44
klinični center ljubljana University Medical Centre Ljubljana SPS Nevrološka klinika KO Inštitut za klinično nevrofiziologijo Slovenian-Italian Workshop on Quantitative Needle and High Resolution Surface EMG University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Division of Neurology Roberto Merletti, Ph.D. Lab. for Engineering of the Neuromuscular System, Politecnico di Torino, Italy [email protected] www.lisin.polito.it Basic concepts and applications of multichannel surface EMG

Fatigue Plot

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

muscle

Citation preview

  • klinini center ljubljanaUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana

    SPS Nevroloka klinikaKO Intitut za klinino nevrofiziologijo

    Slovenian-Italian Workshop onQuantitative Needle and

    High Resolution Surface EMGUniversity Medical Centre Ljubljana, Division of Neurology

    Roberto Merletti, Ph.D. Lab. for Engineering of the Neuromuscular System, Politecnico di Torino, Italy

    [email protected]

    Basic concepts and applications of multichannel surface EMG

  • Prof. Lojze Vodovnik has been one of my many mentors and has strongly influenced my career, my approach to research and my way of thinking about problems.

    He has also been a very good friend.I am in debt with him for his teachings.

    This lecture is dedicated to his memory.

    LISiN, Torino

  • 1. Surface EMG is not a diagnostic technique and is not intended toreplace needle EMG.

    2. Surface EMG is a monitoring technique suitable to study movementand neuromuscular control and to assess muscle changes due toaging, pathology, therapy, training, immobilization, lack of gravity, occupational disorders, etc.

    3. Standards are lacking: there have been successful EU efforts toreach consensus and disseminate recommendations (SENIAM, [email protected]), and develop applications (PROCID, [email protected]; NEW, [email protected]; OASIS, [email protected];CYBERMANS, [email protected])

    4. There is a need for teaching and training in the medical schools.

    WHAT SURFACE EMG IS AND IS NOT

    LISiN, Torino

  • With respect to the needle technique, the surface technique:

    1. Is non invasive, non painful and without risks2. Is global (provides global information)3. Is simple and inexpensive4. Is applicable by non medical personnel5. Can be used over long times during work and sport

    activities6. Allows the measurement of quantities not measurable

    with needles7. Does not allow the measurement of quantities

    measurable with needles8. Is complementary (not a replacement) to the needle

    techniqueLISiN, Torino

  • At this time (a.d. 2006) the limitations of surface EMG are:

    1. Signals are dominated by the contributions of superficial motor units

    2. The thickness of skin and subcutaneous fat causesstrong blurring

    3. Crosstalk from nearby muscles may be a serious problem

    4. Artifacts due to muscle movements (in dynamic contractions) may be very strong

    LISiN, Torino

  • Main applications of needle EMG

    1. Diagnostics based on observations of single (or very few) motor unit action potentials and of their morphology and sound.

    2. Fibrillation potentials in denervated fibers

    3. Identification of MU territory (macro EMG)

    4. All the above can be done or observed in eithersuperficial or deep muscles.

    LISiN, Torino

  • Main applications of surface EMG1. Biomechanics and movement analysis:

    Identification of muscle activation intervals and levels, muscle coordination

    2. Muscle fatigue and non invasive fiber typing:Monitoring myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue, electrical and mechanical responses of single motor units

    3. Muscle physiopathology:Monitoring muscle fiber conduction velocity, motor unit recruitment order

    4. Occupational medicine:Monitoring the Cinderellas, postural problems, muscle hyperactivity

    5. Rehabilitation, space and sport medicine:Assessment of effectiveness of treatments and training, monitoringmicrogravity related changes and effectiveness of countermeasures

    6. Pelvic floor analysis:Detection of sphincter asymmetry, prevention of episiotomy related lesions.

    7. Biofeedback:Tension headache, muscle retraining, coordination retraining

  • Why EMG processing ?To document differences between individuals and conditions (young-elderly, before-after treatment or training, etc) by reporting EMG descriptors, that is physical variables associated to the EMG signal. To observe central and peripheral phenomena (such as myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue, activation patterns, control strategies, etc), to assess effectiveness of treatments.

    What descriptors ?2 electrodes: Amplitude (ARV, RMS), frequency (MNF, MDF), amplitude envelope,

    activation times during isometric or dynamic contractions.4 electrodes: as above plus conduction velocity (CV), correlation coefficient (CC)

    between the signals used for CV estimation.5-16 or more electrodes in a linear array: descriptors of individual motor units

    such as location of innervation zone, fiber length, highly accurate CV estimates, firing rate, recruitment pattern, etc.

