38
Federal Reserve System Audits

Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Federal Reserve System Audits

Page 2: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Audits of the Federal Reserve System

The Board of Governors, the FederalReserve Banks, and the Federal ReserveSystem as a whole are all subject toseveral levels of audit and review. TheBoard’s financial statements, and itscompliance with laws and regulationsaffecting those statements, are auditedannually by an outside auditor retainedby the Board’s Office of Inspector Gen-eral. The Office of Inspector Generalalso conducts audits, reviews, and inves-tigations relating to the Board’s pro-grams and operations as well as to Boardfunctions delegated to the ReserveBanks.

The Reserve Banks’ financial state-ments are audited annually by an inde-pendent outside auditor retained by theBoard of Governors. In addition, theReserve Banks are subject to annualexamination by the Board. As discussedin the chapter ‘‘Federal Reserve Banks,’’the Board’s examination includes a widerange of ongoing oversight activitiesconducted on and off site by staff of theBoard’s Division of Reserve Bank Op-erations and Payment Systems.

Federal Reserve operations are alsosubject to review by the GovernmentAccountability Office. Á

301

Page 3: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Board of Governors Financial Statements

The financial statements of the Board for 2006 and 2005 were auditedby KPMG LLP, independent auditors.

303

Page 4: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

BALANCE SHEETS

As of December 31,

2006 2005Assets

Current Assets

Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 60,030,706 $ 45,970,435Accounts receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,625,907 3,081,520Prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,260,507 2,992,412

Total current assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66,917,120 52,044,367

Noncurrent Assets

Property and equipment, net (Note 4) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,205,386 155,441,553

Total noncurrent assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 151,205,386 155,441,553

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $218,122,506 $207,485,920

Liabilities and Cumulative Results of Operations

Current Liabilities

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,950,470 $ 16,906,350Accrued payroll and related taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,421,666 4,860,572Accrued annual leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,334,512 15,456,484Capital lease payable (current portion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 327,663 270,167Unearned revenues and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 366,304 783,711

Total current liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,400,615 38,277,284

Long-term Liabilities

Capital lease payable (non-current portion) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 108,755 406,188Accumulated retirement benefit obligation (Note 5) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,354,662 813,497Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation (Note 6) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,111,829 6,237,290Accumulated postemployment benefit obligation (Note 7) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,515,301 5,111,365

Total long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16,090,547 12,568,340

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49,491,162 50,845,624

Cumulative Results of Operations

Working capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33,844,168 14,037,250Unfunded long-term liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (14,325,986) (12,162,152)Net investment in property and equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150,768,968 154,765,198Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,655,806) . . .

Total cumulative results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 168,631,344 156,640,296

Total liabilities and cumulative results of operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $218,122,506 $207,485,920

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

304 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 5: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

STATEMENTS OF REVENUES AND EXPENSESAND CHANGES IN CUMULATIVE RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

For the years ended December 31,

2006 2005

Board Operating Revenues

Assessments levied on Federal Reserve Banks for Boardoperating expenses and capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $301,013,500 $265,742,100

Other revenues (Note 9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,508,949 8,520,342

Total operating revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 309,522,449 274,262,442

Board Operating Expenses

Salaries . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 182,239,595 174,523,825Retirement and insurance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,853,297 31,847,951Contractual services and professional fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,944,564 24,695,564Depreciation, amortization, and net losses on disposals. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,058,667 12,954,506Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9,185,840 9,065,329Travel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8,820,503 7,613,280Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,637,765 6,052,617Postage and supplies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,560,368 7,169,829Repairs and maintenance. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,634,459 3,361,179Printing and binding . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,505,470 1,973,594Other expenses (Note 9) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,435,067 7,486,158

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 295,875,595 286,743,832

Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,646,854 12,481,390( )

Issuance and Redemption of Federal Reserve Notes

Assessments levied on Federal Reserve Banksfor currency costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491,962,202 477,087,471

Expenses for currency printing, issuance,retirement, and shipping . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 491,962,202 477,087,471

Currency Assessments over (under) Expenses. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0

Total Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,646,854 12,481,390( )

Cumulative Results of Operations, Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 156,640,296 169,121,686

Other Comprehensive Income

Adjustment to initially apply FASB Statement No. 158 (Note 8) . . . . . . . . . 1,655,806( ) . . .

Total Other Compehensive Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,655,806( ) . . .

Cumulative Results of Operations, End of year. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $168,631,344 $156,640,296

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

Board of Governors Financial Statements 305

Page 6: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the years ended December 31,

2006 2005

Cash Flows from Operating Activities

Results of Operations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,646,854 $(12,481,390)

Adjustments to reconcile results of operationsto net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

Depreciation and net losses on disposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13,058,667 12,954,506

Increase in assets:Accounts receivable, and prepaid expenses and other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . (812,482) (362,385)

Increase (decrease) in liabilities:Accounts payable and accrued liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5,955,880) 3,014,489Accrued payroll and related taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 561,094 308,533Accrued annual leave . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 878,028 1,260,574Unearned revenues and other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (417,407) 316,047Accumulated retirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 541,165 219,328Accumulated postretirement benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,874,539 447,724Accumulated postemployment benefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,403,936 (197,200)

Accumulated other comprehensive income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,655,806) . . .

Net cash provided by operating activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23,122,708 5,480,226

Cash Flows from Investing Activities

Proceeds from disposals . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7,212 2,850Capital expenditures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,829,712) (19,370,223)

Net cash used in investing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (8,822,500) (19,367,373)

Cash Flows from Financing Activities

Capital lease payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (239,937) (249,710)

Net cash used in financing activities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (239,937) (249,710)

Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14,060,271 (14,136,857)

Cash Balance, Beginning of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,970,435 60,107,292

Cash Balance, End of year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $60,030,706 $ 45,970,435

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

306 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 7: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTSAS OF AND FOR THE YEARS ENDEDDECEMBER 31, 2006 AND 2005

(1) Structure

The Federal Reserve System was established by Con-gress in 1913 and consists of the Board of Governors(Board), the Federal Open Market Committee, the twelveregional Federal Reserve Banks, the Federal AdvisoryCouncil, and the private commercial banks that are mem-bers of the System. The Board, unlike the Reserve Banks,was established as a federal government agency and issupported by Washington DC based staff numbering ap-proximately 1,800, as it carries out its responsibilities inconjunction with other components of the Federal Re-serve System.

The Board is required by the Federal Reserve Act toreport its operations to the Speaker of the House ofRepresentatives. The Act also requires the Board, eachyear, to order a financial audit of each Federal ReserveBank and to publish each week a statement of the finan-cial condition of each such Reserve Bank and a consoli-dated statement for all of the Reserve Banks. Accord-ingly, the Board believes that the best financial disclosureconsistent with law is achieved by issuing separate finan-cial statements for the Board and for the Reserve Banks.Therefore, the accompanying financial statements includeonly the results of operations and activities of the Board.Combined financial statements for the Federal ReserveBanks are included in the Board’s annual report to theSpeaker of the House of Representatives.

(2) Operations and Services

The Board’s responsibilities require thorough analysisof domestic and international financial and economicdevelopments. The Board carries out those responsibili-ties in conjunction with other components of the FederalReserve System. The Board also supervises and regulatesthe operations of the Federal Reserve Banks, exercisesbroad responsibility in the nation’s payments system, andadministers most of the nation’s laws regarding consumercredit protection. Policy regarding open market opera-tions is established by the Federal Open Market Commit-tee. However, the Board has sole authority over changesin reserve requirements, and it must approve any changein the discount rate initiated by a Federal Reserve Bank.

The Board also plays a major role in the supervisionand regulation of the U.S. banking system. It has supervi-sory responsibilities for state-chartered banks that aremembers of the Federal Reserve System, bank holdingcompanies, foreign activities of member banks, and U.S.activities of foreign banks.

(3) Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Accounting—The financial statements havebeen prepared on the accrual basis of accounting.

Revenues—Assessments for operating expenses andadditions to property are based on expected cash needs.

Issuance and Redemption of Federal Reserve Notes—The Board incurs expenses and assesses the FederalReserve Banks for currency printing, issuance, retire-ment, and shipping of Federal Reserve Notes. Theseassessments and expenses are separately reported in thestatements of revenues and expenses because they arepassed through the Board account and are not Boardoperating transactions.

Property, Equipment, and Software—The Board’sproperty, buildings, equipment, and software are stated atcost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. De-preciation and amortization is calculated on a straight-linebasis over the estimated useful lives of the assets, whichrange from 3 to 10 years for furniture and equipment,10 to 50 years for building equipment and structures, and2 to 10 years for software. Upon the sale or other dispo-sition of a depreciable asset, the cost and related accumu-lated depreciation or amortization are removed from theaccounts and any gain or loss is recognized.

Art Collections—The Board has collections of worksof art, historical treasures, and similar assets. These col-lections are maintained and held for public exhibition infurtherance of public service. Proceeds from any sales ofcollections are used to acquire other items for collections.As permitted by Statement of Financial Accounting Stan-dards Number 116, Accounting for Contributions Re-ceived and Contributions Made, the cost of collectionspurchased by the Board is charged to expense in the yearpurchased and donated collection items are not recorded.The value of the Board’s collections has not beendetermined.

Estimates—The preparation of financial statements inconformity with accounting principles generally acceptedin the United States requires management to make esti-mates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts ofassets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingentassets and liabilities at the date of the financial statementsand the reported amounts of revenues and expenses dur-ing the reporting period. Actual results could differ fromthose estimates.

Reclassifications—Certain 2005 amounts have beenreclassified to conform with the 2006 presentation.

Implementation of FASB Statement No. 158, Employ-ers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and OtherPostretirement Plans—The Board initially applied theprovisions of FASB Statement No. 158, Employers’ Ac-counting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postre-tirement Plans, at December 31, 2006. This accountingstandard requires recognition of the overfunded or under-funded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan inthe Balance Sheets, and recognition of changes in thefunded status in the years in which the changes occurthrough comprehensive income. The transition rules forimplementing the standard require applying the provi-sions as of the end of the year of initial implementationwith no retrospective application.

Board of Governors Financial Statements 307

Page 8: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

(4) Property and Equipment

The following is a summary of the components of theBoard’s property and equipment, at cost, net of accumu-lated depreciation and amortization.

As of December 31,

2006 2005

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 18,640,314 $ 18,640,314Buildings and

improvements . . . 147,504,169 135,152,735Furniture and

equipment . . . . . . . 47,271,434 39,926,270Software in use . . . . . . 13,681,508 12,415,000Software in process . . . 941,912 575,050Construction in

process . . . . . . . . . . 360,966 13,928,149

228,400,304 220,637,518Less accumulated

depreciation andamortization . . . . . (77,194,918) (65,195,965)

Property andequipment, net . . . $151,205,386 $155,441,553

Furniture and equipment includes $1,230,000 each yearfor capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005.Accumulated depreciation includes $867,000 and$612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related tothese capital leases in the amount of $54,000 and $83,000for 2006 and 2005, respectively.

Construction in process includes costs incurred in 2006and 2005 for long-term security projects and buildingenhancements.

The future minimum lease payments required underthe capital leases and the present value of the net mini-mum lease payments as of December 31, 2006, are asfollows:

Yearending

December 31 Amount

2007 $ 463,4912008 138,2792009 . . .

Total minimum leasepayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 601,770

Less: Amount representingmaintenance includedin total amounts above . . (130,540)

Net minimum leasepayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 471,230

Less: Amount representinginterest . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (34,812)

Present value of netminimum leasepayments . . . . . . . . . . . . . 436,418

Less: Current maturitiesof capital leaseobligations . . . . . . . . . . . . (327,663)

Long-term capital leaseobligations . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 108,755

(5) Accumulated Retirement Benefits

The following information provides disclosure require-ments contained in Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 132, Employers’ Disclosures about Pen-sions and Other Postretirement Benefits.

