Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 1
Fast Neutron Imaging DetectorsFast Neutron Imaging DetectorsNew DevelopmentsNew Developments
V. Dangendorf / PTB Braunschweig
D. Vartsky / NRC Soreq
A. Breskin / Weizmann Institute, Rehovot
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 2
Task: Detectors for Fast NeutronTask: Detectors for Fast NeutronResonance RadiographyResonance Radiography
position sensitive-detectors
FANGAS OTIFANTI
samples
Be-targetneutron beam
deuteron
beam
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 3
2 4 6 8 1 00
1
2
3
4
C
cro
ss
se
cti
on
/ b
arn
s
N e u t r o n E n e r g y / M e V
2 4 6 8 1 00
1
2
N - 1 4
cro
ss
se
cti
on
/ b
arn
s
N e u t r o n E n e r g y / M e V
2 4 6 8 1 00
1
2
3
4O - 1 6
cro
ss
se
cti
on
/ b
arn
s
N e u t r o n E n e r g y / M e V
Measurement of neutron energy is a prerequisite for Resonance Imaging
Resonance ImagingResonance Imagingexploiting neutron cross-section structures
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 4
Detector Requirements forDetector Requirements forFast Neutron Resonance RadiographyFast Neutron Resonance Radiography
• Large area: > 30x30 cm2
• Detection efficiency: > 5 %
• Insensitivity to gamma-rays
• High counting rate capability: ?
• Neutron spectroscopy in 2-12 MeV range
• Energy resolution: ~ 500 keV at 8 MeV
• Position resolution: 0,5 mm
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 5
Imaging Techniques with Imaging Techniques withTime-Of-FlightTime-Of-Flight CapabilityCapability
Task: Task: Simultaneous acquisition of position params (X,Y) and TOF
1. Neutron Counting Imaging Techniques:
• Each Neutron is individually registered
• relevant parameters (X,Y, TOF) are measured and stored in- 3-dimensional Histogramm- List Mode file
PRO:
• Full correlation of all Parameters is available offline
• Multidimensional Imaging feasible
CON:
• Slow (max several MHz speed)
• For LM storage: excessive diskspace required
• detector development necessary
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 6
Imaging Techniques with Imaging Techniques withTime-Of-Flight CapabilityTime-Of-Flight Capability
2. Integrating Imaging Techniques:
• Image is captured in segmented (“pixelized”) detectors⇒ quantum structure is lost, integrated “currents” into image cells are
measured
• Requires capture and storage structures of sufficient size and dimension(e.g. X,Y, TOF requires multiple frame CCD camera system
Task: Task: Simultaneous acquisition of position params (X,Y) and TOF
PRO:
• Very high data rate
• Based on industrially available techniques
CON:
• necessity for proper parameter selection at runtime
• fast high frequency exposure system needs some development
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 7
Status
01/03
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 8
FANGASFANGAS Principle of OperationPrinciple of Operation
• Neutrons interact in thin foilconverter (1mm PE)
• recoil protons escape from foil
• ionisation electrons are amplified inParallel Plate Avalanche Chamber(PPAC)
• wire chamber (MWPC) for finalamplification and localisation
• TOF and position are stored inListmode or 3-d matrix
FAst NeutronGAS-filled
imaging chamber
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 9
OTIFANTIOTIFANTIPrinciple of OperationPrinciple of Operation
• Neutrons interact in scintillatorBC400 (NE102)
• recoil protons are stopped andproduce local light spot
• optics (mirror and lens) transferimage to photon counting imageintensifier or fast framing camera(Hadland ULTRA 8)
OpTIcal FAst NeuTron Imaging system
PM
lens
Mirror
BC400(22*22 cm2
d = 10 mm )
image intensifieror fast framing
camera (ULTRA 8)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 10
OTIFANTI with ULTRA8OTIFANTI with ULTRA8Fast Framing TechniqueFast Framing Technique
• Intensified CCD camera
• segmented photocathode with 8 indepen-dently gatable frames (a 512*512 px)
• Short gating time (down to 10 ns per shot)
• Repetitive exposure (2MHz) triggered withbeam pulse for predefined TOF window
⇓⇓
8 images, each for a differentneutron energy
∆E
1
∆E
2
∆E
3
∆E
4
∆E
