Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Fer van de Laar
Managing Director IAPH
WPCI Director
• Promoting development of international port and maritime
industry
• Representing port industry’s interests
• Collecting, analyzing, exchanging and distributing information
on developing trends
• 200 Regular Members (Ports) in 90 countries
• Handling 7 billion tons of cargo
• 60 % of world sea-borne trade
• 90% of world container traffic
• 150 Associate Members
• Offices in Tokyo / Japan and Rotterdam / Europe
World Ports Climate Initiative
• Houston May 2007
IAPH Resolution: Clean Air Program
• Dunkirk April 2008
IAPH Resolution: Support for Climate Challenges
• Rotterdam July 2008
World Port Climate Conference: World Ports Climate Declaration
• Los Angeles November 2008
IAPH Port Environment Committee Symposium:
World Ports Climate Initiative (WPCI)
Some Facts
WPCI Organization And Cooperation
Regional port branch organizations
AAPA ESPO PAPC
IAPH
WPCI bureau
Director Fer van de Laar
OPSGothenburg
ESIRotterdam
CFPLos Angeles
LNGAntwerp
Current Projects
• Carbon Foot Print CFP Los Angeles
• On-shore Power Supply OPS Gothenburg
• Environmental Ship Index ESI Rotterdam
• LNG as a fuel LNG Antwerp
Carbon Foot Printing
Future Developments
Global Logistics Emission Council
(Smart Freight Centre)
• Create a universal and transparent framework for
calculating logistics emissions across the global multi-
modal supply chain equipment, container trains and
container trucks
• ISO International Workshop Agreement (IWA) on the
developement of “International harmonized method(s)
for quantification of CO2 emissions of freight
transport”
EEOI ={Mass HFO (mt) x 3.42} + {Mass MDO (mt) x 3.26} x 106
g CO2 / tonne.nMDistance (nM) x Displacement (mt)
Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator
FOR EACH TRIP
Some thoughts
Current Projects
• Carbon Foot Print CFP Los Angeles
• On-shore Power Supply OPS Gothenburg
• Environmental Ship Index ESI Rotterdam
• LNG as a fuel LNG Antwerp
AKA’s
• Shore-side electricity
• Shore-connected electricity supply
• Shore power
• Ship-to-shore power
• Cold ironing
• Alternative Maritime Power (AMP)
• e-Shore
Onshore Power Supply (OPS)
Technology
OPS replaces power generated onboard from diesel
auxiliary engines with electricity generated on
shore (high voltage)
Technology 4 Steps
SIEMENS
Receive Adapt/convert Supply Adapt & distribute
Technology
BASICS
• Simple plug-in connection from the shore side with
interlocking to prevent the plug-in connection from being
opened during operation
• Personal safety is guaranteed by a safe interlocking
system
• Connection is automated, so that people without special
training can operate it safely; mooring personel must be
able to make the connection
Technology
BASICS
• Automatic start-up of the on-shore power supply
released by the ship when the plug-in connection is
ready
• The ship keeps the command over the shore side power
supply; it controls start and stop and synchronisation
• Control of different frequencies from the shore side to
the ship side (50 – 60 Hz) for different kinds of ships
Pros.
• Major reductions in local emissions (air pollutants and
greenhouse gases)
• Reductions in noise levels (improves working and living
conditions)
• Reductions in vibration levels (improves working and
living conditions)
• Improvement in license to operate and company image
Cons.
• The emission reductions are only achieved when a
ship is at berth
• Electrical frequencies differ between regions
• Different systems have and are being installed
• Implementation of OPS requires large investments on
the quay and on the ship
State Of The Art
Ports High Voltage (selection)
• Gothenburg, Lübeck, Zeebruges, Ro/ro and/or Ferries
Kotka, Kemi, Oulu, Rotterdam
• Juneau, Seattle Cruise
• Antwerp, Port of Los Angeles Container, Cruise
• Port of Long Beach Tanker
• Oakland, San Diego ...
State Of The Art
Ship owner / manager / charterer (selection)
NYK, China Shipping, Evergreen, MOL, YM, Princess
Cruise, HAL, Stena Line, Stora Enso, Wagenborg,
Trans Atlantic, TransLumi, Cobelfret, ICL, IMT, Color
Line…
Suppliers
ABB, ESL, Cavotec, Siemens, SAM, Terasaki, Patton &
Cooke, Schneider, Callenberg Engineering, NG3 ....
