arX

iv:1

601.

0543

2v1

[as

tro-

ph.G

A]

20

Jan

2016

Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 000, 1–15 (2016) Printed 24 January 2016 (MN LATEX style file v2.2)

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081

Allan Schnorr-Muller,1,2 Thaisa Storchi-Bergmann,3 Andrew Robinson,4 Davide Lena,5,6

Neil M. Nagar71Max-Planck-Institut fur Extraterrestrische Physik, Giessenbachstr. 1, D-85741 Garching, Germany2CAPES Foundation, Ministry of Education of Brazil, 70040-020, Brasılia, Brazil3Instituto de Fısica, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, 91501-970, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil4Physics Department, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York 14623, USA5SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, NL-3584 CA Utrecht, the Netherlands6Department of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, Nijmegen, PO Box 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, the Netherlands7Astronomy Department, Universidad de Concepcion, Casilla 160-C, Concepcion, Chile

24 January 2016

ABSTRACT

We present two-dimensional gaseous kinematics of the inner 1.2× 1.8 kpc2 of theSeyfert 2 galaxy NGC3081, from optical spectra (5600–7000A) obtained with theGMOS integral field spectrograph on the Gemini North telescope at a spatial resolutionof ≈ 100pc. We have identified two-components in the line emitting gas. A narrowercomponent (FWHM ≈ 60-100km s−1), which appears to be gas in the galaxy disk,and which shows a distorted rotation pattern, is observed over the whole field of view.A broader component (FWHM ≈150-250km s−1) is present in the inner ≈ 2′′(200 pc)and shows blueshifts and redshifts in the near and far sides of the galaxy, respec-tively, consistent with a bipolar outflow. Assuming this to be the case, we estimatethat the mass outflow rate in ionized gas (Mout) is between 1.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1 and6.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1. The subtraction of a rotation model from the narrower compo-nent velocity field reveals a pattern of excess blueshifts of ≈ 50 km s−1 in the far sideof the galaxy and similar excess redshifts in the near side, which are cospatial witha previously known nuclear bar. We interpret these residuals as due to gas followingnon-circular orbits in the barred potential. Under the assumption that these motionsmay lead to gas inflows, we estimate an upper limit for the mass inflow rate in ionizedgas of φ≈ 1.3× 10−2M⊙ yr−1.

Key words: galaxies: individual (NGC3081) – galaxies: active – galaxies: Seyfert –galaxies: nuclei – galaxies: kinematics and dynamics

1 INTRODUCTION

It is widely accepted that the radiation emitted by an activegalactic nucleus (AGN) is a result of accretion on to thecentral supermassive black hole (hereafter SMBH). However,understanding how mass is transferred from kiloparsec scalesdown to nuclear scales has been a long-standing problem inthe study of nuclear activity in galaxies.

Theoretical studies and simulations have shown thatnon-axisymmetric potentials efficiently promote gas in-flow towards the inner regions (Shlosman et al. 1990;Emsellem et al. 2003; Knapen 2005; Emsellem et al. 2006).Simulations by Maciejewski (2004a,b) demonstrated that,if a central SMBH is present, spiral shocks can extend allthe way to the SMBH vicinity and generate gas inflow con-sistent with the observed accretion rates. Simulations pre-

sented in Hopkins & Quataert (2010) showed that on scalesof . 500 pc in gas rich systems a system of nested grav-itational instabilities with a range of morphologies suchas nuclear spiral arms, rings, barred rings, clumpy disksand streams generate gas inflows. Nuclear bars have alsobeen identified as a mechanism capable of driving gas in-wards to scales of tens of parsecs (Shlosman et al. 1989;Englmaier & Shlosman 2004).

A strong correlation between the presence of nu-clear dust structures (spirals, filaments and disks) andnuclear activity in early type galaxies was reported bySimoes Lopes et al. (2007). Specifically, they found thatthere is a marked difference in the dust and gas contentwithin the inner ≈ 1 kpc of early-type active and non-activegalaxies: while the former always have dusty structures, inthe form of spiral and filaments on scales of hundreds of par-

c© 2016 RAS

2 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

secs, only 25% of the non-active ones have such structures.This indicates that a reservoir of gas and dust is a necessarycondition for the nuclear activity and it also suggests thatthe dusty structures are tracers of feeding channels to theAGN. This is confirmed in the study of Martini et al. (2013)who found that in the AGN hosts the mass of dust rangesbetween 105 and 106M⊙, implying 107–108M⊙ of gas in theinner ≈ 1 kpc.

In order to test the hypothesis that nuclear spi-rals channel gas inwards to feed the SMBH, our grouphas been mapping gas flows in the inner kiloparsec ofnearby AGNs using optical and near-infrared integralfield spectroscopic observations of the inner kiloparsecof nearby AGN. So far, we have observed gas inflowsalong nuclear spirals in NGC1097 (Fathi et al. 2006),NGC6951 (Storchi-Bergmann et al. 2007), NGC4051(Riffel et al. 2008), M79 (Riffel et al. 2013), NGC2110(Schnorr-Muller et al. 2014a; Diniz et al. 2014) andNGC7213 (Schnorr-Muller et al. 2014b). We also observedgas inflows in the galaxy M81 (Schnorr Muller et al. 2011),where the inflow was mostly traced by dust lanes. Hintsfor the presence of inflows along dust lanes were also foundin NGC1386 (Lena et al. 2015). Gas inflows along nuclearspirals have also been observed by other groups. Near-infrared integral field spectroscopic observations revealedinflows along nuclear spiral arms in NGC1097 (Davies et al.2009) and in NGC7743 (Davies et al. 2014). Recent ALMA(Atacama Large Millimeter Array) observations revealedstreaming motions along nuclear spirals in NGC1433(Combes et al. 2013) and NGC1566 (Combes et al. 2014).

Inflows driven by large-scale stellar bars have beenobserved in many objects, for example, NGC4151(Mundell & Shone 1999), NGC4569 (Boone et al. 2007),NGC6951 (van der Laan et al. 2011) and NGC3227(Davies et al. 2014). It has been found that, among localearly-type barred spirals, ≈ 30% host an inner secondarybar (Erwin & Sparke 2002; Laine et al. 2002; Erwin 2004),suggesting that such systems are common. Gas inflowsdriven by nuclear bars, however, have only been observedin a few objects so far (de Lorenzo-Caceres et al. 2013).The Nuclei of Galaxies (NUGA) team (Garcıa-Burillo et al.2003) found that in a sample of 25 local low luminosityAGNs, gas is being driven into the central 100 pc in 1/3 ofthem (Haan et al. 2009; Garcıa-Burillo & Combes 2012).

