of conduction
electrons tLrough the electron-phonon interaction matrix
elements s,X' The electron-phonon interaction is essent ia l ly m a m i c a l
as revealed most s t r ikingly i n superconduct ing s ta tes . Also,
t he theory of the electron-phonon interaction, which is an
inport at element underlying many phenomena i n so l id s t a t e
physics, has a direct t e s t in the calculation of t he frequencies
of l a t t i c e vibrations i n metals. The study of t he ion-ion
interaction via the electrons requires the solution of the
many-electron Schrodfng'W edfiation. We consider a model of
essent ia l ly independent e l ec t rms influencing each other only
through a se l f consistent f i e l d which includes the Hartree
potential and a screened exohan& potential . Although the
effect ive interaction between two electrons, v~(; , ;~), which
occurs in the exchange term, i s known t o a f a i r degree of
sophistication, for convenience we s h a l l use the simple
"'" 36
Thomas-Fermi apyroximat ion. Its Fourier t ransfom i s
where k i s t he Thomas-Fermi screening parameter. S
As we are only interested in t h e term i n t he t o t a l energy
of second order i n the ionic displacements, we sha l l
perturbation expnsion in u of t he form R
use a
where
is the ionic displacement. However, it seems reasonable
t ha t the charge dis t r ibut ion of t h e con2uction electrons
within an ion core follows the ion without much change of
i ts shape and, therefore, it would not be r e a l i s t i c t o expand
a a a
t he t r u e wave function Q;(r,x) i n powers of uQ. We s h a l l
apply t h e perturbation theory t o t he redis t r ibut ion of t he
conduction electrons outside t h e core region, which concerns * * , . L , E . ?' * .,>
the smooth par t @;i;(r-x) ra ther Lhm t he t rue wave function. A
We simply t r e a t @;(r,x) as the wave function under the influence A
of the weak pseudopotentids ~ ( z - x ~ ) i n place of t he bore ion
potent ia ls ub(;GR) employing-t6e f a c t t h a t U is nonlocal, and
{$(;;) 1 cannot be exactly an orthonormal s e t , and t h a t
there should be a f rac t iona l fac tor i n t he density function,
because part of the charge has been taken out.
We can now expand e v e q quantity in powers of the a
ionic displacements u and denote the order of each term by e a superscript, omitting the zeroth order one. The f i r s t order
change, , H 1 T of the pseudo-Hamiltonian which .= includes the pseudo 20-tential and self-consistent f i e l d can
be interpreted as the effect ive elec+,ron-phonon scat ter ing
amplitude wil;l~in the framework of the Born-Oppenheimer method.
* It s a t i s f i e s an integral equation which i s discussed in some
de ta i l in e review a r t i c l e by Sham and Ziman (1963).
In the Eartree approximation, the solution is simply
a l i nea r screening of t he bare scat ter ing potential . The
screening matrix is given by
f o r all reciprocal l a t t i c e vectors and i' where
a -5
~ ( k ) bning the single electron energy and n(k) the occupation
number. Eq. (2.43) i s the same as what is vsually known as
the s t a t j c dielec-tYic d c t i o h i n the random phase approximat-
ion. However, the former rea l ly modifies the change of t he
ionic poJ~cnt ia l :-ather than the interaction between two point
charges, and exchange and correlation efrecta come i n t o play
different ly i n t he two cases.
Thus, we aim a t obtaining a solution neglecting the 2
k-dependence effect produced by tke exchange term. The exchange
term of Hubbard (1958) involves the replacement of t h e matrix 2 A
element vS (k--k) cP t he screened coalornb interaction, which 4 -L -L
sca t tc res k and c. in to k t end k t respectively, by
where i s some average of t h e F e d vector.
Our app-oximate solution w i l l then be of the same f o m in
the Hartree apgruxfmation, modieing only the coulomb inter- a A
action v(q+e) between two electrons in t he second t e r n on the
-L L ') a A
a - f(q+g) = 1 - 4 &It -- - * 2 2 2 (2.45) ( q + d +kF+kS
A .A
which tends t o one half f o r l a rge q + g. This upholds the
reasonable physical pj.cture t ha t t he short range par t of t he < ( < . * C . i *
inlerzcticm between ~ S . C Z ~ . T _ ' : I ~ ~ R c,f p r a l l e l spins is reduced by
the exclusion principle,,
The second order term of t h e t o t a l energy is eas i ly 1 - ..
shorn t o be
39 a
where V is t h e sum over all l a t t i c e vectors a of the pseudo- a a
potent ia ls u(r ,xa). The f i r s t term on the r igh t hand s ide is
due t o repeated one-phonon processes i n which a phonon is
annihilated producing an electron hole p ~ i r which recombines
emitting another ~'nonon. Before the enission of the second
phonon, the electron ~ i l d the hole are subjected t o the influence
of other electrons. The second term is due t o i n t r i n s i c two-
phonon processes i n vhfch an electron in t e r e s t s simultaneously
with two phono~s.
(1) By m c m z of our approximate solution f o r <4-., IH 142 , k
we can get tile atc.!ond order term of the t o t a l energy i n t he form
J2)(;) = ; Z U U P E@ . xl(;) -qr, qs' qs qs (2.47)
qss'
with t h e electronic contribution
-5
o(-~) being the F ~ u r i e ~ transform of the electron density. Each
t e r n j.n %h,? c o n t r i b u t i m ~ ~ & f e ~ W t h b repeated one-phonon
scattering pi-xesses is given ty
Hence, t h e electronic contribution can be writ ten i n t h e form
40 ; -
a A & -. .A
where w ~ ~ ( ~ , ~ ' ) is defined as the limit as q + 0 of waB(q+g,q+ge) A
except tihat when g = 0 , it is zero.
But the most general form of the electronic contribution
appropriate fo r a nonlocal pseudo- or model potential as given
by Hanke (1973asb) i s of the form
where the prime over the summation sign i n the second t e w implies
t ha t the t e r n (c = ;* = 0 ) ehould be excluded from the sumnation.
2 2 4 Ir. t h i s expressicn, o = ( h z e /MQ,) is the ion plasma P
frequency, M being the r ~ . a s , z the chemical valence and a the -.a - \ *
volume of the atom; ~(a .+g , q+gl) i e the normalized 0(0,0) = 1
energy-~?&ve-number characteristic metrix.
The chwacter is t ics t ,, ..(. of >. % The wave-vector dependent d ie lec t r ic
A f'unctbr. E l q + g, q + g' ) gci: CL! the electronic structure of
most crystrrl!.ine solids and can often be direct ly related t o
many experimentally observed que~nt.itias. Speci*ically, the 1 " _ .I
die lec t r ic j'cnction govzms tBke e lec t rmic contribution t o
the dyn&micalrnatrix, which determines the phonon spectrum.
The l a t t i c e i n s t a b i l i t i e s caused, for instance, by phonon
softening, charge density waves and spin density waves a re
presumably a l so related t o the sharp s t ructure observed i n the
d ie lec t r ic function or the closely related suscept ibi l i ty A 2. 3
function. The sitlgularity in c(q,q) a t q = 2% also play an
important rolc i n determining the Kbhn arlomalies in t h e phonon
spectrum of metals.
Nozieres and Pincs (1958), Ehrenreich and Cohen (1959)
were t:ie f i r s t t o d e r i v ~ expl ic i t expressions f o r the diagona3
component of the d ie lec t r ic matrix within the RDA. But t h e i r
treatment fa i led t o inclucie tke loca l 2icld corrections.
In t h i s section we p-mceed t o show t h a t the off-diazonal
component of d ie lec t r ic matrix ar is ing fmm the electronic
contribution t o the dynadcal matrix i s incorporated i n the
loca l f i e l d correction of d-band m e t a l s which we sha l l invoke
i n the next chapter. We have shom i n Eq. (2.51) t h a t t he
energyrave-ntanber.c&reuz0eristic matrix is absorbed i n the
electronic contribution and can be expressed in the form as given
by Hanke (19731,
where
(2.53)
n ( c ) being the occupation number of t he Bloch s t a t e Qi; with a
energy ~ ( k ) ; nnd
v(;++) = (4~e~/1:+;1~) l.-f(;+i) (2.54)
i s the Fourier transform of t he electron-electron interact ion
with modification f o r exchange and correla t ion b u i l t i n A A
through the frzc-i; ~ . - f ( ~ b - ~ ) . Consequently, Sham and Ziman (1963)
have shown t h a t Eq. (2.52) corresponds t o using t he exact
expression f o r t he
In order t o handle
d i e l ec t r i c matrix i n the RPA,
A d a.
x ; ti + 9. q + g v ) (2.55)
t he energy-wave-number charac te r i s t i c
conveniently, it has been reduced t o the standard expression c ,< . ,6. \.' , 1.r
currently used i n t he l i t e r a t u r e (see f o r example Hanke 1973)
and is of t h e form
where
i s the generalized suscept ibi l i ty matrix. 2 . a A A
We wisl- now t o transform the na t r ix element. %e"(q+g, q+g' )
ar-ising from t he d ie lec t r ic matrix of Eq. (2.55). Ey vi r tue of A
Bloch's themem i n the form $->fr) = e iL rt k I$;), we may write
A d a
e i (q+g*) . r @i = $+i+gt , so tha t
wnere we hwe used the fec t t h a t 3V /aE has the same properties M 2 as the projection operator (P = Ca(a> "1 = p ) of OPW pseudo- -
. p o t e n t i d theory so tha t formally ( l - ) ~ ~ / a ~ ) ' = 1-aVM/aE. .a
By transforming <$cle - i k ~ + g ) ~ r A d > I ~ k + ~ + g " s imilarly , and
subst i tut ing in Eq. (2.53) we f ind
Because
A27 A ,
we f ind tha t when we subs t i tu te f o r -,,(q+g, q+gf ) i n eq. (2.55) 2-
%g
and perform t.he summation over g", the l a s t -)rm i n Eq. (2.59)
may be replaced by
Sclkt i tut ing Eqn. (5.59) i n Eq. (2.55) we get the r e su l t
A -\
€*(q+g) bcmg tlia Lindimt! i ' i e l e ~ t r i c function. Zq. (2.61) A 2 & . A
ascer ta iw t.1hn-l; off-diegnn~.l psrt of c(q+g, q+gf) i s determined
c o r ~ l e t e l y by the depletion hole associated with the nonlocal
model potential V Row the correction t o the Linhard M'
expression due to the c?n-,lelion hols takes the form
In the simple metal qgG~.& ,potent ia l (sMMP) theory, the off- < , (
diagonal part of t h i s contribution i s t reated as s m a l l . while
t he diagonal part i s a3sclrbed i n the Lindhard expression A 2 .A .a
E , ( ~ + ~ ) by renormalizing the e l ec t r i c charge i n v(q+g), I ' 1 .I
through the substi tution
where
i s ?he magni-tude of the orthogonslization or depletion charge
which w e s h a l l dorive in chapter 4. Iil the m7'P theory, we
intend t o show t h a t the contribution of the d i e l ec t r i c matrix
to t he electronic corltribution does not cancel out (by symmetry)
f o r t h e transverse branches of the phonon spectrum of bcc crystals
as indicated by O l i and A n i d u (1976). This w i l l be shown
i n chapter 5.
f n t h e previous chapter, we have presented t h e mathematical
t o o l s f o r t h e l a t t i c e &~nwnics of d-band n e t a l s based on t h e
ad iaba t i c and harmonic ap~roximst ions . 1,Je hrzve a l s o described
t h e i n t e r s t o n i c forces a r i s i n q from ( a ) t h e d i r e c t coulomb
in te rac t ion between bare ions of 1 o n : ~ r a n y e nsture; ( b ) t h e
core-c?re exchange force due t o overlan betveen core wave
f'unctions centered on neighbourins ions of" short-ranee nature;
and ( c ) t h e i n d i r e c t in te rac t ion between ions v i a t h e
~ o l a r i s a t i o n f i e l d of t h e valence e lec t ron pas which depends on
t h e d i e l e c t r i c constant of t h e e lec t ron m s .
In t h i s c h a ~ t e r , we s h a l l inves t i ea te t h e contribution
t o ( c ) a r i s i n p from s-d in terac t ion. %is % r i l l be determined
by two methods, f",xs$l;vs. .,$he rec in roca l l a t t i c e method based
on p s e u d o p t e n t i a l s an6 yeudowave h c t i o n s and secondly, a
d i r e c t method usin? ac tua l a,tonic po ten t i a l s and charge densi t ies .
A s a ?relude, we s h a l l i n sec. 3.2 consider t h e >seudo- 1, " ..
- tent ial a p ~ r o a c h b:r i .nves t iv . t ing t h e d i ~ r o n a l nart of t h e 4 d
t o t a l in te rac t ion enerpr (?( F '. .. . ,nbT) ar i s i a tm Prom t h e screen in^ 1 ' -.
of t h e e l e c t r i c char{:e deasFty and electron-ion i n t e r a c t i o n
yo ten t i a l . "his v i l l enable us t o show how t h e d i e l e c t r i c
constant of the electron gas is called in to play, and the
circumstances under which ~ ( q , . . . ,%) represents a short-
range interatomic potential . In sec. 3.3, we ehal l investigate
the contribution f r o m local f i e l d correction by using the
reciprocal l a t t i c e method based on pseudopotentials and
pseudowave functions.
In order t o deal with the d i rec t method of using actual
atomic potent ia ls and charge densit ies, w e sha l l i n sec. 3.4
investigate the contribution from s-d interaction by considering
the following expression fo r the t o t a l electronic band s t ructure
energy i n a fixed configuration of the ions:
where V (G) is the potent ia l energy experience by an electron n
i n the nth band and p , (;) the electron density due t o the n
charge dist r ibut ion of e l e ~ i x m i in the n t th band. The contri-
bution from s-d hybridiztiLion w i l l be represented from t h i s
point of view by O (E . . . .%). We shal l show tha t i n a sd , &'. .'. ... .
certain approximation which w i l l be specified, 4 may be sd
represented by a short-range potential of t he Born-Mayer type.
As CL prelude, we proceed i n t h i s section t o consider
the diagonal part of the t o t s 1 interaction energy ar is ing from
the screening of the e l ec t r i c charge density and electron-ion
interaction potential . We write the t o t d interact ion in
the form (Animalu 1977a p. 7 3 ) *
- a
where p i ) is the electronic charge density a t r - Ri, 4 a
where V'( r R . ) i s the electron-ion interaction potent ia l a t J - A
r - R . The f i r s t term in Eq. (3.2) represents the d i rec t
coulomb interaction between ions, while the second term
represents the screening.
The bare interaction derived from ordinary coulomb
interact ion between an electron a t and a point ion a t takes
the form
Essentially, the physical idea associated with screening
by the valance electron gas is tha t i f s i s the d i e l ec t r i c
constant of the electron gas, then, the above p o t e n t i d is
modified t o the form 13
as i s c lass ica l e lectrosta t ics .