    What conditions ?Isometric conditions: these are special bench-tests to estimate values that are much more difficult to estimate in dynamic conditions (rates of change of descriptors, single Motor Unit features, etc). Dynamic conditions: activation intervals (muscle on-off timing) during movements, envelope detection, etc. These conditions are of greater physiological interest but are affected by artifacts and may not produce reliable results.

  • Axon

    motoneuron

    Schwann cells andRanvier nodes

    0

    - 70

    Action potential(90-100 mVpp)

    V m(m

    V)

    1 ms o 4 mmMuscle fibers

    4 m/s = 4 mm/ms 4 m/s = 4 mm/ms

    60 m

    /s

    The Motor Unit (MU)(electrical activity)

    Inputs fromother neurons

    One muscle: 10-1000 MU One MU: 50-1000 fibers of the same type (I o II)

    Space or time

  • Subcutaneous tissue

    V(x) x

    CV

    Innervation zone

    Muscle-tendon junctions

    Skin

    Depolarized Zone

    - 70 mV

    xCV CV

    Action potentials travelling towards the tendons

    0 mV

    Potential distribution on the skin

    V(t)

    t

  • Subcutaneous tissue

    V(x) x

    CV

    Innervation zone

    Tendontermination

    Skin

    Depolarized zone

    - 70 mV

    Single differential amplifiers

    xCV CV

    Monopolar voltages in

    space

    Propagating single fiber

    action potentials

    0 mV

    + - + - + - + - + -+ - + - + -Electrode array

    V1 V2 V3 V4 V5 V6 V7 V8

    X

    V1

    V2

    V5

    V4

    V3Diff

    eren

    tial

    volta

    ges

    motoneuron

    3 fiber motor unit

    Il passaggio delle zone depolarizzate sotto una schiera di elettrodi genera una sequenza di segnali scalati nel tempo di un intervallo pari alla distanza tra punti di prelievo divisa per la velocit di propagazione (3-5 m/s).

  • bad

    TimeDifferential amplifiers

    Array of equally spaced electrodes

    bad

    bad

    good

    good

    small noisysignals

    small noisysignals

    small noisysignals

    goodsignals

    goodsignals

    Two electrodes placed symmetrically over the I.Z. give unreliablTwo electrodes placed symmetrically over the I.Z. give unreliable information. e information.

    Propagating MUAP

  • EMG signals detected with a linear array of 16 electrodes in SD mode. Innervation and termination zones of single MUs are evident.

    10 mm

    Biceps brachii muscle contracting at 70% MVC

    Depolarized zones

    50 ms

    1 mV

    1

    15

    7

    Electrode array

  • 1 mV

    1

    15

    7

    Information may be extracted either from the interferential signal (global level) or from the single MUAP (MU level).

    Global analysis and single MU analysis

  • Electrode arrays and amplifiers

  • Signals from rightand left trapeziusduring typing(project NEW)

  • Upper trap. activityduring typingwith forearms

    on the desk.

    50 ms 0.4 mV 50 ms 0.4 mv

    Right Upper Trap

    Left upper trap

    Upper trap. activityduring typingwith forearms

    off the desk.

  • 16 Electrodes

    Pressure sensor

    Anal probe

    Anal probes(1 array and 3 arrays with16 electrodeseach)

    Urethralprobe

    Stick-on array forpuborectalis muscle(8 electrodes)

  • Anal Probe, MVC, depth 5cm, Electrodes 1,16 dorsal, Example of ventral innervation (under electrode pairs 6-8)

    DR

    VL

    16 1

    Probe viewfrom outside

    1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960

    chan

    nels

    time (ms)

    152 V

    16

    16

    1

    8

  • 0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000time (ms)

    15

    8

    1

    15

    8

    1

    1150 1200 7350 7400

    2800 2850 2900 2950 3000 3050 3100 3150 3200

    V = ventralL = leftD = dorsalR = right D

    LRV

    8

    15 1 markProbe viewfromoutside100V

    S01_02, OD, maleProbe location: near orificeContraction level: MVC

    time (ms)

    Anal recording, max. voluntary contraction (observe asymmetry)LE

    FTR

    IGH

    TLE

    FTR

    IGH

    T

  • a) N = 34

    15

    13

    11

    9

    7

    5

    3

    1[ch]

