Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
DOCTORSACADEMYDisseminating Medical Knowledge and Skills Globally
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)
12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester
www.doctorsacademy.org
FEEDBACK
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
This course is structured to help improve candidates' performance in the MRCS Part B examination via practice sessions with 'mock' MRCS OSCE stations and discussions with examiners on the pitfalls and problems commonly encountered during the examination process.
Learning outcomesOn completion of this course, it is intended that the participants will be able to:. Describe the knowledge and skills required to pass the MRCS OSCE. Describe the structure of a typical MRCS OSCE. Describe the common areas of failure associated with the examination. Identify their strengths & weaknesses relating to skills & knowledge covered by the MRCS OSCE. Utilise effective examination techniques for an OSCE
A total of 18 candidates attended this two day course. The days comprised of all the individual components - anatomy, pathology, critical care/physiology, clinical examination and communication skills, and clinical and procedural skills - as tested in the exam. The candidates benefitted from attending the course as reflected in the collated feedback summarised in the subsequent pages.
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)
12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester
Course Programme
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
Day 1 Programme08.30 Welcome, registration and refreshments
10.00 Refreshment break
12.40 Lunch
14.30 Comfort break
15.35 Co�ee break
10.20 OSCE examination stations
Communication 1Group 1 Communication 2Group 2
Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 5
Communication 3Group 3
Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 6
10.55 OSCE examination stations
Communication 2Group 1 Communication 3Group 2
Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 5
Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 3
Communication 1Group 6
11.30 OSCE examination stations
Communication 3Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 2
Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 4 Communication 1Group 5
Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 3
Communication 2Group 6
12.05 OSCE examination stations
Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 2
Communication 1Group 4 Communication 2Group 5
Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 3
Communication 3Group 6
13.20 OSCE examination stations
Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 1 Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 2
Communication 2Group 4 Communication 3Group 5
Communication 1Group 3
Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 6
13.55 OSCE examination stations
Anatomy/Surgical Path 3Group 1 Communication 1Group 2
Communication 3Group 4 Anatomy/Surgical Path 1Group 5
Communication 2Group 3
Anatomy/Surgical Path 2Group 6
09.00 Format of the MRCS and marking scheme
Mr Chelliah Selvasekar
09.15 How to improve your anatomy
Mr Thomas Redfern
09.30 How to improve your communication skills
Mr Ajay Sharma
09.45 Discussion and OSCE preparation
Mr Ian Hawthorn
14.35 Radiology for MRCS
Dr Rohit Kochar
15.55 Mock anatomy exam models
Mr Pradip Datta Mr Stuart Enoch Dr Ingrid Goldsborough Mr Thomas Redfern
17.55 Close of Day 1
Mr Paul Sutton
Course Programme
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
16.30 Feedback and discussion
08.00 Basic needs in critical care for surgeons
Dr Vidya Kaspandian
10.45 Refreshment break
12.50 Lunch
16.45 Close
Day 2 Programme
13.35 Tips for OSCE’s - the trainee perspective
TBC
14.00 Simulated viva practice
Mr Pradip Datta
09.00 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 2
Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 4
Clinical/Procedural Skills 2
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 3
Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 6
09.35 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 2
Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 4
Clinical/Procedural Skills 3
Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 3
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 6
11.05 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 2
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 4
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2
Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 3
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 6
10.10 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 2
Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 4
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1
Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 3
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 6
11.40 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 Clinical/Procedural Skills 3Group 2
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 4
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 3
Clinical/Procedural Skills 1Group 6
12.15 OSCE examination stations
Group 1
Group 5
Clinical/Procedural Skills 3 Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1Group 2
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3Group 4
Clinical/Procedural Skills 1
Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2Group 3
Clinical/Procedural Skills 2Group 6
Feedback
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
StronglyAgree
Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree
Disagree StronglyDisagree
As a result of attending this course, I have improved the knowledge and skills required to pass the MRCS OSCE
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyAgree
Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree
Disagree StronglyDisagree
As a result of attending this course, I understood the structure of a typical MRCS OSCE
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyAgree
Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree
Disagree StronglyDisagree
As a result of attending this course, I understood the common areas of failure associated with the examination
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyAgree
Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree
Disagree StronglyDisagree
As a result of attending this course, I became aware of my own strengths and weaknesses relating to skills and
knowledge covered by the MRCS OSCE
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
StronglyAgree
Agree NeitherAgree orDisagree
Disagree StronglyDisagree
As a result of attending this course, I understood how to utilise effective examination techniques for an OSCE
Strongly Agree
Agree
Neither Agree or Disagree
Disagree
Strongly Disagree
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Format of the MRCS and Marking Scheme
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: How to improve your Anatomy
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Introduction to Communication Skills
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
Feedback
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Discussion and OSCE Preparation
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Basic Needs in Critical Care for Surgeons
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Mock Anatomy Exam Models
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Communication 1 A (Breast cancer)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Communication 1 B (Lower Limb)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Communication 2 A (Information giving)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Communication 2 B (Information gathering)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 1 A (Colon Ca)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
Feedback
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 1 B (Base of Skull)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 2 A (Upper Limb)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 2 B (Lower Limb)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 3 A (Pelvis and Perineum)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Anatomy/Surgical Pathology 3 B (Melanoma)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Radiology for MRCS
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Tips for OSCEs The Trainee Perspective
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
Lecture: Tips for OSCEs The Trainee Perspective
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
Feedback
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 A (Burns)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 1 B (Shock)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 A (Sepsis)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 2 B (Respiratory Physiology)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 A (Neurophysiology)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Applied Surgery/Critical Care 3 B (ATLS and fractures)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 A (Suturing)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 1 B (Excision of Lesion)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
Feedback
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 A (Knot-tying)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
Clarity ofinformation
Relevance ofsession
Delivery(materials/style)
OSCE Stations Clinical/Procedural Skills 2 B (Theatre-list prioritising)
Clarity of informationRelevance of sessionDelivery (materials/style)
1 is Very Poor, 2 is Poor, 3 is Neutral, 4 is Good and 5 is Excellent
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Excellent Good Satisfactory Poor Very poor
Overall rating of the course
Excellent
Good
Satisfactory
Poor
Very poor
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%
100%
Yes No
Did this course meet your expectations?
Yes
No
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Yes No
Would you recommend this course to a friend / colleague?
Yes
No
Comments
www.doctorsacademy.org
Feedback
• Very good course, thoroughly enjoyed.
• Very good, thank you!
• Thank you for your time. Very useful course.
• Thank you so much.
• Very useful, I learned a lot.
• Enjoyed group work, anatomy viva style stations and suturing practice stations.
• Approachable examiners, very exam like and informative feedback.
• Very similar to the real exam.
• Very friendly environment x2 and effective presentations and tips.
• Enjoyed practicing on real patients.
• Good idea to allow everyone to participate in the session and also have feedback.
• Very helpful faculty.
• Useful and relevant stations and practice.
• Good exposure.
DOCTORSACADEMYDisseminating Medical Knowledge and Skills Globally
The Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh
4th MRCS OSCE Course (Mock Exam)(The Edinburgh College Manchester Course)
12th and 13th April 2014, The Christie Hospital, Manchester
www.doctorsacademy.org
FEEDBACK