11
Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns

F14 H 571by

Molly Elliott

Page 2: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Green and Witte

• Can Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns Contribute to the Decline of HIV Prevalence?

Journal of Health Communication, 2006

Page 3: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

• 1953: Janis and Feshbach publish the first study of fear appeal

• Fear arousing messages backfire

• Controversial

History of Fear-

Based Messages

• 1980’s - 2000’s: Meta-analyses of fear appeal

Page 4: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

• EPPM (Witte, 1992, 1998; Witte, Meyer, & Martell, 2001): Reconciles differences in historical literature

History of Fear-Based Messages

Page 5: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott
Page 6: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott
Page 7: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

“Early scare campaigns seem to havelittle impact on peoples’ actions.”

…”we know for example, that public responses to fear messages is [sic] not optimal.

It results in short-term behavior change but no behavior change over the long run”.

Page 8: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott
Page 9: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Uganda’s success

story

Page 10: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Why object?

• Sex-positive Western views object to fear based messaging

Page 11: Fear Arousal in Public Health Campaigns F14 H 571 by Molly Elliott

Conclusions

• ’86 - ’91: Strongest fear appeal

• Mid ’90’s - on: Softer approach

• Call for bringing fear appeal back