Upload
kamil
View
54
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS] Conference Effective Teaching – A NH Model for Educator Evaluations Irene Koffink Michael Schwartz. February 14, 2013. Evaluation of Effective Educators: Tools that Can Help. Agenda – February, 2013 Managing and performing evaluation - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
February 14, 2013
26th Annual Management Information Systems [MIS]
Conference
Effective Teaching – A NH Model for
Educator Evaluations
Irene KoffinkMichael Schwartz
“Empowering teachers, administrators, policy makers, and parents to increase student achievement.” 2
Agenda – February, 2013
1. Managing and performing evaluation2. Collecting outcome indicators3. A Network Strategy will help provide support4. Demonstration
Presenters
Irene Koffink, SLDS ManagerMike Schwartz, NH DOE ConsultantDean Hupp, Hupp Technologies
Evaluation of Effective Educators: Tools that Can Help
We are building a system to manage and perform Evaluations: Guiding Principles…
• Seek LEA input throughout the process• Build upon existing Educator Information System (EIS)• Operationalize State-wide Model• Enable LEA Flexibility• Provide for a link between evaluations and
professional development• Ensure secure access to protect privacy• Verify privacy of data to ensure LEA ownership
3
Add an Option
“Evaluati
ons”
Evaluation Status
Teacher
Eval Due Date
Classroom Observation
Student Survey
Peer Feedback
………….
EvaluationRubric Comments
Ms. abc 4/1/14 s c ip 3-4/3/3/1/3 Great job at….
Mr. xyz 4/1/14 s ns c
Miss. def 4/1/15 S na Ip
A secure ‘home page’ will display the evaluator’s educators and the status of their evaluations!! You can ‘drill down’ on any component to see the ‘evidence’ or rubric details.
4
Legend:s = started; c = complete; ip = inProcess; na = notApplicable; ns = notStarted3-4/3/3/1/3 (overall score, followed by individual component scores).
Evaluation SummaryEducator: xyz
Domains
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Weight PD
Comments
Learners and Learning x aa% x
Content x bb%
Learning, Facilitation, Instruction
x cc% x
Professional Responsibility
x dd%
Student Outcomes x ee%
Totals x 100%
The ‘Evaluation Summary’ will show you the overall state required ratings! You can ‘drill down’ on any x to see customized rubrics and evidence behind these ratings.
5
View: Learners and Learning Domain (could view all)
Educator: xyz
Domain Strands (customizable)
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Level 4
Comments
Learner Development x
Learning Differences x
Learning Environment x
You can define a rubric based upon models such as Charlotte Danielson, you can design your own, or simply use the state rubric based upon state rules.
6
Hover Text:a. An understanding of how learners develop, recognizing that patterns of learning and development vary individually within and across the personal, physical, social, and academic dimensions; and
b. The ability to facilitate developmentally appropriate and challenging learning experiences based on the unique needs of each learner.
Individual PD Goals and PD Plans
Educator: xyz
Goal:
ProfessionalLearning Activity:
Throughout the evaluation process you can jump to Goals and PD Plans if your district chooses to capture these in EIS.
7Goal Learning Activity Status
Add/Edit
Classroom ObservationEducator: xyz
Date:
Feedback:
You can define screens to capture evidence. In this case the district has configured EIS to capture Classroom Observations. On all screens you can email, print or export the page.
Next Step:
8
Peer FeedbackEducator: xyz
Date:
Feedback:
Load Image:
An example of a page to capture Peer Evaluation information.
9
Name ????Peer:
Misc. Input DocumentEducator: xyz
Date:
Comment:
Load Image:
You can customize the evidence to capture what is appropriate for your district.
10
We have begun the development effort!
11
Demo – in just one minute (or two).
But first…
12
PerformancePLUS provides access to multiple measures and enables collection of evidence that can be used in evaluations. (Student names are fictitious)
In addition to an evaluation tool, we want to helpLEAs gather meaningful measurements
Existing reports allow evaluators to look at NECAP growth – to consider ‘shared attributes’ or student outcomes for a given teacher. (Student names are fictitious)
13
LEAs can also consider student performance changes from year to year.
14
15
We are building state model evaluation indicators into our system.
Moving Forward
• Best practice surveys (e.g., student survey, climate survey, parent survey, peer survey).
• Summary reports (e.g., growth at the school level or multiple teachers at once).
• NWEA and SAT growth factors.
• And we are providing support and training to schools.
16
We have launched a social network for Educator Effectiveness.
17
Users can share knowledge, receive on-line training and contribute to the community themselves.
Now for the Demo! A tool to manage the evaluation process.
18
Demo
19
Questions!!
PLEASE CONTACT US WITH QUESTIONS: Irene Koffink – [email protected]
Michael Schwartz – [email protected]
Dean Hupp – [email protected]