Considering the screening of the bare electron-ion 1 ..
potent ia l V by the d ie lec t r ic constant of the valence s C
electron gas, wc suppme t h a t the effect ive (screened)
potent icl ta.lces Lht! form
where, from c lass ica l e lec t ros ta t ics , t he screening po ten t ia l s A. -<
VSC rc la ted t o the density p(r-R) of t h e valence electrons
by Poisson's equation:
V'V- ac - ) = - 4ne26p(;-5)
dp(P5) being l;he change i n the electron density above 3r
below i t s mean value i n the crysta l . Such f luctuat ions i n
the l oca l electron density is due t o electron-electron
interact ions among the mobile valence electrons. But from the
point of view of qumtuin mechanics, we know t h a t p is the
p roba t i l i t y density function, a L A A
P ( ~ - R ) = 26 $FR)+~(=) k
where i n turn t h e electron wave flmction 9; is determined
by the solution of t he Schrodinger equation
.A 4
Here, we assume tha t the electrjn-ion potent ia l ~ ( r - R ) is
wea!c and we can t r e a t the above wave equation by perturbation
i &.- .- The Fourier transform of ~ ( P I ? ) is of t he form
If we subs t i tu te f o r $JR* and Jr i n th i s exproasion and r e t a in k k
t ~ m s of srder V a t most, then it i s readily seen t h a t .-. A
i verf(P) TffW &) 2 I 1 -
L? T j ; - T - A T- - T-' A - 1 (3.11) k I--. k+q k k-q -.
i:
(-q), t h i s reduces t o
where
Because we how p(;), t he Poisson equation (3.6) now gives an i
e w t i o n connecting V 9c (z) and p( q) ; viz ,
= 2K@1a0 defines t he Thomas-Fermi screening length,
And on eliminating vsC( ;) between t h i s and Eq. (3 .5) .
we f ind t he f i n a l re la t ion
where .A X2
4 9 ) = 1 + -- 2 x ( d 2 V 9
is the dielectr.Jc con:jtan-t of the f ree electron gas.
Typicdly, 57 i;he I'homas Fermi approximation (x=l) , t he
screened elec?;;.on-ion interact ion potent ia l has t he short-range 2 2. 2 -L -*
form (-e /I r-RI )exp( -XI ) , a t a separation ( ~ R I between
an electron and a pos i t ive ion, and
isterac.tLm is gi-ren by
where
the screcncd ion-ion
A e 2e 2 X2 $(R) = -- ... - s i n qR H K 2 4R dg (3.21)
0 q +x2
Crcrlshteyn and Pychi.k (3.465 g. 408) have shown in the Table c $ 3 . * 6 >. , * >+
of Ir~LegraLc that
Therefore, FA. (3.23.) tskhs thz final form
Thus
We observe t h a t t h e diagonal part of the screened ion-ion
in terect ion po ten t ia l i s represented by t'ne Yulrawa short-range
interatomic potent ia l .
3.3 CONTRIBUTION FROM I D C A L FIELD CORRECTION
We proceed t o show the contribution from the l o c a l f i e l d
correct ion i n the framework of t h e rec iprocal l a t t i c e method by
using t he i;s cudopotent i a l s and pseuclowave functions. This
approach w i l l require Fourier inversion of t he off-diagonal
part; of the e lect ronic contribution t o t h e 4vnamical matr ix in
t ? ~ transition-rnetnl model po ten t ia l (T-W) approximation.
Rn='-ally, we ,Ire t o determine t h e interatomic po ten t ia l @
by Fourier inversion of an expression l i k e Eq. (3.19), but with
G ( < ) replaced by a matrix of t he form
is t he generalized suscep t ib i l i ty matrix. Here, t h e d i e l e c t r i c
matrix is o f the form
(3.28) where
The inverse d i e l e c t r i c matrix &hated i n Appendix A has t h e form:
The d ie l ec t r i c niatrix E contains a free-electron contribution .A
c 0 ( ~ + ~ ) whl ch 1s diaganal 31 the r e c i p m c d l a t t i c e vectors g and d 2 a. g', m d rn off--diagonal (g # g ' ) par t , which givea r i s e t o the
loca l f i e l d effects i n the d i e l ec t r i c resporse through i t s
dependence on the localized electronic s t a t e s associated with
the pseudopotential projection operator BVM/OE.
Similarly, the energy-wave-number character is t ic G(q+g,q+gV)
associated with the d ie lec t r ic and inverse d ie lec t r ic matrices A d A 9
can be fur ther separated in to a diagonal part Go(q+g, q+g' ) 6- ', . s ,g
which represents the screening of the coulombic contribution and . a&.
an off-diagonal part Ggc(q+g, q+g1) which represents the local.
f i e l d correction, and tends t o cancel o r "screen" the repulsive
short-range contribh%i6nn; ' b p l i c i t l y ,
where
is t h e usual / .qression given by the f'ree-electron (~indhard)
screening theory and
is the contribution from the local f i e ld correction in which VM
is the transi-iion-metal model potential , and aVM/aE characterizes
the deplstfg:; hole whose dependence on enerpy and on core
electron wavefunctions is typically of the Harrison (1969) form
It is th i s dependence on core wavefunctions and the algebraic
sign of the local f i e l d correction tha t make it tend t o cancel
the repulsive short range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) force.
The diagonel component of the inverse dielectric matrix
has t h e coulombic form that provide8 the screening of the l o n g
range ( coulombic) contribution . Similarly, the off-diagonal
component of the inverse dielectr ic matrix which is associated ( < . . % *' , 1> . '
with the local f i e l d cor?ection tend t o cancel o r "screen"
the repulsive short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) potential.
In practice, evaluation of the local f i d d correction
f r o m the reciprocal l a t t i c e &etfiod involves a complicated
t r i p l e s m : ,".I t 7 J Z r RE fnf in i te se t of r e c i p m d . l a t t i c e
vectors ( 0 l i and ~nimalu 1976), and it i s d i f f icul t t o obtain
numerical resul ts consistent w i th the symetry requirements
whenever the sumnatioas are cut off after a f i n i t e number of
reciprocal l a t t i c e vectors i s i-cl nded.
To t h i s end, we sha l l in t h i s thesis adopt a direct method
using a c t u d ?,toxric 2otentials a112 charge densities via s-d
i:l",b:-nctic~~ .to p n r ~ ~ ~ e t e r i z e l o c d field correction as an
attractive short--r-.,nge ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) force, Iiaving the same
functionel fora* i n real space as the Born-Mayer type. This
npproacb. ~ i . 1 1 be shown i n the next section.
3.4 ATEJLCTIVE SHORT-RANGE FORCXS VIA S-9 INTERACTION
We proceed in t h i s sec. t o use the d i rcc t method t o
investigate qualitatively under what circumstances s-d interact-
ion may be represented as a short-rmge potentiedl of Born-
Mayer type.
We shal l begin t h i s investigation by considering the
t o t a l interatomic potential energy of a t ransi t ion metal
containing N transition-metal ions of chemical valence
(% = Zg + zd) and a dietribution of s- and d-electrons with
charge density ( p =, ,pa.<+, P ~ ! whose i n t e r a ~ t i o n with the
positive ions is characterized by an electrowion potential
(V Vs + vd) is given by the expression (see, fo r example
, . = c ( z e ~ * + R. . i> j IJ
i
where R . . = The second term e represents the indirect 1J
ion-ion interaction via t he polarizstion f i e l d of the s- and
d-electrons, and may be rewritten as a sum of two diagonal
parts, and @id and two off-diagonal par ts , @id and @As, as follows:
where
(n,m = s ,d )
Thus, the off-6iagonal par t of the t o t a l energy ar i s ing
from the s-d interaction is of the form
where Ps(ri(i) is the electronic charge density of the a-electron A
b t Ri, while vd(;$ ) is the d-electron interaction potential j
a t 2 This gives the interaction potent ia l between the j
neikhbouring ( i and j atoms due t o an overlap of a f r ee s-
electron wave functfbd4'tif' tge ith aton and a bound o r v i r tua l
bound d-electron wave function of the j t h atom is the l a t t i c e .
Sincz the s-electron is nearly f ree , the charge density
associ&ted with z s-electron off. the ith atom m y be replaced by s
77 - whwe z is the chemical valence of t he s-electrons. Here,
s
Jlks has been approximated as a s.'mple plane wave so t h a t p is s
A
approximately a 6-f'unction centered on the atomic s i t e s Ri.
But f o r t he d-electron, it has the form:
NOW, p determines V via Poisson's equation i n the form d d
whose 20:~.ntion is qudLita.k.ively of t he form * A d
A a pd(rl-I+R.) v ~ ( ~ - R . ) = - 4ae j a
J ;I dr' (3.42)
irt-r + E.1 Then J
I n other wordss 4id is zg times a siqerposition of the atomic-
l i k e d-potentials. For our purposes we sha l l consider the
hydrogenic normalized radial and angular wavefunctions f o r the
3d band of the form ( ~ o l e s and Caplin 19.~6 p. I?'), which takes
the fonn , . > , '
Then 4 4 A I Z3 z r -2zdr/3ai
IJISd(r) i 2 = - . d d ; 4 e 2
(3 cos 0-112 (3.45) 81~x6 1 a:
where zd is the chemical valence of the d-electrons and ai is
the ionic radius.
Then Eq. (3.43) takes the form
A
where R = IRi-R i j
By subst i tut ing Eq. (3.45) i n to Eq. (3.461, we get
3 b ' 2 1 Z d "d O0 3 -2zdr/3ai 1
=.- 4ve -- . - mi -Ti Zs f r e drf ( 32 -112d2 . 31~x6 'i R. . -1
1J
But
Then Eq* (3.47) takes the form
I n t ~ g r a t i n g the above integral by par t s by using the re la t ion
j udt. - -? ,> - fvdu ,' ... (3.50) -2zdr/3ai
and nubstitc;.i,lg 1:=r3 an6 v = e , we get
--2zdr/3a. o Q) -2zdr/3ni 1 00 -2zdr/3ai -
f r e r e di. = 1 - 3 1 r e d r
2zdr R . . 22 r Rij d ( - - 1 1~ d R i j q- -1
dr 3ai d r 3ai
3ai - -22 R. ./3ai + - 9ai -2zdr/3ai = R e d 1 j
2zd 1 J r 3 e a; (3.51) 22d R .
lj Then
-22 r/3a. rn
9ai 2 .-?z r/3ai a; = 9ai r 2 e d 18ai - -
-1 r e d 2zdr 22d Rij *zd d (- - R.. 1 J
22d dr 3ai
2 27ai -2zdr/3ai =
t-- 54a: Q) -22 r/3ai
2 r e I + - 2 I re & d
4zd R.. 1 J bzd R . . 1 J
Px the r integration gives
3 l&ai -22 R. ./3a. 162a 3 OD -2zdr/3ai - - - ti.. 1. d 1 ~ 1, 1 e dr
82; lJ 8za 3 R~~ d 2 zdr -4- -) dr 3ai
3 162ai ., -22 R. . /3si 486ai 4 -2zdRi j/3c: d 1J = -- In. . l e
87,; IJ + 7 16zd
Cmbining Eqs. (3.51) - (3.53), we get
Of pMt~.cular intc,rgr;t6.ta.us i n t h i s thes i s is the f i r s t (zeroth 2
order) term i n powers of (R. . I which is of the Born-Mayer 1J
type, i.e.
A.
electron interaction pottxb?.al i n t h e f i r l d of an ion a t R . in J
the form
Thus, contribution t o the interatomic force due t o s-d
which is seen t o be an at t rac t ive Born-Mayer type potential ,
B a ~ l b .',' b : k ~ g the pert inec-t Born-Meyer coefficients defined
3 It i s remarkhble tha t , if we t r e a t the 3d electronic
s ta tes as virtual. bound in
Enhr radius of the v i r tua l
2 t h ~ z the atomic 4s . s t a t e ,
the solid, with the effective
bound 3d electronic she l l larger
then the effective nuclear charge
seen by :he v i r tua l bound 36 electrons w i l l be zd = 3, and
-10 -8 r - . - u 5 t n i n ( w i t h e = 4 . 8 ~ 1 0 esu; z m = 2 ; a i = 0 . 5 9 x 1 0 cm ( 3 4 \. 5
-8 -8 for vanadium, 0.69 x 10 cm for niobilzm and 0.68 x 10 cm
f o r taltalum east 1975)) tiie numerical values of the Born-
Mayer coefficients B and y which are displayed i n tab le 3.1, - ..
TABLE 3.1
ATTRACPIVE BORN-MEIYER COEFFICIETJTS
Metal Ionic Radii Born-Mayer Born-Mayer Coeff. (E) Coeff. (y)
Apart from the sign, these are of the same order of magnitude
8s the Born-Mayer parameters obtained empirically by Huntington
We now have a theory which can be used as a basis t o
explain the or igin of t he Born-Mayer potent ia l from the f i r s t
principle. We s h a l l use t h i s Born-Mayer (short-range) force t o
obtain local f i e l d corrections for the d-band metals vanadium,
niobium and tantalum. I n chapter 5 , our numerical r e su l t s c ,< 4 ,* >. 5
obtained by the use of short-range force w i l l . 3e compared
with the numerical resdt . ; evaluated by tile reciprocal l a t t i c e
method by O l i and Anim~lu (1936)for vanadium. Nevertheless,
we sha l l s-i ' ...I. use the ~r&si$on-~etal-~odel-potent ial ( W)
t o evaluate the r e s t of the contributions t o the phonon
frequencies which include the coulombic and electronic
contributions which we sha l l display in chapter 5.
S-D HYBRIDIZATION IN ENERGY BlWD AND MODEZ POTENTIAL I N d-BAND
4.1 INTRODUCTION
In the previous chapter, we have investigated the contri-
bution tc; -the indirect interaction between ions via the
polarization f i e l d of the valence electron gas. This enabled
us t o show tha t the.diagonal part of the screened electron-ion
and screened ion-ion interaction potent ia ls are ~epresented by
the Yuknwa short-range interatomic potential . In our detailed
derivation, we have investigated the contribution from the
locd- f i e l d correction in the framework of the reciprocel
l a t t i c e method by using the pseudopotentials and $seudowaVe
functions. I n t h i s approach, w e have shown tha t the pseudo-
potent ia l method i s use6 t o evaluate the off-diagonal component
of the inverse d ie lec t r ic roatrix which is associated with the . ,< . 6 +' , 14
loca l f i e l d correction, !lowever, t he complexi5y of the pseudo-
potent ia l approach i;i The computational analysis of the loca l
f i e l d correction demands an a l ternat ive technique. Thus, we
have parameterized loca l ' f idid correction associated with s-d
interaction as a short-rslge foroe having the same -functional
form i n real space as the '.<Jim-Mayer potential . Nevertheless,
our numerical calculations of the various contributions t o
the phonon frequencies w i l l s t i l l require pseudopotential approach.
ti4
To t h i s end, we proceed i n th i s c.h.$c~ t ~ t aeacribe how t h e
s-d hybridization i n energy band and model potent ia l i n d-band
metals a re used t o obtain numer ic~l r e su l t s i n the computation
of the phonon frequencies.
In order t o achieve our objectives, we s h a l l begin in sec.
4.2 by dzscribj-ug the s-d hybridimtion in Energy band by which
i s meant tP.3% a nearly f ree electron broad s-band crosses and
hybridizes with a tight-binding narrow d-band. In sec. 4.3, we
s h a l l show how s-d hybridization a r i ses fmm a resonance
interaction with = 2 component of the plane waves. I n
section 4.4, we s h a l l display the generalization of t h e O W -
pseudopotential transformation t o the &-band metals, This
w i l l enable ue t o appreciate t he fonnal s t ructure of the model
potent ia l fo r d-band metals in section 4.5. In section 4.6,
we s h a l l carefully derive the magnitude of t he okthogonali-
s a t ion o r depletion charge.
In order t o zmsetlc ps idopo ten t i a l o r motiel p o t e n t i 4
derived from the ene rg band theory f o r t he investigation of
electron-phonon interaction and other electron scat ter ing
processes, we shall introduce.:the T-matrix which is necessary
t o eliminate divergences from sca t te r ing off singular potentials.
Consequently, the T-matrix 3.s regular and well-behaved, whereas
the V-matrix is divergent. The formulation i n t he past reveal
t he s imi la r i ty of T-matrix and V-matrix i n t he Born approximation.