In this work, we present an analysis of the gas kine-matics and excitation in the inner kiloparsec of the ac-tive galaxy NGC3081 as derived from integral field spec-troscopic observations carried out with the Gemini Northtelescope. NGC3081 is a S0/a galaxy hosting a Seyfert2 nucleus. At a distance of 37.7Mpc (from NED1) theresulting scale is 179 pc/′′(cosmology corrected assumingH0 =73 kms−1 Mpc−1, Ωmatter =0.27 and Ωvacuum =0.73).

NGC3081 has a weak large scale bar and a nuclear bar(Buta 1990), and four resonance rings: two outer rings, aninner ring and a nuclear ring (Buta & Purcell 1998). Insidethe nuclear ring, two spiral arms are observed. A compar-ison between the continuum adjacent to the [O III] and tothe [N II]+Hα lines showed that the nuclear ring and nu-clear spiral arms are sites of recent or ongoing star formation

1 NASA/IPAC extragalactic database

(Ferruit et al. 2000). Radio observations revealed a compactradio source oriented roughly along the north-south direc-tion (Nagar et al. 1999). Slitless spectroscopy by Ruiz et al.(2005) revealed the presence of an outflow in the inner 2′′

of the galaxy. It is also worth noting that broad emissionlines have been detected in polarized light in this object –see Moran et al. (2000). However, broad near-infrared emis-sion lines were not detected by Goodrich et al. (1994) orReunanen et al. (2003).

The present paper is organized as follows. In Section 2,we describe the observations and data reduction. In Section3, we present the procedures used for the analysis of the dataand the subsequent results. In section 4, we discuss our re-sults and present estimates of the mass inflow rate and massoutflow rate and in Section 5, we present our conclusions.

2 OBSERVATIONS AND DATA REDUCTION

The observations were obtained with the integral field unitof the Gemini Multi Object Spectrograph (GMOS-IFU) atthe Gemini North telescope on the night of February 14,2011 (Gemini project GN-2011A-Q-85). The observationsconsisted of two adjacent IFU fields (covering 7× 5 arcsec2

each) resulting in a total angular coverage of 7× 10 arcsec2

around the nucleus with the largest side of the field orientedalong position angle (PA) 70. Four exposures of 615 sec-onds were obtained for each field, slightly shifted spatiallyand dithered spectrally in order to correct for detector de-fects and cosmic rays after combination of the frames. Theseeing during the observation was 0.′′6, as measured from thefull width at half-maximum (FWHM) of a spatial profile ofthe calibration standard star. This corresponds to a spatialresolution at the galaxy of ≈ 100 pc.

The selected wavelength range was 5600-7000 A,in order to cover the Hα+[N II]λλ6548,6583 and[S II]λλ6716,6731 emission lines. The observations wereobtained with the grating GMOS R400-G5305 (set tocentral wavelength of either λ6500 A or λ6550 A) at aspectral resolution of R≈ 2000. The wavelength calibrationis accurate to the order of 8 kms−1.

The data reduction was performed using specific tasksdeveloped for GMOS data in the gemini.gmos package aswell as generic tasks in iraf

2. The reduction process com-prised bias subtraction, flat-fielding, trimming, wavelengthcalibration, sky subtraction, relative flux calibration, build-ing of the data cubes at a sampling of 0.′′1× 0.′′1, and finallythe alignment and combination of eight data cubes.

3 RESULTS

In Fig. 1, we present in the upper left panel the acquisitionimage of NGC3081 and in the upper right panel an image ofthe inner 22′′ × 22′′ of the galaxy obtained with the WFPC2(Wide Field Planetary Camera 2) through the filter F606Waboard the Hubble Space Telescope (HST). In the middle

2 IRAF is distributed by the National Optical Astronomy Obser-vatories, which are operated by the Association of Universities forResearch in Astronomy, Inc., under cooperative agreement withthe National Science Foundation.

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 3

Figure 1. Top left: acquisition image. Top right: HST WFPC2 F606W image of the inner 20′′ × 20′′. Middle left: structure map obtainedfrom the HST image; the rectangle delimits the FOV of the GMOS-IFU observations. Middle right: continuum image extracted fromthe IFU spectra. The continuous black line indicates the position of the kinematic major axis (PA=90), as determined from the stellarvelocity field in the inner 8′′ by Stoklasova et al. (2009). The dashed black line indicates the position of the nuclear bar (PA=122).Bottom: spectra corresponding to the regions marked as N, A and B in the IFU image.

left panel, we present a structure map of the HST image (seeSimoes Lopes et al. 2007). Four features are visible in thestructure map: a nuclear ring, a nuclear bar and two nuclearspirals arms (delineated by dark lanes) emerging from thenuclear bar. The rectangle delimits the field-of-view (here-after FOV) covered by the IFU observations. In the middleright panel, we present a continuum image from the IFUspectra. The nuclear bar is visible along PA=122 (dashed

line, Erwin 2004). In the lower panel, we present three spec-tra of the galaxy corresponding to locations marked as A, Band N in the IFU image and extracted within apertures of0.′′2× 0.′′2. The location of the nucleus has been assumed tobe the location of the peak of the continuum emission. Weadopt an inclination of the disk of 40 from the axial ratio(from NED).

Spectra N and B are typical of Seyfert 2 galaxies, show-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

4 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

Figure 2. Map of the Gauss-Hermite moments h3 and h4.

ing [N II]λλ6548,6583, Hα and [S II]λλ6717,6731 emissionlines, with He Iλ5876, [FeVII]λ6086 and [O I]λλ6300,6363also present in the spectrum of the nucleus (N). The spec-trum from location A shows narrow (velocity dispersion of≈ 60 kms−1) emission lines and an [N II]/Hα ratio of about0.3, characteristic of H II regions. The spectrum from regionN shows asymmetric emission lines with blue wings, visibleparticularly in [FeVII] and Hα, where the wing causes theline to blend with [N II]λ6548. The spectrum from region Bshows lines with a velocity dispersion of ≈ 100 km s−1 and[N II]/Hα> 1, typical of the extended narrow line region ofAGNs.

