FEB 21'flM

FEB 21'flM

Jnlon 0)1 "tapany of C"i1tprn1* Attention. r. Davit l . Thotapson Post Office - on 513HI Lafayette, Louisiana 7"-'."»

R^nrenc* 1| nao> to vour I n i t i a l Plan of Expl oration and - nvlronavntal P».nort rectWed F>»rvarv 6, 19W, for l *a t * t OCS-r, b<7;" m-l .i7-» blocv* " ! a.i*» * I \ Garden Hanks Area. TM* pi an Include! th. d r i l l ing of elfht w e l l s .

In iccor ia r t f with 30 CFR ?*0 .34, revised D^rafeer 13, -»nd our le t ter datnd January 29, l<t7«, th i t plan * a * been n>tona1nod to t;- connl.-to as o' Krbruarv ? 1 , 19 t«4 i and 1s now K«"-1nq considered for auottwal.

Your plan control number 1* N-153S and should be r*f>rtnCfd 1n yoo- cocr:uo1ra-tlon and correspond< nev concrrnlnn. t M * plan.

Sincerely /our * .

In Pt-ply "Refr-r To; RP-2

(Orig Sgd ) D.W. Solanas

D. W. Sol ana* Real ona 1 SuonrvUor Ruin* and ^ro-luCtôn

bcc: Lease OCS-u 6370 (OPS-4) (FILE *00M) Lease OCS-G 6371 (OPS-4) (FILE ROOM)

LQPi-A w/Publ1c Info. Copy of th* plan and ER (PUBLIC RECORDS ROOM) 00-2

14HekMtdoost:gtJ:*/9/M 01*k 3a

. Union Oil and Gas Division: Gulf Region

Union Oil Company of California -P O Box 51388. OCS. Lafayette. Louisiana * ,05 Telephone (318) 232-9724

union February 1, 1984

United States Department of the In te r io r

Minerals Management Service P. 0. Box 7944 Metair ie, Louisiana 70010

ATTENTION: Mr. 0. W. Solanas

Gentlemen: RE: Pian of Exploration OCS-G Leases 6370 and 6371 Wells A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412 Field

Enclosed fo r your approval i s Union Oil Company of Cal i forn ia 's Plan of Explorat ion for OCS-G Leases 6370 and 6371, Wells A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H, Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412 Fie ld. As directed, f i v e (5) of the nine (9) copies attached include proprietary infonnat ion.

Yours very t r u l y ,

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALTTORN IA

David E. Thompson DISTRICT DRILLING SUPERINTENDENT

DWB/DET/jbh

ATTACHMENTS

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA PLAN OF EXPLORATION

i OCS-G LEASES 6370 AND 6371 WELLS A, B, C, 0, E, F, G, AND H

GARDEN BANKS BLOCKS 411 AND 412 FIELDS

GENERAL

In "accordance wi th "the Oil and Gas Operating Regulation's 30 CFR 250.34, ameboid September 14, 1979, and wi th the Outer Continental Shelf Land Acts 'Amendments of 1978, Public Law 95-372, Union Oil Company of Cal i fornia respectful ly submits t^.a fol lowing I n i t i a l Plan of Exploration for approval.

SECTION 250 34-1 ( a ) ( l ) ( i )

Drilling operations 1n Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412, Leases OCS-G 6370 and 6371 will begin on or about April 1, 1984. This start up date will be dependent on rig availability. If the wells are drilled as planned and the drilling program is continuous, this project should take 720 days to complete. A breakdown of the estimated time to drill each well is as follows:

OCS-•G 6370 Well A - 90 Days ocs--G 6371 Well B - 90 Days ocs--G 6370 Well C • 90 Days ocs-•G 6371 Well D - 90 Days ocs--G 6371 Well E - 90 Days ocs-•G 6371 Well F - 90 Days ocs-•G 6371 Well G - 90 Days ocs-•G 6371 Well H - 90 Days

720 Oajs

SECTION 250.34-1 ( a ) ( l ) ( i i )

The wells w i l l be d r i l l e d with a f l oa te r r i g , Zapata Off-Shore Company's R1g Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i g (see Attachment, I ) . This r i g 1s a d lese l -e lect r lc d r i l l i n g uni t which 1s equipped with pans/sumps to co l lec t pol lutants. The pollutants w i l l be contained and properly disposed of .

The d r i l l i n g operations w i l l be serviced from Union's Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i t y , Louisiana. This f a c i l i t y , comprised of approximately six (6) acres, is located adjacent to the Vermilion River 1/2 mile north of the intersection of the Intracoastal Canal and the Vermilion River. The f a c i l i t y consists of an o f f i ce complex, pipe yard, fuel and storage tanks, loading and unloading dock, and general storage area for production and d r i l l i n g equipment and supplies. Union 011 Company of Cal i forn ia maintains a support transportat ion pool consist ing of six (6) hel icopters and eleven (11) offshore boats. Base personnel are on 24-hour duty and are 1n communication (telephone/radio) with a l l offshore manned platforms and d r i l l i n g r igs (see Attachment I I ) .

Union 011 Company of Cal i fornia has f i l e d an 011 Spi l l Contingency Plan with the United States Department of the In te r i o r , Minerals Management Service 1n accordance wi th OCS Order No. 7. This plan contains the names and telephone numbers of company personnel who w i l l form an emergency response team 1n the event of an o i l s p i l l . This plan contains procedures for reporting a s p i l l and for responding to a reported s p i l l .

PLAN OF EXPLORATION OCS-G LEASES 6370 AND 6371 WELLS A, B, C, D, E, F, G, AND H

GARDEN BANKS BLOCKS 411 AND 412 FIELDS (Cont'd.) Page -2 -

SECTION 250.34-1 (a ) (1 ) (H) (Cont'd.) Union Oil Conpany of Cal i fornia is a member of Clean Gulf Associates. This association provides for the purchase and maintenance' of equipment and mateHals fo r use by l i s members in cleaning up of an oi.1 s p i l l . Equipment 1s presently located at Galveston and Freeport, Texas; Cameron, Intracoastal City, fcrand I s l e , and Venice, Louisiana. Some of the equipment avai lable includes a shallow water skimmer system with a 40-barrel storage capacity, a fast response opert'sea and bay system with two (2) 180-barrel tanks used 1n skimming and stor ing, and a high volume open sea skimmer with 1,000-barrel storage capaci ty. The amount of time required to get to the s p i l l area w i l l vary on locat ion of work boats fo r immediate charter. This time may vary anywhere from a minimum of f i ve (5) hours to a maximum of 24 hours.

SECTION 250.34-1 ( a ) ( i i i ) AND 250.34-1 (a)(v)

A Shallow Hazards D r i l l i ng Report (see Attachments I I I . IV, V, V I , V I I , V I I I , IX, and X) 1s enclosed for each we l l . The report includes a Shallow D r i l l i n g Hazards Statement, an Archaeological Statement and a Structure Map indicat ing the well locat ions. The Multi-Sensor Engineerinc Survey (Shallow Hazards Survey) of Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412 was mailed February 1 , 1984 to the Minerals Manav. ment Service 1n Meta i r ie , Louisiana. A copy of the high resolut ion survey data from the two l ines closest to the proposed well locations 1s a-tached to the copy of th is Plan of Exploration to the Minerals Management Service 1n Lake Charles, Louisiana.

SECTION 250.34-1 (a)(1v)

OCS-G Leases 6370 and 6371, Wells A, S, C, D, E, F, G, and H will be drilled 1n Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412 ?.s- per the following table which gives the surface and bottom hole location, the true vertical depth, and the measured depth for each wel 1:

LEASE AND WELL SURFACE AND BOTTOM HOLE LOCATION TVD AND MD

OCS-G 6370 Well A 1,250' FEL and 7,500' FSL of Garden Banks Block 411 14,500' OCS-G 6371 Well B 3,100' FWL and 6,650' FNL of Garden Banks Block 412 14,500' OCS-G 6370 Well C 850' FEL and 4,300' FSL of Garden Banks Block 411 14,900' OCS-G 6371 Well D 3,600' FWL and 4,000' FNL of Garden Banks Block 412 14,500' OCS-G 6371 Well E 3,400' FEL and 6,100' FNL of Garden Banks Block 412 15,000' OCS-G 6371 Wel 1 r 2,650' FEL and 5,900' FSL of Garden Banks Block 412 15,000' OCS-G 6371 Well G 3,300' FEL and 3,400' FSL of Garden Banks Block 412 15,000' OCS-G 6371 Well H 6,500' FEL and 2,800' FSL or Garden Banks Block 412 15,000'

Attachment XI 1s a plat which shows the proposed surface and bottom hole location for each well detailed 1n this Initial Plan of Exploration.