ISO / IEC / IEEE 80005-1
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD
Utility connection in port-
Part 1: High-Voltage Shore Connection (HVSC) Systems)
General Requirements
Published on 5 July 2012
Standards
ISO International Organization for Standardization
IEC International Electro-technical Committee
IEEE Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers
www.onshorepowersuply.org
www.ops.wpci.nl
OPS Website
Current Projects
• Carbon Foot Print CFP Los Angeles
• On-shore Power Supply OPS Gothenburg
• Environmental Ship Index ESI Rotterdam
• LNG as a fuel LNG Antwerp
• To reduce emissions of seagoing ships below mandatory
levels, ports and others provide financial incentives to Ship
Owners
• Ports don’t charter ships and can’t show their preference
for certain ships in that way
• Areas of applicability are in and around ports and - to a
lesser extent - also on the oceans
ESI
ESI
• The program is free of charge for all ships that participate
- actually it brings financial rewards – and is applicable for
all types of ships
• Over 4 000 ships participate ranging from the smallest
coastal vessel, thru container ships, LNG carriers, self
propelled sheer legs to the largest ships afloat
• The ports each apply their own incentive program with
different ESI Score settings for their incentive program to
be applied – most ports however hover around ESI scores
from 20 to 30
ESI• The ESI Formula expresses the reduction of mandatory
values of NOx emissions and sulphur content in a
simple 0 to 100 points scale – the ESI Score – where 0
stands for no reduction at all (compliance with regs.)
and 100 for complete reduction to zero of all emissions
• A fixed bonus for bonus for monitoring and reporting
of data to eventually measure reduction of CO2 has
been included in 2013
• Data entered by self declaration; no requirement for
any data to be verified or certified by third parties; the
data provided are randomly checked for
inconsistencies and for obvious mistakes
ESI Scores > 20
ESI Statistics
1 APRIL 2016
ESI score > 50 (selection)
• SKANDI VEGA 99.9 PSV SCR MGO OPS
• STAVANGERFJORD 87.0 PAX FERRY SCR LNG fuel
• FUJI LNG 75.4 TANKER LNG carrier
• KVITNOS 75.3 RO RO SCR LNG fuel
• STENA SCANDINAVICA 73.3 PAX FERRY SCR METHANOL OPS
• CORAL ANTHELIA 71.0 TANKER LNG fuel
• TIMBUS 64.1 GENERAL CARGO SCR HFO MGO
• CELEBRITY CONSTELLATION 56.4 CRUISE HFO MGO
• HANJIN BOSAL 55.4 CONTAINER HFO MGO OPS
ESI Ships
ESI
• On entering an ESI-Port, the ship may inform that port
of its participation in ESI
• The port may then apply incentives for clean shipping
Whenever a port so wishes
• it can verify the ESI and may check the data on board
the ship and report the results to the ESI administration
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (1)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Amsterdam > 20 ~ 6 % reduction in port dues
Rotterdam > 31 ~ 10 % reduction in port dues
or best 25 + NOx bonus
Oslo > 25 20 % reduction in port dues
> 50 40 % reduction in port dues
Antwerp > 31 ~ 10 % reduction in port dues
or best 25
Hamburg > 20 ~ 10 % reduction in port dues
ACTIVE PORTS (2)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Green Award(GA) ESI ships obtain extra GA points
Bremen / > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
Bremerhaven > 31 10 % reduction in port dues
Kiel > 30 10 % reduction in port dues
Zeebrugge > 20 10 % reduction in port dues
Groningen > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
Le Havre > 20 10 % reduction in port dues
ESI
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (3)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Brunsbüttel 20 - 31 5 % reduction in port dues
(max. € 750)
> 31 10 % reduction in port dues
(max. € 1 000)
Los Angeles > 30 US $ 750 per call
> 35 US $ 1000 per call
> 40 US $ 1250 per call
Ashdod > 31 non disclosed financial incentive
JadeWeser > 31 5 % reduction on port dues
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (4)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Tata Steel NL > 20 scaled reduction in port dues
Rightship ESI ships obtain extra Rightship points
New York/ > 15 US $ 1500 per call (add 5 VSR points)
New Jersey > 25 US $ 2500 per call (add 5 VSR points)
Ghent > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
> 30 10 % reduction in port dues
Zeeland ESI score2 / 1000 =
Seaports x % reduction in port dues
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (5)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Port Metro > 20 23 % reduction in port dues
Vancouver > 30 35 % reduction in port dues
Setubal > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
Civitavecchia 0.1 - 30 scaled reduction of waste collection
fees
Prince Rupert > 20 10 % reduction in port dues
Port Authority > 31 20 % reduction in port dues
Port of Paris financial incentive (info on request)