Substantially all of the Board’s employees participatein the Retirement Plan for Employees of the FederalReserve System (System Plan). The System Plan is amulti-employer plan which covers employees of theFederal Reserve Banks, the Board, and the Office ofEmployee Benefits. No separate accounting is maintainedof assets contributed by the participating employers. TheFederal Reserve Bank of New York acts as a sponsor ofthe System Plan, and the costs associated with the Planare not redistributed to other participating employers.

Employees of the Board who became employed priorto 1984 are covered by a contributory defined benefitsprogram under the System Plan. Employees of the Boardwho became employed after 1983 are covered by anon-contributory defined benefits program under the Sys-tem Plan. Contributions to the System Plan are actuariallydetermined and funded by participating employers. Basedon actuarial calculations, it was determined that employerfunding contributions were not required for the years2006 and 2005, and the Board was not assessed a contri-bution for these years. Because the plan is part of amulti-employer plan, information as to vested and non-vested benefits, as well as plan assets, as it relates solelyto the Board, is not readily available.

Effective January 1, 1996, Board employees coveredunder the System Plan are also covered under a BenefitsEqualization Plan (BEP). Benefits paid under the BEP arelimited to those benefits that cannot be paid from theSystem Plan due to limitations imposed by Sec-tions 401(a)(17), 415(b), and 415(e) of the Internal Reve-nue Code of 1986. Activity for the BEP for 2006 and2005 is summarized in the following table:

2006 2005

Change in projectedbenefit obligationBenefit obligation at

beginning of year . . $ 536,339 $ 140,953Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . 185,483 193,209Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . 45,004 35,964Plan participants’

contributions . . . . . . 0 0Plan amendments . . . . . . . 0 0Actuarial (gain)/loss . . . . 596,114 168,027Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . 8,278)( (1,814)

Benefit obligation atend of year . . . . . . . . $1,354,662 $ 536,339

Change in plan assetsFair value of plan assets

at beginningof year . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0

Actual return on planassets . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0

Employer contributions. . 8,278 1,814Plan participants’

contributions . . . . . . 0 0Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . 8,278)( (1,814)Fair value of plan assets

at end of year . . . . . $ 0 $ 0

308 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 9: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

2006 2005Reconciliation of fundedstatus at end of yearFunded status . . . . . . . . . . $(1,354,662) $ (536,339)Unrecognized net

actuarial (gain)/loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 580,386 (15,728)

Unrecognized priorservice cost . . . . . . . (247,417) (261,430)

Unrecognized nettransitionobligation . . . . . . . . . 0 0

Prepaid/(Accrued)pension cost . . . . . . . $ (1,021,693) $ (813,497)

Amounts recognized inthe financial statementsconsist ofPrepaid benefit cost . . . . $ 0 $ 0Accrued benefit

liability . . . . . . . . . . . (1,021,693) (813,497)Intangible asset . . . . . . . . . 0 0Accumulated other

comprehensiveincome . . . . . . . . . . . . (332,969) 0

Net amountrecognized . . . . . . . . $ (1,354,662) $ (813,497)

Information for pensionplans with anaccumulated benefitobligation in excess ofplan asset:Projected benefit

obligation . . . . . . . . . $ 1,354,662 $ 536,339Accumulated benefit

obligation . . . . . . . . . $ 546,854 $ 278,252

Weighted-averageassumptions used todetermine benefitobligation as ofDecember 31Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . 5.75% 5.75%Rate of compensation

increase . . . . . . . . . . . 4.50% 4.50%

Components of netperiodic benefit costService cost—benefits

earned during theperiod . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 185,483 $ 193,209

Interest cost onprojected benefitobligation . . . . . . . . . 45,004 35,964

Expected returnon plan assets . . . . . 0 0

Amortization ofprior service cost . . (14,013) (14,013)

Amortization of(gains)/losses . . . . . . 0 5,982

Amortization of initial(asset)/obligation . . 0 0

Net periodic benefitcost (credit) . . . . . . . $ 216,474 $ 221,142

Additional information:Increase in minimum

liability included inother comprehensiveincome . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0

2006 2005Weighted-averageassumptions used todetermine net periodicbenefit cost for yearsended December 31Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . 5.75% 5.75%Rate of compensation

increase . . . . . . . . . . . 4.50% 4.25%

A relatively small number of Board employees partici-pate in the Civil Service Retirement System (CSRS) orthe Federal Employees’ Retirement System (FERS).These defined benefit plans are administered by the U.S.Office of Personnel Management, which determines therequired employer contribution levels. The Board’s con-tributions to these plans totaled $334,000 and $324,000 in2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board has no liabilityfor future payments to retirees under these programs andis not accountable for the assets of the plans.

Employees of the Board may also participate in theFederal Reserve System’s Thrift Plan. Board contri-butions to members’ accounts are based upon a fixedpercentage of each member’s basic contributionand were $8,964,000 and $8,617,000 in 2006 and 2005,respectively.

(6) Accumulated Postretirement Benefits

The following information provides disclosure require-ments contained in Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 106, Employers’Accounting for Postretire-ment Benefits Other Than Pensions.

The Board provides certain life insurance programs forits active employees and retirees. Activity for 2006 and2005 is summarized in the following table:

2006 2005

Change in benefitobligationBenefit obligation at

beginning of year . . $ 8,273,831 $ 8,404,551Service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . 230,567 217,421Interest cost . . . . . . . . . . . . 470,256 437,320Plan participants’

contributions . . . . . . 0 0Plan amendments . . . . . . . 0 (196,970)Actuarial (gain)/loss . . . . (603,500) (304,006)Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . (259,325) (284,485)Benefit obligation

at end of year . . . . . $ 8,111,829 $ 8,273,831

Change in plan assetsFair value of plan

assets at beginningof year . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0

Actual return onplan assets . . . . . . . . 0 0

Employer contribution . . 259,325 284,485Plan participants’

contributions . . . . . . 0 0Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . (259,325) (284,485)Fair value of plan

assets at endof year . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 0 $ 0

Board of Governors Financial Statements 309

Page 10: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

2006 2005Reconciliation offunded statusat end of yearBenefit obligations . . . . . $(8,111,829) $(8,273,832)Unrecognized net

actuarial(gain)/loss . . . . . . . . . 0 2,145,920

Unrecognized priorservice cost . . . . . . . 0 (109,378)

Amount recognizedat end of year . . . . . $(8,111,829) $(6,237,290)

Amounts recognized inthe financial statementsconsist of:Liability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(8,111,829) $ 0Accrued benefit cost . . . . 0 (6,237,290)Accumulated other

comprehensiveincome . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0

Net amount recognized . . $(8,111,829) $(6,237,290)

Amounts recognized inaccumulated othercomprehensive incomeconsist of:Net actuarial loss/

(gain) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,422,398 $ 0Prior service cost/

(credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . (99,560) 0Transition obligation/

(asset) . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 0Deferred curtailment

(gain)/loss . . . . . . . . . 0 0

$1,322,838 $ 0Expected cash flowsExpected employer

contributions:2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 274,901

Expected benefitpayments:

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 274,9012008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 296,0302009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 325,7932010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 350,0502011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 364,2652012-2016 . . . . . . . . $ 2,132,108

The liability and costs for the postretirement benefitplan were determined using discount rates of 5.75 percentas of December 31, 2006 and 2005. Unrecognized lossesof $2,145,920 as of December 31, 2005 result fromchanges in the discount rate used to measure the liabili-ties. The assumed salary trend rate for measuring theincrease in postretirement benefits related to life insur-ance was an average of 4.50 percent.

The above accumulated postretirement benefit obliga-tion is related to the Board-sponsored life insurance pro-grams. The Board has no liability for future payments toemployees who continue coverage under the federallysponsored life and health programs upon retiring. Contri-

butions for active employees participating in federallysponsored health programs totaled $9,607,000 and$8,933,000 in 2006 and 2005, respectively.

(7) Accumulated Postemployment Benefit Plan

The following information provides disclosure require-ments contained in Statement of Financial AccountingStandards No. 112, Employers’ Accounting for Postem-ployment Benefits.

The Board provides certain postemployment benefitsto eligible former or inactive employees and their depen-dents during the period subsequent to employment butprior to retirement. Costs were projected using the samediscount rates as were used for projecting postretirementcosts. The accrued postemployment benefit costs recog-nized by the Board for the years ended December 31,2006 and 2005, were $1,963,000 and $155,800,respectively.

(8) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Following is a reconciliation of beginning and endingbalances of accumulated other comprehensive income.

Amount relatedto defined benefitretirement plans

Amount relatedto postretirement

benefits otherthan pensions

BalanceJanuary 1,2006 . . . . . . . . $(1,021,693) $(6,788,992)

Adjustment toinitially applyStatementNo. 158 . . . . . (332,969) (1,322,837)

BalanceDecember 31,2006 . . . . . . . . $(1,354,662) $(8,111,829)

Total accumulatedother comprehen-sive income (loss)

BalanceJanuary 1,2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(7,810,685)

Adjustment toinitially applyStatementNo. 158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,655,806)

BalanceDecember 31,2006 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $(9,466,491)

Additional detail regarding the classification of accu-mulated other comprehensive income is included innote 6.

(9) Other Revenues and Other Expenses

The following are summaries of the components ofOther Revenues and Other Expenses.

310 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 11: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

For the years endedDecember 31,

2006 2005Other revenuesData processing

revenue . . . . . . . . . $4,180,692 $3,788,217Rent . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,450,576 2,433,833Subscription

revenue . . . . . . . . . 716,294 782,743Reimbursable

services toother agencies . . . 599,827 664,755

Board sponsoredconferences . . . . . 0 250,650

Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . 561,560 600,144

Total otherrevenues . . . . . . . . $8,508,949 $8,520,342

Other expensesTuition, registration,

and membershipfees . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,676,871 $2,573,028

Contingencyoperations . . . . . . . 1,087,429 956,476

Public transportationsubsidy . . . . . . . . . 988,950 872,467

Subsidies andcontributions . . . . 706,497 656,150

Meals andrepresentation . . . 529,557 518,640

Equipment andfacilities rental . . . 393,122 336,342

Administrativelaw judges . . . . . . 105,587 268,228

Securityinvestigations . . . . 236,448 184,880

Former employeerelatedpayments . . . . . . . . 19,296 319,461

Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . 691,309 800,486

Total otherexpenses . . . . . . . . $7,435,067 $7,486,158

(10) Commitments and Contingencies

Leases

The Board has entered into several operating leases tosecure office, training, and warehouse space for remain-ing periods ranging from one to four years. Minimumannual payments under the operating leases having aninitial or remaining noncancelable lease term in excess ofone year at December 31, 2006, are as follows:

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 176,8072008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 183,8802009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 191,2352010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 198,8842011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84,218

$ 835,024

Rental expenses under the operating leases were$193,000 in 2006 and $157,000 in 2005.

Commitments

The Board has entered into an agreement with theFederal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office ofthe Comptroller of the Currency, through the FederalFinancial Institutions Examination Council (the ‘‘Coun-cil’’) to fund a portion of enhancements and maintenancefees for a central data repository project through 2013.Estimated Board expense to support this effort is $7.5 mil-lion.

Litigation

The Board is subject to contingent liabilities whichinclude litigation cases. These contingent liabilities arisein the normal course of operations and their ultimatedisposition is unknown. Based on information currentlyavailable to management, it is management’s opinion thatthe expected outcome of these matters, individually or inthe aggregate, will not have a materially adverse effect onthe financial statements. Management believes the Boardhas substantial defenses and that the likelihood of anadverse judgement is remote.