5
2 4 6 8 10
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
energy / MeV
YΩ,
E /
Q /[
1012
/(sr
C)]
∆E
6
∆E1 ∆E2
∆E3 ∆E4
∆E1
∆E5 ∆E6 ∆E6
∆E4
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 11
Summary :Summary :
FANGAS: . - Detector worked well but has low detection efficiency: εFA ~ 0,2 % - Data Acquististion slow : ~ 104 s-1 at present
required : > 105 s-1
OTIFANTI:
a) with framing camera: - small optical efficiency due to problem with image splitter - limited pulsing possibility (present frame exposure rate: ~ 2500 s-1, required: 2*106 s-1 )
b) with present standard intensified camera: - due to integrating system →→ high acquisition speed
- only single frame possible, i.e. 1 energy range per exposure cycle- optical efficiency needs improvement (at present < 60 % QE per absorbed 5 MeV neutron
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 12
New DetectorDevelopment
FANGAS
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 13
larger efficiency by usingdetector cascade⇒ 25 Dets provide 5 %
Requirements:- simple and industrial production- robust and easy to operate- cheap high rate readout system
(> 100 kHz / module)
1 2 3 . . . . . .25
neutrons
Enhancing EfficiencyEnhancing Efficiency
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 14
GEM-FANGASGEM-FANGAS
• neutrons scatter with protons in PE/PP-radiator
• protons produce electrons in conversion gap
• electrons are amplified in multistage GEM structures
• final electron avalanche is collected on resistive layer
• moving electrons induce signal on pickup electrode
• integrated delayline structures encode position information
GEMsPP-radiator
(neutron-converter)
resistive layeron insulator
R/O pads,delay lines)
neutron
proton
conversion gap
~ 12 mm
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 15
DETECTOR SETUPDETECTOR SETUP
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 16
1. Efficiency 1. Efficiency OptimsationOptimsation
Simulation Tool: GEANT 3
Efficiency vs. foil thickness of a polypropylene converter foil:
“Efficiency” is identified as charged particle escape (mainly protons)
Conclusion:
• Appropriate Foil thickness for neutrons of 2 MeV < En < 10 MeV is 1 mm
• Efficiency is 0,05 % - 0, 3 % per detector unit
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
Effi
cien
cy /
%
Foil Thickness / mm
En = 2 MeV
En = 7,5 MeV
En = 14 MeV
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 17
2. Detector Optimisation2. Detector OptimisationSimulation of Point Spread Function (PSF)Simulation of Point Spread Function (PSF)
Conclusion:
• fwhm is of the order of 0,5 - 1 mm
• Appropriate readout circuitry should have corresponding resolution
1 mm PPconverter
protonsPixel plane
50x50 micron pixels
neutrons
0.5
-1.5 -1.0 -0.5 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.50.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Rel
ativ
e N
umbe
r of
Pro
tons
Distance from point of interaction / mm
En = 2 MeV
En = 7,5 MeV
En = 14 MeV
Simulation Tool: GEANT3
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 18
Neutron Scatter and ContrastNeutron Scatter and ContrastThe Simulation Configuration
Polypropylene sheets (1 mm thick)
. . .
1Detector
2 3Det. 25
Samples
NeutronSource
0 300 623 624.8 644.7644.6624 cm
Carbon
Fe
Poly-propylene
Al
Simulation Tool: MCNP4
(by I. Mor)
En = 7.8 MeV
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 19
Neutron Scatter and ContrastNeutron Scatter and ContrastTransmitted vs. Scattered RadiationTransmitted vs. Scattered Radiation
• Number of scattered neutrons increases initially with detector number until it reaches maximum at around detector 13
• The T/S ratio drops sharply until detector 13
• After det. 13 the ratio is fairly stable
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 20
Detector OptimisationDetector Optimisation 3. 3. Position ReadoutPosition Readout
Requirements:• few electronic channels per detector element• dead time < 500 ns• 100 kHz rate capability per element
Solution:•delayline readout (5 channels / element)• resistive anode technique to obtain
– sufficient charge spread of signal onR/O pads