Attachment I I shows Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412 relative to the shoreline of Louisiana.

The water depth at the proposed well locations is •1,270-1,520'.

PLAN OF EXPLORATION OCS-G LEASES 6370 AND 6371 WELLS A, B, C, D, EJ F, G. AND H GARDEN BANKS BLOCKS 411 AND 412 FIELDS (Cont'd.) Page -3 -

SECTION 250.34-1 U ) ( v i )

Attainment XI I i s a detai led l i s t of mud components and addi t ives, inclu< the doipmon name of each.

In accordance wi th Air Quality Regulations 30 CFR 250 57 an Ai r Qui 1 i ty Statement fo r each well is attached (see Attachments X I I I , XIV, XV, x v i , XVII, XVI I I , XIX, and XX).

Attachment XXI is the Consistency Cer t i f i ca t ion Statement required by th Coastal Zone Management Agency.

SECTION 250.34-1 (a ) (2 ) ( i )

An Environmental Report (see Attachment XXII) is submitted ^ * « ^ * ^ e wi th the guidelines established for preparing Outer Continental Shelf Environmental Reports and pursuant to the provisions of 30 CFR Section 2 J 0 . 3 4 - J .

DWB/jbh 01/30/84

ATTACHMENT I

S e m i s u b m e r s i b l e

ZAPATA LEXINGTON Nomina l water d e p t h ra t ing 2 ,000 '

Hul l—Dimens ons

Registered

Overall Length Overall Width Depth Operating Draft Natural

Heave Period Natural

Pitch Period Natural

Roll Period Cranes

Anchoring System

Towing Speed in Calm Sea

Storage

Drilling Water Potable Water Fuel Oil Liquid Mud Total F k Mud

and Cement Sack Storage Sewage Treating

System Desalinization

Unit Heliport

Quarters Personnel

Survival

Semisubmersitle with six stabilizing columns U.S.A. Built 1976 at Avondale Shipyard, New Orleans. Louisiana 260' 200' 80'

43'

21 sec

30 sec

2 A sec One Manitowoc Model 135. 120' boom. 55 ton capacity at 30' radius One Manitowoc Model 135. 80' boom, 56 ton capacity at 30' radius One Mam'.owoc Model 70. 110' boom. 28 ton capacity at 30' radius Eight Vincinay Offdrill 40.000 Ib anchors with eight 2.500' lengths of 2 % " steel stud length chain and eight 4.500' lengths of 2 V wire rope Four Skagit double drum wildcat windlasses rated at 450 000 lb tension with release up to 900.000 lb tension

8 knots witn two 8,000 hp -,ea tugs

8.800 bbls 1.325 bbls 6.900 bbls 1.720 bbls

10.200 cu ft 6.000 sa' KS

Red Fox. 5.000 GPD

1 5.000 GPD capacity Designed to accommodate S-61 helicopter Quarters for 84 persors

Two Br-jcker survival capsules, one seH-ngnting life boat

Dr i l l i ng Equipment

Drawworks

Main Power Plant

Pumps

Rotary Riser Pipe

Equipment

BOP Equipment

Substructure

Derrick

Pipe Racking System

Drill String Compensator Sysiem

Mud Mixing Punps

Cementing Unit Drill Collars and

Drill Pipe

Rated to 25.000' Oilwell Model E-3000 driven by two EMD D79MB dc electric motors rated at 800 hp each

Three EMD-16-645-E8 diesel engines rated at 1.950 bhp at 900 rpm with three EMD Model A-2C-N6 ac generators ABS rated and cer tified for i 400 kw Ross Hill SCR system Two Oilwell A l 700-PT triplex pumps, each driven by two EMD D79MD electric motors OP well 49 V

2.000' of 2 . " OD x 20" ID, 45' stroke slip |Oint; riser tensioning system by Rucker Cameron 18%" single stack system with two 10,000 psi wp Cameron type U double ram preventers, and two Rucker-Shaffer 21 Vi" spherical preventers Derrick Mfg welded rigid frame to support 160' dernck 160' x 40' x 40' designed to accommodate a motion compen sator and automated pipe racking system

BJ three-arm electro-hydraulic vertical racking system

Rucker-Shaffer 13' stroke

Five 6 x 8' centrifugals Halliburton 9 ' / 2 OD x 3 ID x 31 collars; 8' OD x 2 % " I D x 31 collars. 6 ' V O D x 2% ID x 3V collars; 5 OD. 19 50 lb Grade E. Range 2 5 OD. 19 50 lb . Grade G-105. Range 2

ZAPATA LEXINGTON

. i'l ) 'Sit *# , • V

ELEVATION

R - • i — — - — • — i • - •. ^—r\ / • - i . t o . r ; r f t f t w u l t « i l l f ] • T | r . , t T H J T - « V • * s 4 . ^ V ~ « * ~

. * = ' i — * - i r- i » •--«sw- —i—,+—•-> W •* • C T T V — h m

y i?

- - fe J - > - -

N* - - - 3 „ I f ̂ «/3

-| - 4 *

Ops few

V - ' - ^ i v . v . • ^ - - J • • * • «(

- i., r i r ^3' ' "*" . ' J H • - - — v j •'

T^"*"*v A T 1 •T-^l~Zjp—+z i- it torn » t_-T

*M> M « . * . I U J - . _ . _ - . . J • •

u - - .- • - "h i ' • - • < - » - i '

, ̂ .* » « • .

I „ . — — ^ ^ J " - * J *" r I ** - - ' ;

• ^ n

- . . J . •

WATER DEPTH 1270'-1520' HELICOPTER BOAT

UMOM OIL COMPANT OF CALrOWW

ATTACHMENT I I

367

UNION OIL OCS 6 3 7 0

9-30-88 41

o

o

378

o

a

o +

Prop, Loc

Prop, toe

UNION OIL OCS S3 71 9 -30 -88

Prop. Loc.

412

Prop. J i ^ — Prop. Loc

Prop.

0 0

Prop

•p. Loc

Loc

455 456

JC

»»**nc tent

ATTACHMENT XT

UNION OIL AND GAS OIVISION UNION o a COMPANY or C A L I F O R N I A

• OWTMVf tT l O U l l l t " l l l » » I C ?

LOCATION **L*r

GARDEN BANKS BLKS.

411 8 412 PROSPECTS

WATER-BASE LIGNOSULFONATE J 5/STEM COMPETITIVE MUu PRODUCT?

3ARCID

B a r o i d

IMC

Imco Bai'

MAGCOBAR MILCHEM

W e i ^ . i t i n g M a t e r i a l

Magcobar M i l - B a r

DESCRIPTION

B a r i t e (3a r ium S u l f a t e )

Aquagel Zeogel

Imco Gal Imco B r i n e g e l

Imco Beat

Clays (Viscosifiersj

Magcogel Salt Gel

Super Visbestos

Thinners

M i l - G e l S i l t WaLer Gel

Vyoming Ben ton i t e A t t a p u l ^ t e c l a y

f o r s a l t water muda.

Asbestos M a t e r i a l

3- B r o x i n

Carbonox Imco VC-10 Imco L i g

Spersene T a n n a t h i n

J n i c a l L igco

Sodium Chromate Sodium Chromate Sodium Chromate Sodium Chromate

Ferrocnrome L i g n o s u l f o n a t e

Chrome Lignos - ^ f t n a t Processed L- 'gni te So j ium Chromate

(Chrom A d d i t i v e f o CLS Produc ts )

C e l l e x

D e x t r i d

F l u i d Loss C o n t r o l Agents

I B .o-CMC Magco-CMC K i l - n e m CMC Sodium Carboxyme thy l ce l l u l o s «

dt T a n i c Polymer ( P o t a to s t a r c h

t r e a t e d w/ b a c t e r i c i d e )

uj.mc Caust ic Soda

Lime C a u s t i c Soda

Lima C a u s t i c Soda

Lime Caus t ic Soda

Hydrated Lime Sodium Hydroxide

Calc ium Removers

S. \ . P. P.

Bicaroonare o f Soda

Imco t JS (SAPP) S. A. P. P.