One action currently pending in U.S. District Court forthe District of Columbia alleges discrimination on behalfof a class of African American secretaries at the Boardunder Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, asamended. On January 31, 2007, the action was dismissedfor failure to exhaust administrative remedies. The plain-tiffs have moved to alter or amend judgment on thisruling; that motion is pending. Should the case be rein-stated either as a result of the pending motion or follow-ing appeal, the Board believes it has substantial defensesand intends to defend the case vigorously.

Four additional actions are pending in the United StatesDistrict Court for the District of Columbia under Title VIIof the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended and/or theAge Discrimination in Employment Act. All four arebelieved to be without merit and are being vigorouslycontested.

Five additional matters alleging employment discrimi-nation are currently pending administrative resolution.One case is related to, and likely will be joined with, acase currently pending in district court. In that and an-other case there has not yet been an investigative report.Therefore, management is unable at this time to deter-mine the potential for a materially adverse effect on thefinancial statements. Management believes that the likeli-hood of an unfavorable outcome in the remaining threecases is remote.

(11) Federal Financial InstitutionsExamination Council

The Board is one of the five member agencies ofthe Council, and currently performs certain managementfunctions for the Council. The five agencies which arerepresented on the Council are the Board, Federal DepositInsurance Corporation, National Credit Union Adminis-tration, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, andOffice of Thrift Supervision. The Board’s financial state-ments do not include financial data for the Council.Activity related to the Board and Council for 2006 and2005 is summarized in the following table:

Board of Governors Financial Statements 311

Page 12: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

2006 2005

Board paid to theCouncil:Assessments for

operating expensesof the Council . . . . . $ 109,760 $ 83,811

Central DataRepository . . . . . . . . . 740,003 1,096,062

Uniform BankPerformanceReport . . . . . . . . . . . . . 204,617 202,666

Total Boardpaid to theCouncil . . . . . . . . . $1,054,380 $1,382,539

Council paid to theBoard:Data processing

related services . . . . $3,429,499 $3,572,816Administrative

services . . . . . . . . . . . 183,000 175,000Total Council

paid to theBoard . . . . . . . . . . . $3,612,499 $3,747,816

Accounts receivabledue from theCouncil . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 395,551 $ 277,589

Accounts payabledue to theCouncil . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 54,870 $ 104,864

(12) Federal Reserve Banks

The Board performs certain functions for the ReserveBanks in conjunction with its responsibilities for theFederal Reserve System, and the Federal Reserve Banksprovide certain administrative functions to the Board.Activity related to the Board and Reserve Banks for 2006and 2005 is summarized in the following table:

2006 2005

Board paid to theReserve Banks:Assessments for

employee benefits . . $ 2,380,474 $ 2,072,595Data processing and

communication . . . . 2,161,298 2,106,850Contingency site . . . . . . . . 1,087,429 956,476

Total Board paidto the ReserveBanks . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,629,201 $ 5,135,921

Reserve Banks paidto the Board:Assessments for

currency costs . . . . . $491,962,202 $477,087,471Assessments for

operating expensesof the Board . . . . . . . 301,013,500 265,742,100

Data processing . . . . . . . . 731,999 516,433Total Reserve Banks

paid to theBoard . . . . . . . . . . . $793,707,701 $743,346,004

Accounts receivabledue from FederalReserve Banks . . . . . $ 854,142 $ 145,142

Accounts payabledue to FederalReserve Banks . . . . . $ 12,417 $ 0

(13) Noncash Financing Activities

In 2005, the Board billed a federal government agency$1,096,557 for rent and leasehold improvements. In 2006,the federal government agency provided equipment, soft-ware, and services valued at $392,301 to the Board andpaid the balance of $704,256 in 2006. In 2006, the Boardbilled the same agency $143,772 for rent, and the agencyprovided telecommunication equipment and services val-ued at $124,720 to the Board and paid the balance of$19,052 in 2006.

312 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 13: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Board of Governors Financial Statements 313

Page 14: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

314 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 15: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Exhibit I

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM

Significant DeficiencyDecember 31, 2006

Improvement is needed in Internal Con-trols over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for developingand maintaining effective internal controls toprovide reasonable assurance that the Boardhas the ability to initiate, authorize, record,process, and report financial data reliably inaccordance with generally accepted account-ing principles. Internal controls help ensurethat reliable and timely information is ob-tained, maintained, reported, and used fordecision making.

Appropriate internal controls should beintegrated into each policy and procedureestablished by the Board to direct and guideits operations. Monitoring the effectivenessof internal controls should occur in the nor-mal course of business throughout the year.Periodic reviews, reconciliations, or com-parisons of data should be included as part ofstaff’s regularly assigned duties. In addition,periodic assessments should be integratedinto management’s continuous monitoring ofinternal controls to help provide assurancethat weaknesses in the design or operation ofinternal control, which could adversely af-fect the Board’s ability to meet its financialreporting objectives, are prevented or de-tected in a timely manner.

Board management is committed to im-proving its internal control environment asdemonstrated by its ability to resolve prioryear findings.

The following paragraphs discuss weak-nesses noted in the Board’s internal controlover financial reporting that could adverselyaffect the Board’s ability to produce accurateand timely financial statements. None ofthese deficiencies individually would be con-sidered a significant deficiency. However,the combination of these deficiencies is con-sidered to be a significant deficiency.

Recording Accounts Payable, Accrued Li-abilities, and Prepaid Expenses

During 2006, the Management Divisionidentified and processed transactions andjournal entries to reclassify/and or correctseveral transactions that were initially codedto a different general ledger account or re-corded in a different accounting period. Wenoted that the original transactions were ini-tially reviewed and approved by a supervisor,and all the required changes were not identi-fied during this initial review as follows.

• Two disbursements totaling $11,230, of the115 disbursement transactions tested total-ing $18,473,927, were initially recorded indifferent general ledger accounts or were2007 transactions that were recorded as2006 transactions. One transaction for$5,980 was identified and adjusted duringmanagement’s review prior to year end,and one transaction for $5,250 was cor-rected as a post closing entry.

• Two accounts payable transactions totaling$45,709, of the 21 accounts payable in-voices tested totaling $2,969,595, were re-ceived in 2006 for services to be providedin 2007. These were initially recorded asaccounts payable in 2006. Both transac-tions were corrected as a post closing entry.

• One prepaid expense totaling $11,927, ofthe 19 prepaid expenses tested totaling$1,758,579, was a 2007 invoice that waspaid in 2006 and was initially recorded as2006 expense. This was subsequently iden-tified and adjusted during management’sreview prior to year end.

We commend the Board for identifying mostof these entries prior to year end. However,the Board should strengthen its proceduresfor posting and reviewing all entries to en-sure initial posting to the proper accounts andaccounting period.

Board of Governors Financial Statements 315

Page 16: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Posting Accrued Annual Leave

We noted that the annual leave accrual wasoverstated by $301,600 at December 31,2006, because the annual leave report did notreflect the proper year end information for allemployees. The Board subsequently recordeda post closing entry to reflect the appropriateamounts.

Billing of Accounts Receivable

We noted that the Board did not record ayear-end receivable from the Bank for Inter-national Settlements (BIS) for $157,317 rep-resenting services performed in 2006. Al-though the invoice for the 2006 services wasnot finalized, recorded, and submitted until2007, this amount should have been recordedas a receivable at December 31, 2006. As aresult of our audit, the Board recorded a postclosing entry for this amount.

Monitoring Miscellaneous Receivables

During our audit, we noted that the Boarddoes not have specific policies and proce-dures for monitoring miscellaneous receiv-ables related to relocation expenses to deter-mine if amounts are considered collectibleand appropriately recorded. As a result of ouraudit, the Board recorded post closing entriesto write off three accounts receivablesamounting to $105,599 for relocation ex-penses that were not considered collectible.

Recording Property Transactions

During our audit of property and equipment,we noted that the Board inappropriately pro-cessed property and equipment additions andadjustments as follows.

• Two assets purchased for $113,016 in 2006were recorded at an acquisition value of$109,259. As a result, the asset was over-stated by $3,757.

• Three assets valued at $329,375 were putinto service with the incorrect in-servicedates. As a result, the 2006 depreciationexpense was overstated by $25,700.

• One asset was placed in service on March1, 2006 for $811,756, but did not have anydepreciation recorded in 2006. As a result,the Board’s depreciation expense was un-derstated by $20,294.

• Three adjustments related to 22 assets ac-quired via trade-in were overstated on thedepreciation schedule in 2005. As a result,depreciation for 2005 was overstated by$27,294 and correspondingly understatedby the same amount in 2006.

During our physical inspection test work ofproperty and equipment, we noted that one ofthe 22 items inspected, valued at $76,744,was included on the asset listing for theBoard’s contingency site, although it wasphysically located in the Board’s Washing-ton, DC, facility. Our inspection also foundthat the asset tag number for one item valuedat $7,042 was not identified in the Board’sfinancial system.

Recording Financial Statement Disclosures

During our audit, we noted instances wherethe Board needs to improve its preparationand review process for the financial state-ments as follows.

• Assets traded in for other assets were incor-rectly recorded as Proceeds from Disposalsand Capital Expenditures in the Statementof Cash Flows. The entries, totaling$159,519, represent non-cash transactionsand should not have been included in theProceeds from Disposals or the CapitalExpenditures sections of the Statement ofCash Flows.

• In Footnote 4, Property and Equipment,Construction in Process was initially re-ported as zero, and in the correspondingroll-forward schedule, the balance was$360,966.

• In Footnote 7, Accumulated Postemploy-ment Benefit Plan, the Board initially un-derstated the accrued postemployment ben-efits costs for FY2006. The Boardoriginally reported $1,828,000. However,this amount did not reflect the externalactuary’s revised calculation, which re-sulted in an upward adjustment of$134,000.

The Board subsequently made all necessaryadjustments in the financial statements.

Recommendations

To strengthen internal controls over financialreporting, we recommend that the Board:

316 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 17: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

• Strengthen the control process over theinitial input and review of disbursementtransactions to ensure that they are prop-erly coded and recorded in the generalledger. We also recommend that manage-ment conduct periodic training for all rel-evant personnel, including end users, tohelp ensure the proper use of general led-ger accounts.

• Enhance the process for determining theaccrued annual leave to ensure that thereports generated include the appropriateamounts as of the end of the reportingperiod. The process should include match-ing a selection of employees’ leave bal-ances and other information included in thereport to data in the Board’s Human Re-sources system.

• Implement policies and procedures that re-quire the calculation and reconciliation ofamounts due from BIS on a regular basis.Once amounts due are determined, the ap-plicable adjustments should be promptlyrecorded in the general ledger.

• Enhance its policies and procedures to in-clude a documented periodic review andanalysis of all accounts receivables, to de-termine if an allowance is required or if theamounts should be written off. Further, man-agement should also review the accountingtreatment required for all transactions.

• Strengthen its policies and procedures toimprove communication between the divi-sions and the accounting staff to ensure the

appropriate accounting entries for propertytransactions are recorded timely in the gen-eral ledger. The communications shouldinclude, but not be limited to: when theasset was placed in service, the cost of theasset, the asset’s location and tag number,and any additional information necessaryfor the accounting division to make theappropriate entries. The Board should alsoenhance its review and approval proce-dures over property transactions to ensurethat the appropriate entries have beenrecorded.

• Strengthen its process over the preparationand review of the financial statements toensure information is accurately reported.