We wish t o show t h ~ t t h i s approxh&tioa is inadequate f o r the
d-band metals due t o the presence of the strong scat ter ing
resonances associated with the s-d kvbridization which is a
relevant feature of d-band metal electronic band structure.
In section 4.7, we sha l l carefully derive the theory of T-
matrix sc:.zttering in order t o es tabl ish an in tegra l equation
fo r t h e t r u t s i t i o n operator T. In section 4.8, we shal l
carefully determine the T-matrix form factor ~ ( q ) i n te rns of
the V-matrix form factor v(~). And in Sec. 4.9, t he v i r tua l
bound s t a t e problem w i l l be treated.
4.2 S-D HYBRIDIZATION I N ENERGY BAND OF TRANSITION METALS
In t h i s section we proceed t o deal with the occurrence of
s-d hybridization, by which is meant tha t a nearly free
electron broad s-band crosses and hybridizes with a t ight-
binding narmw 13-band. I n r ea l i t y the atomic 8-state is 5-fold
degenertxte but is s p l i t ii: a cubic crystal by t3e c rys ta l Field
in to two sub-beds, one. sr' ),,baing 3-fold degenerate and the c , P'J
other ( r ) being 2-fold asgclarate a t the ~ymmetry point r. 12
In order t o analyse s-d hybridization, the complex d-band may
be represented by a single l i n e crossing a parabolic s-band. 0 ., ..
For exmple, on considering the 3d transit ion-series metals,
t he broad 4s b a d approximated by a parabola is crossing and
interscting with the narrow 3d bands, and the simplified
(nm-interacting band) picture of energy bmds and the s-d
hybridization of vanadium are shoK.z i n Fig. 4.1.
Mathematically, s-d hybridizat ion i s incorporated i n energy
band theory through a sectilai: equation of the form
where 14 m d bCdd represent t he matrix elements of the s and S G
d banas respectively, while Ms-d and Md-s separately denote
the matrix element of the interaction.
The secular equation a r i s ing f r o m the enargy band theory
involves a one-electron Schrodinger equation
I
which t e l l s bow the % e r n 2 electron waves propagate inside
the crystal having the periodicity of the c rys ta l potent ia l
v(:) = v(; + ?) (4.2a) -.
where the vectors 2 aenote the app3-opriate l a t t i c e ~eCt0 rS of
the crys+.al, i, e.
and el' C2, !13 - l .ntr-~rs: R I ng, ag are l a t t i c e constants
(vectors ) ,
The nature of the eigenmlues Ei;: and eigenf'unctions $; 0 - .-
obtained from the solution of Eq, (3.1) fo r v ~ T ) = 0 (empty
l a t t i c e ) can be represented i n a number of ways since E; is 9
periodic in k i. e.
Non- interacting .
8 IL d bands Intoracting a hybridized
. s d bandr for vanadium
where g is a reciprocal l a t t i c e vector. We mag- represent Bi; r s A k (fig. 4.2) i n reduced zone scheme (as a multiple periodic
function) o r i n extended zone scheme (as an ordinary non-periodic
function). These are i l l u s t r a t ed i n the f r e e electron case
below where
By fo;: s i n g at tent ion on constant energy surfaces i n 3 dimensions,
we can rewrite Eq.
which is a sphere.
Fermi surface
(4.4) i n the form
But the surface of greatest interest is the
where $ = (3n2p)lI3, p being the electron density of fwe e l e c t h n .
In the context of onee lec t ron energy-band secular equ8tion
various ap~\maches ?,re used t o handle Eq. (4.1). Slater (1937)
first suggested the Augmented Plane Wave (APW) method by using
a potential that i s sphericalJy symmetrical &.ht each s r t d c ,<. . .<. ,7' 3 *
s i t e i n each atomi'.~ p?l.I. and constant i n the rest of t h e wit
cel l . Herring (1940) introduced the Orthogonalized Plane
Wave (oPW) method. Later Korrinp (19471, Kohn and Rest - , ) _ ..
(1954 ) used the Kbrringa-Kohn-Rostbker ( 5 ~ 5 ~ ) nethod otheruis.e
known as the Green's f'unction method. Finally, Phi l l ips and
Kle.inman (1.959) E-Iarrison (19631, Animalu and Heine (1965)
developed the pseodupotential method where the valence electron
Ra4uo.d Zona Scheme
I I
, ,, . .*. \:' ,
Fig. 4.2 (b)
Ext endad Zone Schema
appears t o see only a net weak pwbentjal. The efPective
electron wave M c t i o n corresponding t o the replacement of
the t rue potent ia l by the pseudopotential i n the t r u e
Schrodinger equation does not have all the rapid osc i l l a t ions
of the t r u e wave function but ra ther a pseudawave wave
function $.
h ' w our purpose, we s h a l l employ the APW method i n t he
t r a n s i t i ~ n metals involving the crossing of t he nearly-free-
electron (NFE) s-band and the tight-binding +band complex.
7 2 ~ - s e c u h r e q u ~ t i o n f o r one-electron eneriy ban& in t h e A P W
method (hucks 1967) ( i n uni ts such t h a t h = 2m = 1) is of
the. form
1 -- 7 4
where the AmJ pseudopotentoal form factor is defined fo r -. -1
arb i t ra ry s t a t e s , k and k t by
In these equat,ions, U ~ ( R . E ) and u~(R,E) = (duQ/dr) are,
respectively, t h e rad ia l w a v e &&ion and its d e r i v ~ t i v e
(evaluated a t r = R ) ; jQ is the spherical Bessel Punction;
PP( cos 8j;i(, ) is the Legendre's polynomial with argument 4
COS 0 4 kk' ' where 8-- i s the angle between k and E'; R is kk'
the radius of the muffin-tin potent ia l i n t he crysta l ; and Ro
is the unit c e l l volume, for a mvnoatomic crystal l a t t i ce .
The actual l a t t i c e potential appears implicit ly i n the
secular equation through the logarithmic derivative of the
radial wave b c t i o n determined by the radial-wave equation.
where v(;) is the muffin-tin potent ia l associated with a s ingle
l a t t i c e s l t e i n the crystal . By matching UE t o the corresponding
free-space wave outside each muffin-tin sphere, t he effect of
V :.# n hr simulated thmngh the ~ h . a e e s h i f t s (Ie G*,(E) defined
by the standard relat ion
where u2 = E, and je, ne are respectively, t he spherical Bessel
and N e m ~ n n ilmctions, w i t h derivatives, ~;(KR) = d,jQ/dr and
n i ( u ~ ) = dne/dr evaluated a t r = R.
Now, i n an "empty la t t ice" , a l l phase s h i f t s must vanish. ( 4 xi. " l I+.
Hosrever, we observe tha t making a l l Ga = 0 does not cause all
coefficients
t o vanish. If we make use of t he relat ion
then it may be ver i f ied tha t
where
cot Gi = cot G , - n e ( ~ I ? ) / j Q ( k ~ ) (4.14)
Consequently, i f we define the KKR form fac tor by the relat ion
Fmy = 4 p W - ( p W ) o (4.15)
then Zimm's secular equation ( Z i m 1965) f o r the KKR method
becomes
\-. . - .-I
i n whi ck
For R = 2, Z i m m (1965) noted tha t the tight-binding character
of t he or iginal atomic d s t a t e is preserved i n the c rys ta l and
postulated a d s t a t e resonant with a plane wave band. He noted
tha t , i n general, the phase s h i f t i n t he neighbourhood of such , , , . . I .<. . . I + ' .
a resonance behaves l i k e
tan G~ =aW E ~ - E
where En is t he energy of t he resonance and W is the width (i.e. I ' _ .I
t he reciprocal of t he decay life-time of t he s t a t e ) which depends
on the distance of Ed above the energy zero.
The implication of t h i s f ac t on the band s t ructure can be
demonstrated by considering a s ingle plane wave affected by only
73
the d-wave phase shiff; of this type. Nobr k = 0, we may
assume t h a t only one plane wave i s needed so tha t only the term d
with g, = &, = 0 appears in the secular determinant. Then
we f ind
By v i r tue of Eq.
G; =
where Ed, i s the
Subst i t u t i n ~ Eq.
(4.14), we may also write G; i n the form
point where Gi goes through n/2.
(4.20) into ( 4 . l9 ) and remrmging we get
1 where yaw defines a "hybridization gap" giving the degeneracy
resolved by s p l i t t i n g which occurs. i n E vs k re la t ion at the
poink where a very nsrrow d-band crosses the free-electron s
band. The d-band width ( A ) is given i n t h i s simple model by
the enerm difference ..$. +. . . ,z a
where Eo is the energy et which U' /U = 0. Typically, A is of
order 2y. Detailed theory by Lirna~u (1974) reveals t ha t i n the
t rans i t ion metal se r ies , A should depend l inear ly on the square
of the chemical v ~ l e n c e ( 2 ) of the transit ion-metal ions along
a row of the periodic table.
The attempt, by Prasad, Auluck and J3~uY. i (1.976) t o include
s-d hybridization in t he formil.ation of the d i e l ec t r i c screening
has the drawback t h a t only the diagonal contributions are
considered.
Mathematically, s-d hybridization i s incorporated i n
d i e l ec t r i c matrix through a secular equation of t he form
u k t= # - and E r e p r ~ s e n t 'the Intrabmd r w , ' ributions t o the I, s dd
dielee? r 2c m t r i x of tke s er,d d bands respectively, while
E ~ - ~ and E ~ - ~ ~fpfir9t~1.I.j)- (Im.-.l'e the interband contributions t o
the d i e l ec t r i c na t r ix of the interaction. The intraband
contribution involves t he unf i l l ed s and d bands. Therefore,
the off-diagonal csntributi.on t o t he dynamical matrix which
involves the local. f ie ld correcticns a r i ses f r o m t he d-s
intraband contrfiution t o the d ie l ec t r i c matrix. In t h i s
t hes i s , ve shall. Sn?l\5:8;e"t'he loca l f i e l d correction through the
off-diagom,!. c rn t r ibu t icns i n t he fornulation of the d i e l ec t r i c
screening vhich w i l l . ini-3lv e the inverse d i e l ec t r i c matrix
This folmii'ii~n w i l l be treated.& d e t a i l i n section 5.2.
4 . 3 ---- RESrOUKiCZ MODEL23 13-BAND METALS
In the pre-rlons nscl ion, we have sham t h a t t he a-d hybridi-
zation 1~ifC;s the degeneracy i n the eigenvalues of the s and d
bands of approximate symmetry at the point where t h e s and d
bands would i n t e r s ec t i n t h e absence of s-d in teract ion. In
t h i s section, we proceed t o point out how Aderson and McMillan
(1967) emphasized t h a t the hybridization emanates not s o much
from a t r u e s-d in te rac t ion mediated by a non spher ical
symmetrical po ten t ia l , as f'rom a resonance in te rac t ion with t h e
R - 2 com?onent of t he plane waves.
Fr,.--. sca t t e r ing theory, we note t h a t i f t he phase-shift,
Glt, passes through n/2 then t a n Ge would become i n f i n i t e , and
this i ccurs when t he r e is a resonance o r v i r t u a l l e v e l of
rn1.T': in-t in potential : For a t yp i ca l muffin-tin po t en t i a l of
we have 'try matching t h e solutions of t h e r a d i a l wave equation
9 . t I- = %, t h a t t he I.ogarithmic der ivat ive is given by
Put t ing C/B = t an .--
Cot GR 1 = I
I n the as-ymptotic region, tA?n can sxpnfied t o get
Expanding I$&x&(E) i n t he neighlourh~od of E the resonance re
Also, sf .ice &+l+vk(4) = 0, so tha t C t e ( ~ ) passes through
zero near E = Er, we get on subst i tut ing Eq. (4.28) in to Eq.
(4.26) t h a t Er-E
Cot GR = - i 1:
where
Whrn E - Er = f Jw, t he partial cross-section drops t o half i t s
va1-,-I?. Thus $W is the half-w?.d'ih of t he resonance. I n
particular, in t he neigilbou.?';.,cod of a d-state resonance, we
obtain
where E i s the resonancz energy, and W i s the reciprocal of the d
decay life-time of t he s ta te .
me d r a v e phase-shik in the expression (4.31) is of
primery in te res t t o us. 'Ine distingLshing Xeature of t h i s
reuoaance i n sc~t-Ler ing theoxy is tha t t he d s - t ~ t t e s which we were
thinkir.2 of i n t he %inding method as bound s t a t e s a r e
'(7 --
not bound s t a t e s a t dl, rather they are resonances o r v i r tua l
bound s ta tes . Basically, we have t o deal with a problem of
resonance located i n the middle of a f r ee electron band. This
implies t ha t in the standard ~ r ? ~ l f ln-t in approximat ion i n which
there is a f l a t potent ia l common t o the regions f e r from the
&tom, t he 6 - s ta tes turn out to be qui te f a r above t h i s f l a t
l eve l (see f ig . 4 . 3 ) .
4.4 GE3ERA1;IZATION OF THE OPW-PSEUDOPOTENTIAZ, TF?SFOFMATION
the formal s t ructure of
i n the resonance model,
t he model
we proceed
i n t h i s section t o exar ine c~:;.??vlly t he generalization of t h e
OPl+pseudopotential t rmafoimt t ion t o the d-band metals. .
In the simple m?tal theomy, we replace the one-electron
wave equation For a Bloch e k z t r o n i n a crystal ,
by a pseudowave equatiw ,.,,....,.+. . b2 (-zv2 + v om > = > (4 .33)
where VOW is understood t o be weaker than the t r u e potent ia l
V and the pseudowave function $z,, is - @?reral.ly .. a plane wave o r
a simple l i nea r combination of plane waves. The t ran~fonnat ion
t h a t re la tes the t rue Bloch f'unction @ t o t he pseudowave function
d = RESONANCES
Fig, 4 . 3
High - lying rasonon$ 4- 8tatas situated well above t h e .mu&fin-.tin potential.
f o r the class of pseudo potent id.^ and moue1 pwkentials of the
form
where l a >?1; nre the ion-core states. For, i f we tske the
pa r t i a l derivative of V with respect t o %, end subst i tute ow for aV,,/aP i n Eq. (14.34) we obtain the standard resul t , k
where
P = c l c > c cl (4.37) C I.
is the projection operhtor. [-$3" P) tha t orthogonalizes
$g to the ion-core stn;Lx ( c > . Eut i n d-band met-1s i n vh.ir;h +,fie 1 d > s t s t e s are now
complete set including the core s ta tes , the free-Son d s ta tes
Let N(;) be the difference between the true metal potential
then this extra potential appeRrs i n the hybridization
parmeter A defined by
fo r the class of pseudo potent id.^ and model p ~ e n t i a l s of the
form
where I GI > P~ w e the ioi~-.core s tates . For, i f we take the
pa r t i a l derivative of V with respect t o Ei;, end subst i tute om for av,,,,/a~~ k i n Eq. (h.34 ) we obtain the standard resul t ,
where
r . 2 is the projection operntor. :;J = P) tha t orthogonalims
($ t o the ion-core s t t i h ; . ~ lc > . But i n d-band met:-.ls i n ~rb.ich %he I d > s t a t e s are now
virb;ra.:l bound, Hei-risoa expm?f:? tb. ..o vave-Amction i n the o v e r
complete set including the core s ta tes , the free-ion d s ta tes
&a well as plane waves v i z : , t , , , . . t >P > , ' .