Bicarbonate of Soda

Bicarbonate ->f Soda

S. A. P. P.

Bicarbonate of Soda

Sodiua Acid Pyrophr-jpnate

-odium Bicarb nate

Dofoamer

Aluminum Stearate

Murainum S tea ra t e

Aluminum S tea ra t e

Aluminum S tea ra te

Aluminum S tea ra te

Micatex W a l l Nut

Imco Mica Imco P lug

L o s : C i r c u l a t i o n Mater i l s

Magco Mica Nut P l . g

M i l Mica M ; Plug

Mica Flakes (Graded) Cround Walnut H u l l s

(Graded)

MISCELLANEtUS PRODUCTS

Trad". Name Company

,~S L o u i s i a n a Mud Drispac D r i l l i n g S p e c i a l t i e s , I n c . F l o * a l D r i l l i n g S p e c i a l t i e s , I n c .

d e s c r i p t i o n

Chrome L i g n o s u l f o n a t e - T h ; n n e r P o l y a n i o n i c " e l i u l o s e - F l u .d Loss C o n t r o l Asbestos M a t e r i a l - V i s c o s i f i e r

ATTACHMENT XII

AIR QUALITY STATEMENT

The Plan of Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6370 Well A, Garden Banks Block 411 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to tu*e ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel1.

The r i g to be used to d r i l l t h i s well w i l l be Zapata Off-Shore Company's Rig Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i g .

The normal fuel consumption per day for th is r i g is approximately 2,000 gal lons of d iese l . The onshore base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Union Oi l Shore Cise located at Intracoastal C i t y , Louisiana. A l l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from th is base.

A l l a i r emission calculat ions are based on the aforementioned d r i l l i n g and i n s t a l l a t i o n time frame.

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pol lutant Emission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 19 7 7, Table 33 .3 -1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT X I I I

AREA Garded Banks BLCCK 411 PLATFC*M c.B 41 I , OCS-C 6J70

PROJECTED EMISSIONS FROM EACH SOURCE

BY AIR POLLUTANT FOR i 9 8 4 Year

SOURCE MR POLLUTANT (T/YR.")

• 502 NOx CO J TSP VOC

DRILLING RIG PROJECTED EMISSIONS

5,616 84,420 J 8 , 3 6 0 6,030 6,750

TRANSPORTATION, CARGO BOAT, CREW BOAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277 114 213

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144 6,963

MISCELLANEOUS 25% OF SUBTOTAL 1,425 21,240 4,659 1,536 1,740

TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 23,296 7 ,680 8,703

•

Total from F a c i l i t y IN TONS PER YEAR 3.6 53.1 11.6 3.8 4.3

• . I

• I •

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 411 PLATFORM GB 411, OCS-G

6370 "A" i

| , EXEHPT1 ON CALfULATi OS'S ' '

I

E - 3^0 (D 2 /3) for carbon monoxide

E • 33 • 3 0 for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, total suspended particulates, and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D " 207 Statute Miles (l ,092, 960ft.)

E - 118,973 CO

E - 6,893 S02, NOx, TSP, and VOC

• 1984 HIGHEST YEAR

POLLUTANTS " E " (T /YR. )

PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? ' 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES •

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TSP 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.891 4.3 YES

E • Tha emission exemption amount expressed In tons per year.

D » The distence of the f a c i l i t y from the closest onshore area of a state expressed in statute miles.

CF5/cd 06/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR Garden Banks Block A l l OCS-C 6370WeII "A

FUEL RUNNING TAKEOFF t, CONSUMPTION

EMISSION SOURCE TIMl/OAY LANDINCS/DAY GALLONS/DAY

CAICULAT10N TOR 90-DAV DRILLING PHASE:

.1)3 i I line Rig

Cargo Boat (In Berth)

Crew Bo.it (In Berth)

Ik-1 icoptcr Takeoff 5 I..nul i ngs

24 Mrs.

2 Hrs.

2 I f rs .

2.000

EMISSION FACTORS POUND/1,000 GALS.

S0 2 _ NOx C0_ TSP VOC

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

EMISSION FACTORS PROJECTED EMISSION. AIRCRAFT TAKEOFF I LANDINGS "0-OAY PROJECTION IN

SO? NOx CO TSP VOC 5gL NOx CO

5.616 84.420 18 . 360 6.030 6 . 750

11 168

.18 .S7 .S7 .2S .52

11 Itf

64 205 205 90 187

CAUIULATlOa FOR 2-DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PHASE:

Derrick: Barge

Carina Boat ( I ' i Ber th)

Crew Boat ( In Berth)

24 Mrs.

12 Hrs.

12 Sirs.

S.700

24

24

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.5

i'i ujecued emissions are based on. data f r o a "Compi la t ion o f A i r P o l l u t a n t E a l s s i o n Fac to r s , " 3rd Ed i t i on AP-42, EPA. 1977, Table 3 .3 .3-1 and Table 3 .2 .1 -3 .

NOx _S?2_

6.702 84.961

CO TSP

18.637 6.144

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

1/81

AIR QUALITT STATEMENT

The Plan of Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well B, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel 1.

The r i g to be used to d r i l l th is well w i l l be Zapata Off-Shore Company's Rig Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i g .

The normai fuel consumption per day for th i s r i _ is approximately 2,000 gal lons of d iese l . The onshore base for th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Union Oi l Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i ty , Louisiana. Al l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.

Al l a i r emission calculat ions are based on the aforementioned d r i l l i n c and i n s t a l l a t i o n time frame.

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pollutant Emission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XIV

r\?SA Carden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412, OCS-G 6371


BY AIR POLLUTANT FOR 1954 Year

SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT ( T / Y R . j SOURCE 502 NOx CO TSP VOC


5,616 84,-20 18,360 , 0 _>0 6,750


•

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .0,144

* ' + .

6,963

MISCELLANEOUS 25Z OF SUBTOTAL 1,425 21,240 4,659 1,536 1,740

TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 2 3,2 96 7 ,680 8,"03

•

Total from Fac i l i ty . IN TCNS PER YE'-o 3.6 53.1 11.6 3.8 6.3

I •

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412, OCS-G

6371 "B"

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS '

f o r carbon monoxide

f o r s u l f u r d iox ide , n i t rogen oxides , t o t a l suspended p a r t i c u l a t e s , and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D " 207 Statute Miles ( l ,092, 960f t . )

E - 116,975 CO


1984 HIGHEST YEAR

POLLUTANTS " E J I (T /YR. )

FROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? ' 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES •

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TSP 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.891 4.1 YES

E • The emission exemption amount expressed i n tons per year.

0 • The distance of the f a c i l i t y from the c loses t onshore area o f a state expressed in s ta tute m i l e s .

E - 3^0 (D 2/3)

E - 33.3 D

CFB/cd 0 6/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR C. rden Bank* B l o c k 412 OCS-C 6371 w e l l H B M

RUNNING TAKEOFF 4 FUEL

CONSUMPTION EMISSION FACTORS POUND/1,000 GALS.

EMISSION FACTORS AIRCRAFT TAKEOFF 1 LANDINGS

PROJECTED EMISSION. 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

EMISSION SOURCE TIME/OAY LANDINCS/DAY GALLONS/DAY S 0 2 NOx C0_ TSP_ VOC SO? NOx CO TSP VOC SO NOx CO TSP VOC

CAICULATION TOR 90-DAY D R I L L rJG PHASE:

mmine Rig 24 Mrs . ?.000 3 1 . 2 469 102 33.S 37 .S 5.616 84.420 18 . 360 6 .030 6.75<

C i i i go Boat ( I n B c r t l i ) 2 H r s . 4 3 1 . 2 469 102 33.S 37 .S 1 ! 168 36 12 I

Crew Bout ( I n B e r t h ) 2 T l r s . 4 31 .2 469 102 33.S 37.S 11 16". 36 1? 1

IU 1 i c o p t c r T a k e o f f 6 Land ings 4 . 1 8 .57 . 57 .25 .S2 64 205 205 90 i s ;

CAUiULATIOh fOR 2 -DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PHASE:

D e r r i c k Barge 24 H r s . S .700 31 .2 469 102 33.S 37.S

Cargo Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 12 H r s . 24 31 .2 469 102 33.S 3 7 . 5

•

Crew Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 12 H r s . 24 3 1 . 2 469 102 33.S 3 7 . 5

P r o j e c t e d e a i s s i o n s a re based on d a t a f r o a

i

• • C o m p i l a t i o n o f A i r _§?2_ NOx CO TSP VOC

P o l l u t a n t E m i s s i o n F a c t o r s , " 3 r d W i t l o n A P - 4 2 , EPA, 1977 , J . 3 . 3 - 1 and T a b l e 3 . 2 . 1 - 3 .

