Fibra óptica - evolución de estándares

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    1/16

    22 Jan 2010

    Update on optical fiber and cable

    standards

    Daniel Daems

    Tyco ElectronicsBelgium

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    2/16

    Slide 2Daniel Daems March 2010

    Most relevant standardization bodies

    Leading standardization bodies for:

    Fibers: ITU-T SG15:

    G650 test method series G651 multimode 50/125 m G652 dispersion unshifted singlemode optical fiber G653 dispersion shifted singlemode optical fiber G654 cut-off shifted singlemode optical fiber G655 non-zero dispersion-shifted singlemode optical fiber

    G656 non-zero dispersion-shifted singlemode fiber for wideband optical transport G657 bending loss insensitive singlemode optical fiber

    Recent changes seen in G657 for low bend loss fibers

    FO Cables: IEC SC86A

    60793 series for fibers 60794 series for cablesRecent changes seen in patchcord cables IEC 60794-2-50

    TELCORDIA GR 20

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    3/16

    Slide 3Daniel Daems March 2010

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Why needed?

    Cable attachments with staples!?

    Corners

    Staples

    According to Verizon the radius around corners and under staples can go down to 5 mm!

    Smaller boxes and wall

    outlets with fiber bend

    radius 20 mm

    Sharp bends

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    4/16

    Slide 4Daniel Daems March 2010

    Bending loss performance of standard singlemode fiber (ITU-T G. 652D)

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Radius Loss increaseG.652 matched

    30 mm < 0.05 dB

    25 mm < 0.05 dB20 mm < 0.05 dB15 mm 0.49 dB

    10 mm 17.3 dB

    1625 nm results

    Radius 10 mm

    Radius 15 mm

    Radii 20 mm

    Spectral macrobending loss of SMF 28 fiber for 10 loops

    0

    0.4

    0.8

    1.2

    1.6

    2

    2.4

    2.8

    3.2

    3.6

    4

    1250 1300 1350 1400 1450 1500 1550 1600 1650

    Loss(indB)

    Wavelength (in nm)

    MFD (1310 nm) : 8.9m ...9.5m

    R

    Observations: Loss becomes important once bending radius becomes smaller than 20 mm Splicing trays with 25 mm and 30 mm bending radius will not affect transmission at 1625 nm

    in G. 652D fibers In some limited cases (max 2 meter) a 20 mm radius is allowed (see ITU-T L13 and IEC

    61756)

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    5/16

    Slide 5Daniel Daems March 2010

    R

    nRefractive index profile:

    Characteristics:

    General:

    Optimized bandwidth for 1310 nm transmission(= Minimum chromatic dispersion at 1310 nm)

    Lowest attenuation at 1550 nm

    Mode field diameter at 1310 nm: 9.2 m 0.4 m

    Mode field diameter at 1550 nm: 10.4 m 0.5 m

    Cladding diameter: 125 m 0.7 m

    Mode field concentricity error: 0.5 m @ 1310 nm

    1550 nm loss performance: < 0.05 dB for 100 turns

    on 50 mm mandrel diameter

    Chromatic dispersion:

    3.5 ps/(nm.km) @ 1310 nm 18 ps/(nm.km) @ 1550 nm

    Proofstress strain test: 1%Attenuation:

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    6/16

    Slide 6Daniel Daems March 2010

    R

    n

    Refractive index profile:

    Characteristics (not up-to-date!):Mode Field Diameter at 1310 nm: 8.8 m 0.5 m

    Mode field diameter at 1550 nm: 9.7 m 0.6 m

    Cladding diameter: 125 m 1.0 m

    Mode field concentricity error: 0.8 m @ 1310 nm

    PMD (fiber): 0.5 ps/km at 1310 nm

    Chromatic dispersion: 18 ps/(nm.km)at 1550 nm1550 nm loss performance: < 0.1 dB for 100 turns

    on 75 mm mandrel diameterProofstress strain test: 1%Attenuation:

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    7/16

    Slide 7Daniel Daems March 2010

    How can you improve the bending loss performance?

    Light in a waveguide is better contained when the difference of

    refractive index between the core and cladding is increased.

    This results in a better bend loss performance, but it will result in a

    lower bandwidth or transmission capacity (modal dispersion, higher

    chromatic dispersion)

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    8/16

    Slide 8Daniel Daems March 2010

    Radius

    Refractive index

    Radius

    Refractive index

    Radius

    Refractive index

    Radius

    Refractive index

    Matched claddingsinglemode fiber (standard)

    Depressedcladding singlemode fiber

    Trench assisted

    Ring assistedsinglemode fiber

    A lower refractive index can beachieved by fluor doped solid glass orby air-holes in glass

    Examples Hole Assisted Fiber (HAF):

    Betterbendlos

    sperformance

    Different low microbend loss fiber types

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    !

    The mechanical reliability remainsthe same for all these 125/250 mfibers since the cladding andcoating has not changed!

    Radius

    Refractive index

    Hole assisted

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    9/16

    Slide 9Daniel Daems March 2010

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    ITU has published in Dec 2006 a recommendation for such fibers:

    ITU-T G.657A fiber: These are G. 652D fibers with tighter dimensional tolerances

    that will result in a better optical performance during bending. These fibers are also

    known as Low Macrobend Loss fibers. The specifiedminimum bending radius for

    optical attenuation is 10 mm. Roughly 10 times better bending performance than

    traditional single-mode fiber

    ITU-T G.657B fiber: Fibers designed to have a very low loss during bending, but

    they are not always compatible with the G. 652 fibers anymore and thereforerestricted to shorter distances (associated with indoor cabling). These fibers can

    have connection and splicing problems for some types. These fibers are typically

    called Bend Tolerant Fibers. The specifiedminimum bending radius for optical

    attenuation is 7.5 mm. Roughly 100 times better bending performance than

    traditional single-mode fiber

    ITU-T G. 657 recommendation

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    10/16

    Slide 10Daniel Daems March 2010

    Installation inside houses:

    Assume cable is routed though 3 rooms on the 1st floor:

    This results in about 15x 90turns around a corner When nails or staples are used every 30 cm, about 70 staples will be used in this example.