Management’s Response

KPMG offers six recommendations aimed atstrengthening the Board’s internal controlsover financial reporting. In its discussion ofthese recommendations and the supportingaudit findings, KPMG does not consider anyindividual finding to be a significant defi-ciency. In combination, however, KPMGconcludes that the audit findings represent asignificant deficiency. While managementdoes not concur with this conclusion, we doagree that KPMG’s recommendations willstrengthen the Board’s system of internalcontrols, and we will implement the recom-mended actions.

Board of Governors Financial Statements 317

Page 18: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Exhibit II

BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEMSTATUS OF PRIOR YEAR REPORTABLE CONDITION

December 31, 2006

Reported Issue Prior Year Recommendation 2006 Status

Improvement is needed in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Control over accountspayable and accruedliabilities

1. Establish policies and procedures for process-ing year-end accounts payables and accruals toinclude the requirements for management toreview and approve all entries and supportingdocuments before they are recorded. Manage-ment should also perform a review of the year-end accounts payable listings and subsequentdisbursements to ensure that the transactionsreported at year end are appropriately stated.Further, a reconciliation of the GSA accountshould be performed timely, to identify anydiscrepancies on the invoices received.

Significant Deficiency(see revised comment inExhibit I).

Control of Census Data 2. Confirm the data used by the actuary in thepension liability calculation prior to recordingthe entries in the general ledger.

Completed.

3. Implement recommendations made by the OIGin their report titled “Evaluation of ServiceCredit Computations.” This would includeperforming periodic reconciliations of the cen-sus data between the Board’s system and thedata used by the actuary; reducing or eliminat-ing the number of data transcriptions; requiringautomated verifications for all census datatransmissions; and updating the existing ser-vice credit form to clearly document all priorgovernment service.

Substantially resolved.See revised comment inthe 2006 managementletter.

318 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 19: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Board of Governors Financial Statements 319

Page 20: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital
Page 21: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Federal Reserve BanksCombined Financial Statements

The combined financial statements of the Federal Reserve Banks were auditedby PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, independent auditors, for the years endedDecember 31, 2006 and 2005.

Report of Independent Auditors

To the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Systemand the Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Banks:

We have audited the accompanying combined statements of condition of theFederal Reserve Banks (the ‘‘Reserve Banks’’) as of December 31, 2006 and 2005,and the related combined statements of income and changes in capital for the yearsthen ended, which have been prepared in conformity with the accounting prin-ciples, policies, and practices established by the Board of Governors of the FederalReserve System. These combined financial statements are the responsibility of theReserve Banks’ management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesecombined financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generallyaccepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan andperform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the combinedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examin-ing, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in thefinancial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principlesused and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating theoverall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide areasonable basis for our opinion.

As described in Note 3, these combined financial statements were prepared inconformity with the accounting principles, policies, and practices established bythe Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. These principles, policies,and practices, which were designed to meet the specialized accounting andreporting needs of the Federal Reserve System, are set forth in the FinancialAccounting Manual for Federal Reserve Banks and constitute a comprehensivebasis of accounting other than accounting principles generally accepted in theUnited States of America.

In our opinion, the combined financial statements referred to above presentfairly, in all material respects, the combined financial position of the ReserveBanks as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, and the combined results of theiroperations for the years then ended, on the basis of accounting described in Note 3.

March 30, 2007Washington, D.C.

321

Page 22: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKSCOMBINED STATEMENTS OF CONDITION

(in millions)December 31,

Assets 2006 2005

Gold certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 11,037 $ 11,039Special drawing rights certificates . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,200 2,200Coin . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 801 686Items in process of collection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,486 5,930Loans to depository institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 72Securities purchased under agreements to resell . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40,750 46,750U.S. government securities, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 783,619 750,202Investments denominated in foreign currencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20,482 18,928Accrued interest receivable . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6,761 5,874Bank premises and equipment, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,376 2,252Other assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,785 3,394

Total assets . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $873,364 $847,327

Liabilities and Capital

LiabilitiesFederal Reserve notes outstanding, net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $783,019 $758,359Securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,615 30,505Deposits

Depository institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18,699 19,043U.S. Treasury, general account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,708 4,573Other deposits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 349 393

Deferred credit items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,813 5,039Interest on Federal Reserve notes due to U.S. Treasury . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 1,784Accrued benefit costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,314 913Other liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 291 281

Total liabilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 842,716 820,890

CapitalCapital paid-in . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,324 13,536Surplus (including accumulated other comprehensive loss

of $1,849 million at December 31, 2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15,324 12,901

Total capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30,648 26,437

Total liabilities and capital . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $873,364 $847,327

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

322 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 23: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKSCOMBINED STATEMENTS OF INCOME

(in millions)For the years ended

December 31,

2006 2005

Interest incomeInterest on U.S. government securities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $36,452 $28,959Interest on investments denominated in foreign currencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 369 283Interest on loans to depository institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12 7

Total interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36,833 29,249

Interest expenseInterest expense on securities sold under agreements to repurchase . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,342 809

Net interest income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35,491 28,440

Other operating income (loss)Income from services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 908 901Reimbursable services to government agencies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 426 396Foreign currency gains (losses), net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,186 (2,723)Other income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 131

Total other operating income (loss) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2,664 (1,295)

Operating expensesSalaries and other benefits . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,880 1,709Occupancy expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 240 228Equipment expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212 198Assessments by the Board of Governors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 793 743Other expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 835 747

Total operating expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,960 3,625

Net income prior to distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,195 $23,520

Distribution of net incomeDividends paid to member banks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 871 $ 781Transferred to surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,272 1,271Payments to U.S. Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29,052 21,468

Total distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $34,195 $23,520

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 323

Page 24: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

FEDERAL RESERVE BANKSCOMBINED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN CAPITAL

for the years ended December 31, 2006 and 2005

(in millions)

Surplus

Capitalpaid-in

Netincomeretained

Accumulatedother

comprehensiveloss

Totalsurplus

Totalcapital

Balance at January 1, 2005(238 million shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . $11,914 $11,630 $ . . . $11,630 $23,544

Net change in capital stock issued(32 million shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,622 . . . . . . . . . 1,622

Transferred to surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,271 . . . 1,271 1,271

Balance at December 31, 2005(270 million shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . $13,536 $12,901 $ . . . $12,901 $26,437

Net change in capital stock issued(36 million shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,788 . . . . . . . . . 1,788

Transferred to surplus . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,272 . . . 4,272 4,272Adjustment to initially apply

FASB Statement No. 158 . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,849) (1,849) (1,849)

Balance at December 31, 2006(306 million shares) . . . . . . . . . . . . $15,324 $17,173 $ (1,849) $15,324 $30,648

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements.

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks

(1) Structure

The twelve Federal Reserve Banks (“Reserve Banks”) arepart of the Federal Reserve System (“System”) created byCongress under the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 (“Fed-eral Reserve Act”), which established the central bank ofthe United States. The Reserve Banks are chartered by thefederal government and possess a unique set of govern-mental, corporate, and central bank characteristics.

In accordance with the Federal Reserve Act, supervi-sion and control of each Reserve Bank are exercised by aboard of directors. The Federal Reserve Act specifies thecomposition of the board of directors for each of theReserve Banks. Each board is composed of nine membersserving three-year terms: three directors, including thosedesignated as chairman and deputy chairman, are ap-pointed by the Board of Governors of the Federal ReserveSystem (“Board of Governors”) to represent the public,and six directors are elected by member banks. Banks thatare members of the System include all national banks andany state-chartered banks that apply and are approved formembership in the System. Member banks are dividedinto three classes according to size. Member banks ineach class elect one director representing member banksand one representing the public. In any election of direc-tors, each member bank receives one vote, regardless ofthe number of shares of Reserve Bank stock it holds.

The System also consists, in part, of the Board ofGovernors and the Federal Open Market Committee(“FOMC”). The Board of Governors, an independentfederal agency, is charged by the Federal Reserve Actwith a number of specific duties, including general super-vision over the Reserve Banks. The FOMC is composedof members of the Board of Governors, the president of

the Federal Reserve Bank of New York (“FRBNY”), andon a rotating basis four other Reserve Bank presidents.

(2) Operations and Services

The Reserve Banks perform a variety of services andoperations. Functions include participation in formulatingand conducting monetary policy; participation in the pay-ments system including large-dollar transfers of funds,automated clearinghouse (“ACH”) operations, and checkcollection; distribution of coin and currency; performanceof fiscal agency functions for the U.S. Treasury, certainfederal agencies, and other entities; serving as the federalgovernment’s bank; provision of short-term loans todepository institutions; service to the consumer and thecommunity by providing educational materials and infor-mation regarding consumer laws; and supervision of bankholding companies, state member banks, and U.S. officesof foreign banking organizations. The Reserve Banks alsoprovide certain services to foreign central banks, govern-ments, and international official institutions.

The FOMC, in the conduct of monetary policy, estab-lishes policy regarding domestic open market operations,oversees these operations, and annually issues authoriza-tions and directives to the FRBNY for its execution oftransactions. The FRBNY is authorized and directed bythe FOMC to conduct operations in domestic markets,including the direct purchase and sale of U.S. governmentsecurities, the purchase of securities under agreements toresell, the sale of securities under agreements to repur-chase, and the lending of U.S. government securities. TheFRBNY executes these open market transactions at thedirection of the FOMC and holds the resulting securities,with the exception of securities purchased under agree-

324 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 25: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

ments to resell, in the portfolio known as the SystemOpen Market Account (“SOMA”).

In addition to authorizing and directing operations inthe domestic securities market, the FOMC authorizes anddirects the FRBNY to execute operations in foreign mar-kets for major currencies in order to counter disorderlyconditions in exchange markets or to meet other needsspecified by the FOMC in carrying out the System’scentral bank responsibilities. The FRBNY is authorizedby the FOMC to hold balances of, and to execute spot andforward foreign exchange (“FX”) and securities contractsfor, nine foreign currencies and to invest such foreigncurrency holdings ensuring adequate liquidity is main-tained. The FRBNY is authorized and directed by theFOMC to maintain reciprocal currency arrangements(“FX swaps”) with two central banks, and “warehouse”foreign currencies for the U.S. Treasury and ExchangeStabilization Fund (“ESF”) through the Reserve Banks.In connection with its foreign currency activities, theFRBNY may enter into transactions that contain varyingdegrees of off-balance-sheet market risk that results fromtheir future settlement and counter-party credit risk. TheFRBNY controls credit risk by obtaining credit approv-als, establishing transaction limits, and performing dailymonitoring procedures.

Although the Reserve Banks are separate legal entities,in the interests of greater efficiency and effectiveness theycollaborate in the delivery of certain operations and ser-vices. The collaboration takes the form of centralizedoperations and product or service offices that have respon-sibility for the delivery of certain services on behalf of theReserve Banks. Various operational and managementmodels are used and are supported by service agreementsbetween the Reserve Bank providing the service and theother eleven Reserve Banks. In some cases, costs incurredby a Reserve Bank for services provided to other ReserveBanks are not shared; in other cases, the Reserve Banksare billed for services provided to them by anotherReserve Bank.

During 2005, the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta(“FRBA”) was assigned the overall responsibility formanaging the Reserve Banks’ provision of check servicesto depository institutions and, as a result, recognizes totalSystem check revenue on its Statements of Income. Be-cause the other eleven Reserve Banks incur costs toprovide check services, a policy was adopted by theReserve Banks in 2005 that required that the FRBAcompensate the other Reserve Banks for costs incurred toprovide check services. In 2006 this policy was extendedto the ACH services, which are managed by the FRBA, aswell as to Fedwire funds transfer and securities transferservices, which are managed by the FRBNY. The FRBAand the FRBNY compensate the other Reserve Banks forthe costs incurred to provide these services.