Let N(;) be the difference between the true metal potential
then this extra potential appears in the hybridization
parameter A defined by
Put t ing Ec,. (4.36) into Eq. (4.32) we get
To evtr-iuate a and a we multiply Eq. (4.41) on the l e f t by c d'
<c( and <dl respectively provided
and we obtain
I n R typical d-band metal, such as vanadium, c runs through t h e
ls22s22p63e'3p6 while d w s through t h e 3d3; % c h a r a c t a r i s t i z e ~
the ionized be2 free-electron s ta tes ; and A E 6V - <dld~ld> is
the hybridization potent ia l which generates t he d-band resonance
i n t h e energy band structure. Then the corresponding pseudowave
equation turns out t o be
where W is essent ia l ly the um%l 3PW-pseudopotentisl operator:
The s t r ik ing feature o f th i : , lxtension is the resonance o r
-1 bybridiaation term prn-,m*ional t o (E~-E) . To express
qual i ta t ively t he effec~; of t h i s term, we take the expectation
value of t he Schrodinger equation between plane waves t o get
where we have put
I where .\-re heve put
This is a quadratic in E with solution
and when this is plotted producns the gap in energy due to the
coupling of s and d states which is termed hybridization. The
occurrence of this s-d hybridization was demonstrated (see fig. a - 6 . \. ,
4.1) to occur in energr b ~ x h ~f d-bmd metals.
In order to handle the resonance term proportional to
(E~-E)- ' which gives rise to a singularity in energy near E 1 ' .. d'
we shall redefine the transition-metal-pseudopotential ( W)
to include this resonance tern. Thus, the real transition-
met al pseudopotent in].
and
But O i 1 ~ ~ l d Animlu (7-976) have shown tha t it is necessary t o
include the small imaginary part i.e. a resonance width i n order
t o remove the divergence occuring i n t h e pseudopotential. Thus,
and t h t corresponding wavefunction becomes
A Thus the new projection operator P 1 can be s p l i t in to a
simple part (P=) and a resonant p r t (P,) as follow^
and
then, because <dl A1 d, and <dl A1 d> = 0, and it is assumed t h a t A
is nearly constant over the core s t a t e s so tha t < d l ~ l d > = 0,
we have I, 1 .I
Thus
2 -- This i s the basic p r o p r t y (P = ?I j o f 9. val id pseudopo-t;entia,I.
transformation. It is on t h i s conceptual scheme t h a t we must
erect n nodel poteat?~ii . of the Haine-Abarenkov type f o r t h e
d- I l ~ i ~ d metals i n t he nexi; section.
4.5 d-BAND MODEL POTE2TTTAL
Iu this section, we sha l l carefully examine the appropriate
model. -3t.ent.ial lor t he d-band metals. The main feature of
the electronic s t ructure of d-band metals which has t o be
incorporate6 i n t he model potent ia l is the s-d hybridization
as discussed i n t he previous sections of t h i s chapter. Animalu
(1973b), Maclin and Animalu (1977) have shown how 8-d
hybridization may be s i m l a t e d i n t he framework of t he model
potent ia l method, s t a r t i n g fro13 Iiugmented Plane Wave (APW) and
Korringa-Koh-Rostoker--2imzn WCRZ methods of energy band
calculation. The model p t e n t i a l obtained in t h i s way is the
d-band model potentisl . Esscnt iaily , t he &--band model potent ia l , 4 6 ,. ,
has t h e mme form as the Eeine-Abarenkov model potent ia l , but
t he enez-gy-dependence of the R = 2 (resonant) term is qui te
different, being of t h e Corm A & ( E ) ~ ( E ~ - E ) - ~ ¶ near t h e d-band I, _ ..
resonant energy Ed.
The objective of .:-:I? model potent ia l however, is t o
replace the deep core potent ia l a t each ion s i t e i n e metal by
a weak model potent ia l constructed i n such a way t ha t the model
83
wave eq.ueAk3 I c . 4 ~ t o exactly the same eigen-due as the t rue
wave equakion for valence electrons in the m e t a l .
A model p o t e n t l s c m be clloscr i n n yariety of ways. A
simple choice that corresponds t o elimiilating a l l the radial
modes 2n the model wave f'unction, 4, i n the region O<r% so
as t o reproduce the phase s h i f t of the true potential (mod n) , is shown in Fig. 4.4. Outside the radius %, the t rue wave
function iy n.nd the model vave function 4 are identical. This
c h o i ~ l c ~ d s +,o the Heine-Absrenkov model potential ( ~ e i n e
and Abarc~kov 1964, Abarenkov and Hehe 1965, Animalu and
Heine 1965).
The Heir,%-Abarenkov model potential fo r a positive ion of
chemical valence z hes :.he form ( for each fi), i n atomic units,
In t h i s case, t h e m~d&i. radius, %, l i e s between the ion
core radius and the radius J P the sphere inscribed i n a Wigner-
Seitz c e l l for . , tb t .wy&al .lattice of the element, but i s
othervise ar3itraw. Round s ta tes of energy E and angular
momentum P, i n such a potential can be found analytically while
4 and the well-depth,, A ! are determined so as t o r~produca
the atomic spectroseo:~i~ term values of the atom o r ion.
When all mgnls-. .~oaentua s ta tes are taken into account,
the p o t e n t i d for a bare ion has the form
Fig. 4 . 4
Compasjson of the Heine and Aborenkov Model potential UMand the model wove funct ion with
M the t:ue. potential V and trqe y q v e funct ion yr.
where P is a projection operator t ha t ~ C K S ~ 2 - t the componknt E
of t he wave function with angular molilentm II.
The bare ion potent ia l % include uoc which is an
'orthogonalization correction' potent ia l due t o an orthogonaliza-
t i on o r depletion hole a r i s ing from t h e f ac t t ha t 1~1'1 = 1 $ 1 2 does not vanish inside the ion core. In order t o eliminate
the mgnitude of uoc, Heine and Abarenkov suggested tha t one
m y replace the'uniform electron density ze/Ro (z = valence of
ion, no = atomic volune) by a charge density z(l+a)e/Ro
everywhere, a being a correction, together with an extra
posi t ive charge ze/a spread uniformly over a sphere of radius
R equal t o t h a t of the ion core. C
The orthogonalization correction potent ia l then becomes
atomic un i t s )
I ) .> .. where
a eff
= 4(% E ortk.ogonalization charge Ra)
R, is the radius of a sphere of volme Ro. An addition correction
t o . t h e bare ion potent ia l is the so-called correl8tion correction
u described by a p o t e n t i d C C
\
i' -IEcl 9 ' < Rc ; .4 I
u ( r ) = A , CC i 0 , r > R c
i
The t o t a l bare ion potent ia l is then
I n order t o evaluate t he Fourier transform of the bare ion
potent ia l in a d-band metal, we put, following EIeine an4
Abarenkov (1964) and Animalu (1973)
so tha t 00
where i n the l a s t step, we have used the re la t ion OQ
C P p = l (4.67) a=o
The model potent ia l now takes the simple form
Eq. (4.68) is purely l o c d for r > % but non-local f o r
r < %, hence the matrix element of % between two plane waves I, ._ .+ - - A A % exp(ik.;) and dQ0 exp(izt.;) with E 1 = k+q, c~ now be
s p l i t i n to two parts as follows
where the loca l par t depends on only and is given by
- . . - \ while the non-local part depends on ?r, '7' t:nd and i s given
12 ( p1-c - -- cos 0 I j l (kr ) j l (k t r ) r2&
0
with
2&+1 hi-1 (x) = -y- q x ) - b-1 (XI for !Z > o
cor, 0 = ( k f 2 + k2 - q2)/2ktk .<, , . *,*.,. , ' .
By using t he re la t ion (%iff 1968 p. 86) of the form
L - we have f o r k. = kt
By u s k g the re la t ion
we have, f o r k
These a r e analyt ical expessions, involving only elementary
functions. Note t h a t i n these formulae t he AQ must be i n atomic
unj.1;~ ( i . e . ficuble rydber'gs ); " Theref ore, t h e f i n a l expression .A
f o r <hi%/k'> i s i n q+iwrgn.
The orthogmalizztion and correlation corrections, uoc and
u a re a lso loca l pc ten t ia l s and t h e i r contributions t o the cc'
-Z
l?~v.rier transfmm o the bare electron-ion interaction a r e a l so
For complctnass, we have t h a t t h e flcreened model potent ia l
i s given by
where t he l a s t term 1(7) represents the screening of the non-
l oca l (second) term 5.e.
2 2 pd .y~omkl o d we have used % B h p /2m*, m* being the bmd
effect ive mas8 including the e f fec t of electron-electron I "- .'
CouloTTih interactions. E( q) is the Hartree-Fock d i e l ec t r i c
function,
md i n t he Hubbard approximation
Apart from t he inclusion of the II =: 2 resonance t e r n ,
t he expressions a re the same as those for t h e simple metals.
The model pot%-Lial well-depths i n Eq.
where -:- 2 2 n k i2.2 P E = E F = - P 2m* Ed
(4.80) are expressed
f o r II = 0,1 (4.85)
(4.86)
4.6 MAGIJZTUDE OFc THE~.~~~~CX,_WP,L,~ZATI@N OR DEPLETION CHARGE
We proceed in t h i s section t o derive t h e magnitude L): t he
orthogona.Zjxation o r depletior, c2large i n terms of the model
potent ia l v,/(l3.f) and the,.inodel wave function $;. Shaw and . -.
Harrison (1967) appcached the problem of determining the
orthogonalization charge a from a more fundamental point of
view whereby a model potent ia l transformation replaces the
31
t rue Hartree equation f o r a s ingle ion:
li 2 (- , o2 + v(;)) $;(;) = E; +<(2) rL (4,881
v(;) being the t r u e ion core potent ia l plus the valence-electron
screening potent ia l , by a model wave equation
where V i s the bare ion model potent ia l , plus the same valence M ;i
electron screening potent ia l , as i n ~ ( r ) , The difference .A A
between the t rue e lec t r rn densiiy i$$r)$(r) m d t he "smooth" 4
part , ( ( I - ) , is defined by analogy with t he orthonogonr
1 ; : z d t i s 2 il(>L: of pseudopotential theory as a depletion hole :
The integral. i s over a ningle core volume % so tha t a
represents the depletion hole per electron a t a s ingle ion
s i t e , z being the valence o f t h e ion. To determine a, we use
(4.88) and (4.89) t o write
and
-+ - - A
Then we l e t k' - k = ;i and take q t o be small. On expanding 2.
the functions of <' around b, we obtain, t o lowest order i n t :
We Y W sub&lact (4.94) from (4.93) and integrate over the
volume 4 E W O L U A ~ one ion s i t e . Then on applying Green's ,I
theorem 50 t he terms on the left-hand side of t he resul t ing
equation, we see t h a t they contribute zero. since I& r $<
on the core boundary.
Thus we get the resu l t :
By v i r tue of (4.90) and (4.95) we have t h a t t h e depletion hole
is given in terms of t h e model po ten t ia l and t h e model
However, t h e depleticn 3ole a need not be t h e same a t every ion
s i t e but it can be s h m , i n t he lowest order of perturbation
93
theorfa t o be the sane a t every s i t e independent of ion
c~nf igu r&~ion . Our resu l t indicates t ha t a l oca l ( i .e. energy
independent) model poterkiul camot have a depletion hole.
But i n t he simplest approximation, we take t h e pseudowave A a
Punctim as a single plane wave, Q - ~ exp(ik . r ) , with no nixing 0
of waves by the periodic potent ia l i n t he solid. Then from
E q . (4.96) the Shaw-Harriaon d e ~ l e t i o n hole ( i n t he Haieree
approximation ) becomes Y
Now -;rc : :ze t h e f ac t t ha t only the non-local par t of t he model
potwtial . , V i'o-: r % dcpends expl ic i t ly on the energy, E, and 14
the approximation tha t Af = A2, f o r 2 > 2 t o obtain
are constants, we have
Shm and Harrison (1967) noted t h a t t he first cider estimate
of t he depletion hole (Eq. 4.99) a re PJWR~S too large. They
noted tha t i f we rewrits 1";~. 04.93) fo r t he depletion hole
using Eq. (4.91) end (4,921 as well as t he v i r i a l theorem,
we have
4.7 -p THEORY OF FMATRIX SCATTERING
1 n ' a metal, t he electrons--in t h e i r in te rna l motions are
alw~ys scattered by col l is ions with themselves and the l a t t i c e
s i t e s . Therefore i n tne standard treatment of e lectronic
properties of metals, -i,l,;! scat ter ing formalism is employed
extensively where t he l a t t i c e s i t e s in a perfect c rys ta l a re
regarded as the scat ter ing centres. The essence of a
scat ter ing problem l i e s in the determination of a f a r scat tered
f i e l d from a preswibed incident f ie ld . In t h i s section, we
sha l l carefully derive t h e theory of T-matrix sca t te r ing which
w i l l enable us t o es tabl ish an integral equation f o r t he
t r ans i t i on operctor. T.
Essentially, we s h a l l be interested i n solving
Schrodinger equation
h2 --v2J,+ql=EJI 2m A
f o r a sca t te r ing potent ia l ~ ( r ) ,
Rearranging t h i s equation we get
where we have put
A Thus we get an inhwa6'4&edhs equation with U( r ) as the source
A general solution of Eq. (4.105) is of t h e form
y -, ,;I a + % I _ ._ (4.107)
Since Eq. (4.198) is case or V) - 0, it represents a free-
pa r t i c l e o r a plane wave solution i.e.
But i n order t o solve Eq. (4.109) we use t h e Green function a
~ ( r , r ' ) technique which s a t i s f i e s the equation
A But s ince ~ ( r ) = , therefore, we have tha t
i2
which i s an integral equation with the unknown under the
integral sign. To obtain the Green function, we use an
integral representation t o the 6-function v i z .
i - and then assume a s imilar representation f o r ~ ( r , r ' ) i .e.
A d
G(F,;~) = !g(G)e iq . (r-r' a;i
Substituting Eq. (b .16) i n Eq. (5.13) we get 2 - A
A - iq. (r-rt 1 ~ ~ ( r , r ~ ) = - f e 2 d; k2 -
By changing t o sphe:.lcal coordinates with ' A -
(g - r f ) = R, and integrating out all the
then A a 1 G = -
4 i 1 r 2 ~ -ao k -q
4 i
lhis integrand has two poles < +k and q
polar axis along
angular dependence,
(4.120)
A
= -k. Using complex
variable method of integration, we sha l l choose the contour of -
integration which includes the pole +c and excludes the pole -k.
I n t h i s typical case, the contour is closed i n the upper half
plane and by the theory of residues
/f(z)dz = 21ri C residues (4.121)
we have
Since we require a solution t h a t tends t o f ( 0 )
. .
e i L F - where r
f (8) is the scattemingmnp3itude, then
98 7''"
Th-k gives the soL:.%ion of Eq. (1.105). Now in order t o
determine .%I abstract operator T, related t o V by
-u = 19, = W (4.124)
then the expl ici t srj.;r~.ion of Eq. (4.105) becomes
Y = (I - GT)Y, (4.125)
The determination of the operator T provides the solution '4'
everywhere witllin the scattering region. In order t o obtain the
far scattered f ields , only the values of matrix elements
<$acts w a ~ > on the she21 k ( the energy surface o r Fermi
surface in a metal.) are needed f o r description of the f a r
f ie ld .
