3

Fdi in Defence Issues and Recent Developments

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Fdi in Defence Issues

Citation preview

  • 1 www.visionias.in Vision IAS

    VISION IAS www.visionias.in

    FDI IN DEFENCE ISSUES AND RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

    Copyright by Vision IAS

    All rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or

    transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,

    without prior permission of Vision IAS

  • 2 www.visionias.in Vision IAS

    FDI in Defence Issues and recent developments

    Contents

    i. Introduction ii. Budget 2014 announcement

    iii. Need of FDI in Defence iv. Criticism of FDI in Defence v. Challenges

    vi. Way Forward

    Introduction

    India lives in a hostile neighborhood. It has fought wars with two of its neighbors and relations with these two neighbors are still not friendly. In such a scenario, modern and adequately equipped armed

    forces are an imperative requirement.

    Indian armed forces, i.e. the Army, Air Force and Navy, require up gradation of their obsolete machinery and needs modern technology. Any armed force is as good as its weapons. So to achieve this objective,

    India needs to make massive expenditure towards weapons purchases.

    Till now we have been fulfilling most of our defence needs through imports and through purchases from Defence PSEs. But from 2001, governments policy has changed and Indian private sector is also now

    involved in manufacture of defence equipments.

    Budget 2014 announcement

    FDI in defence has been raised to 49% through Government route. FDI limit of 49% is composite of all kinds of foreign investments, i.e. FDI, Foreign Institutional investors (FIIs), NRIs, Qualified Foreign

    Investors (QFIs) and Foreign Venture Capital Investors (FVCI)

    FDI above 49% is allowed through Cabinet Committee on Security on case by case basis, wherever it is likely to result in access to modern and State-of-the-art technology

    Need of FDI in Defence

    The failure of Defence PSEs to deliver orders on time and keep up with demand has meant that role of private sector in fulfilling defence needs has increased. For example, the time taken to build Delhi class

    warship took 114 months while equivalent ships take 29-30 months in the U.S. and Japan. Delhi, the first

    in its class, may have involved a learning curve, but sadly, the follow on Mysore and Mumbai also took

    117 and 106 months. The Shivalik class which were contracted for 60 months took 112 months. The

    Main Battle Tank Arjun has been finally in 2014 inducted into army after a delay of four decades since

    the project was first commissioned. The LCA Tejas is still waiting for its final operational clearance. Indian

    armed forces modernization cannot wait for such long delays.

    Though we are manufacturing high-end products like the SU 30 MKI fighters, Brahmos missiles and Scorpene subs in collaboration with other countries, but these are licence productions of foreign

    designed weapons, and even here we know that key assemblies will be imported till the very end of the

    programme.

    India is one of the biggest importers of defence equipments. Nearly 70% of defence procurement is done through imports. This has a serious bearing on our Current Account Deficit. The next phase of military

    modernization can be based on imports.

    This

    docu

    men

    t is p

    erso

    nalis

    ed fo

    r Nee

    lesh

    Lal(n

    eeles

    hlal00

    7@gm

    ail.co

    m)

  • 3 www.visionias.in Vision IAS

    Due to our heavy dependence on imports for our defence needs, our foreign policy sometimes also gets sub-ordinated to our defence needs. So to have an independent foreign policy, we must end our

    dependence on other countries for defence equipment.

    To strengthen manufacturing base for Defence equipments in India, it is necessary to acquire cutting edge technology. This requires foreign defence companies to set-up shop in India.

    A surge of Defence production in India will lead to job creation and employment.

    Criticism of FDI in Defence

    Already a number of private groups like L&T, Tata and Mahindra & Mahindra have set up defence manufacturing units. It has adversely affected the financial health of Defence PSEs. If more FDI is allowed

    then PSEs will become unviable and may also lead to loss of jobs.

    Private defence manufacturers have the urge to make abnormal profits during war periods. In case of war, these companies can hold the nation to ransom. Shifting defence manufacturing to private hands

    may hamper national security.

    More than 10 foreign and domestic companies have been blacklisted for corruption charges. Privatization of defence manufacturing may increase such unethical practices.

    Challenges

    The expectation that by allowing foreign companies to set up shop in India, our imports will vanish is not entirely correct. Our heavy dependence on imports for aircrafts, tanks, submarines, missiles etc will

    persist. It will not be possible to ensure all of them set up shop in India along with the system integrator.

    In 2001, the Government took the first step towards opening up FDI to 26% in defence. However, since then only a meager $4.8 million FDI has come in. Experts feel that until FDI is increased beyond 51%,

    defence sector will not see major inflow of FDI. Foreign firms need to be in control since it is their

    technology, developed often at considerable cost, and therefore the need to protect their intellectual

    property.

    Some Industry analysts feel that FDI limit should be increased to 100%. Even with 100% limit, foreign companies will like to partner with Indian players due to their knowledge of local environment and

    condition. But increasing FDI limit to 100% is fraught with risk. No country allows 100% FDI in defence

    production because countries which are friends today may not be friends tomorrow and decisions on

    defence sale and technology transfer are taken by governments and not by companies.

    Lack of infrastructure like 24x7 available electricity, efficient transportation, etc which have discouraged growth of manufacturing in India will also be roadblock for defence manufacturing.

    Way Forward

    India needs a domestic defence manufacturing base to cater to its defence needs which are only going to increase in the future. We cannot continue to depend on imports to fulfill our needs. They adversely

    affect our import-export balance and also hamper the independence of our foreign policy.

    The recent government decision is in the right step. We must improve our infrastructure facilities to incentivize foreign multi-nationals to set shop in India.

    Along with increasing FDI in defence, we also need to get our ordnance factories, defence PSEs, DRDO laboratories and the private sector to act in concert to meet our defence needs.

    India needs its armed forces to be ever-ready with modern equipments and weapons so that we can thwart any aggression towards our territory and safeguard our sovereignty. As the saying goes, If you

    want peace, be prepared for war.

    Copyright by Vision IAS

    All rights are reserved. No part of this document may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or

    transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise,

    without prior permission of Vision IAS

    This

    docu

    men

    t is p

    erso

    nalis

    ed fo

    r Nee

    lesh

    Lal(n

    eeles

    hlal00

    7@gm

    ail.co

    m)