Upload
shoshana-gallagher
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
FCT Experiences Brian E. Placzankis Weapons & Materials Research Directorate U.S. Army Research Laboratory. Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) Annual Business Meeting Tuesday, 29 April 2014 Army Navy Country Club 1700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
U.S. Army Research, Development and Engineering Command
FCT Experiences
Brian E. Placzankis
Weapons & Materials Research Directorate
U.S. Army Research Laboratory
Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) Annual Business Meeting Tuesday, 29 April 2014Army Navy Country Club 1700 Army Navy Drive, Arlington, VA 22202
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
FCT Armor Objective
To rapidly validate and transition superior or promising foreign proven or produced
aluminum alloys to enable increased supply and flexibility of design for Program
Manager Offices using existing or new armor plate Military Specifications.
M2 Bradley/AMPV JLTV
2008 Alloy
• AA5059
2014 Alloys
• AA7017
• AA2139
• AA2060*
• AA6055*
* CTO Defense Acquisition Challenge
(DAC) Program Domestic Alloys
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
Acquisition Strategy: The IPT
• ARL Weapons and Materials Research Directorate ARL Specifications & Standards Office
• Aluminum Plate Manufacturers Aleris Constellium
• Aberdeen Test Center
• BAE Systems and General Dynamics
• PEO Ground Combat Systems PM-ABCT
• TARDEC
• The Army Service Representative Randy Everett (RDECOM)
• OSD Representatives Bob Thompson Corrosion Policy & Oversight Office
• Other Participating Services USMC
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
Test Strategy - Divide & Conquer
Weapons and Materials Research Directorate• Materials & Manufacturing Science Division
– Coatings, Corrosion, & Engineered Polymers Branch Corrosion Evaluations
– Lightweight & Specialty Metals Branch Fatigue Corrosion Fatigue Stress Corrosion Cracking
– Materials Response & Design Branch ARL Specifications & Standards
• Protection Division– Armor Mechanisms Branch
Ballistics
Aberdeen Test Center Ballistic Shock Weld Qualifications
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
Armor Plate Transition Strategy
• Dependent Upon PMO Mission Needs New Acquisition
Repairs to Current Systems
• Build Awareness of Availability & Improved Capabilities Military Specifications & Standards
IPT Meetings
Technical Reports
Technical Papers at Symposiums
Internal DoD Meetings
Updated System and Component Drawings
AA7017-T6 After Salt Fog Corrosion Exposure
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
FCT Program Impact to U.S. Army
• AA5059-H136 rapidly transitioned to over 2000 RG-33 MRAPs for PM-MRAP (MIL-DTL-46027K Armor Spec)
• AA5059-H131 & H136 supplies alleviated armor plate shortages during Iraq War and helped stabilize costs
• AA5059-H131 used for M2 repairs
• AA5059 considered in new designs
AA5059
Armor Plate
FIELDED
$2.5M R&D Cost Avoidance and
procurement of AA5059 Beyond $14M
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
FCT Lessons Learned
• Maintain PM/PEO level involvement
• Clearly define the Key Performance Parameters so that validation pathways remain simplified.
• Formalize technology transition and facilitate acquisition– Is there a relevant Military Specification? (MILSPEC)– Will engineering drawing numbers, FMs, or TMs need to be updated?– Changes in requirements can mean a course correction
• Publish Closeout Report to submit to RDECOM and OSD– Include final program financials and all acquisition to date– Continue to track and update acquisitions after project closes
UNCLASSIFIED: Approved for public release; distribution unlimited.
Final Thoughts…
• Communication is KEY
– ALWAYS Communicate with your Service Representative• Quarterly reports on time (get to know BIDS)
• Be sure to update your representative on all significant developments positive and negative.
• Also, maintain good communication with your financial contact.
• Steady feedback to your service reps will aid in justifying requests for additional funding should they become needed.
• Follow your chain of command (Don’t worry - Good news will definitely filter up)
– Maintain Steady Dialogues with your IPT Members• Mind your MIPRs and Contracts! (folks generally work better when funded)
• 2 way feedback with PEOs & PMOs will keep you up to date with all tasks and allow for quick reaction to unforeseen setbacks, requirements changes, or better yet OPPORTUNITIES!
• Be ready to extend service end dates for MIPR or Contract funds if milestones slip - It happens (don’t forget to tell your reps)