    10 20 30 40 50 60 70[ms] 0F1TWXA02.SIG

    10 20 30 40 50 60 70[ms] 080 80

    15

    13

    11

    9

    7

    5

    3

    1

    [ch]F1TQCA04.SIG

    b) N = 40

  • 200 V

    200 V

    25 ms25 ms

    14 m

    m

    10 mm

    AnalOrifice

    1

    4

    16

    12

    8

    1

    4

    16

    12

    8

    D1TJPA2.sig 9.6875 - 9.7500 s Max. vol. contraction

    D1TWXA2.sig 1.7500 - 1.8125 s Max. vol. contraction

    View from outside

    depth 4-5 cm1

    23

    4

    5

    67

    8910

    11

    12

    13

    1614

    15

    D

    L R

    V

    Fig. 1

    Ch 1

    Ch 2

    Ch 3

    Ch 4Ch. 11

    Ch. 12

    Ch. 13

    Ch. 14

    a) b)

    c)d)

    4 cm

  • 400 V

    25 ms

    A1

    B

    A2

    C2D1C1 D2

    1

    4

    8

    16

    12

    Anal Orifice

    Innervation zone

    Terminal zone

    D1TISA10.sig6.7500 - 6.8125 s Max vol. contraction

    1 23

    45

    6

    891011

    12

    13

    16

    1415

    D

    L R

    V

    BD

    A

    C

    7

    Fig. 3

    a b14

    mm

    10 mm

    Depth: 2-3 cm

    2 cm

  • AnalOrifice

    200 V

    25 ms

    D

    B2B1

    A

    C

    1

    4

    8

    16

    12

    Innervation zone

    Terminal zone

    D1TJPA16.sig

    2.1250 - 2.1875 s Max vol. contraction

    12

    345

    678910

    111213

    1614

    15D

    L RV

    B

    A

    C

    D

    14 m

    m

    10 mmFig. 4

    depth 2-3 cm

    a b

    2 cm

  • 14 m

    m

    a = 1 cm

    Array depth (cm)

    AnalOrifice

    4-5 0-12-3

    1

    4

    8

    16

    12

    1 23

    45

    67

    891011

    1213

    16

    1415

    D

    L R

    V

    (4-5) (2-3) (0-1)

    400 V

    400 V

    400 V

    25 msD1TQCA4.sig 0.3125 - 0.3750 s

    D1TQCA6.sig1.7500 - 1.8125 s

    D1TQCA8.sig 9.1875 - 9.2500 s

    aa a aa

    Contractionlevel : MVC

    Fig. 8

    ab c

  • 14 m

    m

    10 mmAnal Orifice

    Innervation zone

    Terminal zone

    1 23

    45

    67

    891011

    1213

    16

    1415

    D

    L R

    V

    B,DA

    C

    depth 4-5 cm

    Fig. 5

    a

    400 V

    25 ms

    AD

    C

    1

    4

    8

    16

    12

    B

    D1TQCA4.sig 9.3750 - 9.4375 s Max vol. contraction

    b

    4 cm

  • OASIS: possible sphincter damage due to episiotomy

    V

    Surgical incision

    ALow risk

    V

    AMedium

    risk

    P V

    A

    High risk

    P

    P

    InnervationV = vaginal openingP = perineal wallA = anal opening

    V

    A Very high risk

    P

  • Myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue

  • 0 100 200 300 4000.0

    0.5

    1.0

    a )

    1

    23

    4

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    pow

    er

    Frequency (Hz)

    0 0.25 0.50

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1 b)

    t (s) 0 0.25 0.50

    c)Signal b, spectrum n. 4Signal b, spectrum n. 1

    t (s)Beginning of the contraction End of the contraction

    Spectral evolution of a quasi stationary EMG signal.

    Segment bspectrum 1

    Segment cspectrum 4

    Sustained isometricvoluntary contraction

    mV

  • EMG power spectrum

    The power of the EMG signal is distributed in the frequency range 10-400 Hz

    0 100 200 300 400 Hz

    Pow

    er Harmonics

    Power of the harmonics versus their respective frequency.

    The spectrum of the EMG signal changes as a function of time during an isometric constant force sustained contraction , because muscle fiber conbduction velocity and motor unit action potential shape change in time. These parameters recover quickly and there change may be small during intermittent contractions.

  • 0 0.25 0.50

    -0.1

    0.0

    0.1

    time (s) 0 0.25 0.50time (s)

    mV

    Nor

    m. p

    ower

    den

    sity

    0 100 200 300 400

    0.0

    0.5

    1.0

    frequency (Hz)

    Power spectral density during a sustained contraction.

