FGCS 60 % PDMS Model Review Report

8/10/2019 FGCS 60 % PDMS Model Review Report

1/14

Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

PDMS Model Review Report

FGCS & CO2 Blending Skid

Champion Compression Upgrade Project

AUTHOR: Siemens Pte Ltd

OWNER:

runei Shell Petroleum Company Sdn hd

Project Document No

XXXXX

REV

01

Classification Restricted

Doc. Type: Model Review

Report


2/14


Document Title: PDMS Model Review Report Revision: XXDoc Number: XXX Rev Date: XX

Page 2 of 14

Signatures

Revision Record

Party Ref Ind Name Sign Date

Author s) XXX XXX

Checker XXX XXX

Approver XXX XXX

Rev. Issue Status Description / Reason for Update Date

01 IFC Issued for CommentsXXXX


3/14



Page 3 of 14

Distribution

The document owner is responsible for distribution control. The original electronic version is stored inLiveLink and accessible via BSP OnLine web site. Paper copies are only controlled if they are physicallystamped Controlled Hard Copy and signed by the related remote location document controllerDocument Control (BSP-02-Procedure-001)

Notice and Warning

Copyright 2013, Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad

This document is the property of Brunei Shell Petroleum Company Sendirian Berhad (BSP), SeriaKB3534, Negara Brunei Darussalam. Circulation is restricted to BSP and its designated associates,contractors and consultants. It must not be copied or used for any other purpose other than which it issupplied, without the expressed written authority of BSP.

Except where provided for purposes of contractual requirements, BSP disclaims any responsibility orliability for any use or misuse of the document by any person and makes no warranty as to the accuracyor suitability of the information to any third party. Any misuse of the document is redressable by BSP.
http://sww-livelink.bsp.shell.bn/livelink/llisapi.dll/open/211108http://sww-livelink.bsp.shell.bn/livelink/llisapi.dll/open/211108http://sww-livelink.bsp.shell.bn/livelink/llisapi.dll/open/211108


4/14



Page 4 of 14

Table of Contents

Table of Contents ....................................................................................................... 41. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................... 52. BACKGROUND .................................................................................................. 53. REFERENCES ................................................................................................... 64. 70% MODEL REVIEW COMMENTS (DURING CD) ......... Error! Bookmark notdefined.5. 30% MODEL REVIEW COMMENTS (DURING CD) ......... Error! Bookmark notdefined.6. 3D-CAD MODEL CHECKLIST (DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen) ................................... 127. CONCLUSION .................................................................................................. 14


5/14



Page 5 of 14

1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This document represents 30% model review of Compression module for detail design. This

is a summarized report of 30% and 70% model review workshop held during conceptual

design stage with BSP team.

2. BACKGROUND

The Champion Compression Upgrade project is a reliability driven project in which the

existing compression capacity on champion 7 complex which consists of 6 GTs will be

replaced by 2 new compressors. In order to do this a new 8 legged platform will be installedwith utility deck, flare system and crane on which two compression modules will be placed.

The new compression platform CPCC07 will be located on the North side of CPGP07 and will

be connected to the existing champion 7 infrastructure via bridge link to CPGP07.

Figure 1 Overview Champion 7 complex

The compression modules will comprise of two gas turbines (LM2500) which will drive two,

three stage, compressors. All related process equipment like scrubbers, coolers and utility

systems for the module like lube-oil system will be contained within the modules.

The conceptual design for the jacket, utility deck and bridge has been executed in-house

BSP by AED department. The conceptual design for the compression modules will be

completed by Siemens.

The main objectives of the project are:

Restore production uptime to Top Quartile levels


6/14



Page 6 of 14

Reduce Opex on existing machines and keep the current system fit for operations

longer (avoiding obsolescence and Capex upgrade projects)

Increase offshore effective compression effective capacity from current levels to cater

for future projects in East.

3. REFERENCES

Reference Documents

Number / Identification Title

- Add UEFS- Add all GA drgs of Vessels

4. 60% Model Review Comments

Model SnapSIEMENS/ BSPComments

Actionby ROS Response Remarks

1

Stairs & Interconn.Platforms areloose shipped.Required handlingprovisions to beprovided forconnecting theloose pipes

Siemen

s

2

Ladders locatedon north & southdirection of theskid has to be re-located due toclash with existingbracing

Siemen

s


7/14



Page 7 of 14

3

Tapping for CO2Analyzer has tobe relocated

following UEFSNote.7(5Dupstream & 2Dminimum straightlength)

Siemens

4

Provide access forflow indicators ofCO2 analyzerFICA-1001 &FICA-1002

Siemen

s

Dresser RandConfirmed that

NitrogenPressure 180Barg for water

mist package isacceptable.