T a b l e 6 . 7 0 * 84 . 961 18.637 6.144 6.94

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

1/81

\ AIR QUALITY STATEMENT

The Plan of Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of CCS-G 6370 Well C, Garden Banks Block 411 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the we l l .

The r i g to be used to V i l l t h i s well w i l l be Zapata Off-Shore Company's Rig Zapata Lexi.igton or a comparable r i g .

The normal fue l consumption per day for th i s r i g is approximately 2,000 gal lons o f d iesel . The onshore base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Union Oi l Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i ty , Louisiana. A l l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.

Al l a i r emission calculat ions are based on the aforementioned d r i l l i n g and i ns ta l l a t i on time frame.

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pollutant Emission Factcrs" t h i r d edi t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XV

AREA Garden Banks BLCCK 4 i 1 PLATFORM GB 411, QCS-G 6370

PRaTECTED EMISSIONS FROM EACH SOURCE

BY AIR POLLUTANT FOR i 9 84 Year

SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT (T/YR.") SOURCE SOz NOx CO f TSP VOC


5,616 84,420 18,360 6,030 6,750 TRANSPORTATION: CARGO BOAT, CREW BOAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277 114 213

•

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144 6,963


TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 23,296 7,680 8,703

• •

Total from F a c i l i t y IN TONS PER VEAR 3.6 53.1 11.6 3.8 4.3

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 411 PLATFORM GB 411, OCS-G 637

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS ' •

E - 3400 (D 2 /3 ; for carbon monoxide

E • 33*3 0 f o r s u i f u r d i o x i d e , n i t rogen oxides, t o t a l suspended p a r t i c u l a t e s , and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D " 207 Statute Miles ( l ,092, 960f t . )

E - 118,975 CO

E - 6,893 SO2, NOx, TSP, and VOC

1984 HIGHEST YEAR


PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T/YR.) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? ' 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,393 53.1 YES •

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TSP 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.891 4. * YES

E • The emissio exemption amount expressed i n tons per year.

D • The distance of the f a c i l i t y from the closest onshore area of a s tate expressed in s ta tu te mi les .

CFB/cd 06/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR Carden Banks B l o c k 411 OCS-C 6370 Wel l "C "

RUNNING TAMOFF £ EUEL

CONSUMPTION EMISSION FACTORS POUND/ ,000 C S


"ROJECTED EMISSION, 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

m i SSI K SOURCE TIME/DAY LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY S 0 2 NOx C0_ Tbt VOC SQj NOx C0_ TSP VOC S 0 2 NOx CO TSP _yoc

< AU:ULATIO;< ron 9C-DAY DRILLING PHASE:

S 0 2 NOx C0_ Tbt

D i i l l i n c B i g 24 Mrs . 7.000 31 .2 469 102 33.S 3 7 . 5 5.616 84.420 18.360 6 .030 6.75C

C.ir j :o Bout ( I n B e r t h ) 2 H r s . 4 31 .2 469 102 33.5 3 7 . 5 11 168 36 1?

Crew Boat ( I n L c r t h ) 2 M r s . 4 31 .2 469 102 33 .5 3 7 . 5 11 168 36 12 1

Ik-1 i c o p t e r T a k e o f f ' 1 . l l l l l 1 H g s •1 . 18 .57 .57 .25 .52 64 205 205 90 183

CALCULATION TOR 2-DAYj PLATFORM INSTALLATION PHASE:

D e r r i c k Barge 24 H r s . s . /OO 31 .2 469 102 3 3 5 3 7 . 5

C.irô Boat ( I n SPTthJ 12 H r s . .'4 S1.2 469 102 33 .5 37 . S

•

Crew Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 12 H r s . 24 31 .2 4 6 i 10? 3 3 . 5 37.S

1 ' io jccWed c i u I o n s o r e based on d a t a f r o n P o l l u t a n t C a i s s i o n F s c t o r s , " 3 r d E d i t i o n AP 3 . 3 . 3 - 1 and T a M e 3 . 2 . 1 - 3 .

' C o m p i l a t i o n o f A i r - 4 2 , LPA, i 9 7 7 , T a b l e

SO, NOx CO

6 .702 8 4 . 9 b l 18,63?

Tsr 6.144

VOC

6.9<

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

1/81

i

I


The Plan o f Operation f o r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well U, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fol lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the we 11.


The normal fuel consumption per day for this rig is approximately 2,000 gallons of diesel . The onshore base for this activity wil l be the Union Oil Shore Base located at Intracoastal City, Louisiana. All transportation, boats, and helicopters will be handled from this base.

Al l a i r emission calcu lat ions are based on the aforementioned d r i l l i n g and i n s t a l l a t i o n time frame.

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pol lu tant ..mission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XVI

Garden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412, OCS-G 6371 "D"

PROJECTED EMISSIONS FROM EACH SOURCE ...


SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT (T/YR.") SOURCE NOx CO TSP VOC


s,616 84,420 18,360 6,030 6,750 TRANSPORTATION, CARGO BOAT, CREW BOAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277 114 213

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144

•'«».

6,963


TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 23,296 7,680 8,703

•

•

Total from F a c i l i t y IN TONS PER YEAR 3.6 53. 1 11.6 3.8 4.3

AREA Garden Banks B L 0 C K 412 PLATFORM GB 412 -

OCS-G 6 371

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS / .

I E - 3^0 (0^3) for carbon monoxide

E • 33-3 0 for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, total suspended particulates, and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D " 207 Statute Miles (1,092, 960ft.)

E - 118,975 CO


HIGHEST YEAR


PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES •

CO 118,975 11.6 YSS

TS? 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.891 a.3 YES

E » The emission exemption amount expressed ?r. tons per year.

D - The distance of the f a c i l i t y from the closest onshore area of a state expressed in statute miles.

CF5/cd 06/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR Carden Banks Block 412 OCs-C 6371 We 11 "D"

FUEL RUNNING TAKEOFF 4 CONSUMPTION

gtlSSION SOURCE TIME/DAY LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY

CALCULATION FOR 90-DAY DRILLING PHASE:

EMISSION FACTORS POUND/1,000 CALS.

S0 2 NOx C0_ VSP VOC

EMISSION FACTORS PROJECTED EMISSION, A1RLTAFT TAKEOFP I LANDINGS 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

~SrT, NOx CO TSP VOC S C 2 NOx CO

• D i I l l i n g Rig

Cargo Boat ( I n Berth)

24 Mrs.

2 Hrs.

2.000 31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

S.M6 84.420 18.360 6.03C 6.751

11 168 36 12

Crew Boat ( I n Berth)

He I I c o p t c r Takeoff C Landings

2 Hrs. 31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

16 .57 .57 .25 .52

11 168

64

36 12

20 5 20 5 90 18

CAIJCULATIOM FOR 2-DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PHASE:

l t e r r t > t Barge

Cargo Boat ( I n Borth)


24 Hrs.

12 Hrs.

12 Hrs.

5.700

24

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

Project**! emissions are based on data f rom "Compi la t ion o f A i r P o l l u t a n t Emission Factors ," 3rd E d i t i o n AP-42, EPA. 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3 .2 .1-3 .

S07

6.702

NOx CO TSP

84.96i 18.637 6.144 6 .9

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

1/81

1 I AIR QUALITY STATEMENT

The Plan o f Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well E, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel l .

The r ig to be used to d r i l l t h i s well w i l l be Zapata Off-Shore Company's Rig Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i q .

The normal fuel consumption per day fo r th is r i g is approximately 2,000 gallons o f d iese l . The onshore base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Union Oi l Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i t y , Louisiana. A l l t ranspor ta t ion, boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.

