50
Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 Matthew Melville TFG 26 July 2012

Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Feedback from WorldatWork 2012Matthew Melville

TFG

26 July 2012

Page 2: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Highlights!

Page 3: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

• Performance Pay Focus• Microsoft: A Simplified and

Transparent Approach to Performance Management and

Highlights

Performance Management and Rewards

• Aon Hewitt: Why Can’t (Won’t) We Differentiate? – Ken Abosch

Page 4: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

• TFG Lifecycle

• An “Instant Business Case”

• Practical look at REAL reasons

(Sins checklist...)

Why This Session?

(Sins checklist...)

• Practical Solutions

• Key: What is Reward’s most important function?

Page 5: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Introduction

Page 6: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

A few notes, attributions,

disclaimers, etc....

� Graphs and some slides – Ken Abosch, Aon Hewitt

� Recognising performance – variable pay vs. merit / salary increases/ salary increases

Page 7: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 8: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

“We aim to pay people RANDOMLY!”

“We want to spread pay across everyone evenly, regardless of

performance!”

Page 9: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

HR’s role is to:

•Create focus on•Recognise Achievement of•Reward the drivers of•Reward the drivers of

Organisational Performance

-Ken Abosch, Aon Hewitt

Page 10: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

“The Sorting Effect”

� High Performers attracted attracted to companies that pay for performance and recognise their contributions

� High performers leave companies that don’t� High performers leave companies that don’t

� Low performers will self select out of companies that do differentiate

� Low Performers will stay in environments that don’t recognise performance

Page 11: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Ideal vs. RealityIdeal vs. Reality

Page 12: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 13: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 14: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 15: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The Obstacles to

Differentiated

Reward

Page 16: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Primary Obstacles to

Performance

Differentiation

� Insufficient funding – especially Base Pay

� Skewed performance distributions – “85% are outstanding!”

� “Only strong ones are left!”

� Unrealistic employee expectations – no-one told them...

� Managers lack skills

� Affinity to “take care of” all levels of performance

� Audience:

� Doing more with less...

� A middle-rating is demotivating

Page 17: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Looked at another way... A

Diagnostic Triangle

Ability

• Selection of managers

• Training

• “Quality Conversations” vs. Placation

• Consequences x 2

Source: Adapted from Compensation 10th Edition, Milkovich, Newman & Gerhart

MotivationEnvironment

• Consequences x 2

• “Middle Management”

• Expectations

• Economics

Page 18: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

FundingFunding

Page 19: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 20: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

HeadingSub-Heading

• Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

• Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx• Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Page 21: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights
Page 22: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The

Impact of

Skewed

Distributions

Page 23: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Skewed Performance

DistributionsDesired Performance Actual Performance

Exceeds Most 10% 25%55%

Exceeds Some 20% 30%

Percent of Employees

Percent of Employees

Meets All 50% 40% 95%

Meets Some 15% 5%

Does Not Meet 5% 0%

Page 24: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Skewed Performance

DistributionsDesired Performance Actual Performance

Exceeds Most 10% 25%55%

Exceeds Some 20% 30%

Percent of Employees

Percent of Employees

Meets All 50% 40% 95%

Meets Some 15% 5%

Does Not Meet 5% 0%

Page 25: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The Impact of Skewed

Performance

Page 26: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Skewed Performance

Distributions: Actual Example

Page 27: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The Business Case -

Economics

Page 28: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The Business Case for Differentiated

Rewards

• Economic value > Salary Cost

• If we don’t pay them for their

Source: Michael C. Sturman, Evaluating the Utility of Performance Based Pay, Personnel Psychology, 2003

for their value, they will “Sort” right out of there...

Page 29: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Scenarios

Page 30: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Scenarios

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Page 31: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Scenarios

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Page 32: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Scenarios

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Page 33: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Scenarios

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Base Pay or Variable Pay?

Page 34: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

A Sporty

Research Study

Page 35: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Hot Off the Press

Research Study

� High pay dispersion strongly connected to strong performance yields:

� Higher team / organizational results� High retention� High attraction

� BUT: � BUT: high dispersion in pay must be explainable by productivity and results

� High pay dispersion = higher proportion of high performers

� Focus must be on pay equity – not pay equality

Source: Charlie O. Trevor, Reconsidering Pay Dispersion’s Effect on the Performance of Independent Work, Academy of Management Journal, Forthcoming

Page 36: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

So What?

� 85% more high performers stayed vs. low dispersion

� 80% more were there the next year

� High Pay Dispersion

� Explained Pay Dispersion

year

� 60% High Performers went to.....

High explained pay dispersion

Source: Charlie O. Trevor, Reconsidering Pay Dispersion’s Effect on the Performance of Independent Work, Academy of Management Journal, Forthcoming

� “The Sorting Effect”

Page 37: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Some Solutions

Page 38: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Possible Solutions and

Approaches

Design

� Carve outs� Automatic zeros� Lump-sum merits

� Targeted range

Execution

� Manager selection� Manager training� Manager accountability� Focus rewards on best

performers� Targeted range penetration through market adjustments

� Individual performance –based variable pay

� Independent bonus pool – top performers

� Multiple bonus plans – differing focus

performers� Insist on differentiated

performance distribution

� Extend the definition of reward to include total rewards

Page 39: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Carve Out

Page 40: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Carve Out

Page 41: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Lump-Sum Merit

Page 42: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Lump-Sum Merit

Page 43: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Lump-Sum Merit

Note : A reduction in salary increase cost translat es to greater future funding opportunity and more flexibility – enables aggressive range placement changes

Page 44: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Illustration : Targeted Range Penetration

Page 45: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Improved Execution for Differentiated

Rewards

- Manager Selection- Manager Training- Manager Assessment

and Reward- Employee Feedback

- Selection / Sourcing- Training & Development- Performance Measurement- Recognition & Rewards

“The Engineer Manager” and “Managing the Engine”

Page 46: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

The Logic

� Very few CEO’s target company performance in the “middle of the pack”

� The “Sorting Effect”

� If all our employees are average – how will we outperform the competition?

Page 47: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

“Pay Equity

vs. Pay

Equality”

Page 48: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Some Practical Tips for

WorldatWork 2013...

Page 49: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

WorldatWork 2013? Practical

Tips...

•Travel Friday – latest

• Attend everything!

• 2 Attendees• 2 Attendees

• “Fall-back” planning

• Be prepared to “walk!”

Page 50: Feedback from WorldatWork 2012 - SARA storage/Documents/MMww.pdf• Performance Pay Focus • Microsoft: A Simplified and Transparent Approach to Performance Management and Highlights

Close and Questions