Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
.•
. :.· ... ,,~
G 9?o30\'3 "'w 11 -.
F.G.E., LTD . t---~.Jti'\\ ~ .L'.;..:.:: .. :1 \
------------------~~--~~--------~--~---------------~- ... ~) Fewell Geotechnical Engineering, Ltd.
~ ··-~;;~w;;~~~;·· Hawaii •5ap ~·;>{;:'•7• File 265-9 July 21, 1982 .
Gentry-Waipio, Ltd. 94-539 Puahi Street Waipahu, Hawaii 96797
not to be taken from this room
Attention: Mr. James C. White
Subject: Final Grading Report
Gentlemen:
Gentry Waipio Industrial Subdivision First Increment, Phase 3 Gentry-Waipio Development Waipio, Oahu, Hawaii
'W At your request, we have provided testing and observation services for the mass grading of the Gentry-Waipio Industrial Subdivision, First Increment, Phase 3, in Waipio, Oahu, Hawaii.
Work started with a general clearing and stripping Of the entire construction area. Soft areas were overexcavated to firm ground, backfilled, and compacted prior to ·the start of fill placement.
Actual grading operations then commenced using Caterpillar 631 and 621 scrapers and D-9- dozers -to cut, haul, and spread--the- fill. Compaction was accomplished using a Hyster 451 sheepsfoot.
The fill was generated from. the proposed Park Site (Parcels "q" and "t") adjacent to the Puahi ·Subdivision of the Gentry-Waipio Development. The material consisted of low plasticity Clayey Silt (ML) and was placed and compacted in uniform lifts of 6 to 8 inches at moisture contents generally within 4 percent of the optimum moisture content as determined by ASTM D1557.
Field density tests performed by our firm indicated that adequate compaction was being obtained. These tests, upon which acceptimce is based, show values in excess of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by the above-referenced test. Density tests taken in the upper 24 inches of the roadway embankments showed values exceeding 95 percent relative compaction •.
Lots 1 through 19 and the roadways have either been cut or filled to final grade as designated by the field grade stakes and compacted to 90 percent relative compaction. The upper 24 inches of the roadways have been compacted to 95 percent.
' .
MUNICIPAL ~EF·E·.E· N9 ~~~S CENTER Ct~~- · ~nolulu
City~l , 58 S. King Street ~ olulu, Hawaii 90013
File 265-9 e July 21, 1982
In summary, the mass grading for the Gentry-Waipio Industrial Subdivision, First Increment, Phase 3 has been completed in general accordance with . the ·Grading Ordinances of the City and County of Honolulu and the. recommendations of our SoU Investigation Report datecl November, 1976. These lots and roadways are ready for further improvements and should be grassed as soon as practicable.
The Site Plan, Figure 1, indicates the field density test locations. The location of Parcels "q'' and "t" are shown on Figure 2. The results of the laboratory and field tests performed by our firm are summarized in Tables I and II, and graphically exhibited in Figures 3 through 6.
Should you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact us at your convenience.
Respectfully submitted,