A l l a i r emission calculat ions are based o.i the aforementioned d r i l l i n g and i n s t a l l a t i o n timt frame

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pollutant Emission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 arid Tabic ?.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XVII

AREA Garden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412, OCS-G 6371



SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT (T/YR.) • S0 2

NOx CO TSP VOC

DRILLING RIG PROJECTEJ EMISSIONS

5 ,616 84,420

1 18,3b0 6,0 30 6,750

TRANSPORTATION, CAPGO BOAT, CREW ''OAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277 114 213

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144 6,963


T0TAL IN DOUNDS 7,127 106, : o : 2 3,296 7 ,630 S./03

•

Total from F a c i l i t y IN TONS PER YEAR 3.6 53. 1 11.0 3.8 4.3

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412 • OCS-G 6 371

EXEHPTION CALCULATIONS ' •

(

E - 3 ^ 0 ( D 2 / 3 ) f o r carbon monoxide

E • 33-3 0 f o r s u l f u r d iox ide , n i t rogen oxir 'es, t o t a l suspended p a r t i c u l a t e s , and v o l a t i l e . o r g a n i c compounds

D " 20 7 Statute Miles (l ,092, 960f t . )

E - 1x8,975 CO


1984 HIGHEST YEAR

POLLUTArVTS " E " (T /YR. )

PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES -

CO : : 8,9 ;• 5 11.6 YES

TS? 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.893 . . . YES

E • The emission exemption a-rount exp;er.êd i n tons per year.

D • The distance o f the f a c i l i t v from the c loses t onshore area of a state expressed in s ta tute m i l e s .

CFE/cd 06/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION POR Carden Bank* Block j j j j OCS-C 6371 We 1; "E"

FUEL RUNNING TAKEOFF 4 CONSUMPTION

EMISSION SOURCE TIME/DAY LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY

CAICULATION EOR 90-DRY DRILLING PIIASE:

D r i l l i n g Rig

Cargo Boat ( I n Borth)

Crew Boot ( I n Berth)

lit-1 icoptcr Takeoff t, Landings

24 Mrs

2 Mrs

2 Hrs.

2.000

EMISSION FACTORS EMISSION FACTORS PROJECTED EMISSION. POUND/1,000 GALS. AIRCRAFT TAKEOFF j LANDINGS 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

S0 2 NOx C0_ TSP VOC SO? N07 CO TSP VOC SO." NOx CO"

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

31.2 '69 102 33.S 37.S

5.616 84,420 18.360 6.030 6.750

11 168

l l 168

.18 .57 .57 .2S .52 i f 205 705 90 187

CAICULATION FOR 2-DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PHASE:

Derrick Barge

Cargo Boat (In Borth)


24 Hrs.

12 Hrj.

12 Mrs.

5,700

24

24

31.2 469 102 33..5 37.5

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

Projected emissions are based or. data from "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors," 3rd Edition AP-42, EPA, 1977, Table J.3.3-1 and Table \ ? _

! /«•

6.7 2

Da HV.4J6-

r L rsf _

... • > r k'l! •


The Plan of Operation for the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well F, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel1.

The r ig to be used to d r i l l th is well w i l l be Zapatu Off-Shore Company's Rig Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i g .

The normal fue l consumption per day for th is r i g is approximately 2,000 gallons o f d iese l . The onshore base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Unior. 011 Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i ty , Louisiana. Al l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.

Al l a i r emission calculat ions are based on the aforementioned d r i l l i n g and i n s t a l l a t i o n time frame.

The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of Air Pollutant Emission Factors" t h i r d edi t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XVIII

" , 1

AREA Garden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412 OCS-G 6371 "F"

!



SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT ( T / Y R . j

• S0 2

NOx CO TSP VOC


5,616 84,420 18,360 6,030 6,750

TRANSPORTATION, CARGO BOAT, CREW BOAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277

•

114 213

•

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144 6,963

MISCELLANEOUS 25Z OF SUBTOTAL 1,425 21,240 4,659 1,536 1,740

TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 23,296 7 ,680 8,703

•

Total froir. Fac i l i t y ... I N TONS P-:P. YEAR 3. 6 53.1 11.6 3.8 4.3

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 417. PLATFORM GB 412 ' OCS-G 6 371

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS ' . i

(

E - 3^0 (D 2 /3)' for carbon monoxide

E • 33-3 0 for sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, total suspended particulates, and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D " 207 Statute Miles (l ,092, 9*o«*t.)

E - 118,975 CO




PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? 6,893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES -

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TSP 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 4.3 YES

E • The emission exemption amount expressed in tons per year.

1) • The distance of the f a c i l i t y from the closest onshore area of a state expressed in statute miles.

CFB/cd Ob/27/80

PROJECTED AIR D l l SS ION FOR Carden Banks B l " k 412 QCS-C6371 Wel l T

FUEL RUNNING TAKEOFF fl CONSUMPTION

IHISSION SOURCE TIME/DAi LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY

CAICULATION IOR 90 -DAY Di l l LLING PHASE:

EMISSION FACTORS PROJECTED EMISSION. AIRCRAFT TAKEOFF I LANDINGS 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

EMISSION FAI"~ POUND/1,000 PALS.

S 0 2 NOx C0_ TSP VOC SO? NOx CO TSP VOC ~ JJO NOx CO TSP

l i i 1 l l i n g Rig

C.i i | ;c Boat ( I n B c r t l g

Cr»*M Boat ( I n B e r t h )

IU' I i c o p t e r Takeoff ti l a n d i n g s

24 Mrs .

/ H r s .

2 H r s .

2.000 31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31 .2 469 102 33.S 37.S

31.2 469 102 33.S 37.S

5.616 84.420 IR . »60 6.OK) 6,

11 168

11 '68

.18 .57 .57 .25 .52 64

36 12

36 12

705 205 90

CALCULATION FOR 2-DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PJjASE:

5.700 Derrick Barge 24 Hrs

C'.i i eo Boat (In Berth)

Crew Boat (In Berth)

12 Hrs.

12 Hrs.

J4

24

31.2 469 5 37.5

31.2 469 '32 33.5 37.5

31.2 469 102 33.5 37.S

1'iojecUaJ eaissions arc hased on data froa "Compilation of Air P..Mutant Eaission Factors." 3rd Edition AP-42, EPA. 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and loble 3.2.1-3.

so 2 - NOx CO TSP

6 .702 84 .961 18,617 6.144

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

1/81


The Pl a.i o. Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well G, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fol lows:

I t is expected to take ninety (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel1.


The normal fuel consumption per day for th is r i g is approximately 2,000 gallons of d iese l . Tne onshore base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i l l be the Union Oil Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i t y , Louisiana. A l l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.


The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pol lutant Emission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

ATTACHMENT XIX

AREA Garden Banks 6 LOCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412 • nes ' ^71

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS ' • > " :

i

l

E - 34O0 f o r carbon monoxide

E " 33-3 0 f o r s u l f u r d iox ide , n i t rogen oxides, t o t a l suspended p a r t i c u l a t e s , and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D * 207 Statute Miles ( l ,092 , 960f t . )

E - 118,975 CO

£ " 6,893 S02, NOx, TSP, and VOC

1984 HIGHEST YEAR

POLLUTANTS " E " (T/YR.)

PROJECTED EMISSIONS

(T /YR. ) EXEMPT

(YES OR NO)

SO? ' 6,893 3.f YES

NOx 6,8' 3 53.1 YES -

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TS? 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC fi.fi<n 4, 1 YES

E • The emission exemption amount expressed i n tons per year.

D • The distance of the f a c i l i t y from the closest onshore area of a s ta te expressed in s ta tute m i l e s .

CF5/cd 06/27/80

AREA Garden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412

OCS-G 6371 " G "

PROJECTED .SSIONS FROM EACH SOURCE ...

BY AIR POLLUTANT FOR i 9 8 4 Year

i SOURCE 1 AIR POLLUTANT (T/YR.")

1 502- NOx CO TSP VOC


5,616 84,420 18,360 6,030 6,750


•

SUBT0TAI 5,702 84,96?. 18,637 .6,144 6,963


TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 23,296 7 ,680 8,703

*

•

T o t a l f r o m F a c i l i t y IN TONS PER YFA.R 3.6 53. 1 11.6 3.8 4.3

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR Carden Rank, block 412 OCS-C6371 Hell "C.