    Signal at the beginning of an isometric sustained contraction

    Signal at the end of an isometric sustained contraction

    Myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue

    During a sustained isometric contraction the surface EMG signal becomes slower, the power spectral density is compressed toward lower frequencies and spectral variables (MNF, MDF) decrease. The decrease of these variables reflects a decrease of muscle fiber conduction velocity and changes of other variables (such as active motor unit pool, degree of synchronization, etc).

  • Mean and median spectral Mean and median spectral frequencliesfrequenclies of the of the EMG signal (MNF and MDF)EMG signal (MNF and MDF)

    MDF: splits the spectrum into two parts of equal power

    MNF: center of gravity line

    0 200 400 Hz

    (f)dPP(f)df ff00m

    =

    ==02

    1f

    f

    0P(f)dfP(f)dfP(f)df

    med

    med

  • 0 100 200 3000

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    frequency (Hz)

    90s

    60s

    30s

    0s

    Centroid lines (Mean frequency)

    Contr

    actio

    n dura

    tion

    Normalized EMG power spectrum

    Mean frequency (MNF) pattern.

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    pow

    er

    One epoch

    Example of power spectrum of the EMG of the biceps brachii during a sustained isometric contraction at 60% MVC. The centroid value (MNF) progressively moves towards the lower frequency values demonstrating myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue. The rate of change can be taken as an index of fatigue.

    Myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue

  • The Fatigue PlotThe Fatigue Plot

    contraction duration

    norm

    aliz

    ed v

    alue

    s (w

    ith re

    spec

    t to

    initi

    al v

    alue

    )

    0

    100

    Root mean square value (RMS)Average rectified value (ARV)

    Force or torque

    Conduction velocity (CV)Mean spectral frequency (MNF)Median spectral frequency (MDF)

    The fatigue plot depicts the time course of some EMG signal variThe fatigue plot depicts the time course of some EMG signal variables ables normalized with respect to their individual initial values. normalized with respect to their individual initial values. It allows comparison of the patterns and rates of change of thesIt allows comparison of the patterns and rates of change of these e variables which reflect muscle properties.variables which reflect muscle properties.

  • 0 20 40 60 80

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    110

    a )+ - 5%

    MDF

    Torque

    70% MVC

    IMDF = 78 Hz% o

    f ini

    tial v

    alue

    time (s)

    0 20 40 60 80 100 120

    b )+ - 5%

    MDF

    Torque

    50% MVC

    IMDF = 77 Hz

    time (s)

    Myoelectric and mechanical manifestations of muscle fatigue during voluntary sustained isometric contractions

    During strong contractions the pattern of MDF or MNF may beexponential. Initial slope or time constant can be used as indexes of myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue. These manifestations begin at the beginning of the contraction and precede and predict mechanical fatigue.

  • The Fatigue Plot is the graph of the time course of the EMG variables, normalized with respect to their initial value, during a sustained voluntary or electrically evoked contraction. It describes percent variations of different variables with respect to their initial value. The graphs below show differences observable between two healthy subjects during isometric 70% MVC contractions of the biceps brachii sustained for 30 s.

    0 5 10 15 20 25 3040

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    valu

    esw

    .r.t.

    initi

    alva

    lues

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    valu

    esw

    .r.t.

    initi

    alva

    lues

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    valu

    esw

    .r.t.

    initi

    alva

    lues

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    valu

    esw

    .r.t.

    initi

    alva

    lues

    ARVmean +/-SDCVmean +/-SDMNFmean +/-SD

    0 5 10 15 20 25 3080

    90

    100

    110

    120

    TRQ(70%)MVC +/-SD

    0 5 10 15 20 25 3040

    60

    80

    100

    120

    140

    160

    180ARVmean +/-SDCVmean +/-SDMNFmean +/-SD

    0 5 10 15 20 25 3080

    90

    100

    110

    120

    Time (sec)

    Time (sec)Time (sec)

    Time (sec)

    TRQ(70%)MVC +/- SD

    Subject 1Mean std. dev. of 9 repetitions.Small myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue.

    Subject 8Mean std. dev. of 9 repetitions.Large myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue.

    Rainoldi A., Galardi G., Maderna L., Comi G., Lo Conte L., Merletti R., Repeatability of surface EMG variables during voluntary isometric contractions of the biceps brachii, J. Electrom Kinesiol., 9, 105-119, 1999.

