36
Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility Timothy Handy

Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

  • Upload
    brock

  • View
    25

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility. Timothy Handy. Euler Equations. H yperbolic system of conservation laws Requires an additional closure relation. de Laval Nozzle – A Basic Example. Assumptions: Ideal Gas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at

the National Ignition FacilityTimothy Handy

Page 2: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Hyperbolic system of conservation laws Requires an additional closure relation

Conserved Quantity

Multidimensional Time Dependent

One-dimensional, Steady, Arbitrary Cross-

section Area

Mass

Momentum

Energy

Euler Equations

Page 3: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Assumptions:◦ Ideal Gas◦ Isentropic (Reversible &

Adiabatic)◦ One-dimensional flow◦ Compressible

Examples:◦ Rocket Engines◦ Astrophysical Jets

de Laval Nozzle – A Basic Example

Page 4: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Layers of material◦ Density gradient◦ Generated due to gravity

Steady State vs. Static Equilibrium◦ Steady State – balanced state with change

(dynamic processes)◦ Static Equilibrium – balanced state without

change Atmospheres are generally steady with

dynamics◦ Pressure changes move flow◦ Heating and cooling processes trigger convection

Stratified Mediums (Atmospheres)

Page 5: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Euler with SourcesGravity Gravity

+ Heating

Page 6: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

What’s stopping us from falling?

This pressure term comes from the interaction between atoms (well, fermions…)◦ Two atoms can’t share the same space

What happens if the pressure disappears?◦ Our businessman is in trouble!

What counters gravity?

Page 7: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Core-Collapse SupernovaeIron core grows

Mass is added from silicon burning

Gravity > Degeneracy

PressureElectrons and Protons combine

to form Neutrons and Neutrinos

Sudden loss of pressure at the core

Okay BigBigge

rTOO BIG!

+ -+ = +

Page 8: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Falling fluid parcels doesn’t know new equilibrium◦ Possible overshoot of equilibrium◦ Motion becomes supersonic at some point -> sonic point

inside the flow◦ Compressed, high density plasma changes its properties

(phase transition) and becomes nuclear matter◦ NM is much harder to compress and starts effectively

acting as a solid boundary◦ This boundary acts as a reflector for the incoming flow◦ Reflected flow perturbations propagate upstream and

evolve into a shock String of springs

Bounce

Page 9: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Bounce Animation

Page 10: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and

settles down near the surface of the reflector (proto-neutron star)

State of Affairs at this Time

Page 11: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Ohnishi et al. (XXX) proposed an experimental design to study the shock

Drive material toward a central reflector using lasers

The material would then strike the reflector and produce a shock

Material would continueto move through the shock

Ohnishi Design

Page 12: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Loss of gravity and heating/cooling◦ Can a laboratory

shock be similar to a real shock?

Ohnishi Design

Page 13: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Characterization of the flow via Euler number [Ryutov et al. (XXX)]

HEDP diagram

Scaling Law (Euler number) and HEDP

Page 14: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and settles down near the

surface of the reflector (proto-neutron star)

The above are essential nozzle componentsHighlight difference with SN

SettlingCooling by NeutrinosGravity

ConvectionHeating by Neutrinos

The problem can now be reformulated as the composite of two problemsShock Stability ProblemSettling Flow Problem

Here our focus is on the first problem and initially without Heating

State of Affairs at this Time

Page 15: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and settles down near the surface of

the reflector (proto-neutron star)

The above are essential nozzle components Supernova’s additional processes

◦ Settling Cooling by Neutrinos Gravity

◦ Convection Heating by Neutrinos

The problem can now be reformulated as the composite of two problems◦ Shock Stability Problem◦ Settling Flow Problem

Our focus is on the shock stability problem (initially without heating)

State of Affairs at this Time

Page 16: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Analytic

Page 17: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Critical Mach number (Ppre>0)

Page 18: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Maximum Aspect Ratio

Page 19: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Euler Number vs. Mpre

Page 20: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Initial BC constraints

Page 21: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Semi-Analytic

Page 22: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Latin Hypercube Sampling

Page 23: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Semi-analytic Setup

Page 24: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Semi-analytic Results

Page 25: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Semi-analytic Results

Page 26: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

One-D

Page 27: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Setup

Page 28: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Coupling of Shock to Pert

Page 29: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Stable Advective Times

Page 30: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Two-D

Page 31: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Setup

Page 32: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Qualitative Results

Page 33: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Flux Decomposition

Page 34: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Conclusions – Parameter Ranges

Page 35: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Conclusions – SASI Recreation

Page 36: Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility

Future Work