– galvanic decoupling between detectorand readout
– limiting discharge energy ( to protectpreamps)
GEM
charge cloudin
induction gap
resistive anode
insulator
R/O board
2 mm
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 21
Resistive Anode TransparencyResistive Anode Transparency
Remarks:
• C-lacquer is simple, cheapest and best suited for large surfaces but requires R-tuning to achieve better transparency
• Stability of Ge-layer 5 weeks:
1st 5 weeks: R increases by 10 - 20 %
1 year (meas.: Apr. 2004): R increased by factor 2
R Transp. X/SUM Y/Sum
(Mohm) (%) (%) (%)Ge-160nm/G10(1) 30 94 59,2 40,8 1,45 1,14Ge-30nm on G10 370 95 58,7 41,3 1,42 1,14
C-lacquer(1) 3,1 71 59,6 40,4 1,48 1,14C-lacquer(2) 3 65 59,2 40,8 1,45 1,14
Ge-160nm/G10(2) 30 101 59,6 40,4 1,48 1,14
Electrode X/Y X/Y(fast)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 22
Readout Electrode and Readout Electrode and DelaylineDelayline
• Position Encoding via Delay Line Readout
• Signal induction to pads (“diamonds”) ofpickupelectrode
• Pads are interconnected in lines (backside) and rows (frontside)
• non-overlapping pads on front and backside to minimize capacitive cross talk
• π-delayline with SMD-parts integrated toelectrode
C2C1
L
Z = 100 Ω, τd = 2,7 nstotal length: 135 ns
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 23
Optimisation of Pad StructureOptimisation of Pad Structurehorizontal charge distributionhorizontal charge distribution
Measurement method:
• irradiating of double GEM detector with 5, 9 keV X-ray beam from 55Fe source
• width of X-ray beam in conversion gap: 0,47 mm
• 160 nm Ge-anode on glass → 63 MΩ•
PA 1
PA 2
PA 3
Ch 2
Ch 1
TDS3052
ExtTrig
R/O electrode
R/O electrodeGe on glassdouble GEM
d
55Fe5,9keV
Ar / CO2p=1 bar
• recording ratio of charge on central strip to total vs source position
• Variation of d to match lateral width of induced charge with pitch of strips(2 mm)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 24
Optimisation of Pad StructureOptimisation of Pad Structurehorizontal charge distributionhorizontal charge distribution
16 18 20 220
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
rela
tive
char
ge /
%
position / mm
Experiment 4 (d=1.0 mm)
Gauss Fit X
c=18.9 mm
σ=0.86 mm
14 16 18 20 22 24 260
10
20
30
40
50
60
rela
tive
char
ge /
%
position / mm
Experiment 2 (d=2.6 mm)
Gauss Fit X
c=20.1 mm / σ=2,19 mm
fwhm:5,1 mm
fwhm:2,0 mm
Result:
2 mm pitch of readout pads selected
⇒⇒Optimum gap between anode and
RO pads is d = 1 mm
previous “knowledge” from wire chamberexperiments: w ~ d is not valid !
d = 2,6 mm
d = 1,0 mm
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 25
Optimisation of Pad StructureOptimisation of Pad Structurevertical charge distributionvertical charge distribution
Measurement method:• irradiating double-GEM detector
with 5, 9 keV X-ray beam from 55Fe source
• recording ratio of charge from front- to back side of R/O pads
• Variation of pad size (area covered by front and back side structure)
•
PA 1
PA 2
Ch 1
TDS3052
Ch2
R/O electrode
from backside
front side back side
Goal:• equal charge on front and back side of R/O pad
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 26
Optimisation of Pad StructureOptimisation of Pad Structurevertical charge distributionvertical charge distribution
Result:
strongly asymmetric size of
readout pads required
Optimized values for 0,5 mm boards and
2 mm pitch:
front side pads: 0,5 mm
back side pads: 1,5 mm
0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.00
1
2
3
4
5
char
ge r
atio
ratio of areas (Af / A
b )
Qfront
/Qback
linear fit (without 2 last points)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 27
Interface and DAQInterface and DAQ
DAQ:DAQ:
CAMDA
• WIN based ⇒ unreliable,• ca 35 kevt/s
ATMD/LEA
• Linux based
• Frontend: ATMD F. Kaufmann, PTB
• Backend: SATAN M. Krämer, GSI
• Rate capability: ca 90 kevt / s
TDC:TDC: ATMD-board from ACAM ATMD-board from ACAM• F1/ATMD PC-hosted 8 channel TDC
with 125 ps resolution, 7us full range
• Q-T converter LeCroy MTQ100
• FIFO-buffered output ⇒ dt < 1 µs • data-throughput about 1 MWord/s