3.1 Measurements

The gaseous centroid velocities, velocity dispersions and theemission-line fluxes were obtained by fitting Gaussians tothe [N II], Hα, [O I] and [S II], He I and [FeVII] emissionlines. Although at most locations a single Gaussian fits theemission-line profiles well, close to the nucleus (see the de-scription below), the profiles are best fitted with two Gaus-sians. Errors were estimated from Monte Carlo simulationsin which Gaussian noise is added to the spectra; 100 itera-tions were performed. In order to limit the number of freeparameters in our fit, we adopted the following physicallymotivated constraints:

(i) flux[N II]λ6583/flux[N II]λ6548 = 3;(ii) the [N II]λ6583, [N II]λ6548 and Hα lines have the

same FWHM;(iii) the [N II]λ6583, [N II]λ6548 and Hα lines have the

same centroid velocity.

In order to determine whether a two-Gaussian fit wasnecessary to adequately fit the emission lines in a given spec-trum, we fitted Gauss-Hermite polynomials to the [N II] andHα emission lines and built maps of the h3 and h4 Gauss-Hermite moments, which parametrize the deviations fromGaussianity, h3 being related to the skewness of the pro-files and h4 to the kurtosis. The respective maps are shownin Fig. 2. The Gauss-Hermite moment h4 is ≈ 0 over mostof the inner 2′′, only reaching values higher than 0.1 in re-gions where the signal-to-noise ratio of the [N II]λ6583 lineis lower than 10. When the signal-to-noise ratios of [N II]are ≈ 10 or lower the values of h3 and h4 are significantly

affected by noise (for example wings might be fitted to noisefeatures adjacent to emission lines influencing the h3 val-ues). Accordingly, we only consider the regions where thesignal-to-noise ratio of the [N II]λ6583 is larger than 10 inour analysis. The h3 map, on the other hand, shows the pres-ence of both blue wings (h3< 0) and red wings (h3> 0) inthe [N II] and Hα profiles in a region extending from −1.′′5to 3′′ in the vertical direction and from -2′′ to 2′′ in thehorizontal direction. We therefore performed two Gaussianfits within this region. Considering that the typical uncer-tainty in the flux distribution measurements in the inner 2′′

is of the order of 10% (see Section 3.4), we discarded as poorfits all those where the ratio between the narrow and broadcomponents flux distribution was lower than 0.1. Two Gaus-sian fits were performed for all the emission lines presentin the spectra when the ratio was larger than 0.1. In thecase of He Iλ5876 and [O I]λ6300 no location satisfied theabove criteria and only one component was fitted. Four ex-amples of the two Gaussian fit to the [N II] and Hα lines areshown in Fig. 3. As seen in the example spectra, the [N II]and Hα line profiles are fitted by a “narrow” component(60 km s−1 6σ6 120 km s−1), which fits the line core, anda “broad component” (100 km s−1 6σ6 250 kms−1), whichfits the wings. We will call these components “narrower com-ponent” and “broader component” from now on to avoidconfusion, as the terms “narrow component” and “broadcomponent” traditionally refer to gas emission originatingin the narrow and broad line regions.

3.2 Gaseous kinematics

As the single-Gaussian fit provides a good representation ofmost of the flux in the profile everywhere (leaving only wingsnot well fitted in the inner part of the FOV), we present theresults from both the one-component and two-componentfits.

3.2.1 Single-component fit

In Fig. 4, we show centroid velocity, velocity dispersion, fluxdistribution and [N II]/Hα ratio maps obtained by fitting asingle-Gaussian to the [N II] and Hα lines. A systemic veloc-ity of 2394 kms−1 (see Section 4.2) was subtracted from thecentroid velocity maps. The [S II] and [O I] maps are similarto the [N II] maps and thus are not shown. The resultingvelocity field shows a distorted rotation pattern in whichthe east side of the galaxy is approaching and the west sideis receding. Under the assumption that the nuclear spiralarms are trailing, it can be concluded that the near side ofthe galaxy is the south, and the far side is the north.

The velocity dispersion map shows velocity dispersionsof the order of 100 kms−1 around the major axis and ina region extending to the northeast. The highest velocitydispersions are observed in a region extending from ≈ 1′′ to≈ 2′′ north. Over the rest of the FOV, the velocity dispersionis of the order of 80 kms−1.

3.2.2 Two-component fit

In Fig. 5 and Fig. 6, we show centroid velocity, velocity dis-persion, flux distribution, density and line ratio maps ob-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 5

Figure 3. Example of the two Gaussians fit for four different spectra.

Figure 4. Centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion (km s−1), flux distribution in logarithmic scale (erg cm−2 s−1 per pixel) and[N II]/Hα maps as obtained by fitting a single Gaussian to the [N II] and Hα lines. The solid white line marks the position of the line ofnodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marks the position of the nucleus, assumed to correspondto the peak of the continuum emission.

tained by fitting two Gaussians to the [N II], Hα and [S II]lines. In Fig. 5, we show the maps obtained for the narrowercomponent, which were constructed by combining resultsfrom both the single and two Gaussian fits. The narrowercomponent centroid velocity and velocity dispersion mapsare similar to the single Gaussian maps, although the low

velocity dispersion region just to the north of the nucleus ismore extended in the narrower component map. The broadercomponent centroid velocity map (Fig. 6) shows blueshiftedvelocities in the inner 1′′. Redshifted velocities are observedto the north of the nucleus, in the far side of the galaxy,reaching 60 kms−1. The highest velocity dispersions are ob-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

6 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

Figure 5. Top panel: centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution in logarithmic scale (erg cm−2 s−1

per pixel) of the narrower component. Bottom panel: electron density (cm−3), [N II]/Hα and [O I]/Hα of the narrower component. Thesolid white line marks the position of the line of nodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marksthe position of the nucleus, assumed to correspond to the peak of the continuum emission.

served at the locations showing the highest blueshifts, wherevalues between 160 km s−1 and 250 kms−1 are observed. Tothe north of the nucleus the velocity dispersions are lower,between 100 kms−1 and 150 kms−1.