5

Extend A-7410platform @ 3m tothe edge of SkidA-7400 to provideaccess toinstruments

Siemen

sNoted.

6

Process to ensurethe minimumstraight lengthrequirement forCo2 Analyzer is

modeled

Siemen

sNoted.

7

Re-locate thesampling valve toaccessiblelocation

Siemen

s

8mm thick roofplate will be used

8

Manual samplingpoint for allanalyzers has tobe modeled based

on Hazoprecommendation

BSP

9

Flare Tie-Ins hasto be re-locatedbased on thecomments

Siemen

sNoted


8/14



Page 8 of 14

10

Locate Tie-In TP-

326 from 74UZV-1005 to FlareHeader

To

Siemen

s

Noted.

11

Model the bleedmanual valve inbetween BAFF-219 &BAFF-218

Siemen

s

Noted. Alreadydiscussed and

clarified with BSPStructural

Engineer Eko

12

Reduce theelevation of74UZV-1005 toaccessiblelocation

Siemen

s

Submitted.

13

Branch out theBDV line 50-B74001-63831-NNfrom common line

Siemen

sNoted.

14

Relocatespectacle blind

SB-201 based onHazoprecommendation

Sie

mens Attached.

15

Based on model,the orientation ofGearbox BAFF-209 shall beconfirmed with theVendor

BSP

Provided in thelatest Platform,Staircase and

LadderArrangement

Drawing


9/14



Page 9 of 14

16Model theWalkway withvolume

Siemen

sINFO

17

Update model of74UZV-1101 valveas per actual valvetype

Siemen

sNoted.

18Model the actuatorof valve 74UZV-1101

Siemen

s

Noted duringdetail design.

19All the cableladders shall bemodeled

20

Consider space &model theTerminal Box forboth Heaters

21Model the JBLighting & small

power

22

ROS to inform Ex-heat on thelocations of HeaterThermocouples

23

Check thefeasibility toreduce the unusedspace 600mm betthe Pre-Heater to


10/14



Page 10 of 14

the edge of skid

24Model J-T valve toactual dimensions

25

Increase theelevation of pipeto accommodatethe Piping support& gratingthickness

26

Model the

supports as perBSP standards

27Model PCV-1101as per piping spec

28

Model Filternozzles based onlatest Filter GAdrg.

29Model all levelnozzles in the filter

30

Relief Vent nozzleshall be updatedin the Filter GAdrg & UEFS resp.

31Provide Fuel gasfilter separator

Internal detail drgs

32

Model QOC ofFilter separatorbased on actualdimensions

33Update Temp.transmitter modelto Coriolis type


11/14



Page 11 of 14

34Model slopewhereverapplicable

35

Model BDVbypass line 50-B74110-13451-NNas per UEFS

36Update UEFSbased on latestpipe routing

37Model Filter drainnozzle N3 based

on Filter GA drg

38Update actuatormodel based onBettis catalogue

39

Check DEP toprovide the accesshole at the filtervessel skirt

40

Lifting lugs for

Vessel has to bemodeled

41Model drain valveof Instrument air atthe lowest point

42As per BSPstandards, Drippan shall be SS

43Provide Tie-in forCO2 Analyzervent to flare


12/14



Page 12 of 14

Additional points- 3 elbows provided for CO2 analyzer apart from minimum straight length requirement. If actual

straight length is more than minimum straight length, then the elbows can be eliminated.

- CO2 analyzer venting tie-in point to be shown in model & P&ID- CO2 analyzer should be able to isolate for maintenance. To confirm whether 74QIA-1001 /

1002 have any internal sampling point (18-07 hazop recommendation)

- Instrument air supply to CO2 analyzers to be shown in model & P&ID- 74UZV-1005 outlet TP-326 connected wrongly to flare sub header. This should be an

independent tie-in. To be updated in model.- 74UZV-1005 inlet isolation and bleed valve to be shown as per P&ID- 74UZV-1005 tapping to be on the common line before distributing to two skids- To indicate nozzle number for filter separator RV tapping in P&ID. RV tapping should be just

below the top compartment

- All nozzles for filter separator should be rechecked in model. P&ID, GA drawing and model tobe consistent.