FUEL EMISSION FACTORS EMISSION FACTORS PROJECTED EMISSION. RUNNING TAKEOFF 6 CONSUMPTION POUND/1,000 GALS. AIRCRAFT TAKEOFP t LANDINGS 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

I MISSION SOURCC TIME/DAY LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY S 0 2 NOx C0_ TSP_ VOC S 0 ? NOx C0_ TSP VOC _ S 0 . NOx CO

CALCULATION IOR 90-DAY DRILLING PHASE:

O i i l l i r g R i g 24 Mrs . 7.000 31 .2 469 102 33.S 37 .S 5.616 84.420 18.360 6 .030 6 .75f |

Cargo Boat

(••• O c r t l i ) 2 Mrs . 4 31.2 469 102 3J .S 37 .S 11 168 36 12

Crew Bont

( I " B e r t h ) 2 M r s . 4 31.2 469 102 33.S 37 .S 1 ! 168 36 12

Mi I i copter

Takeoff (,

Landings 4 .18 .S7 .57 .25 .52 64 205 205

CAIJCULATION FOR 2-DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION PIDISE:

Merr ick Barge 24 Hrs. 5.700 31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

C:u Boot

( I n Berth) 12 Hrs. 24 31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5

Crew Boat

( In Berth) 12 Mrs. 24 31.2 469 102 33.5 37.5 Projected emissions are biced on data fro« "Compilation of A i r Pollutant Eniss 'on Fac tors , " 3rd Edit ion AP-42. EPA, 19/7, Table 3.3.3-1 ond Table 5.2.1*3.

J/81

_ ^ 2 _

6.701

NOx CO TSP VOC

13.637 6.144 6.9< 84.961

(TOTALS i i i POUNDS)

i J

1 ; AIR QUALITY STATEMENT i

The Plan o f Operation fo r the d r i l l i n g of OCS-G 6371 Well H, Garden Banks Block 412 is as fo l lows:

I t is expected to take ninetv (90) days to d r i l l and complete the wel1.

The r i g to be used to d r i l l t h i s well w i l l be Zapata Off-Shor j Company's Rig Zapata Lexington or a comparable r i g .

The normal fuel consumption pe" day fo r th is r i g is approximately 2,000 gal lons of d iese l . The onshor? base fo r th is a c t i v i t y w i i l be \.he Union Oil Shore Base located at Intracoastal C i t y , Louisiana. Al l t ranspor ta t ion , boats, and hel icopters w i l l be handled from this base.


The projected emissions are based on data from "Compilation of A i r Pollutant Emission Factors" t h i r d ed i t ion AP-42, EPA 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3.2.1-3.

AiTACHMENT XX

AR.HA Garden Banks BLCCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412, OCS-G 6371

PROJECTED EMISSIONS FRCM EACH SOURCE


SOURCE AIR POLLUTANT OYYRO SOURCE S02- NOx CO TSP VOC


5,616 84,^20 18,360 6,030 6,750 TRANSPORTATION, CARGO BOAT, CREW BOAT, AND HELICOPTER (DRILLING PHASE) 86 541 277 114 213

SUBTOTAL 5,702 84,961 18,637 .6,144

•' s .

6,963


TOTAL IN POUNDS 7,127 106,201 2 3,296 7 ,680 3.703

• •

T o t a l from F a c i l i t y L IN TONS PER YEAR 3. 6 53. 1 11.6 3.8 4. 3

AREA Garden Banks BLOCK 412 PLATFORM GB 412 -CCS-G 6371 "H"

EXEMPTION CALCULATIONS

E - 3 ^ 0 ( D 2 / 3 ) f o r carbon monoxide

E * 33-3 D f o r s u l f u r d ioxide , n i t rogen oxides, t o t a l suspended p a r t i c u l a t e s , and v o l a t i l e organic compounds

D - 207 Statute Miles (1,092,960ft.)

E - 118,975 CO

E " 6,893 S02, NOx, TSP, and VOC


POLLUTANTS " E " (T /YR.)

PROJECTS EMISSIONS

(T/YR.) EXEMPT

(YES CR NO)

SO? 6.893 3.6 YES

NOx 6,893 53.1 YES •

CO 118,975 11.6 YES

TSP 6,893 3.8 YES

VOC 6.891 YES

E • Th« emission exemption amount expressed i n tons per year.

D • The distance o f the f a c i l i t y from the c loses t onshore area o f a state expressed in s ta tute m i l e s .

CFB/cd 06/27/80

PROJECTED AIR EMISSION FOR Car ., Bank* B l o c k 412 0CS-C6371 W e l l " H "

FUEL RUNNING TAKEOFF f, CONSUMPTION

EMISSION FACTORS POUND/1,900 GALS.


PROJECTED EM"SSION, 90-DAY PROJECTION IN

M I S S I O N SOURCE TIME/DAY LANDINGS/DAY GALLONS/DAY S 0 2 NOx CO TSP VOC SOj NOx C0_ TSP VOC NOx CC TSP VOC — —.. — v CAUULATION TOR 90-DAY DRILLINC PHASE:

Del M l n c R ig 24 H r s . 2 .000 3 1 . 2 469 102 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 5 5.616 84.420 18.3oO 6.030 6 . 750

C«i:go Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 2 H r s . 4 3 1 . 2 4C9 102 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 5 11 168 36 12 1 1

Cri 'M Boat ( I n H e r t h ) 2 U r s . 4 31.2 469 '.02 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 5 11 168 16 \2 1 1

IK-1 i cop t c r Takeoff f, (..Hil l ings 4 . 18 .57 .S7 .75 S2 205 205 *) 187

CALCULATION TOR 2 -DAYS PLATFORM INSTALLATION Pi IASE:

D e r r i c k Barge 24 M r s . S .700 31 .2 469 102 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 5

Car f'O Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 12 M r s . 24 31 .2 469 102 33 .5 37 .5

•

Cicw Boat ( I n B e r t h ) 12 Mrs . 24 3 1 . 2 469 102 3 3 . 5 3 7 . 3

Pio jccUrd ea iss ions are based on data f r o a " C o a p t a t i o n of A i r J?2. 6 ,702

NOx CO TSP voc PuPi i t an i Caission Foc to rs , " 3rd e d i t i o n AP-42, LPA, 1977, Table 3.3.3-1 and Table 3 .2 .1 -3 .

J?2. 6 ,702 84 , 961 18.6 37 6.144 6 . %

(TOTALS IN POUNDS)

I/J3I

J

COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT

CONSISTENCY CERT J FI CATION

PLAN OF EXPLORATION Type of Plan

GARDEN BANKS BLOCKS 411 AND 412 Area and Block

OCS-G LEASES 6370 AND 6371 Lease Number

The proposed a c t i v i t i e s descr ibed in d e t a i l in the Plan comply wi th

Louisiana's approved Coastal Management Program(s) and w i l l be conducted

in a manner cons is ten t w i th such Program(s).

Arrangements have been made w i t h the State-Times in Baton Rouge, Louisiana

to publ ish a pub l i c not ice o f the proposed a c t i v i t i e s no l a t e r 'nan

February l b , 1984.

Union Oi l Company of Ca l i f o rn i a Lessee o** Operator

C e r t i f y i n g O f f i c i a l c

Bate

ATTACHMENT XXI

ENVIRONMENTAL REPORT

EXPLORATION i

GARDEN BANKS BLOCKS 411,412

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA

L a f a y e t t e , l ou i s i ana

November 29, 1983

contact person

Douglas W. Blaskowsky P. 0 . Box 51388, OCS

L a f a y e t t e , Louisiana 70505 (318) 232-9724

prepared by

MERIDIAN RESEARCH CORPORATION Box 3804

Lafaye t t e , Louisiana 70502-3804

ATTACHMENT XXII

(2) DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACT IUN

(a) TRAVEL MODES AND ROUTES

i Un ion O i l Company o f C a l i f o r n i a p lans to cond-tct e x p l o r a t o r y d r i l l i n g

on Garden Banks Blocks 411 and 412. O p e r a l i o n s are evoected t o beg in d u r i n g

the e a r l y p a r t o f 1984. The Union O i l f a c i l i t y a t I n t r a c o a s t a l C i t y w i l l he

used f o r onshore s u p p o r t . Boat t r a f f i c i s expected to t o t a l 7-10 round t r i p s

weekly. H e l i c o p t e r t r a f f i c s h o u l d t o t a l a d a i l y round t r i p by a sma l l h e l i c o p t e r

and one r o u n d t r i p a week by a l a r g e r crew change h e l c o p t e r .

The t r a v e l r ou t e f o r t h e boa t s w i l l be f r o m I n t r a c o a s t a l C i t y t o the

Gulf v i a t h e Freshwater Bayou Canal and then d i r e c t l y t o the B l o c k . H e l i c o p t e r

t r a f f i c i s n o r m a l l y bv the most d i r e c t r o u t e , weather and t r a f f i c c o n d i t i o n s

p e r m i t t i n g .