The [FeVII]λ6086 emission line is clearly double peakedover the inner 0.′′6 around the nucleus. The blue peak ap-pears as an extended blue wing in spectrum N in Fig 1. InFig. 7, we show the maps resulting from fitting two Gaus-sians to the [FeVII] emission line. The two [FeVII] com-ponents are systematically blueshifted and redshifted withrespect to the systemic velocity of the galaxy (see Sec-tion 4.2). The [FeVII] blueshifted component shows veloc-ities of about −100 kms−1 and velocity dispersions of theorder of 300 kms−1. The [FeVII] redshifted component isobserved in a region extending from 1′′ southeast of the nu-cleus to ≈ 2′′ northwest of the nucleus. The redshifted com-ponent shows velocities within 100–200 kms−1 and velocitydispersions within 100-150 kms−1. The He I centroid veloc-ities and velocity dispersions displayed in Fig. 8 are similarto those of the [FeVII] redshifted component.

3.3 Line fluxes and gas excitation

In this section, we discuss only the line fluxes and gas ex-citation of the two-component fits, as the results from thesingle-component fit are mostly the same as the ones fromthe narrower component fit.

The flux distribution of the narrower [N II] componentis shown in the upper right panel of Fig. 5. In the inner 1′′,the isoflux contours are extended approximately along thenorth-south direction. Between 1′′ and 2′′ the contours areextended approximately along the N-S direction and from 2′′

to the borders of the FOV the contours are oriented alonga PA of ≈ 160. The Hα, [S II] and [O I] flux distributionmaps all show similar features; however, the [O I] emissionis confined within a radius of ≈ 2′′.

The narrower component [N II]/Hα map has a peculiarshape, with the lowest values observed S, SW and NW of thenucleus. The line ratio values increase with distance from thenucleus along the east-west direction. In the inner 2′′, the[N II]/Hα line ratio has values between 0.8 and 1.5. There

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 7

Figure 6. Top panel: centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution in logarithmic scale (erg cm−2 s−1

per pixel) of the broader component. Bottom panel: density (cm−3) and [N II]/Hα of the broader component. The solid white line marksthe position of the line of nodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marks the position of thenucleus, assumed to correspond to the peak of the continuum emission.

are three regions, one to the northwest, one to the southeastand another to the south of the nucleus, towards the bordersof the FOV, that show [N II]/Hα ratios between 0.2 and 0.5,characteristic of H II regions. Similarly, values of the order of0.6–0.7 are observed in a region 2′′ northwest of the nucleus,also indicating that this is an H II region. The [O I]/Hα ratioreaches a maximum of 0.2 at ≈ 2′′ north of the nucleus anda minimum of 0.05 at ≈ 2′′ southeast of the nucleus.

The narrower component gas density map (Fig. 5), ob-tained from the [SII]λλ6717/6731 line ratio assuming anelectronic temperature of 10000K (Osterbrock & Ferland2006), has its peak in a region extending to 1′′ north ofthe nucleus, where it reaches 800-900 cm−3. The density de-creases with radius, reaching a minimum of 200-300 cm−3 at1.′′5 from the nucleus.

Similarly to the narrower component emission, thebroader component emission is extended towards the north.The [N II]/Hα ratio is also similar to the narrower compo-nent ratio, with the lowest values occurring S and NW of thenucleus and the ratio increasing along the NE-SW direction.

The broader component density varies between 400 cm−3

and 1000 cm−3.The [FeVII] red component emission to the southeast

of the nucleus is stronger by about a factor of 3 comparedto the emission to the northwest. The He I flux distributionmap is similar to that of the narrower [N II] component,showing an extension to the north.

3.4 Uncertainties

To test the robustness of the fits and estimate the uncertain-ties in the quantities measured from each spectrum in ourdatacube, we performed Monte Carlo simulations in whichGaussian noise was added to the observed spectrum. Foreach spaxel, the noise added in each Monte Carlo iterationwas randomly drawn from a Gaussian distribution whosedispersion was set to the expected Poissonian noise of thatspaxel. 100 iterations were performed and the estimated un-certainty in each parameter - line center, line width, and

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

8 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

Figure 7. Top panel: centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution in logarithmic scale (erg cm−2 s−1 perpixel) of the [FeVII] blueshifted component. Bottom panel: centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution(10−17 erg cm−2 s−1 per pixel) of the [FeVII] redshifted component. The solid white line marks the position of the line of nodes, thedashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marks the position of the nucleus, assumed to correspond to thepeak of the continuum emission.

total flux in the line - was derived from the σ of the pa-rameter distributions yielded by the iterations. In Figs. 9,10 and 11 we show the uncertainties in the measurement ofthe emission lines.

4 DISCUSSION

4.1 The broader component

The velocity map of the broader component (Fig. 6) showsblueshifted velocities around the nucleus and to the south-east, mostly in the near side of the galaxy, and redshiftedvelocities from 0.′′6 to 3′′ northwest of the nucleus, in the farside of the galaxy. This kinematics can be interpreted as dueto a nuclear outflow extending from 1.′′2 SSE (215 pc) to 3′′

(540 pc) NNW and from 1′′(179 pc) WSW to 1.′′3 (233 pc)ENE.

In Fig. 12, we present a comparison between the[O III]λ5007 flux distribution from HST observations

(Ferruit et al. 2000) and both the [N II] narrower andbroader component flux distributions. The spatial distribu-tion of the [N II] broader component emission is similar tothat of the [O III] emission, so they are likely tracing thesame gas. Considering this, we can compare our observa-tions with the HST/STIS (Space Telescope Imaging Spec-trograph) spectroscopy slitless observations along PA=335

of the [O III]λ5007 line presented by Ruiz et al. (2005).They observed blueshifted velocities up to ≈ –150 kms−1

at 1′′ southeast of the nucleus (see Fig. 4 of their paper)and redshifted velocities up to ≈ 150 km s−1 at 1′′ north-west of nucleus. Between 1′′and 2′′northwest of the nu-cleus, the redshifted velocities decrease to ≈ 100 km s−1. Theblueshifted velocities observed by Ruiz et al. (2005) are ingood agreement with our observations. On the other hand,in a region extending from the nucleus to 1′′northwest,where they observe only redshifted velocities, we observe amix of blueshifted and redshifted velocities, ranging from≈ –100 kms−1 to ≈ 60 kms−1. Ruiz et al. (2005) also ob-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 9

Figure 8. Centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution in logarithmic scale (erg cm−2 s−1 per pixel) ofthe He I emission line. The solid white line marks the position of the line of nodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear barand the black cross marks the position of the nucleus, assumed to correspond to the peak of the continuum emission.