We wish t o obtain the operator T we transform Eq. (4.123)
with an operator V, v i z
W = yvI, - VGyul (4.126)
or from Eq. (4.124) we have
w, = V$, - VGW (4.127)
Using Wa = W, we get
19, = vYl, - VGT$iwq * a (4.128)
Because of i ts validity for a l l $a in the Hilbert space
spanric: 17 $ , Eq. (4.128) becomes n
T =- V - VGT I e .. (4,129)
This is ~irc integrel equa$ion t o be solved, By simple
algebraic manipulation, we get from EQ. (1.129) the solution8
T = ( ~ - v G ) - ~ v (4.130)
T = V - VGV + VGVGV (4.131)
o r again
T = v ( ~ + G v ) - ~
This is an in f in i t e se r ies which is equivalent t o the
in tegra l in Eq. (4.129). The matrix elements of t h i s
t rans i t ion operator completely determine the probabi l i t ies of
t rans i t ions in the system. Thus the problem involving
p*rbkle scat ter ing can be reduced formally t o the solution
of an integral equation fo r the t rans i t ion operator T. As
already pointed out, t he T-matrix i s rela ted t o the V-matrix
used i n simple metals by the in tegra l Eqn (4.129) and both
reduce t o the same thing i n the Born approximation when we
throw away the higher order terms.
4.8 - T-MATRIX FORM FACTOR
I n the previous section, we have carefully established
an in tegra l equationfir the t rans i t ion operator T, we proceed L ,, 4 - 7 . ,:. , * $2 ' .
i n t h i s section t o solve the in tegra l equation in order t o
evaluate the T-matrix f o m factor ~ ( 2 ) i n terns of the V- 4
matrix form factor ~ ( g ) . I ) .- .+
If ve now use the one-particle Green's function in the
Lippaan-Schwinger form, viz:
of the T-matrix fo r a t rans i t ion on the energy surface can
be represented i n the form of an i n f i n i t e series
which corresponds t o the integral equation
which can be written in the momentum representation as
We can expand the potent ia l in p a r t i a l wave components
.. A
where v&( k' , k, E ~ ) is the p a r t i a l wave component o f the
potent ia l and 0 is the angle between the vectors E and c l . The various terms in Eq. (4.137) specify the interact ion i n
< , . ? < . > P ! * .P ~ .
s t a t e s with well-defined values of t he o rb i t a l angular
mmentum b. Similarly, the T-matrix and the scattering,
amplitude can be expanded i n pa r t iLd wave components in the I ' .< ..
form
and
A -r
where T (kt, k; E) represents the p a r t i a l t r ans i t i on matrix and 9"
f E denotes the p a r t i a l scat ter ing amplitude of the
entr-gy surface. Thus i n terms of the partial-wave amplitudes,
we can get from Eq. (4.136) the following equation f o r t he
p a r t i a l t rans i t ion matrix viz:
I n order t o move from the in tegra l equation i n momentum space t o
one i n energy, we use the f a c t t ha t
-3 3 ( 2 ~ ) Id p = ~ ! I ' ? ( E - ) ~ E ~ P
where N(E) i s the density of s t a t e s , and hence we have
By using complex analysis we can s p l i t up G(E;, EA) i n to the P
form
It is found tha t only the &function i n Eq. (4.143) contributes
t o t he i n t e g r d i n Eq. (4.142). %us t he integration of Eq.
( 4.142 ) yields the algebraic &&ion
A simple expression has been used f o r the density of s t a t e s viz
awl 4 is the r a t i o of the kth density of' s t a t e s t o the f r ee
eleckron density of s t a t e .
The scnt ter ing pertial amplitude fe(G' ,$;$) is connected
with the p a r t i a l t rans i t ion matrix l',(k',c;q) by the re la t ion
where v is the reduced mass. N s o , the p a r t i a l scat ter ing
amplitude on the energy surface can be expressed i n terms of
the phase s h i f t 6k(k) as
so tha t A - - is,
Tg(k' ,k;E) = - - s i n 6p
Similarly, the p a r t i a l V-matrix i n terms of phase s h i f t s is
where K = JE. In the special case of g = 1, we have t h a t
Eq. (4.147) and (4.148) sa t i s fy t he algebraic Eq. (4.144)
which gives < , < . , 5 . , . . , * > t ' .
1 i6, 1 i6, - jl s i n 6ke = - - t an 6, - i&- -- K tan 6 , e k K
i .e.
1 - s i n K
o r
s i n 6 i6k
ke = (l+ i h x ) t a n 6Q + s in 6
i 6 & 6& + s i n 6 e R
T h i s gives the re la t ion t h a t
(1 + iJFk) tan BE = 0
-L A *
Bo:: P, p a r t i a l mvc coupnent V (kt ,k;E) of t h e 2o ten t ia l i s R
This gives the model potent ia l of t he HAA - type i n the form
Ey using Eq. (4.151) and (4.152) i n the algebraic Eq. (4.144)
we can now re l a t e the T-matrix model potent ia l well depth h
A&(E) with t he V-matrix model potent ia l well depth A ~ ( E ) as h -1 h
A&E) = A&E) - i X Q A&E)A&E) A
and solving f o r Aks we get
= - A& -2 2 + &!L
+ All where
"ktt et resonance, i.. e. R = 2 we get
In t he s p i r i t of HAA model potential , we get
But g = 1, therefore, we have
By putt ing p = I' r, we get 'F
A t reeonance, i.e. R = 2 c ,< * *. 5. 5 la
In t h i s analysis, we have sham i n Eq. (4.154) t h a t i n t he T-
matrix formla t ion of the model potent ia l theory, there is a
s m a l l corj :xtion t o the ordinary V-matrix model potent ia l
well depth A ~ ( E ) which i s obtained i n t h e Born approximation.
Also t he T-matrix model potent ia l well depth A~(E) is
characterized bg the r ea l and imaginary parts . This o b s e m -
t i on enables us t o account f o r t he resonances which occur
i n the d-band metals. In order t o apply the above
treatment t o d-states, we shall c a r e m l y describe t he
hybridized v i r t ua l bomd s t a t e problem i n t he next section.
4.9 VIRTUAL BOUND STATE PROBLEM ------.--.
Considering the s-d hybridization i n t he resonance model,
we sha l l r eca l l that. t1.c bound s t a t e s are degenerate with
f r ee electron conduction band s ta tes . But i n t he in te rac t ing
model, new e j genst~tte:: ere formed by hybridization between
loca l and bound s ta tes . In the case of v i r t ua l bound s t a t e ,
Frf.edel and 3l.andin-I 61.959) ' have shown t h a t by analyzing t h e
plane wave conduction electrcn ~ t a t e s of angular momenL,uin R,
phase shirks can 3 e u,,ed ti, .:i-?cj'ibe many physical measurable
prcpv - ' - i e a , The phsse c,hifltS ere t he pttramcters t h a t contain
t he ~ f ~ e c t of tlie scat ter ing. They a r e posi t ive f o r a t t r ac t i ve
poten b i d s but nega.l;ive f o r repulsive potent ia ls . For t he
d-band metals, the d phase s h i f t ( R = 2 ) varies rapidly with
energy E between two m'litiples of K i n the resonance region
loG
i n order to accmodate appmximately the Z!(2%+1) which corresponds
t o 10 electronic: sl-dLes of its d she l l witliin t he v i r t u a l bound d
s t a t e created. The other phase s h i f t s f c r P 2 remain small
over t h i s energy range. Thus the excess density of s t ~ t e s
introduced has mah:r. d character peaked around Ed. Tine theom
of scsCtering by a muffin t i n potent ia l reveal t h a t at
resonance
-1 I w c*(E) = tan ~ f i p
which follows t h a t
and t h e scat ter ing amplitude becomes
while the t o t a l scat ter ing cross-section and t h e derivation
dG2/dE are given by
In & . typ ica l scat ter ing by a 3d l eve l , the addit ional density I I .+
of eie-tron s t a t e s associated with t h e virtual bound s t a t e s
m a expression ascertain* mat t h e density of s t a t e of 8
d-band metal, upon traversing the resonance exhibits very
prcmounced peeked and i s Lorentzian.
By using the re la t ions fo r T-matrix i n Eqs. ( 4 ~ 4 2 ) , (4.143) =d (4.144), we obtain t h a t B r R resonant s t a t e at
energy Er,
Thus fo r the d-band metals fo r instance, the resonance occurs
f o r t he R = 2 s t a t e s due t o the high-lying narrow d-band
hybridization strongly with the broad s-conduction bands. This
e f fec t i s noticed i n
e n e r a dependence of
depth $(E) (hLnicalu
t h e nodel potent ia l theory as a strong
the fonn ( E - E ~ ) - ~ i n the 2 = 2 well
1973b). For the R a 2 resonant s t a t e ,
the spectroscopic term values used i n deriving these model
potent ia l parameters f a l l in to the resonance region of t he
Ag, versus E curve m a *ab~fiOb supply complete information near
the resonance energy E t Ed. Hence, the important zesul t of
the TMMP is tha t t he R = 2 well c!opth has the form
This resu l t presents tke Ziff icul ty of i n f i n i t e solutions a t
resonance. For our purposes, we s h a l l take into account t he
f i n i t e width W of t he resonant s t a t e , and thereby modify the
well depth into the fonn
C (4.170) ( E~-E)+~ iw
which is a complex result f r o m the nSove T-mstrh formulation.
In the d-band metals we have that fo r J?, = 2, the contribution
t o the model pot-nt ia l well depth has the r ea l and imaginary
parts viz:
and
A
In general All i n t he T-matrix theory and Ak i n the V-matrix
theory are releted by Eq. (4.154) above. I n the d-band
resonance formulation by knimalu (1974) using Regge pole
theozy, the resonance well depth fo r energy band is of
u .< < - 6 ,?. , . 2 '
But i n the scat ter ing theory, the T-mtrix capable t o handle
the t r a n s p o ~ t properties, gives rise t o
Correspondingly, t he model potent ia l well depth for the
resonance i n the d-state of the d-band metals i s of a general
fonn
w e l l depth in to the fonn
C (4.170)
( E ~ - E ) + ~ ~ W
which is a complex result from the n5me Twatrix fornulation.
I n the d-band metals we have that for = 2, the contribution
t o the model potnntial well depth has the r ea l and imaginary
parts viz:
and
-. A
In general A$ i n the T-matrix theory and A& i n the V-matrix
theory are releted by Eq. (4.154) above, In the d-band
resonance formulation by finimalu (1974) using Regge pole
theory, the resonance well depth f o r energy band is of
the farm ax*w
A 2 ( ~ ) = Ed - E (4.173)
c , < ' , 5 ?' % 'J
But i n the scat ter ing theory, the T-mtrix capable t o handle
the transport properties, gives r ise t o
Correspondingly, t he model potent ia l well depth for the
resonance i n the d-stake of the d-band metals is of a general
fonn
reg where C is a constant. The expression for R d i f f e r s f r o m
the one given by the Born approximation due t o the presence
of the complex term J ~ w i n the denominator. This additional
term essent ia l ly eliminates Kohn anomaly ( ~ o h n 1959) i n the
form of singularity. The remvnl of t h i s s ingular i ty ensures
tha t the scat ter ing of a d-resonant potent ia l is regular and
well-behaved.
In t h i s section, we have used a different approach t o A
determine the model potential well depth $(E) i n the T-
matrix formulation as indicated i n Eqs. (4.171) and (4.172)
Our resu l t here involves a d-resonace expression whose energy
band parameters re ly on Kd and KF f o r t he evaluation of the A
m d e l potential well depth $(E). We have already obtained a
s imilar resu l t i n the previous section i n Eq. ( 4 -154 ) by using
an exact theory tha t involves a T-matrix integral equation.
Our r e su l t (~q. 4.15)+) in t h i s case does not depend on energy
band parameters end is a s t r ik ing feature of the exact theory. ,, 4 , 6 5. ,
Conclusively, it is remarkable tha t t he bound s t a t e is
of the form
! - .*
which is well represented by the sketch shown i n Fig. 4.5(s).
But the v i r tua l bound s t a t e includes the imaginary par t and is
of the form
This is represented by an oscillatory form as shown in Fig.
4-5(b).
F ign 4 . 5 (a) Bound State
Virtual
f l ~ - 4 . 5 (b)
Bound State
CHAPTER 5
APPLICATIOH TO THE FHONON FREQUENCIES OF d-BAND METALS
INTRODUCTION
In the preceeding chapter, we have discussed the energy
bands of d-band metals i n order t o display the occurrence of
s-d hybridization. We have also shown how t h i s hybridization
is simulated i n the framework of the pseudopotential o r
model potent ia l method. In order t o use the pseudopotential
o r model potential d e r i ~ e d from the energy band theory fo r
investigation of electron-phonon interaction and other electron
scat ter ing processes, we have made a c lear dis t inct ion between
the V-matrix (used in Energy band theory) and t h e T-matrix
(required f o r scat ter ing theory). I n t h i s chapter, we- wish
t o apply the above theoqr t o the specif ic examples of d-band
metals namely: vanadium, nrobium and tantalum, which a re of
grefit i ~ t e r e s t because of t h e i r high superconducting
trarisi t ion tc-iperature.
Experimental plionon &eWency measurements in bcc
Bril louin zone (see f ig . 5.1) &band metals vanadium, niobium
and tantalum show tha t t h e i r phonon dispersion curve exhibit
a number of ~ t r i k i n g pectflaritces, par t icular ly soft modes
and Kohn anomalies. It is 6;P interest to ascer ta in how much
of these pecular i t ies arise from the !l'MMP form fac tor ~ ( g ) -14-4-
end how much from the inverse d i e l ec t r i c matrix E (q+g,q+gl )
which has been the focus o f many of the exis t ing microscopic modele.
Fig 5-4
BRlLLOUlN ZONE FOR bcc STRUCTURE , . . '
The quantitative aspects
theory of l a t t i c e 4fnmics so
114
of the app2.ication of the general
far developed requires the calcul-
at ion of the loca l f i e l d correction which is represented as an
a t t r ac t ive short-range force and the calculation of t he various
contributions t o the d y n d c a l matrix. I n order t o achieve
these objectives, we sha l l i n section 5.2 demonstrate t h e
cancellation of t he repulsive short-range forces by the local
f i e l d correction. In section 5.3, we s h a l l calculate the
coulombic and Born-Mayer contributions t o the phonon
frequencies and i n section 5.4, we s h a l l display the calculations
of the electronic contribution and loca l f i e l d corrections t o
the phonon frequencies.
5.2 =NSTRATION 0-3 TEE CANCEUTION OF SHORT-WJGE FORCES BY
THE LOCAL FIELD CORRECTlON
W e proceed i n this section t o demonstrate expl ic i t ly the
cancellat~.cn o r scresning of t he short-range forces by the off-
dlagoilal ccmpnent cop. $.he, inverse d ie l ec t r i c matrix.
Tfia phonon dispersion re!.oti.on i n a metal having a Bravais
l a t t i c e s t ructure is determines by the secular equation
where 6 is %he phonon wave vector restricted t o the first
Bril louin tone; c8(;) i a the B conqponent (8 1.2.3) of the B unit polarization rector , with (longitudinal or transverse)
polariaation in&x a; M is the maas of t;he icm; aab
is the dynamical ( 3 x 3 ) matrix, consistifig cf t h e Coulombic
contribution 'JC the repulsive contribution D~ and the aR' a6
E electronic contribution DaR.
As is well-known, the dynasical matrix i n Eq. (5.2) i s
the Fourier transform of the respective p a i r r i s e interatomic
potentiel s, wC, # end 8. Here
r e p r e ~ e n t s the long-range "bare" ion coulomb gvtent ia l of -
chemical valence z , where Ri and 5. are the positions of the J
. th 1 m d j t h i o n s .
denotes the short-range ion-ion potential of the Born-Mayer type
where A and p are constants given by the volume and t he
compr+rJsibility data which represent a measure of the r ig id i ty
of th :.+.eraction "&d7'fi' thd equilibrium separation between 0
the pe i r of ions. Animalu (19778) has shown tha t the pa i r
potential a r i s ing from the t o t a l electronic (band-structure)
energy of the system may be wrieten i n the form:
where
and
Go and GQc being the diagonal and off-diagonal components of
the energy wave number character is t ic matrix Rznction:
The f i r s t term on the r ight represents t he diagonal non-local
pseudopotential par t while t he second t e r n incorporates both
t h e diagonal local pseudopotential par t and the off-diagonal
part.