(3) Significant Accounting Policies

Accounting principles for entities with the unique powersand responsibilities of the nation’s central bank have notbeen formulated by various accounting standard-settingbodies. The Board of Governors has developed special-ized accounting principles and practices that it considers

to be appropriate for the nature and function of a centralbank, which differ significantly from those of the privatesector. These accounting principles and practices aredocumented in the Financial Accounting Manual forFederal Reserve Banks (“Financial Accounting Manual”),which is issued by the Board of Governors. All of theReserve Banks are required to adopt and apply account-ing policies and practices that are consistent with theFinancial Accounting Manual and the financial state-ments have been prepared in accordance with the Finan-cial Accounting Manual.

Differences exist between the accounting principlesand practices in the Financial Accounting Manual andgenerally accepted accounting principles in the UnitedStates of America (“GAAP”), primarily due to the uniquenature of the Reserve Banks’ powers and responsibilitiesas part of the nation’s central bank. The primary differ-ence is the presentation of all securities holdings atamortized cost, rather than using the fair value presenta-tion required by GAAP. Amortized cost more appropri-ately reflects the Reserve Banks’ securities holdings giventheir unique responsibility to conduct monetary policy.While the application of current market prices to thesecurities holdings may result in values substantiallyabove or below their carrying values, these unrealizedchanges in value would have no direct effect on thequantity of reserves available to the banking system or onthe prospects for future Reserve Bank earnings or capital.Both the domestic and foreign components of the SOMAportfolio may involve transactions that result in gains orlosses when holdings are sold prior to maturity. Decisionsregarding securities and foreign currency transactions,including their purchase and sale, are motivated by mone-tary policy objectives rather than profit. Accordingly,market values, earnings, and any gains or losses resultingfrom the sale of such securities and currencies are inci-dental to the open market operations and do not motivatethese activities or policy decisions.

In addition, the Board of Governors and the ReserveBanks have elected not to present a Statement of CashFlows because the liquidity and cash position of theReserve Banks are not a primary concern given theirunique powers and responsibilities. A Statement of CashFlows, therefore, would not provide any additional mean-ingful information. Other information regarding theReserve Banks’ activities is provided in, or may bederived from, the Statements of Condition, Income, andChanges in Capital. There are no other significant differ-ences between the policies outlined in the FinancialAccounting Manual and GAAP.

The preparation of the financial statements inconformity with the Financial Accounting Manualrequires management to make certain estimates andassumptions that affect the reported amounts of assetsand liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets andliabilities at the date of the financial statements, and thereported amounts of income and expenses during thereporting period. Actual results could differ from thoseestimates. Certain amounts relating to the prior year havebeen reclassified to conform to the current-year presenta-tion. Unique accounts and significant accounting policiesare explained below.

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 325

Page 26: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

(A) Gold and Special Drawing Rights Certificates

The Secretary of the U.S. Treasury is authorized to issuegold and special drawing rights (“SDR”) certificates tothe Reserve Banks.

Payment for the gold certificates by the Reserve Banksis made by crediting equivalent amounts in dollars intothe account established for the U.S. Treasury. The goldcertificates held by the Reserve Banks are required to bebacked by the gold of the U.S. Treasury. The U.S. Trea-sury may reacquire the gold certificates at any time andthe Reserve Banks must deliver them to the U.S. Trea-sury. At such time, the U.S. Treasury’s account is charged,and the Reserve Banks’ gold certificate accounts arereduced. The value of gold for purposes of backing thegold certificates is set by law at $42 2/9 a fine troy ounce.The Board of Governors allocates the gold certificatesamong Reserve Banks once a year based on the averageFederal Reserve notes outstanding in each Reserve Bank.

SDR certificates are issued by the International Mone-tary Fund (“Fund”) to its members in proportion to eachmember’s quota in the Fund at the time of issuance. SDRcertificates serve as a supplement to international mone-tary reserves and may be transferred from one nationalmonetary authority to another. Under the law providingfor United States participation in the SDR system, theSecretary of the U.S. Treasury is authorized to issue SDRcertificates, somewhat like gold certificates, to theReserve Banks. When SDR certificates are issued to theReserve Banks, equivalent amounts in dollars are creditedto the account established for the U.S. Treasury, and theReserve Banks’ SDR certificate accounts are increased.The Reserve Banks are required to purchase SDR certifi-cates, at the direction of the U.S. Treasury, for the purposeof financing SDR acquisitions or for financing exchangestabilization operations. At the time SDR transactionsoccur, the Board of Governors allocates SDR certificatetransactions among Reserve Banks based upon eachReserve Bank’s Federal Reserve notes outstanding at theend of the preceding year. There were no SDR transac-tions in 2006 or 2005.

(B) Loans to Depository Institutions

Depository institutions that maintain reservable transac-tion accounts or nonpersonal time deposits, as defined inregulations issued by the Board of Governors, have bor-rowing privileges at the discretion of each of the ReserveBanks. Borrowers execute certain lending agreements anddeposit sufficient collateral before credit is extended.Outstanding loans are evaluated for collectibility, andcurrently all are considered collectible and fully collater-alized. If loans were ever deemed to be uncollectible, anappropriate reserve would be established. Interest is ac-crued using the applicable discount rate established atleast every fourteen days by the Board of Directors of theReserve Bank, subject to review and determination by theBoard of Governors.

(C) U.S. Government Securities and InvestmentsDenominated in Foreign Currencies

U.S. government securities and investments denominatedin foreign currencies comprising the SOMA are recorded

at cost, on a settlement-date basis, and adjusted for amor-tization of premiums or accretion of discounts on astraight-line basis. Interest income is accrued on astraight-line basis. Gains and losses resulting from salesof securities are determined by specific issues based onaverage cost. Foreign-currency-denominated assets arerevalued daily at current foreign currency marketexchange rates in order to report these assets in U.S.dollars. Realized and unrealized gains and losses oninvestments denominated in foreign currencies are re-ported as “Foreign currency gains (losses), net” in theStatements of Income.

Activity related to U.S. government securities, includ-ing the premiums, discounts, and realized and unrealizedgains and losses, is allocated to each of the ReserveBanks on a percentage basis derived from an annualsettlement of interdistrict clearings that occurs in April ofeach year. The settlement equalizes Reserve Bank goldcertificate holdings to Federal Reserve notes outstandingin each District. Activity related to investments denomi-nated in foreign currencies is allocated to each ReserveBank based on the ratio of each Reserve Bank’s capitaland surplus to aggregate capital and surplus at the preced-ing December 31.

(D) Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell,Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase,and Securities Lending

The FRBNY may engage in tri-party purchases of securi-ties under agreements to resell (“tri-party agreements”).Tri-party agreements are conducted with two commercialcustodial banks that manage the clearing and settlementof collateral. Collateral is held in excess of the contractamount. Acceptable collateral under tri-party agreementsprimarily includes U.S. government securities, pass-through mortgage securities of the Government NationalMortgage Association, Federal Home Loan MortgageCorporation, and Federal National Mortgage Association,STRIP securities of the U.S. Government, and “stripped”securities of other government agencies. The tri-partyagreements are accounted for as financing transactions,with the associated interest income accrued over the lifeof the agreement.

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase areaccounted for as financing transactions and the associatedinterest expense is recognized over the life of the transac-tion. These transactions are reported in the Statements ofCondition at their contractual amounts and the relatedaccrued interest payable is reported as a component of“Other liabilities.”

U.S. government securities held in the SOMA are lentto U.S. government securities dealers in order to facilitatethe effective functioning of the domestic securities mar-ket. Securities-lending transactions are fully collateral-ized by other U.S. government securities and the collat-eral taken is in excess of the market value of the securitiesloaned. The FRBNY charges the dealer a fee for borrow-ing securities and the fees are reported as a component of“Other income.”

Activity related to securities sold under agreements torepurchase and securities lending is allocated to each ofthe Reserve Banks on a percentage basis derived from the

326 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 27: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

annual settlement of interdistrict clearings. Securities pur-chased under agreements to resell are allocated to theFRBNY and not to the other Reserve Banks.

(E) FX Swap Arrangements and Warehousing Agreements

FX swap arrangements are contractual agreementsbetween two parties, the FRBNY and an authorized for-eign central bank, to exchange specified currencies, at aspecified price, on a specified date. The parties agree toexchange their currencies up to a pre-arranged maximumamount and for an agreed-upon period of time (up totwelve months), at an agreed-upon interest rate. Thesearrangements give the FOMC temporary access to theforeign currencies it may need to intervene to support thedollar and give the authorized foreign central bank tem-porary access to dollars it may need to support its owncurrency. Drawings under the FX swap arrangements canbe initiated by either party acting as drawer, and must beagreed to by the drawee party. The FX swap arrange-ments are structured so that the party initiating the trans-action bears the exchange rate risk upon maturity. TheFRBNY will generally invest the foreign currency re-ceived under an FX swap arrangement in interest-bearinginstruments.

Warehousing is an arrangement under which theFOMC agrees to exchange, at the request of the U.S.Treasury, U.S. dollars for foreign currencies held by theU.S. Treasury or ESF over a limited period of time. Thepurpose of the warehousing facility is to supplement theU.S. dollar resources of the U.S. Treasury and ESF forfinancing purchases of foreign currencies and relatedinternational operations.

FX swap arrangements and warehousing agreementsare revalued daily at current market exchange rates. Ac-tivity related to these agreements, with the exception ofthe unrealized gains and losses resulting from the dailyrevaluation, is allocated to each Reserve Bank based onthe ratio of each Reserve Bank’s capital and surplus toaggregate capital and surplus at the preceding December31. Unrealized gains and losses resulting from the dailyrevaluation are allocated to the FRBNY and not allocatedto the other Reserve Banks.

(F) Bank Premises, Equipment, and Software

Bank premises and equipment are stated at cost lessaccumulated depreciation. Depreciation is calculated on astraight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of theassets, which range from two to fifty years. Major alter-ations, renovations, and improvements are capitalized atcost as additions to the asset accounts and are depreciatedover the remaining useful life of the asset or, if appropri-ate, over the unique useful life of the alteration, renova-tion, or improvement. Maintenance, repairs, and minorreplacements are charged to operating expense in the yearincurred.

Costs incurred for software during the application de-velopment stage, either developed internally or acquiredfor internal use, are capitalized based on the cost of directservices and materials associated with designing, coding,installing, or testing software. Capitalized software costsare amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimateduseful lives of the software applications, which range

from two to five years. Maintenance costs related tosoftware are charged to expense in the year incurred.

Capitalized assets including software, buildings, lease-hold improvements, furniture, and equipment are im-paired when events or changes in circumstances indicatethat the carrying amount of assets or asset groups is notrecoverable and significantly exceeds their fair value.

(G) Federal Reserve Notes

Federal Reserve notes are the circulating currency of theUnited States. These notes are issued through the variousFederal Reserve agents (the chairman of the board ofdirectors of each Reserve Bank and their designees) to theReserve Banks upon deposit with such agents of specifiedclasses of collateral, typically U.S. government securities.These notes are identified as issued to a specific ReserveBank. The Federal Reserve Act provides that the collat-eral tendered by the Reserve Bank to the Federal Reserveagent must be equal to the sum of the notes applied for bysuch Reserve Bank.

Assets eligible to be pledged as collateral include all ofthe Reserve Banks’ assets. The collateral value is equal tothe book value of the collateral tendered, with the excep-tion of securities, for which the collateral value is equal tothe par value of the securities tendered. The par value ofsecurities pledged for securities sold under agreements torepurchase is deducted.