Figure 9. Top: uncertainties (%) in the centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution for the narrowercomponent. Bottom: uncertainties in the elcetron density, [N II]/Hα and [OI]/Hα ratios for the narrower component.

serve a mix of blueshifted and redshifted velocities, butfarther from the nucleus, between ≈ 0.′′8 and 2′′northwestof the nucleus. Nevertheless, the biggest difference betweenthe GMOS and HST observations is in the nucleus, whereRuiz et al. (2005) observe velocities around 0 kms−1 whilewe observe blueshifted velocities of ≈ 100 kms−1. Ruiz et al.(2005) adopted a systemic velocity of 2459 kms−1 in theirwork, larger than that used here 2394 kms−1. Clearly thedifference between systemic velocities cannot explain thedisagreement between observations, as subtracting a larger

velocity would increase the blueshift. Our data are seeinglimited, however, and at least part of the differences in theobserved velocities could be related to this. It is also worthnoting that in the Ruiz et al. (2005) measurements there areemission structures at the same position with different veloc-ities and velocity dispersions, on both sides of the nucleus,indicating that two velocity components are present. It islikely that these components are the narrower and broadercomponents we identified in our data.

Finally, considering the similarities between our obser-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

10 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

Figure 10. Top: uncertainties (%) in the centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution for the broadercomponent. Bottom: uncertainties in the electron density and [N II]/Hα ratio for the broader component.

vations and the [O III] observations by Ruiz et al. (2005),we conclude that the broader component is due to gas ina bipolar outflow, oriented roughly along the south–northdirection. We also argue that the part of the outflow ob-served in redshift to the north is in front of the galaxy plane,and can thus be observed farther from the nucleus than theblueshifted part of the outflow which comes from behind thegalaxy plane and is therefore attenuated. As can be seen inthe rightmost panel of Fig. 12, the [O III] emission traceswell the emission of the redshifted [FeVII] component. Thisindicates that the [FeVII] emission, and presumably the He Iemission as well, comes from the nuclear outflow.

The [N II]/Hα ratio map shows that the lowest values,between 0.2 and 0.8 are observed roughly NE and SW ofthe nucleus, cospatial with the higher densities. The highest[N II]/Hα ratios are observed approximately 1′′(179 pc) eastand west of the nucleus and 2′′(358 pc) north of the nucleus.

The characteristic properties of the broader componentgas, in particular its proximity to the nucleus, electron den-sity (600–1000 cm−3), velocity dispersion (120–250 km s−1)and its complex kinematics, lead us to identify it as the nar-row line region in NGC3081. The fact that there appearsbe no AGN-photoionized extended narrow line region sug-gests that the radiation cone (presumably aligned with thebipolar flow) protrudes at a steep angle from the disk.

4.1.1 Estimating the mass outflow rate

Having concluded that the kinematics of the broader com-ponent are due to an outflow, we now calculate the massoutflow rate, assuming that the outflow occurs in a bicone.The total ejected mass will be twice the mass crossing each

end of the bicone, which can be calculated as:

Mout =mp v LHα

3JHα(T )Ne h(1)

where mp is the proton mass, v is theoutflowing velocity, LHα is the Hα lumi-nosity, JHα(T )= 3.534× 10−25 erg cm−3 s−1

(Osterbrock & Ferland 2006), Ne is the electron den-sity and h is the height of the bicone (equivalent to thedistance from the nucleus).

We will adopt the density, outflowing velocity andLHα values obtained from the redshifted region and a dis-tance to the nucleus of 1′′ (158 pc). The total Hα flux is6.7× 10−14 erg cm−2 s−1. Using the distance of 37.7 Mpc,we obtain a total luminosity for the outflowing gas ofLHα =11.3× 1040 erg s−1. The average electron density inthe outflow is 1350 cm−3 (from the [S II] ratio). Adopting adistance from the nucleus (height of the cone) of 1′′, we ob-tain an average projected outflowing velocity of ≈ 90 kms−1.This velocity, however, needs to be corrected for the incli-nation of the outflow. As the complicated geometry of theoutflow does not allow us to obtain an estimate of the incli-nation of the central axis of the bicone, we adopt the incli-nation of the disk (40) as an upper limit for the inclinationof the central axis. With this assumption, we obtain a min-imum velocity of 140 kms−1. Based on the HST [OIII] fluxdistribution (Fig. 12), we assume an opening angle of the bi-cone of 30. Considering that the redshifted cone is in frontof the disk, we obtain a lower limit of 10 for the inclina-tion of the central axis, resulting in a maximum velocityof 520 kms−1. We thus obtain a lower limit for the outflowmass rate of Mout ≈ 1.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1 and an upper limitof Mout ≈ 6.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1.

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 11

Figure 11. Top: uncertainties (%) in the centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distribution for the blueshifted[FeVII] component. Middle: uncertainties (%) in the centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) and flux distributions forthe redshifted [FeVII] component. Bottom: Top: uncertainties (%) in the centroid velocity (km s−1), velocity dispersion(km s−1) andflux distributions for the He I emission line.

