11
DOCTORS ACADEMY Disseminating Medical Knowledge and Skills Globally The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh 4 th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam) (The Edinburgh College Manchester Course) 12 th and 13 th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester www.doctorsacademy.org FEEDBACK

FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

DOCTORSACADEMYDisseminating Medical Knowledge and Skills Globally

The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)

12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester

www.doctorsacademy.org

FEEDBACK

Page 2: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

This course is structured to help improve candidates' performance in the MRCS Part B examination via practice sessions with 'mock' MRCS OSCE stations and discussions with examiners on the pitfalls and problems commonly encountered during the examination process.

Learning outcomesOn completion of this course, it is intended that the participants will be able to:. Describe the knowledge and skills required to pass the MRCS OSCE. Describe the structure of a typical MRCS OSCE. Describe the common areas of failure associated with the examination. Identify their strengths & weaknesses relating to skills & knowledge covered by the MRCS OSCE. Utilise effective examination techniques for an OSCE

A total of 18 candidates attended this two day course. The days comprised of all the individual components - anatomy, pathology, critical care/physiology, clinical examination and communication skills, and clinical and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in the subsequent pages.

The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)

12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester

Page 3: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Course Programme

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

Day 1 Programme08.30 Welcome, registration and refreshments

10.00 Refreshment break

12.40 Lunch

14.30 Comfort break

15.35 Co�ee break

10.20 OSCE examination stations

Communication 1Group 1 Communication 2Group 2

Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 5

Communication 3Group 3

Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 6

10.55 OSCE examination stations

Communication 2Group 1 Communication 3Group 2

Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 5

Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 3

Communication 1Group 6

11.30 OSCE examination stations

Communication 3Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 2

Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 4 Communication 1Group 5

Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 3

Communication 2Group 6

12.05 OSCE examination stations

Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 2

Communication 1Group 4 Communication 2Group 5

Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 3

Communication 3Group 6

13.20 OSCE examination stations

Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 2

Communication 2Group 4 Communication 3Group 5

Communication 1Group 3

Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 6

13.55 OSCE examination stations

Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 1 Communication 1Group 2

Communication 3Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 5

Communication 2Group 3

Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 6

09.00 Format of the MRCS and marking scheme

Mr Chelliah Selvasekar

09.15 How to improve your anatomy

Mr Thomas Redfern

09.30 How to improve your communication skills

Mr Ajay Sharma

09.45 Discussion and OSCE preparation

Mr Ian Hawthorn

14.35 Radiology for MRCS

Dr Rohit Kochar

15.55 Mock anatomy exam models

Mr Pradip Datta Mr Stuart Enoch Dr Ingrid Goldsborough Mr Thomas Redfern

17.55 Close of Day 1

Mr Paul Sutton

Page 4: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Course Programme

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

16.30 Feedback and discussion

08.00 Basic needs in critical care for surgeons

Dr Vidya Kaspandian

10.45 Refreshment break

12.50 Lunch

16.45 Close

Day 2 Programme

13.35 Tips for OSCE’s - the trainee perspective

TBC

14.00 Simulated viva practice

Mr Pradip Datta

09.00 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 2

Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 4

Clinical/Procedural Skills 2

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 3

Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 6

09.35 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 2

Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 4

Clinical/Procedural Skills 3

Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 3

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 6

11.05 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 2

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 4

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2

Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 3

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 6

10.10 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 2

Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 4

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1

Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 3

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 6

11.40 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 2

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 4

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 3

Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 6

12.15 OSCE examination stations

Group 1

Group 5

Clinical/Procedural Skills 3 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 2

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 4

Clinical/Procedural Skills 1

Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 3

Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 6

Page 5: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Feedback

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

StronglyAgree

Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree

Disagree StronglyDisagree

As a result of attending this course, I have improved the knowledge and skills required to pass the MRCS OSCE

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither Agree or Disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

StronglyAgree

Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree

Disagree StronglyDisagree

As a result of attending this course, I understood the structure of a typical MRCS OSCE

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither Agree or Disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

StronglyAgree

Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree

Disagree StronglyDisagree

As a result of attending this course, I understood the common areas of failure associated with the examination

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither Agree or Disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

StronglyAgree

Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree

Disagree StronglyDisagree

As a result of attending this course, I became aware of my own strengths and weaknesses relating to skills and

knowledge covered by the MRCS OSCE

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither Agree or Disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

StronglyAgree

Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree

Disagree StronglyDisagree

As a result of attending this course, I understood how to utilise effective examination techniques for an OSCE

Strongly Agree

Agree

Neither Agree or Disagree

Disagree

Strongly Disagree

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Format of the MRCS and Marking Scheme

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: How to improve your Anatomy

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Introduction to Communication Skills

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

Page 6: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Feedback

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Discussion and OSCE Preparation

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Basic Needs in Critical Care for Surgeons

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Mock Anatomy Exam Models

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Communication 1 A (Breast cancer)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Communication 1 B (Lower Limb)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Communication 2 A (Information giving)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Communication 2 B (Information gathering)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 1 A (Colon Ca)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

Page 7: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Feedback

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 1 B (Base of Skull)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 2 A (Upper Limb)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 2 B (Lower Limb)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 3 A (Pelvis and Perineum)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 3 B (Melanoma)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Radiology for MRCS

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Tips for OSCEs The Trainee Perspective

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

Lecture: Tips for OSCEs The Trainee Perspective

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

Page 8: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Feedback

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 A (Burns)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 B (Shock)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 A (Sepsis)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 B (Respiratory Physiology)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 A (Neurophysiology)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 B (ATLS and fractures)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 A (Suturing)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 B (Excision of Lesion)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

Page 9: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Feedback

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 A (Knot-tying)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

4.5

5

Clarity ofinformation

Relevance ofsession

Delivery(materials/style)

OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 B (Theatre-list prioritising)

Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)

1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor

Overall rating of the course

Excellent

Good

Satisfactory

Poor

Very poor

0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%

100%

Yes No

Did this course meet your expectations?

Yes

No

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

Yes No

Would you recommend this course to a friend / colleague?

Yes

No

Page 10: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

Comments

www.doctorsacademy.org

Feedback

• Very good course, thoroughly enjoyed.

• Very good, thank you!

• Thank you for your time. Very useful course.

• Thank you so much.

• Very useful, I learned a lot.

• Enjoyed group work, anatomy viva style stations and suturing practice stations.

• Approachable examiners, very exam like and informative feedback.

• Very similar to the real exam.

• Very friendly environment x2 and effective presentations and tips.

• Enjoyed practicing on real patients.

• Good idea to allow everyone to participate in the session and also have feedback.

• Very helpful faculty.

• Useful and relevant stations and practice.

• Good exposure.

Page 11: FEEDBACK - Doctors Academy · and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in

DOCTORSACADEMYDisseminating Medical Knowledge and Skills Globally

The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh

4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)

12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester

www.doctorsacademy.org

FEEDBACK