The Board of Governors may, at any time, call upon aReserve Bank for additional collateral for the FederalReserve notes. To satisfy the obligation to provide suffi-cient collateral for outstanding Federal Reserve notes, theReserve Banks have entered into an agreement that pro-vides for certain assets of the Reserve Banks to be jointlypledged as collateral for the Federal Reserve notes issuedto all Reserve Banks. In the event that this collateral isinsufficient, the Federal Reserve Act provides that Fed-eral Reserve notes become a first and paramount lien onall the assets of the Reserve Banks. Finally, FederalReserve notes are obligations of the United States and arebacked by the full faith and credit of the United Statesgovernment.

“Federal Reserve notes outstanding, net” in the State-ments of Condition represents Federal Reserve notesoutstanding, reduced by the currency issued to theReserve Banks but not in circulation, of $175,661 millionand $148,152 million at December 31, 2006 and 2005,respectively.

At December 31, 2006, all Federal Reserve notes werefully collateralized. All gold certificates, all special draw-ing right certificates, and $769,782 million of domesticsecurities and securities purchased under agreements toresell were pledged as collateral. At December 31, 2006,no loans or investments denominated in foreign curren-cies were pledged as collateral.

(H) Items in Process of Collection andDeferred Credit Items

“Items in process of collection” in the Statements ofCondition primarily represents amounts attributable tochecks that have been deposited for collection and that, asof the balance sheet date, have not yet been presented to

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 327

Page 28: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

the paying bank. “Deferred credit items” are the counter-part liability to “items in process of collection,” and theamounts in this account arise from deferring credit fordeposited items until the amounts are collected. Thebalances in both accounts can vary significantly.

(I) Capital Paid-In

The Federal Reserve Act requires that each member banksubscribe to the capital stock of the Reserve Banks in anamount equal to 6 percent of the capital and surplus of themember bank. These shares are nonvoting with a parvalue of $100 and may not be transferred or hypoth-ecated. As a member bank’s capital and surplus changes,its holdings of Reserve Bank stock must be adjusted.Currently, only one-half of the subscription is paid-in andthe remainder is subject to call. By law, each ReserveBank is required to pay each member bank an annualdividend of 6 percent on the paid-in capital stock. Thiscumulative dividend is paid semiannually. A memberbank is liable for Reserve Bank liabilities up to twice thepar value of stock subscribed by it.

(J) Surplus

The Board of Governors requires the Reserve Banks tomaintain a surplus equal to the amount of capital paid-inas of December 31 of each year. This amount is intendedto provide additional capital and reduce the possibilitythat the Reserve Banks would be required to call onmember banks for additional capital.

Accumulated other comprehensive income is treated asa component of surplus in the Statements of Conditionand the Statements of Changes in Capital. The balance ofaccumulated other comprehensive income is comprisedof expenses, gains, and losses related to defined benefitpension plans and other postretirement benefit plans thatunder accounting principles are included in comprehen-sive income but excluded from net income. Additionalinformation regarding the classifications of accumulatedother comprehensive income is provided in Notes 8, 9,and 10.

(K) Interest on Federal Reserve Notes

The Board of Governors requires the Reserve Banks totransfer excess earnings to the U.S. Treasury as intereston Federal Reserve notes, after providing for the costs ofoperations, payment of dividends, and reservation of anamount necessary to equate surplus with capital paid-in.This amount is reported as a component of “Payments toU.S. Treasury as interest on Federal Reserve notes” in theStatements of Income and is reported as a liability in theStatements of Condition. Weekly payments to the U.S.Treasury may vary significantly.

In the event of losses or an increase in capital paid-in ata Reserve Bank, payments to the U.S. Treasury are sus-pended and earnings are retained until the surplus is equalto the capital paid-in.

In the event of a decrease in capital paid-in, the excesssurplus, after equating capital paid-in and surplus atDecember 31, is distributed to the U.S. Treasury in thefollowing year.

Due to the substantial increase in capital paid-in at oneReserve Bank, surplus was not equated to capital atDecember 31, 2005. The amount of additional surplus

required due to these events exceeded the Bank’s earn-ings in 2005.

(L) Income and Costs Related to U.S. Treasury Services

The Reserve Banks are required by the Federal ReserveAct to serve as fiscal agents and depositories of theUnited States. By statute, the Department of the Treasuryis permitted, but not required, to pay for these services.

(M) Assessments by the Board of Governors

The Board of Governors assesses the Reserve Banks tofund its operations based on each Reserve Bank’s capitaland surplus balances as of December 31 of the previousyear. The Board of Governors also assesses each ReserveBank for the expenses incurred for the U.S. Treasury toissue and retire Federal Reserve notes based on eachReserve Bank’s share of the number of notes comprisingthe System’s net liability for Federal Reserve notes onDecember 31 of the previous year.

(N) Taxes

The Reserve Banks are exempt from federal, state, andlocal taxes, except for taxes on real property and salestaxes on certain construction projects. Real property taxeswere $33 million and $32 million for the years endedDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, and are re-ported as a component of “Occupancy expense.”

(O) Restructuring Charges

In 2003, the Reserve Banks began the restructuring ofseveral operations, primarily check, cash, and U.S. Trea-sury services. The restructuring included streamlining themanagement and support structures, reducing staff, de-creasing the number of processing locations, and increas-ing processing capacity in some locations. These restruc-turing activities continued in 2004 through 2006.

Note 11 describes the restructuring and provides infor-mation about the Reserve Banks’ costs and liabilitiesassociated with employee separations and contract termi-nations. The costs associated with the impairment ofcertain of the Reserve Banks’ assets are discussed in Note6. Costs and liabilities associated with enhanced pensionbenefits in connection with the restructuring activities forall of the Reserve Banks are recorded on the books of theFRBNY as discussed in Note 8. Costs and liabilitiesassociated with enhanced post-retirement benefits arediscussed in Note 9.

(P) Implementation of FASB Statement No. 158,Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pensionand Other Postretirement Plans

The Reserve Banks initially applied the provisions ofFASB Statement No. 158, Employers’ Accounting forDefined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans,at December 31, 2006. This accounting standard requiresrecognition of the overfunded or underfunded status of adefined benefit postretirement plan in the Statements ofCondition, and recognition of changes in the fundedstatus in the years in which the changes occur throughcomprehensive income. The transition rules for imple-menting the standard require applying the provisions as of

328 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 29: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

the end of the year of initial implementation with noretrospective application. The incremental effects on theline items in the Statement of Condition at December 31,2006, were as follows (in millions):

BeforeApplica-tion of

Statement158

Adjust-ments

AfterApplica-tion of

Statement158

Other Assets . . . . . . $ 3,277 $ 1,785$ (1,492)Total assets . . . . $874,856 $ (1,492) $873,364

Accrued benefitcosts . . . . . . . . 957 357 1,314

Total liabilities . $842,359 $ 357 $842,716

Surplus . . . . . . . . . . . 17,173 (1,849) 15,324

Total capital . . . . $ 32,497 $ (1,849) $ 30,648

(4) U.S. Government Securities, SecuritiesPurchased under Agreements to Resell,Securities Sold under Agreementsto Repurchase, and Securities Lending

The FRBNY, on behalf of the Reserve Banks, holdssecurities bought outright in the SOMA.

Total securities held in the SOMA at December 31,were as follows (in millions):

2006 2005

Par valueU.S. government

Bills . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $277,019 $271,270Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 402,367 380,118Bonds . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99,528 92,827

Total par value . . . . . . 778,914 744,215

Unamortized premiums . . . . . . . 8,708 8,813Unaccreted discounts . . . . . . . . . (4,003) (2,826)

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $783,619 $750,202

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair value of theU.S. government securities held in the SOMA, excludingaccrued interest, was $795,900 million and $767,472million, respectively, as determined by reference toquoted prices for identical securities.

Although the fair value of security holdings can besubstantially greater or less than the carrying value at anypoint in time, these unrealized gains or losses have noeffect on the ability of the Reserve Banks, as a centralbank, to meet its financial obligations and responsibili-ties, and should not be misunderstood as representing arisk to the Reserve Banks, their shareholders, or thepublic. The fair value is presented solely for informa-tional purposes.

The maturity distribution of U.S. government securitiesbought outright, securities purchased under agreements toresell, and securities sold under agreements to repurchase,that were held in the SOMA at December 31, 2006, wasas follows (in millions):

U.S.government

securities(Par

value)

Securitiespurchased

underagree-

ments toresell

(Contractamount)

Securitiessold

underagree-

ments torepurchase(Contractamount)

Within 15 days . . . $ 40,588 $29,615$40,75016 days to 90 days . 180,893 . . . . . .91 days to 1 year . 185,132 . . . . . .Over 1 year to

5 years . . . . . . 224,177 . . . . . .Over 5 years to

10 years . . . . . 67,645 . . . . . .Over 10 years . . . . 80,479 . . . . . .

Total . . . $778,914 $40,750 $29,615

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, U.S. governmentsecurities with par values of $6,855 million and $3,776million, respectively, were loaned from the SOMA.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the total contractamount of securities sold under agreements to repurchasewas $29,615 million and $30,505 million, respectively.At December 31, 2006 and 2005, securities sold underagreements to repurchase with a par value of $29,676million and $30,559 million, respectively, were outstand-ing. The contract amount for securities sold under agree-ments to repurchase approximates fair value.

(5) Investments Denominated inForeign Currencies

The FRBNY, on behalf of the Reserve Banks, holdsforeign currency deposits with foreign central banks andwith the Bank for International Settlements and invests inforeign government debt instruments. Foreign govern-ment debt instruments held include both securities boughtoutright and securities purchased under agreements toresell. These investments are guaranteed as to principaland interest by the issuing foreign governments.

Total investments denominated in foreign currencies,including accrued interest, and valued at current foreigncurrency market exchange rates at December 31, were asfollows (in millions):

2006 2005

European Union euroForeign currency deposits . . . . . $ 6,242 $ 5,424Securities purchased under

agreements to resell . . . . . . 2,214 1,928Government debt instruments . . 4,074 3,561

Japanese yenForeign currency deposits . . . . . 2,601 2,618Government debt instruments . . 5,351 5,397

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $20,482 $18,928

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the fair value of thetotal System investments denominated in foreign curren-cies, including accrued interest, was $20,434 million and$18,965 million, respectively. The fair value of govern-ment debt instruments was determined by reference to

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 329

Page 30: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

quoted prices for identical securities. The cost basis offoreign currency deposits and securities purchased underagreements to resell, adjusted for accrued interest, ap-proximates fair value. Similar to the U.S. governmentsecurities discussed in Note 4, unrealized gains or losseshave no effect on the ability of a Reserve Bank, as acentral bank, to meet its financial obligations and respon-sibilities.

The maturity distribution of investments denominatedin foreign currencies at December 31, 2006, was asfollows (in millions):

Europeaneuro

Japaneseyen Total

Within 15 days . . . . . . . . . . . $ 4,359 $2,601 $ 6,96016 days to 90 days . . . . . . . . 2,378 1,208 3,58691 days to 1 year . . . . . . . . . 2,442 2,213 4,655Over 1 year to 5 years . . . . . 3,351 1,930 5,281Over 5 years to 10 years . . . . . . . . .. . .Over 10 years . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . $12,530 $7,952 $20,482

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, there were no mate-rial open foreign exchange contracts.

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the warehousing facil-ity was $5,000 million, with no balance outstanding.