4.2 The narrower component

4.2.1 Kinematics

As previously mentioned, the velocity map derived from the[N II] narrower component covers the whole FOV and showsa typical rotation pattern, although distortions due to non-circular motions are present. In order to isolate these non-circular motions, we modeled the narrower component ve-locity field assuming a spherical potential with pure circularorbits, with the observed radial velocity at a position (R,ψ)in the plane of the sky given by the relation presented inBertola et al. (1991):

V = Vs+ARcos(ψ − ψ0)sin(θ)cospθ

R2[sin2(ψ − ψ0) + cos2θcos2(ψ − ψ0)] + c2cos2θp/2

where θ is the inclination of the disk (with θ=0 for a face-ondisk), ψ0 is the position angle of the line of nodes, Vs is thesystemic velocity, R is the radius and A, c, and p are pa-rameters of the model. We assumed the kinematical centerto be cospatial with the peak of the the continuum emis-sion. We fixed the PA of the kinematic major axis of the

gas disk as 90 (Stoklasova et al. 2009), assuming that thegas and stellar disks have the same orientation in the inner8′′. The inclination was fixed as 40, a value we obtainedfrom the axial ratio (from NED). The resulting parame-ters A, c, and p are 250±2 kms−1, 5.′′4 ± 0.1 and 1.0 ± 0.1respectively. The systemic velocity corrected to the helio-centric reference frame is 2394±6 km s−1 (taking into ac-count both errors in the measurement and the fit), in goodagreement with previous measurements of the systemic ve-locity by Theureau et al. (2005), who obtained a value of2391 kms−1 from 21cm neutral hydrogen line measurements,and Storchi-Bergmann et al. (1996), who obtained a value of2385 kms−1 from the modeling of the Hα velocity curve inthe inner 6′′ along PA=72.5. The model velocity field isshown in Fig. 13, together with the observed velocity field,structure map and residuals.

The residual map (Fig. 13) shows that, although thereare many regions where the residuals are smaller than10 km s−1, there are two conspicuous regions with high resid-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

12 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

Figure 12. Left: [O III] λ5007 image from HST observations (WFPC2-PC/F502N, proposal ID: 6419, PI: A. Wilson). Center left:[O III] contours overlaid on the [N II] narrower component flux distribution. Center right: [O III] contours overlaid on the [N II] broadercomponent flux distribution. Right: [O III] contours overlaid on the [FeVII] redshifted component flux distribution. The solid white linemarks the position of the line of nodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marks the position ofthe nucleus, assumed to correspond to the peak of the continuum emission.

Figure 13. Centroid velocity, structure map, modeled velocity field and residuals for the narrower component. The solid white linemarks the position of the line of nodes, the dashed line marks the position of the nuclear bar and the black cross marks the position ofthe nucleus, assumed to correspond to the peak of the continuum emission.

ual velocities along the nuclear bar: a region dominated byredshifts in the near side of the galaxy and a region dom-inated by blueshifts in the far side, both extending fromthe borders of the FOV to 1′′ from the nucleus. Consideringthe close alignment of these residuals with the axis of thebar, together with the spatial distribution of redshifts andblueshifts, we conclude that they are due to non-circularmotions of the gas induced by the gravitational potentialof the nuclear bar. The bar can induce shocks, allowingthe gas to lose angular momentum and move towards thecentre where it can feed the active nucleus of NGC3081.This is in line with the “bar within bars” scenario proposedby Shlosman et al. (1989). This result is similar to that re-ported by de Lorenzo-Caceres et al. (2013), of possible evi-dence of gas inflow along nuclear bars in four galaxies, in-cluding two Seyfert 2 galaxies and a LINER.

Blueshifted residuals are also observed in a curved stripextending from the borders of the FOV at ≈ 3′′north to 2′′

east, in the far side of the galaxy. A comparison betweenthe residual and structure maps in Fig. 13 shows that theblueshifted curved strip is cospatial with a dusty nuclear spi-

ral arm, hence we interpret these residuals as due to stream-ing motions along this nuclear spiral arm.

A third system of residuals can be identified, consistingof regions of redshifted and blueshifted velocities located 1–2′′NE and ≈ 1′′SW of the nucleus, respectively. These resid-uals could be related to the bipolar outflow observed in thebroader component: the redshifted and blueshifted regionsclosely border the NE and S edges of the broader com-ponent flux distribution, respectively (Fig. 6). Furthermore,redshifted residuals are associated with a region of increasedvelocity dispersion 2′′NE of the nucleus. In this scenario,this system results from an interaction between the bipolaroutflow and the disk gas, with the former driving shocksinto the disk gas and pushing it outwards. Alternatively, theblueshifted residuals and the redshifted residuals observedbetween 1′′ SW and 1′′ NE can also be due to gas followingnon-circular orbits in the nuclear bar. This scenario cannotaccount for the redshifted residuals observed between 1′′ and2′′ NE, however, as they are outside of the bar; thus, in thisalternative scenario, part of the redshifted residuals likelyoriginate in an interaction with the nuclear outflow.

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 13

4.2.2 Excitation

Along the nuclear bar, [N II]/Hα ratio values between 0.2and 1.0 are observed. Specifically, cospatial with the red-shifted region 2′′ southeast of the nucleus, the [N II]/Hα ra-tio values vary over the range 0.2–0.5, which is typical of H IIregions. Cospatial to the blueshifted residuals 2′′ northwestof the nucleus, the [N II]/Hα ratio values are larger, between0.6 and 0.7; however, they are still smaller than the valuesobserved closer to the nucleus. We argue that this region isalso a site of star formation; the ratio values in this casesuggest the presence of a significant fraction of gas that isbeing photoionized by the AGN and not only by the youngstars. This may be evidence that bar-driven gas flows areinducing the formation of new stars in this galaxy. H II re-gions are also observed in the southern nuclear spiral arm,2′′south of the nucleus. In the inner 2′′ the [N II]/Hα ratiovalues are typical of AGNs. Similar to what is observed inthe broader component [N II]/Hα map, the lowest values,between 0.8 and 1.0, are observed SW and NE of the nu-cleus. The highest values, between 1.2 and 2, are observedto the east and west of the nucleus, from ≈1′′ to the edges ofthe FOV. These regions are also where the highest velocitydispersions are observed, which implies that the gas is ion-ized by shocks. The density map (Fig. 5) shows an increaseto the northeast, partly cospatial to redshifted residuals NEof the nucleus.