(b) SUPPORT BASE

The s u p p o r t base w i l l be the Union O i l f a c i l i t y at I n t r a c o a s t a l C i t y ,

L o u i s i a n a . The planned e x p l o r a t i o n a c t i v i t i e s w i l l h e lp t o m a i n t a i n t h i s

base a t o r n e a r i t s p resen t l e v e l o f o p e r a t i o n s . No new joba, o r expans ion

of p h y s i c a l f a c i l i t i e s i s e x p e c t e d t o r e s u l t because o f t h i s e x p l o r a t o r y

d r i l l i n g .

(c) NEW SUPPORT FACILITIES

No new f a c i l i t i e s such as new l a n d bases , r a f i n e r i e s , s to rage f a c i l i t i e s ,

pumping s t a t i o n s , boat d o c k s , h e l i c o p t e r pads , o r f u e l i n g f a c i l i t i e s , are

l i k e l y t o be r e q u i r e d because o f a c t i v i t i e s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h B l o c k s 411 and 412.

The p r e s e n t onahore suppor t f a c i l i t i e s a re c o n s i d e r e d to have adequate c a p a c i t y

to p rocess t h e p o t e n t i a l h y d r o c a r b o n s f r o m these B l o c k s .

(d) NEW OR UNUSUAL TECHNOLOGY

No new t e c h n i q u e s o r u n u s u a l t e c h n o l o g y i s expected t o be r e q u i r e d .

1

i

(e) MAPS OF PROPOSED ACTIVITY

Louisiana is the only a f f e c t e d s ta te , f l i e r s are -*o p ipe l ines or other

f a c i l i t i e s i located on these Blocks.

Cf) TRANSPORTATION OF OIL OR CAS

These. Blocks l i e seaward of a po r t ion of the Gulf having a high

concentrat ion of o i l and gas production f a c i l i t i e s . Should a commercial

discovery r e s u l t , . i s l i k e l y that a p i p e l i n e ( s ) would be constructed to

l ink these Blocks wi th the e x i s t i n g system closer inshore and that processing

of any p o t e n t i a l hydrocarbon would occur i n the present onshore f a c i l i t i e s .

(3) DESCRIPTION OF AFFECTED ENVIRONMENT

(a) PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL

(1) Commercial Fishing

Commercial f i s h i n g i s an important economic a c t i v i t y o f f the Louisiana

coast. Menhaden, shrimp, u n c l a s s i f i e d i n d u s t r i a l b o t t o m f i s h , and reef type

fishes such as snapper and grouper are the major types sought. Almost a l l

of the ca tch l a taken over or along the edges of the shallow cc. " i nen t a l

she l f . Blocks 411 and 412 l i e beyond the c o n t i n e n t a l shelf on Li.e con t inen t a l

slope w i t h water depths i n the 180-250 fathom range (1,080-1,500 f e e t ) .

The only f i s h e r y l n the v i c i n i t y i s that f o r r o y a l red shrimp. This i s a

very small f i s h e r y and the Blocks l i e at the deep outer l i m i t s of t h i s

zone. Consequently l i t t l e or no commercial f i s h i n g i s expected over these

Blocks. No impacts to commercial f i s h i n g i n t e r e s t s are a n t i c i p a t e d .

(2) Shipping

Tne project Blocks l i e beyond the shipping fairways, transit zones,

and anchorage areas found along the northern Gulf coast.

2

( 3) Rc r i ea t lon

The distance from shore (146 miles) and the water depth (1,080-1,500

e4;t) shoul preclude anv rec rea t iona l use of these Blocks.

(4) C u l t u r a l Resources

These Blocks l i e beyond the zone where c u l t u r a l resource evaluat ions

are required.

(5) Eco log ica l l y Sens l t lv" Features

No e c o l o g i c a l l y sens i t ive features have been I d e n t i f i e d e i t h e r on or i n

the immediate v i c i n i t y of the p ro j ec t Blocks.

(6) P ipe l ines and Cables

No p i p e l i n e s or cables have been i d e n t i f i e d on these Blocks.

(7) Other Minerals

There are no known plans at t h i a t i .e f o r the development of minerals

other than hydrocarbons on these Blocks.

(8) Ocean Dumping

Ocean dumping la p roh ib i t ed l n t h i s area.

(9) Endangered or Threatened Species

The coaa ta i waters o f f Louiaiana are u t i l i z e d to some degree by f i v e

endangered speciea of whales, three endangered species of aea t u r t l e s , and

I'JO threatened speciea of sea t u r t l e s . The endangered speciea are the blue

whale, sei whale, sperm whale, f inback whale, humpback whale, A t l a n t i c

r i d l e y t u r t l e , hawkabl l l t u r t l e , and leatherback t u r t l e . Threatened species

Include the loggerhead and green sea t u r t l e s . Of the whale species, the

sperm whale i a perhaps the most common l n the Cul f of Mexico and the blue

whale the leas t conmon, w i t h only two a ight inga of the l a t t e r having been

reported. The other three sp-ciea of whales may be coraaidered uncommon

3

1

in the Culf, although the humpback was once hunted commercially in the

central Gulf during the 19th. Century (Schmidly, 1981). The leatherback

is believed to prefer the deeper oceanic w.i T S while the other species cf

t u r t l e s are .cons idered more coastal iu n u t n a . Consequently, the leatherback

is the onlv t u r t l e l i k e l y to be encountered in the v i c i n i t y of the Blocks.

Most of the recei.c whale sig^t'ngs in the Cn f have been made In the general

v i c i n i t y of the project Blocks, so w.r les ma > be present in the gereral area.

General over exploi ion of both t u r t l e and whales for food and other

producto has been p r i m a r i l y responsible for th tr decline. A few nations

s t i l l harvest whiles and t u r t l e s are caught in n <ny parts of the world. Turtles

are often k i l l e d when trapped i n f i s h i n g gear and are unable to surface for

a i r . T u r t l e nesting grounds are subject to harvesting a c t i v i t i e s f o r both

t u r t l e s and eggs and general disturbance of nesting a c t i v i t i e s . New evidence

indicates that t u r t l e s are being k i l l e d through the ingestion j f p l a s t i c t r a s h ,

that when f l o a t i n g i n the water resembles j e l l y f i s h (a f a v o r i t e t u r t l e food).

D r i v i n g and support vesae.i a c t i v i t y may cause a temporary and l i m i t e d

disturbance or any t u r t l e or whale in the v i c i n i t y . However, no s c i e n t i f i c

evidence has been found that indicates that t h i s type of disturbance has been

responsible f o r population declines of these species. No s i g n i f i c a n t impacts

i r e expected LO endangered or threatened specie; irom the exploratc y d r i l l i n g

planned f o r Blocks 411 and 412.

(b) SOCIO-ECONOMIC

(1) Related New Employment

Not applicable at t h i s time.

4

. I

(4) UNAVOIDABLE ADVERSE IMPACTS

i

Callaway (! 981) completed an extensive review of petroleum related

j j p t r a t i o n s i n the'Texas-Louisiana continental shelf region. Potential

negative impacts addressed by him were discharge of d r i l l c u t t i n g s ,

d r i l l i n g f l u i d s , o i l s p i l l s , and pioduced formation waters.

D r i l l c u t t i n g s are small fragments, of the formation cut by the d r i l l

b i t and discharged i n t o the water on a continuous basis during active

d r i l l i n g . The larger c u t t i n g s t*?ud to move d i r e c t l y towards the bottom

where they w i l l usually accumulate i n p i l e s . The depth of the water over

Blocks 411 and 412 (over 1,000 feet ) i s l i k e l y to preclude any mounds

of c u t t i n g s developing on the seafloor adjacent to the d r i l l s i t e s . When

mounds do develop, im-obile benthic fauna trapped beneath i s smothered.

No such impact i s expected i n he pro j e c t are...

Large-scale discharge of d r i l l i n g mud occurs on an average of 6-10

times during the d r i l l i n g of a p a r t i c u l a r w o l l . Also, as the cu t t i n g s arc

discharged, some mud w i l l be entrained on them and w i l l warh free as the

cuttings d r i f t towards the bottom. The clay p a r t i c l e s i n the d r i l l i n g f l u i d

tend to f l o c c u l a t e on contact w i t h s a l t water, and along w i t h the f i n e r

c u t t i n g s , form a t u r b i d plume down-cuirent from the r i g . When a large-scale

discharge of mud occurs, t h i s plume may reach down-, rre.it to a distance

of as . ch as 3,200 feet before i t i s completely d i l u t e d . The t o x i c i t y of

these p a r t i c l e s and the d r i l l i n g cud components Is very s l i g h t and there

is l i t t l e Impact on water q u a l i t y , rhe primary e f f e c t l a a reduction of

l i g h t p enetration which may reduce primary production by phytoplankton.

