Upload
mariano-dundon
View
215
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Feedback for Interference Mitigation
David TseWireless Foundations
Dept. of EECS U.C. Berkeley
CWIT May 20, 2011
2
Drive for Wireless Spectral Efficiency
• Lots of PHY layer advances in the past 1.5 decade.
• Focus on point-to-point and single-cell performance.
• Recent research has shifted to interference.
The Interference BarrierInterference gets worse as:• density of wireless nodes increases.• wireless architectures become more heterogeneous and
decentralized
Heterogeneous networks
Macro-cell
pico-cell
Tx1
Rx1
Peer-to-peer networks
Tx2
Rx2
Tx3
Rx3
3
What I’ll Talk About
• Discuss several interference mitigation approaches.
• Focus on a common key enabler: feedback.
Interference Mitigation Approaches
• Multiuser MIMO
• Network MIMO
• Interference alignment
5
Downlink Multiuser MIMOmitigates intra-cell interference
6
Can transmit K symbols/s/Hz using K transmit antennas.(degrees of freedom = K)
Inter-Cell Interference Mitigation
Multiuser MIMO can also mitigate inter-cell interference
7
Network MIMOmitigates inter-cell interference
8
Central Unit
Inter-cell Interference Mitigation
With multiuser MIMO, each out-of-cell user to be nulled out costs one dimension.
Network MIMO removes that cost at the expense of additional infrastructure.
Can one reduce that cost without infrastructure cooperation?
Example: Single Tx Antenna at BS
10
• Cannot beamform with one antenna.• D.o.f. per cell = ½ sym/s/Hz (frequency sharing)• Turns out that with more users per cell and frequency
diversity, one can do better.
XX
Downlink Interference Alignment
Interference alignment between out-of-cell and intra-cell interference
11
Fix 2 dim. reference plane in 3-dim signal space, independent of channel gains
21
1
1
2
2
transmission over 3 sub-carriers
! 1; K ! 1 :
(Suh et al 10)
Key Enabler For All Techniques
Timely channel knowledge at the transmitters:
• Multiuser MIMO
• Network MIMO
• Interference alignment.
12
Central Unit
21
1
1
2
2
Channel State FeedbackSuch CSI is typically obtained via feedback.• Feedback overhead:
f = 2 GHz, v = 30m/s, delay spread 5 m s
coherence time ¼ fv/c = 5ms
coherence bandwidth ¼ 200 kHz
coherence block ¼ 1000 sym
• Feedback delay
several milliseconds
can be of order of channel coherence time
Delay is a critical issue in hi-mobility.
Coherence block
Conventional Approach
• Transmitter predicts current channel state based on fed back information.
• Predicted channel state is used in place of true state in interference mitigation schemes.
Prediction is very difficult, especially if it’s about the future.
Niels Bohrs
(or was it Yogi Berra?)
Completely Outdated FeedbackWe ask:
What if current channel is completely independent from the fed back information?
Conventional wisdom:
Feedback is totally useless.
Is conventional wisdom correct?
16
Downlink MIMOPerfect channel knowledge: 2 symbols per time slot
A
B
17
Downlink MIMOPerfect channel knowledge: 2 symbols/s/Hz
No channel knowledge: 1 symbol/s/Hz
18
Downlink MIMOOutdated channel knowledge? 4/3 symbol/s/Hz
reconstruct
19
K by K Downlink MIMO
symbols/s/Hz
......
K antennas
K receivers(Maddah-Ali & T. 2010)
Perfect CSI: K symbols/s/Hz
No feedback: 1 symbol/s/Hz
Outdated feedback:
3 x 3 Case
Phase I
Transmit:
Symbols for individual usersSymbols wanted by 2 users
Phase IIPhase III
Symbols wanted by 3 users
Details on Phase II
Phase III: Transmit any two linear combinations of the three
Information Theoretic OptimalityTheorem:
The d.o.f. of the K by K MIMO broadcast channel with i.i.d. Rayleigh fading under feedback is:
Outer bound:
Physically-degraded BC:
Feedback does not help (El Gamal 78)
X ! (Y1;Y2; : : :;YK ) ! (Y2; : : : ;YK ) : : : ! YK...
...X
Y1
Y2
YK
Extension to Interference Channels
reconstruct
24
2-user MIMO IC with arbitrary # of antennas: (Vaze and Varanasi 11)3-user IC (Maleki et al 10)
Feedback in Information Theory
Shannon 1956:
Feedback does not increase capacity of memoryless channels.
Xmemoryless channel
encoder decodermemoryless channel
encoder
delay
decoder
Feedback in Practice• Hybrid ARQ/ rateless codes:
Tries to achieve the capacity without knowing h.• Prediction
Tries to exploit memory in channel process {h[m]}.
encoder decoderencoder
delay
decoderh[m]
encoder decoderencoder
delay
decoderunknown h
Feedback in Memoryless Networks
encoder
dec 1
dec 2
memorylessbroadcastchannel
delay
delay
• Dueck provided an example of a BC where feedback helpsbut the noises at the two receivers are dependent.• Our result: feedback increases not only capacity but d.o.f. even when noises at receivers are independent.• What is this new role of feedback?
Side Information
reconstruct
28
side info.
side info.
Role of FeedbackOld:• Predict channel.
New:• Learn about side information at receivers.
29
Learning about the past is often easier than predicting the future.
Conclusions• Interference is a central barrier to scalability of wireless
systems.
• Multiple approaches to mitigate interference are emerging.
• New use of feedback is a key enabler for these approaches.
30
Reference
M. Maddah-Ali and D. Tse, “Completely Stale Transmitter Channel State Information is Still Very Useful”, Allerton Conference, 2010.
http://arxiv.org/abs/1010.1499
31