4.2.3 Estimating an upper limit to the mass inflow rate

If we assume that the inflow velocity is of the order of theresidual velocities observed along the nuclear bar, we canobtain an upper limit to the mass inflow rate. In this case,assuming the total inflow rate is twice that observed in oneof the sides of the bar and that the inflow occurs in the planeof the galaxy disk, the ionised gas mass inflow rate whichcrosses a section of one of the halves of the nuclear bar isgiven by:

Min = Ne v π r2mp f (2)

where Ne is the electron density, v is the inflowing velocityof the gas , mp is the mass of the proton, r is the radius ofthe cross section of the bar and f is the filling factor. Thefilling factor can be estimated from:

LHα ∼ f N2e JHα(T )V (3)

where JHα(T )= 3.534× 10−25 erg cm−3 s−1

(Osterbrock & Ferland 2006) and LHα is the Hα lu-minosity emitted by a volume V . Assuming the volume ofthe nuclear bar can be approximated by the volume of acylinder with radius r and height h, we obtain:

Min =mp v LHα

JHα(T )Ne h(4)

We adopt as inflowing velocity the average residualvelocity observed in the redshifted region extending from≈ 1′′ southeast of the nucleus to the borders of the FOV,3.′′3 southeast of the nucleus (see the residual map inFig. 13). After correcting this velocity for the inclinationof the galaxy, we obtain an average residual velocity of59 kms−1. As the gas flows along the nuclear bar, wealso need to correct this velocity based on the position

of the bar in relation to the line of sight. We then ob-tain a velocity of 111 kms−1. The total Hα flux and theaverage density are 5.1× 10−14 erg cm−2 s−1 and 440 cm−3

respectively. Adopting a distance of 37.7Mpc, we obtainLHα =8.6× 1039 erg s−1. Adopting a height of 2.′′3, we ob-tain an upper limit to the mass inflow rate of ionized gas ofφ≈ 2.4× 10−2M⊙ yr−1 at 1′′ from the nucleus.

The mass accretion rate necessary to produce the lumi-nosity of the Seyfert nucleus of NGC3081 is calculated asfollows:

m =Lbol

c2η

with η≈ 0.1 (Frank et al. 2002 as usually adopted forSeyfert galaxies). Adopting a bolometric luminosity ofLbol =4× 1043 erg s−1 (Esquej 2014) we derive an accretionrate of m=7× 10−3 M⊙ yr−1.

The upper limit to the ionized gas mass inflow rateis 10 times larger than the nuclear accretion rate. Thisis not surprising, as inflow velocities in bars are ex-pected to be much lower than 111 km s−1 (Athanassoula1992; Regan & Teuben 2004). An inflow velocity as low as≈ 10 kms−1 would drive enough ionized gas inwards to feedthe AGN. If there are significant quantities of neutral andmolecular gas inflowing, even lower inflow velocities couldprovide enough gas.

5 CONCLUSIONS

We have measured the gaseous kinematics in the inner1.2× 1.8 kpc2 of the Seyfert 2 galaxy NGC3081, from opti-cal spectra obtained with the GMOS integral field spectro-graph on the Gemini North telescope at a spatial resolutionof ≈ 100 pc. The main results of this paper are as follows:

• Extended gas emission is observed over the whole FOV,with the profiles being well fitted by a combination of Gaus-sian curves;

• In the inner ≈ 2′′, two-components are needed: a nar-rower component, that is present over the entire FOV, anda broader component, which is present only in the inner 2′′;

• The broader component centroid velocity map showsblueshifted velocities in the near side of the galaxy andredshifted velocities to the north of the nucleus, in the farside of the galaxy. We interpret this component as a bipo-lar outflow oriented along the north–south direction. Fromthe measured velocities, fluxes and density of the outflow-ing gas we estimate a lower limit for the outflow massrate of Mout ≈ 1.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1 and an upper limit ofMout ≈ 6.9× 10−3M⊙ yr−1;

• The narrower component centroid velocity map showsa distorted rotation pattern in which the east side of thegalaxy is approaching and the west side is receding. Aftersubtraction of a rotation model, we observe a redshifted re-gion in the near side of the galaxy and a blueshifted regionin the far side, both extending from the borders of the FOVto 1′′ from the nucleus and cospatial with the nuclear bar.

• We interpret these residuals as due to non-circularmotions induced by the potential of the nuclear bar thatmay lead to gas inflow. From the measured gas veloci-ties and emission-line fluxes along the bar, we estimate

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

14 A. Schnorr-Muller et al.

an upper limit to the ionized gas mass inflow rate ofφ≈ 1.3× 10−2M⊙ yr−1.

• We also observe in the narrower component redshiftedresiduals extending from the nucleus to the north-northeast,in the far side of the galaxy, and some blueshifted residualssouth of the nucleus. These residuals can be due to an inter-action between the bipolar outflow and gas in the disk, driv-ing it outwards, or due to non-circular orbits in the barredpotential.

• The low [N II]/Hα ratios observed along the bar indicatethe presence of H II there.

With our IFU observations, we have disentangled mul-tiple kinematical components contributing to the complexgas velocity field within the inner ≈ 1 kpc of this Seyfert 2galaxy. These include rotation in the galaxy disk plane, abipolar outflow from the AGN, non-circular motions alongthe nuclear bar, and an interaction between the bipolar out-flow and the disk gas.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank the anonymous referee for providing commentsand suggestions that have improved this paper. This workis based on observations obtained at the Gemini Obser-vatory, which is operated by the Association of Universi-ties for Research in Astronomy, Inc., under a cooperativeagreement with the NSF on behalf of the Gemini partner-ship: the National Science Foundation (United States), theScience and Technology Facilities Council (United King-dom), the National Research Council (Canada), CON-ICYT (Chile), the Australian Research Council (Aus-tralia), Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia (Brazil) andsouth-eastCYT (Argentina). NN acknowledges funding fromalma-conicyt 31110016, BASAL PFB-06/2007, and theFONDAP Center for Astrophysics. This material is basedupon work supported in part by the Brazilian institutionsCNPq and CAPES and by the National Science Founda-tion under Award No. AST-1108786. We wish to recognizeand acknowledge the cultural role and reverence that thesummit of Mauna Kea has always had within the indige-nous Hawaiian community. We are most fortunate to havethe opportunity to obtain data from observations conductedfrom this mountain.