(about 100 kEvts/s)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 28
FANGASFANGAS
ExperimentalExperimentalResultsResults
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 29
Energy SpectrumEnergy Spectrum
2 4 6 8 10 120
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
YΩ
, E /
Q /[
1012
/(sr
C M
eV)
Neutron Energy / MeV
Compare:Neutron yield in forward direction for13 MeV deuterons on thick Be target[Brede et al]
Measured energy spectrum with FANGASwith and without 8 cm C absorber(not efficiency corrected)
2 4 6 8 10
20
40
60
1
2
3
σσ N /
bndN/d
E
EN / MeV
no object 8 cm carbon carbon n x-section
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 30
Position Resolution and ContrastPosition Resolution and Contrast
7 mm 10 mm 20 mm
40 mm
60 mmn beam
1 2 3 5 10 mm
Measurements with step wedge
made of polyvinyltoluene leaves (NE102)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 31
Position Resolution and ContrastPosition Resolution and Contrast
open field imagefor flat fieldcorrection
Raw image
Corrected image
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 32
Position Resolution and ContrastPosition Resolution and Contrast
20 40 60 80 100200
400
600
800
1000
dN/d
x
x / mm
60mm 40mm 20mm 10mm 7mm
ToDo:
• MTF plot
• Abltg fwhm
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 33
Resonance ImagingResonance Imaging
Measurements with carbon cylinders and steel wrench
∅ 30 L20 ∅ 30 L60
∅ 30 L40
∅ 20 L20 ∅ 20 L60 ∅ 20 L40
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 34
Resonance ImagingResonance Imaging
neutron energy : broad spectrum (2 - 10 MeV)acquisition time: 5.5 h1200 c/pixel (matrix 300 x 300 pixel)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 35
Resonance ImagingResonance Imaging
Processed (median filter) ratio
ON
OFF
RATIO
1700 1750 1800 1850 1900 1950 2000
4000
6000
8000
dN/N
TOF / ns
Full Behind 60 mm C
OFF ON
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 36
New DetectorDevelopment
OTIFANTI
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 37
OTIFANTIOTIFANTI
lens
mirror
separate ICCDcameras
Scintillatingfiber screen
Improvements• Thicker scintillating screen (20 mm)• Better lens (F# = 1.0)• Larger diameter intensifier (40 mm)
⇒⇒Factor 17 increase in overall detection
efficiency
Multiple-Energy Imaging• Large diameter ungated
optical preamp with fastphosphor (E36)
• Multiple II CCD cameras,each gated on a differentenergy window
ιd < 2 ns
t →
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 38
OTIFANTIOTIFANTI
Presently available:• 1 camera which can be individually
triggered with 2 MHz repetition rate
PM
lens
BC 400scintillator
screen
Couplinglenses
gatedintensifier
mirror
Cooled CCDcamera
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 39
OPTICAL PREAMPLIFIEROPTICAL PREAMPLIFIER
photocathode
MCPselectron amplifier
phosphor
hν
hν’
e-
∅ 75 mm
ιd < 2 ns
t →
Fast light decay in phosphorto preserve time resolution
I
-250 V 0 V
2 kV
8 kV
!
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 40
New Optical DetectorNew Optical DetectorFast Gated IntensifierFast Gated Intensifier
∅ 40 mmhν
hν’
e-
+50 - 250 V
0 V
2 kV
8 kV
photocathode
MCPselectron amplifier
phosphor
gating electrode
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 41
Intensifier Exposure ControlIntensifier Exposure Control High Voltage Gating UnitHigh Voltage Gating Unit
Requirements:Gating control:• Computer Control
(GDG via RS232 from Weierganz/Mugai)
• Phase locked to Cyclotron HF
High Voltage Pulser:• < 10 ns- pulse width
• 2 MHz repetition rate
• 250 Vpp( +50 bis - 200 V)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 42
Properties and ResultsProperties and Results
TOF (ns)
• Camera(∆t ~ 10 ns)
• PM∆t ~ 2.5 ns)
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 43
7.7 MeV image10 min 100 c/pixel
6.8 MeV10 min ~ 100c/pix
ResultsResultsResonant imaging with OTIFANTI
Gamma- image Background image All-energies1 min 160 c/pixel
Carbon phantom
TOF
γ n
V. Dangendorf, 25.06.04 44
Resonant imaging with OTIFANTIResonant imaging with OTIFANTI
Ratio ofimages
ON-image(7.7 MeV)
OFF-image(6.8 MeV)
processed image