FEWELL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, L TO.
~~n~to, P.E. Project Engineer
AJS/fse
Enclosures
Sample· Designation
A
B
c
Table I
Summary of Laboratory Test Results
Description
Reddish Brown Claye~ SICT (ML)
Reddish Brown Clayey SILT (ML)
Reddish Brown SILT (ML)
Maximum Dry Density (pcf)
103.0
105.4
100.0
Optimum Moisture Content %
23.3
24.5
27.0
File 265-9 Gentry Waipio Industrial Subdivision
First Increment, Phase 3 Gentry-Waipio Development
Waipio, Oahu, Hawaii
•,
TABLE II
e SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
Test Field Moisture Material No. Date ~cation Elevation Dens it;:£ Content Type Com.r2aption Re_marks
1.981 (pcf) (%) (%)
1 8-3 Lot #5 FG-2.0' 97 27 A 94 2 8-3 tot #2 FG-8.5' 96 26 A 93 3 8-3 Lot #6 FG-2.0~ 93 26 A 90 4 8-3 Lot #1 FG-5.5' 93 26 A 90 5 8-4 Lot #4 FG-1.0~ 94 26 A 92 6 8-4 Lot #3 FG-1.5' 95 26 A 92 7 8-4 Lot #6 FG-0.5' 93 26 A 91 8 8-5 Lot #1 FG"-5.;0 1 95 26 A 93 9 8-5 Lot #2 FG-7.0' 94 26 A 92
10 8-5 Lot #5 FG-1.0' 92 25 A 89 Accepted with ad-ditional compaction
11 8-5 Lot #4 FG-2.0' 94 27 A 91 12 8-5 Lot #3 FG--2.5' 97 23 A 94 13 8-6 Lot #7 East FG-2.0' 97 26 A 94 14 8-6 Lot #8 East FG-2.0 1 95 26 A 92 15 8-6 Lot #7 West FG-1.5' 93 26 A 90 16 8-6 Lot #8 West FG-2.0' 95 26 A 92 17 8-6 Lot #7 East FG-0.5' 94 26 A 91
-18· 8-6 Lot #8 East FG-1.5' 91 27 A 89 Accepted with ad-ditional compaction
19 8-7 Lot #1 North FG-4.0' 94 25 A 91 20 8-7 Lot #1 South FG-3.5' 96 26 A 93 21 8-7 Lot #2 North FG-6.5 1 95 27 A 92 22 8-7 Lot #2 South FG-6.0 1 94 26 A 91 23 8-7 Lot #1 South FG-3.0' 95 27 A 92 24 8~10 Lot #1 FG-2.0' 97 27 A 94 25 8,.-10 Lot #2 FG-5.0' 95 25 A 92 26 9..,10 Lot #3 FG-3.0' 94 24 A 91 27 a..,1o Lot #1 FG-1.0 I 95 26 A 92 28 8-10 Lot #2 FG-4.0 1 96 26 A 93 29 8-10 Lot #2 FG...,4.0' 98 24 A 95 30 8-11 Lot #2 FG-3.0' 96 27 A 93 31 8-11 Lot #3 FG-3.0' 96 25 A 93 32 8-11 Lot #2 FG-2.0' 94 26 A 91 33 8-11 Lot #3 FG-1.5' 95 27 A 93 34 8-11 Lot #2 FG-1.0' 99 25 A 96 35 8-11 Lot #3 FG 99 24 A 96 36 8-12 Lot #2 FG 97 26 A 94 37 8-12 Lot #5 FG-1.5 I 98 26 A 95 38 8-12 Lot #4 FG-1.0 1 100 27 A 97 39 8-12 Lot #5 FG-1.0' 94 26 A 92 40 8-12 Lot #6 FG 0.5' 98 25 A 95 41 8-12 Lot #5 FG 94 26 A 91
-42 8-12 Lot #4 FG 96 23 A 94 43 8-13 Lot #6 FG 98 25 A 95 44 8-13 Lot #5 FG ·. 93 26 A 90 45 8-13 Lot #6 FG 97 25 A 94
TAaLE II (cont'd)
SUMMARY OF FIELD DENSITY TEST RESULTS
e Test Field Moisture Material No. Date Location Elevation Densitx Content Ty,J2e Com.12action. Remarks
1981 (pcf) (!is) . (\)
' 46 8-13 Lot #5 FG 100 24 A . 98
47 8-14 Lot #14 FG-5.0 1 . 96 27 A 93 48 8-14 Lot #15 FG-5.0 1 .95 25 A 92 49 8-14 Lot #13 FG-4.0 1 92 26 A 89 Accepted with ad-
'. di tiona! compactior
so 8-14 Lot #16 FG-4.0' 93 27 A 90 51 8-14 Lot #14 FG-3.0' 96 26 A 95 52 8-14 Lot #15 FG-3.0 1 99 24 A 96 53 8-17 Lot #14 FG-2.Q 1 96 25 A 93 54 8-17 Lot #16 FG-3.0 1 98 27 A '95 55. 8-17 Lot #13 FG-1~0' 97 26 B '·92
56 8-17 Lot #15 FG-2.0 1 94 27 B . 90 57 8-17 Lot #14 FG .. 102 25 B . \'97
58 8-17 Lot #13 FG 101 24 B '96
59 8-18 Lot #15 FG-1.5 1 99 25 B 94 60 8-18 Lot #16. FG-2.0 1 100 24 B 95 61 8-18 Lot #13 FG 97 25 B 92 62 8-18 Lot #14 FG 99 24 B 94 63 8-18 Lot #15 FG-0.5' 102 25 A. 98