!The t o t a l pa i r potent ia l is of t he form
$(R) = w~(R) + #(R) - W?R) o + ~ J R )
NOW, i f Go and GRc have the same s i p , then the
dq ( 5 . 9 )
screening
action of the electron gas may be well represented as p a r t i a l
C cancc3.1~tion of W + # by f + Sc. However, a r i s e s in Ilc
t he f r m m o r k of psoudapott?frtial theory f r o m the overlap of
core fmctionss it is apparent t h a t it ma;y have the same
spa t i a l dependence as 8 and therefore tends t o cancel 9. In
terms of t he associated dypamickl matrices,
and
t he two contributions a re seen t o have opposite sign, but the
determination of the effectiveness of the cancellation requires
expl ic i t numerical computation. Such a calculation was
performed by O l i and Animalu ( 1976) f o r vana.dium.
In order t o dewnstrate the screening o r cancellation of
the shofi-range (~orn-~ayer) contribution m d longrange
(~oulombic) contribution i n rea l space, w e have from Eq. (5.9)
t h a t the t o t a l interatomic pa i r potent ia l i s of the form
where 2 00 s in R
wE(R) a + $ c ( ~ ) , G(;) -y$- dq (5.13) 0
We have shown i n chapter 3 t ha t i n the Thomas-Fed approxima-
t ion, the diagonal and off-diagonal components of the energy
wave number charac te r i s t ics"m~t r fx f'unct ion takes the form
Thus Eq. ( 5.12 ) becomes
Transforming the above expression, we get ,
Q)
R Z Z ~ ? ? s i n ~q w~(R) = w'(R) + w (R) - (-Tr q (5.16) o q ( d + ~ * )
But we have also shown i n chapter 3 t ha t
Then Eq. (5.16) takes the form
By putting
we get
In t he above expression ( ~ q . 3.201, the t h i l Z term screens o r
cancels the long-rmge ( coulombic ) conti-ibntion , while t he
fourth and l a s t term screens o r cancels the repulsive short-
range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) contr<P,i:tion. It i s found tha t t he l a s t
term has some common features with the a t t r ac t ive short-range
( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) force described in chapter 3.
Thewyore, a carerul examination of t he r e su l t s of the
calculation t o be presented i n section 5.4 shows tha t in the
principal crystallographic direction, we nay simulate the
resu l t s by putting
f o r t he longitudinal branches, In t h i s expression ( ~ q . 5.21)
B represents the a t t r ac t ive short-range (~orn-Mayer ) potent ia l
coefficient as was indicated i n section 3.4, while A denotes
t h e repulsive short-range (~orn-Mayer) potent ia l
coeff ic ient whichaw&s emlier presented i n section 2.2. We
have incorporated exp(-aq/2n) i n Eq. (5.21) a s an empirical
damping factnr.
In order t o preservq th,e;-symmetry (crossover a t P and H
of longitudinal and t r a n v e r s e branches 1, we put
%c = - aw: exp(-aq/2~) (5.22)
fo r t he transverse branch, where the fac tor a represents the
normalized orthogonalisation charge which is characterized by
120
z (l+a) e , while exp( -aq/2n) i s a numerical dmping factor.
Thus the local f ield correction arising f r o m the
longitudinal branches is characterized by en at tract ive
short-range (~orn-&layer ) f ~ r c e . But in the transverse
branches, local f i e l d correction was found by adjustment to
arise from the model potential through the orthogonalisatfan
charge.
In chapter 3, we had used the 8-d interaction t o obtain
numerical values of the at t ract ive short-range om-~ayer)
-fficimts ss indicated i n Table 3.1. Apart from the sign,
our numerical results were found to be of the erne order of
magnitude as the repulsive short-range (Born- eyer) parametera
obtained empirically by Huntington ( 1953).
5.3 COULOMBXC AND BORN-MAYE3 CONTRIBIJTIONS TO THE PROMON
We proceed in t h i s section t o calculate the phonon
frequencies in unit of the ion plasma frequency w defined by P
The detailed analysis of the c~ l cu l a t i on of the coulombic '.
contribution ( Coulomb.' f requenw ) t o the phonon spectra in
the three principsl directions 1100+-\ , and '~11 of the - - -- -L .- - bcc Brillouin zone (see fig. 5.1) w i l l be presented.
The coulombic contribution t o the d y n d c a l matrix
diecussed in section 2.3 can now take the folrm
In t h i s expression,
and
In t he pr incipal directions, the dynamical matrix is
diagonal giving t he longitudinal and transverse modes as
follows :
The r e s u l t of t h i s c a l c u l ~ t i o n has been reported by various & , , 4 .6. ... '
authors e. g. Vosko e t al ( i965) . The resultimg coulomb
frequencies are tabulated i n Table 5.1.
TABLE 5.1
Coulomb Frequencies w2 (in units of w2 in each of the three C P
directions[loo 1 , L110 -,! ' ' and 111 , ( ~ w k o et al 1965) for bcc
The theory of the Born-Wer contribution t o the phonon
frequency has been given i n section .3. The de ta i l s of the cal-
culation of the Born-Mayer repulsive contributions a re cs follows:
The dynamical matrix has the form
Explicit ly, the dispersion relation ?
vectors i n the longitudinal (1) and two transverse (T1 and T*)
di rec t ions :
Eq. ( 5 . 3 2 ) v i t h &,L) t ha t
and
Thus - ' b -( 1; I-R~)/P-
n - d 1 1 1 - 2 = - 1 1--exp( iq .~ ) "L % + o L P e - - . n -.!
n
Since we are t o sum over complete she l l s of reciprocal l a t t i c e , -
vectors which include 'f& :?' -k , for each n in the imginary n9 n
parts i n these summation vanish. Each branch m a y be expressed
in unit of the ion p l a sm frequency by writing, e.g.
The results of the ca lcdat ion o f the Born-Mayer contribution t o
the phonon frequency had been displayed i n Section 2 .3 for vanadium,
niobium and tantalum in Tebles 2.1, 2 .2 and 2.3 respectively.
The computation was performed at the Computer Centre University o f
Nigeria, Nsulcka by usin@; the IBM 370. The program i s displayed in
Appendix B .
. < , ? . < $.,? , . a * '
We turn next t o the electronic contribution which will
include the local f i e l d correction. The dynamical matrix o f the
electronic contribution discussed in Section 3.3 is now of the form
In t h i s expression,
and
In the principal directions, the dynamical matrix is
diaganal giviug the longtitudinal and transverse modes as follows:
me program for computing th i s has two parts, namely: performing
the summn.tions over 368 reciprocal l a t t i c e vectors and calculation
of G(<) which depends on the model potenfial. The 368 reciprocal
lattice vectors are of the form:
The electronic contribution consists of the diagonal and off-
diagonal psrts. The dip4pbal part represents the usual electronic
contr<b u-tion srhi;? ?he off-diagonal par t represents the loca l
f i e l d correction.
We observe t ha t b c c a ~ s e o,f the complexity of the calculation
of the om-diagonal ;wrt representing the loca l field correction,
it i s difS.cult t o o3taiii numerical resu l t s consistent with the
synnetry requirements whenever the sumations are cut off af'ter a
f i n i t e number of reciprocal l a t t i c e vectors is included. Therefore, ., ,, . , c . C' 5 '
instead of ~Pop t ing the lonz-rmge method of eva1w.l i v y the loca l
f i e l d correction, we hhal l ir, t h i s thes i s obtain numerical values
of the local f i e l d correction by the short-range method. In our
calculation, +*he local fie18 sotkection is regarded as an attractive
short-range interatomic force laving the same functionaJ. form i n
real space as the Born-Payer repulsion due t o the overlap of core-
electron wavefunctions centered on neighbouring ions. The local
f i e ld correction of the longitudinal branches are simulated
by Eq. (5.21) while the tr=sveme branches assumed t o be zero
by O l i and Animalu (1976) ar2 found t o be non-zero and are
simulated by 6q. (5.22) .
The numerical resul ts fYoa the computation of the elect-
ronic contr? bution t o the phonon frequencies and the loca l f i e l d
corrections are presented i n Tables 5.2,'5.3, j.4, 5.5, 5.6, and
5.7 for vanadium, niobium and tantalum respectively. But i n
Table 5.8 we display the c m a r i s o n of our numerical resul ts of
the 1oca.l f i e ld correction by short-waves w i t ? the ea r l i e r
nmer ica l resul ts obtained by O l i and Animalu (1376) by the reciprocal l a t t i c e
method of long-waves. The model potential p e r a e t e r s used in our
calculation8 are s h m ~ in Table 5.9; and i n Table 5.10, we present
the other quatititier ;&?ch were used in the computation of the
phonon f'requencies. The computer program for the above elaborate , , 4 " 5 . . ' '
computation i s d i sp ley~d i n Appendices C and D.
Elect ronic Contribution w2 ( i n u n i t s u 2 ) for vanadium e P
TABLE 5.3 --,
Electronic Cortributicm w2 ( i n un i t s w 2 ) for niobium e P
TA3LE 5.4 3__
Electronic Contribution r? ( i n units u2) for tantalum e P
0.1 0.001 0.000 0. 003 0,000 0.000 0.003 0.000
0.2 0.001 0.00: 0.007 0.000 0.001 0.010 0.001
0.3 0.005 0.001 0.011 0.000 0.002 0.013 0.002
0.4 0.006 0.002 0.014 0.000 0.002 0.011 0.004
0.5 0.008 0.003 0.01S 0.000 0.002 0.007 0.006
0.6 0.008 0.003 0.003 0.008
0.7 0.007 0.004 0,001 0.007
0.8 0.007 0.004 0.003 0.006
0.9 0.006 o .oo4 0.005 0.005
1.0 0.0'35 0.004 $ 3 6 . , , 3 '
0.005 0.004
Local Fie ld Correction w2 fo r Niobium k
TABLE 5.8 .--..
Comparison of Local F ie ld Correction by the rtciprocal lattice
TABLE 5.9
~ D E L P O ~ I A L P- Bet . 6)
TABLE 5.10 .. PAEWEBBS FOR PHONON F R E Q U E N C ~ CALCULA&ON
Metals
Niobium
Model pot. well-depth f o r E = o
A.
Metals Density (p)
Vanadium I 6 . ow
Vanadium 1 3.250
F e d u a v e r 5 1.097
Tantalum 1 16.660
Correct inn Energy Ec
3.500
2.400
2.300
Model pot. well-depth forRs1
%
Niobium
Ion-Plasma Frepuency V
39 189
1. 900
1.007
2.900
2.250
2.250
Model pot well-depth forhl
A2
i Tantalum 1.850
18.342 '
z.600
2.000
2.000
Model p o t ) ~ t d e Chemical Effective Valence Mass
z ma
, I
radius
Rm
93.9ao
121.300
121.300
Volume a
lon-cord Effective radius
Rc
0.100 !LO00
orthogonalisstion charge aeff
l.OO0 1 1.115 1 0.031
5.W
5.000
0.100 1.000 0.038
1,000 0,038 0.100 -------
6.1 INTRODUCTION
I n the previous chapter, we have a p ~ ~ i e a our i m a l i s m of
l a t t i c e dynamics i n the calculation of the long-range caulombic
contriLution , the rep iLsive short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) contribution
and the electronic contribution t o the phonon ~ p e c t r a of vanadium,
niobium and tantalum. In t h i s chapter, we shal l combine these
contributions i n order t o obtain numerical resul ts for our specific
d-band metals.
I n section 6.2, we shal l cornpare the theoretical phonon dis-
persion curves w i t h experiment; and i n section 6.3 we sha l l give
a br ief summary and attendant conclusion.
6.2 COMPARISON OF CALCULATED PHONON FRE- WITH EXP-
In t h i s section, we proceed t o compare the theoreticd. phonon
dispersion curves with experiment, .On gathering resul ts fron the , & ,< . . ,6. ,a' 3 ' . I *
previous chapter, we have tha t the calculated phonon dispersion
relat ion is given formally by
But based on the tabulated values of we, the coulomb frequency
( ~ a b l e 5. I ) ; wr, the repulsive short-range (~orn-~ayer ) contri-
bution ( tables 2.1 - 2.3) ; we, the electronic contribution (Tables
5.2-j.4); and uk, t h e at t rzct ive short-range f m e ( loca l f i e l d
correction) Tab1,es 5.5-5.7) ; the calculated f'reguencies now take
t he form
i n uni ts of i012 E7..
Our nuiflei-icd r . suit f o r the t o t a l frequency excluding the
a t t r ac t ive shor t-range force is presented i n Tables (6.1-6.3) but - A- ....
the corresponding phonon dispersion e w e s sir the L100_) ,1110 1 - -! . -
r --*
and i - l l l j crystallographic directions a re displayed i n Figs.
(6.1-6.3) fo r vanadium, niobium and tantalum. In these figures,
we have compared our nunerical resu l t s with the experimental
points obtained by Colella and Batterman (1970), Nabaeawa and
Woods (1969, and Woods ( 19643 f u r vanadium, niobium a d tantalum
respectively.
A similar comparison is made while including the contribution
from the a t t rac t ive sh~~: tyrwge force, The inclusion of thi,:
contribution yields the t o t a l frequency given in Tables ( 6.4-6.6)
while the corresponding phonon dispersion curves i n the principal
crystallographic directions are , displayed _ _ in f igs . (6 ,4-6.6).
Here, we h e ~ c compred cur p2esent theory with the ea r l i e r
numerical calculations io Vuadium (01i and Anixalu 1976), niobium
(~n ima lu 1977) and tea:,-,: -9% (Ariimalu 1973a! .
Thus, inclusion of the local f i e l d correction which is well-
represented as an at t rac t ive short-range farce made a significant
improvement i n the ag eement between theory and experiment,
especially, i n the [ l l i j - and [ll~l branches. Ihe most s t r ik ing -1
agreement with experiment was the cross-over of the longitudinal r
and transveree branches i n the / 1111 direction a t the boundaries - 2
P and H, and the realination of the sound vel.ocity a t l aw reduced A r' -
MM vector (ii: of the tranverse branches in the 110 1 direction t,
=ising from the plot t ing of basically the coulombic contributian
??hi& ~bsorbs all o t k r contributions. Specif i c a w , we have
uiscd our present theory in niobium t o obtain for the first time in
t h i s approach the crossing of the t w o lower traverse branches
(TI and T ~ ) i n the 110 d i rec t im. However, in the Ll00i L 1 direction, our theory also gives the crossing of the longitudinal
and transverse branches for niobium and tantalum.
Tot& Frequency Y (in units of 1012 HZ) excluding the attractive
TABLE 6.2
Total Frequency d i n uni t s of lo1* Hz) eeluding the a t t r ac t i ve
short-range force (local f i e l d correction) i n niobium A A
(a/2n)q(lT1);=q(1,0,0) q=q(1,1,0) q = q(1,1,1)
L T L T1 T2 L T
' 8 .1 2.0918 1 . 0 1 2.7948 0.9905 1.3687 3.3022 1.4780
TABLE 6.3
Total Frequency d i n units of 10 l2 HZ) excluding the attractive
shortrange force (local field correction), i n Tantalum
W ~ E 6.4
Total Frequency in uni t s o f 1012 HZ) including the ~t tract ive short-
r a g e force (local f i e l d correction), i n vanadium
Total F'repuency in units of 1012 HZ) including the a t t r ac t ive
shortrange force (local f i e l d correction) i n niobium,
Total Frequency d i n units of 1012 ? z ) inc luding the attractive
short range force (local f i e l d correction) i n Tantalum.