Since the wells planned are for e x p l o r a t i o n , there should be no

discharge of produced formation waters other than possibly during the

5

. ! •

testing of ench w e l l . These s . . l ty waters have been shown to have l i t t l e

effect on water j< i ! icy uiher than w i t h i n a few yArds of the point of

discharge. »

O i l s p i l l s are always a p o s s i b i l i t y , however, good industry safe ty ha

practices combined wi th a s t r i c t adherence to .applicable rules md regulat ions

has great ly reduced the chaaces of a d.imaging s p i l l . In f a c t , d r i l l i n g

.and production a c t i v i t i e s are now considered to be a minor source of the

to ta l hydrocarbons found in the Gulf waters. More o i l i c added to the Gult from

the f low of the Mis s i s s ipp i River than from OCS o i l a id gas opera t ions .

The most s ign i f i can t , impact from t h i s proposed d r i l l i n g operat ion i s the

temporary removal of a small area of seabottom from that p o t e n t i a l l y ava i lab le

to royal red shrimp f ishermen. Due to the small extent of t h i s f i s h e r y , and

the loca t ion of the p ro jec t Blocks in a marginal par t of the f i s h e r y , no

detectable impacts are expected. In summary, th<j unavo. .able impacts are

considered t o be r . inor. l o c a l i z e d , and temporary No majoi or permanent

damage to the marine environment or to man's use of i t i s a n t i c i p a t e d .

6

(5) REFERENCES

B r i g h . , T. J. . and R. Rezak " F i s h l n e Banks o f t b o Texas C o n t i n e n t a l She ! : " , i n : Bul L i s , H. K . , . r . , .»nd A. C. Intes, t . i s . Pro» e»' H m j s : C M l o q u i m on Snappe r - u i .pot r i s h o r y F i s i m r c c s o f f ? e We s i ern Cent ra 1

, At 1 ar.f i i 1'» r a n . Texas A & M U n i v e r s i t y »Sea Crant C o l l e g e ! M i s s i s s i p p i - / x a b a m a Sea Grant C o n s o r t i u m , and F l o r i d a Sea Gr..nt Col Wee Program. Co l l ege S t a t i o n , Texas; B i l o x i , M i s s i s s i p p i ; and G a i n e s v i l l e , F l o r i d a .

Chr i s tmas , J . Y . , and D. J . E t z o l d M77 ' I h e Menhaden F i s h e r y ot the ( i u l f o i M e x i c o , U n i t e d S t a t e s :

A Regional Management Plan'*. G u l f ( o a s t Research L a b . , Ocean S p r i n g s , M i s s .

Conant, R. 19 75 A F i e l d Guide t o R e p t i l e s ar.d Amphibians o f Eas tern and C e n t r a l

N o r t h America . Houghton M i f f l i n Company, Bos ton .

F r i t t s , T . H . , & R. P. Reynolds 1981 " P i l o t Study o f the Mar ine Mammals. B i r d s , & T u r t l e ? i n OCS Areas

o f the G u l f o f M e x i c o " , US F i sh & W i l d l i f e S e r . , O f f i c e o f 3 i o l o g i -c a l S e r v i c e s . W a s h i n g t o n , DC. FWS/OBS-d1/36.. 139oo.

Gal laway, Benny ' . 1981 An Ecosystem A n a l y s i s o f O A and Gas Development on The Texas -

L o u i s i a n a C o n t i n e n t a l S h e l f . U. S. F i s a and W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e , O f f i c e o f B i o l o g i c a l S e r v i c e s . W a s h i n g t o n , D. C. FWS/OBS-81/27. 89pp.

Lowery, G. H . , J r . 19 74 The Mammals o f L o u i s i a n a .md i t s A d j a c e n t Wate r s . L o u i s i a n a

S t a t e U n i v e r s i t y P r e s s , Baton Rouge, h S l p p .

Mumphrey, A. J . , .Tr . , and G. D. C a r l u c c i , J r . 1978 " E n v i r o n m e n t a l P l a n n i n g f ^ r O f f s h o r e O i l and Gas". Volume

V: Regional S t a t u s R e p o r t s . P a r t 3: G o l f Coast R e g i o n . The C o n s e r v a t i o n F o u n d a t i o n , Wash ing ton , D. C , U. S. F i s h and W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e , B i o l o g i c a l S e r v i c e s Program, FWS/OBS-7 7 / 6 1 . 3 , 158pp.

Schmidlv, Dav id J . 1981 '"Marine Mammals o f t h e Southeas te rn U n i t e d S ta t e s Coast and

the G u l f of M e x i c o " . U . S. F i s h and W i l d l i f e S e r v i c e , O f f i c e o f B i o l o g i c a l S e r v i c e s , W a s h i r g t o n , D . C , FWS/OBS-80/41. 163pp.

Sea Grant Col l ege 1980 D r a f t Env i ronmen ta l Impact Statement and F i s h e r y Management

P l an and R e g u l a t o r y A n a l y s i s and Proposed R e g u l a t i o n s , Reef F i s h Resources o f t he G u l f of M e x i c o . G a i n e s v i l l e , F l o r i d a .

South A t l a n t i c F i s h e r y Management C o u n c i l 19 79 F i s h e r y Management P lan t - r t'>p A t l a n t i c B i l l f i s h e s : Whi t e

M a r l i n , Blue M a r l i n , S a l l f i s h , and S p e a r f i s h . M i a m i , F l o r i d a .

Southeast F isher ies Center 1978 Fishery Management Plan f o r Groundfjsh (Gulf of Mexico).

Pre l i s . D r a f t , Nat. Marine Fisher ies Service , Miami, F l o r i d a .

U. S Department of Commerce 1980 F i n a l Environmental Impact Statement f o r The Louisiana Coastal

Resources Program. O f f i c of Coastal Zone Mgt . , Washington, DC.

U. S. Department of Commei._e 1980 Fishery S t a t i s t i c s of The United States , 1976. NOAA, S t a t i s t i c a l

Digest No. 70, Washington, DC.

U. S. Department of Commerce 1980 Marine Recreational Fishery S t a t i s t i c s Survey, A t l a n t i c and

Cul*: Coasts, 1979. NOAA, Current Fishery S t a t i s t i c s , No. 8063, Washington, DC.

U. S. Department of the I n t e r i o r 1982 Di a f t Regional Environmental Impact Statement, Gulf o f Mexico.

Minera ls Management Service, M e t a i r i e , Louis iana .

van Lopik, J . R . , K. H. Drummond, and R.E. Condrey 19/9 D r a f t Environmental Impact Statement and Fishery Management

. I a n f o r the Shrimp Fishery of the Gulf of Mexico, United States Waters. Center f o r Wetlands Resources, Louisiana State U n i v e r s i t y , Bator. Rouge, Louis iana .

Ward, C H . , M.E. Bender, and D . J . Reish, Eds. 1979 The Oi-shore Ecology I n v e s t i g a t i o n , E f f e c t s of O i l D r i l l i n g

and Production l n A Coastal Environment. Rice U n i v e r s i t y Studlea , Vol . 65, No. 4 and 5 . , Houston, Texas.

(6) STATEMENT

The proposed a c t i v i t y w i l l be c a r r i e d u t and comple ted w i t h the

guarantee o f the f o l l o w i n g i t e m s :

(a) The bes t and s a f e s t t e c h n i q u e s w i l l be u t i l i z e d thgoughout f h e p r o

j e c t . T h i s i n c l u d e s mee t ing a l l a p p l i c a b l e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r equipment

types , g e n e r a l p r o j e c t l a y o u t , s a f e t y systems and equipment and m o n i t o r

ing sys t ems .

(b) A l l o p e r a t i o n s w i l l be cove-ed by a M i n e - l i s Management S e r v i c e

approved o i l s p i l l c o n t i n g e n c y p . a n .

(c) A l l a p p l i c a b l e F e d e r a l , s t a t e , and l o c a l r e q u i r e m e n t s r e g a r d i n g a i r

emiss ion and wate r q u a l i t y and d i s c h a r g e f o r the proposed a c t i v i t i e s , as

w e l l as any o t h e r p e r m i t c o n d i t i o n , w i l l be c o m p l i e d w i t h .

Documents

FEB 21'flM