Upload
brock
View
25
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at the National Ignition Facility. Timothy Handy. Euler Equations. H yperbolic system of conservation laws Requires an additional closure relation. de Laval Nozzle – A Basic Example. Assumptions: Ideal Gas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Feasibility of Core-Collapse Supernova Experiments at
the National Ignition FacilityTimothy Handy
Hyperbolic system of conservation laws Requires an additional closure relation
Conserved Quantity
Multidimensional Time Dependent
One-dimensional, Steady, Arbitrary Cross-
section Area
Mass
Momentum
Energy
Euler Equations
Assumptions:◦ Ideal Gas◦ Isentropic (Reversible &
Adiabatic)◦ One-dimensional flow◦ Compressible
Examples:◦ Rocket Engines◦ Astrophysical Jets
de Laval Nozzle – A Basic Example
Layers of material◦ Density gradient◦ Generated due to gravity
Steady State vs. Static Equilibrium◦ Steady State – balanced state with change
(dynamic processes)◦ Static Equilibrium – balanced state without
change Atmospheres are generally steady with
dynamics◦ Pressure changes move flow◦ Heating and cooling processes trigger convection
Stratified Mediums (Atmospheres)
Euler with SourcesGravity Gravity
+ Heating
What’s stopping us from falling?
This pressure term comes from the interaction between atoms (well, fermions…)◦ Two atoms can’t share the same space
What happens if the pressure disappears?◦ Our businessman is in trouble!
What counters gravity?
Core-Collapse SupernovaeIron core grows
Mass is added from silicon burning
Gravity > Degeneracy
PressureElectrons and Protons combine
to form Neutrons and Neutrinos
Sudden loss of pressure at the core
Okay BigBigge
rTOO BIG!
+ -+ = +
Falling fluid parcels doesn’t know new equilibrium◦ Possible overshoot of equilibrium◦ Motion becomes supersonic at some point -> sonic point
inside the flow◦ Compressed, high density plasma changes its properties
(phase transition) and becomes nuclear matter◦ NM is much harder to compress and starts effectively
acting as a solid boundary◦ This boundary acts as a reflector for the incoming flow◦ Reflected flow perturbations propagate upstream and
evolve into a shock String of springs
Bounce
Bounce Animation
The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and
settles down near the surface of the reflector (proto-neutron star)
State of Affairs at this Time
Ohnishi et al. (XXX) proposed an experimental design to study the shock
Drive material toward a central reflector using lasers
The material would then strike the reflector and produce a shock
Material would continueto move through the shock
Ohnishi Design
Loss of gravity and heating/cooling◦ Can a laboratory
shock be similar to a real shock?
Ohnishi Design
Characterization of the flow via Euler number [Ryutov et al. (XXX)]
HEDP diagram
Scaling Law (Euler number) and HEDP
The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and settles down near the
surface of the reflector (proto-neutron star)
The above are essential nozzle componentsHighlight difference with SN
SettlingCooling by NeutrinosGravity
ConvectionHeating by Neutrinos
The problem can now be reformulated as the composite of two problemsShock Stability ProblemSettling Flow Problem
Here our focus is on the first problem and initially without Heating
State of Affairs at this Time
The outer stellar envelope is infalling Material passes through the shock Advected downstream subsonically and settles down near the surface of
the reflector (proto-neutron star)
The above are essential nozzle components Supernova’s additional processes
◦ Settling Cooling by Neutrinos Gravity
◦ Convection Heating by Neutrinos
The problem can now be reformulated as the composite of two problems◦ Shock Stability Problem◦ Settling Flow Problem
Our focus is on the shock stability problem (initially without heating)
State of Affairs at this Time
Analytic
Critical Mach number (Ppre>0)
Maximum Aspect Ratio
Euler Number vs. Mpre
Initial BC constraints
Semi-Analytic
Latin Hypercube Sampling
Semi-analytic Setup
Semi-analytic Results
Semi-analytic Results
One-D
Setup
Coupling of Shock to Pert
Stable Advective Times
Two-D
Setup
Qualitative Results
Flux Decomposition
Conclusions – Parameter Ranges
Conclusions – SASI Recreation
Future Work