REFERENCES

Athanassoula E., 1992, MNRAS, 259, 345Bertola F., Bettoni D., Danziger J., Sadler E., Sparke L.,de Zeeuw T., 1991, ApJ, 373, 369

Boone F., Baker A. J., Schinnerer E., Combes F., Garcıa-Burillo S., Neri R., Hunt L. K., Leon S., Krips M., TacconiL. J., Eckart A., 2007, A&A, 471, 113

Buta R., 1990, ApJ, 351, 62Buta R., Purcell G. B., 1998, AJ, 115, 484Combes F., Garcıa-Burillo S., Casasola V., Hunt L., KripsM., Baker A. J., Boone F., Eckart A., Marquez I., NeriR., Schinnerer E., Tacconi L. J., 2013, A&A, 558, A124

Combes F., Garcıa-Burillo S., Casasola V., Hunt L. K.,Krips M., Baker A. J., Boone F., Eckart A., Marquez I.,

Neri R., Schinnerer E., Tacconi L. J., 2014, A&A, 565,A97

Davies R. I., Maciejewski W., Hicks E. K. S., EmsellemE., Erwin P., Burtscher L., Dumas G., Lin M., MalkanM. A., Muller-Sanchez F., Orban de Xivry G., RosarioD. J., Schnorr-Muller A., Tran A., 2014, ApJ, 792, 101

Davies R. I., Maciejewski W., Hicks E. K. S., Tacconi L. J.,Genzel R., Engel H., 2009, ApJ, 702, 114

de Lorenzo-Caceres A., Falcon-Barroso J., Vazdekis A.,2013, MNRAS, 431, 2397

Diniz M. R., Riffel R. A., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2014, inRevista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica ConferenceSeries Vol. 44 of Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y As-trofisica Conference Series, Two-dimensional Kinematicsof the Central Region of NGC 2110. pp 192–192

Emsellem E., Fathi K., Wozniak H., Ferruit P., MundellC. G., Schinnerer E., 2006, MNRAS, 365, 367

Emsellem E., Goudfrooij P., Ferruit P., 2003, MNRAS, 345,1297

Englmaier P., Shlosman I., 2004, ApJl, 617, L115Erwin P., 2004, A&A, 415, 941Erwin P., Sparke L. S., 2002, AJ, 124, 65Esquej P. e. a., 2014, ApJ, 780, 86Fathi K., Storchi-Bergmann T., Riffel R. A., Winge C.,Axon D. J., Robinson A., Capetti A., Marconi A., 2006,ApJl, 641, L25

Ferruit P., Wilson A. S., Mulchaey J., 2000, ApJS, 128, 139Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Accretion Power inAstrophysics: Third Edition. Accretion Power in Astro-physics, by Juhan Frank and Andrew King and DerekRaine, pp. 398. ISBN 0521620538. Cambridge, UK: Cam-bridge University Press, February 2002.

Garcıa-Burillo S., Combes F., 2012, Journal of PhysicsConference Series, 372, 012050

Garcıa-Burillo S., Combes F., Hunt L. K., Boone F., BakerA. J., Tacconi L. J., Eckart A., Neri R., Leon S., Schin-nerer E., Englmaier P., 2003, A&A, 407, 485

Goodrich R. W., Veilleux S., Hill G. J., 1994, ApJ, 422,521

Haan S., Schinnerer E., Emsellem E., Garcıa-Burillo S.,Combes F., Mundell C. G., Rix H.-W., 2009, ApJ, 692,1623

Hopkins P. F., Quataert E., 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1529Knapen J. H., 2005, ApSS, 295, 85Laine S., Shlosman I., Knapen J. H., Peletier R. F., 2002,ApJ, 567, 97

Lena D., Robinson A., Storchi-Bergman T., Schnorr-MullerA., Seelig T., Riffel R. A., Nagar N. M., Couto G. S.,Shadler L., 2015, ApJ, 806, 84

Maciejewski W., 2004a, MNRAS, 354, 883Maciejewski W., 2004b, MNRAS, 354, 892Martini P., Dicken D., Storchi-Bergmann T., 2013, ApJ,766, 121

Moran E. C., Barth A. J., Kay L. E., Filippenko A. V.,2000, ApJl, 540, L73

Mundell C. G., Shone D. L., 1999, MNRAS, 304, 475Nagar N. M., Wilson A. S., Mulchaey J. S., Gallimore J. F.,1999, ApJS, 120, 209

Osterbrock D. E., Ferland G. J., 2006, Astrophysics ofgaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

Regan M. W., Teuben P. J., 2004, ApJ, 600, 595Reunanen J., Kotilainen J. K., Prieto M. A., 2003, MN-

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15

Feeding and Feedback in NGC3081 15

RAS, 343, 192Riffel R. A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Winge C., 2013, MN-RAS, 430, 2249

Riffel R. A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Winge C., McGregorP. J., Beck T., Schmitt H., 2008, MNRAS, 385, 1129

Ruiz J. R., Crenshaw D. M., Kraemer S. B., Bower G. A.,Gull T. R., Hutchings J. B., Kaiser M. E., Weistrop D.,2005, AJ, 129, 73

Schnorr-Muller A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Nagar N. M.,Ferrari F., 2014, MNRAS, 438, 3322

Schnorr-Muller A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Nagar N. M.,Robinson A., Lena D., Riffel R. A., Couto G. S., 2014,MNRAS, 437, 1708

Schnorr Muller A., Storchi-Bergmann T., Riffel R. A., Fer-rari F., Steiner J. E., Axon D. J., Robinson A., 2011,MNRAS, 413, 149

Shlosman I., Begelman M. C., Frank J., 1990, Nature, 345,679

Shlosman I., Frank J., Begelman M. C., 1989, Nature, 338,45

Simoes Lopes R. D., Storchi-Bergmann T., de FatimaSaraiva M., Martini P., 2007, ApJ, 655, 718

Stoklasova I., Ferruit P., Emsellem E., Jungwiert B.,Pecontal E., Sanchez S. F., 2009, A&A, 500, 1287

Storchi-Bergmann T., Dors Jr. O. L., Riffel R. A., FathiK., Axon D. J., Robinson A., Marconi A., Ostlin G., 2007,ApJ, 670, 959

Storchi-Bergmann T., Rodriguez-Ardila A., Schmitt H. R.,Wilson A. S., Baldwin J. A., 1996, ApJ, 472, 83

Theureau G., Coudreau N., Hallet N., Hanski M., Alsac L.,Bottinelli L., Gouguenheim L., Martin J.-M., Paturel G.,2005, A&A, 430, 373

van der Laan T. P. R., Schinnerer E., Boone F., Garcıa-Burillo S., Combes F., Haan S., Leon S., Hunt L., BakerA. J., 2011, A&A, 529, A45

c© 2016 RAS, MNRAS 000, 1–15