    Assume that each staple or nail creates a bend with radius 5 mm over 15 In total 2 meter of fiber is stored in the floor distribution box and wall terminal with radius 15 mm

    7 m

    1 m

    5 m

    5 m4 m

    Total

    probability:

    2 meter

    0,1 meter

    0.125 meter

    Length fiber

    under stress

    20 x 360(15 mm)

    70 x 15(5 mm)

    15 x 90(5mm)

    Number of turns

    Boxes

    Staples

    Corners

    Item

    10-5

    3. 10-5

    8.10-6

    10-5

    Probability

    failure over 25

    years

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Mechanical reliability concerns

    Important: In this casethe estimated contribution ofbending loss will be 1 dB at1550 nm and 3 dB at 1625 nmfor a G 657 B3 fiber!

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    11/16

    Slide 11Daniel Daems March 2010

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Issues seen with bend insensitive fibers

    Some fusion splicing machines do not recognize the

    core of the new fibers and will not perform a core

    alignment (switch to cladding alignment to solve this)

    Hole assisted fiber types give problems during fusion

    splicing (unexpected and unpredictable deformations).

    Fluids may enter the holes when cleaning the fiber

    ends with alcohol

    Higher losses seen when different fiber types arespliced or connected together (mode field diameter

    mismatch with most G. 657B type fibers). Losses

    above 1 dB can be seen!

    Insertion Loss = - 10 Log10 [ 4 ( + ) ]Rt

    Rt

    RR

    - 2RR

    Rt and RR = Mode Field Radii of connected fibers

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    12/16

    Slide 12Daniel Daems March 2010

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Issues seen with bend insensitive fibers

    OTDR traces will show strange effects (gainers or higher losses) when mixing fiber

    types in connections or splices! Non-trained installers might make wrong

    conclusions about the splice loss or connector loss quality!

    OTDR652 652652652 652

    Distance

    Loss

    Distance

    Loss

    OTDR

    652 657652657 652

    Loss seems high

    Loss seems high

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    13/16

    Slide 13Daniel Daems March 2010

    IEC fiber standards

    IEC SC86A Working group 1 (fibers)

    Mainly copy of ITU-T G6xx fiber documents for the singlemode fibers, but IEC

    86A is the leader for the multimode fiber specifications.

    Fiber standards Title60793-1-1 Optical fibres - Part 1-1: Measurement methods and test procedures - General and guidance

    60793-2-10Optical fibres - Part 2-10: Product specifications - Sectional specification for category A1 multimodefibres

    60793-2-20Optical fibres - Part 2-20: Product specifications - Sectional specification for category A2 multimodefibres

    60793-2-30Optical fibres - Part 2-30: Product specifications - Sectional specification for category A3 multimode

    fibres60793-2-40

    Optical fibres - Part 2-40: Product specifications - Sectional specification for category A4 multimodefibres

    60793-2-50 Optical fibres - Part 2-50: Product specifications - Sectional specification for class B single-mode fibres

    60793-2-60Optical fibres - Part 2-60: Product specifications - Sectional specification for category C single-modeintraconnection fibres

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    14/16

    Slide 14Daniel Daems March 2010

    Cable standards Title

    60794-1-1 Optical fibre cables - Part 1-1: Generic specification - General60794-1-2 Optical fibre cables - Part 1-2: Generic specification - Basic optical cable test procedures60794-2 Optical fibre cables - Part 2: Indoor cables - Sectional specification

    60794-2-10 Optical fibre cables - Part 2-10: Indoor cables - Family specification for simplex and duplex cables60794-2-11

    Optical fibre cables - Part 2-11: Indoor cables - Detailed specification for simplex and duplex cablesfor use in premises cabling

    60794-2-20Optical fibre cables - Part 2-20: Indoor cables - Family specification for multi-fibre optical distributioncables

    60794-2-21Optical fibre cables - Part 2-21: Indoor cables - Detailed specification for multi-fibre opticaldistribution cables for use in premises cabling

    60794-2-30 Optical fibre cables - Part 2-30: Indoor cables - Family specification for ribbon cables

    60794-2-31 Optical fibre cables - Part 2-31: Indoor cables - Detailed specification for optical fibre ribbon cablesfor use in premises cabling

    60794-2-40 Optical fibre cables - Part 2-40: Indoor optical fibre cables - Family specification for A4 fibre cables

    60794-2-50Optical fibre cables - Part 2-50: Indoor cables - Family specification for simplex and duplex cablesfor use in terminated cable assemblies

    IEC SC86A Working group 3

    Leading group for cable "family specifications". In fact a set of test is

    standardized, but the severities can be freely chosen between the

    manufacturer or customer in the detail specifications. As a result, there are noreal worldwide "cable standards" existing for pigtail cables or other cables!

    IEC cable standards

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    15/16

  • 8/3/2019 Fibra ptica - evolucin de estndares

    16/16

    Slide 16Daniel Daems March 2010

    Low Optical Bend Loss Fibers

    Conclusions

    ITU-T G.657 A1 and A2 fibers are gaining market share in the distribution

    part of the network (till the wall outlet). For indoor cabling the G 657 B types

    might be considered as well. Watch out! Cable manufacturers can misuse the advantages of bend

    improved fibers for making lower quality cables! Specifications should be

    carefully updated to avoid more cable end interface issues.