- Top liquid outlet nozzle should be taken from top compartment, model shown wrongly.- Superheater outlet flowmeter to be updated as Coriolis in model & P&ID- All shutdown valves symbol to be updated in model with actuator.- 74UZV-1201 bypass tapping to be taken from BDV inlet line, bypass outlet can be connected

to flare header if not possible to connect to BDV outlet line. P&ID to be updated.

- All PSV / BDV outlet lines to flare header to be updated in P&ID as per model routing

- Maintenance drain from equipments to closed drain header to be updated in P&ID as per

model routing- Isolation valve at closed drain header TP-314 to be confirmed. General Hazop

recommendation for all nodes

- Preheater / Superheater local start / stop switches to be provided and updated in P&ID. Iflocal stop is provided, how emergency local stop is different from normal local stop. Two localstop button may not be required. P&ID to be updated accordingly

- Flare should have three TP points, TP-326, TP-310 & TP-410 in model to connecting flareheader.

5. 3D-CAD MODEL CHECKLIST (DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen)This are the checkpoints are given for the review of a 3D-CAD block model in DEP 30.10.05.11-Gen.

The checklist will help to improve quality and to identify and eliminate potentially hazardous

situations.

The checklist has been filled-in by SIEMENS in consultation with BSP piping Lead.

5.5.2 Overall site plan


13/14



Page 13 of 14

General Layout considerations Y N NA Remark

5.5.2.1 Is the proposed set-up logical and optimal with respectto process integration?

5.5.2.2 Are roads properly defined with respect to their logicalapproach to unit(s)? Consider also the Movements area,including its marine location and rail and roadconnections. Include road dimensions, considering mainroads (unrestricted) and restricted access roads.

5.5.2.3 Is erection possible during construction: furnaces,columns, large vessels, reactors, air-cooled heatexchanger structures, flare header and flare plot?

5.5.2.4 Have area classification requirements been taken intoaccount?

5.5.2.5 Is the location of the Utilities area logical and optimal inrelation to the process units?

5.5.2.6 Is the location of the Movements area logical andoptimal in relation to the process units?

5.5.2.7 Is the prevailing wind direction considered in relation tothe location of tank farms, LPG storage or gas plants,buildings, stacks, flare and oil collecting systems, likesewers, oil catcher basins, air cooler banks and areascontaining H2S or HF?

Asapplicable

5.5.2.8 Has a sterile area been provided around the flare stack?

5.5.2.9 Have appropriate separation distances been taken intoaccount between units, storage areas and buildings aswell as public fences?

5.5.2.10 Have interfaces for future extensions been considered?

5.5.2.11 Have main maintenance and storage areas been takeninto account?

5.5.2.12 Have existing underground obstructions been identifiedand implemented in the model

5.5.2.13 Has demolition scope been indicated in the layout

5.5.2.14 ave main crane locations and lifting paths been indicatedin the model

Lifting pathfor

compressionModule

5.5.2.15 Are the battery limit locations been identified and/ or anymajor interface connection (i.e. large cool water lines,firewater lines, etc.)


14/14



Page 14 of 14

5.5.3 Process Units

General Layout considerations Y N NA

5.5.3.1 Have separation distances within the plot area been taken into account?Consider furnace, column, main equipment, flare, any vent outlet to 'safelocation', oil collecting area like sewers

5.5.3.2 Is the routing of the main piping in bridges and via trenches defined?

5.5.3.3 Is the location of the battery limit specified (by unit or complex)?

5.5.3.4 Is a maintenance area available e.g. for pulling of heat exchangers bundles?

5.5.3.5 Is a maintenance area available for furnace tube pulling?

5.5.3.6 Is a maintenance area available for removal of large pieces of rotatingequipment such as compressors or gas turbines? Is a protective compressorbuilding required?

5.5.3.7 Are there sufficient maintenance access ways available towards large aircoolers

5.5.3.8 Is the area sufficient for e.g. catalyst or solid handling activities?

5.5.3.9 Is the paving designed to support heavy equipment and cranes?

5.5.3.10 Is sufficient lay down area available?

6. CONCLUSION

The 30% model review comments (Summarized of 30% & 70% during CD) are updated as required

and all comments are closed.

The model will be updated based on the detail design developments and model review with BSP

team.