• 8-19 Lot #16 FG-1.5 1 101 27 A 98 8-19 Lot #15 FG 97 24 A 9~
66 8-19 Lot #15 FG 96 23 A . 93 67 8-19 Lot #16 FG-1.0' 98 25 A ·. 95 68 8-19 Lot #16 FG-0.5 1 106 24 .A 100+ 69 8-19 Lot #16 FG 99 23 A 96 70 8-20 Lot #17 FG-5.0 1 97 23 .A .94
71 8-20 Lot #17 FG-4.5' 99 24 A 96 72 8-20 Lot #17 FG-3.5 1 1G2 23 A 99 73 8-20 Lot #18 FG-2.0' 97 25 A 95 74 8-20 Lot #18 FG-1.0 1 95 24 •A 92 75 8-21 Lot #18 FG 101 25 B 96 76 8-21 Lot #18 FG 97 26 B 92 77 8-21 Lot #17 FG-3.0' 100 24 A -97 78 8-21 Lot #17 FG-2.0 1 94 24 A 92 79 8-21 Lot #17 FG-1.0 1 96 23 A 93 80 8-21 Lot #17 FG-1.0' 99 25 B 94 81 8-21 Lot #17 FG 103 25 B '97 82 8-21 Lot #17 FG 101 24 B 96 83 8-25 Ukee st. Ext. FSG-1.0' 101 25 A 98 84 8-25 Ukee St. Ext. FSG-1.0'· 101 24 A 98 85 8-25 Ukee St. Ext. FSG,.,.l.S' 101 25 A 99 861r ~-1 Lot #12 FG-1.0' 99 25 A 96
Warehouse Area 87*•· . 9-1 Lot #14 FG-0.5' ,99 27 A 96
-~ Warehouse Area
.. 9.:....16' .. •.Lot.#17 FG 102 23 A 99 · Warehouse Area
*Test No's 86 through 89 were taken during the individual Lot Grading of Lots 12, 14, 16, and 17 after the completion of the original mass grading of these lots.
-est No's 293, 296, and 300 were taken during the revised grading for R~ad "D" during the installation of the utilities ~d site improvements (FGE, Ltd. File 265-91).
File 265-9 Gentry Waipio Industrial Subdivision
First Increrilent, Phase 3 Ge~try-Waipio Development
Waipio, Oahu, Hawaii
><( 3: :I: 0 :I: <( :I: w :!!: <( :I: w ~ <( ~
·'
LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
SUBDIVISION
KA UKA BOULEVARD
LELEPUA SUBDIVISION
CENTRY-WA SUBDIVISIO PHASE 3
><(
== w w ~ u. N I
:I:
ENT,
PENAKII CLUSTER
:PROJECT LOCATION-MAP ..
MIKILANA SUBDIVISION
~ Borrow Site Location
--~-
CRESTVIEW SUBDIVISION
GENTRY-"WAIPIO DEVELOPMENT
•'
File 265-9 Fjgure 2
l:;ABORAT9R'( COMPA_CTION CURVE
110 -. ,.._ . u . Q. -> f- 100 Cl) z w c > ex: c
90
15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT - (%of Dry Weight)
Sample: Bag "A"
Description: Reddish Brown Clayey SILT (ML)
Laboratory Test Procedure: ASTM 01557
Maximum Dry Density: 103. 0 pcf
Optimum Moisture Content: 23. 3 %
File 265-9 Figure 3
LABPRATORY COMP~CTION CURVE
110 -~ . u . a. ->- 100 .... (/) z IJ w c >-" c 90
15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT ,.. (%of Dry Weight)
Sample: Bag "6''
Description: Reddish Brown Clayey SILT (ML)
Laboratory Test Proc:;:edure: AS TM D 1 557
Maximum Dry Density: 105~ q pcf
Optimum Moisture Content: 24. 5 %
.,
File 265-9 Figure q
. ·.
LABORATORY COMPACTION CURVE
110 -. 16-. u . a. ->
1- 100 Cl) z w c > 0::: c
90
15 20 25 30
MOISTURE CONTENT '- (%of Dry Weight)
Sample: Bag •ic••
Description: Reddish Brown SILT (ML)
Laboratory Test Procedure: ASTM 01557
Maximum Dry Density: 100.0 pcf
Optimum Moisture Content: 27. 0 %
File 265-9 Figure 5
..
1-a!
c(
:I: u >-1-u 1-C
/) c(
...J a.
,, r
. &
n .... ' -
r\ \ -.
.. , c::: :J
1'\ c(
" \~
--
\ ::J: u 1'\ '
0 &n
r\. \ '\ i\ \ 1\. \ '\ d
t.n N
PL
AS
TIC
ITY
IND
EX
:I: 0 &
I)
:I: ~
<C
I\. ~~ u
\ •
l 1'\
a J c5 &I)
1\ ...J ~
\ ~
N
.....