    The Fatigue Plot during voluntary contractions

  • Nor

    mal

    ized

    valu

    es

    CV

    0 5 10 15 20 25 300.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6Young subject (60% MVC)

    Time (s)

    ARV

    TRQ

    CV

    MNF

    0 5 10 15 20 25 30

    Elderly subject (60% MVC)

    Time (s)N

    orm

    aliz

    edva

    lues

    MNF

    TRQ

    ARV

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1.0

    1.2

    1.4

    1.6

    The Fatigue Plot during voluntary contractions

    The number of type II (larger) muscle fibers decreases with age. This is reflected by reduced MVC and myoelectric manifestationsof muscle ftigue.

  • 0 10 20 30-6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6a

    Time (ms)

    30

    1

    D10C1

    Am

    plitu

    de (m

    V)

    0 10 20 30-8

    -6

    -4

    -2

    0

    2

    4

    6b

    Time (ms)

    30

    1

    D3B1

    M-wave changes during electrical stimulation of the tibialis anterior muscle of two individuals for 30 s at 30 pps

    Subject a: limited myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue

    Subject a: marked myoelectric manifestations of muscle fatigue

  • 0 10 20 30

    MDFMNF

    CV

    RMS

    ARV2 t5a3

    50

    100

    150

    200

    0 10 20 30

    CV. MNF. MDF

    RMS

    ARV

    1 t703n1

    0 10 20 30

    CV

    MNF. MDF

    RMS

    ARV

    4 t401n1

    Time (s)0 10 20 30

    RMS

    ARV

    MDFMNF

    CV

    3 t4a3

    Time (s)

    50

    100

    150

    200

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    val

    ues

    (%)

    Nor

    mal

    ized

    val

    ues

    (%)

    Fatigue plots obtained during electrical stimulation of the tibialis anterior of 4 individuals for 30 s at 30 pps

    (individual differences are evident)

  • Hopf, R.L.Herbort, M. Gnass, H. Gnther, K. Lowitzsch, Fast and slow contraction times associated with fast and slow spike conduction of skeletal muscle fibers in normal subject and in spastic

    hemiparesis, Z. Neurol, vol. 206,pp. 193-202,1974.

    30 40 50 60 70 803,0

    3,5

    4,0

    4,5

    5,0

    5,5

    r = -0,544p < 0,005y = 5,69 - 0,0296xC

    ondu

    ctio

    n ve

    loci

    ty (m

    /s)

    Contraction time (ms)

    4.65 m/s

    3.47 m/s

    Single twitches electrically evoked from the biceps brachii

    muscle.

  • 20 40 60 80 100

    4.0

    4.2

    4.4

    4.6

    4.8

    5.0

    5.2

    5.4

    y = 0.013 x + 3.9r = 0.84 ( p < 0.001 )

    Sprinters Distance Runners

    Con

    duct

    ion

    velo

    city

    (m/s

    ec)

    Relative area of FT fibers (%)

    Sadoyama T., T. Masuda, H. Miyata, and S. Katsuta , Fiber conduction velocity and fiber composition in human vastus lateralis, Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 57, 767-771, 1988.

    CVI(x=0) = 3.9 m/sCVII(x=100) = 5.2 m/s

    Komi P.V. and Tesch P., EMG frequency spectrum, muscle structure, and fatigue during dynamic contractions in man. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol, 1979, 42(1):41-50.

  • 0 5 10 15 200.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    0.9

    1.0

    1.1

    SO = Slow Oxidative fibers (I)FOG = Fast Oxidative Glycolitic fibers (IIa)FG = Fast Glycolytic fibers (IIb)

    Fiber Type percentage by area %SO (I) %FOG (IIa) %FG (IIb)

    SOL 87.2 4.3 12.8 4.4 0.0 0.0DIA 28.2 2.5 33.9 3.0 38.0 2.3EDL 1.5 0.4 31.9 2.5 66.62.6

    Mean st. dev., N = 8 rats

    SOL: SoleusDIA : DiaphragmEDL: Ext. digitorum longus

    SOL

    DIA

    EDL

    Noe

    mal

    ized

    MD

    F

    Time (s)

    Kupa, S.H. Roy, S.C. Kandarian, C.J. De Luca, Effects of muscle fiber type and size on EMG median frequency and conduction velocity, J Appl Physiol, vol. 79(1), pp.23-32, 1995.

  • Hvala Lepa !

    [email protected]

    www.lisin.polito.it