F R E Q U E N C Y ( I O ~ ~ ~ H , )
Phonon Dirpmrdon Curve in Tantalum includinq calculated local f ield Correctim in thm 11 00], D lo]? and [I l d imt ion8 re~pectively exporimmntol L a - -- Animalu (1973b) present theory
6.3 SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIOIT
In t h i s section, we wish t o summasize what has been so
far achieved i n t h i s thesis and indicate directions fo r further
application of the theory.
I n this thesrs we have presented the formalism of the
l a t t i c e dynamics of d-band metals with a view t o identify the
effect of the loca l f i e l d correction and short-range forces on
the interatomic forces. In our formalism, we have used the stand-
ard adiabatic and h w i n i c approximations t o show tha t the
r';mamical matrix for phonon dispersion relat ion i n s Bravis
. i - ~ t t i e e is s p l i t , as i n the case of simple metals, i n to a sum
of three terms, namely, the coulombic contribution due t o the
long-range coulomb interaction between the bare ions of the
metal, a repulsive short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) contribution due t o
?lo overlap of the core-electron ravefunctions centered on neigh-
bowing ions, and the electronic contribution due t o t he indirect c $ 3 < 5 . <.' 8 *
ion-ion interaction v i a the polar isat ion f i e l d of the conduction
electrons. The electronic contribution involves, therefore the
screening action of the gas of conduction electrons through the I ' _ .I
electron-phonon interaction matrix elements, g3 which are pro- s,X'
portional t o the screened pseudopotential o r mo6el potent ia l i
form factor, ~ ( q ) .
Because of the v i r tua l bound character of the transition-metal
d-electrons, loca l f i e l d corrections a r i s e i n the conventional
screening calculation, as the off-diagonal components of the inverse
d ie lec t r ic matrix. In order t o show how the v i r tua l bound chare-
c t e r of d-electrons lead t o local f i e l d correction, we have used
the Fourier inversion of the off-diagonal par t of the electronic
contribution t o the dynarical mrttrix i n the transition-Metal
Model Potent ia l (TMMF') approximation of O l i and Animalu (1976) t o
show how the interatomic forces associated with the loca l f i e l d
correction nay be defined in real space. Due t o the complexity
of th is pseudopotential approach, we have adopted s d i rec t method
using actual atomic potentials end charge densi t ies via s-d inter-
action t o parameterize loca l f i e l d correction as an a t t rac t ive
short-range force, having the same functional form i n r ea l space as
the Born-Mzyer type. This apporach also enabled us t o formulate
a theory which can be ussd..ae la basis t o explain the origin of
the Born-Mayer potent ia l from the f i r s t principle.
The energy bands of d-band metals a r e incorporated i n t h i s
thesis i n order t o display the ocumrence . .- of s-d hybridization
and t o show how this hybridization i s simulated i n the f'rmework
of the pseudopotential o r model pokential meth3d. We have also
made a c lear d i ~ $ i n c t i o n between V-matrix and Fmatr ix iri order
t o use the pseudopotential or model potential derived from the
energy band theory for investigation of electronphonon inter-
action m d other electron sca t te r ing processes.
We have applied the above formalism t o Group VB bcc
t r ans i t i on m e t a l ~ vanadium, niobium and tantalum which have a
number of in te res t ; ng electronic properties such as high supel-
conducting t rans i t ion temperature. Our theoret ical r e su l t s for
these metals a re i n good agreement with experimental resu l t s .
The previous calculations by Pal (1974), O l i and Animalu (2976)
could not give symmetry agreement a t P i n the [111] direction
i n vanadium. Also, the calculations by V a m end Weber ( 19791,
Fielek (1980) in niobium, and the recent numerical calculation
using the pseudopotential approach by Sin& and Tripathi (1901)
i n tantalum, ha8 a l so f a i l ed t o get the required symmetry at same
P in the / 1111 d' ~ r e c t i o n . It i s remarkable t o note t ha t our i
numerical calculations.iaa&his thes i s achieved the symmetry require-
ment a t the zone boundaries P and H i n vanadium, niobium and
tantKlun. This j u s t i f i e s the representation of loca l f i e l d
correction as an a t t r ac t ive yhortArange . .- force associated with
s-d interaction.
I n practice evaluation of the l oca l f i e l d correction by the
reciprocal l a t t i c e method i n ~ l v e s a complicated t r i p l e summation
over an in f in i t e s e t of recipl-cel l a t t i c e vectors and it is
d i f f i cu l t t o obtain numerical refiults consistent with the
symmetry requirements whenever the summations are cut a f t e r
a f i n i t e numbel of reciprocal l a t t i c e vector is included, But
i n t h i s thes is , we hay.: evaluated local f i e ld correction by the
a t t rac t ive shor t - rq ;e force. Our approach in t h i s direction
is direct m d l e s s complicated. Comparison of the numerical
resul t s of local f i e ld correction in Table 5.8 for vanadium and
the phonon dispersion curves i n f igs (6.1-6.6) for vanadium,
niobium and tantalum by the reciprocal l a t t i c e method and use of
a t t rac t ive short-range force indicate tha t the use of a t t rac t ive
short-range form g i v e s . ~ be t te r agreement with experiment.
Thus, the ea r l i e r complicated procedure of evaluating local
f i e l d correction by the use of reciprocal l a t t i c e method can
now be replcced by the use of a t t rac t ive short-range force
which is be t te r and sirnglkr ,.to dmndle.
In t h i s thesis , our numerical resul ts have demonstrated
that the local f i e ld ccrrection which was ea r l i e r shown t o a r i se
P r ~ m the off-diagonal component of the inverse d ie lec t r ic matrix I - -.
CEUI d s o he ,-cpresented as an a t t rac t ive short-rage fbrce v ia
s-d interaction. This contribution cancels o r "screens" the
repulsive short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) force, Correspondingly, the
diagonal component of the inve-se die lec t r ic matrix which a r i ses
from the other par t of the electron-phonon interaction i n the
electronic contribntion cancels o r "screens" the long-range
(coulombic) force. Our numerical resu l t s show t ha t the canceller-
t ion or screening of the repulsive short-range ( ~ o r n - h y e r )
force by the a t t rac t ive short-range force i s such tha t the
effect ive short-range interatomic force turns out t o be a t t rac t ive
rather than repulsive i n vanadium, niobium and tantalum. This
observation is believed t o account fo r some peculiar shapes of
the major s o f t modes observed in- these metals.
We sha l l not conclude t h i s thesis without pointing out
some areas of possible application and future research. Having
s e t up an s-d intercction model for d-bad metals whereby the
loca l f i e l d correction is represented by an a t t rac t ive short-range
force, it i s noted tha t our successful application t o phonon
frequency calculations c a l l into, play a nufaber of other possible ,, .*6 ,. % 14-
applications.
Thus, an area of special concern is the superconductivity
of d-band metals and the i r compomds. There is a strong evidence I ' . .. - f i l
that the electron-phonon coupling constant, 1, and hence the
t rans i t ion temperature is very sensi t ive t o the phonon frequencies
i n the strong-coupling superconductors. A microscopic understanding
of the l a t t i c e dynamics i n the high superconducting t r ans i t i on
temperature materials is therefore of considerable importance
i n understanding c lear ly the factors which control superconducting
t rane i t ion tem2era.tu1-e i n these waterials.
The knowledge of the calculation of the interatom5.c forces
i n d-band metnls from microsoopic theory through the model poten-
t i a l theory, givcs the prospect of understanding the concept of
electron-phonon coupling mechanism. Such calculations require a
knowledge of both the band s t ruc ture and the eletron-phonon matrix
element. It i s of i n t e r e s t t o note t h a t information about electron-
pl?.onon coupling required t o understand the mgnitude of
superconducting t r ans i t i on temperature can be extracted d i r ec t l y
from measured phonon dispersion re la t ions empirically. The
remarkable pecu l ia r i t i es observed i n the phonon dispersion curves
in vmadiun, niobium and tantalum such as the softening of phonon
modes i n well-defined- ''reeion; of reciprocal space a re possible
sources of the l a t t i c e i n s t eb i l i t y which accompany changes i n
parameters essociated with high su?zrconductinfl t rans i t ion
temperature. . ..
The subject matter of t h i s t he s i s can be usefully applied i n
discuss ir,g s t r ~ c t u r a l phase t rculs i t ions . Many d-band metals and
t h e i r compounds undergo phase t r ans i t i on , It w i l l be of i n t e r e s t
t o extend the study of the s t ruc tura l phase t rans i t ion in vanadium
compounds: vanadium t i n ( v ~ s ~ ) , veradium tr ioxide (V 0 ), niobium 2 3 n i t r ide ( ~ b N), vsnadiun n i t r ide (VN) e t c which are of great
i n t e re s t due t o the i r high superconducting t rans i t ion tempereture.
In t h i s research, we have formulated the theory of the
a t t r ac t ive short-range ( ~ o r n - ~ a y e r ) force via s-d interaction
which is associated with the loca l f i e ld correction. This apporach
has been applied t o the simple closepacked body centered cubic
(bcc) structure. It is expected tha t t h i s research can be fur ther
extended t o the other simple closepacked structures such as the
face centered cubic ( fcc) and hex~gonal close packed (hcp)
structures.
We have used the pseudopotential theory t o generate the
Yukawa short-range force which is similar t o the existing force
i n nuclear physics. Therefore, it i s believed tha t t h i s new idea
should be the f i r s t stk$'%w&d~ the application of pseudopotential
theory t o nuclear physics, This s t r ik ing l i nk should -J* explored
i n de t a i l by experts in Solid s t a t e f ~ u c l e a r Physics.
In'conclvsion, we have r e p e n t e d local f i e l d correction as
an a t t rac t ive short-range component having the same functional
form in r e a l space as the Born-Mayer repulsion due t o overlap of
core electron wave functions centred on neighbouring ions, but of
an order of magnitude l a rge r t h ~ n the conventional Born-Meyer
potential , so t ha t the resul tant short-range interabomic potent ia l
is a t t rac t ive . We have provided a convenient method of including
locnl f i e l d co:*rection i n t he l a t t i c e dynamics of d-band metals.
Our procedure has greatly simplified the complicated method used
by O l i and Animalu (1976). The guarantee of symmetry 8t the
zone boundaries P ana H when our nmer i ca l resu l t s are compared
with experiments jus t i f ies the sound basis of our theory which
provides a c lear understanding of the interatomic forces associated
APPENDIX A ---- INVERSION O F 'lHE DTZLEC'IIHIC MATRIX
A basic problem i n the microscopic theory of screening is
t h e inversion of thrl dielectr ic matrix E'($+$, G+gt ) . We have sho
shown i n chapter 2 Sectiun 2.5 tha t the dielectr ic matrix is of
the form
which also take? th form
where
We can now carryY out a matrix expansion o f Eq. ( ~ 2 ) t o obtain the
This can be written in f'ull using Eqs . ( A ' ) and ~ 4 ) as
IBM Computer Program for the Computations of the
Born-Mayer Contribution t o tile I&namicctl Mstrix
i n bcc l ' ranci t ion Metals Vanadium, niobim and
tsntalm,
APPZm>IX C
rsM Computer Program for the Comp~Lationa of the
Electronic Contribution and T o t a l Phonon Frequencies
excludi:?g the Local field Correction i n the bcc
Transition Metals vanadium, niobium end tnntalm.
2/40 D A T E 2 0 / 3 8 / 8 1 T I E
c . ; .. ,:: 'alp5 5 . j J 2 7 d.,
?. ;<153:, 5. (322 3 J.! J. J>l??'I l . 5 1 2 7 . , .. . : 1 " 7 2 ?. f 2 6 ' : . - C. <
2.~1;~; ! J ?. j : , C ;
2 . ; . - - ..a, ,.:?
I . 913-l 2 . 3 . * 1 . \ . " - ? j 7 2 . 5 8 1 4 .'. 2 A ,. J . 2.)- 1 1 5 3 . 1 3 G 7 6 . r. ?. . ; l c ' ? 7 1 1 . 3 5 C 3 0 . 1 3 . " 2 - , 3 2 3 1.476" 2 . 3 S. CJ375l 3 . 3 9 3 4 1?. 3 ;.. J , 3 2 2 5 't. -'85!? .I . 2 C: . \ j : .. 5 4 7 " .'; r, 2 7
, . . - . _ *.' i . I , ,
. . d . . , , ; > i 5
2 .33: ) i . 2 ' 5 ; . .. 1.3 ,i' 5 , 3 2 2 l..j;L'. 1-23', x , L . L t ~
' 7 ,
1.;. 7 1,'1.3/t7 K .',a 34 . ,. j '1 A . > t ! 3 ' :. 12fi13 L . 4 2 '3 , :
. . ,? (~ 2 8 . : ' > 3 1 L 2. ; L . .2 ,.G 59 . . , : I, . -: , ' 7 2 : . J 20"31 ,.O.? i 3 ; l
: ! . O i ? R >- ' 1 >, $3 L. . 1. ;::I2 1 .:;235 3.2 7'13 . :' 745 . . - ,: 1 > - - . c ) 3 5 ' . . - ? 3 5 . ' 7 IC'..C?C;Z~ j.2212123 ,, .C 3 2 1 : Z l ; . ; t : ? ; Z . ; J > > ~ ' . f, j 6 -, 1..3',50 - . ,', ::< . . . . <,
. . . , -, . .
, ' 2 8 : ;7'! . - . J > ' : L . -. l. . ;' f~ L; . . . - c': .. . ,
. . 5 ..c [ 5 <, 7 ;. I d Z i 7 . 3 3 5 7 d. . . I : ,
, I . L i b 1 :I.!:?! .. ! . . .' . '7:,? . :.I 2 <! . . .;<6 . ' , ..,,, L / t , , , i ,. ,:.'ts> . ! I t . 3 . ' . /, '5 ,, . . ' :%L 5 . I t ) : : , . ,2b23
i . . ! ; : , I 1 1 5 . / . ' ( , $ . . , . < I . .I - -,
* & 'I 1 ( J 1 .* 1 , > r I - A i r i L . ., d , L '> ') . , 3 ; 5 0 4 1 3 ' )
. i,)':,;, . i t > / , * , i ' i : ', ;> f, ,', 7 ( t . ~ , ' ) ' - ,. . !*',r, ; . );=, -. J
, . i ' , 3 . ! / ? 5 . . . - 1 2 - 1 . \ . ' $ I ' u , . , A , . r ! I J .! ' > l 1 . 1 7 1 .. 1 ,.I? J > . :, ..I ' , 2 . 1 5 7
. . f , h . ' .',5,7'3 . . . . . , '0 " 4 . :> /, P; !, . : ;,.< . . . - < . . . A I .
. , . i . I , > . 1 ;. ;' ,{ , :; <; ", , , , j . 0,: 1 !, . , ', -: : . -
.:! ' ~ 7 , , , ' ? / . . .; ! $ , > . . . : . . . I . . .; : " I . . . . . 1 r '. . ,> . , ' . . I , . -' 1 '.. 5 ,<. , . . " , :
'. . " 3 ? . j , t . . . . . ;, . /. ,, . .". i, . , . , . I . . . 3 . :- . . , , . . . .
.; I i Z .,,I 1 ' ,..+%., : c. . '+ :, .; ,.: ; : .', I - < ; ? C ? 4 1 . 5 2 'J . . .J . , . ; ! > 4 . 3 : -; /, I ' ,
' 1 1 5 - . , . , :- ;
, ?