(6) Bank Premises, Equipment, and Software

A summary of bank premises and equipment at Decem-ber 31 is as follows (in millions):

2006 2005Bank premises andequipment

Land . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 306 $ 295Buildings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,817 1,787Building machinery and

equipment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 393 387Construction in progress . . . . . . . 220 86Furniture and equipment . . . . . . . 1,156 1,162

Subtotal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3,892 3,717

Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . (1,516) (1,465)

Bank premises and equipment,net . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $2,376 $2,252

Depreciation expense, for theyear endedDecember 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 186 $ 175

The Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City (FRBKC) isconstructing a new building to replace its head office.Approximately $29 million of costs associated with theacquisition of land and site preparation for the newbuilding are included in the “Land” account, and approxi-mately $114 million of costs associated with the construc-tion of the new building are included in the “Constructionin progress” account. In July 2005, the FRBKC com-pleted the sale and leaseback of its head office, and willlease the space from the purchaser until the new buildingis completed in 2008.

Bank premises and equipment at December 31 includethe following amounts for leases that have been capital-ized (in millions):

2006 2005Leased premises and equipment

under capital leases . . . . . . . . . . . . . $12 $10Accumulated depreciation . . . . . . . . . . . (6) (5)

Leased premises and equipmentunder capital leases, net . . . . . . . . . $ 6 $ 5

Certain of the Reserve Banks lease space to outsidetenants with remaining lease terms ranging from one tofourteen years. Rental income from such leases was $25million and $23 million for the years ended December 31,2006 and 2005, respectively, and is reported as a compo-nent of “Other income.” Future minimum lease paymentsthat the Bank will receive under noncancelable leaseagreements in existence at December 31, 2006, are asfollows (in millions):

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 232008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 232009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 222010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 212011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $177

The Reserve Banks have capitalized software assets,net of amortization, of $155 million and $162 million atDecember 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Amortizationexpense was $66 million and $55 million for the yearsended December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Capi-talized software assets are reported as a component of“Other assets” and the related amortization is reported asa component of “Other expenses.”

Several of the Reserve Banks have impaired assets as aresult of the System’s restructuring plan, as discussed inNote 11. Impaired assets include software, buildings,leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment. Assetimpairment losses related to the check and cash restruc-turings of $15 million and $50 million for the periodsending December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively, weredetermined using fair values based on quoted marketvalues or other valuation techniques and are reported as acomponent of “Other expenses.”

(7) Commitments and Contingencies

At December 31, 2006, the Reserve Banks were obligatedunder noncancelable leases for premises and equipmentwith remaining terms ranging from one to approximatelyseventeen years. These leases provide for increased rentalpayments based upon increases in real estate taxes, oper-ating costs, or selected price indices.

Rental expense under operating leases for certain oper-ating facilities, warehouses, and data processing and of-fice equipment (including taxes, insurance and mainte-nance when included in rent), net of sublease rentals, was$31 million and $26 million for the years ended Decem-ber 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Certain of theReserve Banks’ leases have options to renew.

Future minimum rental payments under noncancelableoperating leases, net of sublease rentals, with remainingterms of one year or more, at December 31, 2006 are asfollows (in millions):

330 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 31: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

Operating

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 122008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7Thereafter . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102

Future minimum rental payments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $146

At December 31, 2006, the Reserve Banks had othercommitments and long-term obligations extendingthrough the year 2017 with a remaining amount of $336million. As of December 31, 2006, commitments of $219million were recognized. Purchases of $92 million and$98 million were made against these commitments during2006 and 2005, respectively. These commitments are forgoods and services to maintain currency machines, forsoftware licenses and maintenance, for services related tocheck processing equipment and transportation, and havevariable and/or fixed components. The variable portion ofthe commitments is for additional services above fixedcontractual service limits. The fixed payments for thenext five years under these commitments are as follows(in millions):

Fixedcommitment

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $302008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 362009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 322010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 282011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29

The Reserve Banks are involved in certain legal actionsand claims arising in the ordinary course of business.Although it is difficult to predict the ultimate outcome ofthese actions, in management’s opinion, based on discus-sions with counsel, the aforementioned litigation andclaims will be resolved without material adverse effect onthe financial position or results of operations of theReserve Banks.

(8) Retirement and Thrift Plans

Retirement Plans

The Reserve Banks currently offer three defined benefitretirement plans to their employees based on length ofservice and level of compensation. Substantially all of theReserve Banks’, Board of Governors’, and the Office ofEmployee Benefits of the Federal Reserve System’s em-ployees participate in the Retirement Plan for Employeesof the Federal Reserve System (“System Plan”). Employ-ees at certain compensation levels participate in the Bene-fit Equalization Retirement Plan (“BEP”) and certainReserve Bank officers participate in the SupplementalEmployee Retirement Plan (“SERP”).

The System Plan is a multi-employer plan with contri-butions funded by participating employers. Participatingemployers are the Federal Reserve Banks, the Board ofGovernors, and the Office of Employee Benefits of theFederal Reserve Employee Benefits System. No separateaccounting is maintained of assets contributed by theparticipating employers. The FRBNY acts as the sponsor

of the System Plan and the costs associated with the Planare not redistributed to other participating employers.

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning andending balances of the System Plan benefit obligation (inmillions):

2006 2005

Estimated actuarial present valueof projected benefitobligation at January 1 . . . . . . . $4,785 $4,524

Service cost—benefits earnedduring the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . 134 123

Interest cost on projectedbenefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 263

Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 132 125Contributions by plan participants . . 3 3Special termination benefits loss . . . 3 6Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (254) (259)Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 . . .

Estimated actuarial present valueof projected benefitobligation at December 31 . . . . $5,147 $4,785

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning andending balance of the System Plan assets, the fundedstatus, and the prepaid pension benefit costs (in millions):

2006 2005

Estimated fair value of planassets at January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . $5,868 $5,887

Actual return on plan assets . . . . . . . 713 237Contributions by the employer . . . . . . . . . . .Contributions by plan participants . . 3 3Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (254) (259)

Estimated fair value of planassets at December 31 . . . . . . . . $6,330 $5,868

Funded status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,183 $1,083Unrecognized prior service cost . . . . 149Unrecognized net actuarial loss . . . . 1,496

Prepaid pension benefit costs . . . . . . $2,728

Amounts included in accumulatedother comprehensiveloss (in millions)

Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (191)Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (1,301)

Total accumulated othercomprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . $(1,492)

Prepaid pension benefit costs are reported as ‘‘Otherassets’’ in the Statements of Condition.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SystemPlan, which differs from the estimated actuarial presentvalue of the projected benefit obligation because it isbased on current rather than future compensation levels,was $4,522 million and $4,162 million at December 31,2006 and 2005, respectively.

The weighted-average assumptions used in developingthe projected pension benefit obligation for the SystemPlan as of December 31 were as follows:

2006 2005

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6.00% 5.75%Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . 4.50% 4.50%

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 331

Page 32: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

Net periodic benefit expenses are actuarially deter-mined using a January 1 measurement date. Theweighted-average assumptions used in developing netperiodic benefit expenses for the System Plan for theyears at January 1 were as follows:

2006 2005

Discount rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5.75% 5.75%Expected asset return . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8.00% 8.25%Rate of compensation increase . . . . . . 4.50% 4.25%

Discount rates reflect yields available on high-qualitycorporate bonds that would generate the cash flows nec-essary to pay the plan’s benefits when due. The expectedlong-term rate of return on assets was based on a combi-nation of methodologies including the System Plan’shistorical returns, surveys of other plans’ expected ratesof return, building a projected return for equities andfixed income investments based on real interest rates,inflation expectations, equity risk premiums, and, finally,surveys of expected returns in equity and fixed incomemarkets.

The components of net periodic pension benefit ex-pense (credit) for the System Plan for the years endedDecember 31 are shown below (in millions):

2006 2005

Service cost—benefits earnedduring the period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 134 $ 123

Interest cost on projectedbenefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . 278 263

Amortization of prior servicecost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 24

Amortization of actuarialloss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 49

Expected return on plan assets . . . . . . (460) (476)

Net periodic pension expense/(credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50 (17)

Special termination benefits losses . . 3 6

Total periodic pension expense/(credit) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 53 $ (11)

Estimated amounts that will beamortized from accumulatedother comprehensive lossinto net periodic pensionexpense in 2007(in millions):

Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 29Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 95

The recognition of special termination benefits lossesis the result of enhanced retirement benefits provided toemployees during the restructuring described in Note 11.

Following is a summary of expected benefit payments(in millions):

Expectedbenefit

payments

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 2602008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2702009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2812010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2942011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3062012–2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1,764

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $3,175

The Federal Reserve System’s pension plan weighted-average asset allocations at December 31, by asset cate-gory, were as follows:

2006 2005

Equities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64.3% 66.2%Fixed income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34.4% 31.7%Cash . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1.3% 2.1%

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100.0% 100.0%

The System’s Committee on Investment Performance(CIP) contracts with investment managers who are re-sponsible for implementing the System Plan’s investmentpolicies. The managers’ performance is measured againsta trailing 36-month benchmark of 60 percent of a marketvalue weighted index of predominantly large capitaliza-tion stocks trading on the New York Stock Exchange, theAmerican Stock Exchange, and the National Associationof Securities Dealers Automated Quotation National Mar-ket System and 40 percent of a broadly diversifiedinvestment-grade fixed income index (rebalancedmonthly). The managers invest plan funds within CIP-established guidelines for investment in equities and fixedincome instruments. Equity investments can rangebetween 40 percent and 80 percent of the portfolio.Investments, however, cannot be concentrated in particu-lar industries and equity securities holdings of any onecompany are limited. Fixed income securities must beinvestment grade and the effective duration of the fixedincome portfolio must remain within a range of 67 per-cent and 150 percent of a broadly diversified investment-grade fixed income index. CIP guidelines prohibit mar-gin, short sale, foreign exchange, and commoditiestrading as well as investment in bank, bank holdingcompany, savings and loan, and government securitiesdealers’ stocks. In addition, investments in non-dollardenominated securities are prohibited; however, a smallportion of the portfolio can be invested in AmericanDepositary Receipts/Shares and foreign-issued dollar-denominated fixed income securities.

Contributions to the System Plan may be determinedusing different assumptions than those required for finan-cial reporting. The System does not expect to make a cashcontribution to the System Plan during 2007.

332 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 33: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

The Reserve Banks’ projected benefit obligation,funded status, and net pension expenses for the BEP andthe SERP at December 31, 2006 and 2005, and for theyears then ended, are not material.

Thrift Plan

Employees of the Reserve Banks may also participate inthe defined contribution Thrift Plan for Employees of theFederal Reserve System (“Thrift Plan”). The ReserveBanks’ Thrift Plan contributions totaled $66 million and$63 million for the years ended December 31, 2006 and2005, respectively, and are reported as a component of“Salaries and other benefits” in the Statements of Income.The Reserve Banks match employee contributions basedon a specified formula. For the years ended December 31,2006 and 2005, the Reserve Banks matched 80 percent onthe first 6 percent of employee contributions for employ-ees with less than five years of service and 100 percent onthe first 6 percent of employee contributions for employ-ees with five or more years of service.

(9) Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensionsand Postemployment Benefits

Postretirement Benefits Other Than Pensions

In addition to the Reserve Banks’ retirement plans, em-ployees who have met certain age and length-of-servicerequirements are eligible for both medical benefits andlife insurance coverage during retirement.

The Reserve Banks fund benefits payable under themedical and life insurance plans as due and, accordingly,have no plan assets.

Following is a reconciliation of beginning and endingbalances of the benefit obligation (in millions):

2006 2005

Accumulated postretirement benefitobligation at January 1 . . . . . . . . . . $ 947 $869

Service cost—benefits earned duringthe period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 32

Interest cost of accumulatedbenefit obligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 49

Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188 45Contributions by plan participants . . . . 13 11Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (60) (59)Plan amendments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .(5)

Accumulated postretirement benefitobligation at December 31 . . . . . . $1,164 $947

At December 31, 2006 and 2005, the weighted-averagediscount rate assumptions used in developing the postre-tirement benefit obligation were 5.75 percent and 5.50percent, respectively.