ACTIVE PORTS (6)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Port of Setubal > 30 3 % reduction in port dues
Port of Rouen > 25 10 % reduction in port dues
Port of Rostock > 20 3 % reduction in port dues
Port of Sohar > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
Ports of North 20 - 30 2.5 % reduction in port dues
West Germany 31 - 50 5 % reduction in port dues
> 50 10 % reduction in port dues
Port of Busan > 31 15 % reduction in port dues
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (7)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Atlantic Port 20 - 30 10 % reduction in port dues
La Rochelle 30 - 60 13 % reduction in port dues
> 60 15 % reduction in port dues
Port of Kristian- 25 - 50 20 % reduction in port dues
Sand > 50 30 % reduction in port dues
Norway’s Pilotage > 50 100 % reduction in pilotage fees
Vessel Traffic Services
Gothenburg Port > 30 10 % reduction in port dues
+ LNG rebate
ESI
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (8)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Port of Tokyo 20 – 29.9 30 % reduction in port dues
30 – 39.9 40 % reduction in port dues
> 40 50 % reduction in port dues
Port Nelson NZ 20 - 30 5 % reduction in port dues
> 30 10 % reduction in port dues
Port of Alesund > 50 30 % reduction in port dues
Port of Bergen 30 - 50 30 % reduction in port dues
> 50 50 % reduction in port dues
Port of Stavanger 25 - 50 30 % reduction in port dues
> 50 50 % reduction in port dues
Port of Barcelona > 20 5 % reduction in port dues
ESI
ACTIVE PORTS (9)
ESI SCORE INCENTIVE
Port of Flåm/ x x % reduction in port dues
Gudvangen
Port of Ulsan > 31 10 % reduction in port dues
DNVGL ECO Insight > 0 50 % reduction on module fees
Port of Florø 25 ≤ - < 50 10 % rebate on entry dues
50 < - < 75 20 % rebate on entry dues
> 75 50 % rebate on entry dues
Port Authority 15 - 60 x % reduction of port dues
Fredrikstad/ x = (ESI Score - 15)*30/45
Sarpsborg > 60 30 % reduction in port dues
ESI: website
AUDITOR
• ESI Database: section for registration of Auditors and
audits
• Auditors are appointed by an IP and authorized by ESI
Administrator
• Auditors: experienced ship inspectors
• Entered into force on 1 January 2014
www.environmentalshipindex.org
www.wpci-esi.org
www.esi.wpci.nl
ESI: website
Current Projects
• Carbon Foot Print CFP Los Angeles
• On-shore Power Supply OPS Gothenburg
• Environmental Ship Index ESI Rotterdam
• LNG as a fuel LNG Antwerp
LNG
WPCI
LNG Working Group
LNG Working Group
Sub Working Group (SWG) 1: Bunker checklists and accreditation
• Common bunker checklists listing the requirements of ports with
regard to LNG bunkering operations in a port environment
• Truck-to-ship, ship-to-ship and shore-to-ship bunker checklists
• Guidelines for the accreditation of bunkering companies
LNG Working Group
LNG BUNKER CHECKLISTS
TRUCK TO SHIP SHIP TO SHIP SHORE TO SHIP
I. PART A: Pre Operations Checklist(This part should be completed before actual bunker operations start)
I. PART B: Pre Transfer Checklist (This part should be completed before actual transfer operations start)
I. PART C: LNG Transfer Data
Record of repetitive checks
II. After LNG Transfer Checklist (This part should be completed after transfer operations have been completed)
Appendix I - GUIDELINES FOR COMPLETING CHECKLIST Appendix II - LIST OF DEFINITIONS
LNG Bunkering
LNG Bunkering
HARVEY Gulf Facility Port Fourchon, LA
LNG Bunkering
CROWLEY LNG Supply / Bunker Barges Louisiana Seagas
Truck
LNG Bunkering
LNG Working Group
Sub Working Group 2: Risk Perimeters
• Create guidance towards a harmonized approach of risk
perimeters of the different possible LNG bunkering
scenarios within a port environment.
• National differences of failure frequencies will determine the
outcome.
• A guideline towards a harmonized approach
• Recommendations to enable a harmonized approach
LNG Risk perimeters
LNG Working Group
Sub Working Group SWG 3: LNG Awareness
• Produced a world class web site on LNG as a fuel
• Web site available since 1 July 2014
Updating in progress
Website LNG Bunkering
LNG Bunkering
1 January 2016
75 LNG fueled ships in operation worldwide
86 confirmed LNG fueled new builds
1 April 2016
80 LNG fueled ships in operation worldwide
106 confirmed LNG fueled new builds
LNG Bunkering
NORWAY
Floro
Bergen Agotnes
Bergen Halhjem
Karmoy
Stavanger Risavika
Vestbase
Bodo
Fredrikstad
Kristiansand
FINLAND
Turku
Tornio
SWEDEN
Nynashamn (Stockholm)
Lysekil
Gothenburg
LITHUANIA
Klaipeda
LNG Bunkering
POLAND
Swinoujscie
DANMARK
Hirtshals
NETHERLANDS
Rotterdam
Amsterdam
BELGIUM
Antwerp
Zeebrugge
Ghent
SINGAPORE
SPAIN
Barcelona
Valencia
UNITED STATES
Jacksonville FL
Port Fourchon LA
ARGENTINA
Buenos Aires
KOREA
Incheon
HONG KONG
LNG Bunkering
GATE TERMINAL
ROTTERDAM
TRUCK / CONT.
2014
174
2015
788
FLUXYS TERMINAL
ZEEBRUGGE
TRUCK / CONT.
2013
819
2014
1670
2015
1184
LNG Bunkering
EMISSIONS
PRODUCTION OF CO2
(Well - To - Wheel)
HFO 77.55 g/MJ
LNG 69.45 g/MJ
Some thoughts