\ I . I , . ) . ' 1.. . . f. 5 ,' . ."- ~ 7 1.. 1 ; <'. .. ( I ' ' . >:',CI I - 5 9 1 5 . . - u.. t1 L_ . . . : .i :'iq < .Q!.?5'3 ' ' 2 " ; u.)
: . c " 3 2 s . . 75: (+ . ! 2 2 ,;. : . Z l C ' , ( , >, ,' !\ 1 . ;' f< 3 '3 5 . 4 $ 4 6 ., . . . I . Cl.0235 ". 7 5 5 I .t 5372'1 i.. - ..; ; .f ? r C 2 .. ' . . r^53h 5 . 2 5 3 3 1 . 7 ~ 2 1 2 . ' ! ,.; 7 4
3.7C06 ' . 3 3 7 C ... 3 1 . J -. , 5 . :: 6~ 2 8 . . IJ 2 !> -.-, : 3 7 3 ' . i L . 3 3.5,3r? - ' 1 5 4 ., ,) L, : 2 ? - 7 ? . , . j 2 . 5 5 5 . ) 5 . 2 1 4 5 l i . 2 ' 1 6 3 .. d ,,,. J i. i 3 .?.;?a - .' Y Z , ? . . i ?';/I '! . ; . J d . i : 3 0 G Q ,!!5L 5 . 2 4 2 2 2 - 5 12.5 ; - 'I i . 7 / ' ~ . F ! 7 f l l I 1 .'1:)71 ., . :j 9. I
, - . .) : . 1 + : + . : 2 , 1 f , . . -2 2 9; L . -:. f , 4 3 . I ,'. ? ? . T I 1.1, 23 : . 1 : .>+' , z !. : > ? / I . , . . . , I . i
% -, - -. . m : 5'7 . :.7 - . - . ; 3 . > ; - " 2: ..','I . . . ., , ; 3
. . ' r Z t . . ' ; ( .> '.. . ,?I . . L ,..I? , . , . . ' , . I437 5. 1 5 ~ / -.- -. . . . -*.. , :. . I ? ' , -, 'Ti . . -, * - . 7 -7 , , I : . # ? I 4 3 - , .,, >
. . . .',,,.. ' .%f . .v.,7.:+, 2 *
<: , ' , / , ' ~ ! . . . . . - 1 ' . > .
> : ~ - < - , .> . . , . . . . :. ': ? , >/';(, ,. : , ) ' ,
. . , . . ' . h f , : , . ,,..i& 7 % . , . -. >,.! . '.c'., . ,, - T I , : - , ' f, ;> . . . . . '. ' , I , : . / 5 F 3 . I r . , . < , , <. .', , 1: !$, ! 1 ', . ! '+ , ' 1
, i ? . ( . i ; 2 2...<-?55 . , _ . . . ~ . 1 4 ! 0 : 4 : b , *-', C 1 .: .: < > ' . , \ L ' ~ , * , , , I ';if, - - . . - , . , , - - ? / ~ ; c, . . ? h ? 3 , 15 F...-..- 'is I c 8 i ; ! 9 : "
If. . 9 5 G 3 i 7 . " F 4 . . ,.) 1 : - j ,. . 3 < . I 2 5 3 . I 1<:3 .. .,.. L:.,.J :. ;::,: 70; u.;?!?':: . .>-, , . . ~ 5 . 3 2 1 1 , . < 2 1 ? i . P 156 S . t~ ,.I 3 5 - . 5 L ? 4
31 .3907 3 ! . ' + 4 $ ? $ . . , . . . I L - 3 , ~
' 3 - 2 4 8 4 . , " ~ , y / + : .?57259 , 1 4 7 L.?51(< '+7 ' 2.32e2 . .. . , < ; 7 , .? / I . ' l 1.. I . , ,7 L .. . I . , . , . , ' I
3 5 . 1~':8-7 , , \ . I 3 4 7 l XI * a 3 i.,
: ; . 2 1 3 8 , . 2 9 3 9 ,-.3,9)!~!2 .:.,-J;l:'3 L . , < l c / 3 0.25C7 ! .%5LU ' 3 . 358 5 6 . 2 2 9 ) 6 . > ? ' $ ' 1
.3b.3!19 3i. 7 742 - a . 4; , '2 C . , . .
0 . 3 2 4 6 1. ?z:,s C:.<"ll152 f . . > C L L 3 3 ~ . , 3 : : i ' G 3 5.2C96 : . 7 : , 9 ; L:,2?5 b.,. .I J o . C ' j 5 f ,- ' , ,
4 2 . 3 2 3 2 4 2 - ; ' 3 7 C G. J 0.3 . : ~ - 7 C - 3 3 5 4 1). 3 3 5 4 C!. C>:l.iS5 0.2C 1497 O.'jCL't97
APPENDIX D
IBM Computer P r o p m for the ~onycrtatione of the
Electronic Contribution, Total Phonon ~requencies and
Local. 1 l e l d Correction i n the bcc Transition
MOid~7.s 'Vewdu~, niob-hs-81ld tantalum.
49, (2 ' > . 1 L H L
, . C1.J930 . J 4 7 4
. , 1 3 . i ' L L . i .9!JL> I
D U . 3 2 .>I.
. ! , :! J
, , ,> 4: ; . < . ,'c3 76
.>3 .L7L'< .,! i i / . b 0 > 1
,. ,., . '. 7 / !, ./227
J i . , I L
;/ . i 2 .>:; . . 1 ! I
. , G 1 : I
1 . . , i ..- . >;\!.
, , . , ; 7 k ?
. - ,/! : . .
A . ' ; ,
. . , .. , ,. ' I ,
c . , , > , .J . . I.. , - - I
t ' . .,- : l f i ;, C ' 7 ., . .. ' . ; ,;. , .:'23 ', . ,:..;$ : - . . . - ,. '5 . : . * ', 2 , . > 2 . LA..\.
I,. - . . I
. . ' - .
:!, ? ! - ; 2 . . . > .. . .. , .. '. . ,'. . . . . , . , . '
. , ~ . . : . .. .
. . a
' ! . , ; - . ., i -! 7 - -
Abarenkm, I.V. and V. Heine, Philos. Mag. 9, 451, (1964).
Aider, S .L. Phys. Rev. 126, 413 (1962).
Allen, P.B. md M.L. Cahen, Phys. Rev. 187, 525 ( 1970).
Anderson, P.W. and W e t , McWCTl.lan, Theory of Magnetism in Transition Metals, W. Marsh-;..TI, Ed. (Academic Ress, - New ~ o r & , 1 9 6 7 ) p. $0.
Animalu, A.0 .E. snd V. Heine, Philos . Mag. 12, 1249 ( 1965) . Animalu, A.O.E. -6. Rev. B. ' 8, 3542 ( 197%).
Animalu, A.O.E. Phys. Rev. B e 8, 3555 ( 1 9 7 9 ) .
Animalu, A.O.E. Phye. Rev. B. 10, 4964 (1974).
Animlu, A.O.E. Intermediate Quantum meom of Czystalline S l i d s Prentice-Hall, Inc. Eaglewood Cliff'a, New Jersey ?-! 1977a . p. 76
RnimaTu, A. 0. E. z!kcl;> hion M e t 8, Ed. M.J.G. Lee, J. M. Ferz and E. Fewcet,t, 1.1977b -7-76. , p.
Znnedek, R. W s . Rev. B 15, 2902 ( 1977)
Bertoni, C.M., V. Bortolani and C. Calandra, Phys. Rev. B 9, 1710 ( 1974).
-, ,r .,' . .- !. ,v *,c..,:i ~. . Bolef, D . I . , J. Appl. Phys. 32, 100 (1961).
Born, M and I.;, Htiang, DYnamical Theory of C r y s t a l Lattice, Oxford Thiversity Press ,( 1954.).
Born, M and Th. Von-Karman, z. physik 13, 297 (1912).
17. Brockhouse, B.N. Inelastic E c a t t e r i n ~ of Neutrons i n Solida +and Liquids ( fnternatioi~al Atomic Ihergy Agency, Vienna, 1960) p. 113.
8 Coles, B.R. and A,D. Caplin, The Electronic Structures of Solids, Edward Arnold (publishers Ltd, 25 H i l l Street , - London W X X B L ~ ( 1976 ) p. 17 . Colella, p and I3 t?. Batter 2 . -. , Phys. Rev. BI , 3913 ( 1970).
Cochran, W. Proc. Roy. Soc. A 276, 308 ( 1963).
Ehrenreich H and M.H. Cbhenn ma. Rev. 1 15, 786 1 3959).
Fielsk. B.L. J. Phys. F: Metal F%ys. 10, 1965 (1980).
Friedel, J. and A. Blsndin, 3. Phys. Rsd. 20, 160 (1959).
Gilbert, T,L. J. Chem. Phys. 49, 2640 (1968).
Gradshteyn, f ,S. and I .K. Pgzhik, Table of IntenraJg Series andr Products, Academic Press New York & London ( 3965 ) . Hanke, W ,R. Phys. Rev. B8, 4585 ( i973a).
HanRe, W.R. Phys . 3i: : . B8, 459 1 ( 1973b).
iiarrison, W.A. Pseadopotential i n the theory of Wtcils (LA. Benjamin, New York, 1966J p. 7.
, ,, . - 0 . d- . . .>,-
Harrison, W.A, Phys. Rev. 181, 1036 (1969) 6
Heine, V. Ph-j.3. Rev. 153, 674 ( 1967).
Ihine, V. aiid T.V. Abarenlcov, Philos. Mag. 9, 451 ( 1961). I ' . ..
Herring, C. Phys. Reu. 57, 1169 ( 19!30),
Huntington, H.B. Rws. Rev. 91, 1092 (1953).
Inksnn, J.C. Inst . Phys. Conf. Ser. No. 43 (1976) p. 1175.
Kohn, W, and N. Rostoker Phys. Rev. 94, 1111 (1954).
Kohn, W. R p . Ite-J. Lett. 2, 393 (1959).
Koichi, S and N. Hisashi, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 43, 899 ( 1977).
Li-ttlewood, P.B. J. Phys. C 12, 4459 (1979).
bucks , T.L. Acmented Plane Wave Metho&, W.A. Benf &n Inc., New York (1967).
Maclin, A.P. and A.O.E. Animalu, Tramition Metals Ed. M.J.G. Lee, J.M. Perz and E. Fawcett (1977).
Maradudin, A.A., E.W. M a a t r o l l . G.B. Weiss and I .P. Ipatova, Theory o f - l a t t i c e DJrn&ce in the Harmonic proxi xi mat ion, - 2nd Ed. Academic Press, New York, ( 1971).
Mayer, J.E. J. Chei. Phys. 1, 270 (1933).
Mayer, J.E. and M.E. Mayer Phys. Rev. 43, 505 (1933).
McMillan, W .L. Phys . Rev. 167, 33 1 ( 1968) . Rcgakawa, Y and A.D.B. Woods, Phys. Rev. Lett. 11, 271 ( 1963). .,,,...., r . . , . . . :. ..:r . .
Nizzoli, F. Solid State Conmntn. 22, 387 ( 1977).
Nozieres, P. and D. Pines, -8 . Rev. 11 1, 442 (1958).
O l i , B.A. and A.O.E. ~nimslu--&.s. Rev. B. 13, 2398 (1976).
53. O l i , B.A. J. Phys. F, 8, 2441 (1978).
54. O l i , B.A. J. w e . F. 11, 2007 (1981).
Oliveira, L.E. and J . C . Inkeon, J. Phys. C, 12, 5089 (1979).
Onwuagba, B.N. and A.O.E. Pnimlu, J. de Physique Colkoque ~ 6 , Suppl. au no 12, Tome 42, ~6-401 (1981).
Pal, S. Austr. J. Isiv~. 27, 471 (1974).
Philips, J. (:. and L. Kleinman, Phys . Rev. 116, 287, 880 ( 1959).
Powell, B .M., P. -el and A, '1 .B. Voods, Phys. Rev. 171 , 727 (1968); can. J. WS. 55, 1601 i1977).
Prasad, S. , S. Auluck and S.K. Joshi, J. Phye. ~6 ( 5 ) , 839 (1976).
Praskash, S. and S.K. Joshi, Phys. Rev. B 2, 915 (1970).
Schiff, L.I. Quantum Mechanias, 3rd Ed. McGraw-Hill me., (1968).
Sestz, F. The Modern_Theory of Solids, McGraw-Hill (1940)
Sham, L. J. and J.M. Ziman, Solid Sta te Pbys. 15, a21 (1963).
Sham, L.J. Proc. a. ."ac A 293, 33 ( 1965).
Shew, R.W. Jr. and W.A, Harrison, F'hys. Rev, 163, 604 (1967).
Fingh, R.S. and B.B. Tripathi, Nuovo Cimento 6413, 498 ( 1981 ).
S<nha, S.K., R,P. .G,qut~ and D.L. Price, Phys. Rev. B9, 2565 (1974).
. t 9
Slater, J.C. Phys. Rev. 51, 846 (1937).
Smith, M.V. and L.F. Mattheiss, Phys. Rev. B9, 1341 (1974).
~ t & , K . J . Phys. C, 12, 53 -f 1979).
Upadbyaya, J.C., S. Wemg &mi R.A. Moore, Can. J. o f Phys. 58, 905 ( 1 9 9 ~ ) .
Van Carnp, ?.E., V.E. Van Doren and J.T. Devreese J. PfUrS. C. 12, 3277 (1979).
Van Vechten. J ,.!I. :md R .M e Martin, ms. Rev. Lett 28, 446 (1972).
V w , C.M. and W e Weber, Phys. Rev. B e 19, 6142 (1979).
Vosko, S .H., R . Taylor snd G.H. Keech, Can* J b Phys, 13, 1187 (1965).
Weast, R.C. anrZboak of 'Chemistry and Physics. 55th Ed. Chem. Rubber Pliblishing Co . Press, Ohio, ( 19'; 4-1975) . p. F-198.
Weber, W . , P. HoZhammer, L. Pintschovins, W. Reichardt, F'. Ccnnpf and A.N. Christensen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 008 (1979).
Wiser, M. Phys. Rev 129, 62 (1963).
Woods, A.D.B. Pbys. Rev. 136, A781 ( 1964) . Ziman, J.M. *so Rev. L~tt. 8. 272 ( 1962).
Z i m , J.M. Proc. Phys. Soc. 86, 337 ( 1965). < s , . . b ' . d . . , . . i > ' .
BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE
BE3IIA.H NDUDIM ONWUAGBA hails from Nnakwe in I d d l i k c a l
Government Area of Anambra State. H e graduated B&. with Honour6
in Physics a t the V~!?vcrsity of' Nigeria, Nsukka in June 1975.
Innmediately af ter graduation, he served a year i n On& State under
the National Youth Service Corps ( A ,X.S .C. j scheme, when he became
the Senior Physics Mas ter et Doherty Memorial Gzrrnnnrtr Schol , Ijero-Ekiti. In August. 1976 he became the Senior Ph.;.sics Master
a t Federal Government G i r l s ' College Benin-City. In September
1978 he c&e t o Univprsity of Nigeria, Nsukka as the pioneer
reseasch student in Solid State Physics /Materials Science. But in
October ;YE0 he gr6duated the first M. Ph i l degree in Solid State
Fhysics/~mteria;~s Science p t t \ e Unjlversity of Nigeria, Hsukka*
fmmediately a f t e r graduation, he proceeded t o the Ph.D. degree
programs. His parents I& b Mrs ~ . b . Onwuagba are re t i red church
teachers. And he is married to Felicia Ngozi Oiwuagba and h a four , , . , ( +
children, Master Elochukwu Onwuagba, Mias Ijeoma Onwuagba,
Misa Chime Onwuagba, and Mies Ifeyinwa Onwuagba.