Discount rates reflect yields available on high-qualitycorporate bonds that would generate the cash flows nec-essary to pay the plan’s benefits when due.

Following is a reconciliation of the beginning andending balance of the plan assets, the unfunded postretire-ment benefit obligation, and the accrued postretirementbenefit costs (in millions):

2006 2005

Fair value of plan assetsat January 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . $ . . .

Contributions by the employer . . . . . . 47 48Contributions by plan participants . . . 13 11Benefits paid . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (60) (59)

Fair value of plan assets atDecember 31 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ $. . . . . .

Unfunded postretirement benefitobligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1,164 $947

Unrecognized prior service cost . . . . . 105Unrecognized net actuarial loss . . . . . (277)

Accrued postretirement benefit costs . $775

Amounts included in accumulatedother comprehensiveloss (in millions):

Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 85Net actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (443)Deferred curtailment gain . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Total accumulated othercomprehensive loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ (357)

Accrued postretirement benefit costs are reported as acomponent of “Accrued benefit costs” in the Statementsof Condition.

For measurement purposes, the assumed health carecost trend rates at December 31 are as follows:

2006 2005

Health care cost trend rateassumed for next year . . . . . . . . . . 9.00% 9.00%

Rate to which the cost trend rateis assumed to decline(the ultimate trend rate) . . . . . . . . 5.00% 5.00%

Year that the rate reaches theultimate trend rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2012 2011

Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significanteffect on the amounts reported for health care plans. Aone percentage point change in assumed health care costtrend rates would have the following effects for the yearended December 31, 2006 (in millions):

One percentagepoint increase

One percentagepoint decrease

Effect on aggregateof service andinterest costcomponents ofnet periodicpostretirementbenefit expense . . . . . $ 12 $ (10)

Effect on accumulatedpostretirementbenefit obligation . . . 128 (111)

The following is a summary of the components of netperiodic postretirement benefit expense for the yearsended December 31 (in millions):

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 333

Page 34: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

2006 2005

Service cost—benefits earned duringthe period . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 27 $ 32

Interest cost on accumulated benefitobligation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54 49

Amortization of prior service cost . . . . . . (23) (21)Amortization of actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . 22 13

Total periodic expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 73Curtailment gain . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (5). . .

Net periodic postretirementbenefit expense . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 80 $ 68

Estimated amounts that will beamortized from accumulatedother comprehensive lossinto net periodic benefitexpense in 2007(in millions):

Prior service cost . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (22)Actuarial loss . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23

Net postretirement benefit expense is actuarially deter-mined using a January 1 measurement date. At January 1,2006 and 2005, the weighted-average discount rate as-sumptions used to determine net periodic postretirementbenefit expense were 5.50 percent and 5.75 percent,respectively.

Net periodic postretirement benefit expense is reportedas a component of “Salaries and other benefits” in theStatements of Income.

The 2005 service cost contains an adjustment by oneReserve Bank that resulted from a review of plan termsand assumptions. A plan amendment that modified thecredited service period eligibility requirements createdcurtailment gains in 2005. A deferred curtailment gain,which was recorded in 2006 as a component of accumu-lated other comprehensive loss, is expected to be recog-nized in net income in 2008 when the related employeesterminate employment.

The Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement andModernization Act of 2003 established a prescriptiondrug benefit under Medicare (“Medicare Part D”) and afederal subsidy to sponsors of retiree health care benefitplans that provide benefits that are at least actuariallyequivalent to Medicare Part D. The benefits providedunder the Reserve Banks’ plan to certain participants areat least actuarially equivalent to the Medicare Part Dprescription drug benefit. The estimated effects of thesubsidy, retroactive to January 1, 2004, are reflected inactuarial loss in the accumulated postretirement benefitobligation and net periodic postretirement benefitexpense.

The Reserve Banks account for the Medicare subsidiesas a reduction to benefits payments. The Reserve Banksexpect to receive approximately $4 million in subsidies inthe year ending December 31, 2007 that relate to benefitpayments made in the year ended December 31, 2006.

Following is a summary of expected postretirementbenefit payment (in millions):

Withoutsubsidy

Withsubsidy

2007 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 63 $ 582008 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 68 622009 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 682010 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 722011 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 772012–2016 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 476 430

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $843 $767

Postemployment Benefits

The Reserve Banks offer benefits to former or inactiveemployees. Postemployment benefit costs are actuariallydetermined using a December 31, 2006 measurement dateand include the cost of medical and dental insurance,survivor income, and disability benefits. The accruedpostemployment benefit costs recognized by the ReserveBanks at December 31, 2006 and 2005 were $126 millionand $124 million, respectively. This cost is included as acomponent of “Accrued benefit costs” in the Statementsof Condition. Net periodic postemployment benefit ex-pense included in 2006 and 2005 operating expenses was$20 million and $14 million, respectively, and is recordedas a component of “Salaries and other benefits” in theStatements of Income.

(10) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Following is a reconciliation of beginning and endingbalances of accumulated other comprehensive loss:

toDefinedBenefit

RetirementPlans

AmountAmount RelatedRelated to Post-

retirementBenefits

Otherthan

Pensions

TotalAccum-ulatedOther

Compre-hensive

Loss

Balance atDecember 31,2005 . . . . . . . . . . $ . . . $ . . .$ . . .

Adjustment toinitially applyFASB StatementNo. 158 . . . . . . . . (1,492) (357) (1,849)

Balance atDecember 31,2006 . . . . . . . . . . $ (1,492) $ (357 ) $ (1,849 )

Additional detail regarding the classification of accu-mulated other comprehensive income is included in notes8 and 9.

(11) Business Restructuring Charges

In 2003, several Reserve Banks announced plans forrestructuring to streamline operations and reduce costs,including consolidation of check operations and staffreductions in various functions of the Bank. In 2004through 2006, additional consolidation and restructuring

334 93rd Annual Report, 2006

Page 35: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Notes to the Combined Financial Statements of the Federal Reserve Banks—Continued

initiatives were announced in the check, cash, purchasing,and Treasury operations. These actions resulted in thefollowing business restructuring charges (in millions):

Totalestimated

costs

Employee separation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $49Contract termination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1

Total . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $51

Year-ended12/31/2006

Accruedliability12/31/05

Totalcharges

Totalpaid

Accruedliability12/31/06

Employeeseparation . . . . $17 $9 $(12) $14

Contracttermination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Other . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

Total . . . . . . $17 $9 $(12) $14

Adjustments to the accrued liability due to changes inthe estimated restructuring costs were offset against totalcharges. Without these offsets, total charges would havebeen $10 million in 2006.

Employee separation costs are primarily severancecosts related to identified staff reductions of approxi-mately 1,949, including 286 and 292 staff reductionsrelated to restructuring announced in 2006 and 2005,respectively. Costs related to staff reductions for the yearsended December 31, 2006 and 2005 are reported as acomponent of “Salaries and other benefits” in the State-ments of Income. Contract termination costs include thecharges resulting from terminating existing lease andother contracts and are shown as a component of “Otherexpenses.” Other costs include the continuation of anoncancelable lease agreement and associated facilitymaintenance and are shown as a component of “Occu-pancy expenses.”

Restructuring costs associated with impairment of cer-tain Reserve Bank assets, including software, buildings,leasehold improvements, furniture, and equipment, arediscussed in Note 6. Costs associated with enhancedpension benefits for all Reserve Banks are recorded onthe books of the FRBNY as discussed in Note 8. Costsassociated with enhanced postretirement benefits are dis-closed in Note 9.

Future costs associated with the announced restructur-ing plans are estimated at $4 million.

The Reserve Banks anticipate substantially completingtheir announced plans in 2008.

Federal Reserve Banks Combined Financial Statements 335

Page 36: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital
Page 37: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Office of Inspector General Activities

The Board of Governors’ Office of In-spector General (OIG) functions in ac-cordance with the Inspector General Actof 1978, as amended. In addition toretaining an independent auditor eachyear to audit the Board’s financial state-ments, the OIG plans and conducts au-dits, reviews, and investigations relatingto the Board’s programs and operationsand its delegated functions at the Fed-eral Reserve Banks. The OIG also re-views existing and proposed legislationand regulations for their impact on theeconomy and efficiency of the Board’sprograms and operations. It recommendspolicies, and it supervises and conductsactivities to promote economy and effi-ciency and to prevent and detect waste,

fraud, and abuse in Board and Board-delegated programs and operations, aswell as in activities administered or fi-nanced by the Board. The OIG keepsthe Congress and the Chairman of theBoard of Governors fully informedabout serious abuses and deficienciesand about the status of any correctiveactions.

During 2006, the OIG completedeight audits, reviews, and other assess-ments and conducted a number offollow-up reviews to evaluate actiontaken on earlier recommendations. TheOIG also closed eight investigations andperformed numerous legislative andregulatory reviews.

OIG Audits, Reviews, and Assessments Completed during 2006

Report title Month issued

External Quality Control Review of the National Science Foundation Inspector GeneralAudit Organization . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . February

Audit of the FFIEC’s Financial Statements (Year Ended December 31, 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MarchInspection of the Board’s Security Services Unit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MarchAudit of the Board’s Implementation of Electronic Authentication Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MarchAudit of the Board’s Financial Statements (Year Ended December 31, 2005) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . MayAudit of the Board’s Information Security Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . SeptemberSecurity Control Review of the Common Document and Text Repository System

(Internal Report) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . OctoberAudit of the Board’s Payroll Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . December

337

Page 38: Federal Reserve System Audits · 2007. 12. 22. · $612,000 for capitalized leases as of December 31, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The Board paid interest related to these capital

Government Accountability Office Reviews

Under the Federal Banking AgencyAudit Act (Public Law 95–320), mostFederal Reserve System operations areunder the purview of the GovernmentAccountability Office (GAO). In 2006,the GAO completed six reports on se-lected aspects of Federal Reserve opera-tions (table). In addition, seven projects

concerning the Federal Reserve were invarious stages of completion at year-end(table). The Federal Reserve also pro-vided information to the GAO duringthe year on numerous other GAOinvestigations.

The reports are available directlyfrom the GAO.

Reports Completed during 2006

Report title Report number Month issued(2006)

Credit Cards: Customized Minimum Payment DisclosureWould Provide More Information to Consumers, butImpact Could Vary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GAO-06-434 April

Bank Secrecy Act: Opportunities Exist for FinCEN and theBanking Regulators to Further Strengthen theFramework for Consistent BSA Oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GAO-06-386 May

Information Security: Federal Reserve Needs to AddressTreasury Auction Systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAO-06-659 August

Alternative Mortgage Products: Impact on Defaults RemainsUnclear, but Disclosure of Risks to Borrowers CouldBe Improved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

GAO-06-1021 September

Minority Banks: Regulators Need to Better AssessEffectiveness of Support Efforts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAO-07-6 October

Credit Cards: Increased Complexity in Rates and Fees HeightensNeed for More Effective Disclosures to Consumers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . GAO-06-929 October

Projects Active at Year-End 2006

Subject of project Month initiated

Consolidated supervision of financial institutions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . November 2005Prompt Corrective Action (PCA) program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2006Basel II Capital Accord . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2006Financial markets preparedness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . March 2006Financial regulatory agencies’ performance pay systems . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 2006Financial regulatory agencies’ compensation programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . May 2006Hedge funds and federal regulatory oversight . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . October 2006

338