0 0 .....
r.n .... 0 r.n
r.n N
1-~
...J
0 ::::> 0 ...J
File
~65-9
Fig
ure 6
:;
i
I
'f i /') I ,
I
/
l
~~-~ n - ~-~.,.__,_--r •4 PAD 1 . -...._, . I
M .s • 19 • 24
H 0 20 023 · I 0 21
I L
o2 0 23
0 21
o28 • 9 PAD 2
0 29 0 32
0 12
o35
022
PAD 3 33
0 •6 026
031
---------------
50 .,o 11
PAD 4 °
• :46·
0 30
~NORTH -_- ~:::so•
Limit of ...--.............._~ Grading=:\
-~~.' , r"--~ I PAD 10
PAD 13 PAD 11
I 0 61
0 55
049 -'I o48
0 58 63
65e •
PAD 12 57ee 47
eB6 o54
0 39
PAD 5 37
0 044 0 10 0 41
eB7
.• 51 62 . '
• 53
060 1 ~:~ ,_.so .. /: .·. " PAD 16
0 13 015
7
45 ___ _ _ _ _ _}/1. • • ----- :------ -= ""~----I ---- -------- ---------
--- --- - - - - - - -------11 ----- -- -------90--
------- 296.
\1
--~- I "/-J - - -.r ~;.:~ ;;,.;<.- _ . _____ _. {
;;;s..- ..--- :r -- 1~
"
PAD 6 e3
0 40 0 43 91 •
0 79
'·I
il I
FEWELL GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING, LTD.
GENTRY-WAIPIO INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION FIRST INCREMENT, PHASE 3
WAIPIO, OAHU, HAWAII
Site and Field Density Test Location Plan
FILE 265-9 JULY 1982
FIGURE 1
LEGEND:
• FGE Field Density Test Location
. -
REF: Grading Plan by ·Park Engineering, Inc.
" o77 l '
072 ' \ \
\ PAD 17. 1oso
II
• 78 I :_ .. \ • 75 ' 1 . \ : PAD 18 \· ~ F~~ wide · . • 71 : 81 ' •76 . . Jme easemOn~ommun•cations
I • ' .oae~'""'•. ~·
ess----= _,,_......,-~ ~- - ~- . -----+-- _.___I' _...,.- -I r \
PAD 19
-I• J I·
j:
., I' I I I
. ~ . . ~ . . . . \
.it ,.,..·
I
.I Ill
. :...-:...-:..: _ _:._·_·. -~~---'·~·---·-·-·-- .,_,....,..,..,..._........,._.._.,_ .. _.....,~, .. -._,..,...,.._'""'...,..,._ __ .. ~,.,..,_..,___ r----. --~~-~....-..,...,..,...,; ....... ..-"l:'.,.~"""'..,._,...,~~=z~~~~.=":.:i<:"3"~Z:"'""=::::-.::::.r.~-.....=:~~~:"·~-·~J--""?'"-~·:a-~"'~'---:""'~-'...-. ....,.,..,.,.l'..,..,... . .,..~ ,. ... l'""".""":'f<"'""· ·•..-.··" - -~'l"?"/"="1" ··~""·-ll'>•~~· .,.~- •.• ~ ..... ~-··~····ll-- ~-··- .............. ~· ~-····--·..:JI"
.""""' ... C7l c: ·-'-z c ·-(71 c Gl
.JC '-
&.
Suite 2085, Pacific Trade Center 0 190 s: King Stre~.t,::H€1~\J)Ib Hawaii 96813 0 Telephone (808) 531-1676 ~ ,t··il~ r.~.·~.\~1 "-,l ''."-:.:! .
August 2, 1982
Dr. Michael J. Chun Director and Chief Engineer Department of Public Works City and County of Honolulu Honolulu, Hawaii 96813
.; , ·t . ,_, r- ;:. , .• , r. , 1 . ·•. r ~ ,. '1 .. ' -, ¥ - • : ' ' ~. I.' , ; . : .'
Attention: Division of Engineering
Dear Dr. Chun:
Subject: Gentry-Waipio Industrial Subdivision First Increment Phase 3 Tax Map Key: 9-4-06: 8 & 13
-i r'.J
I
This is to certify that grading within the subject subdivision have been completed and substantially conforms to elevations as shown on grading plan.
Attached is Final Grading Report by G.G.E., Ltd.
Sincerely yours,
rna
Attachment
cc: Gentry Waipio, Ltd. Royal Contracting Co., Ltd. F • G • E • , Ltd •
ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS, PLANNERS, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
).:~~:·:..1 0 .::: rr. (;".) ---; (..;>_, 0 .., :;o
N -o~ c:: .... ,
.0 Cl:' :_
\.J'l r< -..,: c-~,....,
-o _,
:X: ~ 0 - ;;c
0:) ~ . ,._, en